TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A journalist contacts Homeland Security to inquire about troubling systems. The speaker is directed to submit a report on assista.gov or dhs.gov. When asked why they can't answer questions, the speaker explains that the number is only for government agencies. The journalist expresses concern about Ericsson's involvement with ISIS and the lawsuit filed by veterans. The speaker suggests reporting the issue to pincident.gov or ic3.gov. The journalist asks about the interconnection of systems and the role of the FBI. The speaker advises reporting to local FBI offices and mentions the importance of reporting to IC3 for analytics. The journalist mentions the patent sharing agreement between Ericsson and Huawei. The speaker suggests reporting to IC3 for international matters. The journalist expresses fear and asks about CISA's role in cybersecurity incidents. The speaker explains that CISA mainly focuses on government agencies and suggests visiting cisco.gov for more information. The journalist questions the taxpayer's role in supporting agencies that protect corporations. The speaker acknowledges the concern and the call ends.

Ericsson, a foreign telecommunications company, has been involved in various controversial activities. They sponsored and bribed ISIS for over 17 years, leading to the deaths of American soldiers. Ericsson also controls the flow of information and data, including financial transactions and classified information, through their ownership of the portability cables. The company operates outside of US jurisdiction and has no oversight. The transfer of contracts from Neustar to Ericsson was overseen by Timothy Geithner and Hillary Clinton during the Obama administration. The Swedish British Crown took over the contract in 2013, making it difficult to hold Ericsson accountable. The Trump administration was unable to stop this due to ongoing investigations and the non-governmental nature of the contract.

The report concludes with a real-time example of emergency services failing during the Las Vegas shooting on October 1, 2017. A woman, trying to call for help, could only reach her boyfriend miles away due to a security perimeter around the active shooter situation. This highlights the critical need for reliable communication during emergencies, as it affects not just individuals but families and communities. The importance of ensuring American infrastructure is under American control is emphasized, and there is a call for senators and government officials to take these issues seriously. Gratitude is expressed to Mark Rinchem for facilitating this discussion and providing supporting evidence.

The speaker calls Homeland Security as a journalist seeking information about troubling systems. They are directed to submit an inquiry on the government website. The speaker expresses concern about Ericsson's involvement with ISIS and the lawsuit filed by veterans. They question why government officials are not taking action. Homeland Security provides resources to report the issue to the FBI and suggests contacting local news outlets. The conversation touches on the interconnection of systems and the role of different agencies. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of support for individuals who experience cyberattacks. They discuss the patent sharing agreement between Ericsson and Huawei and mention reporting to the FBI. The speaker concludes by questioning the role of CISA and the taxpayer's support of agencies that protect corporations.

An Israeli intelligence-founded company, First Health Infrastructure, partnered with CISA to protect critical infrastructure in the US, including hospitals, dams, water systems, and nuclear reactors. This foreign entity's access to vital American systems raises concerns about national security and the extent of Israeli influence.

Hundreds of intelligence community members work at social media companies. Mainstream news outlets confirmed my reporting on the laptop story. The censorship was due to the truth being a threat to power. The US government's influence on corporations undermines the first amendment. Our response will determine the future of a free press. Thank you. Translation: Many intelligence community members work at social media companies. News outlets confirmed my reporting on the laptop story. Censorship was due to the truth being a threat. The US government's influence on corporations undermines freedom of speech. Our response will determine the future of a free press. Thank you.

An Israeli intelligence company called First Health Infrastructure partnered with CISA, an organization responsible for protecting critical infrastructure in the US. Originally focused on American hospitals, they have expanded their services to include dams, water systems, and nuclear reactors. This foreign intelligence-founded nonprofit now has access to these crucial systems in the United States. The deep connections between Israel and the US seem to play a role in allowing this partnership.

The speaker mentions that they have shared information with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regarding their findings. They have a relationship with local DHS personnel and have provided them with a significant amount of data. The DHS conducted scans and determined vulnerabilities. However, the speaker notes that the Elections division of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) did not participate in internal meetings or briefings on the presented material.

A staff member from Senator Lankford's office called in response to a message about investigating Ericsson and national security. They thanked the caller for flagging the issue and informed them that the matter has been forwarded to the foreign policy and telecom staff. The staff member offered to answer any further questions or discuss the issue in more detail. They provided contact information for the office and expressed gratitude before ending the call.

A journalist contacts Homeland Security to inquire about troubling systems. The representative directs the journalist to submit a report on assista.gov or dhs.gov. The journalist expresses concern about Ericsson's involvement with ISIS and the lawsuit filed by veterans. The representative suggests reporting the issue to pincident.gov and ic3.gov. The journalist asks about the interconnection of emergency systems and the role of the FBI. The representative advises reporting to local FBI offices and mentions the importance of reporting to IC3 for analytics. The journalist mentions the patent sharing agreement between Ericsson and Huawei. The representative suggests reporting to IC3 for international matters. The journalist expresses fear and asks about CISA's role in cybersecurity incidents. The representative clarifies that CISA focuses on government agencies and suggests visiting cisco.gov for more information. The journalist questions the taxpayer's role in supporting agencies that protect corporations. The representative acknowledges the concern. The call ends.

A journalist contacts Homeland Security to inquire about troubling systems. The speaker is directed to submit an inquiry or report on the official government websites. When asked why they can't answer questions, the speaker explains that the number is only for government agencies. The journalist expresses concern about Ericsson's involvement with ISIS and the lawsuit filed by veterans. The speaker suggests reporting the issue to pincident.gov and Ic3.gov, which is handled by the FBI. The journalist asks about the interconnection of emergency systems and the role of NCSWIC. The speaker clarifies that they handle cybersecurity issues for government agencies, while local jurisdictions report incidents to the FBI. The journalist questions the effectiveness of reporting and mentions the patent sharing agreement between Ericsson and Huawei. The speaker advises contacting the local FBI for further details. The journalist expresses fear and asks about CISA's role in protecting individuals. The speaker explains that CISA primarily focuses on government agencies and corporations, not individual cases. The journalist comments on taxpayers funding agencies to protect corporations and third parties. The conversation ends abruptly.

Speaker 0 states their interactions with the NSA are very limited, adding the NSA is not an agency that works with you directly. Speaker 0 mentions reading in newspapers about their phone being penetrated with Pegasus, but has no idea if it's true, stating this is the only source of information they have about themselves personally. Speaker 0 assumes by default that the devices they use are compromised and has very limited faith in platforms developed in the US from a security standpoint and privacy standpoint.

The speaker expresses gratitude to Dr. Jen and discusses the involvement of various companies, including Ericsson, Google, Amazon, Verizon, AT&T, and Telkordia Technologies, in a complex situation related to spying and cybersecurity. They highlight the significance of Georgia and the expiration of Pfizer's contract, as well as the connection between the Obama administration, Joe Biden, and the ordering of the spying. The speaker also mentions Dimitri Alperovitch's background in cybersecurity and the importance of the truth. They touch on the Georgia case, fraudulent votes, and the control exerted by Ericsson in the telecommunications industry. The speaker emphasizes the need to take action and regain power.

New details have emerged about a major cyber hack attributed to Chinese government-affiliated hackers, who compromised multiple US communications companies. The FBI reports that these hackers accessed sensitive records, intercepted voice calls, and even infiltrated the Justice Department's wiretap system. Most intercepted communications involved government or political figures, raising concerns about the vulnerability of nearly all Americans' communications. Officials advise using encrypted messaging apps like Signal, WhatsApp, or iMessage for secure communication. The hacking group, known as Salt Typhoon, is linked to previous attacks on political campaigns. Understanding the risks of digital connectivity is crucial, as it can be exploited against us. China has denied these hacking claims and accused the US of spreading disinformation.

The speaker expresses gratitude to Dr. Jen and discusses the involvement of various companies, including Ericsson, Google, Amazon, Verizon, AT&T, and Telkordia Technologies, in a complex situation related to spying and cybersecurity. They highlight the importance of Georgia and the expiration of Pfizer's contract in December. The speaker also mentions the connection between the Obama administration, Joe Biden, and the ordering of the spying, as well as the significance of Georgia Tech and the FISA piece. They express concern about the lack of focus on the truth and emphasize the need for understanding and action. The speaker concludes by discussing fraudulent votes, the company Neustar, and the control exerted by Ericsson in the telecommunications industry. They mention a civil case against Ericsson and the company's involvement with ISIS. The speaker suggests the importance of taking back power and mentions the Nashville RV explosion and the need for secure satellite communications.

The caller, Michael Khoury, reports a federal violation involving the Swedish telecommunications company Ericsson. He claims that Ericsson has admitted to funding and sponsoring ISIS for over 17 years. Michael believes that Ericsson's control over critical infrastructure, including the 911 system, is causing issues with emergency services. He has written a report on the matter and plans to speak before Congress. Michael also mentions that Ericsson has been sued for aiding in the killing of American soldiers. He provides details about Ericsson's subsidiary, Iconnective, and their contract with the FCC. Michael expresses concerns about the compromised security and urges action to address the situation.

A staff member from Senator Lankford's office called in response to a message about investigating Ericsson and national security. They thanked the caller for flagging the issue and informed them that the message was forwarded to the foreign policy and telecom staff. The staff member offered to answer any further questions or discuss the matter. They provided contact information for callbacks or submitting another message through a government website. The call ended with gratitude and well wishes.

When dialing 911, your call is routed through iConnective, a subsidiary of Ericsson. An investigation revealed that Ericsson sought permission from ISIS to operate in their territories and engaged in corrupt practices in Iraq, leading to a $1 billion settlement with the U.S. Justice Department. Despite acknowledging their misconduct, Ericsson faced minimal accountability for executives involved. The investigation raised concerns about national security, especially given Ericsson’s control over critical telecommunications infrastructure. The lack of oversight allows potential vulnerabilities, as evidenced by past emergency failures. Current lawsuits involve families of veterans who died due to these failures, highlighting the urgent need for accountability and reform in telecommunications governance. The interconnectedness of these issues underscores the risks posed by foreign control over essential services.

The speaker accuses the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of causing harm and failing to distinguish between domestic and foreign speech. They criticize the DHS for record levels of illegal immigration, declining deportations, and drug-related incidents. The speaker also mentions the cybersecurity and infrastructure agency (CISA) colluding with social media companies to censor free speech, as stated in a court opinion. When questioned, the DHS representative claims to be unaware of the court opinion but acknowledges being briefed on the Missouri litigation. The speaker questions the representative about the existence of the misinformation and disinformation subcommittee and who determines what is false. The representative denies involvement in censorship and states that CISA focuses on identifying tactics used by foreign nations to weaponize disinformation. The speaker disputes this, referring to the court's findings. The conversation ends due to time constraints.

Speaker 1 discusses government interference in news coverage at CBS, citing pressure from political officials to shape stories. They mention feeling pressure from employers to withhold stories due to calls from officials, even if the content was accurate. Speaker 1 suggests a policy where officials must submit objections in writing rather than through phone calls. They express concern about intelligence agencies violating rights without sufficient oversight. Speaker 0 thanks Speaker 1 for their input. Translation: Speaker 1 talks about government influence on news coverage at CBS, highlighting pressure from political officials to manipulate stories. They mention feeling pressured by employers to hold back stories due to calls from officials, even if the content was accurate. Speaker 1 proposes a policy where officials must submit objections in writing instead of through phone calls. They express worry about intelligence agencies violating rights without proper oversight. Speaker 0 thanks Speaker 1 for their insights.

The cybersecurity and intelligence components within the Department of Homeland Security have been overly siloed. There has been insufficient communication and collaboration with other intelligence agencies. While there is some interaction with INA, more partnership is needed to enhance effectiveness.

In 2009, Ericsson faced pressure for selling telecom equipment to oppressive governments. They sponsored a speech by Bill Clinton, paying him $750,000. In 2012, the Obama administration imposed sanctions on telecom sales to Iran and Syria, but Ericsson's work in Iran was not covered. The speaker, Laura Logan, discusses her experience as a journalist and the power held by those who control the infrastructure of data. She introduces Michael Curry, who uncovered corruption in the mortgage industry and later discovered the Ericsson report. The report reveals how NuStar and Ericsson control the portability centers that handle data and phone calls, including financial transactions, for numerous countries. The report also highlights the connection between NuStar and the CIA.

Stanford researcher Renee DiResta and journalist Matt Taibbi discuss the revelation that Congress has access to people's emails through subpoena power. They also confirm that the Election Infrastructure Partnership (EIP) was a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) operation from the beginning, as previously established. Twitter's Lisa Roman reveals that CISA received grants to build a web portal for reporting election-related misinformation. The committee report highlights gaps in legal authorities and coordination for addressing election misinformation. DiResta explains how DHS has taken on a role similar to a domestic CIA for information control. The federal government lacked preparedness and coordination in identifying and analyzing election misinformation, as the intelligence community and FBI have specific limitations.

The speaker accuses the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of not distinguishing between domestic and foreign speech and causing harm. They mention record levels of illegal immigration, declining deportations, and fentanyl deaths. The speaker also criticizes the creation of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) for colluding with social media companies to censor free speech. They refer to a court opinion that describes this as an attack on free speech. The DHS representative denies these allegations and claims that CISA does not censor speech. The speaker questions their knowledge of the court opinion and challenges them on who determines what is false or inaccurate information. The representative defends CISA's role in identifying tactics used by foreign actors to weaponize disinformation. The speaker argues that determining what is false or true should not be left to the government.

The speaker calls the Homeland Security Investigations tip line to report a potential terrorist. However, they are frustrated by the lack of information required to make a report. The speaker only has a first name and a video of the person's face, but Homeland Security requires more detailed information such as a last name, date of birth, and address. The speaker expresses disbelief and frustration with the process, highlighting the difficulties in reporting suspicious activity to Homeland Security.