reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"It goes to the heart of there being two Americas. One America for the rich and powerful." "What force is there? What corrupt forces are there that can stranglehold the United States government from preventing Epstein from abusing young girls, from preventing a full disclosure of what Epstein was doing, from preventing the American public from learning about other rich and powerful men who raped and abused these young girls." "They're forgotten Americans in this country." "There are documents there because the victim's lawyers have seen those documents." "We've released 33,000 documents." "97% of already is in the public domain." "The president could say release the files." "This is a moral test." "We need two more Republican votes."

I'm just tired of the Epstein conversation. These powerful people implicated in these files will never let them be released. I'm putting the Epstein files in the same category as the JFK files, things the American people will never see because the people involved are still in control. It's amazing how anything implicating Israel is never declassified. Look at JFK's assassination and his arguments with Israel's Prime Minister, Ben Gurion. JFK demanded AIPAC register as foreign agents, then he was shot, and we can't see those files either. With Epstein's apparent Mossad connections, it becomes too complicated to release files. Now, we're told phase one is coming, but they need to blackout victims' names. 250 names? I could do that in an hour. I'm just tired of the political back and forth and pretending. As soon as Israel might be involved, transparency goes out the window. Phase one was a nothing burger.

I understand the concern about the hypocrisy of feminist groups who remain silent on the atrocities committed by Hamas, while being vocal about other issues. I want to see a list of these feminists and know if they have condemned Hamas for the rapes and murders. I am glad that the papers have been released, as I have always maintained my innocence. However, I worry that some documents may have been withheld, and I want everything to be made public, including evidence that may affect the credibility of the accusers and the accused. We should not judge based on accusations alone, but rather on the evidence presented.

Speaker 0 discusses the nature of the allegations surrounding Epstein and the broader “pedo” discourse. They begin by asking whether the situation is essentially pedophilia, noting a reluctance to voice this directly but concluding that they feel compelled to say it. They state: “This whole pedo thing, it's like, isn't it really pedophilia? I don't wanna be the one that has to say it, but I guess I'm being forced to say it.” They then attempt to distinguish between what some describe as trafficking and what they consider the case to be, saying: “It's not really pedophilia, okay? They weren't trafficking five year olds, it was like they were technically not legal. Big difference in my opinion.” They acknowledge this as a controversial perspective and proceed to articulate a position: “I know that's a controversial take, but that's not really the issue there, Okay? The issue is not that they were barely legal teens, which is what it is. It's horrendous, it's awful, it's pedophilia.” The speaker then shifts the topic away from the legality of the ages to a related, more conspiratorial claim, emphasizing that the core issue, in their view, lies in an alleged association between Epstein and a broader espionage context. They insist: “Okay, relax. No, the issue is that Epstein is a Jewish spy probably working with Israel.” They frame Epstein as being connected to Israeli intelligence, presenting this as the central dilemma rather than the specifics of the sexual exploitation allegations. Throughout, Speaker 0 presents a sequence of framed assertions: first, a provocative reframing of the ethical category involved (from illegal but not strictly illegal acts to pedophilia), then a qualitative judgment about the severity and nature of the acts themselves, and finally a shift to a geopolitical and intelligence-related conspiracy claim about Epstein’s possible affiliation with Jewish identity and Israeli intelligence. The speaker explicitly acknowledges the controversial nature of their viewpoint but maintains that the primary concern is not the legal characterization of the victims’ ages but the asserted espionage connection. No further context, evidence, or qualifiers are provided in the excerpt, and the speaker does not offer evidence supporting the espionage claim within this transcript. The emphasis remains on contrasting opinions about how to categorize the behavior, followed by a bold assertion regarding Epstein’s alleged role as a Jewish spy associated with Israel.

The discussion centers on a disturbing Epstein-related document dump from the DOJ, focusing on a diary kept by a girl who was 16 at the time of the abuse. The speakers emphasize the diary as a direct, named account written by the girl, and note that the FBI interpreted her coded entries. They describe the girl as having Mosaic Down syndrome and autism, with the diary mentioning both conditions and the way she was treated by Epstein and his associates. Key details highlighted: - The girl’s background: autism and Mosaic Down syndrome; she writes about autism in the diary and notes how Spirit Airlines was praised for accommodating autistic people. - Targeting and vulnerability: she was considered easier to exploit due to her condition and described as beautiful, with mentions of blonde hair and blue eyes, described in terms akin to a porcelain doll. - Pregnancy and abortion: the diary recounts pregnancies and instances of forced abortions or births, with references to a test showing pregnancy (“two pink lines”) and to being treated as property or an incubator. - Direct quotes from the diary: she expresses a desire to die, references Ghislain Maxwell as someone who sometimes protects her and sometimes does not, and states, “I am nothing but your property and incubator” and “my heart belonged to her.” - A specific segment about a baby: she writes about being able to hold and feed a baby for ten to fifteen minutes before the baby was taken away, and she describes the baby as hers and expresses distress. - Attempts to obtain help: she repeatedly begs to be released from torture and to be saved. Names and individuals mentioned in the diary: - Ghislain Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell) is referenced repeatedly as someone who “protects” her at times and is connected to the control she experiences. - Jean-Luc Brunel is named in the diary with a derogatory description and speculation about his motives; the diary notes his suicide in prison. Other figures discussed in relation to the diary: - Leon Black: the diary includes coded references to “Stopped Dead” and mentions meeting Black in New York City in 2000 as Epstein’s “special friend.” The text discusses public reporting (Newsweek, 2023) about allegations against Black, who reportedly paid Epstein $158 million for financial advice between 2012 and 2017, after Epstein’s conviction. The diary entry describes an incident where Black allegedly bit and assaulted the girl, with “blood all over Jeffrey’s carpet,” and Black’s supposed disdain, saying, “Leon can go F himself.” The discussion notes Black’s later withdrawal from Apollo and questions the plausibility of a figure paying that amount for financial advice. - The diary also references Epstein’s associates and a pattern of moving the victim between powerful people. Context and meta-commentary: - The speakers acknowledge that the case details are not proven in court and urge caution about drawing definitive conclusions from diary entries and online reports. They emphasize that some accounts appear credible as direct Epstein victims, while others remain unverified or disputed. - They criticize media and government handling of the Epstein case, suggesting there were long-standing cover-ups and implying involvement of intelligence or state actors, though they reiterate that conclusions about guilt or innocence should await legal proceedings. - They note that the DOJ’s redactions in the Epstein files did not protect the victims’ names as promised, while some alleged predators remained less protected, and they reference a torture video mentioned in emails to Epstein, asking who sent it and what happened to that person. - The conversation ends with broader criticisms of political leadership and the media, arguing that the organization behind the trafficking was extensive and that coverage often centers on famous individuals rather than the organizers and victims.

Speaker 0: "We're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan?" Speaker 1: "That's not right. Wrong headed." He says he faced blowback after saying, "Mossad, possibilities with Epstein," a comment he stands by, and that he "reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer." He writes, "He says, I think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true." "I think all these things should be explored." "It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein." He finishes, "But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you antisemitic."

It's incredible how some people either don't think or just want to hate me. Usually, when a famous person faces these accusations, many victims appear. Name anyone, and you'll find hundreds of victims, new lawsuits, and countless stories. But here I am, three and a half years into this, with the most media spin ever, and not a single girl has come forward. Every girl they contact says I'm nice. They like me, even defend me. No one's against me.

I understand the concern about the silence of certain feminist groups regarding the Hamas' crimes against Jewish girls. The speaker questions the hypocrisy of the Me Too movement and calls for a list of feminists who have condemned Hamas. They express satisfaction that the papers have been released and emphasize the importance of transparency, hoping that all documents, including those that challenge the credibility of accusers and accused, will be made public for people to form their own judgments.

Republicans are reminded that not all Jewish people support Israel, and it is important not to express hatred towards all Jews. The speaker discusses the ties between Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Israel, highlighting connections to Mossad and various individuals. They mention the influence of Israel on discussions about Epstein and claim that Israel controls the platforms where Epstein is discussed. The speaker also brings up the financial ties between Israel and US politicians, including the president and the Clintons. They criticize the Israeli offensive against Palestine and suggest that Israel is responsible for a large human trafficking ring. The speaker questions the support for Israel and argues that calling out a genocide is not anti-Semitic. They mention the cognitive dissonance on the internet and briefly mention TikTok's commitment to freedom of speech.

So, the Epstein files aren't online yet. Instead, the White House gave binders of the first disclosure phase to mainstream conservative influencers. Hopefully, the PDFs will be available soon. My concern is with some of the chosen influencers, particularly the staunchly pro-Israel ones. Considering Epstein's ties to Israel, it's questionable to have them control the documents. Their online presence seems to heavily favor Israeli narratives. More importantly, remember that access is a form of control in politics. These influencers now have access to the administration, which may compromise their ability to report critically and unbiasedly. While I'm staying optimistic, I hope everyone involved, regardless of their perspectives, reports the facts honestly and ethically.

The Jeffrey Epstein files are about to be released, and the scale of what happened is far worse than anyone realized with well over 200 victims. I believe the information will be released today. Promises made, promises kept. This case was vetted, went through trial, had testimony, and was prosecuted the right way. In Epstein's case, it is incredibly disturbing. We have flight logs, information, and names that will come out. It's shocking how so many individuals were hidden, kept secret, and not held accountable. Accountability is important. We've seen many investigations, but there's a general frustration because we only take it halfway. Now there will be accountability. By releasing information from these files, we are likely to see criminal actions being taken. It would be negligent for us not to hold individuals who are rapists accountable.

Jeffrey Epstein's wealth and connections raise questions about who he was working for, possibly foreign intelligence services. It's acceptable to ask if he worked for a foreign government, such as Israel, without it being considered hateful or anti-Semitic. Criticizing a government's actions is a right of citizenship, not an act of disloyalty. Many in Washington believe Epstein had connections to Mossad and ran a blackmail operation for a foreign government. The speaker questions why this can't be openly discussed. The speaker believes avoiding the topic creates resentment and hate. The Israeli government should be asked directly if they were involved, and their refusal to answer is unacceptable. As long as the U.S. provides financial aid, citizens have a right to know if crimes were committed on U.S. soil.

"We're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan?" "That's not right. Wrong headed." "I So got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand." "I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer." "He says, I think he would have told me." "He didn't say he had any of those connections." "I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true." "It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein." "But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you antisemitic."

Powerful Epstein clients like Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, and Reid Hoffman, may have been worried about the list coming out. It's frustrating that the list isn't being released. Releasing insignificant information is pointless. The public will be frustrated if no one is prosecuted, especially since Ghislaine Maxwell is in jail for sex trafficking. It's insane not to name the clients. It's stunning they've held it back so long. Many things are common knowledge, but we lack proof. When Epstein's place was raided, there must have been a mountain of evidence. Who took possession of it? Where are the tapes? We need tech-savvy people. When they raided his home and the island, they must have gotten everything. If it wasn't there, where is it? It has to be uploaded somewhere, with a chain of custody and a mountain of evidence.

The Jeffrey Epstein files are about to be released. Attorney General Pam Bondi says the scale is far worse than anyone realized, with potentially 250 victims. The release is imminent, possibly today. I just saw Pam and Cash in the White House. I haven't seen the files yet, but they are coming out in portions, so patience is key. This case was vetted, tried, and prosecuted correctly. The information in these files, including flight logs and names, will be shocking because so many individuals were hidden and not held accountable. Accountability is crucial. We've seen many investigations that fall short. With Cash and Pam, I believe there will finally be accountability. Ghislaine Maxwell is the only person imprisoned so far. Releasing these files will likely lead to further criminal actions. We must hold rapists accountable and try them in court. Hiding lists to protect political friends is unacceptable.

If the Epstein files reveal Israel's prime role in a blackmail ring involving child sex trafficking, would you release them? Exposing this could halt aid money and redefine our view of Israel, possibly seeing them as our greatest threat, surpassing even the Soviet Union's subversion during the Cold War. The core question is whether Cash Patel and Pam Bondi will risk exposing a foreign nation's espionage, even if it implicates a supposed ally. I'm addressing the question about whether to release these files head-on. I am not anti-semitic, I judge people individually. Publicly available information and logic point to Jeffrey Epstein working for Israel, supported by Zionist Jewish billionaires who have devoted their lives to furthering Israeli interests.

The speaker discusses various connections between Jeffrey Epstein, Israel, and influential individuals. They mention Epstein's ties to Mossad, Ghislaine Maxwell's connections to Israel, and the involvement of Jewish individuals in Epstein's circle. The speaker emphasizes that not all Jewish people support Israel's actions and condemns any hatred towards all Jews. They also mention the influence of Israel on discussions about Epstein and the financial support received by US politicians from Israel. The speaker raises questions about the motivations behind the recent escalation of violence between Israel and Palestine and criticizes the support for Israel despite allegations of human trafficking and the killing of innocent civilians. They urge people to think critically and not blindly follow their party's beliefs.

I understand the concern about ties to Jeffrey Epstein, but where are radical feminists when it comes to Hamas' crimes against Jewish girls? The hypocrisy of the Me Too movement is evident in their silence on this issue. I want a list of feminists who condemned Hamas for their rapes and murders, and how many stayed silent or even supported them. Let's consider this context.

I understand the concerns about the hypocrisy of certain feminist groups who remain silent on the issue of Hamas' abuse of young Jewish girls. I believe it is important to reveal the names of these feminists and assess their stance on Hamas' actions. I am glad that the papers have been released, as I have always maintained my innocence. However, I worry that some documents may have been withheld, and I urge for the release of all documents to ensure a fair judgment by the public.

Speaker 0 addresses the topic of the Epstein situation, expressing a controversial viewpoint about labeling the matter. They begin by saying, "This whole pedo thing, it's like, isn't it really pedophilia? I don't wanna be the one that has to say it, but I guess I'm being forced to say it." They then attempt to clarify their stance by asserting, "It's not really pedophilia, okay? They weren't trafficking five year olds, it was like they were technically not legal. Big difference in my opinion." The speaker acknowledges that this interpretation is controversial, adding, "I know that's a controversial take, but that's not really the issue there, Okay, the issue is not that they were barely legal teens, which is what it is." They continue to differentiate between the legality and the ethical horror, insisting, "It's horrendous, it's awful, it's pedophilia, okay." However, despite labeling it pedophilia, they pivot to a different focal point, stating, "No, the issue is that Epstein is a Jewish spy probably working with Israel." The speaker characterizes Epstein as being "probably working with Israel" and frames this as the underlying dilemma. They conclude by reiterating their position, "He's working with Israeli intelligence," emphasizing that this supposed affiliation constitutes the core of the dilemma discussed.

Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of Intel Services, likely not American, and it's valid to question on whose behalf he operated. How did he go from a math teacher to owning multiple airplanes, a private island, and a large Manhattan house without a college degree? Epstein had direct connections to a foreign government, and while people avoid naming Israel, there's nothing wrong, hateful, antisemitic, or anti-Israel about asking if he worked for Mossad, running a blackmail operation. Everyone in Washington D.C. suspects this, but feels unable to voice it. The speaker believes open discussion is better than suppressed resentment and hate. The question of whether this happened has been posed to the Israeli government, who declined to answer. The speaker argues that as long as the U.S. sends Israel money, the U.S. has a right to know if Israel committed crimes on U.S. soil.

This woman abused children. I was abused by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell for over ten years. Ghislaine Maxwell was present for some of my abuse at the hand of Jeffrey Epstein. She was present. She was complicit. She was enabling. And it's one of my worst nightmares that she not only be transferred, but at the possibility that's very much going around that she might be pardoned. My first trip to The Palm Beach residence, I drove there from the airport with Gilen Maxwell, and they Jeffrey and Gilen were always very boastful about their friends, This is not okay, guys. This is not okay.

Transparency is justice. Release the files and the secrecy and stand with us in declaring that no one, no billionaires, no politicians, not world leaders is above the law. Several of us Epstein survivors have been discussing creating our own list of names. We know the names. Many of us were abused by them. Now together as survivors, we will confidentially compile the names we all know were regularly in the Epstein world, and it will be done by survivors and for survivors. No one else is involved. Stay tuned for more details on this. Because history is watching, and so are the women who will come after us. That's right. Thank you. Thank you.

I understand the concern about the hypocrisy of feminist groups and their silence on Hamas atrocities compared to their strong stance against Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker questions how many feminists have condemned Hamas for the rapes and murders committed. They express satisfaction that the released papers have vindicated them and express a desire for all documents, including those that challenge the credibility of accusers and accused, to be made public. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not assuming guilt based on accusations alone, but rather on evidence.

The Jeffrey Epstein files are about to be released, and the scale is far worse than anyone realized, potentially involving well over 200 victims. I saw Pam and Cash in the White House, and I know this information is coming out today. We are going to keep promises that were made. This case was vetted, went through trial, and was prosecuted correctly. The flight logs and names that will come out are incredibly disturbing. It's shocking how many individuals were hidden and not held accountable. I believe in accountability. It's time to go through the process. I won't say they're guilty until their time in court. There's been a general frustration with accountability in this country, but with Cash and Pam, there will be accountability. It would be negligent not to hold these individuals accountable. We have to try these rapists.