reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The US possesses advanced weaponry, possibly including tectonic, earthquake, and volcanic weapons, as suggested by former Secretary of Defense William Cohen. Trump hinted at secret weapons, and the White House Office of Science Technology director stated the US can manipulate time and space. Technological progress has been intentionally suppressed, leading to stagnation and dependence. Technologies have been hoarded and developed primarily for weapons. The US created artificial suns by the 1950s and has gravitic craft and weapons. Russia and China also possess similar advanced systems. Quantum entanglement weaponry allows for carrier wave-free communication and potentially detonating enemy nuclear weapons remotely. Magnetic drones can destroy rockets, and direct energy weapons exist that cannot be shielded against. The Ice Cube Neutrino Detector in the South Pole is allegedly a directed energy weapon capable of causing earthquakes. CERN's experiments pose a risk of planetary destruction. The speaker suggests these technologies are dangerous and that humanity risks repeating the mistakes of Atlantis. The alexshowstore.com now offers high-quality methylene blue.

We used to have a sophisticated biological weapons program from World War 2 to the sixties, which ended in 1969. Many records of the program were destroyed, but some are resurfacing. Our offensive weapons program was massive and advanced, but not well-known by most people.

Last year I confronted Heizou Takinaka, the former Japanese finance minister, over why he handed over control of the Japanese financial system to a group of American and European oligarchs. They told me it was because Japan had been threatened by an earthquake machine. I did not believe it. After exposing their doings, the Japanese security police warned that Niigata City was going to be hit by an earthquake. Two days later, Japan's largest nuclear reactor was the epicenter of two earthquakes, both 6.8 in magnitude. That coincidence led me to research HARP, h a a r p. I realized they really did know how to make earthquakes. They do it by shooting a billion watt microwave into the ionosphere, which is a part of the atmosphere that has a lot of energy in it. That pushes the ionosphere up into outer space and then it rebounds, and the way it rebounds can cause earthquakes.

Historical precedents of climate manipulation in Vietnam are discussed, with the use of rainmaking operations to affect the monsoon season. The military is seen as the main manipulator of climate, using techniques such as ionospheric manipulation and high-energy lasers. The potential for creating storms, earthquakes, and tsunamis is explored, along with the development of weapons that can cause diseases and cancers. The speaker suggests that these technologies are part of the evolution of civilizations and may be necessary for interstellar travel. The lack of maturity in handling these technologies is highlighted, and the need for solutions to stabilize the Earth's climate is emphasized.

The speaker states that HARP's work on ionosphere management is complete and they are moving on to other methods of ionosphere control. When asked about a statement made to the Associated Press regarding weather tampering, the speaker confirms their belief that the American government has created weather control techniques so that the "new world order" will be able to starve millions of Americans and control the rest. They claim to possess documents, including patents and a statement from Senator Claiborne Pell, to prove this, asserting weather control was utilized as far back as the Vietnam War. They cite 85 simultaneous tornadoes as evidence and quote Senator Pell as saying weather wars are the greatest weapon ever created.

According to the senate, congress, and other people, the idea of weather control and electronically creating earthquakes is ridiculous. However, twenty years ago, the nation entered a convention promising not to use weather control against other countries, but this promise doesn't include using it against the United States. The speaker claims there are patents on equipment that can block, move, alter, and change the weather, including creating and expanding storms. This equipment can also generate ELF, low-frequency vibrations that can move the earth and possibly generate earthquakes. The speaker asserts that the equipment currently being used covertly in experiments and programs involving magnetics and electronic waves comes from original Tesla experiments.

A meeting discussed the potential impact of biological weapons on China, suggesting a pandemic could spread globally, leading to panic and military lockdowns in the West. This chaos could escalate into a third world war with significant nuclear exchanges. The conversation shifted to the motivations behind these actions, hinting at a belief among powerful groups, referred to as the Illuminati or cabal, that a major geophysical event is imminent. They have invested heavily in underground bases and emergency preparedness, possibly in anticipation of a catastrophic event that could threaten humanity. The idea is that with totalitarian control established, Western governments would be better positioned to manage the aftermath of such a disaster.

The discussion centers on the intensifying U.S. military actions and the broader strategic implications of potential escalation with Iran. The hosts describe visible signs of deployment: soldiers packing, mothers saying goodbye, and the looming possibility of an invasion or occupation in Iran’s Persian Gulf region. They question who in the White House is backing an operation described as complicated and risky, noting the earlier “Ishfaan operation” as an example of miscalculation when aircraft were shot down and rescue missions were needed. Captain Matthew Ho of the Eisenhower Media Institute joins to provide analysis. He argues the situation involves a “madman” and a “mad emperor,” making rational planning infeasible. If a deadline of 8 PM is met and Trump orders an attack on Iranian infrastructure, Ho believes the action would likely involve strikes on infrastructure rather than nuclear weapons, citing threats to Iranian infrastructure and past attacks on railways, bridges, petrochemical facilities, and pistachio warehouses. He predicts a broader bombing campaign targeting energy production and other critical facilities, followed by Iranian retaliation. Ho emphasizes that Iranian capabilities and sincerity in retaliation could lead to a dramatic disruption of energy production, plastics, fertilizer, and helium markets, potentially triggering a global depression due to cascading impacts on energy and supplies. Ho references previous warnings about a regional Iranian war with global consequences, noting that Iran’s response could be severe, especially if power plants and water treatment facilities are struck. He argues that such actions would have catastrophic humanitarian consequences, including hospital disruptions and harm to newborns in NICUs, and frames the potential escalation as a test of restraint and humility in U.S. leadership. He links the current trajectory to a broader pattern of American imperial overreach and questions the objective of the conflict. The discussion then shifts to J. D. Vance’s statements about tools in the U.S. toolkit that could be deployed, with the White House saying nuclear options are not intended. The panel explores possible non-nuclear options such as hypersonic missiles and the “mother of all bombs” (the 30,000-pound bomb), noting limitations like delivery from a C-130 or the risk of civilian harm when targeting infrastructure. Ho suggests past American bombings (e.g., Hanoi, 1944–45 Germany and Japan) as precedents but warns of the diabolical and long-term consequences, including healthcare and water systems failures, and the resulting human toll. The panel discusses the risk of broader regional involvement, including Israeli involvement. They debate whether smaller, more controllable nuclear weapons could be used, such as a dialed-down B61 warhead, potentially delivered via Tomahawk or newer missiles to target Iran’s nuclear sites (like Fordo or Natanz) while attempting to avoid wider fallout. There is speculation that Israel could be the more likely initiator of nuclear use given its regional calculus and endurance of Western support, though the U.S. and Israel are portrayed as entangled in a broader strategy of dominance in the Middle East. Tucker Carlson’s report is cited, with claims that Trump is considering nuclear options, prompting discussion about how officials might resist orders. The guests acknowledge the likelihood that many U.S. service members would follow orders, though there is concern about propaganda and the moral costs of war. They compare current events to the 1965 George Ball warning about escalation leading to humiliation or victory, and they frame the conflict as potentially signaling the end of the American empire amid ongoing geopolitical shifts. The conversation closes with remarks on American policy consistency, noting Obama’s Iran deal, Biden-era support for Israel, and the long-standing desire in Washington and Tel Aviv to confront Iran, culminating in the assertion that the war’s timing is aligned with a broader, decades-long agenda. The program ends with Captain Ho agreeing to continue monitoring developments as the deadline approaches.

Wernher von Braun taught me a strategy where the Russians were considered the enemy, followed by terrorists, third world countries, asteroids, and finally aliens. He mentioned that the idea of building space-based weapons against aliens was amusing, but emphasized that it was all a lie. He didn't provide a timeline, but believed that the effort to put weapons in space would accelerate beyond comprehension until it was too late.

Questions were raised about HAARP, the high-frequency active auroral research program in Alaska, which is currently managed by the Air Force Research Lab. The Air Force has completed its work at HAARP and plans to demolish the facility this summer. There was also a discussion about the potential for collaboration with the University of Alaska to take over HAARP. In a separate inquiry, a statement was made regarding government-created weather tampering techniques intended to control populations. The speaker claimed that such techniques exist, backed by patents and historical usage dating back to the Vietnam War. They expressed belief in the existence of weather manipulation, suggesting that recent weather events were not coincidental and provided assurance of supporting documents to substantiate these claims.

This is not just a nuclear carrier or nuclear weapons carrier. This is a nuclear missile or nuclear submarine drone. Because it's in the water, it can carry a much larger payload than something flying through the air. So you've got two systems now operating with nuclear reactors in them. This is a whole new level of technology. The US created a nuclear missile once. It was nuclear powered. It was contamination in flight. Everything around was contaminated. They had to back off. They couldn't master the technology. But it was traceable too because of the radiation. It was leaking everywhere. These systems don't leak radiation. They're very effective. And what they are, first of all, just to understand, is they're second strike systems. So if The US, in this case, starts getting feisty and psychotic and tries to because The US, by the way, does have a policy of first strike, whether it's from space or whether it's missile bound or whether it's submarines out of coast. If The US thinks that they can decapitate the Russian leadership and somehow take out all the Russian missiles that are on tracked carriers, on rail carriers, on ships all over the place. But let's assume somehow they decide they can do this. You've got two issues here. One, you've got the Poseidon, which may already be in place or can be launched from a carrier and travel over three, four, five days to get in place and then explode and create a wave. I mean, if they could actually put a 100 megaton explosion, I mean, a city buster missile is one megaton. 10 megatons is something that you wipe out the entirety of something like the size of New York. If they could put a 100 megaton warhead as has been proposed, you'd be facing a 200 meter wave, a 150, 200 meter wave that would destroy most anything in its path. And that considering 80%, almost 80% of the American population lives on either of the East or the West Coast, the majority being on the East Coast, that's one of those vengeance weapons that would just destroy The US effectively as a country. Then you've got the Borovayashnik, which can fly for weeks, months maybe. Who knows nobody knows exactly how long it can actually fly. If tensions are growing very high, you put a five, six, 10 of those up in the air, and they're just doing circles and waiting for command. So the enemy knows that if they do a decapitating strike, they're gonna get wet. They're gonna get a surprise.

Some people believe weather control and electronically created earthquakes are ridiculous. However, twenty years ago, our nation entered a convention promising not to use weather control against other countries, but this doesn't prevent using it against the United States. When Senator Cole asked about the New World Order using it as a weapon, that's what I meant. Patents exist for electronic means to block, move, alter, and change the weather, including creating and expanding storms. The technology can even generate ELF vibrations to move the earth and potentially cause earthquakes. This equipment is currently being used covertly in various experiments and programs involving magnetics and electronic waves, all stemming from original Tesla experiments.

Speaker 1 explains that Rickettsia is the same organism that causes Rocky Mountain spotted fever, the most deadly tick-borne disease in the United States. He says it was a germ being weaponized by the US military at the time, with attempts to stuff it into ticks. In Willie’s interviews, Willie claimed to have spent over a decade in the biological weapons program as a Fort Detrick contractor working on weaponizing fleas, ticks, and mosquitoes, aiming to mass-produce them and stuff fleas with plague, mosquitoes with Trinidad virus, and ticks with deadly or incapacitating diseases such as relapsing fever, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, rabies, and leptospirosis. He described it as similar to Doctor Strangelove, trying to create new diseases by mixing bacteria and virus in ticks with the intent of a stealth weapon. Speaker 1 continues that this would be the perfect stealth weapon—a poor man’s nuclear bomb—where a drop of insects on an enemy would weaken the population and tie up medical resources without destroying infrastructure like a nuclear blast would. A military bean-counter report is cited stating that tularemia, a tick-borne rabbit fever, could kill ten thousand people at a cost of $1.33 per life. Speaker 0 remarks that it is hard to digest and describes it as evil, expressing disbelief that such things could happen in the United States, but acknowledges the possibility.

At age 16, while in the Chinese military, the speaker was told that China's strategy to defeat the U.S. should avoid traditional warfare. The reasoning was that China was too poor and technologically behind, making a conventional war unwinnable. Instead, the suggested strategy involved the full use of bioweapons and chemical weapons. It also included working to turn Americans against each other through divide-and-conquer tactics to weaken the U.S. from within.

According to the senate, congress, and other people, the idea of weather control and electronically creating earthquakes is ridiculous. However, twenty years ago, the nation entered a convention promising not to use weather control against other countries, but this promise doesn't include using it against the United States. The New World Order may utilize weather control as a weapon against the U.S. There are patents on equipment that can block, move, alter, and change the weather, including creating and expanding storms. This equipment can also generate ELF, low-frequency vibrations that can move the earth and possibly generate earthquakes. The equipment being used covertly in experiments and programs involving magnetics and electronic waves comes from original Tesla experiments.

Clayton and Natalie opened by noting about 1,000,000 Americans were still without power after a brutal winter storm, then asked whether government or NGOs were involved in a cloud-seeding geoengineering operation prior to the weekend’s storm. They referenced eyewitness reports across the country showing increasing lines in the sky that day and the progression of the storm, asking what the operation was and what the fallout and death toll might be. Dane Wiggington of geoengineeringwatch.org joined and answered, “Yes, absolutely. 100% top to bottom” that the storm was engineered. He urged viewers to consider his prior discussion with Clayton and Natalie, then shifted to Iran as an example of weather warfare. He claimed Iran has been a victim of climate engineering for at least four decades, with NATO operations and Israel cutting off precipitation to Iran, leaving Tehran with a potential evacuation of 10,000,000 people due to drought. He referenced Ahmadinejad on the UN floor alleging NATO and Israel cut off Iran’s precipitation and tied this to the history of weather control and war. The conversation then connected to Lyndon Johnson’s 1962 assertion that the world’s cloud layer could be controlled, and Wiggington stated that “he who controls the weather controls the world.” He asserted that controlling precipitation allows destabilizing food supplies and populations, and that the Iranian climate science community has claimed NATO has been cutting off precipitation for decades. When asked about mechanics, Wiggington explained that climate intervention or weather warfare can be more effective at eliminating precipitation than augmenting it. He described the use of high pressure domes created by ionosphere heater facilities like HARP, which can transmit millions of watts to the ionosphere to heat air and form a high-pressure dome that blocks moisture. He claimed the Northern Hemisphere’s moisture is spun clockwise around this dome, then chemically nucleated and redirected, resulting in thunder-snow and ice storms in the U.S. He described a second method: overseeding with condensation nuclei that are too small to allow raindrop formation, producing featureless skies and no rainfall. He labeled these as patented processes and claimed they’ve been used against Iran for decades and are now being used against the United States. Natalie and Clayton pressed for connection to current events, noting widespread online reports of chemicals in the sky and aircraft activity. Wiggington alleged collaboration between NGOs, the U.S. government, and private defense contractors, including Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, for weather modeling, and claimed illegal gag orders suppress meteorologists. He argued the administration has doubled down on denial and cover-up and warned that each drop of rain is toxic, with peer-reviewed studies cited. He described chemically nucleated material as colder to the touch and suggested it reduces river runoff, citing record-low Colorado snowpack. The discussion touched on media portrayal and political figures, with Wiggington criticizing RFK Jr. and Lee Zeldin for denial or cover-up, and noting Trump’s “where’s your global warming now?” comment in relation to the storm. He warned of the potential for biological carriers like polymer fibers and graphene in rain samples and suggested the possibility of a future biological agent if control is lost. The segment closed with a call to wake up to climate engineering as a major factor tearing apart the climate system and to demand accountability from leaders.

Far from any city in the frozen wilderness of Alaska, a large field of antennas called HAARP—the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program—can be seen from space. HAARP is officially described as a research facility built to study the ionosphere, the electrified layer of Earth’s atmosphere where solar wind interacts with Earth’s magnetic field. The transcript also describes beliefs that HAARP is not only “listening” but “talking” to the sky and that it can affect conditions below. According to these beliefs, HAARP could be linked to unusual weather events such as storms appearing out of nowhere, heat waves in places that should be frozen, record-breaking floods, and droughts that last for years. The described theory claims that by blasting powerful radio waves into the upper atmosphere, HAARP can heat specific pockets of air. That heating is said to alter air pressure, which would then change wind, and wind would, in turn, influence broader weather patterns. The transcript frames this as a way to steer a hurricane and as a method to shut down an enemy’s crops without firing a single shot, presenting the idea of turning weather into a weapon.

The transcript presents a wide-ranging discussion about geoengineering, its methods, alleged environmental and health impacts, and the social, political, and economic consequences of manipulating the climate. - Definitions and methods - Geoengineering is defined as the artificial modification of the Earth's climate. Geoengineers are proposing spraying 10 to 20,000,000 tons of toxic aluminum and other substances into the sky to cool the planet. - Solar Radiation Management (SRM) is described as making the Earth whiter by reflecting sunlight with particles to reduce heat absorption; aluminum and sulfur are discussed as possible reflective agents. It is claimed that model results indicate reflection of sunlight can offset most climate change in most places most of the time, but will damage some places. - Aerosols, including oxides of metals (notably aluminum oxide) and other substances like barium and strontium, are said to function as cloud condensation nuclei, affect precipitation patterns, and interact with atmospheric moisture to influence weather. - Techniques such as cloud seeding and ionospheric heating (including HARP) are described as ways to modify weather by concentrating RF energy, dispersing particulates, or heating the ionosphere to alter jet streams and pressure systems. - Alleged evidence and observations - Observations of chemtrails and a “chemtrail geoengineering footprint” of aluminum, barium, and strontium are presented as widespread, with rain and snow samples allegedly showing these elements and linking them to patents and weather changes. - Reports of environmental changes in forests and soils are cited, including pH shifts toward alkalinity, tree and plant die-offs, and increased fungal infections in crops and ecosystems. - Claims that the sky is rarely blue, global dimming, reduced sunshine, and altered precipitation patterns are linked to aerosol operations and patent-driven goals. - Examples include droughts and floods in various regions, altered storm tracks, and unusual weather events such as anomalous snowfall and temperature swings. - Health, ecology, and agriculture - Alleged health impacts associated with inhaled metals (aluminum, barium, strontium) include rises in asthma, ADHD, autism, and other conditions; cited are concerns from rain- and soil-based studies and observations of changing ecosystems. - Organisms and crops are described as suffering under altered soils (pH changes), increased abiotic stress, and fungal pressures; references are made to Monsanto and GM crops as responses to these stresses, including drought- and flood-tolerance patents. - Organic farmers report declines in crop yields and quality, changes in the viability of basil, cilantro, and tomatoes, and a shift toward greenhouse cultivation to sustain production. - Economic and geopolitical dimensions - Weather is framed as a major driver of commodity markets; weather derivatives are described as financial tools used to hedge or profit from weather-related risk, with potential for immense profits if weather is manipulated. - There is a suggested link between geoengineering research funding (government grants and private funding, including Gates), corporate interests (Monsanto), and the commoditization of weather and food production. Claims include that droughts or floods could boost seed sales and corporate control over agriculture. - The narrative asserts a transfer of wealth and power to a few: corporations and financiers could profit from climate manipulation, while ordinary farmers and populations face food insecurity and market volatility. - Historical context is offered, including references to attempts at weather modification for military ends, the Montréal and NMOD treaties aimed at banning weather warfare, and the notion that domestic exemptions in treaties allow some activities within borders. - Military and governance implications - Weather modification is described as a potential force multiplier in warfare, capable of denying enemy access by creating extreme weather or redirecting storm tracks; historical anecdotes about hurricanes and monsoon manipulation are discussed. - The concept of “owning the weather by 2025” is cited as a military objective, with the idea that environmental manipulation could control battle spaces and influence outcomes. - Debates about sovereignty, accountability, and the ethics of weather control are raised, including concerns about lawsuits, international governance, and the rights of the global population to the atmosphere. - Calls to action and ethics - The speakers advocate public awareness, local-to-global organizing, whistleblowing, and dissemination of information to environmental, farm, health, and media groups. - There is a recurring warning that those who control weather could control food, markets, and political stability, and a lament that the atmosphere and biosphere belong to all of humanity, not to a few corporate or political actors. - Concluding tension - The film presents a tension between scientific capability to engineer climate and the untested, potentially dangerous consequences for ecosystems, health, and equitable access to resources. It emphasizes the need for vigilance, transparency, and public engagement to address possible harms and governance gaps.

We've finished our work with HARP, which was designed to inject energy into the ionosphere to control it, and are moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere. Regarding the statement about weather tampering techniques, that's exactly what I meant. Weather control techniques exist. We have a complete package of information, including patents and Senator Claiborne Pell's statements, which confirm its existence and use as far back as the Vietnam War. The government has created weather tampering techniques so that the new world order will be able to starve millions of Americans and to control the rest. As bizarre as it sounds, we have documents to prove it. The equipment is set up internationally. Senator Claiborne Pell stated that weather wars are the greatest weapon ever created.

Today, we're exploring a hurricane heading toward Florida and its potential connections to past events. In 1947, a hurricane named King followed a similar path, and I discovered that the US government and General Electric conducted a project that went wrong, resulting in flooding and casualties. A document titled "Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025" raises further questions about weather manipulation. Additionally, Operation Popeye involved using weather as a weapon in warfare. General Electric's documents outline various methods for controlling weather phenomena. This situation feels reminiscent of a simulation game. However, there are countermeasures, like Wilhelm Reich's Cloud Buster, which can mitigate these effects. It seems we may have insights into the origins of climate change and natural disasters. You can draw your own conclusions.

The speaker states that the American government has created weather tampering techniques so that the new world order will be able to starve millions of Americans and control the rest. He claims to have documents proving this, including patents on the equipment and Senator Claiborne Pell's statements. He asserts that the U.S. utilized weather control as far back as the Vietnam War. He believes it is not an accident that 85 tornadoes occurred simultaneously in the middle of a growing area. He says that weather wars are the greatest weapon ever created, quoting Senator Pell. He stands by his claim.

I confronted the former Japanese finance minister about handing over Japan's financial system to American and European oligarchs. He claimed Japan was threatened by an earthquake machine. Initially, I was skeptical. Later, after exposing some of their activities, the Japanese security police warned me that Niigata City would be hit by an earthquake because of my statements. Two days later, Japan's largest nuclear reactor was the epicenter of two 6.8 magnitude earthquakes. This led me to research HAARP. I discovered they could indeed trigger earthquakes by shooting a billion-watt microwave into the ionosphere, causing it to rebound. This rebound can create vibrations that, when precisely calibrated, can disrupt the rock beneath a target site, causing earthquakes.

The climate bomb is a secret weapon being developed that uses magnetic bombardment to cause devastating effects on a planetary scale. This includes floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, droughts, and cataclysms. It is part of climate-based geoengineering, which involves chemtrails and HAARP. Despite being labeled as conspiracy theories, there is evidence of disinformation and manipulation surrounding these techniques. Both the USA and Russia have the ability to manipulate the weather for military purposes. The US army has perfected this technology using the high frequency active auroral research program (HAARP), which operates in outer space and can destabilize agricultural and ecological systems worldwide. Climate warfare can destroy enemy countries' ecosystems, agriculture, and communication networks, leading to poverty and devastation without deploying troops. HAARP is connected to decades of space-based research and military development.

Troops in Nevada are getting ready for an underground lake explosion, which is said to be as powerful as 1,000 tons of TNT. This new weapon, known as the atomic satchel, can be carried by just one person. Another underground explosion releases radioactive debris into the sky. America is adding the atomic satchel to its arsenal.

The speaker claims a CIA whistleblower will testify before a Senate committee that the intelligence community has covered up the origin of COVID for years. The speaker asserts evidence shows the U.S. government funded research in Wuhan and that the virus likely escaped from a lab, adding that CIA scientists concluded it came from a lab leak and that someone later “scribbled out” their conclusion at 2AM and changed the report. The speaker frames CIA involvement as part of a larger effort involving military-related covert operations, stating the CIA has two reasons to live: covert support for the State Department or for the military. The speaker argues that over time, long-term CIA covert actions become USAID programs for logistical reasons, especially when scaling beyond a small “need to know” group and security-clearance constrained operations. The speaker says covert action requires secrecy, skiffs, close-hold communications, and a small number of people, so a public-facing program is needed to broaden participation. In that model, the speaker says USAID or state department programs can engage the private sector, nonprofits, universities, researchers, activists, and media, with public messaging and political support to help scale the underlying aims while keeping the core plan secret. The speaker links this asserted COVID narrative to historical biological warfare and “gain of function” research, citing declassified documents from the 1950s and Operation Northwoods-era plans involving Cuba. The speaker claims Cold War U.S. military and CIA planning included “gain of function” research and the dropping of disease-infected ticks and insects over Cuban agricultural areas to induce crop failures and economically destabilize Cuba without a conventional military invasion. The speaker further claims the plans involved making biological agents appear to be of natural origin and avoiding traceable external attribution, describing discussion of using “nonlethal insect borne biological warfare agents” and coordinating planning information with specific people and labs. The speaker states that, according to their account, biological warfare planning involved references to Fort Detrick and the Rocky Mountain lab in Montana, which they say also played a key role in both COVID-19 and Lyme disease. They claim the same lab used for Lyme was connected to plans for accidental releases intended to look natural. From there, the speaker argues that COVID-origin research ties into personnel and timelines. They claim that in 2015 the CIA and ODNI reached out to Ralph Baric to discuss coronavirus evolution and adapting coronaviruses to humans, and that shortly afterward Baric collaborated with Zheng Li Shi (“the bat lady”) on research funded through USAID’s PREDICT program. The speaker also claims that in 2018 Baric and Zheng Li Shi were listed as collaborators on a DARPA proposal involving a furin cleavage site, and that in January 2020 Baric was summoned by ODNI biological sciences experts to brief officials on coronavirus origins, discussing a possible accidental lab release at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The speaker asserts Avril Haines, then deputy head of the CIA, later became head of ODNI and played a key role in the Event 201 simulator. The speaker concludes by tying these threads back to the alleged CIA-to-USAID scaling mechanism and to CIA contractors and censorship efforts, claiming that the CIA’s role explains why CIA-walked scientists concluded a lab leak and why the conclusion was allegedly altered. They also discuss NIE/DOD/USAID/NED linkages, asserting that NED is suited for the role of supporting covert objectives with indirect public-facing infrastructure.