TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker discusses the release of unredacted RKI protocols by Multipolar Magazine, which reveals that the lockdown measures were not based on scientific evidence but on political instructions. The speaker criticizes the mainstream media for their lack of interest in this issue and accuses them of being complicit in promoting government measures without questioning their effectiveness. The speaker also highlights the negative consequences of the lockdowns, such as increased child mortality and the neglect of other healthcare needs. The video concludes with a call for accountability and legal action against those responsible. The transcript is in German.

Speaker 0 accuses 'you and the other leaders of your death cult, particularly as it relates to COVID case rates tied to severity of lockdowns,' and says there has not yet been 'a corresponding something remotely resembling a mea culpa' or accountability. Speaker 1 notes that 'people's lives are still affected,' including 'Kids whose schooling has been delayed for years, that may be permanent, where they're having long term effects, psychological harm, depression, drug abuse,' and adds that 'Sweden... did better than we did by far. They had actually almost no excess mortality through the entire pandemic. It's incredible. The best in Europe. And they didn't do the lockdowns.' He urges planning for the next time that is 'more human' and maintaining 'lots and lots of tools' to understand and counter new viruses, while warning that 'What we don't have is a social structure that responds to that information in a rational way' and that societies are 'prone to panic' and may 'sacrifice children, the poor, the working class,' so pandemic plans must be structured to not ever do that again.

Excess deaths of about 1,000 per week have been observed during the pandemic, even after adjusting for an aging and growing population. The rate of death in Britain is expected to increase due to an aging population, but the excess deaths are also affecting younger age groups. These unusual and alarming figures were initially attributed to people not receiving statins, but the effect of lockdown measures and misdiagnosis also played a role. Interestingly, the excess deaths started around the same time as the vaccine program, but this correlation has not been thoroughly investigated. The speaker expresses skepticism about the vaccines, stating that adverse effects are more common than claimed and that the vaccines are targeting a virus that has already evolved. The speaker's skepticism has made them a pariah in academic and medical circles.

The speaker claims adverse events from the vaccine rollout were covered up and dismissed as rare and coincidental. They state that regulators approved the vaccines based on relative risk data (95%), which they describe as misleading, while the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%, meaning 120 people had to be vaccinated to prevent one infection. The speaker alleges that Pfizer has 31 convictions, including withholding data, presenting false data, and bribing clinicians and regulators. They claim over 100 doctors have written to various health organizations, including the NHS and MHRA, about the vaccine program, but received only one response. The speaker concludes that science is dead because discussion, analysis, and debate are no longer allowed, and decisions are being made without scientific basis.

The speaker suggests that the COVID-19 vaccine may be causing more harm than good. They claim to have conducted a study of over 300 autopsies, finding that 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. They also state that 100% of cardiac arrest and sudden deaths had no other explanation but the vaccine. The speaker emphasizes the importance of these findings, as death is usually attributed to known causes.

The speakers claim many vaccinated people are dying young, but the mainstream media isn't covering it, possibly due to pharmaceutical advertising revenue. They believe that if the issue wasn't related to the politicized topic of COVID-19 vaccines, there would be more scrutiny. One speaker notes that while it's hard to link individual deaths to the vaccine, the rate of such deaths has radically changed, but people are uninterested in investigating. They suggest that scientific tools are available to detect patterns, but are being deliberately avoided. One speaker wonders if future generations will view the current situation differently, similar to how the "Red Scare" is now viewed negatively. The other speaker worries that the ability to have a proper historical account of the present will be denied, preventing understanding and correction of course. They state that without a record of what happened, improvement is impossible, which is dangerous.

Treating people like adults and providing qualified information could have potentially prevented lockdowns. However, disagreeing with this perspective, the speaker argues that not knowing the outcome doesn't change the necessity of lockdowns. Lockdowns were implemented when the hospital system in New York was overwhelmed, aiming to halt the spread of the virus. While lockdowns have gained a negative reputation, they were considered a last resort and were never intended to be permanent.

The speaker believes that the combination of a respiratory illness and fear induced by the media led to unnecessary deaths in Italy, the US, and the UK. They claim that patients were put on inappropriate doses of sedatives and antiviral drugs, leading to fatalities. The speaker, with a background in respiratory illnesses, concludes that the excessive deaths in care homes were a result of deliberate actions by the state.

In this video, the speaker presents data on COVID-19 deaths in Canada. They point out that the official number of deaths reported by the government is 52,000, which is used to create fear. However, the speaker reveals that the actual number of deaths is 36,000, as provinces and territories have been adjusting their data to exclude deaths with COVID rather than from COVID. The speaker suggests that this is an attempt to cover up the true impact of the disease.

The speaker discusses the impact of COVID-19 on society, particularly in Scotland and the UK. They highlight the high number of infant and youth deaths in Scotland, as well as the overall increase in deaths under the age of 45. The speaker criticizes the government's handling of the pandemic, including the lack of attention given to care homes and the push for vaccinations. They also mention the misuse of masks in care homes and the manipulation of COVID-19 death data. The speaker calls for accountability and action from government officials, healthcare professionals, and law enforcement.

The speaker wants the subjects to admit and stop committing fraud, and to correct old records. The speaker claims to have found over 100 accidental deaths, including blunt force trauma and acute fentanyl overdoses, that were falsely classified as COVID deaths after the bodies were tested for COVID. The speaker alleges that COVID death numbers were inflated to instill fear.

The speaker reflects on the difficulty of understanding COVID-19 due to being misled by trusted authorities, leading to public avoidance of the topic. Stories about COVID-19 don't perform well, not because of a lack of strong feelings, but because it's "triggering." People are angry that nothing changed, children were "screwed over," and some feel unhealthier after vaccination, with worries about their children. The speaker admits to not getting everything right about COVID-19, giving themselves a "B plus," citing the challenge of widespread deception from previously trusted entities.

The speaker criticizes prolonged lockdowns, stating that they have disastrous consequences for healthcare, working families, and lower-income individuals. They highlight the negative impact of missed cancer diagnoses, chemotherapy and immunization appointments, and the closure of schools leading to unreported cases of child abuse. They also mention a report stating that 1 in 4 young college-age Americans contemplated suicide in June. The speaker expresses frustration with public health experts, calling them failures for not considering the broader impact of lockdown policies and accuses them of causing harm.

The speaker questions the true cause of the high death toll during the pandemic, suggesting it may not have been due to a deadly disease but rather the measures put in place. They ponder if COVID-19 was just a rebranding of existing illnesses to instill fear and control. The speaker raises concerns about loss of freedom, censorship, and demonization of non-compliant individuals.

The speaker discusses the disappearance of the flu during the COVID-19 pandemic and questions why it was not reported in statistics. They explore various explanations, including the idea that COVID-19 was more contagious and therefore outcompeted the flu. They also mention a study from Harvard suggesting that social distancing and mask-wearing measures effectively eradicated the flu. The speaker raises concerns about the inconsistency in the effectiveness of these measures against COVID-19. They also mention financial incentives for hospitals to diagnose COVID-19 cases, which may have led to misdiagnosis or overreporting. The speaker concludes that corruption and control may be behind these inconsistencies.

The speaker believes the population was primed to fear a barely studied vaccine, leading to a reckless drug rollout that would create another wave. They claim the vaccine has likely killed more people than the virus itself. Referencing "John's work," the speaker alleges the vaccine has caused at least 550,000 deaths in the United States. They suggest that reported COVID-19 deaths are inflated due to comorbidities and iatrogenic deaths, estimating the true virus death toll to be a tenth of what is claimed and far less than vaccine deaths.

Speaker 0 expresses clear personal hesitation about vaccines, stating that they are not jabbed and would not touch the experimental mRNA and gene therapy experiments, asserting there is a lot of concern about these technologies from many medical people. They reference political figures and media narratives, saying Kennedy in the United States will expose much of this material and that Donald Trump is keen to see it as well. Speaker 0 then recalls personal health concerns related to vaccination, mentioning friends who have experienced myocarditis, blood clots, strokes, and other problems after receiving the COVID jab, and emphasizes the idea of long-term effects being unknown. Speaker 1 counters by saying they still believe in vaccinations, but notes that no one on that side would discuss possible problems with vaccines, and they themselves got vaccinated multiple times and are now open to the idea that there might have been problems. They acknowledge the complexity of the issue and state they do not object to vaccines inherently. Speaker 0 clarifies their stance further, stating they are not a medical expert but their instinct was not to have the vaccine, and they acknowledge how difficult it was to avoid it since the state appeared to force people to receive it. Speaker 1 adds that their own vaccination status includes having been vaxxed several times, and they feel okay today, though they recognize the complexity of the situation and that long-term effects are uncertain. Speaker 0 then discusses the notion that the state and public health authorities pressured people to vaccinate, naming the NHS, Matt Hancock, and portraying the messaging as a duty to vaccinate “because you might kill granny,” mentioning Trudeau and the World Economic Forum Brigade as part of the broader narrative. Speaker 0 proposes an alternative approach: those who are vulnerable should isolate themselves. They reference Anders Tegnell’s approach in Sweden, which did not impose lockdowns. They claim Sweden’s economy hardly missed a heartbeat, in contrast to “ours,” and argue that the pandemic greatly disrupted young people’s lives and education, with knock-on effects described as huge. Speaker 0 concludes that those who made the lockdown decisions are not ready to admit they got it wrong, for a host of reasons.

People are finally waking up to the evidence against vaccines, with new proof emerging regularly. MPs are reluctant to acknowledge the dangers due to political pressure and upcoming elections. The speaker was ousted from the Conservative party for criticizing the vaccine rollout, comparing it to a crime against humanity. They estimate that 10-20 million people worldwide have died from experimental vaccines, a number they fear will surpass the Holocaust.

The speakers claim the push for a COVID vaccine was motivated by money, and they believe there's a connection between the vaccine and subsequent deaths and blood clots. They express frustration that people aren't acknowledging this connection. One speaker shares a story about a veteran who was allegedly told that the hospital treating him was not allowed to connect his adverse side effects to the vaccine, even when listed as side effects. They say corporations don't want to talk about it because they mandated the vaccine. They believe people who got vaccinated don't want to admit they made a bad decision, leading them to deny any link between the vaccine and increased mortality rates, strokes, cancer, and heart attacks. One speaker recalls being gaslit by a former prime minister who denied coercing anyone into getting vaccinated, despite restrictions placed on the unvaccinated. Another speaker says they were misrepresented on CNN during their own recovery from COVID.

Worldwide, the death toll from the COVID vaccine is estimated to be over 13 million, possibly even 17 million. The speaker agrees with this estimate. They praise an interview with Brett Weinstein and agree with his points. The conversation then shifts to questioning how governments can ignore the deaths of over 10 million people and not take responsibility or make amends. This raises philosophical questions about accountability and morality.

The speaker asserts that the intentional nature of the situation is clear, supported by a wealth of data on scientific fraud, regulatory fraud, PCR test fraud, adverse events, deaths, and excess mortality correlating with vaccination rates. The regulators, who are experienced and trained, are accused of lying and denying the evidence. While some argue it is for financial gain, the speaker argues against this, pointing out that liability has been removed and shipping placebos would have been more profitable. Instead, the speaker concludes that the intention is to harm and kill people.

The speaker expresses concern over the lack of alarm raised by authorities regarding the data presented. They believe there is a cover-up happening. They mention that some individuals involved in lockdowns and policies are backtracking on their actions. The speaker estimates that there have been 300,000 excess deaths, 1,360,000 disabilities, and 26,600,000 injuries due to the vaccine. They also calculate economic costs, including $5.2 billion in damages from deaths, $52 billion from disabilities, and $89 billion from lost wages and productivity. The total estimated cost is close to $150 billion. The speaker acknowledges that the impact on productivity cannot be measured accurately but suggests it could be significantly higher than the given numbers.

The speaker expresses concern about the decision to lift isolation restrictions too early. They believe that isolation is important for preventing the spread of infection, especially since there are still over 200 COVID-related deaths per day. The speaker also mentions an article they were involved in, where they emphasized the importance of human social interaction. However, they argue that the timing of the decision seems to be a distraction from other issues, such as the prime minister breaking lockdown rules. They believe that the scientific evidence does not support completely releasing isolation for someone who is actively infectious. They suspect that the decision is being made to divert attention from the lockdown parties and police investigation at Downing Street.

The speaker questions the validity of claims that millions of lives have been saved by the COVID vaccine, stating that the evidence is weak and based on modeling studies. They argue that the vaccine has serious adverse effects, such as heart problems, and that the reported side effects are likely underreported. They criticize the lack of transparency and suppression of information by institutions and call for rebuilding the system. The speaker believes that the truth about vaccine harms will eventually come out and that getting COVID is not worse for the heart than vaccine side effects, contrary to some claims.

The speaker criticizes the media for not addressing a significant increase in all cause mortality in the country. They mention a 40% rise in mortality rates for various conditions like heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The speaker questions why the media hasn't investigated this issue thoroughly and suggests that they are influenced by external forces.