reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Israel does not retaliate without rules. If we were to stoop to the level of committing crimes against humanity, we would be forced to be just as terrible ourselves. I believe we should at least credit ourselves with the ability to not descend into barbarism. Our problem today is more about weakness.

Israel's strategy of bombing areas where they know civilians are present is seen as evidence that they want to kill innocent people. They justify this by claiming that Hamas uses civilians as human shields. The speaker argues that this is not a valid justification and compares it to a hypothetical situation where someone's mother is held captive. The speaker believes that bombing these areas indiscriminately puts innocent lives at risk, rather than targeting Hamas militants.

If you're intentionally killing civilians, you shouldn't boast about it; it's evil, and it should be acknowledged as such. Killing women and children in war raises serious moral questions. It's hard to justify such actions, even in extreme circumstances like a world war. While some might argue there are moral justifications for actions taken during war, intentionally targeting noncombatants is fundamentally wrong. This contradicts the principles we claim to uphold in conflict.

The speaker decries tweeting the f word on Easter morning and demands respect for the holiday. They argue that sending out a tweet promising the murder of civilians while declaring “praise be to Allah” is a mockery of both Islam and Christianity, and that the author cannot be supported by Christians who oppose such mockery. The speaker asserts that the tweet implies using the US military to destroy civilian infrastructure in another country, which they describe as a war crime and a moral crime against the people of that country. They specify targets such as bridges that people cross daily to go to school, work, and worship, including church, noting that there are over a million Christians in Iran and that this is “their Easter too.” They reference civilian power plants in Iran, a country with almost 100,000,000 people, and question the consequences of power loss. The speaker warns that without power, babies connected to incubators die and people in hospitals die, highlighting the human impact of such actions. The speaker rejects any justification rooted in international law, emphasizing moral law and God’s law instead, stating that killing noncombatants—people who did nothing wrong and did not choose the war—is immoral and unacceptable. They declare that it can never be moral or justified and that such actions are always wrong.

Over 500,000 children have died, surpassing the number of child casualties in Hiroshima. Despite the difficulty of the decision, we believe the price is justified.

The news from Gaza is horrific and unacceptable. International humanitarian and law must be respected in all cases, including this one. There are rules regarding wars, and it is not acceptable to ignore them.

Israel's actions in the conflict have raised questions about humanity. Despite recognizing one atrocity as wrong, people seem to turn a blind eye as more lives are lost and communities destroyed. The sheer number of bombs dropped by Israel is alarming.

My family's history, escaping Nazi Germany, should not be used to justify the killing of others.

A US senator called for war crimes and mass murder of innocent Palestinian civilians, which is illegal and violates international treaties. This includes collective punishment, attacking children, and a disproportionate response. While Hamas has committed war crimes and should be held accountable, responding with more war crimes is unacceptable. This perpetuates violence and causes more death and destruction for civilians. As a human rights lawyer, even one civilian death is too many. We must unite as a global community to protect both Jewish and Palestinian civilians and uphold the international rule of law.

We operate militarily within international law. The entire nation is responsible, not just civilians. Claims that civilians are unaware or uninvolved are false. They could have fought against the evil regime that took over Gaza, but we are at war. We defend and protect our homes. When a nation protects its home, it fights until the enemy is defeated.

The situation is terrible, and we understand that both sides are suffering greatly. Regardless of who is weaker, we should strive to minimize or eliminate civilian casualties among women, children, and the elderly. If men have decided to fight amongst themselves, let them do so, but leave the children and women alone. This applies to both sides.

This is a war, a bloody and messy combat. Innocent civilians will be hurt, and I wish it could be different. However, it is the unfortunate nature of conflict. We will still express concerns and support the Israelis in minimizing civilian casualties.

I believe that war is not a good thing, but sometimes you have to fight back when someone is attacking you. I won't go after anyone who isn't attacking me, but it's important to defend yourself and not allow anyone to kill you.

Over half a million children have lost their lives, surpassing the number of child casualties in Hiroshima. Despite the difficulty of the decision, we believe the price is justified.

It's hard to see those images and think any rational leader would do that. We can all agree on his wickedness. War is brutal, messy, and innocent people will suffer. I wish it wasn't true, but it is.

I find it appalling when a powerful country uses its military strength to attack another country without any reason. It's like what happened in Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea, and now Ukraine. It's truly terrible.

This is not about arguing who is right or wrong, who started it or who didn't. The problem here is not a war. It's genocide, which has already killed nearly two thousand children who have nothing to do with this war. They are victims of this war. And honestly, I don't know how a human being can wage war knowing that the result is the death of innocent children.

We had 7 team members in a clearly marked humanitarian convoy that was deliberately targeted over 1.8 kilometers. This is not the role of an army, especially when there are drones monitoring the area. It seems like a war against humanity, with buildings, hospitals, schools, and civilians being destroyed. Targeting humanitarians, children, and the very essence of humanity is unacceptable.

Speaker 0 describes a stance to attack only on the front lines, not against women or children, noting that “that was a data loss,” and that they “did it to all fronts” and “we did not fly a night attack.” He argues that since bombs would be dropped anyway, before the German people he cannot permit his own Volksgenossen to perish while sparing foreigners, so the war must be fought and the sacrifices available must be used. Speaker 1, after acknowledging that he cannot deny this any longer, refers to himself as “the greatest strategist born so far” and declares that the Luftkrieg (air war) is his doing. He calls it a brilliant idea by Mister Georgill against the civilian population, noting England apparently rejected this in anticipation of future developments. He asserts that in this war he did not conduct night attacks on civilian populations in Poland, arguing that at night the objective cannot be hit as accurately, so he primarily targeted roofs and aimed at military targets. He says he did the same in Norway, Holland, and France. He contrasts this with a belief that the British Air Force would be unable to escape German scrutiny if night raids targeted civilians, implying that the German campaign aimed at military targets. As the war in the West ended, he extended his efforts toward “Henglad,” and faced pressure from many to act sooner: “how long, Führer, do you wait? They do not stop.” He waited over three months and then gave the order to commence the fight with the same resolve with which he had started every battle, continuing “up to now.” Speaker 2 portrays the enemy as incredibly cruel and determined to destroy Germany, stating that the enemy has proclaimed this thousands of times, and asserting that there is no reason to doubt it. He intensifies the claim by equating the enemies’ motives with biblical purge concepts, describing a wish for Germany’s extermination with “Mann und Maus und Jung und Alt.” He emphasizes that what would be done to German women and children cannot be imagined, urging that it will be a total war that affects every German, their lives, existence, family, wife, and child—the war threatens life itself. He concludes that wherever now flourishing cities and villages exist, a future of desolation would result, turning into a desert; the war, he says, is total and affects everyone.

World War 2 was a horrific conflict that brought unimaginable suffering to millions. The Allied forces committed atrocities against Germany, but history has painted them as heroes. The true horrors of war are often hidden, with victims enduring unspeakable pain. Those who claim the Allies' actions were justified likely have not witnessed the true brutality of war. Ultimately, there is no such thing as a good war - only those who profit from it or have not experienced its horrors firsthand.

I apologize, Nelly, but it's not audible. Excuse me, but it's not justifiable to say that killing children who have...

We strongly oppose an immediate ceasefire as it allows the killing of children. This is a war specifically targeting children.

UN officials have accused Hamas of killing 1,400 people, but now they claim that thousands of Palestinians have been killed. This argument is similar to the one made by Nazi death squads during the Nuremberg trials. The Nazis tried to justify their killings by pointing out that the Allies had also killed civilians in bombings like Dresden. However, the Nuremberg court rejected this defense, stating that intentionally killing civilians is not the same as unintentional civilian deaths. Unfortunately, the United Nations is now witnessing a similar defense being used to equate deliberate civilian killings with unintended casualties. This comparison should be completely rejected.

We are in an image war where media shows images of crying mothers with a plastic baby, making it seem like a dead baby. But there are also real children dying, and you are well aware of that. There are real children dying naturally, civilian victims everywhere, and naturally, it is regrettable. We must mourn all civilian victims who are victims of war. It is important to remember that they are victims and justice should quickly analyze this.

Some people think it's acceptable to bomb hospitals with children. It's difficult to watch videos where kids are told not to cry, even though they should be allowed to express their emotions. President Biden, not all Americans support your actions. Wake up and realize that we are witnessing genocide and the killing of many innocent people. You are on the right side of history by trying to save lives. Stop politicizing the situation and continue your efforts to stop this tragedy.