reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the relationship between profits and cancer treatment in the United States. They mention a study that found chemotherapy to be ineffective 97% of the time, but it is still used because doctors profit from it. The speaker explains how doctors receive financial incentives for prescribing chemotherapy drugs. They argue that the pharmaceutical industry has control over cancer treatment and that the medical system prioritizes drugs and surgery over alternative approaches. The speaker suggests that funding for cancer research should also go towards nutritional, homeopathic, acupuncture, and naturopathic research. They criticize the for-profit nature of the medical industry and its impact on patient outcomes.

The speaker developed a protocol, BioStrike, and believes it extended Harry Reid's life. In 2015, the speaker petitioned the FDA to use the treatment at diagnosis, hypothesizing that chemotherapy and radiation wipe out natural killer and T cells. The FDA required testing on end-stage patients who had failed standard care. Despite patients' collapsed immune systems, the speaker reports complete remissions in Merkel cell carcinoma (patient lived six years), bladder cancer (patients alive 10-11 years), triple negative breast cancer, and metastatic pancreatic cancer (patient disease-free after five years, still alive at six). After 700,000 pages of response, the treatment was approved in late 2024. The speaker believes they are on the verge of treating sepsis and cites a recent case of clearing a month-long inflamed lung due to valley fever. The speaker is treating patients with bladder, pancreatic, and lung cancer. The speaker wants to disseminate this information to the scientific, medical, and regulatory communities.

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong expresses concern over rising cancer rates, especially in younger people, citing instances of pancreatic and colon cancer in children. He notes a shift towards "turbocharged cancers" and attributes cancer's cause to the body's inability to kill defective cells due to immune system suppression. Dr. Soon-Shiong suggests COVID and mRNA vaccines could be related, drawing parallels to oncogenic viruses like hepatitis and HPV. He claims the spike protein in COVID persists, causing inflammation and suppressing natural killer cells. He advocates for clearing the virus and reducing inflammation to restore immune balance. He reveals his work on a T-cell-based "BioShield" to clear the virus and activate the immune system, contrasting it with antibody-based vaccines. He alleges that government agencies suppressed his efforts, favoring spike protein vaccines that don't clear the virus. He criticizes the FDA and NIH, claiming a "deep state" prioritizes politics over public health. Dr. Soon-Shiong emphasizes the importance of a strong immune system, sunlight, sleep, and avoiding toxins. He advocates for a cancer treatment approach that exposes tumors, activates killer cells, and suppresses suppressor cells, all while minimizing patient suffering. He also discusses his acquisition of the LA Times and his efforts to promote diverse voices and fact-based opinions.

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a textile dye but has shown significant benefits for mitochondria. It's surprising to see effective treatments being overlooked, raising questions about the medical industry's priorities. Why are cures that aren't profitable often ignored or demonized? This situation highlights a failure in our medical institutions to promote genuinely effective solutions.

The speaker claims that chemotherapy first wipes out red blood cells, causing anemia, with Epogen; second, neutrophils that prevent infection, with Neupogen; and most importantly, NK and T cells—the lymphocytes. He says, "the only thing that protects your body against cancer is your lymphocytes, meaning the NK cells and T cells," and that, with chemotherapy or radiation, "within a day or two, you wipe out the only cells that matter, i.e. The cells that kill can." He notes, "for thirty five years, we've never had a treatment for that." He links this to long COVID: during viral infection, "the virus is smart, it wipes out the T cells and NK cells." He points out the irony that Epogen and Neupogen are needed because chemotherapy has wiped out the cells that matter. A South African pancreas transplant surgeon says, "everything we've done so far has been wrong. We've actually treated cancer wrongly."

BioShield is a platform. IL-fifteen that proliferates and supercharges, and that's approved, called ANKTIVA—a little vial that is 'half a cc injected subcutaneously.' The approach is to educate T cells before activating them, including pre-activating T cells to recognize colon cancer in Lynch syndrome, where there is an eighty percent increase in colon cancer. Regarding COVID, the speaker argues we need a T cell vaccine and says they built one, funded without government money. They critique antibody-based vaccines for not stopping transmission and propose a nuclear capsid target for a universal T cell vaccine; completed phase one with self-injection. The FDA allegedly put them on hold for use as a booster. The speaker says, 'The answer is yes' to revival and notes offering ACE two decoy and approaching a major CEO, 'please take this. Please grow this.'

Fenbezodizole, a potential miracle drug for cancer, has at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms of action. It is speculated that big pharma fears it due to its low cost. The speaker hopes that Flint is aware of this and examines it. There has been some reaction to this discovery, and it is revealed that a similar drug in the same family, menbendazole, has already been approved by the FDA and is in clinical trials for brain and colon cancers. The lack of clinical trials for Fenbezodizole is attributed to its low cost, safety, and effectiveness. Big pharma's lack of interest in it is seen as an obstacle to people accessing potentially life-saving treatments. The speaker suggests that society is designed to make people sick, allowing big pharma to profit from their remedies.

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a fabric dye but is now known to have significant effects on mitochondria. It's surprising to discover that many effective treatments are overlooked or demonized, raising questions about the motives behind our medical institutions. Why are these cures not promoted when they are not profitable?

The speaker discusses promising results for high dose vitamin C in cancer treatment. A recent study on high dose vitamin C shows so much promise, and there have already been human trials underway in which patients who received high dose vitamin C did have drastically improved outcomes: they lived longer and they had less symptoms from the chemo. Mechanistically, the vitamin C literally wipes out the cancer cells via, like, four distinct very strong mechanisms. The speaker also notes that it is very safe as well. In addition, the speaker mentions other natural cancer therapies: ivermectin, fenbendazole, and now dandelion root extract, stating that all of these show extreme promise for natural cancer treatments.

Speaker 0 asserts that COVID-19 was a bioweapon designed and deployed with premeditation by Jews, claiming they spent substantial resources and influenced many people, and that this was done globally across the West—Australia, New Zealand, Europe, and America. The speaker states the plan was to leverage everything that happened during COVID and then drop “the bomb,” tying the outbreak to a global agenda and stating it encompasses the entire West without exception. The speaker claims COVID was used to advance a broader mission and labels the virus as moving slowly toward genocide, arguing that the rate of cancers is untenable. They assert there is a “cure for cancer” that was suppressed or revoked, naming ivermectin and “benzodols” (a reference to antiparasitics/anti-tubular medications) as medicines that attack cancer in multiple ways. The claim is that these treatments were suppressed through the COVID event, and that instead there would be mRNA cancer vaccines coming, which the speaker condemns as part of a larger deceit. They describe a global plan to revoke cancer cures and push new mRNA-based solutions, tying this to a broader narrative of control and manipulation. The speaker denies focusing on racial or ethnic lines, stating they are not dwelling on whiteness or brownness and emphasizing unity, saying, “Get over this fucking, like, you’re white. You’re brown,” and asserting there is one enemy, opposite to identitarian divisions. They present themselves as anti-antiidentitarian, claiming to promote unity across groups. The speaker offers a strategic suggestion: use the “mRNA bomb,” an explosive metaphor for the ongoing effects of mRNA technology, to create cohesion in areas with discohesion. The idea is that leveraging the ongoing impact of mRNA-related developments could unify people more effectively than simply labeling others as deluded or incorrect. They emphasize that everyone should be concerned and that families will be affected, indicating a sense of urgency and collective threat. The passage ends with an incomplete line, “We don’t have,” suggesting an unfinished thought or a pause in the argument. Overall, the speaker frames COVID-19 as a global bioweapon orchestrated by Jews to undermine health worldwide, suppress cancer cures, and push mRNA-based solutions, while advocating for a unifying, anti-identitarian approach and leveraging the continued impact of mRNA technology to consolidate cohesion.

Humans possess natural killer cells, present for 460 million years, that protect against infection, cancer, and trauma. Current cancer treatments like chemotherapy, radiation, and steroid therapy destroy these cells. A new therapy, approved in 2024, aims to activate these natural killer cells, enabling the body to fight cancer. One injection can unlock these cells so they proliferate and protect you from cancer. Bladder cancer patients have remained disease-free for ten years using this therapy. According to the speaker, the prior presidential administration blocked this therapy along with a COVID treatment and vaccine. This therapy may also treat long COVID, HIV, and sepsis. The speaker plans to discuss this further in a series called "Cancer Decoded."

The speaker claims messenger RNA vaccines with the spike protein can induce cancer in multiple ways. They allege the presence of oncogene stimulants, specifically SV40 in the Pfizer vaccine, confirmed by multiple researchers. A paper from Wurzburg purportedly confirms this and shows the vaccines convert cells to cancer. The speaker asserts the spike protein and mRNA vaccines bind to major suppressor genes like P53, BRCA, and MSH, which normally suppress cancer. Mutations in these genes can lead to earlier onset of cancer. The speaker suggests these vaccines could cause the equivalent of mutations in these genes, leading to an explosion of colorectal cancers. They advocate for an immediate ban on these vaccines and accountability for those who oppose it.

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they’re cancer-free. They took Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Methylene Blue, which has surprising benefits for mitochondria. It’s concerning how effective treatments are often ignored for profit. I got COVID and received remdesivir, which caused severe issues, while a friend died. There’s a troubling trend of prioritizing profit over lives in healthcare. Monoclonal antibodies were restricted to promote vaccines, which raises ethical questions. Mel Gibson and others are starting to speak out against these issues, highlighting the dangers of certain treatments and the need for awareness. We must recognize the importance of sharing knowledge and supporting those who fight against these injustices.

There are laws that prevent doctors from trying alternative treatments for cancer, limiting them to only proven unsuccessful methods. The speaker suggests that if this restriction could be lifted, significant progress could be made. They also imply that the pharmaceutical industry profits from this situation, as there is a lot of money to be made from drugs.

Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning anti-parasitic drug, has been vilified. Merck, who held the patent until 1996, claims it doesn't work for COVID-19. However, Merck has a 50/50 partnership with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines. Because Merck will make billions on mRNA cancer vaccines, they have no interest in investigating ivermectin for cancer. There is evidence that high-dose ivermectin is effective in treating many types of cancers.

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like ivermectin, fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a textile dye but is now found to have significant effects on mitochondria. It's surprising how many effective treatments are overlooked or demonized, often due to profit motives. Many beneficial substances, such as vitamin D, K2, magnesium, zinc, and quercetin, are not promoted because they lack patent protection and cannot be controlled by pharmaceutical companies.

Speaker 0: Let's start with I had predicted, unfortunately, and I hate that I am right. I predicted before the vaccines were ever launched to the public that they would have a profound impact on the immune system. And as a result of that alone, would likely cause increased cancer rates just because of their immunological impact. So let's start, if you would, just by talking a little bit about what you are seeing in the data, in the numbers with regard to cancers, what kinds of cancers, those sorts of things. And then maybe we'll get into the weeds, you and I, about perhaps some of the pathology of that, why that might be, some theories for why we're seeing these numbers. Speaker 1: You know, Doctor. Kelly, I've been tracking these turbo cancers as they're being called, these very aggressive cancers that are showing up in young COVID vaccinated people. The youngest case I've reported is a 12 year old boy who had a Moderna vaccine and came down with, end stage brain cancer that killed him in less than a year. I'm seeing it in teenagers in university and college students who are mandated to take COVID vaccines. People in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties are coming down with stage four cancers. These cancers are presenting at a late stage, stage three, but usually stage four. These are lymphomas, leukemias, these are breast cancers, colon cancers, lung cancers, hepatobiliary cancers, testicular cancers in young men, ovarian cancers in women, kidney cancers, renal cell cancers, melanomas, skin cancers, and sarcomas as well. So these are the types of cancers that are showing up in a younger cohort than oncologists expect. They're showing up at a late stage. The tumors can grow very large. So some of these tumors are described as football sized, even watermelon sized, you know, these are ten, fifteen centimeter tumors, and they're very aggressive and and they really they spread very rapidly. Even when the surgeons are trying to get at them, trying to surgically excise them so that they could control the tumor, what they usually find after surgery is that the tumor has already spread. It's already spread to the lymph nodes, it's already spread to the lungs or the bones, very aggressive cancers, and really related to the COVID-nineteen vaccine specifically, and mRNA vaccines, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Speaker 0: One of the things, me just step back for a second, because one of the things that might not be known to our audience is that all cancers are not created equal with regard to the population that they hit. You know, for example, we not uncommonly and tragically see certain blood cancers in children leukemias, for example. It wouldn't be uncommon, to to see a brain tumor, brain cancers sometimes in young children. It would be extraordinarily uncommon to see a colon cancer in somebody before the fourth or fifth decade. Very uncommon to see a lung cancer before the fourth or fifth decade. Those sorts of things, extremely uncommon to see. So some of these cancers that we are seeing, and I think you're getting at that, things like these colon cancers, we are now seeing colon cancers in people in their late teens, twenties, and thirties. And again, as you said, very aggressive colon cancers. So it's not just that cancers per se, but it's seeing cancers in in groups of people in whom they'd never seen before. So let's in terms of just to put some magnitude on it. In terms of give us some sense of the magnitude versus what we would have considered to be the baseline numbers. Speaker 1: You know, it's very hard to get a sense of this because it's almost impossible to get good cancer data from from the governments. Know, Ed Dowd has talked about this, the difficulty of getting good data. You know, I've tried to get cancer data here in Canada from Statistics Canada, from the Canadian Cancer Society, and they are not reporting any data from 2021 or 2022. It seems they're holding this data back. And so I'm left with anecdotal evidence. When Ed Dowd, you know, he'll report from US insurance data that disability rates, in the working population, let's say, eighteen to sixty four, who abided by the COVID vaccine mandates, disability rates are 500% higher compared to the working population who dropped out of the workforce and didn't want to get the vaccines. Well, a big portion of those disabilities are these cancers, are these cancer diagnoses. And so, you know, I'm seeing an explosion of these cancers. I'm seeing it in doctors. I'm seeing it in nurses. I'm seeing it in other vaccine mandated professions. So all types of healthcare workers, I'm seeing it in teachers, I'm seeing it in police officers, firefighters, the military. You know, you see it in flight attendants, for example, you know, you had these airlines that wanted to have 100% vaccinated workforce. So really anywhere where there were very strict COVID vaccine mandates, that's where I'm seeing these explosions of these very aggressive cancers. And I can tell you, this year, '23, seems to be much worse. There's many more cases of these turbo cancers than in 2022 or 2021. The trend is upwards. The numbers are on the rise. You can see this on websites like GoFundMe. If you go on GoFundMe and you put stage four cancer and you can pick whatever cancer you want, you could put, you know, breast cancer, you could put lung cancer, colon cancer. Not only are you seeing the shocking ages, young ages of these individuals who are reporting their cancers and their fundraising because, you know, they lose their jobs when they're undergoing chemotherapy, for example, by you see just how many people are suffering are coming down from these cancers, especially in 2023. It's just unbelievable. It's a tsunami of cancer diagnosis.

The speaker believes vaccines are causing cancer, with the risk increasing exponentially with each booster, because boosters suppress T cell response, which controls cancer. Experts claim messenger RNA is safe because we are exposed to it daily and it's easily disposed of, but the speaker argues that mRNA vaccines are stabilized to prevent disposal, which is the core problem. The speaker claims that mRNA can integrate and hack your genetic code, promoting oncogenes and down-regulating suppressor genes. They state that the UK and Australia have invested heavily in mRNA technology without proper oversight. The speaker advocates for ending this culture and improving population health.

Speaker 1 states they haven't been encouraged to speak about their work because they are not a political person, and they are focused on finding solutions for both COVID and cancer. They claim their SpyShield technology works for both. Speaker 1 says they didn't realize the political deep state was so powerful that it would stop good science. They are now speaking out because the drug was approved, but only for bladder cancer. They assert it has the same treatment effect for pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, and triple negative breast cancer. They claim it is the only molecule for fifty years that upregulates killer cells.

A recent study found that the malaria drug Chloroquine does not inhibit SARS CoV 2 in lung cells, although it may work in kidney cells. The speaker, who has experience in ocular oncology, contacted the author of the study and pointed out that the lung cells used in the study were actually cancer cells. This means that Chloroquine allows the virus to attack cancer cells but not normal cells. The speaker believes that this is a misinterpretation of the data and accuses the study of being part of a disinformation campaign. They argue that Chloroquine is actually a very effective drug.

Speaker 1 notes that ivermectin has broken through to the public sphere beyond COVID and is now discussed for many diseases. Speaker 0 asks where ivermectin stands in the scientific and medical community today and what other use cases exist for the medicine. Speaker 1 responds that thousands of doctors follow their data; 18,000 GI doctors see their data when they publish or present at the American College of Gastroenterology. Word-of-mouth in the medical community is a major form of marketing, with one doctor speaking to another. Referencing the COVID era, Speaker 1 mentions corruption and retractions, then describes ivermectin as having created a healthcare revolution where doctors have lined up to work to see other benefits of ivermectin without needing to ask permission to treat patients. A whole branch of healthcare is moving away from the same institute that Speaker 1 helped create drugs to market with his sisters. He says a group of doctors who had sponsored or helped pharma are turning away from pharma and exploring other methods to treat patients. He states his job is to unite doctors to see the truth, while bringing pharma back to being righteous and stopping data manipulation and scientist censorship. Speaker 1 references his book, Let’s Talk SH.T, acknowledging he could be wrong and challenging others to prove him wrong and reproduce the data to retract the hypothesis or paper. He emphasizes that the scientific process should be followed, especially when everything was done by the book and as well as he could. He adds that the research was not funded by others; it was funded by his savings. He created the microbiome research foundation with the goal of raising money to study kids with autism and to push an IND to the FDA, which cost about $600,000 to obtain FDA approval. He clarifies that no external party paid for this work, and he continues to struggle to raise funds to treat poor autistic kids who cannot afford expensive stool testing, drugs, and vitamins; they need help and everyone should step in to assist these kids. Speaker 1 concludes that their focus is fixing autism, with the aim of later addressing Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and cancer.

Did you know that during 2021, while we were all locked down at home during COVID nineteen, that our government in The United States was paying researchers to investigate two of the 36 poisons that were found in all COVID patients, and they injected them into mammals and create within seventy two hours glioblastoma tumors. And then they were paid by our government to see if they could reverse glioblastoma tumor formation that they created in three days or less. And do you know they dissolved within seventy two hours glioblastoma tumors with? Nicotine. Did you know nicotine is a published cure for Parkinson's disease, MS, Alzheimer's, ulcerative colitis, all arthritis, all of them. Psoriatic, gout, osteo, rheumatoid. Did you know that autism traits? Yeah. They've already investigated nicotine patches between the shoulder blades of all children and adults, and within seven days they see improvements in all their symptoms.

The speaker describes cancer as an autonomous entity that hides, like a virus, by blocking expression through genomic sequencing. Low-dose chemotherapy or low-dose radiation (SBRT) can be used to stress the cancer and "smoke it out," exposing it to the immune system. The speaker advocates for a simultaneous, multi-pronged approach: expose the tumor, activate natural killer (NK) and T cells (using a "BioShield" molecule to upregulate them and drive memory T cells), educate T cells with a vaccine, activate macrophages, and suppress suppressors. This approach aims to use the tumor as a vaccine by educating T cells to recognize foreign molecules. The speaker claims this protocol is done entirely on an outpatient basis, without the typical suffering associated with conventional cancer therapy. They report bladder cancer patients in complete remission for nine years using this method.

The speaker expresses frustration that COVID vaccines are still recommended for those most likely to be injured by them. They claim Vinay Prasad, now at the FDA, attacked them on ivermectin, stating it doesn't work and that "turbo cancer" is not a thing. The speaker believes there is denial regarding the mRNA technology and its potential link to aggressive cancers, as well as ivermectin's potential as a solution. They suggest that admitting the mRNA vaccines may be causing cancer and that ivermectin may be a solution could force the shutdown of the mRNA technology. The speaker claims there are numerous publications suggesting the vaccines may be causing aggressive "turbo cancers." They state the new Trump administration doesn't want to abandon the mRNA technology, complicating the use of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and benzoyl in cancer treatment due to a lack of support.