TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker cites a rapid rise in autism: "one in ten thousand children had autism" in the distant past, then "one in twenty thousand," then "one in ten thousand," and now "one in thirty one" overall, with boys at "one in twelve" in some areas, notably California. "Since February, autism rates have surged by much more than four hundred percent." He questions why and argues researchers should be appreciated rather than attacked for seeking answers. On stage were doctors, and he said, "this is what we gotta we have to find out." He adds, "Because when you go from 20,000 to 10,000 and then you go to 12, you know there's something artificial. They're taking something."

In 2016, the autism rate was one in fifty-four, and in 2000, it was one in one hundred and fifty. A study in Wisconsin looked at 900,000 kids and found the rate to be point seven out of 10,000, which is less than one in 10,000.

The current ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is one in thirty-one, with an extreme risk for boys. The risk for boys of getting an autism diagnosis in this country is one in twenty, and one in 12.5 in California. Two years ago, the prevalence was one in thirty-six. Since the first ADDM report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8, or 480%. Twenty-two years ago, prevalence was one in 150 children. In all the core states, the trend is consistently upward, and most cases are now severe. About 25% of kids diagnosed with autism are nonverbal, non-toilet trained, and have stereotypical features like head banging, tactile and light sensitivities, stimming, and toe walking.

About 25% of kids with autism are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and exhibit stereotypical behaviors, and this population is growing. While many individuals with autism are doing well, the speaker focuses on this specific group with severe disabilities. The media promotes the idea that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria, but studies disprove this. In 2013, the California legislature asked the Mind Institute at UC Davis to investigate whether the rise in autism is real or due to increased awareness. The Mind Institute concluded it is a real epidemic. The speaker argues that this epidemic is unique to children, as full-blown autism (nonverbal, non-toilet trained) is rarely seen in older adults. While the speaker has encountered people with Asperger's or on the spectrum who are their age, they have never seen an older individual with full-blown autism, despite its prevalence in children, affecting one in twenty boys, and in California, one in 12.5 boys.

In 1987, 330 out of every million children were diagnosed with autism. Today, that number is 27,777 per million. To deny an autism epidemic, one must believe that researchers in North Dakota missed 98.8% of autistic children, including thousands with profound disabilities who were somehow invisible to doctors, teachers, parents, and their own study. The same researchers followed the original group for 12 years and, upon double-checking, found they had missed only one child. Doctors and therapists in the past were not missing all these cases, therefore the epidemic is real.

The speaker states that autism is a preventable disease caused by environmental exposure, not genes, though genes can provide vulnerability. A study by Blacksell et al. estimates the cost of treating autism in the US will be a trillion dollars a year by 2035, adding to already astronomical healthcare costs. According to Irva Herzbachoda, research into genetic causes of autism receives 10 to 20 times more funding than research into environmental factors, which is where the answer lies. Autism destroys families and children, many of whom were fully functional before regressing around age two due to environmental exposure. These children may never hold a job, pay taxes, or live independently. The speaker believes "we are doing this to our children" and it needs to end.

- an estimated a hundred and fifteen thousand children develop autism every year in The United States. - And if doctor Sally Ozanoff's work is correct, and she's at UC Davis, she shows that eighty eight percent of autism cases are characterized by regression. - Now regression suggests an acute toxic exposure, not genetics, not better awareness, an acute toxic exposure, which means that most cases of autism are preventable. - Autism is not a medical or scientific mystery. - We know beyond a reasonable doubt that toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants, are causing autism. - If we repeal the 1980 Bayh Dole Act, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and the 2005 PREP Act, that would remove the structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic disease epidemics in this country.

- The meteoric rise in autism is among the most alarming public health developments in history. There's never been anything like this. - And now it's one in thirty one, but in some areas, it's much worse than that, if you can believe it. One in thirty one. - For boys, it's one in twelve. - And by the way, I think I can say that there are certain groups of people that don't take vaccines and don't take any pills that have no autism, that have no autism. - They're pumping it looks like they're pumping into a horse. - You have a little child, little fragile child, and he get a a vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess. - 80 different blends, and they pump it in.

The current ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is one in thirty-one, with an extreme risk for boys. The risk for boys of getting an autism diagnosis in this country is one in twenty, and one in 12.5 in California. Since the first ADDM report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8 (480%). Twenty-two years ago, the prevalence was one in 150 children. In all the core states, the trend is consistently upward, and most cases are now severe. About 25% of kids diagnosed with autism are nonverbal, non-toilet trained, and have stereotypical features like head banging, tactile and light sensitivities, stimming, and toe walking.

Autism rates are rising, currently estimated at one in thirty-one and one in twelve, a significant increase from one in ten thousand in the speaker's childhood. A large-scale testing and research initiative involving hundreds of scientists worldwide has been launched. By September, the speaker claims they will know the cause of the autism epidemic and be able to eliminate the exposures responsible.

We are vaccinating infants against risks that don't exist. There has to be a quantifiable risk that we're trying to prevent. We introduce a synthetic vaccine to their little immune system before they've even had breast milk, causing a reaction to a disease that they don't have and weren't exposed to in the first few days of life. This is why we have skyrocketing rates of autism, attention deficit disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. When I graduated high school in 1988, I didn't know a single autistic child. Now, my 16-year-old daughter knows 10.

"Chronic disease has gone from twelve point eight percent in our children in the nineteen eighties to over fifty four percent of our kids now." "72 times we are altering the immune system of our children with our vaccine program." "There'd be one easy study to rule it out, compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children." "But we don't know because they've never done the study." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities."

Speaker 0 claimed that none of the 72 vaccines mandated for children has ever been safety tested in relicensing placebo-controlled trials. He said Fauci has been denying this for eight years and recounted a 2016 appointment by President Trump to run a vaccine safety commission, where he asked Fauci and Collins to meet with him with White House counsel. He stated that at that meeting Fauci said, “you say I’m lying,” and promised to send the study, but he never received it. He asserted that he sued Fauci and Aaron Siri, and after a year of stonewalling, government lawyers admitted on the courthouse steps that they never had any study, and provided a written acknowledgment. He pointed to a CHC website and his own website where the letter from HHS is posted. He claimed there is “no downstream liability” and “no front end safety testing,” which he said saves vaccine makers a quarter of a billion dollars. He further argued there is no marketing and advertising cost because the federal government orders 78,000,000 school kids to take that vaccine every year. He described a “gold rush” to add vaccines to the schedule, which he argued is unnecessary for most of them, and claimed many vaccines target diseases that are not even casually contagious. He contended that once a vaccine is on the recommended schedule, it becomes a billion-dollar-a-year business for the company. He asserted that NIH bears royalties in many cases. According to him, a set of vaccines expanded to 72 shots and 16 vaccines contributed to a dramatic increase in vaccine offerings. He linked this expansion to a broader push around vaccines, including the HPV vaccine. He also claimed that in 1989 there was an explosion of chronic disease in American children, including neurological diseases, ADD, ADHD, sleep disorders, language delays, ASD (autism), Tourette syndrome, tics, and narcolepsy. He stated that autism prevalence rose from one in ten thousand generations ago to one in thirty-four children today, citing CDC data. Overall, the summary repeats assertions about the lack of placebo-controlled safety testing, the admission of no study, financial and regulatory incentives to expand vaccine schedules, and a sharp rise in diagnosed neurological and developmental conditions beginning around 1989.

Today, our most recent numbers are one in every thirty one kids. It's probably actually much worse than that because California, which has the best collection system, is reporting one out of every nineteen American children. As odds as one in every twelve point five boys. So it's gone from one less than one in ten thousand in 1970 to one in twelve point five boys those numbers. There has to be something artificially causing this, meaning a drug or something. We will. So one in ten thousand, and now it's one in thirty one or thirty four or twelve if it's a boy. Can you imagine that? One in twelve. That's for a boy. On average, 12.5 boys. It's not even believable that that could be. I've been hearing these numbers that and they get worse and worse every year. This there's gotta be something. I think there's nothing, including favored nations and everything else, there's nothing that can be if you can find out the reason that that's happening, and I know we're gonna do some things. I think it's I think we think we maybe know the reason, and I look forward to that press conference, to be with you in that press conference. That's gonna be a great thing. Thank you, Bob. You're doing a great job.

My son, born in 1991, has Asperger's, and I've heard from many parents of children with similar conditions. Since 1989, the vaccine schedule increased significantly, exposing children to much higher levels of mercury than deemed safe. For instance, newborns receive a hepatitis B shot that would require a child weighing 275 pounds to safely absorb under EPA guidelines. In 1988, 1 in 2,500 American children had autism; now it's 1 in 166, with many also facing learning and neurological disorders. Despite the alarming trends, the federal government claims there's no solid science linking vaccines to these issues. While we can't definitively prove a connection now, I believe future research will reveal a link between vaccines and autism.

In 1989, the vaccine schedule increased from 10 to 24 vaccines, all containing thimerosal with mercury. Children are injected with 400 times the amount of mercury considered safe by the FDA or EPA. A newborn receives a hepatitis B shot, but under EPA guidelines, would have to be 275 pounds to safely absorb it. In 1988, autism affected 1 in 2,500 children; now it affects 1 in 166. Additionally, 1 in 6 children have learning, neurological, speech, or language disorders, ADD, or hyperactivity, all connected to autism. The federal government claims there's no good science linking vaccines to autism, but science is often diluted in politics. While it can't be proven now, intuitively, the speaker believes that thimerosal causes autism.

As a long-term autism researcher and director of the New Jersey Autism Study, the speaker discusses the dramatic increase in autism prevalence. When the study began with the CDC, it was expected that autism prevalence would remain stable, unlike other neurological disorders. However, autism rates have increased significantly, from a rare disability affecting 1 in 10,000 to being present in every community. The speaker asserts that this increase is real and not solely due to better awareness. In New Jersey, rates have increased by 300% in 20 years, a trend confirmed by CDC reports and other data sources. The speaker believes future reports will show even higher rates, suggesting an urgent public health crisis. The speaker urges a focus on understanding the environmental or risk factors triggering autism, claiming that despite data collection, there has been a lack of real progress in understanding the causes, prevention, or effective treatment of autism. The speaker encourages a careful review of the CDC report and its supplemental tables to recognize autism as a true phenomenon requiring investigation into its root causes.

CDC data indicates autism rates are now 1 in 31 children, but California, with the best data collection, shows 1 in 20 children are autistic, and 1 in 12.5 boys. Minority numbers are even worse. About 25% of autistic children are low functioning, meaning they are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and exhibit stereotypical behaviors like head banging, biting, toe walking, and stimming. This population with severe intellectual disability is growing.

There is nothing more profitable than a sick child because insurance companies, hospitals, the medical cartel, and pharmaceutical companies profit from them. The earlier a child is sick, the more profitable they are. When the speaker's uncle was president, 6% of Americans had chronic disease; today, it's 60%. The annual cost of treating chronic disease was zero then, but now it's about $4.3 trillion, and none of it is necessary. In 1960, the autism rate was between one in 1,500 and one in 10,000. Today, according to the CDC, it's one in every 34 kids, and in some states, like California, Utah, and New Jersey, it's one in 22. These children should be healthy and high-performing, but instead, they have an extraordinary disability. Full-blown autism can result in nonverbal, non-toilet-trained children who will never graduate high school or live independently.

Autism rates have skyrocketed, with 1 in 10,070 men over 70 affected compared to 1 in 34 kids today. The speaker questions why allergies and autism were rare in their generation but prevalent now, costing the country $1 trillion annually. They emphasize the need to address this issue that is impacting so many children.

The ADDM report indicates an alarming increase in autism prevalence. The ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is now 1 in 31, with a higher risk for boys, 1 in 20 overall, and 1 in 12.5 in California. Since the first report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8. About 25% of diagnosed children are nonverbal and have severe symptoms. The speaker disputes the idea that increased prevalence is solely due to better diagnoses. Referencing table three of the ADDM report, they claim the rates are genuinely increasing year by year. They cite a Wisconsin study of 900,000 children that found autism in less than 1 in 10,000, compared to today's 1 in 31. A 1987 North Dakota study found a rate of 3.3 per 10,000. A national collaborative perinatal project between 1959 and 1965 found 4.7 cases per 10,000. A UC Davis MIND Institute study concluded that the autism epidemic is real.

There is nothing more profitable in our society today than a sick child, with insurance companies, hospitals, the medical cartel, and pharmaceutical companies having lifetime annuities; the speaker says they want kids sick for the rest of their lives, creating a whole generation. When my uncle was president, six percent of Americans had chronic disease today at sixty percent. The annual cost of treating chronic disease was Zero back then; today it's about $4,300,000,000,000. For autism, in 1960 the rate was reportedly about one in twenty five hundred, one in fifteen hundred, one in twenty five hundred, one in ten thousand; today it's one in thirty four kids according to the CDC, with states like California, Utah, and New Jersey at one in 22. These kids should be healthy; these kids shouldn't be our highest performing kids.

If the autism epidemic is due to better diagnostics, it should be seen in older people, but it is not. Where are the 71-year-olds with full-blown autism? They are not seen in malls, homes, or institutions. The speaker claims this absence indicates a falsehood, likely perpetuated by industries profiting from an environmental toxin in air, water, medicines, or food. These industries benefit from normalizing autism and claiming it has always existed. The speaker asserts it is not good for the country or the press to not be skeptical. New studies will soon be announced to identify the specific environmental toxins causing autism, which the speaker claims has not been done before. The speaker anticipates providing answers to the American people quickly.

In 2016, the autism rate was 1 in 54, and in 2000, it was 1 in 150. One speaker asks what the rate was in the past and what is causing the change. Another speaker cites a peer-reviewed study in Wisconsin that looked at 900,000 children and found the rate to be 0.7 out of 10,000, which is less than 1 in 10,000.

At one time, not too long ago, one out of a hundred thousand children were diagnosed with autism. Now it's one in thirty one. The speaker calls that "ridiculous" and describes it as a "'massive spike in autism'." The opposition claims the rise is due to better ways of diagnosing it. The speaker counters that if that were true, then you would look into every single nursing home and they would be filled with autistic people, and you don't see that. If you personally had a child with autism, wouldn't you want someone to look deeply and widely at every possibility? I mean, that's just common sense.