TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Je demande aux Français de soutenir l'expulsion des étrangers qui collaborent avec des idéologies dangereuses. Les lois existantes seront appliquées sans faiblesse pour protéger la France. Les mosquées radicales seront fermées, les prêcheurs de haine expulsés, et les droits des femmes seront protégés. La sécurité ne compromettra pas la liberté des citoyens honnêtes.

I'm frustrated with this administration's handling of our southern border. To the millions of illegal aliens released in violation of federal law, it's time to start packing. The reason we have 50,000 people in detention is due to the failure to secure the border. The federal government has let down the American people by not closing loopholes. Last year, there were 137,000 criminals, including 2,000 murders and 12,000 sex offenses. We need to increase the number of agents in New York City to address this issue. My goal throughout my service has been to save lives, and there are ways to carry out deportations without separating families. Families can be deported together.

The speaker discusses a position held by some in the immigrants' rights community who advocate granting legal status to those who are in the country illegally, or at minimum pausing deportations until better laws are enacted. This view is often framed in moral terms, emphasizing compassion and the idea that people should not be punished simply for trying to earn a living. The speaker acknowledges the sincere humanitarian impulse behind this argument but asserts that such an indiscriminate approach would be unwise and unfair. First, the speaker argues that granting legal status or suspending enforcement without regard to existing laws would send a problematic signal. It would suggest to people who are considering coming to the country illegally that there will be no consequences for that decision. The speaker warns that this could lead to a surge in illegal immigration as fewer barriers or penalties are perceived to exist, encouraging more individuals to attempt entry or stay despite being in violation of the law. Second, the speaker emphasizes the existence of a global queue or waiting process for legal entry. By offering widespread legal status or de facto amnesty, the policy would overlook or sideline the millions of people around the world who are currently waiting their turn to come to the country through legal channels. This aspect highlights a sense of fairness and order in immigration policy, underscoring that legal pathways and timelines are in place for a reason and should be respected. Third, the speaker reiterates a fundamental principle about national sovereignty and governance. The United States, like all nations, has the right and obligation to control its borders and to establish laws governing residency and citizenship. This point frames immigration policy as a matter of sovereign rights and societal rules that nations set to maintain order, security, and the integrity of their legal framework. In sum, the speaker presents a cautious stance against broad, indiscriminate legalization or halting deportations, arguing that such measures would be unwise and unfair, could encourage more illegal immigration, would disregard the legal processes that many people are patiently awaiting, and would conflict with the nation’s right and obligation to regulate entry and residency.

The speaker presents a hypothetical scenario of an illegal gang member arriving at the U.S. Southwest border during the Biden-Harris era in 2023. He traveled with assistance from taxpayer-funded NGOs and, after being encountered, was released into the interior with a notice to appear in immigration court and a work permit. The individual files a bare-bones asylum application that is described as frivolous. Because the immigration court backlog is nearly 4,000,000 cases, the case would take years to adjudicate. In the meantime, the person would relocate to a major city, receive taxpayer-funded benefits, potentially commit crimes, be protected by sanctuary city leadership, and be defended by Democrats who allegedly say immigration laws are too harsh. The asylum claim would be denied by an immigration judge years later, followed by appeals to the Board of Immigration Appeals, then to a federal court of appeals, all taking months or years and expending extensive federal resources. The speaker claims this illustrates a broader pattern in what he calls “open borders” policies and a system that wastes federal resources on frivolous claims. The speaker introduces the bill: the Expedited Removal of Criminal Aliens Act. It aims to prevent criminal aliens from exploiting the asylum system and to ensure quicker deportation. It states that foreign nationals convicted of certain crimes are ineligible for immigration relief, must be detained, and deported quickly. The speaker notes that decades of immigration law already authorize a more efficient process to remove certain dangerous criminal aliens through administrative or expedited removal, particularly for aggravated felons, with due process upheld in federal appellate courts. The bill would expand categories of criminal aliens who may be placed in removal proceedings when in criminal custody and authorize the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to place additional criminals in expedited removal proceedings. It would allow DHS to fast-track deportation for aliens who are not lawful permanent residents and who are part of a criminal gang, transnational criminal organization, or foreign terrorist organization, or who have been convicted of dangerous crimes. The speaker then lists the specific crimes that would trigger eligibility under the bill: any felony; any misdemeanor against a member of a vulnerable group; assault on a law enforcement officer; sexual offenses; domestic violence; stalking; crimes against children; sex trafficking of a minor or sexual abuse of a minor; activities involving exploitation of minors or violations of protective orders. The “vulnerable group” includes children under 16, pregnant women, individuals with severe physical or mental disabilities, and seniors over 65. The speaker cites polling: 78% of Americans support deporting immigrants who are here illegally and have committed crimes, including nearly 70% of Democrats; 56% support deporting all illegal immigrants, with 36% of Democrats agreeing. He contrasts these views with what he claims were Democratic actions during the previous administration: high border encounters, 8,000,000 illegal entries (including 2,000,000 gotaways), hundreds on the terrorist watch list encountered and released, and a record immigration court backlog. He accuses Democrats of inaction on border security and comprehensive immigration reform, citing several bills the House allegedly passed or votes by Democrats against, including bills on border security, identity theft, driving-while-illegal offenses, and increasing penalties for felons, as well as naming acts after victims of crimes committed by illegal aliens. He concludes by arguing that the American people rejected the Democratic approach and gave Congress a mandate to secure the border and reform the immigration system, and asserts that the expedited removal bill moves toward that goal.

There are situations where far-right groups try to prevent access to institutions and courts during the asylum process. This goes against the principles of the Republic and deserves appropriate punishment. I propose that we move forward on this issue and create a new offense of obstructing the right to asylum. This would be a significant step and not just symbolic. It would complement the existing legal tools that are already powerful but do not specifically condemn obstruction of this important legal process. I suggest withdrawing your amendments so that we can work on this new legal concept, which is crucial in my opinion.

This proposal is a serious matter. People who register and vote illegally disenfranchise actual US citizens. The speaker objects to the suggestion that their motive is to disingenuously sow fear and uncertainty about election legitimacy, calling the accusation inaccurate and lacking proof. The speaker believes there is ample reason to bring the proposal forward and expresses deep disappointment that it cannot pass. It is not too much to ask to put teeth into existing laws stating that only US citizens can vote in US elections. The House passed it, and the Senate could pass it now. It is inexcusable not to.

The speaker describes a scenario of a trendy illegal immigrant arriving at the U.S. Southwest border during the 2023 crisis, aided by taxpayer-funded NGOs, and released into the interior with a notice to appear in immigration court. He asserts the person will file a bare-bones, frivolous asylum application, aided by another NGO, and that due to a nearly 4,000,000-case immigration court backlog, the case will take years to be heard. In the meantime, the individual is said to move to a major city, receive taxpayer-funded benefits, commit crimes, be supported by sanctuary-city leadership, and be defended by Democrats who oppose strict immigration laws. The process allegedly drags on with continuances and motions, and years later an immigration judge supposedly denies the asylum claim. The individual is said to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which allegedly takes months or years, followed by appellate denial in a federal court of appeals. The speaker charges that federal departments and courts expend many taxpayer dollars on such cases, all to deport an apparently frivolous claimant. The focal policy proposal is the expedited removal of criminal aliens act, described as straightforward: criminal aliens cannot misuse the asylum system and must be detained and deported quickly if they are in the U.S. with certain criminal convictions. The speaker notes that current law already permits expedited removal for aggravated felon aliens, who are considered ineligible for asylum and relief and are presumed deportable; this is said to be constitutionally upheld by every federal court of appeals that has addressed it. The bill would expand categories of criminal aliens who may face removal proceedings when in criminal custody and authorize the Department of Homeland Security to place additional criminals in expedited removal. It would allow fast-track deportation for non-lawful permanent residents who are in a gang, transnational criminal organization, or foreign terrorist organization, or who have been convicted of dangerous crimes. The bill’s specified conviction categories include: any felony; any misdemeanor against a member of a vulnerable group; any assault on a law enforcement officer; any sexual offense; any crime of domestic violence; any stalking; any crime against children; sex trafficking or sexual exploitation of minors; sexual abuse of a minor; any activity involving child sexual exploitation; or any violation of a protective order. The term “vulnerable group” covers a child under 16, a pregnant woman, a person with severe disability, and seniors over 65. The speaker cites a poll claiming 78% of Americans support deporting illegal immigrants who have committed crimes, including nearly 70% of Democrats, and asserts broad public support for tougher immigration action while criticizing Democrats’ handling of border policy. He accuses Democrats of previously expanding border openings, cites alleged prior high border encounters, millions of entrants, and 2,000,000 “gotaways,” along with terrorists allegedly released and a record immigration court backlog, blaming the Democrats for a perceived border crisis. He argues recent House actions and votes against border-security measures and declares the bill a step toward securing the border and reforming immigration policy, urging support. He concludes by urging colleagues to back the expedited removal of criminal aliens act.

It is wildly inappropriate to have any foreign-born individuals in Congress or the judiciary system, regardless of their politics. Foreign-born individuals should be banned from holding positions of power in the country, including Congress and the courts. America's institutions should be controlled by Americans whose identity, loyalty, and instincts are shaped in this country, not imported from somewhere else. Allowing foreigners to make decisions about our laws and leaders is national suicide and an open invitation to sabotage, infiltrate, and deliberately erode American sovereignty. It is like an American woman moving to India, becoming a citizen, and then trying to impeach their president and rewrite their constitution. Foreign-born individuals are controlling what happens in the country.

Immigrants commit crimes at a lower rate than natural-born citizens. Statistically, a town or neighborhood is safer with immigrants because they commit violent crimes less often than people born in the United States. The speaker objects to the bill, stating it feeds a false narrative that the country should fear families coming to the United States fleeing economic desperation, violence, terror, or torture in search of a better life.

Judge Brian Murphy blocked the Trump administration's deportation of eight illegal immigrants convicted of murder, pedophilia, and sexual abuse, arguing they deserve due process. The immigrants are currently in Djibouti awaiting adjudication. One speaker argues that these individuals did not want due process when entering the country illegally, so they shouldn't get it upon deportation. They should be deported immediately, especially murderers, pedophiles, and rapists, which is what Donald Trump is doing. The speaker believes Judge Murphy cannot override Trump's agenda to keep America safe. Trump should deport these criminals quickly to protect women and children. Some countries release violent criminals into the U.S., which is a national security problem. The U.S. has the right to stand up for its freedoms, liberty, and national security.

Speaker critiques the New Way Forward Act, a House bill sponsored by 44 Democrats including Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; at about 4,400 words, “almost exactly as long as The US constitution.” It would “entirely remake our immigration system with the explicit purpose of ensuring that criminals are able to move to The United States and settle here permanently with immunity.” The promoting document states: “Convictions should not lead to deportation.” The bill aims to “break the, quote, prison to deportation pipeline,” eliminating “crimes of moral turpitude” and the category of aggravated felony as deportation triggers. Under the bill, there would no longer be any crime that automatically requires deportation, and “falsifying a passport would be made immune from deportation no matter what.” It also “decriminalizes illegal entry” and calls criminalizing illegal entry “white supremacist.” It creates a pathway for those previously deported to return—“the right to come home”—with DHS paying for flights; tickets could cost about a billion dollars, and “free health care” for those criminals. The speaker claims it would invert every assumption.

To pass my amendment, the Senate must remove Democrat leaders blocking it. I propose a vote on whether American taxpayer money should be used to fly illegal immigrants from Venezuela and Haiti into the US. President Biden has secretly flown 320,000 illegal aliens into Blue City airports in 2023. Vote against me to stop this practice. Time has expired.

HR 7909 will be voted on in the House tonight. The bill would immediately deport illegals who harm women and kids. Every member of Congress should vote to protect women and kids tonight. We need to stop illegals from hunting our women.

We need to establish strict conditions for immigration. Those who have committed crimes should be deported without exception. For law-abiding individuals, we should outline specific requirements for them to stay. These include paying a significant fine for their illegal entry, settling any back taxes owed, making an effort to learn English, and waiting their turn in the immigration process.

Politicians need to stop using immigration as a political tool and address it as a serious challenge. I will collaborate with both parties to enact the border security bill that was previously halted. As attorney general of a border state, I witnessed the chaos caused by transnational criminal organizations. As president, we will swiftly remove those who enter unlawfully, prosecute the cartels, and provide essential support to border patrol.

Every U.S. resident, including those here illegally, should have access to healthcare, according to the bill. I am against denying anyone public safety, education, or health services in our country.

Immigration is an issue with working-class voters because of the lack of progress we've made. Republicans weaponize this lack of progress. Last year, there was a bipartisan bill that the Republican majority in the Senate and the House were willing to pass, and President Biden was willing to work with them on it, but Donald Trump told them not to solve the problem. Republicans do not want to solve any issues with immigration. They are completely uninterested in addressing undocumented people or a path to citizenship. Republicans authorized the complete gutting of due process. They understand that they don't even have the infrastructure to deport people, so they are creating private prison camp pipelines.

The speaker claims there are millions of people in the country who need to be here, including criminals. The speaker states that there are probably 20,000,000 people in the country.

It's common sense that we have many migrants here illegally who have committed crimes. It's hard to understand why anyone would defend allowing them to stay in the country. If you're here illegally and committing crimes, it's not controversial to say they should go. This issue was significant in the election. In the Senate, there are 47 members, and if we can't secure at least 7 votes, that's part of the reason for our loss. It's crucial to recognize the importance of addressing this issue effectively.

Just passed HR 30, a bill to deport illegal aliens who are rapists, murderers, and child molesters, ensuring they can never return to the U.S. It's alarming that 145 Democrats opposed this measure aimed at protecting women and girls. The argument that the bill broadens the definition of domestic violence too much is unacceptable. As a survivor of domestic violence, I believe we cannot broaden the definition enough to protect victims. Thank you to everyone who supported this bill; it now moves to the Senate.

All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected, but in every place in this country are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by borrowing welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former congresswoman Barbara Jordan. We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws.

A bill called the New Way Forward Act is currently pending in Congress, sponsored by 44 House Democrats. This legislation aims to overhaul the U.S. immigration system, making it easier for criminals to settle in the country without the risk of deportation. It eliminates grounds for deportation related to felony convictions and moral turpitude, allowing serious offenders to remain in the U.S. Additionally, it decriminalizes illegal entry and restricts ICE's ability to detain illegal immigrants. The bill even proposes using taxpayer money to facilitate the return of deported criminals. Despite its significant implications, the media has largely ignored this legislation, raising concerns about the lack of public awareness regarding its potential impact on American law and society.

I understand both sides of the migration debate, from those who have suffered and deserve protection, to those who may not be genuine asylum seekers. Immigration has happened quickly, causing challenges in areas like education and criminal justice. However, it is important not to blame immigrants but rather the government's lack of proper policies and organization. I support the bill as it addresses issues like illegal trafficking, the need for a single procedure, and stronger deportation powers. Creating a list of safe countries can also help distinguish valid claims from less likely ones.

Just passed HR 30, my bill to deport illegal aliens who are rapists, murderers, and child molesters. Once deported, they should never return. It’s disappointing that 145 Democrats opposed this measure aimed at protecting women and girls. Some argued that the bill overly broadened the definition of domestic violence, claiming it could harm victims. As a survivor of domestic violence, I believe we need to expand the definition to better protect victims. Thank you to everyone who supported this bill; it now moves to the Senate.

It's common sense that we have many migrants here illegally who have committed crimes. It's hard to understand why anyone would defend allowing them to stay in the country. If someone is here illegally and engages in criminal activity, they should be removed. This issue was significant in the recent election. In the Senate, with 47 members, if we can't secure at least 7 votes on this matter, it reflects why we lost. This is one of the reasons for our defeat. Brett, consider that perspective; it's a crucial point being made.