reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker states they chose the future of Germany over clinging to a harmful past. They believe they have united the Volk and are marching towards a goal, warning anyone who stands in their way. They claim to have assigned money its proper role, with work as its foundation, and have reduced unemployment while stabilizing prices. The speaker asserts the German folk is peaceful but will defend itself. They cite the rebuilding of the Wehrmacht as protection for liberty and honor, restoring equality and pride to the German people. They argue this security is essential for economic prosperity. The speaker claims to have dismantled the treaty imposed upon them and restored the qualities of a free nation. They vow to prevent the Volk from being divided again. They express deep faith in God and believe their work, blessed by the omnipotent, cannot be undone. They declare that as long as the movement holds fast to its banner, no enemy can take it from them.

Nationalsozialisten, Parteigenossen, der Rückblick muss über 1933 hinausgehen. Der 30. Januar war für uns die Erfüllung nach vierzehn Jahren Kampf. Wir zogen nicht blind los, sondern sehend und glaubend. Ich bin dankbar für diesen Tag vor drei Jahren. Die Pioniere unserer Bewegung sind hier versammelt. Ich selbst habe diesen Kampf vierzehn Jahre lang geführt und die SA gegründet. Alles, was ihr seid, seid ihr durch mich, und alles, was ich bin, bin ich durch euch. Die Besten des deutschen Volkes standen schon damals in unseren Reihen. Wer heute gegen uns steht, tut dies, weil wir Deutschland wieder frei und stark gemacht haben. Das sind die Feinde unseres Volkes seit dem Krieg und der Revolution von 1918. Die Bewegung hat dem deutschen Volk Einheit gegeben. Wenn einer von uns stirbt, kommen zehn nach. Deutschland wird nie wieder in Schande versinken. Ihr, meine ältesten Parteikämpfer, seid die Garanten dafür. Aus euch wird eine junge Generation hervorgehen. Deutschland wird die Zeiten von November 1918 nicht wieder erleben. Wir wollen Frieden, aber wir stehen für Ehre ein. Deutschland hat seine Ehre vor der Welt zurückerlangt. Wir sind freie Weltbürger geworden. Die kommenden Jahre werden Opfer erfordern. Nationalsozialismus ist eine Lehre des Kampfes und der Arbeit. Was immer ihr opfert, deutsches Volk, wird nicht umsonst sein. Unser Deutsches Reich, unser Deutsches Volk und unsere Nationalsozialistische Bewegung, Sieg Heil, Sieg Heil, Sieg Heil! --- National Socialists, Party Comrades, the retrospective view must go beyond 1933. January 30th was the fulfillment for us after fourteen years of struggle. We did not set out blindly, but seeing and believing. I am grateful for this day three years ago. The pioneers of our movement are gathered here. I myself led this fight for fourteen years and founded the SA. Everything you are, you are through me, and everything I am, I am through you. The best of the German people were already in our ranks back then. Whoever stands against us today does so because we have made Germany free and strong again. These are the enemies of our people since the war and the revolution of 1918. The movement has given the German people unity. If one of us dies, ten will come after. Germany will never sink into disgrace again. You, my oldest party fighters, are the guarantors of this. A young generation will emerge from you. Germany will not relive the times of November 1918. We want peace, but we stand up for honor. Germany has regained its honor before the world. We have become free citizens of the world. The coming years will require sacrifices. National Socialism is a doctrine of struggle and work. Whatever you sacrifice, German people, will not be in vain. Our German Reich, our German Volk, and our National Socialist Movement, Sieg Heil, Sieg Heil, Sieg Heil!

Before 1914, Germany and Russia prevented Jewish world mastery because they weren't fully under Jewish control, unlike Western democracies. Germans and Russians had scorn for Jews, posing a threat of a leader like Frederick the Great. To counter this, the speaker claims the Jews pushed to overthrow monarchies, disguising it as a call for a sovereign people. The speaker alleges that Germany's guilt in WWI was failing to organize a strong enough defense to deter attacks or ensure victory. The speaker claims that in 1912, the Reichstag's refusal to raise three army corps, influenced by "democratic Marxist Jews," led to Germany's defeat. The speaker asserts that these same individuals disarmed Germany while inciting other nations to arm themselves. The speaker calls for recognition of the war's causes, labeling those responsible as "November criminals" who betrayed Germany. The speaker advocates for their execution. The speaker concludes by stating that honoring the sacrifices of those lost in the war requires building a new Germany.

Many believe England is united behind Churchill, but that's false. The British constitution has devolved into a dictatorship, not for the people's benefit but for a small elite. Historically, the British Empire was built by adventurers, but since Queen Victoria, its wealth has been exploited by a few. The current war isn't about national identity; it's a struggle between civilization and destructive ideologies. We face a choice: either succumb to tyranny or fight for a nationalist and socialist revolution. If we fail to defend our civilization, we risk losing everything built over 2,000 years. The fight is crucial, as history shows that civilizations can vanish. We must act to preserve our legacy, or we will be remembered only as a footnote in history, overshadowed by barbarism. Only time will reveal if my actions are deemed traitorous.

Since 1914, I have dedicated myself to my people with love and loyalty. I did not desire war in 1939, it was instigated by international statesmen of Jewish origin. Despite efforts for peace, war was wanted for business and by propaganda of international Jewry. I choose to remain in Berlin, refusing surrender to enemies. I urge soldiers to resist in the spirit of National Socialism. I ask my comrades to prioritize the nation's interests over personal feelings. Let us build a National Socialist state for future generations, serving the common good above all else. All Germans, National Socialists, and soldiers must remain faithful to the new government and resist international Jewry.

Speaker 0: The discussion reports that Russia has covertly tested three new weapon systems over the past twenty-eight days, with two of them described as complete game changers. These tests are said to be causing nerves inside NATO, and none of these three have been made public by President Putin, who typically announces such developments. One system, however, is not being kept secret. Speaker 0: According to the report, Russian President Putin just rolled out their most advanced hypersonic missiles to date. These missiles are described as "no one can shoot down"—at least in the view of the speaker—unless future assessments prove otherwise. The specific system named is the Orenshik Oreshnik hypersonic missiles. They are set for combat duty by the end of the year, and they are characterized as capable of extremely high speeds and long-range strikes. The deployment of these missiles is framed as something NATO will be watching very closely. The report suggests that European leaders are exhibiting a willingness to engage in war-related actions, with two particularly troubling points highlighted: the idea that they want to be part of the conflict and the accompanying casualties. It is claimed that they want to participate in the death and destruction in the European Union and in The UK. Speaker 0: The report specifically notes German Chancellor Mertz saying that they are ready to draft young men to war if they cannot reach their volunteer numbers, effectively suggesting compulsory service to fight Russia. Speaker 0: It is also stated that the UK is telling its populace to prepare to sacrifice their sons and daughters, and the speaker emphasizes that "Sons and daughters, colleagues, veterans will all have a part to play, to build, to serve, and if necessary, to fight." The speaker adds that more families will know what sacrifice for our nation means. Speaker 1: The accompanying commentary underscores the need to explain the changing threat and the necessity of staying ahead of it, reinforcing the idea that sacrifice and readiness are central to national defense in the current context.

Speaker 0 frames the situation as a war, not a battle, and insists we absolutely will win this war: "But this is a a war." "This isn't a battle, and we absolutely will win this war." "It is a war." "It is indeed a war." Acknowledging that "they have won some battles, Jasmine," the speaker says we must "keep our eye on the war" and that "and and everybody needs to pick up a weapon and and get involved" because "this is for the the safety and and lasting of the country." The message ends with a reiteration: "And everybody needs to pick up a weapon."

I believe that without the Jewish international press and propaganda incitement, peace among nations would be quickly achieved. Attempts to provoke war and tarnish our relationship with the United States are fueled by political and financial interests. If another world war were to occur, it would result in the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe. This is not just a struggle for German freedom and security, but a battle for the future of Europe and the entire civilized Western world. Translation: The speaker discusses the impact of Jewish international press and propaganda on peace efforts, as well as the potential consequences of another world war on the Jewish race in Europe. The conflict is portrayed as not just a German struggle, but a battle for the future of Europe and the civilized Western world.

Wir sind eine stark verschworene Gemeinschaft und wollen in Ruhe gelassen werden. Unser Vorteil ist unsere Friedensliebe, niemandem Leid zuzufügen. 1939 haben die Westmächte die Maske fallen lassen und Deutschland den Krieg erklärt. Trotz Versuchen und Entgegenkommen geben sie zu, dass Polen wahrscheinlich eingewilligt hätte, aber sie wollten den Krieg. Innere Gegner bestätigten dies. England wird den Kampf bekommen. Nachdem Bomben auf die Bevölkerung in Westfalen geworfen wurden, wartete ich 14 Tage, weil ich dachte, der Mann ist wahnsinnig. Er führt einen Kampf, bei dem nur ein Volk gewinnen wird. **Translation:** We are a strongly united community and want to be left alone. Our advantage is our love of peace, not to cause suffering to anyone. In 1939, the Western powers dropped the mask and declared war on Germany. Despite attempts and concessions, they admit that Poland would probably have agreed, but they wanted the war. Internal opponents confirmed this. England will get the fight. After bombs were dropped on the population in Westphalia, I waited 14 days because I thought the man was crazy. He is waging a battle in which only one nation will win.

We will fight on the seas, in the air, on the beaches, and in the streets. We will defend our island at any cost. We will never surrender.

The speaker believes the world misunderstands Germany, thinking it oppressed and easily manipulated. A vote on March 29th is not for the regime, but to demonstrate the nation's unified demand for equal rights and rejection of being treated as inferior. The speaker asserts that lasting European order requires equality among nations and that defaming the German population is insane. The speaker claims to seek Germany's equal participation in Europe and warns against further defamation. The speaker insists that the bond between leader and movement is strongest during crises and that Germany will stand united. The speaker states that Germany desires peace but will not abandon its claim to equality, dismissing the spirit of Versailles. The speaker calls for a revision of the outlook that denies Germany equal rights, offering cooperation if addressed decently, or else Germany will act alone. The speaker emphasizes the vote is to show the world that the entire German Volk rejects insulting demands and that the government is supported by the trust of the population, not by force. The speaker asks the German Volk to stand behind him with their faith.

Amelia introduces herself, saying she’s English and loves England. The other speaker responds with a set of personal preferences—fish and chips, a pint at the local pub, Shakespeare, Dickens, Tolkien, Lewis, Harry Potter, pork sausage, dogs, and fashion—and then declares “Haram. Haram,” followed by anti-immigrant and anti-Islamic statements. They express frustration that Brits are polite but unwilling to “commit cultural suicide,” condemning the Church of England and the BBC as “a bunch of queers and nonces.” They question how the country could move from Churchill to the current leadership, naming Sadiq Khan and London as not Afghanistan or Star Wars. They claim the government won’t protect schoolgirls from grooming gangs and that the police won’t help, accusing law enforcement of prioritizing other concerns, including confiscating garden tools and suppressing free speech. A police encounter is depicted where a woman is arrested for tweeting rudely. They insist curry is fine but argue Britain doesn’t need “2,000,000 Indians here” to cook it, and they assert there are “50 Islamic nations” and that Muslims don’t need to be on the island because they want to conquer it. They state the government dictates the way things must be, and ask if that’s right, addressed to “Robin Hood.” The speaker uses imagery of dragons threatening England, suggesting brave knights must rise to slay them, and questions whether British bloodlines with any bollocks were killed off in World Wars I and II. They declare English men’s country being taken from them, saying it doesn’t matter if you’re “Chav” or “posh”—everyone is in this together. They express concern about the future of the women of England—and imply that women in Iran and Afghanistan wouldn’t want this either. They reference ancestors who defeated the Spanish Armada, Napoleon, and the Nazis, implying resilience of English history. They ask if people can handle welfare tourists, asserting that history will record what actions are taken. The message ends with a call to “Get cracking, lads. Love, Amelia.”

**German Summary:** Ein Sprecher wurde im Bundestag beim Jugend und Parlament aufgefordert, seine Deutschlandflagge auszuziehen, da dies die Neutralität gefährde. Der Sprecher fragte daraufhin einen anderen Redner nach dessen Bewertung der Situation. Dieser antwortete, dass dies das Selbstbild vieler Leute widerspiegele, die sich selbst und Deutschland nicht akzeptieren könnten. Er fügte hinzu, dass dies nicht die Zukunft sei und man "a b" wählen solle, um dies zu ändern. **English Translation:** A speaker at the German Bundestag during a youth parliament event was asked to remove their German flag because it supposedly compromised neutrality. The speaker then asked another speaker for their assessment of the situation. The second speaker responded that this reflects the self-image of many people who cannot accept themselves or Germany. They added that this is not the future and that people should vote "a b" to change it.

At the start of the war, we weren't in a good position and didn't have the upper hand. Now, things are different; we're gaining leverage. But you're playing a dangerous game, gambling with the lives of millions and risking World War Three. Your actions are disrespectful to this country. I've given more than many suggested, and yet, there hasn't been a single thank you, not even once.

For fifteen years there has been only talk, so action is required. The speaker states they have taken action, working for fourteen years on an instrument, and their strength is tied to the strength of their Volk. They believe miracles come from the power of the Volk, and they want to mobilize its best efforts. The speaker claims to belong exclusively to the German Volk and everything they have undertaken has been for the Volk. They stand up for the German peasant because the peasant is the foundation of German power. The speaker claims to be the only statesman in the world without a bank account, stocks, or shares, and wants their Volk to be strong to survive. They claim to have not set foot on foreign territory, robbed any nation, broken into a house, or stolen anything. The speaker believes only the German Volk can judge them in German matters, not an international council. They ask the German Volk to look at the greatness of the last three years and be proud, stating they have become a marvelous, decent, hard-working, and energetic folk capable of accomplishing anything. The speaker subordinates themself only to the German Volk, asking them to judge their work.

Herr Chatschil claimed to have destroyed 50% of U-boats, but later reduced the number to 30% and then 10%. He criticized attacks on civilians in England and vowed to continue fighting until a clear decision is made. He emphasized the need for peace and expressed a desire to work for the benefit of the German people. The sacrifices of those who died for the movement were praised, and a commitment to rectify past shame in German history was highlighted. Translation: Herr Chatschil claimed to have destroyed 50% of U-boats, but later reduced the number to 30% and then 10%. He criticized attacks on civilians in England and vowed to continue fighting until a clear decision is made. He emphasized the need for peace and expressed a desire to work for the benefit of the German people. The sacrifices of those who died for the movement were praised, and a commitment to rectify past shame in German history was highlighted.

**German Summary:** Laut dem Sprecher wird der Völkerstreit von einer kleinen, wurzellosen, internationalen Clique gefördert. Diese Clique hetzt die Völker gegeneinander auf und wünscht keine Ruhe. Diese Leute seien überall und nirgends zu Hause, ohne festen Boden. Sie könnten in Berlin, Brüssel, Paris, Prag, Rendine oder London leben und sich überall zu Hause fühlen. Sie seien die einzigen internationalen Elemente, da sie überall ihre Geschäfte betreiben könnten. **English Summary:** According to the speaker, conflict between peoples is fueled by a small, rootless, international clique. This clique incites nations against each other and does not want them to find peace. These people are said to be at home everywhere and nowhere, without a firm foundation. They could live in Berlin, Brussels, Paris, Prague, Rendine, or London and feel at home everywhere. They are described as the only truly international elements because they can conduct their business anywhere.

The speaker claims to have solved internal problems without harming others, seeking no glory through violence. They assert Germany has not caused suffering, taken anything unjustly, or threatened anyone, repeatedly offering friendship. Despite this, they allege a smear campaign persists, falsely claiming Germany will invade Austria, fueled by agitators who desire no peace. These agitators are identified as a small, international clique that thrives on stirring up mistrust, known from within Germany itself. The speaker praises Germany's unified leadership and the growing consideration among its people, expressing pride in being their Fuhrer. They describe being moved by the sight of German workers and believe other nations, if they saw this peaceful, laboring folk, would reject the agitators and understand Germany's role as a guarantor of European order and human culture. The speech concludes with a call to pledge dedication to the German Volk and Reich.

We are at a turning point, with new ideas emerging. Victors and vanquished alike sense something is awry, with reason replaced by hatred and fear. A new order is needed, especially in Europe, based on the reality of diverse peoples and guided by reason and mutual understanding. Versailles is not the answer. Germany strives for this new order, one of equal rights and obligations. The restoration of Germany's sovereignty should not be intolerable to others. Germany does not dictate what other nations do within their borders. The speaker believes a basic principle for understanding is that each nation allows others to live as they wish. Germany makes no demands but rejects demands on its own sovereignty. This is the opinion of 67 million Germans, not just one man. The speaker wants 25 years of peace for Europe, not gestures, and asks if other statesmen's people share this view. The speaker has asked the German folk if they share his view and has surrendered himself to their judgment.

Action was needed in 1933, requiring one leadership, will, and resolve. Germany has become united and stronger, with a different spirit and will. The old Germany no longer exists. The German folk remained honest, even when its representatives dragged it through the mud. The speaker pledges allegiance to the right of a folk to live with equal rights and obligations and stands for the nation's right to live, honor, freedom, and vital interests. Those who deny Germany honor and equality do not want peace. For three years, the speaker has fought for German equality. Each generation must correct past wrongs. The speaker believes no folk wants to oppress or humiliate another. The speaker thanks Providence for choosing him to fight for Germany. Unreasonable demands will be rejected. The speaker has announced a program for international peace for a quarter of a century and calls on Germany to show the world on March 29 that this reflects its will.

The summary presents a narrative of post-World War I consequences and the asserted motivations behind Germany’s behavior, focusing on the Versailles Treaty and its aftermath. It claims that the Versailles Treaty was imposed due to internal unrest caused by “Jewish communists,” and that Germany, despite not starting the war, lost it. It states that all major countries aimed to start a war for advancement of power, and it lists German losses: 1.8 million soldiers died and 4.2 million were wounded. The account describes the reparations and postwar constraints as punitive. It notes that to force Germany to accept the terms, the British Navy conducted a blockade that “starved to death 750,000 German civilians.” The conditions of the treaty are itemized: 13% of German territory with 7,300,000 Germans living there; reparations totaling 132,000,000,000 Reichsmarks (with the exchange rate given as one mark equal to 50 cents); loss of 67% of zinc production and 75% of iron ore; decrements in agricultural and industrial capacity including 1,000,000 cattle, 7,500 locomotives, 200,000 freight cars; removal of the army, navy, merchant ships, and colonies. The text asserts that Britain threatened to extend the blockade and invade if terms were not accepted. The narrative then states that France invaded the Ruhr region in 1923, noting that the Ruhr produced 80% of Germany’s coal and steel. It uses a metaphor—“Imagine a man who shoots you in the leg and then tells you to run a marathon and if you can't you'll get shot again”—to describe the relationship between the Allies and Germany after World War I. It contends that Germany could not physically fulfill the demands. The passage argues that the situation was not about fair reparations but about slavery and presents Germany as facing two choices: accept slavery or rise to power. It claims Germany understood its enemy was acting in its power interests, not democracy, human rights, or peace. Consequently, Germany decided to pursue its own power interests. In sum, the text presents a viewpoint that attributes the harsh postwar settlement to punitive Allied aims rooted in power rather than justice, asserts the blockade and territorial losses were intolerable pressures, and frames Germany’s subsequent stance as a calculated response to an adversary acting in self-interest, culminating in a claim that Germany chose to pursue power as an alternative to “slavery.”

**Spanish Summary:** El orador insta a no rendirse, no acobardarse, no huir, sino perseverar y conquistar, mirando al frente para ganar. Declara que "este día" es para los locos, los inadaptados, los rebeldes, los alborotadores y aquellos que no encajan. **English Translation:** The speaker urges listeners not to give up, not to be intimidated, not to flee, but to persevere and conquer, looking ahead to win. They declare that "this day" is for the crazy ones, the misfit, the rebels, the troublemakers, and those who don't fit in.

Herr Chatschil claimed U-boats were destroyed, but now admits they are increasing. He discusses fighting against civilians in England, expressing determination to continue the battle until a clear decision is made. He emphasizes the need for peace and denounces war for material interests. He praises those who sacrificed for Germany and vows to rectify past shame in the nation's history. Translation: Mr. Chatschil initially claimed U-boats were destroyed, but now acknowledges their increase. He discusses fighting against civilians in England and expresses determination to continue the battle until a clear decision is made. He emphasizes the need for peace and denounces war for material interests. He praises those who sacrificed for Germany and vows to rectify past shame in the nation's history.

Friends, everything is waiting, but governments, money, press, and television are against us. Despite this, we shouldn't despair. In European history, small bands of men came together with resolution, saying Europe shall live, and threw back the hordes. It can happen again. If we bring together enough people in Britain and other European countries, we can meet the dark forces threatening our European light. We began in Venice to bring together the best Europeans to decide on a policy to act together. Willpower, endurance, faith, and belief overcome all. The decisions of Britain are the greatest hindrance. If the British people decided to do these things, it would awaken hope throughout Europe. We must bring Britain into this immense concern, which is going to be Europe and is going to save mankind. Live in that sense of history and destiny. Never has mankind been confronted with such possibilities, with such choices of disaster or of greater heights and greater glories. Live in the sense that you are Englishmen, that you are European, and that you have the will, spirit, faith, and belief to lead generations to look back at you with pride.

Speaker 1 asserts that Hitler was the aggressor of World War II, beginning the war by driving east with the intention of destroying communist Russia. He states that Britain intervened and declared war to prevent Hitler from achieving that objective, and as a result, Britain “today” has to maneuver back and forth between America and Russia. He claims that Britain has “lost the empire,” that 25,000,000 Europeans were killed, and that he is proud to have done his utmost to stop what he describes as a suicidal war that “has destroyed Great Britain.” Speaker 0 acknowledges this sequence and asks for the precise words spoken in 1939, requesting to know what Speaker 1 claimed at that time, specifically referencing the assertion that the conflict was “simply a Jewish financier's quarrel.”