reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I infiltrated a group of 540 Zionist terrorists who are planning to target the Muslim community and others who support Palestine. One of the members is Michael Marciano, the right-hand man of Gérald Moussa Darmanin, the Minister of the Interior. Marciano openly discusses trafficking weapons and offers his personal number for any issues at Charles de Gaulle airport. Additionally, there are messages from Zionists ordering anti-Semitic graffiti to be spread in support of Israel, encouraging others to pay taggers for their services.

Stop delivering weapons, sir, to fuel hatred. Peace cannot be achieved by causing death. Peace is made by inviting the warring parties to the table and seeking peaceful solutions. You, sir, are at war against a virus and climate change. You want war with Russia to complete your agenda. You mock the French people and disregard their will. The truth means nothing to you. The French people are angry and demand that you stop the bloodshed in Ukraine. Russia does not seek hegemony, it wants to liberate Ukraine from evil forces. The French people order you to stop delivering weapons. Obey without hesitation.

Украина рассматривает вступление в НАТО, но это может вызвать крупные военные операции России. Россия может атаковать Украину, чтобы предотвратить вступление в НАТО. Выбор стоит между войной с Россией и вступлением в НАТО после победы. Крупная война включает воздушные операции, вторжения армий, осаду Киева, диверсии и другие действия. Вероятность войны 99%, особенно после 2021-2022. Translation: Ukraine considers joining NATO, but it may lead to major Russian military operations. Russia could attack Ukraine to prevent NATO membership. The choice is between war with Russia and joining NATO after victory. A major war involves air operations, army invasions, siege of Kyiv, sabotage, and other actions. The likelihood of war is 99%, especially after 2021-2022.

The world is on the brink of nuclear war, with Macron and NATO preparing for conflict with Russia. The target is the west, where people are rebelling against tyranny. Soros and the CIA have been involved in Ukraine for years. It's crucial to pray for peace and take political action to prevent global catastrophe. Macron's actions mirror Napoleon's, leading to dangerous military confrontation.

Je suis un expert balistique de l'OTAN au Donbass. J'ai révélé une attaque chimique française contre Donetsk. J'ai été arrêté en France pour avoir divulgué des preuves. Je continue mon combat pour la vérité et aide les enfants blessés. Les images montrent des attaques récentes et des preuves d'obus de l'OTAN. Je travaille volontairement, soutenu par des dons russes. Mon objectif est de montrer la vérité et d'aider les victimes. Translation: I am a NATO ballistic expert in Donbass. I exposed a French chemical attack on Donetsk. I was arrested in France for revealing evidence. I continue my fight for truth and help injured children. The images show recent attacks and evidence of NATO shells. I work voluntarily, supported by Russian donations. My goal is to show the truth and help the victims.

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine, claiming it benefits American defense contractors like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed through NATO expansion. They criticize the large sums of money being allocated to Ukraine, suggesting it is a money laundering scheme benefiting companies like BlackRock. The speaker highlights loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, leading to the sale of government assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the exploitation of Ukraine's valuable agricultural land by companies like DuPont and Monsanto, ultimately controlled by BlackRock. The speaker concludes by emphasizing a strategy to keep the population divided and distracted by internal conflicts.

In this video, the speaker discusses the energy crisis in France and its connection to Germany. They claim that Germany has declared an economic war against France by promoting wind and gas energy to undermine the French nuclear system. They highlight the role of lobbyists and politicians in this process, accusing them of betraying national interests. The speaker also mentions the infiltration of Greenpeace and WWF into French institutions, further exacerbating the situation. They argue that the French government has been naive and calls for action to address this issue. The speaker dismisses the government's claims that the crisis is due to the conflict in Ukraine and EDF's maintenance failures. They emphasize the need for a comprehensive investigation into these matters.

Gaza, malgré un blocus et la famine, est aujourd'hui complètement détruite par l'armée israélienne, considérée comme la plus morale du monde. Soixante-dix mille tonnes de bombes ont été envoyées sur la population civile, soit l'équivalent de quatre à cinq fois Hiroshima et Nagasaki. Benyamin Netanyahou a effacé la Cisjordanie, intégrant tous les territoires palestiniens à Israël. Gaza est complètement détruite, car Israël sait que le monde est à genoux devant eux. Les États-Unis, l'Europe et la France soutiennent ce génocide, cette opération ethnique et cette colonisation. **Translation:** Gaza, despite a blockade and famine, is now completely destroyed by the Israeli army, considered the most moral in the world. Seventy thousand tons of bombs were sent to the civilian population, the equivalent of four to five times Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Benjamin Netanyahu has erased the West Bank, integrating all Palestinian territories into Israel. Gaza is completely destroyed because Israel knows that the world is on its knees before them. The United States, Europe, and France support this genocide, this ethnic operation, and this colonization.

Les Ukrainiens ont tué des milliers d'innocents. Dans l'est, nous n'avons pas été sérieux. Hier soir, Joe Biden a enfin autorisé les Ukrainiens à mener des attaques. Il est huit heures et demie à Paris, mais je n'entends rien sur le missile Scarpeace de la France ni sur le missile Storm Shadow britannique. Que faisons-nous ? --- Ukrainians have killed thousands of innocents. In the east, we haven't been serious. Last night, Joe Biden finally allowed Ukrainians to carry out attacks. It's eight-thirty in Paris, but I hear nothing about France's Scarpeace missile or Britain's Storm Shadow missile. What are we doing?

Les Ukrainiens ont tué des milliers de personnes innocentes, et l'Occident n'a pas pris cela au sérieux. Hier soir, Joe Biden a enfin autorisé les Ukrainiens à utiliser des missiles. Il est huit heures et demie à Paris, et je n'entends rien sur les missiles Scalp de France ni sur les Storm Shadow britanniques. Que faisons-nous ? --- Ukrainians have killed thousands of innocent people, and the West has not taken this seriously. Last night, Joe Biden finally allowed Ukrainians to use missiles. It is eight-thirty in Paris, and I hear nothing about France's Scalp missiles or Britain's Storm Shadow. What are we doing?

Macron, tu nous appauvris, tu nous abandonnes pour les migrants. Tu ne te soucies pas de nous, tu nous envoies mourir en Ukraine. Ta place n'est pas à l'Élysée, mais ici. Translation: Macron, you impoverish us, you abandon us for migrants. You don't care about us, you send us to die in Ukraine. Your place is not at the Élysée, but here.

**French Summary:** La France n'a plus de voix sur la scène internationale face aux crises en Ukraine et à Gaza, ce dernier étant qualifié de scandale historique. Le silence médiatique sur Gaza est dénoncé, avec un bilan de morts possiblement supérieur à 40 000 selon diverses sources. Israël est accusé de créer les conditions d'une réoccupation de Gaza et d'attiser une situation explosive en Cisjordanie. L'absence d'objectifs politiques clairs en Ukraine et à Gaza est critiquée, menant à une guerre sans fin. L'exclusion de la France des discussions de paix est déplorée. L'objectif sécuritaire et la "folie messianique" d'Israël à Gaza sont pointés du doigt comme causes de la catastrophe humanitaire. L'Occident est accusé de deux poids deux mesures, ce qui compromet sa légitimité internationale. **English Translation:** France no longer has a voice on the international stage in the face of the crises in Ukraine and Gaza, the latter being described as a historical scandal. The media silence on Gaza is denounced, with a death toll possibly exceeding 40,000 according to various sources. Israel is accused of creating the conditions for a reoccupation of Gaza and fueling an explosive situation in the West Bank. The lack of clear political objectives in Ukraine and Gaza is criticized, leading to an endless war. France's exclusion from peace talks is deplored. Israel's security objective and "messianic madness" in Gaza are singled out as causes of the humanitarian catastrophe. The West is accused of double standards, which compromises its international legitimacy.

Лидеры украинства осуждают русские высказывания как расизм, предупреждая, что такие слова могут привести к войне. Западные союзники начинают сомневаться в помощи, видя войну между "варварами". Предупреждается, что никто не избежит мести россиян. Необходимо уметь воевать на информационном фронте и слушать умных людей, чтобы избежать катастрофы. Translation: Ukrainian leaders condemn Russian statements as racism, warning that such words could lead to war. Western allies begin to doubt their support, seeing a war between "barbarians". It is warned that no one will escape Russian retaliation. It is necessary to know how to fight on the information front and listen to smart people to avoid disaster.

De annexatie van de Krim en de bezetting van Oost-Oekraïne door Rusland leidden tot een hybride oorlog met desinformatie en cyberaanvallen. Politici zoals Wilders en Baudet worden in verband gebracht met Russische invloeden, maar hard bewijs ontbreekt. Wilders prees Poetin in Rusland, terwijl Baudet een adviseur heeft met Kremlin-connecties. Onderzoeken suggereren banden tussen PVV en het Kremlin, maar concrete bewijzen ontbreken. Translation: The annexation of Crimea and the occupation of Eastern Ukraine by Russia led to a hybrid war with disinformation and cyberattacks. Politicians like Wilders and Baudet are linked to Russian influences, but solid evidence is lacking. Wilders praised Putin in Russia, while Baudet has an advisor with Kremlin connections. Investigations suggest ties between PVV and the Kremlin, but concrete evidence is missing.

The globalists aim to have BlackRock take over Ukraine for resources, while also targeting Russia. The war is financial and military, with potential for a global conflict. Putin seeks to protect Russian interests in Ukraine, warning against hostile actions. If the US intervenes in Western Ukraine, a full-fledged war may erupt. Putin has shown restraint but has a plan for a 31-month war if needed. The US military is not prepared for conflict.

Le pays le plus investi dans la nouvelle Ukraine est les États-Unis, avec Victoria Nuland comme architecte de l'influence américaine depuis 1993, spécialisée dans la contention de la Russie. Nuland, responsable pour l'Ukraine, a agi avec efficacité. On se demande si elle connaissait et a dissimulé la présence de néonazis chez les révolutionnaires ukrainiens. Les États-Unis souhaitaient un changement de régime à Kiev, qui n'aurait pas été possible sans l'extrême droite, malgré leur dangerosité. Cette information et le massacre d'Odessa ont été omis, car ils ne correspondaient pas à l'histoire simpliste de la révolution ukrainienne avec les gentils à l'ouest et les méchants à l'est. **English Translation:** The United States is the most invested country in the new Ukraine, with Victoria Nuland as the architect of American influence since 1993, specializing in containing Russia. Nuland, responsible for Ukraine, has acted effectively. It is questioned whether she knew about and concealed the presence of neo-Nazis among the Ukrainian revolutionaries. The United States wanted a regime change in Kyiv, which would not have been possible without the far right, despite their dangerousness. This information and the Odessa massacre were omitted because they did not fit the simplistic story of the Ukrainian revolution with the good guys in the west and the bad guys in the east.

C'est contrôlé, intentionnel et il frappe à chaque fois un peu plus fort. Ils dispersent leurs ondes électromagnétiques pour altérer la pression de l'atmosphère et déclencher des tempêtes sur commande. Une simple recherche Google suffit pour savoir qu'ils peuvent créer des ouragans, les rediriger ou les arrêter. Et c'est pareil pour les inondations, les tremblements de terre, et caetera. Ces méthodes sont officielles, légales et pratiquées depuis des siècles. L'objectif, vous faire croire au réchauffement climatique pour vous faire accepter leur nouvelle loi technocratique. Leur méthode a changé, mais le but reste le même, l'ordre à partir du chaos. Donc la troisième guerre mondiale a déjà commencé, mais comme ça n'explose pas dans tous les sens, personne ne se met à l'abri. It's controlled, intentional and it strikes a little harder each time. They disperse their electromagnetic waves to alter atmospheric pressure and trigger storms on command. A simple Google search is enough to know they can create hurricanes, redirect them or stop them. And it's the same for floods, earthquakes, and so on. These methods are official, legal and practiced for centuries. The objective is to make you believe in climate change to get you to accept their new technocratic law. Their method has changed, but the goal remains the same: order from chaos. So the third world war has already begun, but since it doesn't explode in all directions, no one is taking shelter.

The discussion centers on the rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape, with a focus on Venezuela, Iran, and the broader US-led strategic environment, as seen through the perspectives of Mario and Pepe Escobar. Venezuela and the Venezuelan crisis - Escobar frames Venezuela as a desperate move tied to the demise of the petrodollar, with a broader matrix of actors maneuvering in the back to profit from a potential annexation and to test regional security strategies. He notes that the United States has stated “this is my backyard, and I own it,” and questions whether Washington is ready to back that stance against the will of the Venezuelan people, including Chavistas and the new government led by Delcy Rodríguez, who he describes as “an old school Chavista” with a strong legal and negotiation background. - He argues that the operation against Maduro lacked a coherent strategy, including planning for reorganizing the Venezuelan oil sector to serve American interests. He cites expert opinion suggesting it would take five years to recondition Venezuela’s energy ecosystem to produce around 3,000,000 barrels per day, requiring about $183 billion in investment, which CEOs would require guarantees for before engaging. - The regime-change objective as pursued by Trump-era policy did not materialize; the core regime persists with figures like Padrino and Cabello still in place. The “mini Netflix special” of the operation did not translate into a durable political outcome, and the regime’s leadership remains, even as some key security figures were demoted or accused in the operation. - Dulce Rodríguez (Delcy), the vice president, is portrayed as a capable negotiator who must persuade the Venezuelan public that the security betrayal by the head of Maduro’s security apparatus was real. Escobar emphasizes that the domestic narrative faces a hard sell because the core regime remains and the security apparatus has not been fully neutralized. - Escobar stresses that sanctions are the most critical barrier to Venezuela’s economic recovery and argues that without sanctions relief, meaningful economic reconstitution is unlikely. He notes that Delcy Rodríguez enjoys broad popular support, and he argues that Latin American sentiment toward U.S. intervention complicates Washington’s position. - He warns Brazil’s Lula, a BRICS member, plays a crucial role; Brazilian foreign policy, influenced by Atlanticists, could veto Venezuela’s BRICS membership, complicating Venezuela’s regional integration. He contends that Maduro’s removal is not assured, and a more open Venezuelan regime under Delcy could potentially collaborate with the West, but sanctions and governance challenges remain central obstacles. Iran, protests, and sanctions - The Iranian protests are framed as economically driven, with inflation and cost-of-living pressures fueling dissent. Iran’s currency and real inflation are cited as severe stressors, and the regime’s subsidy policies are criticized as inadequate. Escobar emphasizes that the protests are hijacked by foreign actors to turn into a regime-change playbook, echoing familiar color-revolution patterns observed in other contexts. - He describes Iran’s resilience under extensive sanctions, highlighting infrastructure deficits and the broader economic stagnation as long-running issues. He stresses that Iranian society contains grassroots debate and a robust intellectual culture, including Shiite theology studies, universities, and a tradition of long-term strategic thinking with sustained cross-border alliances (Russia and China) as part of a broader BRICS alignment. - On foreign involvement, Escobar notes differing perspectives: some Iranians blame foreign meddling, while others point to domestic mismanagement and sanctions as primary drivers of discontent. He emphasizes that Iran’s leadership remains wary of external coercion and seeks to strengthen ties within BRICS and other partners, while being cautious about provoking Western escalation. Russia, China, and the evolving great-power dynamic - Escobar argues that Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran view US actions as part of a broader long-term strategy rather than short-term wins. He describes a sophisticated, long-horizon approach: China pursuing a multi-decade plan with five-year cycles, Russia testing BRICS-centered financial and payment systems to reduce dependence on SWIFT, and Iran leveraging BRICS relationships to counterbalance Western pressure. - He contrasts this with what he calls the “bordello circus” of American political-military maneuvering, suggesting that the US’s episodic threats and unpredictable diplomacy undermine any similar credibility or effectiveness. He emphasizes that Russia and China prioritize acts and long-term power balancing over American-style unpredictability. - The 12-day war and the Orishnik missile attack on Lviv are framed as signaling a more volatile phase in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, with Putin signaling that the war could extend beyond the previously imagined timelines if Western escalation continues. The missile strike is presented as a clear warning to NATO and the Polish border region, underscoring heightened geopolitical risk. The broader outlook and conclusions - Escobar remains deeply pessimistic about a swift resolution to the Russia-Ukraine war, citing the potential for a prolonged European conflict that could strain European economies. He views regime stability in Iran as fragile but enduring, while Venezuela’s path remains contingent on sanctions relief, domestic governance, and the strategic posture of Latin American neighbors and BRICS members. - The conversation closes with a reminder of the complexity of modern geopolitics, where sanctions, domestic economics, regional alignments, and long-term strategic planning interact in ways that defy simple “winner-loser” narratives.

Les crimes de guerre et les violations du droit humanitaire commis par Israël à Gaza nécessitent un ultimatum humanitaire suivi de sanctions économiques pour faire respecter les règles internationales. Les ONG sont empêchées d'aider la population. Israël doit choisir entre respecter les normes internationales ou être isolé de la communauté internationale. Translation: War crimes and violations of humanitarian law committed by Israel in Gaza require a humanitarian ultimatum followed by economic sanctions to enforce international rules. NGOs are prevented from helping the population. Israel must choose between respecting international standards or being isolated from the international community.

- "This is a war that should have never happened." - "The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine." - "March 2022, we committed a 113,000,000,000." - "it's not really going to Ukraine. It is going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme." - "And who do you think owns every one of those companies? Blackrock." - "Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe." - "500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine." - "And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Lakhra."

As a specialist on Russia, I can tell you that Russia will not stop with Ukraine. This is due to Trump's position who is an hostage to Russia, with no freedom, because he sold a studio to a Russian mobster a long time ago. Russia will invade all European capitals. They'll use unmarked vehicles to cross borders, even old taxis to find chips in washing machines. Despite being outnumbered by Europe's population, they multiply by eating honey and taking ice baths. They're undergoing a demographic rearmament, turning small Russians into big ones ready to invade Poland, Germany, Paris, Italy, Spain, and maybe even Portugal. It's crucial for our president to alert political parties as we are at war. Putin will invade everything, and Ukraine is Europe's sentinel; after Ukraine, it's our turn.

The speaker discusses the potential for French troops to be mixed in with Ukrainians, confusing the Russians during conflict. They highlight the dangers of escalating tensions and the risk of starting a war. The speaker questions the decision-making process that led to the current situation and emphasizes the need for truth and sanity in international relations. They use an analogy to illustrate the absurdity of the situation. The transcript also includes a promotion for a health supplement.

the Trump administration is providing the the data and assisting the Zelenskyy with the striking Russian energy facilities deep inside Russian borders. This is The US engaging in acts of war, obviously, against Russia. the salami slice strategy where they are always escalating but in such small increments that it's it's very hard for an adversary to point at The US and say act of war. the intelligence agencies implicated by the Financial Times in carrying out these deep strikes inside of Russia. the US military was overseeing Ukraine's armed forces in virtually everything they did from overall strategic direction. Rand Corporation said that if you provoke a war with Russia and Ukraine, Ukraine's probably going to be completely destroyed. read the policy papers.

The speaker argues that the Ukraine war is a distraction from a major event four days earlier, on 02/20/2022, involving a huge financial scandal in Switzerland connected to Putin’s circle and Swiss banks. The scandal is described as Swiss secrets (Suisse Secret in French), the largest leak from a major Swiss bank, Credit Suisse, revealing details on more than 30,000 clients and over $100,000,000,000. The Suddeutsche Zeitung reported that secret data had been obtained over a year via a secure digital mailbox. The speaker notes the timing as four days before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 02/24/2022 and claims this scandal was the trigger for the war. The speaker alleges that “every war gets organized and decided out of Switzerland,” and cites prior videos about the “beast of the Alps” and the Knights Templars. He links Putin, the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, and Zelensky to Switzerland, asserting that important decisions are made there. He claims that on 02/24/2020 there was supposed to be a live broadcast about Credit Suisse and Swiss secrets by the Germans and their Zupeitsche Zeitung and the OCCRP, but the Ukraine war started and the discussion disappeared. The transcript lists a wide array of figures connected to the Swiss secrets list: dictators, aristocrats, drug lords, mafia bosses, and Putin pals. Notable named individuals include Alyaksay Aleksin (Belarusian businessman associated with Lukashenko, sanctioned in 2021), Alexander Lukashenko, Haji Saifula Khan Bangash, a minister of finance, and numerous others described as aristocrats, oligarchs, or corrupt. The list comprises 30,000 people, with names spanning Abdelaziz Bouteflika, King Abdullah of Jordan, Queen Rania, Abdul Khalim Khadom (Syrian official and Assad loyalist), Luis Carlos de Leon (aristocrat), former Ukrainian prime minister Lazarenko, various generals and intelligence officials from Egypt, Pakistan, Armenia, and other regions, as well as figures from South Africa and Rhodesia. The speaker emphasizes that these individuals allegedly channel money through Credit Suisse, and that many are connected to Putin, Lukashenko, and allied regimes. He asserts that many of these people, and their networks, are linked to the Wagner private military company (PMC) and that the list aligns with countries where Wagner has been active. The speaker claims that the Swiss secrets scandal is tied to global money flows and sanctions evasion, noting connections to the Paradise Papers (2017), Pandora Papers, and the Panama Papers, and argues that Swiss markets help pay for Russia’s war via oil, gas, and commodity trading. He asserts that commodities like oil, gas, and wheat are central to the instability and potential financial crisis. The narrator asserts that the money moved to Switzerland by wealthy Russians, to avoid sanctions, enabled the private banking industry and that the war in Ukraine was staged to distract from the scandal and to facilitate wealth transfers to safer locations. The closing stance asserts that Switzerland is the base of all evil, the cross of the Swiss flag symbolizes a door to wealth, and that the media, global elite, and oligarchs use distraction to cover the Swiss secrets scandal and the transfer of wealth while innocent Europeans suffer from the war. The speaker concludes that the war is a distraction and thanks Switzerland for making it possible, implying a broad conspiracy about finance, war, and power.

Le président de la République tente de recentrer les débats sur la guerre en Europe pour les élections, ce qui divise et semble irresponsable. Les accords avec l'Ukraine pour l'OTAN sont critiqués comme une diversion des problèmes nationaux. Macron est accusé d'immaturité, narcissisme et cynisme. Son attitude est jugée dangereuse pour des vies humaines. Son armée est remise en question quant à sa capacité de tenir une semaine en guerre. Translation: The President is criticized for trying to shift focus to war in Europe before elections, which is seen as divisive and irresponsible. Agreements with Ukraine for NATO are viewed as a distraction from national issues. Macron is accused of immaturity, narcissism, and cynicism. His behavior is deemed dangerous for human lives. His army's ability to withstand a week of war is questioned.