reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers express concern about the limited reporting of adverse reactions to vaccines. They highlight a report suggesting that only 5% of adverse reactions are recorded in the database. Despite this, they emphasize the safety of the COVID vaccine and assure viewers that it is safe. They also compare the number of adverse event reports for all vaccines in New Zealand, which is typically around 1500 a year, with the low number of deaths reported following vaccination.

Over 1.6 million adverse event reports have been filed to VAERS for COVID-19 vaccines, with a significant increase in 2021. The underreporting factor is estimated to be around 31 for severe events like hospitalizations and death. The speaker believes the mRNA platform was used to gather data for future gene therapy applications.

Behind the scenes communications from the BC Centre for Disease Control revealed that COVID-19 vaccines were 16 times more dangerous than flu shots for children. The data was manipulated before being released to the public, omitting comparisons to flu vaccines and downplaying serious adverse events. This lack of transparency raises concerns about health regulators withholding vital information from the public.

The presentation examines the pattern of deployment of toxic vaccine batches using the VAERS dataset. It notes that the Covid vaccine was deployed in batches or lots, each with a number, and the batches are listed in VAERS in the order they were created, with adverse reactions recorded for each batch. A graph was produced with adverse reactions on the vertical axis and the sequence of batches in time on the horizontal axis, showing patterns of deployment in 2021. Each dot represents a batch, and the speaker highlights that about 95% of batches lie close to the x-axis, forming a thick line, with 80% of all batches generating only one or two adverse reaction reports and thus considered harmless. In contrast, the “clouds” and spikes above the x-axis represent toxic batches, with all such dots categorized as toxic. The breakdown given is: - 5% of all batches belong to these clouds and spikes. - The truly toxic batches generate 1,000 to 5,000 adverse reaction reports and are found above a red line, causing harm across every state in the USA where deployed. - These very toxic batches comprise about 0.65% of all batches (roughly one in 200). Total batches deployed in 2021 and recorded in VAERS: 28,330. Eighty percent are harmless (1–2 reports) within the x-axis line; the remaining 20% are more toxic, with the most extreme range up to 5,000 reports. Lesson two asks: “Who did it?” It identifies three companies appearing in VAERS: Moderna, Pfizer, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson). By filtering VAERS data in Excel, the speaker presents the contributions of each company to the toxic-batch deployment. In the full picture, Moderna accounts for every batch in the first half of the chart except two spikes pre- and post- Moderna, which are attributed to Janssen. Pfizer’s results (from their batches) match the latter half of the chart exactly, suggesting Pfizer appeared to have taken over supply for every USA batch in the latter portion. The deployment is described as carefully compartmentalized, with phases where Janssen, then Moderna, then Janssen again, and then Pfizer dominate in sequence, followed by Moderna exiting and Pfizer continuing. Lesson three describes the purpose behind Moderna’s deployment of toxic batches: Moderna appears to randomly distribute toxic batches, with the intention of harm, possibly to induce fear of a pandemic and justify stronger policies. Janssen’s initial spike is interpreted as a test before Moderna’s deployment. Pfizer is described as carrying out rigorous dosage testing, deploying the most lethal batches systematically and recording effects, and acting as the only company administering batches at that stage to avoid interference from others. Lesson four details the fine art of lethal dosage testing. Pfizer’s deployment is shown as highly clustered in time, forming distinct periods of toxic batches separated by intervals of harmless batches. Toxic batches cluster in discrete ranges (e.g., 3,000–2,500; 2,000–1,500; 1,500–1,000), with abrupt transitions between clusters and harmless periods. Toxicity ranges are not random but follow a stepwise, linear decline across clusters. The speaker concludes that Pfizer deployed highly toxic batches for discrete dosage testing across all states, implying thousands of hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths. The presentation ends by contrasting that 80% of batches are harmless, while a minority exhibit wide toxicity ranges, with claims of systematic, non-random deployment designed for testing, and notes an ironic statement about American exposure to what is described as German-led testing.

I am Max Melling, the statistician behind this study, with Viveke as the medical expert. The main result of our study is shown on the screen. It displays the number of adverse effects in each vaccine batch, based on official Danish data created for the study. Some batches are small, while others are large. Normally, a good vaccine would show a nearly perfect line, while a very bad vaccine would have scattered points. However, we observe three almost perfect lines, which is unexpected and suggests a problem with the product. Participants were unable to give informed consent due to the unknown risks. This is a concerning safety signal that requires further investigation.

A recent report from the OECD reveals that nearly half a million children and young adults have died since COVID vaccines were approved, with over 118,000 deaths suspected to be linked to vaccine side effects. Despite this alarming data, mainstream media remains silent. Throughout 2021, officials, including President Biden and Dr. Fauci, claimed vaccines were safe and effective for all ages, asserting they would protect children from mild symptoms. They promoted the idea that vaccinated individuals would not transmit the virus, but evidence shows they lacked data to support these claims. When questioned about the vaccine's ability to stop transmission before its release, officials admitted they did not have that information. This has led to widespread distrust among those who recognize the inconsistencies in the narrative surrounding the pandemic and the vaccines.

The Office of National Statistics used to release data on deaths in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, but no longer does. Calls for anonymized record level data have been made to analyze deaths after vaccination. Data from the Czech Republic shows Moderna vaccine linked to 50% more deaths than Pfizer. Questions raised about safety of COVID vaccines, especially Moderna. Governments urged to release record level data to determine if vaccines are causing excess deaths and increase in emergency calls since vaccine rollout in May 2021.

In January, a federal judge ordered the CDC to release text entries from a survey where individuals shared their experiences after receiving the COVID vaccine. The first two batches, totaling 780,000 reports from about 523,000 people, revealed numerous health issues, including heart inflammation, facial paralysis, and tinnitus. The data showed a variety of post-vaccination problems, such as miscarriages and seizures. For example, one report described a loss of consciousness and seizure immediately after the injection, while another mentioned a diagnosis of Bell's palsy due to facial numbness and paralysis.

The speaker discusses the underreporting of adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccines in the VAERS database, highlighting safety signals like myocarditis and death. They compare the number of deaths reported to VAERS to past incidents that prompted product removal, questioning why COVID-19 vaccines have not been halted. The speaker presents data showing a significant increase in adverse events with COVID-19 vaccines compared to other vaccines, particularly in younger age groups. They emphasize the need to follow standard procedures for analyzing safety signals and suggest that the CDC, HHS, and FDA are not properly addressing the issue.

The largest vaccine study ever conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network revealed increased risks of adverse events post-COVID vaccination. Risks include brain swelling, blood clots, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and myocarditis. Critics like Del Bigtree highlight concerns about the vaccine's safety, emphasizing the potential risks of various adverse events. The study's conclusion suggests higher risks post-vaccination but lacks transparency in data sharing. The importance of discussing these findings lies in potential future mandated products and the need to address adverse effects openly. The Wellness Company promotes medical emergency kits for preparedness in various health crises.

There have been unprecedented injuries, disabilities, and deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. By January 22, 2021, 182 deaths were reported to the US vaccine adverse event reporting system. The FDA and CDC, who co-administer the program, lack experience in vaccine campaigns. Pfizer knew about 1,223 deaths within 90 days of their vaccine but kept it confidential. Moderna has not released their data. There are over 34,100 peer-reviewed papers on vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths.

The speaker found that the COVID vaccine has triggered 770 safety signals in the Veris system, a record number. The CDC failed to disclose this information, showing corruption. They refuse to provide access to data for analysis, preventing transparency. The speaker believes the vaccines are causing harm and increasing the risk of death. Access to data is restricted under the Freedom of Information Act, hindering efforts to uncover the truth. Cooperation and transparency are needed for scientific inquiry. Translation: The speaker discusses the alarming number of safety signals triggered by the COVID vaccine and criticizes the CDC for withholding this information. They highlight the lack of transparency in accessing data for analysis and express concerns about the vaccines' impact on public health. Collaboration and openness are essential for scientific investigation.

In November 2022, Medsafe discontinued regular reports on adverse events following COVID injections in New Zealand. They acknowledged that the reporting system captures only a small fraction of the actual number of adverse events. By that time, Medsafe had received 65,000 adverse event reports, suggesting that around 1.3 million New Zealanders experienced adverse events. Among these reports, there were 3,688 serious cases, nearly 6,000 for young people aged 5 to 19, and 184 deaths. The numbers of adverse events and deaths following COVID injections far exceed those from other vaccines. Similar trends are observed globally, with thousands of deaths and millions of adverse event reports for COVID vaccines. The impact on individuals and families is significant and unprecedented.

The speaker discusses a paper from Denmark that reveals a significant variation in suspected adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. The data shows a 1,000-fold difference in incidence depending on the batch of vaccines administered. This information is currently gaining popularity.

The speaker expresses concern that only 5% of adverse reactions are reported in the database, suggesting it's just the tip of the iceberg. Another speaker reassures that the vaccine is safe and there is no evidence of it causing deaths. Prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, an average of 1500 adverse event reports were received annually for all vaccines in New Zealand, resulting in one or fewer reported deaths per year.

A renowned expert in immunology and infectious disease, Eric Rubin, emphasized the need to administer vaccines to truly understand their safety. However, public health officials have never released detailed safety data for any vaccine, making it impossible to determine the truth. On November 9th, 2023, a whistleblower from the New Zealand Ministry of Health uploaded record-level vaccine data to a cloud server. This unprecedented release, known as Operation MOAR, revealed the true extent of vaccine-related deaths worldwide, with 13 million people killed. YouTube swiftly removed a video discussing this data, highlighting their bias towards promoting a false narrative. The data, now available for download, provides an opportunity for individuals to analyze it themselves and draw their own conclusions.

The CDC planned to analyze VAERS data for COVID-19 vaccine safety signals using Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), where a score above two would trigger further inquiry. ICANN requested the PRR results via FOIA and found "incredibly concerning results," with some harms having PRRs of 30, 50, or 100. The CDC then switched to Empirical Bayesian (EB) analysis by the FDA. ICANN requested this data via FOIA, leading to two federal lawsuits before the data was released. This data was also "very concerning." Both the PRR analysis and the EB data are available on the ICANN website. The speaker encourages independent scientists to analyze and publish on the data, which confirms "incredibly concerning reports of harm from the COVID-19 vaccine." The speaker claims federal health officials hid this data from the public.

The speakers express concern that only a small percentage of adverse reactions to vaccines are reported. Despite this, they assure viewers that the COVID vaccine is safe. They highlight that prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, an average of 1500 adverse event reports were received each year for all vaccines in New Zealand, resulting in one or fewer reported deaths annually.

The speaker discusses the reliability of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is used by the CDC to test vaccine safety. They explain that VAERS is a poor system because it relies on voluntary reporting from doctors, who often do not see the connection between a vaccine and adverse events. The speaker suggests that a machine counting system would be more effective. Despite its limitations, VAERS has reported more deaths and injuries from vaccines since 1986 than any other vaccine in history, making it the most dangerous vaccine according to CDC's measure.

We have found more adverse effects than officially reported from the COVID vaccine. Serious harms and deaths are at unprecedented levels. We are committed to compensating those affected, but the financial burden should not fall on taxpayers. Our goal is to fight for justice for vaccinated individuals, expose discrimination against the unvaccinated, and reveal the truth about the COVID pandemic and vaccine safety.

As of February 2024, the number of reports for COVID-19 vaccines in VAERS is significantly higher than all other vaccines combined since 1990. The government was not fully prepared for this overwhelming influx of reports. They had to quickly reassign people and hold numerous meetings to increase their capacity to review these reports.

The Bijwerkingen Centrum Laab hides their own side effects on their website. They make it seem like the side effects of the corona vaccines are not a big deal, but if you scroll down, you'll find that they mention the rare condition called GianBareé syndrome. However, the real information is hidden further down. Instead of clicking on the syringe icon, you should click on "Klik hier voor een overzicht van alle vaccins" to see the mRNA vaccines. There, you'll find information on specific topics like pregnancy, where they mention 256 spontaneous miscarriages. They have cleverly hidden this information. Translation: The Bijwerkingen Centrum Laab hides their own side effects on their website. They make it seem like the side effects of the corona vaccines are not a big deal, but if you scroll down, you'll find that they mention the rare condition called GianBareé syndrome. However, the real information is hidden further down. Instead of clicking on the syringe icon, you should click on "Click here for an overview of all vaccines" to see the mRNA vaccines. There, you'll find information on specific topics like pregnancy, where they mention 256 spontaneous miscarriages. They have cleverly hidden this information.

A Pfizer whistleblower has revealed documents indicating over 158,000 reports of adverse reactions from December 2020 to February 2021, including serious issues like spontaneous abortions. This raises concerns about the intentional release of the vaccine and the knowledge of its potential to cause severe health problems, including heart attacks and infertility. The FDA's efforts to keep these documents hidden for 75 years suggest awareness of these dangers. The continued availability of the vaccine is alarming, especially considering that other vaccines have been removed for far fewer adverse cases. Those involved in this situation must be held accountable.

We are vaccinating millions, and while there are reports of deaths following vaccinations, there is no evidence that the vaccine causes these deaths. Adverse reactions must be reported, but many go unreported, potentially skewing data. For instance, only 5% of adverse reactions may reach the monitoring database. There have been serious cases, including hospitalizations, that are not being documented properly. Despite the numbers, experts assert that the vaccine is safe and effective. It's crucial for the public to understand that while adverse events will occur, they are often coincidental. The vaccine remains vital for public health, and getting vaccinated is strongly encouraged.

The speakers express concern about the limited reporting of adverse reactions to vaccines. They mention a report suggesting that only 5% of adverse reactions are recorded in the database. Despite this, they assure viewers that the COVID vaccine is safe. They highlight that prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, the average number of adverse event reports for all vaccines in New Zealand was 1500 per year, with one or fewer deaths reported annually.