reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of action and filibustering at a meeting. They mention filing a federal lawsuit against woke indoctrination and threaten to sue if their child is taught CRT or SEL. They advocate for school choice and reject the idea of teaching sexual expression in the classroom. They criticize teachers for lying and leaving their profession due to issues like supervising bathrooms. They argue against treating children as emotional support animals and assert their role as a mother. The speaker vows to fight against these issues.

Speaker says a rising tide of racial hatred against white people and a shift from 'not seeing color' to 'you must see color.' They claim a 'perverse ideology' teaches that 'everything, every societal ill, is the fault of white people' and that 'we're being taught' a double standard where negative experiences are attributed to whiteness. They present TikTok clips against whites: 'You have a token white and you're hanging out with your friend group of color, you need to ask permission,' 'don't have babies,' and 'white privilege.' They contend that 'on one side of the political aisle, people of color actually have greater power than white people,' citing Minneapolis contract, New York COVID treatment policy, Cornell banning whites from rock climbing, and BIPOC events. They insist 'You are not an oppressor, period' and challenge the idea that 'racism is prejudice plus power.' They warn of demographic shift and urge 'Do better.'

In schools, there's pressure to learn about Islam instead of English culture and beliefs. The speaker is proud to be English, but wasn't taught about the Bill of Rights or the Battle of Agincourt. The speaker says school taught about Islam and Mohammed's ideologies, barely covering Christianity. When the speaker tried to discuss negative aspects of Mohammed, they were suspended for being racist. The speaker claims to have been questioning an ideology, not being racist, and believes free speech is being suppressed. The speaker says they were suspended for discussing the wrongs of Islam, because schools only portray it as peaceful, which the speaker disputes based on their book.

In this video, the speaker shares a personal story about an incident at a school during the 2020 presidential election. They were with a blind friend who supports Trump when a group of Black Lives Matter activists started chanting and verbally attacking them. The speaker tried to get help from the police, but nothing was done. They also mention filing a complaint about the incident but never received a response. The speaker brings up other complaints they have made, including one about not receiving funding for a political campaign. They express frustration with the lack of action and mention sending the video to a specific email address.

In this video, a woman shares her experience of speaking out against the new sexual education curriculum in the Benicia Unified School District. After expressing her disagreement at a school board meeting, she faced backlash from progressive groups who labeled her as anti-equity, anti-trans, and a homophobe. They contacted her employer, Compass, demanding her termination, and the company complied. She highlights the irony of being silenced in a town that claims to value diversity and inclusion. She questions whether Benicia is a place where those who disagree are financially ruined and canceled. The woman urges for true inclusivity and tolerance, emphasizing the importance of allowing diverse opinions. She shares her story on the website cancelledinbenisha.com.

Teachers are leaving not because of pay, but because of the challenges they face. The speaker, a band director, shares recent incidents of assault, property damage, and disruptive behavior in their classroom. They emphasize that these issues are not limited to their school or a lack of discipline measures. The problem lies in emotional dysregulation, with students disregarding consequences and prioritizing entertainment. The speaker acknowledges their use of technology but believes some students have lost motivation. Despite their initial excitement to make a difference, the speaker feels overwhelmed and exhausted. They express frustration with a failing system that is not supporting teachers or students.

In schools, they pressure us to learn about Islam and other cultures, but I want to learn about my own culture and beliefs. I'm proud to be English. They don't teach us about the Bill of Rights or our own history. In school, they were teaching us about Islam, about Prophet Mohammed, and all their ideologies. They barely mention Christianity. They don't tell you the negative aspects. When I tried to question it, I would get in trouble and even suspended from school for being "racist." I was just questioning an ideology that, in my opinion, isn't right. They're trying to take away my free speech at school and silence me for discussing the wrongs of Islam. They only say Islam is a peaceful religion, but their book says otherwise.

The speaker states that nine months ago, they would have considered making "pro white content" insane, as white pride is associated with evil and hate. They believe white people are uniquely taught to hate themselves and are blamed for all atrocities. The speaker claims white people are the only ones taught to be color blind and are constantly subjected to diversity initiatives. They assert that white people are a global minority being replaced in their own countries, and the speaker has "had enough."

I attended UCLA in 2016 when Trump was elected. During midterms, professors offered students time off to "heal" from the election. In a mandatory discussion class, everyone was emotional, and when asked how I was coping, I shared that I voted for Trump and believed it would be a good four years. I was then kicked out for being a "threat" to my classmates' safety. This experience made me realize the need to speak out against such intolerance. I recently started posting on TikTok and encourage others to do the same. I don’t hate anyone, but I’m unfairly labeled with negative terms that don’t reflect who I am. It's important to stand up and be heard.

Speaker says they had to block all their friends because of different political beliefs, though they believed these were the people they would live with after college and stay in touch—the people who saved their life on multiple occasions. They dropped out of school for them and started homeschooling because of them; in a small school, they don’t know how to face them, and these people are their life. They don’t know how to avoid them and feel they might be to blame for blowing up the relationships; everything they hear makes them feel like such a shit person, and they can’t have that in their life anymore. They used to not respect themselves to cut people out for this, but now they do; they respect themselves enough to not want to feel like this. God, I'm probably gonna delete this because this is so fucking embarrassing crying on camera.

The speaker confronts the audience, claiming to have proof and challenging them to acknowledge it. They accuse the audience of emotionally and mentally abusing children by teaching them communist values. The speaker vows to continue fighting against this and threatens legal action. They argue that schools should not teach certain topics and should respect their religious beliefs. The speaker also mentions the children of police officers and claims that their voices are being silenced. They question the definition of racism and challenge others' assumptions about their own race.

My children now attend private school because we decided to leave LCPS. We made this choice because we disagreed with the political agenda of the superintendent and school board, led by Williams Ziegler. In spring 2020, my 6-year-old asked me if she was born evil because she learned in a history lesson at school that being white meant being evil.

If you live in California, pull your kids out of public school because it's unfixable and will worsen. In one district, dozens of girls reported being assaulted on campus. The board of education members belong to Project Indivisible, so change is unlikely. The speaker worked for the district for two years and witnessed unbelievable things. After speaking out at board and city council meetings and meeting with the district office, the speaker was stalked, harassed, and chased off the road. The speaker advises, "These are not seeing people you're dealing with. Pull your kids out."

This video highlights various instances where professors and educators express controversial views about white people. It includes statements advocating for the killing of white people, promoting white guilt, and demonizing white children. The video also mentions cases where schools are penalized for having a high white student population and incidents of racial tension in classrooms. It concludes with a report on a teacher who took students to Antifa protests without permission. Additionally, it mentions a student walkout in New York due to the perceived overrepresentation of white students.

A student says schools pressure them to learn about Islam instead of their own culture and beliefs, and that they are proud to be English. They claim they weren't taught about the Pill of Franks or the Battle of Hajin Court. The student says they were taught about Islam, Prophet Mohammed, and Islamic ideologies, but Christianity was barely covered. They allege that when they tried to speak up and say something, they were suspended from school for being racist. They state they were just questioning.

In schools, there's pressure to learn about Islam instead of English culture and beliefs. The speaker is proud to be English, but wasn't taught about the Bill of Rights or the Battle of Agincourt. School lessons covered Islam and Mohammed, but barely touched on Christianity. The speaker claims that when they tried to discuss negative aspects of Mohammed, such as being a warlord who brutally murdered people, they were suspended for being racist. The speaker states they were questioning an ideology, which they believe is not the right one. They feel their free speech is being suppressed and that they were suspended for discussing the wrongs of Islam. They believe schools only portray Islam as peaceful, which they disagree with based on their interpretation of its religious text.

The speaker discusses how the world is divided into oppressors (white people) and victims (BIPOC). They argue that Jews, being considered white, are seen as oppressors while Palestinians are seen as victims. This oversimplification ignores the complexity of the conflict and the responsibility to educate. The second speaker adds that this viewpoint is being enforced in many institutions, and suggesting alternative perspectives can lead to being labeled as a pariah. They chose to go public to address unprofessional behavior in the learning environment, despite the risks. This issue is not limited to California but is happening nationwide.

The speaker expresses confusion about why public meetings spend so much time praising the educational system and defending against hurtful words. They argue that the main goal of education should be to prepare children for productive careers and not to serve as a counseling or self-help session. They believe that adults, not children, should lead and make decisions. The speaker criticizes the focus on minority groups, stating that less than 5% of the population identifies as LGBTQ. They emphasize the importance of democracy and majority beliefs. The speaker questions the celebration of graduations when many students fail their tests and highlights concerns about mental health crises among children. They argue that discussing certain topics with children causes emotional, intellectual, and moral distress, leading to anxiety and depression. The speaker advocates for allowing children to enjoy their innocence and childhood, focusing on reading, writing, and critical thinking skills. They request protection for children who fear God.

The speaker expresses concern about government overreach in education, citing critical race theory, critical gender theory, and transgender policies in schools. They claim schools are hiding gender transitions from parents via parental secrecy policies. The speaker questions the requirement to register children with schools and potentially disclose parental teaching methods. They worry about parents teaching creationism or the belief that life begins at conception being targeted. The speaker does not trust the Illinois governor and state government, believing these policies will be weaponized against those with differing beliefs, similar to how adoption has allegedly been restricted for some Christians.

A lifelong liberal and former Levi's brand president recounts her experience advocating for schools to reopen during COVID-19 lockdowns. Despite holding a prominent position and identifying with the company's liberal values, her views on school closures were met with resistance. She believed school closures harmed children, especially low-income students, and saw the situation as hypocritical given the focus on equality at the time. Her advocacy included social media posts, rallies, and op-eds, which led to repeated warnings from her employer. She was told her views were seen as representing the company, even though she felt she was speaking as a concerned parent. Advocates for open schools were labeled racist, with the rationale that school closures protected disproportionately Black and Brown children. Despite believing in the principles of equality, she realized that these principles were not being upheld. She thought her reasonable arguments and data would eventually convince others, but she ultimately lost her job.

People who used to be considered polite and smart are now labeled as far-right for upholding traditional values. Being labeled as racist is the new norm, even for those who once stood for equality. The focus has shifted from character to identity, leading to accusations of racism for questioning the status quo. Mental health issues are prevalent, with dyslexia, dyspraxia, bulimia, OCD, bipolar disorder, and anxiety being mentioned. The speaker expresses concern about what will come next, implying a sense of uncertainty and fear. The mention of pedophilia in a derogatory manner concludes the video.

The speaker claims the person in charge is surrounded by people who know nothing about education and want to focus on bureaucracy and cutting funds. They state that education should be about children, broadband access in schools, pedagogy research, and the Department of Education's civil rights department, which prevents segregation, referencing Ruby Bridges. The speaker believes we are returning to a time where segregation is possible. They acknowledge that curriculums are decided locally, but that the person in charge is "muddying the waters."

A teacher allegedly dedicated three days a week to LGBTQ curriculum for eight-year-olds. The speaker questions whether all students are excelling in core subjects to justify this time allocation. The speaker believes sexuality and nudity are inappropriate topics for this age group. The teacher allegedly disregarded a parent's concerns and sought ways to continue the lessons behind the parent's back. The speaker asserts that all children matter and objects to these subjects being taught to eight-year-olds.

The class is asked simple math questions, but students respond with unrelated answers like "multiculturalism" and "gender equality." The teacher is frustrated as students prioritize feelings over facts, leading to a debate on freedom of speech and offense. The teacher emphasizes the importance of not offending others over expressing opinions. Students argue that feelings are more important than facts, causing tension in the classroom. The teacher struggles to maintain order and focus on the subject at hand.

Upon returning from family leave, the speaker was surprised by the overt political environment at the university, particularly regarding DEI. Professors were upset that the university president wouldn't publicly support DEI efforts due to fear of losing funding, despite encouraging them privately. The speaker notes the psychology group was the most involved in DEI-related activities, including teaching critical race theory. The speaker believes DEI is used as a weapon, particularly through Title IX, to control thoughts and words. They cite instances where addressing a class as "you guys" or "ladies" was considered inappropriate or even sexual harassment. The speaker concludes that DEI is not about diversity, equity, or inclusion, but rather a tool for thought and speech control.