reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly discusses Donald Trump's upcoming arraignment in D.C. and expresses frustration over media coverage, suggesting that the narrative is biased against Trump. She highlights other significant news, such as Devin Archer's testimony regarding Hunter Biden's alleged corruption, which she feels is being overlooked. Andrew Klavan joins the conversation, emphasizing that Trump is leading the GOP nomination process while Biden's administration faces scrutiny over corruption allegations. Klavan argues that the Department of Justice (DOJ) appears politically motivated in its actions against Trump, particularly in timing indictments to coincide with revelations about Biden's corruption. The discussion shifts to the upcoming debate between Ron DeSantis and Gavin Newsom, seen as potential successors to Trump and Biden. Klavan notes that DeSantis has improved his campaign performance and is appealing to Republican voters, while also addressing cultural issues. He criticizes the current political leadership's age and lack of fresh ideas, suggesting a need for younger leaders who can connect with the electorate. The conversation also touches on the cultural war, with Klavan asserting that the right has been losing ground but is beginning to fight back. He mentions the importance of addressing issues affecting families and children, particularly in education. The discussion highlights the need for a cultural shift and the role of women in advocating for traditional values. Later, Kelly and Klavan discuss Archer's testimony, which implicates Biden in efforts to protect his son's business interests in Ukraine. They argue that the evidence suggests a pattern of corruption that warrants further investigation. Klavan expresses concern over the implications of ongoing legal battles for Trump and the Republican Party's electoral prospects. Alan Dershowitz joins the show to provide legal insights on Trump's indictments, arguing that the cases lack solid evidence and may be politically motivated. He emphasizes the importance of a fair trial and the potential consequences of a conviction in a politically charged environment. Dershowitz suggests that the ultimate judgment should come from voters rather than the courts. The episode concludes with a discussion on crime in Oakland, featuring Bishop Bob Jackson and Seneca Scott, who criticize the city's leadership for failing to address rising crime rates. They express concern over the impact of soft-on-crime policies and the need for effective law enforcement. The conversation highlights the disconnect between political leaders and the safety concerns of residents, calling for urgent action to restore public safety.

California has become a focal point of discussion due to a significant exodus of residents, with many considering themselves political refugees. Michael Shellenberger, a former public relations professional and author, discusses the dire state of California, particularly regarding homelessness, addiction, and the political landscape. He ran for governor in 2018 against Gavin Newsom, motivated by a desire to address these pressing issues. Shellenberger highlights that homelessness in California is largely driven by untreated mental illness and addiction rather than poverty. He shares personal experiences and observations of the devastating conditions faced by homeless individuals, emphasizing the need for medical care and rehabilitation. He criticizes the state's approach, which he believes enables addiction through a victimhood ideology that discourages personal responsibility and recovery. The conversation also touches on the political dynamics in California, where progressive policies have led to increased crime rates and a lack of accountability for criminal behavior. Shellenberger notes that many Californians are frustrated with the current leadership and the failure to enforce laws, leading to a decline in public safety and quality of life. He argues that a shift in approach is necessary, advocating for a system that combines compassion with accountability, including the enforcement of laws against public drug use and homelessness. Shellenberger believes that California's issues reflect broader societal challenges, including a crisis of values and a need for reform in how addiction and mental health are addressed. He calls for a return to a pro-human agenda that emphasizes law and order, personal responsibility, and the importance of community support in overcoming adversity.

Tucker Carlson and Chris Moritz discuss the decline of California, highlighting the state's transformation from a prosperous region to one plagued by crime and dysfunction. Moritz attributes this decline to several factors, including the influence of criminal justice reform movements and specific legislative changes, such as the Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Plata, which mandated prison population reductions. This led to laws like AB 109, which transferred nonviolent offenders to county jails, ultimately resulting in increased crime rates and recidivism. Moritz points to the rise of juvenile crime, with gangs recruiting children as young as ten for violent crimes, and discusses the impact of Proposition 47, which reclassified thefts under $950 as misdemeanors and decriminalized drug possession. He argues that these laws, supported by figures like Kamala Harris, have contributed to a culture of impunity for criminals and have eroded public safety. The conversation also touches on the role of the Mexican drug cartels in California's criminal landscape, with Moritz asserting that they exert significant influence over the state's criminal economy. He describes how the cartels have taken control of drug distribution and violence, leading to a situation where local gangs are forced to adapt to survive. Moritz expresses concern over the political landscape, noting that California has become a one-party state characterized by corruption and inefficiency. He criticizes the lack of accountability for politicians who enact harmful policies and suggests that the current system is unsustainable. The discussion concludes with Moritz emphasizing the need for a return to effective governance and the importance of civic responsibility in preserving civilization.

Dave Rubin announces a shift of the Friday Roundtable to Thursdays, welcoming guests John Cardillo and Spencer Claven. They discuss President Biden's apparent cognitive decline, suggesting that his inability to read a teleprompter reflects broader concerns about his leadership. Cardillo notes the Democrats' dilemma regarding Biden's replacement, while Claven emphasizes the seriousness of the situation, likening it to elder abuse. The conversation shifts to college campuses, where protests have erupted in support of Hamas, with Rubin criticizing the media's handling of anti-Semitism. They highlight the role of outside agitators and the failure of university administrations to maintain order. Cardillo expresses frustration with the NYPD's limitations under current leadership, while Claven argues that the far-left's tactics are destructive and rooted in a hatred of America and Israel. They also touch on the implications of progressive policies in cities like Los Angeles, where crime is rising amid calls to reduce prison populations. The hosts conclude that the consequences of such policies are dire, with cities like San Francisco serving as cautionary tales for the future.

Megyn Kelly discusses two significant elections in California that could signal a shift in public sentiment against rising crime and homelessness. The primary race for Los Angeles Mayor features Democratic Congresswoman Karen Bass and billionaire developer Rick Caruso, who recently switched parties. The other critical election is the recall of San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, a progressive known for his lenient policies towards crime, which have led to increased lawlessness in the city. Guests David Sacks and Jason Calacanis, both influential figures in Silicon Valley, have been active in the effort to recall Boudin. They highlight that Boudin's election in 2019 was facilitated by low voter turnout and ranked-choice voting, and since then, his policies have resulted in chaos, with many residents feeling unsafe. Sacks notes that recent polling indicates a strong likelihood of Boudin's recall, as many San Franciscans express dissatisfaction with his approach to crime. Calacanis addresses criticisms that the recall effort is driven by wealthy Silicon Valley elites, asserting that the movement is fundamentally about local voters wanting to reclaim safety in their communities. He emphasizes that the majority of San Francisco is Democratic, and the recall is a grassroots response to Boudin's failure to enforce laws effectively. Both guests recount specific incidents that have outraged the public, particularly within the Asian American community, where violent crimes against elderly individuals have gone unpunished under Boudin's administration. They argue that the progressive agenda of decarceration, which Boudin embodies, has led to a dangerous environment, with criminals not facing appropriate consequences for their actions. The discussion also touches on broader implications for California politics, suggesting that a successful recall could indicate a shift away from extreme progressive policies towards more moderate approaches. They express hope that this could lead to a more balanced political landscape in the state. As the conversation shifts to the national context, they discuss the influence of George Soros in funding progressive district attorneys across the country, which has contributed to a nationwide trend of leniency towards crime. The guests argue that this trend has disproportionately affected marginalized communities, contradicting the intended goals of social justice. The episode concludes with a focus on the economic implications of these political shifts, particularly in light of rising crime rates and public safety concerns, which could impact voter behavior in upcoming elections.

In this episode of the All In podcast, hosts Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg discuss their recent controversial episode featuring Vlad Tenev from Robinhood. Chamath expresses his dissatisfaction with the content, feeling it lacked substance and was more of a PR stunt. The group debates the role of guests on the podcast, agreeing that they should focus on discussions rather than interviews, as they are not journalists but commentators. The conversation shifts to the political climate in San Francisco, particularly focusing on District Attorney Chesa Boudin. The hosts criticize Boudin's approach to criminal justice, arguing that his policies of decarceration have led to increased crime rates and repeat offenders being released without prosecution. They highlight specific cases, including recent violent incidents involving repeat offenders, attributing these issues to Boudin's failure to hold criminals accountable. The hosts also discuss the broader implications of Boudin's policies and the rise of similar approaches in other cities, such as Los Angeles. They express concern about the growing number of authoritarian regimes globally and the decline of democracies, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to criminal justice reform that includes accountability. The episode concludes with a discussion on the future of vaccinations in the U.S., with Friedberg noting that supply is not the issue but rather the distribution and policy surrounding vaccinations. The hosts express optimism about the potential for life to return to normal as vaccination efforts ramp up, while also addressing the psychological impact of the pandemic on people's willingness to return to pre-COVID activities. They end with a light-hearted discussion about future podcast plans and the importance of maintaining their unique voice.

California is portrayed as a cautionary tale in a wide-ranging interview centered on Chris Moritz’s new book, Failed State: A Portrait of California in the Twilight of an Empire, which argues that the state’s collapse stems from bureaucratic decay, ideological capture, and corporate influence. The conversation traverses exploding crime, crumbling infrastructure, housing chaos, and what Moritz describes as a permissive, pro-crime policy environment that began with landmark criminal justice reforms in the 2010s. The host and guest trace how policies intended to reduce incarceration instead flooded local jails, overwhelmed prosecutors, and empowered criminal enterprises. Moritz grounds his critique in personal experiences, including a home invasion and mounting storefront burglaries, to illustrate the erosion of safety and the disconnect between political rhetoric and everyday reality. Organized crime, juvenile recruitment by gangs, and the role of the Mexican Mafia in California’s prisons emerge as focal points. The dialogue delves into how cartels allegedly influence street-level crime and how reform-era laws, such as AB 109 and Prop 47, reshaped enforcement, sentencing, and public perception. The guests argue that the resulting chaos is not isolated to California but serves as a warning for blue cities nationwide, with widespread effects on real estate, business investment, and daily life. They discuss how technology firms, private security interests, and foreign investment purportedly intersect with domestic policy to amplify instability, prompting considerations of national security, sovereignty, and the future of urban governance. The episode weaves in anecdotes of personal crime, political branding, and media narratives, scrutinizing the tidal wave of policy branding like Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, and the alleged marketing tactics behind criminal justice reform. The conversation expands to concerns about homelessness, public safety funding, brush-fire preparedness, and environmental policy—areas Moritz claims are exploited to obscure deeper entanglements of money, power, and influence. A recurring theme is the tension between public alarm and political accountability, with Moritz and Michaels warning that neglecting root causes invites more displacement, higher crime, and a distorted sense of national direction. The discussion ends with a call to read the book for a fuller, sourced account of these complex dynamics. booksMentioned and discussed in detail include Failed State: A Portrait of California in the Twilight of an Empire by Chris Moritz.

On March 9, 2021, Dave Rubin discusses several pressing issues, starting with Joe Biden's apparent cognitive difficulties, highlighting his inability to remember names and locations, which he argues poses a national security risk. He criticizes mainstream media for not addressing these concerns, suggesting a reality disconnect for those only consuming traditional news sources. Rubin then critiques Don Lemon's commentary on racism within the British royal family, expressing concern over the dangerous implications of unchallenged accusations of racism. He also targets a New York Times piece on Senator Josh Hawley, arguing it unfairly relies on opinions from his past acquaintances rather than substantive evidence. Lastly, he addresses the closure of Walgreens in San Francisco due to rampant shoplifting, attributing it to lenient laws that treat theft under $950 as a misdemeanor, which he believes exacerbates crime and societal decay in progressive cities.