reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The federal criminal trial of Douglas Mackie began in Brooklyn, with charges stemming from memes he posted during the 2016 election. One meme encouraged Hillary Clinton supporters to "text Hillary" to a number. The FBI tracked down people who texted the number, but none remembered doing so. Mackie was arrested years later and charged with conspiring to interfere with citizens' rights, potentially facing a ten-year prison sentence. The DOJ's key witness is a member of Mackie's group chat who now works for the FBI, but Mackie's lawyers cannot fully cross-examine him or say his name in court. The DOJ claims disclosing the witness's identity would lead to online harassment. A Southern Poverty Law Center representative contacted a defense expert witness, George Hawley, questioned him about private emails, and threatened to write an article about him, leading Hawley to withdraw as a witness. The trial has been postponed.

I told someone that President Biden is more dangerous to the republic than Trump. Biden did something unprecedented, a court found he was censoring his opponents. No court has found Trump guilty of trying to steal the election or inciting insurrection, regardless of evidence. Biden censored me, and I won the suit, so this is a fact. Facebook admitted my posts were factually correct. They invented the term "malinformation" to describe my posts. This is factually correct information that is inconvenient for the government.

Speaker 0: Listen to this clip, Hannah, of what I said that was so dangerous and controversial. K. Keen Jeffries, a progressive congressman, literally tweeted, while the trial was going on, lock up Kyle Rittenhouse and throw away the key. And he's the same guy that rails against mass incarceration, and I agree with him on some of it. But now, before the trial's even over, they're calling for this guy to be locked up and throw away the key. Like, they've already reached their conclusion. Speaker 1: No. Didn't give him a fair shake. Speaker 0: It's a very ... And they lied about it being a white supremacy thing when it's a white dude that shot three other white people. It's the entire thing is bizarre and it's Out of self defense. Speaker 1: Right. Yes. Speaker 0: In my opinion. Speaker 1: That's most important. Speaker 0: The truth is he defended himself; he wasn't some mass shooter white supremacist, and he should be acquitted. Do you feel bullied? Speaker 1: I I don't. And honestly, I think that was the most milquetoast explanation of everything that went down.

People like me are experiencing what Trump faces. I'm being sued for displaying Trump flags. The left is using lawfare to suppress free speech, target opponents, and disrupt elections. Regular people, like the January 6ers and peaceful protesters, are facing unfair tactics and legal battles. Free speech is in danger.

Jerry Nadler and the Democrat party are committing treason. The wide open border and fentanyl overdoses are blamed on Biden voters. Protesters are being arrested to show censorship in the country. Impeach Trump protesters come without consequence, but others are arrested for silently standing with a sign. Trump won and action is being taken against the steal and reelection of 45 President Donald J. Trump. Thomas Jefferson said when the government fears the people, there is freedom. Evidence submitted includes a picture of someone with tape over their mouth and a sign saying they've been banned from social media. Owen Schroyer has been released from federal prison.

On one of the first days this show aired about the 50 states, a delegation to Israel visited, with people from state and local governments going to Israel, reportedly “humping the wall,” “licking the wall,” listening to speeches from Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli dignitaries, and being given instructions on how they would serve. The discussion then shifts to free speech and second amendment rights, setting the stage for the rest of the show. Jonathan Cagle, an American journalist known on X (formerly Twitter) with accounts such as decent backup, geez, decent JC, has been arrested. He is appearing today in a federal court, facing charges of cyberstalking. The report attributes the arrest to a group of “psychotic Zionists” who have been mass reporting him, attempting to have him kicked off the Internet and from various platforms, filing unpublished and videoed reports, and involving law enforcement. They have accused him of harassing, threatening, and stalking them, and now he faces federal charges. A central question raised is how many reports it takes to get arrested and jailed, and whether a “magic number” exists. The conversation notes X’s new program that flags accounts, suppresses content, and reduces reach, assigning scores (80%, 90%), thereby “snuffing out” visibility. The discussion asks if a coordinated online group can push someone into being arrested, just by accusing them of cyberstalking or other offenses. There is a GoFundMe-style fundraising page linked to Jonathan Cagle’s mother, Lisa Cagle, who states: “I’m Lisa Cagle, and my son needs help with a legal matter as he is a patriot fighting for America's future. He has a platform on X and is joined by so many that share the same passion for the great USA. Any donation is greatly appreciated. We’re raising legal funds to help cover the legal defense of a man facing serious federal charges that raise important questions about free speech, due process, and the proper limits of government power. The case is complex, high stakes, and emotionally taxing, not just for him, but for his family and loved ones. Federal cases move quickly, require specialized legal expertise, and are extremely expensive to defend properly. Without strong representation, the system can overwhelm even those who believe deeply in their innocence. This fundraiser is not about relitigating the case online or attacking anyone involved. It’s about ensuring that every person, regardless of public opinion, has access to a vigorous, competent defense as guaranteed by the constitution. Legal fees for federal defenses can include, and there’s this list here, and I mean, it’s every step of the way. Every contribution, no matter the size, helps ensure that this case is decided in a courtroom based on facts and law, not by financial imbalance or fear. If you’re unable to donate, sharing this page is also deeply appreciated.” The narrative notes that federal court proceedings are challenging due to the government’s resources, and it references the J6 situation, where participants were uprooted from their homes and faced severe sentences, implying a concern about intimidation by federal power. The discussion promises to follow the case and provide updates on the court hearing and further information about what is happening, given the large online attack from accounts on X that have targeted Jonathan to destroy him, making it difficult to discern the facts. The overarching theme is concern over free speech, due process, and the proper limits of government power in the face of online amplification and organized reporting campaigns.

Two years ago today on 10/17/2023, I was sentenced to sixty days in prison for trespassing outside the capital on J sixth. The judge during my sentencing said that I misused my platform as a candidate for elected office. If you don't know, my name is Ryan Kelly. I was the leading gubernatorial candidate in the state of Michigan in 2022 when the FBI raided my house on 06/09/2022, and they arrested me on misdemeanor charges, nonviolent, never even went inside the Capitol Building, was the leading gubernatorial candidate, election interference. I was the best poised to beat Whitmer. But, anyway, that's the point of all of this right now. The judge said that I had a lot of folks that followed me. I had a lot of folks that supported me. And with that comes the responsibility of not peddling lies and falsehoods. And he was talking about the twenty twenty election because I said it was a fraudulent stolen election. He was talking about January 6 because I said that the January 6 that there was FBI agents there that were setting the whole thing up and involved in the crowd. And what did we find out here recently? Oh, I was right, but I was sentenced to sixty days in prison for that. One of the biggest things the judge brought up that he had a huge problem with the Facebook posts that I had. Right? Freedom of speech. Poof. Gone. Kings do that kind of stuff. They don't let their people talk freely. Is that right? And then on top of that, you know, lying and misleading all of my supporters when we come to now find out there was 274 agents that were in the crowd that day on January 6. You know, it's obvious that the Democrats are the tyrants, the kings, if you will. Right? I mean, look at what they did with Kamala in the primary. Right? I don't need to explain it to y'all. But, you know, here we are. The Trump administration is removing illegal immigrants from our country and doing good things for America. It was the Biden administration, the Democrats that targeted American citizens. Red, white, and blue. Let's go USA.

Tim Hazelow, a Republican ballot observer and Trump supporter in Island County, Washington, was convicted on trespassing and unlawful entry of an election center, a felony. The charges stem from Hazelow's refusal to wear a COVID mask while observing ballot counting in 2024, after which he was escorted out by law enforcement. The elected prosecutor, Greg Banks, known for his anti-Trump sentiments and wishing death on those not wearing masks, personally prosecuted the case after Hazelow refused to plead guilty to a misdemeanor. The speaker argues this is a political prosecution, highlighting that Banks compared Trump supporters to Nazis and wished death on people who don't wear masks. The defense was limited, as the judge deemed the prosecutor's bias and evidence of others not wearing masks irrelevant. Another Republican ballot observer, Tracy Abdul, faces similar felony charges. The speaker calls for a better defense team for Hazelow's appeal, as a felony conviction could impact his security clearance and lead to jail time.

There is a discussion about government censorship on Twitter. Speaker 0 claims there is no evidence of government censorship of lawful speech. Speaker 1 presents an email from the Biden administration requesting the removal of a tweet. Speaker 0 asks for the tweet to be read, but it is not available. Speaker 1 argues that the tweet was about lawful speech because it was from Robert Kennedy Jr. Speaker 1 accuses the administration of trying to censor speech. The discussion continues, with Speaker 1 requesting the tweet to be entered into the record. The video ends with Speaker 1 mentioning the tweet was about Hank Aaron's death after receiving the vaccine.

Doug Mackey, a man who made fun of Hillary Clinton on Twitter during the 2016 election, shares his shocking story of being indicted and convicted by the federal government. He was arrested by the FBI and faced the possibility of 10 years in prison for a tweet that was deemed a crime. The government claimed that his tweet was an effort to mislead people about voting. However, there was no evidence that anyone's vote was actually subverted. Despite the lack of evidence, Mackey was convicted based on his alleged intent. The media, including the Huffington Post, played a role in his arrest by revealing his true identity. Mackey questions the state of free speech in the country and the dangerous precedent set by his case.

The speaker claims they are attacked for not believing in democracy, but the most sacred right in the U.S. democracy is the First Amendment. They state that Kamala Harris wants to threaten the power of the government, and there is no First Amendment right to misinformation. The speaker believes big tech silences people, which is a threat to democracy. They want Democrats and Republicans to reject censorship and persuade one another by arguing about ideas. The speaker references yelling fire in a crowded theater as the Supreme Court test. They accuse others of wanting to kick people off Facebook for saying toddlers shouldn't get masks.

Tim Hazelow, a Republican ballot observer and Trump supporter in Island County, Washington, was convicted on trespassing and unlawful entry of an election center, a felony. The charges stem from Hazelow's refusal to wear a COVID mask while observing ballot counting in 2024, after which he was escorted out by law enforcement. The elected prosecutor, Greg Banks, known for his anti-Trump sentiments and wishing death on those not wearing masks, personally prosecuted the case after Hazelow refused to plead guilty to a misdemeanor. The speaker asserts Banks should have recused himself. During the trial, the judge disallowed key pieces of evidence, including Banks' political bias and the fact that others in the ballot counting area were unmasked but not charged. The speaker believes the felony charge is a political prosecution that could ruin Hazelow's life and is seeking a better defense team for his appeal, as well as for Tracy Abdul, another Republican ballot observer facing similar charges.

I'm here instead of campaigning due to a court case. The prosecution has no evidence of a crime, and experts believe the case should be dismissed. The trial is seen as an attack on Biden and a political move. The justice system is being questioned, and the judge is criticized for bias. Many feel it's a miscarriage of justice and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is viewed as corrupt and unfair. Thank you. Translation: The speaker is not campaigning due to a court case where the prosecution lacks evidence of a crime. Experts suggest dismissing the case. The trial is seen as a political attack on Biden, questioning the justice system and criticizing the biased judge. Many view it as unjust and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is perceived as corrupt and unfair. Thank you.

I believe President Biden is a much worse threat to democracy than Trump. Biden is the first president to use federal agencies to censor political speech, targeting opponents. I won a case proving he censored me shortly after taking office. The greatest threat to democracy isn't questioning election returns, but using presidential power to force social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to censor political critics through portals accessible to the FBI, CIA, IRS, and other agencies. Biden also weaponized the Secret Service, denying protection to a political opponent for political reasons. These are critical threats because he is weaponizing federal agencies.

I am a political prisoner of Nancy Pelosi, Merrick Garland, and Joe Biden. They lie about everything, including the president's health, the 2020 election, and COVID. We must fight back to stop their corruption and lies. If they try to send me to prison, we will continue the fight.

I made a joke on social media about Hillary Clinton and ended up in front of a judge, being accused of threatening her. The joke was about using DNA analysis on a sample of her hair to determine if she's a lizard person, which was obviously a joke. But apparently, making fun of Hillary Clinton has its limits under the first amendment. I learned that the first amendment is a qualified right with strong limits.

FBI agents admit to interrogating Americans daily about social media posts, sparking concerns over free speech. A woman questioned agents about criticism of Israel leading to a visit over an internet meme. The woman refused to talk without her lawyer present. The video highlights the FBI's increasing involvement in monitoring online speech. The speaker also discusses intimidation tactics by companies to force conformity. The transcript ends with a promotion for emergency food kits and a call to protect free speech.

A man is going to federal prison for sharing a meme during the meme wars of 20. The meme made a joke about Hillary Clinton supporters being too unintelligent to vote by text. It was meant as satire and did not actually convince anyone to vote incorrectly. The Department of Justice couldn't find anyone who believed the meme or voted on the wrong day. In contrast, a Chinese American Trump supporter named Christina Wong made a similar joke about voting for Trump on November 9th, but she faced no consequences. This highlights a double standard and the political prosecution of speech.

The speaker claims that individuals from the Biden administration would call and berate their team about certain documents. The speaker says that emails related to this are published. The speaker states that their team refused to take down content that was true, including a meme about potential class action lawsuits related to COVID vaccines. They also refused to remove humor and satire. The speaker alleges that President Biden made a statement suggesting "these guys are killing people," after which various government agencies began investigating their company, which they describe as "brutal."

The speaker sued the Biden administration and won. According to the speaker, discovery revealed that 37 hours after Biden's inauguration, a White House group was appointed to censor the speaker and others. The speaker claims to have emails between this group and Mark Zuckerberg, as well as people at Twitter. The speaker credits Elon Musk with making these emails public and believes Musk is essential to free speech in the U.S. because he opened up Twitter. The speaker states that Musk released these documents to journalists against the advice of his attorneys.

The speakers discuss the use of Soviet-style tactics to silence opposition and the fear it instills in people. They mention a case in Michigan where defendants were charged with attempting to interfere with the election process. The prosecutor argues that even if the defendants believed they were acting patriotically, it does not justify violating the law. The second speaker clarifies that their intention was to be alternate state electors if Donald Trump won the state.

Former Vice President Mike Pence is scheduled to testify, and the night before his testimony, the defendant tweets, "Mike Pence can still fix this. Mike Pence can still do the right thing if he says the right stuff tomorrow." The question is whether this tweet counts as communication with a witness. The response is that it depends on the context. If it's just a statement of political speech on social media, it's likely not considered communication. The district court can only prohibit it if there is compelling evidence of an actual threat to the administration of justice. There can't be a blanket rule prohibiting any mention of Mike Pence.

Project Veritas sued me for a preliminary injunction, but the federal judge ruled in my favor. I refused a deal to limit my speech, testified for hours, and just won the case. Project Veritas is still trying to silence me, but I will not be silenced. I will never agree to any deal that restricts my first amendment rights. We are releasing a story about the DNC this afternoon. Translation: I was sued by Project Veritas, but the judge ruled in my favor. I rejected a speech-limiting deal, testified, and won the case. Despite Project Veritas's efforts to silence me, I will not be silenced. I will never agree to any deal that restricts my right to free speech. We will release a story about the DNC later today.