TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker states they are buying churches and converting them into masjids, having already converted three. They are now buying a church with a school to serve the community, with the belief that the people will one day be Muslims. The plan is to turn the church into a masjid and the school into an Islamic school. The speaker claims that 100 years ago, others invaded the Muslim world, building missionary schools and destroying Islamic schools and masjids. Now, they are returning the favor by converting churches into masjids and schools into Islamic schools to bring the light of Islam. They are buying ready-to-go institutions that have emptied out and are ready to be filled with Muslims. The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with the current election candidates and hopes for Islam to achieve victory in the country.

The speaker states they have bought three churches and converted them to masjids. They are now buying a church with a school to convert into a masjid and Islamic school. The speaker believes that the people who were part of the church community will one day be Muslims. They state that 100 years ago, others invaded the Muslim world, building missionary schools and destroying Islamic schools and masjids. The speaker says they are returning the favor by turning churches into masjids and schools into Islamic schools to bring the light of Islam.

Discussion centers on Ashraf Motiwala’s GEM Summit, described as conceived in America in Texas and driven by American exceptionalism shaping Muslim communities. In Dallas, Muslims are middle-class migrants seeking to preserve their children's identity; they are urged to visit Dallas Muslim communities. The speakers urge Muslims to engage with a MAGA right, noting MAGA is evolving: white chauvinist and anti migration but with a growing anti-Islamophobe anti-Zionist current and a shift. James Bell says: not find a single person in his peer group under 40 who supports Israel. Dawah strategy: drive this, have conversations, visit them, go to town halls, church spaces, bazaars, and engage with them as Muslims. They describe MAGA as three strands and argue for a middle-ground appeal, prioritizing public opinion and resource allocation over elections. They push soft power via civil society, cross-border collaboration, and connecting Muslim education and tech networks.

America is the cancer. America, the American government, secularism, democracy, capitalism, these are cancers that have spread their illness all over the world, In America and in The Middle East. Non Muslims are tired of this cancer. They're tired of the American government. They want to see a new way of life. And as Muslims, we have to understand that we have that new way of life. Rasulullah was sent as a mercy for all of mankind. Why? Because the way of life he brought will bring that mercy. The way of life he brought will bring that tranquility to Muslims and non Muslims. They don't have to because Islam is a just religion that has come to be implemented upon

In this video, the speakers emphasize the power of American Muslims in making a difference in 2016. They encourage Muslims to be at the forefront and not retreat, as their votes hold negotiating power. They also express solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement, stating that it is their campaign too. Speaker 1 compares the struggles of Muslims to those of black people in America, warning that without standing up, Muslims may face violence. They believe that if they can stage revolutions across the world, they can also bring about change in America.

An individual asserts the need to stand for election and take charge of the country, warning that seculars and liberals will otherwise take over. A religious figure issued a fatwa, stating that while democracy was once considered haram, participation in democracy is now a form of jihad. This new form of jihad involves fighting through ballots rather than bullets, with the goal of winning elections. A member of the ummah is told that their duty as an American is to engage in physical jihad to fight until the entire earth enters into the ummah.

The speaker states the goal is not to melt into American society but to enter it with Islamic ideals and revamp American thinking, turning people into Muslims. Muslims should not feel distaste or intolerance towards Americans because they are potential Muslims. Education is a key area for Muslims to address. The ultimate objective is to create Islamic systems, not only for Muslims, but to view all people in the country as potential Muslims. The long-range process aims to make all of America Muslim.

The presentation outlines how a mosque-affiliated organization can engage with politics through a hierarchy of entities while staying within legal constraints, and it encourages active civic participation and strategic funding to protect the community. Key points: - 501(c)(3) mosque organization: May not engage in partisan political work or lobbying, but can encourage civically engaged behavior such as registering to vote and going to the polls. The benefit of a C3 is tax-exempt status and tax-deductible donations. - 501(c)(4) social welfare/lobbying organization: Outside the masjid, a C4 can lobby, fight legislation, propose legislation, and mobilize people across all levels of government (school boards, city councils, state legislatures, federal). Donations to a C4 are not tax-deductible, but the organization can influence policy and legislation. - PACs (Political Action Committees): These collect money and give to candidates, with contribution limits (e.g., up to $5,000 to a candidate). They can raise funds for candidates but have ceiling restrictions. - Super PACs (independent expenditure committees): Created following a Supreme Court decision about eleven years ago, Super PACs are the most influential in campaigns. They can raise unlimited funds and spend on TV ads, mailers, and digital ads in support of a candidate as long as they do not coordinate with the candidate’s campaign. Additional information about CARE and its structures: - CARE (the C3 organization defending Muslim rights for 30 years) has 70 attorneys and remains available to assist anyone facing discrimination or intimidation due to being Muslim, including outreach through its DFW office. - CARE created CARE Action, a C4 lobbying organization to elevate the political influence of the Muslim community, particularly after the Gaza genocide; there is a chapter in the DFW area with active leadership and contacts. - CARE also established a Muslim super PAC, Unity and Justice Fund. The speaker notes that vocal restrictions limit further discussion but encourages engagement with Muslim organizations for involvement. - The speaker emphasizes that business-as-usual has not prevented genocides and that different, more effective forms of engagement are needed, including redirecting resources to better protect the future of the ummah in America. - The relationship between the Muslim community in the United States and the Muslim world is not ideal, and Muslims in the U.S. bear responsibility because they live in America and participate in its political framework. Participation through voting and organized civic action is framed as essential, since public leadership is tied to electoral outcomes. - The speaker invites further connection with CARE and KAIR staff for questions and opportunities, noting limitations due to C3 status and promising to seek solutions from now until November and beyond. The overall message: The community should move beyond limited engagement and leverage the C3, C4, PACs, and Super PACs framework to protect rights, influence policy, and ensure active participation in the political process, with CARE and Unity and Justice Fund serving as concrete pathways for involvement.

Peace to you all. I’m Saba Ahmed, a law student. With 1.8 billion Muslims globally and over 8 million in America, I question how we can win an ideological war through military means alone. The jihadist ideology needs to be addressed ideologically. While many Muslims are peaceful, radicals, estimated at 15-25%, pose a significant threat. History shows that peaceful majorities often become irrelevant in the face of radical agendas. For instance, 19 radicals caused immense destruction on 9/11. As an American Muslim, I believe I am not irrelevant. I mourn the lives lost in Libya and advocate for justice. However, military action alone won't resolve this issue; we need to engage Muslims in dialogue to find solutions.

In this discussion, the central thread is that Christian communities across the Middle East have borne the brunt of foreign and domestic policies, particularly under U.S. and Israeli actions, while Christian voices in the West have often been quiet or polarized by political loyalties. Key points raised by Speaker 0 include: - A long-standing pattern in American foreign policy where Christians suffer disproportionately in wars the U.S. funds or supports, with Iraq’s ancient Christian community devastated (nine out of ten Christians fled or were killed as a result of the occupation). Similar silences surrounded Christian killings in Syria and, more recently, the treatment of Christians in Ukraine, Gaza, the West Bank, and Israel. - In Ukraine, the U.S. government sent more than $100 billion; in Gaza and the broader Middle East, Christian communities have faced severe hardship. A Greek Orthodox church in Gaza was hit by an airstrike in October, with at least 17 dead that day. The broader pattern includes earlier violence such as the destruction around the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem and the lack of vocal Christian clergy in the U.S. who spoke up at the time. - The use of humanitarian aid or policy toward the Middle East is perceived as biased by many Christian communities in the region, who feel their own suffering is being ignored if it does not align with American political aims or with Evangelical support for Israel. Reverend Munther Ishak, pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Bethlehem, provides on-the-ground perspective: - The Christian communities in the West Bank, Gaza, and Israel proper are facing unprecedented fragmentation and decline. In Gaza, eight to 100 Palestinian Christians remain in the territory, with any death impacting the community deeply. Members of Ishak’s church have family in Gaza who cannot visit due to restrictions, and Bethlehem’s Christian population is shrinking as relatives move abroad for safety and livelihoods. - Ishak describes American political dynamics as problematic: some U.S. lawmakers—reflecting the religious right or certain partisan positions—express views that directly affect Palestinians, including Christian communities. He cites examples of pastors advocating destruction of Gaza and questions whether such calls align with Christian ethics, noting the harm to Christian witnesses in the region. - He emphasizes that much of the money flowing from churches to the region funds Israeli military actions and settlement-building on land confiscated from Palestinians, including Palestinian Christians. This financial support, he argues, undermines humanitarian efforts and peace initiatives, and damages the Christian presence in the Holy Land. - The reality of life under Israeli occupation is harsh in both Gaza and the West Bank, with land seizures, travel restrictions, and a fragile, often dangerous existence for Palestinian Christians. In East Jerusalem, Christians face repeated, sometimes violent incitement; evangelism is restricted, and some churches feel a systematic effort to “empty Jerusalem of Christians.” - Ishak argues for recognizing the humanity and political rights of Palestinians, including Palestinian Christians, and for a two-state or other peace solution. He criticizes the conflation of biblical chosenness with unconditional political support for Israel, warning that such stance compromises Christian witness and undermines the possibility of peaceful coexistence. - He calls on American Christian leaders to listen to Palestinian Christian voices, to advocate for peace and justice, and to avoid simplistic, polarizing positions. He contends that war does not align with the teachings of Jesus and urges Christians to pursue nonviolent, principled paths to end the occupation and to protect Christian communities in the Holy Land. The overall message is a plea for attentive, principled engagement from American Christian leaders and policymakers: listen to Palestinian Christians, reassess unconditional support for political allies, and pursue peaceful, just solutions that protect all communities and sustain Christian witness in the region.

The speaker argues that our country was founded upon Judeo-Christian principles and values to make it a godly nation, and that we must reconnect with the spirituality of why it was created. The struggle we face is described as a battle between good and evil, with the infiltration into the country labeled the single greatest threat. This threat is intellectual, emotional, physical, and spiritual. The speaker emphasizes that the United States is a republic with a representative form of government, where “we, the people” determine how we will live. They note that the last ten presidential elections averaged 67% turnout, meaning more than 30% of registered voters did not vote. The call is to organize and cultivate a passion for the country, especially given the challenges ahead, which are described as formidable and tied to the adversaries who are “smart and evil.” A central message is that survival for the next two hundred fifty years depends on states standing up and embracing local action. The speaker urges people to take their concerns to their counties, towns, and churches, to speak up and to sound off. Each listener is urged to consider how they can serve today, because one person cannot control national events or Washington, D.C. but can influence life in their own community. To act, the speaker proposes practical ways to contribute: making phone calls, sending emails, writing letters, and going door to door. The overarching theme is service to the country here and now. The repeated exhortation is to carry this message home and to ask others the defining question: “How am I serving today?” and “How are you serving today?” The speaker acknowledges the inevitability of national leadership and personalities (e.g., Donald Trump) but asserts that individual citizens can shape their immediate surroundings by engaging in local efforts. The appeal is to dedicate time and energy to constitutional goals at the local level, to work toward objectives such as constitutional carry, and to determine how each person can contribute to their state and community. In closing, the speaker expresses a personal longing and emotional urgency, pleading with audiences to take the message back to their communities and to persist in asking others how they are serving today, in order to mobilize collective action and national resilience through local involvement.

The speaker claims the Muslim Brotherhood aims to destroy America from within using groups like CAIR, MSA, and ISNA as fronts, referencing a 1991 plan. CAIR and ISNA were allegedly unindicted co-conspirators in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, accused of funneling money to Hamas. The speaker references CAIR's 2025 plan to fund thousands of lawyers, journalists, and influencers, and elect 50 Muslim congressmen by 2040 to reshape America. The speaker contrasts loyalty to the US with supporting Palestinian causes and denouncing America. The speaker urges the US government to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and its front organizations as terrorist entities, citing bans in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Libya, Russia, Austria, Syria, Jordan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. The speaker calls for banning the Brotherhood, revoking CAIR and ISNA's tax-exempt status, and reopening the Holy Land case. The speaker urges listeners to visit actforamerica.org to support the "Stop the Stealth Jihad Now" campaign.

We should expand our efforts to receive more funding from those who can afford it. Even $10-20 million annually would make a significant impact. Engaging with different online communities is crucial. We must consider protesting, civil initiatives, and asset redistribution. This is the essence of my work, which is no small task.

The speaker discusses an upcoming trip and the actions needed to sustain progress, emphasizing that the audience should not turn away any friends and should mobilize all possible support. The central message is that the era of “Black Hawk Down” is over, and Somalia is on the upswing. Several reasons are highlighted for optimism: Somalia has a fully thinking progressive president; a parliament that is working hard to construct a system of laws for the Somali people; and, for the first time in twenty-two years, the United States government is so confident in this government in Somalia that we recognize this government. In addition, it is noted that two days after the speaker left Mogadishu, Rod Shaw, who is the head of The United States in international development, landed in Mogadishu himself, underscoring visible engagement from the U.S. At the same time, the speaker emphasizes that the bottom line is that steady progress will require the help of everyone present. There is a clear admonition that no one in the room can assume that other people will do the work, implying that personal responsibility is essential for continued progress. The speaker calls for broad participation: “We need your help.” Addressing the audience directly, the speaker says, “Yes, you. You understand what I mean? Every single individual needs to take personal responsibility for the continued progress of Somalia and the continued strengthening of the United States–Somali relationship.” This framing reinforces the expectation of individual contribution to collective advancement and the deepening of ties with the United States. Finally, the speaker articulates a hopeful vision for Somalia’s future: “My dream, God willing, is to see Somalia in the eyes of the world move from being a security threat to a security partner.” The vision includes transforming Somalia’s role on the global stage and domestic economy: moving from a recipient of emergency food aid to a commercial and trading partner. The overarching theme is the necessity of active, individual commitment to sustain political stability, legal development, and stronger U.S.–Somali relations in order to realize this favorable trajectory.

The world is divided into two groups: those who embrace Islam and those who oppose it. Islam will inevitably reach every household. Plans are in place to engage with influential figures like Donald Trump and Joe Biden, encouraging them towards Islam. We aim to connect with various individuals, including Bobby and Sneko, as part of our efforts as an Ummah. More people who recognize the current societal issues will be drawn to Islam.

Only the Khalifa can liberate Palestine; everything else is a distraction. Reflecting on the past year, no regime in the Muslim world has effectively defended Palestine. Historically, the Ummah achieved victories against enemies through unity and strong leadership. Today, we lack such heroes, and corrupt rulers hinder our armies from protecting Muslims. This is a call to action. Relying on ineffective international organizations has failed us. Instead, we must embrace Allah's solution for unifying Muslim lands, reclaiming resources, and defending our community. Imagine a future where the Ummah is united politically, ideologically, and militarily, ensuring no Muslim cry for help goes unheard. Join us on January 18th to discuss how Allah's promise can lead to the liberation of Palestine and the advancement of the Ummah. Are you ready to engage in this crucial conversation?

The speaker advocates for greater representation of British Muslims in various sectors, including the army, legal profession, and British businesses. They want to see more Muslims in leadership positions across government, not just one in the cabinet and one in the shadow cabinet. The speaker emphasizes the need for Muslims to reach the highest levels of authority in British society.

The speaker urges the audience to vote, stating that early voting starts tomorrow and continues until election day on June 24. They believe New Yorkers want consistency, principles, and a belief in humanity. The speaker notes that while there are a million Muslims in the city, with 200,000 registered as Democrats, only 7% voted in the last election. They feel there is an opportunity this year, stating they began the race at 1% and are now 2% sure of winning. They believe they have the support of people across the city. The speaker asks the audience to inform everyone they know about the election and what's on the ballot, emphasizing that Muslims deserve equality and respect. They state that these things must be won, particularly at the ballot box, to show that Muslims belong in City Hall.

Since October 7th, Americans have been shocked by the deterioration of universities. This is allegedly due to the Muslim Brotherhood using groups like CAIR, MSA, and ISNA to destroy America from within, as outlined in their 1991 project. CAIR and ISNA were named unindicted co-conspirators in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, accused of funneling millions to Hamas, but faced no consequences. At ISNA's 2025 conference, CAIR's executive director allegedly unveiled a plan to fund 4,000 mosques, 50,000 Muslim lawyers, journalists, and influencers by 2040, and elect 50 Muslim congressmen in six years to reshape America's laws and culture. The speaker stated that they have no problem with Muslims running for office if their loyalty is to the United States. The speaker advocates designating the Muslim Brotherhood and its front organizations as terrorist entities, citing bans in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Libya, Russia, Austria, Syria, Jordan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. The speaker urges action to ban the Brotherhood, revoke CAIR and ISNA's tax-exempt status, and reopen the Holy Land case.

The speaker states that Muslims do not want to assimilate into American society but instead want to introduce Islamic ideals to revamp American thinking and convert people to Islam. They believe Muslims should not feel distaste or intolerance towards Americans because they are potential Muslims. Education is considered a crucial area for Muslims to focus on. The speaker clarifies that the ultimate goal is not just to integrate into the existing system but to establish independent Islamic systems. These systems are not only for Muslims but also aimed at converting all people in the country to Islam, with the long-term objective of making all of America Muslim.

The world is divided between Islam and those who want to destroy it and society. Islam will enter every household. There's a plan to visit Donald Trump and call him toward Islam, and if Biden is awake, to visit him as well. The speaker hopes to soon see Bobby's Shahada and others like Sneako. As Muslims, they're going to be reaching out to everybody. More and more people who know that society is going in the wrong direction are going to be coming to Islam.

The speaker states that instead of force, laws are now being used, citing Canada's Islamophobia law M103. Another speaker says the only options are "ballot or bullet" and that participating in democracy is now their "jihad." Voting is now considered an obligatory action, a "jihad" to elect people who want Sharia law. It's claimed that in the last U.S. election, over 800 Muslim candidates ran for office. One speaker suggests that within six years, there could be 50 Muslims in Congress, replacing the current system with people who represent the prophet.

I have been doing strategic planning for various organizations for 20 years. I decided to use my experience to advance Islam in America by instilling Islamic values in every American for Allah's pleasure. We aim to address issues like crime and drugs by offering solutions through Islam. Our goal is to establish Islamic schools and facilities across the country, promoting education, health, and jobs in the name of Islam. We plan to integrate Sharia law with the constitution through the electoral process, aiming to have more Muslims in political positions for long-term change. Dearborn already showcases Muslim influence in the city, showing that change is possible with time.

Why are we in America? Like the Prophet's companions who left Makkah for a land without Muslims, we are here for the sake of Allah. With this intention, our perspective changes, and we should actively share Islam with those around us. As Muslims living in the U.S., we must understand our role. The Quran advises us not to obey disbelievers but instead to strive for the establishment of Islam. Our duty is to engage in jihad, which means working to spread the teachings of Allah by all necessary means. This long-term effort aims to make America a place where Islam is recognized and practiced.

Since October 7th, Americans have been shocked by the deterioration of universities. This is due to the Muslim Brotherhood using groups like CAIR, MSA, and ISNA to destroy America from within, as outlined in their 1991 project. CAIR and ISNA were named unindicted co-conspirators in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, accused of funneling millions to Hamas, but faced no consequences. At ISNA's 2025 conference, CAIR's director unveiled a plan for 4,000 mosques funding 50,000 Muslim lawyers, journalists, and influencers by 2040, plus 50 Muslim congressmen in six years, aiming to reshape America's laws and culture. The speaker stated that loyalty to the US is paramount, and condemns those who wave terrorist flags while destroying American symbols. The speaker urges the government to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and its front organizations as terrorist entities, like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and others have done. They advocate banning the Brotherhood, revoking CAIR and ISNA's tax-exempt status, and reopening the Holy Land case. The speaker concludes by urging listeners to visit actforamerica.org and support their "Stop the Stealth Jihad Now" campaign.