TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Affirmative action and DEI are forms of anti-white racism, creating a structural disadvantage for white men in jobs, contracts, and schools. This undermines the meritocracy and opportunity that America has offered immigrants for over a century. Arvind Krishna, CEO of IBM, supports this racial hierarchy by urging employees to hire fewer white men or face pay cuts. The leaked video exposes the reality of corporate America's DEI initiatives, which punish those who push back against racism. This widespread form of Jim Crow is incompatible with the United States. The Civil Rights Division's Justice Department is doing nothing about it, but Stephen Miller and America First Legal are taking action. The system is designed to crush spirits and break people.

A taxpayer-funded group, Hacienda Community Development Corporation, offers $30,000 in payment assistance in Oregon to non-US citizens, including DACA recipients, asylees, and green card holders. American citizens are ineligible. One speaker calls this state-sponsored discrimination, asserting the goal is to open up housing to non-US citizens. Another speaker suggests the open border exists so these individuals can vote Democrat. The speakers note a housing shortage in the US, particularly in Oregon, and claim giving $30,000 to non-taxpayers will raise housing prices for everyone else.

USDA data indicates that farms are collecting millions of dollars over the payment cap by exploiting eligibility rules adopted from Congress's farm bills. These rules allow large farms to collect maximum payments on behalf of multiple individuals, including relatives. Even if someone lives in New York City and doesn't farm, they can receive payments simply by having an ownership interest in the farm and making a few phone calls a year. They don't have to live on or visit the farm to receive these payments.

The Biden administration announced that victims of the LA wildfires will receive 100% of their recovery costs covered for the next 180 days. In contrast, victims in East Palestine, Maui, and those affected by hurricanes in the southeast received only a $750 loan, which required proving damage to qualify. This disparity highlights the frustration over the differing levels of support provided to disaster victims, especially when the LA wildfires were deemed preventable by the state of California.

The price of eggs is down. There has been a decades-long issue with Mexico regarding water access for farmers along the border, but a deal was reached that is believed to be the best in history for the farmers. Agriculture has a major role in the energy dominance agenda, including biofuels. Under the Biden administration, farmers experienced a 30% increase in input costs, and the U.S. went from a $0 trade deficit in agriculture products to a $50 billion deficit. Congress passed a bill providing $10 billion to farmers who couldn't plant crops, and the USDA distributed the money quickly. The USDA has canceled $6 billion in contracts, including DEI and gender studies, and is undergoing a major restructuring to prioritize farmers. The USDA is also focused on food stamps and nutrition, emphasizing the importance of farmers and ranchers in making America healthy.

I voted for Donald Trump, and now our farm is at risk. We're in danger of losing it because the NRCS isn't upholding their contract with us regarding the EQIP program. This program, which cost-shares improvements like fencing and wells, was funded by the Inflation Reduction Act. However, executive orders have frozen the funding, preventing payments for completed work and future projects. This isn't just affecting me; other farmers are in the same situation. Before making business decisions, I verified the funding was secured per contract, not contingent. Now, they're breaking the contract due to the funding freeze.

Speaker 0: The seventy six day period is the time between when President Trump was elected and President Biden left office. Is that right? Speaker 1: Correct. During that period, from the loan program office in loans and commitments, $93,000,000,000 went out the door—well over twice as much as in the previous fifteen years. There were funds that went out the door and commitments made from businesses that provided no business plan and no numbers about their own financial solvency or how this project... Speaker 0: So you’re telling me that the Department of Energy, in the seventy six day period, before their boss was going to leave office, gave our loan money to entities that had no business plan? Correct. No financials? Speaker 1: Correct. I’ve come in with great concern about how this institution, Speaker 0: this great American institution has been run and how American taxpayer money has been handled. You’re going back through and checking each one of these loans and these grants to make sure there was no stealing, aren’t you? Speaker 1: We’re looking at that, and yes, my blood pressure is rising right now just thinking about what we have seen and what did happen at the moment. Gonna tell some of these boondoggles no, aren’t you? Speaker 0: That’s correct. I am. It’s rare that I’m speechless, but I want to be sure I understood. The people running the Department of Energy for President Biden’s administration shoveled $93,000,000,000 out the door in seventy six days, and it just happened to be the time between when President Trump was elected and President Biden, their boss, was leaving. Is that right? Speaker 1: It is correct and distasteful. Confidence undermining. My god.

A USDA whistleblower revealed that the Biden administration implemented a DEI initiative offering loan forgiveness to socially disadvantaged farmers, defined as American Indian, Alaskan native, Asian, Black, African American, native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Hispanic, or Latino. According to the whistleblower, this plan involved $800 million in taxpayer money and was intentionally kept quiet. White farmers, like James Dunlap, were excluded, leading to a lawsuit that successfully halted the program. A judge ruled the program unconstitutional and irreparably harmful. The Biden administration then passed the Inflation Reduction Act to aid struggling farmers, but the whistleblower alleges that information about this assistance was selectively shared only with minority farmers, with USDA workers instructed to advise them to halt loan payments. The whistleblower accuses the USDA of unethical and discriminatory practices, stating that those responsible remain in charge. The USDA did not respond to specific questions but stated they are rescinding DEI programs and prioritizing unity, equality, meritocracy, and color-blind policies. They are also reviewing the Inflation Reduction Act funding to ensure equitable distribution to all farmers.

Speaker 0 asserts that there are two F’s that come to mind: fraud by design and financial Armageddon. - Fraud by design: This, according to Speaker 0, was not an accident or a happenstance event. It is described as a system that is designed by the left for people in their social circles. The claim traces the system back to the top of the federal government, beginning with the Obama administration and being promulgated even more by the Biden administration. It is said to run down to the states, including governors across the country, specifically naming governors Waltz and Mills. The speaker also mentions the local level, noting bad actors and headlines in Maine and Minnesota. The overarching assertion is that this situation is “the tip of the iceberg.” - Financial Armageddon: The second F is financial Armageddon. Speaker 0 argues that if the Trump administration does not take the issue seriously, listeners are “probably on another planet.” The speaker contends that the problem will have implications for the state of Maine amounting to “billions with a b of dollars,” and that this will spell financial Armageddon for the state. The speaker emphasizes the urgent need to get a handle on the problem. In sum, Speaker 0 portrays a systemic, politically driven pattern of fraud across federal, state, and local levels, described as the tip of the iceberg, and projects drastic financial consequences for Maine unless the issue is addressed, asserting that the Trump administration is serious about taking action.

A business owner is selling their food truck, which they bought in 2019 for over $25,000 cash. The potential buyer, an illegal immigrant with no credit or money, showed paperwork indicating they will receive funds to purchase the truck. The seller, a veteran who has been self-employed for decades, claims they have good credit but cannot get a business loan due to their skin color. They want to know why someone who recently came to the country with no credit is receiving money to buy their food truck when they had to work hard to establish their business. The bank told them that normally they have to go to a dealership, but in special circumstances, they allow it. They are demanding answers from the vice president, who is running for president, about why immigrants are getting money while they struggled to get a business loan.

A business owner wants the vice president to address why immigrants are allegedly receiving funds while she struggles to obtain loans. She bought a food truck in 2019 for over $25,000 cash after working hard. Now selling it, she encountered an undocumented immigrant with no credit or money who showed her paperwork indicating he would receive funds to buy the truck. She says she has good credit but can't get a business loan due to her skin color, despite being a veteran and self-employed for decades. She wants to know how someone new to the country with no credit can get funding to buy her food truck when she had to work hard to create her business. She says the bank told her that normally they only give loans to dealerships, but they are making an exception in this case. She feels it's unfair that immigrants are getting money for "doing nothing but just being here."

In February, we asked all the states for the first time to turn over their data to the federal government to let the USDA partner with them to root out fraud, to ensure those who really need food stamps are getting them, and to protect the American taxpayer. 21 states said yes, not surprise 29 states said yes, not surprisingly, the red states, and that's where all of that data, that fraud comes from. But 21 states, including California, New York, and Minnesota, the blue states, continue to say no. So as of next week, we have begun to stop moving federal funds into those states until they comply, and they tell us and allow us to partner with them to root out this fraud and protect the American taxpayer. As Joe Biden was working to buy an election a year ago, he increased food stamp program funding by 40%. Yeah. So now as we continue to roll that back.

Affirmative action and DEI are forms of anti-white racism that put white men at a disadvantage in jobs, contracts, and schools. This undermines the idea of meritocracy and tells new immigrants that white men are the problem. The leaked video of IBM's CEO, Arvind Krishna, shows him instructing employees to hire fewer white men or face pay cuts. Another employee from Red Hat, an IBM subsidiary, revealed that those who opposed DEI initiatives were fired. These videos expose the reality of corporate America's widespread and vicious form of Jim Crow. The Civil Rights Division's Justice Department is not addressing this issue, but Stephen Miller, founder of America First Legal, is taking action. This blatant discrimination destroys lives and crushes spirits.

The Inflation Reduction Act, nearly two years old, is being scrutinized for funding organizations perceived as radical and anti-American. Over $3 billion allocated through the EPA is reportedly going to groups that promote anti-police, anti-border security, and anti-Israel sentiments. Notable recipients include the Climate Justice Alliance and the NDN Collective, which advocate for defunding police and military. Concerns are raised about the lack of oversight and accountability in how taxpayer money is spent. Calls for increased scrutiny and potential defunding of these initiatives are emphasized, especially if there is a change in congressional control. The urgency to address these issues is highlighted, as the administration appears to be rushing to distribute funds before potential changes in leadership.

The speaker expresses disbelief that the Department of Energy under the Biden administration disbursed $93 billion in 76 days between President Trump's election and President Biden taking office. The speaker confirms with an interviewee that these funds were given to entities lacking business plans and financials. The speaker characterizes this as "distasteful" and "confidence undermining."

This $20 billion "green slush fund" was set up by the Biden administration with money parked in an outside bank and given to eight NGOs, many newly created just to receive these funds. The EPA entered account control agreements with these entities, designed to limit federal oversight, allowing money to flow through multiple layers of pass-throughs to subgrantees. The funds aren't directly remediating environmental issues, but rather going to friends and those connected to the Obama and Biden administrations as well as donors. A CEO serving on Biden's White House Environmental Justice Council received $20 million for her organization while on the council. The EPA's oversight was further reduced through amended account control agreements right up to the inauguration, making it easier to pass through money unchecked.

The speaker is reacting to a post on X by HUD Secretary Scott Turner stating that, per the president's instructions, a HUD program funding FHA loans for illegal aliens is being stopped. The speaker expresses outrage that undocumented immigrants were allegedly receiving FHA loans while American citizens struggled to qualify due to high interest rates under the Biden administration. They question how individuals without social security numbers or credit history could obtain these loans, suggesting identity theft or manipulation of the system. The speaker accuses the Democratic Party of abuse for allegedly prioritizing illegal immigrants over citizens and urges listeners to never vote for Democrats again. They claim that these immigrants were living in entire homes at the expense of American citizens.

Brooke Rollins at the USDA claims to have discovered "woke seeds" intended to promote diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility at the USDA. These seeds are specifically tomato seeds. Rollins states that the discovery exemplifies what they are fighting against in Washington D.C. She says they are working to realign the government under President Trump's vision of returning power to the people and putting Americans first. Rollins asserts that they will no longer spend tax dollars on diversity, equity, and inclusion at the USDA.

During the 76-day period between President Trump's election and President Biden leaving office, the Department of Energy's loan program office issued $93 billion in loans and commitments. This sum is reportedly over twice the amount disbursed in the previous fifteen years. These funds and commitments were allegedly given to businesses lacking business plans or proof of financial solvency. The Department of Energy purportedly gave taxpayer money to entities with no business plan or financials during this period. An investigation is underway to check each loan and grant for potential theft. The claim is that $93 billion was distributed in those 76 days.

During the 76-day period between President Trump's election and President Biden leaving office, the Department of Energy's loan program office issued $93 billion in loans and commitments. This sum is reportedly more than double the amount disbursed in the preceding 15 years. These funds and commitments were allegedly given to businesses lacking business plans or proof of financial solvency. The Department of Energy purportedly gave taxpayer money to entities with no business plan or financials during this period. There are concerns about how the institution was run and how taxpayer money was handled. Each loan and grant is being reviewed to ensure there was no stealing. The Department of Energy under President Biden's administration allegedly shoveled $93 billion out the door in 76 days, between President Trump's election and President Biden leaving.

Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness plan, which is worth $1 trillion, is being criticized for benefiting wealthy individuals. The plan has already forgiven $127 billion in student loans, on top of the $350 billion in loan deferrals due to the pandemic. Critics argue that college graduates, who earn more than the average taxpayer, are benefiting from taxpayer money. The interest rates on student loans were already heavily subsidized, and certain groups, such as government employees, have their loans forgiven entirely. The Biden administration is expected to continue using taxpayer funds to secure votes, even selling off national assets like the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Critics believe this administration prioritizes special interest groups over struggling taxpayers.

President Biden is facing backlash from Republicans and former Democrat Senator Kyrsten Sinema over allegations of stealing $105 million from Arizona. Sinema had previously held up Biden's inflation bills, concerned about excessive spending and its impact on inflation. In exchange for her support, she secured $100 million to strengthen the border in Arizona. However, Senate leader Chuck Schumer and House leader Hakeem Jeffries redirected the funds to New York, allegedly to support illegal immigrants residing in posh hotels with meals, cell phones, and other amenities. While conspiracy theories suggest this is a strategy to gain Democratic voters, the documented fact remains that Biden approved the diversion of funds from the border crisis to improve conditions for illegal immigrants in New York.

In April 2024, the Biden-Harris administration, through the EPA, allocated $7 billion to the United Climate Fund, part of a larger $20 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund hidden within the Inflation Reduction Act. This money was funneled to Power Forward Communities, connected to Stacey Abrams, lacking transparency and accountability. An EPA official revealed this as an "insurance policy" against Trump winning the election, indicating a rushed cash dump. The $20 billion was stashed at Citibank but is now being reclaimed by the government. This isn't incompetence; it's calculated theft.

The speaker discussed efforts to realign the government, mentioning the cancellation of several contracts at the US Department of Agriculture. One $300,000 contract was canceled in San Francisco that was for educating queer and transgender farmers on food justice. A similar contract in New York educating transgender and queer farmers on food justice and food equality was also canceled. Additionally, a $600,000 contract in Louisiana studying the menstrual cycles of transgender men was canceled. Another contract with a university focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion in the pest management industry was also canceled. The speaker stated that these contracts were nonsensical uses of taxpayer dollars and are a few examples of many that have been found.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the politicization of science and changes at the NIH. Over the last fifteen to twenty years, the NIH incorporated what Speaker 1 characterizes as political agendas rather than scientific agendas into its portfolio, with DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) being the most prominent example. A chunk of NIH funding went to projects focused on achieving social objectives rather than the health mission. Every NIH employee allegedly had to write a loyalty oath to DEI principles and was evaluated on devotion to the cause. Researchers inside and outside the NIH could access funds, with outside researchers more easily securing money if they promised to conduct DEI research, according to Speaker 1. Much of that research allegedly lacked a real scientific basis and was not science. Speaker 1 provides an example of projects they worked to deprioritize: a project asking whether structural racism is the root reason why African Americans have worse hypertension outcomes. The problem, they say, is that there is no way to test the hypothesis because, if structural racism is the cause, there is no workable control group to test the idea as true. They assert that such research did not translate into better health for anybody, including minority populations. They describe these projects as political agendas that do not belong in a science agency. The stated mission is to improve the health of everybody, including minority populations, but only if projects are clearly scientific, well defined, and have a real chance of improving health. Speaker 0 asks for clarification, summarizing that there were ideological or political projects receiving NIH funding. Speaker 1 confirms and adds another practice: when a good science project ended the year with leftover funds, program officers would approach researchers with leftover money and offer a “diversity supplement”—an add-on tied to DEI that was not actual science—to obtain extra funding. This, they claim, was a waste of taxpayer money with no real health benefit. They say they have since gotten rid of all of that.