reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses their reluctance to go to war and highlights the strength of the United States military. They humorously comment on the current generation of 18 to 25-year-olds, referring to them as life coaches and bloggers who wouldn't want to participate in a draft. They mention the importance of young men in building the country and make a joke about how they wouldn't be able to handle a civil war today due to various reasons like allergies and social media distractions. The speaker concludes by mentioning hurtful comments received on social media from soldiers.

The speaker strongly opposes the idea of drafting their daughter for war. They criticize the government for starting wars to benefit arms manufacturers and bankers. They argue that recruitment numbers are low because of lies told by recruiters and the lack of support for injured veterans. The speaker believes that people are unwilling to fight and that women should not be forced to do so. They express anger towards the government for high taxes, surveillance, economic ruin, and corruption. The speaker concludes by stating that people will do anything to protect their children and that women should not be sent to fight in foreign wars.

The speaker expresses distrust of law enforcement, recalling their transition from public servants to "Orwellian authoritarians" during the pandemic in New York City, enforcing mask mandates and curfews. They claim veterans are realizing they are "peons" of a controlled government. The speaker anticipates a "fork in the road" where individuals must decide what they are willing to die for, stating "I'm not fucking dying for Israel. I'm not dying for this country." They suggest the country's sovereignty and protection of its identity are compromised, and identify the "head of the snake" as the root cause.

The transcript portrays a chaotic confrontation during a congressional hearing on U.S. involvement in a war tied to Israel and Iran. The speakers push a stance that America does not want to fight this war for Israel, repeatedly asserting that “America does not wanna fight this war for Israel” and “America does not wanna fight this war in Iran, and the soldiers don't. Right?” They claim there is a war in Iran and that “our military brothers and sisters are going to die for Israel,” insisting that they do not want to die for Israel and urging to “Stop the war in Iran right now.” Throughout, Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 heckle the officials, describing the officials as robots and criticizing their focus, with expressions like “Look at you guys. You're robots. A US senator. You won't even look back” and “What is happening right now? I front robots. Shame.” They demand that those at the hearing “please cooperate with us” and “go behind the line,” while noting that the audience should be cleared and the hallways opened. A Marine veteran interrupts the hearing, drawing attention to the dissent. The veteran, identified later as Brian McGinnis, is described as interrupting the hearing because “there is a war in Iran, and our military brothers and sisters are going to die for Israel, and we are here to say no. We do not support Israel. We do not wanna die for Israel. Stop the war in Iran right now.” The confrontation becomes physical: “they pulled him out, got his arm trapped in a door, broke his arm, like, tackled him to the ground.” He is reported to have suffered a broken left arm, and there is an impassioned plea for medical attention as others note, “What did they do to him?” and “He broke his arm.” Witnesses describe the scene as “very intense” and express anger toward those at the hearing, calling them “cowards” for not facing the interruption. There is a recurring theme of opposition to intervention: “Palestine will be free,” referenced in the chant “From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli. Palestine will be free.” The speakers repeatedly reiterate that they do not want to fight for Israel and that they oppose both the war in Iran and the broader U.S. commitment to military action in the region. The exchange ends with a insistence to move people aside to allow passage and to maintain order, while the speakers emphasize their demand that the United States should not engage in the war in Iran or fight for Israel.

The speaker urges people to resist an administration that is predominantly male, white, and outdated. They emphasize that they will not remain silent or disappear.

The speaker discusses how acts of violence against Palestinians are ignored by the military. They believe the root issue is the occupation of Palestinian territory, which inherently lacks morality. The speaker regrets following orders to use flashbang grenades to assert control. They argue that the occupation must end for security for both Palestinians and Israelis.

Many people are being forced to choose between staying silent and risking their lives. There are those who want to take everyone, regardless of their background, not just soldiers but any man who fears avoiding war more than dying in it. The decision-makers in your country are protecting their own children.

The speaker describes human trafficking as an absolutely horrific practice and is prepared to bring full force to solve this problem. The speaker says they were taught that if they worked hard, they could become like "them" one day. They state that sometimes they were taught to believe that heroes were villains and villains were heroes. As they started waking up, they were labeled conspiracy theorists and deplorables. They say they are digital soldiers fighting in the greatest war the world has never seen. The speaker claims their weapon is truth, while their opponent's weapon is censorship. They move from battlefield to battlefield, doing what they can to wake the rest of the world up, and they will never give up.

The speaker references Henry Kissinger’s book Kiss the Boys Goodbye, urging viewers to get the book. He claims Kissinger writes that United States military people are “a bunch of dogs,” explaining that they wear dog tags and are treated as animals, so nobody cares if they are killed. He then attacks George Bush’s mother, describing her as “incredibly ugly” and “scary” and quoting a famous TV moment about American soldiers dying in the Middle East: “why should I waste my mind, my beautiful mind on people dying? … I like what the hell do I care? Man, I’m dying.” He portrays Bush’s mother as suggesting Americans do not matter to those in power. The speaker explains the term “GI” as “government issue,” noting that the government provides soldiers’ clothing, shoes, vehicles, underwear, food, and all equipment, implying soldiers are mere government-issued items. He asks why, after war, the United States Corporation does not retrieve and clean up all the junk—oil cans, tires, jeeps, and trash—that were used in war, arguing that since the war is over, everything is “a government issue” and thus disposable. He claims soldiers are left behind, even in places like Cambodia, insinuating they are treated as expendable “GIs” rather than human beings. He then pivots to a broader, conspiratorial claim: for fifty-three years of his life, he has spent seventy-one years observing the world, with fifty-three years in what he calls the world of the occult. He defines occult as a Latin word meaning hidden, asserting that everything of importance has been hidden and that those at the top know things ordinary people do not. He contends that the speaker has made it his business to discover these hidden truths and that the most astonishing finding is how little people know about the world they live in. Addressing younger viewers, he urges them to wake up, get a life, and start figuring out who owns them, criticizing public discourses about ownership of one’s body on the New York Stock Exchange. The overall message blends anti-war sentiment, distrust of political elites, and a claim of hidden knowledge guarded by a powerful, occult-leaning elite.

Speaker 0 cites Henry Kissinger’s book Kiss the Boys Goodbye, urging viewers to get the book. In the book, Kissinger allegedly says United States military people are “a bunch of dogs” and “dogs” because they wear dog tags, implying nobody cares if they get killed. They also reference George Bush’s mother, described as “incredibly ugly” and “scary,” who allegedly said on national television about Americans being killed in the Middle East: “why should I waste my mind, my beautiful mind on people dying? Hell, I like what the hell do I care? Man, I’m dying.” This quote is presented as the president’s mother stating that America doesn’t care about its soldiers, reinforcing the claim that soldiers are expendable. The speaker explains the term GI as “government issue,” noting that the government issues pants, shoes, car, underwear, food, and everything else. Therefore, soldiers are “government issue,” like an oil can, a tire, or any other item the government issues. The point is made that after a war ends, the United States Corporation does not go back to Vietnam (or other theaters) to collect trash—oil cans, tires, jeeps, tanks—because the trash and junk are blown up; the war is over, so it’s all “government issue.” Consequently, soldiers are left behind, in what the speaker describes as a concentration camp in Cambodia, and the refrain repeats: “leave him, he’s just a GI, a government issue.” The speaker then shifts to a personal confession: at seventy-one years old, he has spent fifty-three years in the world of the occult. The word occult is defined as Latin for “hidden,” asserting that what is important has been hidden and that those at the top know things others don’t. He emphasizes that this realization has astounding him about how much people don’t know about the world they live in. He urges young people watching to wake up and “get a life” and start figuring out who owns them. He questions “all this crap about people owning your body on this New York Stock Exchange,” implying ownership or control by powerful entities. In sum, the speaker presents a sequence of provocative claims linking Kissinger’s alleged statements, the Bush family quote about indifference to soldiers’ deaths, a harsh critique of the GI concept and postwar neglect, a long personal claim about occult knowledge, and a warning to wake up to hidden powers allegedly controlling people.

The speaker's message to the people of Gaza is that they have achieved victory. The speaker expresses shame for not doing enough and insists that change must come in the form of the fall of the American empire and imperial western powers, which they claim have been hurting people since the beginning. The speaker believes these empires will fall, inshallah. The message to Gaza and oppressed people worldwide is that people are willing to fight and put their lives on the line to bring these empires down.

Today, the speaker expresses their disappointment in the government as they turn in their gear after four years of active duty with the army. They were ordered to leave expensive gear in Afghanistan two years ago, but now they are being charged $500 to $1,000 for it. The speaker criticizes the government for prioritizing other expenses, such as giving money to the Taliban, Ukraine, and student debt relief, while neglecting their own soldiers. They express their excitement to separate from the army and start serving their country. Another person in the video shares the amount they are being charged upon leaving service and mentions their Venmo for anyone willing to help.

We are soldiers in a war, unsure of our purpose. A raise is tempting, but I won't succumb to the devil's offer. It's time for a change in what we're fighting for.

Speaker 0: You said no to war, and I heard you. I thought, what a blessing you are. May your heart stay pure and always protected. May your actions and morals stay connected, because our hearts have been tainted like black tea spilled on a Persian rug leaving a stain. We used to think the same. We wanted to play a good hand at this game, but the moment we heard our mothers wailing, we folded. There's no justice in this life. Our faith has eroded. They keep killing our children in the name of God. We watch Seppar's father searching for his son amongst countless body bags filled with women and children and innocent men. We also never considered war an option before then, before we witnessed our mothers burn in grieving flames. It wasn't required to jump over fire when New Year's came. Every stride they took, they were burning like a furnace. Every step turned to ash where their hearts used to beat. Their pain turned soft souls into something concrete. May you never know the pain of a whole entire nation begging to be saved by foreign invasion. They say, I don't understand. Why would you agree to war? What a blessing it is that you don't understand my love. I hope you never know the pain of people begging to be bombed where your death is so close, but it feels like hope. Maybe in another life, every country will rush to save us instead of fighting over whether Trump has the right to invade us. They'll fight over who gets the honor of being our savior. They'll argue over credit for our liberation and for once we'll have a choice and who our leader gets to be, not imposed but chosen will finally be free. It's good you don't believe in more. What beautiful way of thinking. What a blessing it is to not know the feeling of clinging to the first life raft that comes in your direction, not caring for a second about their intention, not pausing for reflection, just to fight against death. My love, I'm glad you still believe there's a wrong and a right, but I've seen a place where that line disappears, where survival speaks louder than morals and fears, what a blessing to breathe and still have a voice, to question the hand and still have a choice. But when your lungs start to fail and you're drowning with no air, you don't care who it is, you just hope that they're there. You clutch at the life raft, no time left away, whose hands pulling you up or what price you will pay, head barely above water, grief flooding your sight. You don't choose your savior. You choose to survive.

When raising their right hand, soldiers swear an oath to every generation. Before the nation, there was an army. Unity is worth the fight, and soldiers carry that legacy forward. Both grandfathers of one speaker served in the Second World War, and it is their goal to meet the challenges of their time head on. There's strength and realness in the bonds of the team because your life depends on these people. An American soldier is a warrior and a member of the team, serving the people of the United States and leading the army values. They will never accept defeat and will never quit, remaining trained and proficient in warrior tasks. Guarding the tomb of the unknown soldier is one of the most honorable jobs in the military, thinking about those soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice. The uniform is a symbol of trust and represents the highest ideals of the country.

I am returning my global war on terrorism medal and national defense medal because they are both fives. I am giving back my medals for the people of Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and all victims of occupation worldwide. Specifically, I dedicate this medal to the children of Iraq who have lost their parents. As a nuclear, biological, and chemical specialist, I served in a war that had no weapons of mass destruction, leading me to desert. I am one of 40,000 individuals who left the US Armed Forces due to this lie. Do these medals truly acknowledge a job well done, or do they conceal lies, corruption, and the mistreatment of young men and women?

Today, the speaker expresses their disappointment with the government as they turn in their gear after four years of active duty with the army. They were ordered to leave expensive gear in Afghanistan two years ago and are now being charged $500 to $1,000 for it. The speaker criticizes the government for prioritizing funding for the Taliban, Ukraine, student debt relief, and stimulus checks over covering their gear expenses. They feel that the government's priorities are backwards and that soldiers are their last concern. Despite feeling bittersweet about leaving, the speaker is excited to serve their country outside of the government. Another person in the video shares that they are being charged $3,501 upon leaving service and mentions their Venmo for anyone willing to help.

Speaker 1 describes a decision to follow conscience after twenty years in the military, mostly deployed to the Middle East. He explains that after multiple deployments he realized “we weren't there for the reasons that our government told us” and that there was no vital national interest in the current fight. He made a promise to himself about twenty years ago not to send young Americans off to die on foreign battlefields if he ever had a position of responsibility. When given that opportunity, he decided to resign, stating he did not want to send others to die in wars he believed were not in the nation’s interest. Speaker 0 notes their Catholic faith and mentions recent comments by the Holy Father highlighting concerns for innocent civilians harmed by conflict, including the killing of Father Pierre in Lebanon. The question is asked whether faith community or religious leaders’ support has helped. Speaker 1 responds that the support has been huge and that the resignation gained more traction than he expected. He emphasizes that although the decision was not made lightly, faith helped him hear “God's voice” and guided him to take action, which made the act feel easy and liberating. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 has hope for America. Speaker 1 affirms having a great deal of hope, calling this an exciting moment. He highlights the power of technology to connect like‑minded people and give them a voice, despite potential downsides. He notes the significant presence and enthusiasm of young people in the room, expressing optimism about the next generation. Speaker 1 outlines what he believes must happen moving forward: during the midterm season and as the war progresses, people should be on their knees in prayer, then take action once upright. He argues that leaders must hear the public’s stance against this war and the lack of a vital national security interest, calling for the troops to come home and for efforts toward peace in the region. He asserts a desire to avoid “twenty plus more years of bloodletting” and urges people from all political parties to pressure representatives to oppose continued overseas wars. Speaker 1 clarifies that he is not advocating pacifism; if the country is attacked or there is an imminent threat, actions will be taken. The core message is that the nation must not continue down the current path, and making this stance clear to leaders is essential to preserving hope.

The speaker traveled the country to educate people about immigrants' contributions and the U.S.'s history as a nation of immigrants. The speaker asserts that no one wants to farm now, and that people are done picking cotton. The speaker states that people cannot be paid enough to return to a plantation.

Soldiers return their medals in protest of wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Palestine. They reject the idea that the medals symbolize democracy and justice, instead calling them meaningless. They apologize for the destruction caused by the wars and express solidarity with the people affected. Medals are returned in honor of civilians who died and to live by conscience. The focus is on corporate interests driving conflict, not enemies overseas.

As someone proud of military service, the speaker expresses discomfort with the current atmosphere around the monuments, stating it "looks wrong, feels wrong." The speaker feels there should be a separation between the military and civilian life, and that the current situation resembles "Pyongyang on a Saturday." The speaker is joining a few thousand people who share this view and hopes for rain.

The speaker emphasizes that the US will need to send their sons and daughters to war just like they currently do. They stress that this is a natural consequence and that people will die, which they find to be a terrible thing.

The speaker, a British individual, expresses their concern about the situation in Gaza and questions the lack of empathy and care for humanity. They share their personal connection to the Palestinian conflict through their father's experiences. They criticize the American people for being unaware of their government's actions abroad and the potential consequences at home. The speaker believes that the American working class should stand up against their government's warmongering and prioritize their own well-being. They emphasize the need for unity and resistance to prevent the exploitation of working-class individuals for war.

The speaker states they are not a fan of war and are bewildered that humanity still engages in it. They believe war is designed to distract the average person with nonsense. The speaker also claims that those at the top profit from war.

The speaker discusses the horrors of war, including death, violence, and suffering. They mention that these aspects should not be talked about or communicated. They then show a concept of war that was presented as bloodless and successful, but in reality, it was a massacre. The speaker plays a word association game, mentioning words like Coca, Hollywood, and surgical, which evoke positive and consumerist connotations. The speaker sarcastically thanks the listener for being a compliant consumer.