reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition for suggesting that everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wanting to make Canada great again. Canadians do not share this nostalgia. The speaker highlights the leader's past as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, where he violated the rights of indigenous peoples, ignored environmental responsibilities, and lacked a plan for the future.

The speaker criticizes the government for spending $66 billion on illegal immigrants compared to $3 billion on homeless veterans in 2023. They suggest reallocating funds to support veterans' mental health, caregiver programs, and homeless services. The speaker blames the Biden administration for not prioritizing American citizens over illegal immigrants. They urge for transparency in spending to redirect funds to benefit veterans.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition, stating that he believes everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wants to make Canada great again. However, the speaker argues that Canadians do not share this sentiment. They highlight the leader's past actions as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, including violating the rights of indigenous peoples and neglecting environmental responsibilities. The speaker also mentions the lack of a future environmental and economic plan.

The speaker discusses the government's spending of $8 million on searching for unmarked graves at a school in Kamloops, BC, with no results. They criticize the wasteful spending and highlight the financial struggles of Canadians. The speaker expresses frustration at consistently being proven right about issues years before they are acknowledged, leading to backlash and cancelation. They predict being vindicated in the future.

Our payments to NATO are disproportionate and ridiculous compared to others. Solving this issue is crucial because it will allow us to address important causes like homelessness, farmers, and healthcare. Unfortunately, we don't have the funds to support these priorities because our country is financially strained. If we had better business abilities, we could generate surplus profits that could be used to defend and support our homeless, poor, sick, and farmers. Instead, we are giving money to countries that don't care about us.

"That's your Canadian government right there that just did this. I went to Bosnia, Somalia, and Afghanistan, and I did not fucking serve my country for this bullshit that's fucking in front of us. Right? The government has committed their own fucking atrocity at this Canadian government. Right?"

The speaker introduces a campaign to cut government waste, stating that deficit reduction requires difficult choices, including cuts to valued programs. They claim there has been a tremendous amount of waste and fraud in the government during the Biden administration, estimating federal government fraud at half a trillion dollars. The goal is to reduce this figure, saving taxpayer money by stopping spending on things that very few taxpayers would agree makes sense. Examples cited include transgender animal surgeries and the presence of twenty million dead people in the Social Security database.

The speaker criticizes the conservatives for prioritizing symbols over action during their time in government. They highlight the closure of 9 veterans offices and the lack of investments in cancer research. In contrast, they mention their own investment in the Terry Fox foundation. The speaker also mentions the desecration of the Terry Fox statue and accuses the conservatives of disregarding women's rights in Afghanistan.

The speaker asserts that the Canadian government has committed an atrocity, stating, "That's your Canadian government right there... The government has committed their own fucking atrocity at this Canadian government." They recount having served in Bosnia, Somalia, and Afghanistan, and declare, "I did not fucking serve my country for this bullshit that's fucking in front of us." The speaker emphasizes that the government is responsible for the current situation.

In 2023, the federal government spent over $66 billion on illegal immigrants, while only $3 billion was allocated for homeless veterans. This disparity raises questions about priorities. The breakdown of spending on illegal immigrants includes $5.8 billion for SNAP, $10 billion for Medicare, and $3 billion for education. There is a call to redirect some of this funding to support veterans, including a request for $13 million for a national call center for homeless veterans and $17.2 billion for mental health services. The suggestion is to prioritize American veterans over illegal immigrants and to increase funding for caregiver support programs instead of education for undocumented individuals. The frustration with the current administration's choices is evident, emphasizing the need for a shift in focus toward veterans' needs.

Today, the speaker expresses their disappointment in the government as they turn in their gear after four years of active duty with the army. They were ordered to leave expensive gear in Afghanistan two years ago, but now they are being charged $500 to $1,000 for it. The speaker criticizes the government for prioritizing other expenses, such as giving money to the Taliban, Ukraine, and student debt relief, while neglecting their own soldiers. They express their excitement to separate from the army and start serving their country. Another person in the video shares the amount they are being charged upon leaving service and mentions their Venmo for anyone willing to help.

The speaker discusses a significant increase in military spending and changes in the National Defense Act. They mention potential use of the military against Canadian citizens in case of emergencies like a trucker convoy. The document also hints at Canadian Armed Forces assisting domestic law enforcement, which raises concerns. Minister Blair explains the role of the military in supporting civil authority. This raises questions and prompts viewers to share their thoughts in the comments.

In Canada, the inflation rate has reached a point where active members of the Canadian Armed Forces are struggling to afford the cost of living. Some of these members have even resorted to seeking help from others. The housing crisis is also severe, with three veterans having to live in their cars because they cannot afford suitable housing in the areas they have been posted to. Despite these challenges, these individuals continue to put on their uniforms and go to work for the Canadian Armed Forces.

Around 35,000 people were lost in the chain of communication within the armed forces and veterans community, which is a significant blow to our small military. The Canadian military is currently unable to defend our own country, let alone participate in NATO conflicts. During the 20-year Afghanistan war, we lost around 53 people, while self-inflicted casualties caused by our own actions have reached 3,000 to 4,000. This has severely weakened our military, which should ideally have around 100,000 personnel but currently only has about 40,000. The damage inflicted on our Canadian Armed Forces is far greater than that of Afghanistan, and a comparable hit hasn't been seen since World War II.

Retired corporal Brock Blaschak, a Canadian veteran, shares his experience of being severely wounded in Afghanistan and expresses his disappointment with the government's lack of support. He mentions the promise made by the Prime Minister in 2015, stating that no veteran would have to fight for the support they deserve. However, he points out that the government is currently engaged in a legal battle with veterans over equal support and compensation. Blaschak also criticizes the government's reintegration program for ISIS members and the backdoor deal made with Omar Kadar. In response, the Prime Minister explains that they are unable to provide more than what is currently being offered to veterans.

The speaker condemns the Canadian government, saying, "That's your Canadian government right there that just did this." They note, "I went to Bosnia, Somalia, and Afghanistan, and I did not fucking serve my country for this bullshit that's fucking in front of us." They add, "Right? The government has committed their own."

Today, the speaker expresses their disappointment with the government as they turn in their gear after four years of active duty with the army. They were ordered to leave expensive gear in Afghanistan two years ago and are now being charged $500 to $1,000 for it. The speaker criticizes the government for prioritizing funding for the Taliban, Ukraine, student debt relief, and stimulus checks over covering their gear expenses. They feel that the government's priorities are backwards and that soldiers are their last concern. Despite feeling bittersweet about leaving, the speaker is excited to serve their country outside of the government. Another person in the video shares that they are being charged $3,501 upon leaving service and mentions their Venmo for anyone willing to help.

Canada’s armed forces are facing a recruitment challenge as fewer young people are willing to enlist, according to a recent audit. The CBC's Deanna Sumanac Johnson examines how the military is attempting to boost enlistment and retention. Adam Yo, in his last year of study in the University of Waterloo’s math program, is considering a career in the military after his cadet days. He believes Canada will become more geopolitically relevant due to its natural resources and strategic interests, and he would like to be part of that vision. The federal government is backing this effort with a substantial investment—an appropriation of 20.4 billion dollars intended to strengthen the Canadian Armed Forces through retention and recruitment initiatives. Yet public perception among young Canadians toward military service remains complex. In an Angus Reid survey, when asked whether they could foresee an armed conflict that would compel them to volunteer for military service in a combat role, 43 percent of eighteen- to thirty-four-year-olds said yes, compared with 55 percent of those aged fifty-five and older. Experts note that some of the hesitancy stems from misconceptions about the military. A common belief is that all paths lead to combat, whereas in reality there are a wide range of occupations available, nearly as varied as those in civilian life. To address this, military recruiters emphasize appealing to the emotional and experiential aspects of service. They advocate portraying military life as full of adventure and excitement, highlighting opportunities such as field exercises, survival training, and cutting-edge operations. Recruits also stress the importance of visible incentives in attracting young people during economically uncertain times. The current economy features high youth unemployment, and stable pay with the potential for career security becomes a key selling point. One recruit in basic training notes that salary stability is a compelling factor, especially when discussing with peers who are struggling to find jobs after graduation. The message recruiters are promoting is that a military career offers job security and a solid income. In summary, recruiters are pursuing a dual strategy: correcting misconceptions about the breadth of roles available in the armed forces and leveraging the appeal of adventure and security to attract young Canadians. They are operating within an environment of an uncertain economy and rising patriotism, aiming to make military service an attractive and stable option for new graduates and young adults. Deanna Sumanac Johnson, CBC News, Toronto.

The federal government spent $66 billion on illegal immigrants in 2023, compared to $3 billion on homeless veterans. The speaker questions this allocation and suggests redirecting funds to support veterans. They propose using portions of the $66 billion for a national call center, mental health services, and caregiver support programs for veterans. The speaker criticizes the Biden administration for not prioritizing American veterans over illegal immigrants. They emphasize the importance of redirecting funds to support those who have served the country.

The speaker condemns the current actions of the Canadian government, asserting that “that’s your Canadian government right there that just did this.” They remind the audience that they themselves served in Bosnia, Somalia, and Afghanistan, and they state that they did not serve their country for “this bullshit that’s fucking in front of us.” They emphasize agreement with the sentiment by asking, “Right?” and then assert that “the government has committed their own fucking atrocity at this Canadian government.” The speaker reiterates the point with “Right?” signaling concurrence and emphasis on the perceived atrocity by the government.

Failing to account for $850 billion in the DOD budget is concerning. While a failed audit doesn't automatically mean waste, fraud, or abuse, it raises questions about accountability and responsible spending. The inability to track how this money was spent leads to justifiable concerns, especially when considering issues like food insecurity on military bases. The contrast between a massive military budget and struggles to provide basic services highlights a disconnect for many. Seeing a $50 billion increase in the Pentagon budget after twenty years of war, while service members rely on food stamps, fuels perceptions of corruption. This isn't about personal attacks, but about the disconnect between massive spending and the realities faced by those in the military.

We spent $8 trillion on the war in Iraq and got nothing in return. We killed more Iraqis than Saddam Hussein, created ISIS, and caused millions of refugees. Then we spent $16 trillion on the pandemic with no results. Now we're doing bank bailouts regularly. The government cut Medicare for 15 million Americans while sending extra money to Ukraine. A friend had his food stamps cut by 90%, leaving him with only $25 a month. 30 million Americans are starving, which is unacceptable. We're failing to take care of those who played by the rules and promised to be taken care of in old age.

The speaker claims that law C-69 guarantees there will not be a one-stop shop because it requires the Canadian government to duplicate regulations. They argue that there should be strong rules enforced once, rather than multiple levels of regulation. The speaker states that it currently takes seventeen years to get a major project approved in Canada. They assert that in the last ten years, Canada has had the worst economic growth and cannot afford a fourth Liberal term.

Our money is missing in various government spending areas, yet they track our small expenses. The lack of accountability is evident in billions lost in Ukraine aid, California's homeless funds, military spending, and pandemic relief. Despite high taxes, our country lacks infrastructure. The frustration is building as citizens feel robbed and marginalized. The speaker urges unity among Americans to confront government negligence.

According to the Federation For American Immigration, the federal government spent $66 billion on illegal immigrants in 2023, compared to $3 billion on homeless veterans. The speaker questioned why this allocation makes sense, suggesting the numbers are comparable. The speaker itemized $5.8 billion in SNAP, $10 billion in Medicare, $8.2 billion in uncompensated hospital expenditures, and $3 billion for primary and secondary education for illegal immigrants. The speaker suggested redirecting funds from the $66 billion to address veterans' needs, such as the White House's requested $13 million for a national call center for homeless veterans, $17.2 billion for veterans' mental health, and $2.9 billion for caregiver support programs. The speaker claimed the Biden administration is responsible for the current allocation of funds.