reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The FDA, NIH, and CDC recommended vaccinating pregnant women at any time, leading to a rise in maternal mortality. A recent paper showed a concerning increase in maternal deaths in the US, erasing decades of progress in obstetrics. Pregnant women are dying with no mention of COVID or vaccines in the report. This alarming trend should be a cause for concern for everyone.

Data indicates a mechanism is impairing uteruses, causing placentas to flatten and lack blood vessels needed to nourish the baby. Maternal death rates are reportedly up 40%. All the information is available, and the speaker believes the time for action has passed.

After 40 years of studying reproductive toxicology, I always refer to these studies when unsure about a drug. The findings are shocking, with numerous cases of pregnancy loss and severe malformations such as missing brains, skulls, and eyes, as well as rib abnormalities. If any of these issues are present in a reproductive toxicology study, I would never prescribe the drug under any circumstances.

Companies pay large sums for women's placentas, used in pharmaceuticals, beauty products, and medical procedures. Placentas from c-sections are more valuable due to less contamination, leading to higher prices. This may incentivize more c-sections, raising concerns about coercion.

In a hospital setting, we have witnessed the devastating impact of the virus on infants, pregnant women, and young individuals. Some babies have tragically died at birth due to their mother's infection. Unvaccinated pregnant women face a twenty-fold increased risk of premature birth and a three to five-fold increased risk of fetal death in the womb. These statistics highlight the urgent need for pregnant women to get vaccinated.

A CNN investigation reveals growing concern among scientists and government officials that ultrasound may not be entirely harmless and is potentially overused on pregnant women. They fear possible genetic damage to the fetus, potentially leading to cancer and subtle birth defects that might not appear for years. Geneticist Dr. Arthur Bloom notes early studies suggest diagnostic levels of ultrasound can damage human and rodent cells. Radiologist Dr. Doreen Rebiskind's research shows ultrasound exposure causes abnormal changes in cells, behaving similarly to cells damaged by X-rays. FDA officials admit they cannot definitively say diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy is safe. An FDA study indicates that children exposed to ultrasound in utero have reduced birth weights. Experts suggest ultrasound should not be used for routine monitoring of low-risk pregnancies. Dr. Bloom estimates that over a million women receive unnecessary ultrasounds. There is concern that subjecting a female fetus to ultrasound near term could affect not only her cells but also all her eggs for the next generation. Ultrasound is used in scans, Doppler fetal monitors, and electronic fetal monitors. No controlled studies exist on the long-term effects of ultrasound on human development.

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to nearly 6 in my career. In 2021, stillbirth rates for fetuses are alarming, with a rate of 29.3, indicating a significant deviation. Instances of stillbirths and fetal abnormalities are on the rise, possibly linked to the inflammatory effects of vaccines. Safety monitoring systems have not identified increased risks for pregnant individuals receiving vaccines. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to harm, as known for decades.

We cannot afford to trust WHO anymore, and several issues have caused great concern. In 2014 and 2015, WHO brought a tetanus eradication campaign to Kenya focused on eradicating neonatal tetanus—tetanus in babies after birth. The vaccine used was described as a different type of tetanus vaccine: tetanus combined with the hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which “supports pregnancy.” The claim is that when injected into a woman, the vaccine causes her to produce antibodies against the hormone, rendering her sterile. The speaker says this has been associated with an increase in infertility cases among young couples who are examined and found to be normal but cannot get children, as well as couples who lose three, four, or five pregnancies before carrying a pregnancy to term. The speaker says they were able to expose these concerns and published a paper available to others. The speaker adds that in 2017, WHO stated Kenya is now free of neonatal tetanus and left the country. The speaker further states that the vaccine was developed over a 20-year research period from 1972 to 1992 and that it was used in South America, and “it is possible it has been used in many other African countries.”

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to 5.8-6 per 1,000 live births. In 2021, the stillbirth rate for fetuses is alarming at 29.3 per 1,000. Reports from Waterloo, Canada show 83 stillbirths out of 4,000 deliveries, with 13 dead fetuses in a 24-hour period. Vaccines are linked to inflammatory effects causing fetal harm. Safety monitoring systems found no significant risks for pregnant women. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to damage, injury, and death, a known fact for decades.

The Pfizer documents reveal a deliberate effort to harm reproductive health. There are various conditions affecting women's menstrual cycles, such as constant bleeding, two periods a month, or no periods at all. Some women experience agonizing cramps or hemorrhages. The lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines can cross the placenta, leading to compromised placentas in vaccinated mothers. These placentas show calcifications that hinder nourishment and normal growth of the baby. Maternal deaths during childbirth have increased by 40%, resembling a pre-twentieth century situation. The compromised placentas are silvery gray, lack resilience, and result in impaired babies. Fetal malformations and chromosomal aberrations are also being observed. Babies may appear fine at birth but develop respiratory distress within a day.

Doctors administered untested gene therapy to infants, toddlers, and pregnant women, claiming it was safe. However, the mRNA jab was deemed the most dangerous medical product for pregnant individuals. Traditional medical principles were disregarded, including giving experimental drugs to pregnant patients and assuming any death or injury post-intervention was related. Regulatory authorities worldwide dismissed adverse events as unrelated until proven otherwise, leading to disastrous consequences.

COVID-19 has led to an increase in premature births, preeclampsia, low amniotic fluid, and postpartum hemorrhages. Preeclampsia is related to the health of the placenta, but its exact cause is unknown. The rise in preeclampsia and low amniotic fluid has resulted in more induced premature deliveries. Postpartum hemorrhages have also increased, with some women requiring immediate hysterectomies due to uncontrollable bleeding. Even patients without risk factors have experienced hemorrhages after elective C-sections. Traditional methods to stop bleeding have been less effective, and the bleeding seems to occur lower down in the uterus. These complications are concerning and require further investigation.

There is growing concern that ultrasound may not be entirely harmless. Some studies suggest that diagnostic levels of ultrasound can cause genetic damage and abnormal cell behavior. While experts have no evidence of harm to human fetuses, they advise caution and limited use of ultrasound until more is known. The FDA has conducted research on ultrasound and found that it may lead to low birth weight in babies. However, some experts believe that warnings about ultrasound are unnecessary and may cause unnecessary fear. Overuse of ultrasound is also a concern, with more than 50% of pregnant women receiving it, even when not medically necessary. Until more is known, it is recommended to use ultrasound sparingly to avoid potential long-term genetic effects.

COVID has allegedly led to athletes dropping dead and caused cardiomyopathies and pulmonary emboli. Newborn babies are now born without stem cells, and there are "death doulas" to deliver dead babies, a field that purportedly didn't exist before. COVID was a "nightmare" for obstetrics, gynecology, labor, and delivery. Some midwives don't want to return to work due to vaccine-related birth problems damaging their reputations. If the COVID vaccine causes blood clots, it will affect the placenta, which is primarily blood vessels. No studies showed the vaccine was safe for pregnant women, yet it was recommended. Influenza and pertussis vaccines, also recommended for pregnant women, have not been tested for carcinogenicity or mutagenicity. These vaccines change the immune reactivity of the infant. The "sound bite lie" spreads faster than the truth, and those who question the science are labeled as crazy.

New pregnant women often consider ultrasound scans, which use high-frequency sound waves to create images of the fetus. While doctors generally deem ultrasound safe, concerns are emerging about potential long-term risks, including genetic damage and low birth weight. Some studies suggest ultrasound may cause subtle birth defects and affect fetal development, although no overt malformations have been detected. Experts urge caution, noting that ultrasound is often overused, with many low-risk pregnancies receiving scans unnecessarily. The FDA acknowledges it cannot guarantee ultrasound safety, and ongoing research is needed to understand its effects on human fetuses. Overall, while ultrasound is a valuable tool, its routine use should be reconsidered until more is known about its long-term implications.

J. Marion Sims performed surgeries on enslaved black women without anesthesia. The Tuskegee experiment withheld penicillin from black men with syphilis. Puerto Rican women were given experimental birth control pills, resulting in seizures and hemorrhages. At Edgewood Arsenal, over 60,000 troops were exposed to nerve gas and LSD. The Navy sprayed San Francisco with bacteria linked to pneumonia. The Pentagon released weaponized mosquitoes in Florida. Soldiers were infected with biological agents in Operation White Coat. Millions were injected with the SV40 virus. Military planes sprayed mock bioweapons on civilian cities. Pregnant women at Vanderbilt drank radioactive iron. Orphans were fed radioactive milk. MK Ultra used extreme electroshock and sensory deprivation. Lyme disease mutations were researched at Fort Detrick. Vaccines are claimed to have catastrophic fertility side effects, micro clots, graphene, and prion contamination. The US funded gain of function research in Wuhan. Anthony Fauci funneled millions into weaponizing viruses. Government agencies are accused of experimenting, burning records, and denying the truth.

The speaker says that even for obstetrics and gynecology societies, vaccination during pregnancy has been pursued as a duty, but physicians do not know the actual facts. They reference the New England Journal of Medicine, a famous medical journal, where a study of a vaccine’s adverse outcomes claimed that the user rate was 12.6%. Based on that paper, the Sanpeshikawa (Sanbushikawa) Association reportedly promoted vaccination for pregnant women as well. In reality, the data were as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in late pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stages (first trimester). When restricting to the 127 people who were under 20 weeks, the usage rate was 82%. Therefore, the speaker argues that this data reveals how dangerous the vaccine is, and that the data were hidden and mixed with high-profile 700-person data to produce the 12.6% miscarriage rate that was published. This is presented as evidence of a situation where even in medical journals, information was handled to favor the other side due to money and other influences.

The Pfizer papers reveal an intentional attack on human sexuality, particularly targeting women and babies. We have evidence that they killed babies, poisoned breast milk, damaged placentas, and lowered sperm counts, and they were fully aware of these consequences. Internal charts document the injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles. The data indicated that babies were dying in utero due to the maternal COVID vaccine exposure. Despite this knowledge being presented to Dr. Walensky, she advised pregnant women to get vaccinated before, during, or after pregnancy. Their actions, which included a thirteen to twenty percent drop in live births, demonstrate an attempt to sterilize and eliminate us. Despite the deaths and struggles with fertility that resulted, we survived, and the truth has come to light.

Pfizer documents reveal a deliberate attack on human sexuality, particularly harming women and babies. The documents show knowledge of fetal deaths, poisoned breast milk, placental damage, and reduced sperm counts. Charts detail the injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles. Despite this, recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy were issued. This was a massive, satanic act. The 13-20% drop in live births proves they knew the consequences. They attempted to kill and sterilize us. Many died, and fertility struggles will continue, but we survived, and the truth is out.

Pregnant women who received COVID-19 shots experienced concerning effects, according to maternal fetal medicine expert Dr. Against Thorpe. The shots quickly spread throughout the body, crossing barriers like the placenta and blood-brain barriers in both the mother and fetus. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots led to more adverse events in women of reproductive age. Data showed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and over twice the risk of negative fetal outcomes across six categories. Additionally, birth rates in several European countries dropped significantly after widespread COVID-19 vaccination. As a result, researchers are urging the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for individuals of childbearing and reproductive age.

Many drugs once deemed safe and effective have been removed from the market due to serious health risks. For example, Accutane was linked to liver damage after 27 years, and DES, initially used to prevent miscarriages, was found to cause them instead. Thalidomide, which caused severe birth defects, also raised concerns. The funding sources for studies are crucial, as industry grants often influence research outcomes. Universities and nonprofits may receive funding from these industries, leading to potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, medical journals rely on industry advertising, which can compromise their integrity. A significant issue is that companies can selectively publish data, omitting studies that do not support their claims. Ultimately, the field of science is lacking in ethics.

The speaker reveals that a vaccine funded by the WHO was discovered to be a fertility regulating vaccine. It was used without women's knowledge in South America in 1993. The vaccine caused idiopathic infertility, irregular periods, failed pregnancies, threatened abortions, premature labor, and other complications. These findings suggest a sinister agenda behind the vaccine's use.

Speaker 0: A child born in a hospital in The United States today, within an hours of coming from source into this body, the first thing that happens to them is pharmaceutical intervention without really asking, barely informed consent. That child's eyes are smeared with erythromycin ointment, and they're given a hepatitis B vaccine in their first day of life. And the hep B vaccine is for hepatitis B, which is a sexually transmitted disease, an IV drug user disease, of course, which babies are not gonna be exposed to, and yet every single baby in America is getting the intervention. So from the literally the day we are born, we're— Speaker 1: I these mean, why not test the pregnant mother for those? Speaker 0: They do. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: So They give it to the women who even if they have tested negative— Speaker 1: they give majority. Absolutely. So I don't understand why would you treat a child on his first day of life for illnesses you know for a fact he doesn't have, it isn't gonna get? Speaker 2: So a child's born let's just take the sign. The child's born. Hep B is spread by two routes, sexually transmitted disease or intravenous needles. So my one day old isn't going to be having sex or doing heroin right away. So what's the purpose of getting this on the schedule in the first day of life, the first hours of life? Speaker 0: And if you push, and I welcome anyone to do this with their doctor, you get to two things. You get to the American patients are too stupid to remember, so we need to do it right away. That's literally like what they say. And then my doctor told me that that a child at daycare could trip over a needle that has hepatitis B on it. That's literally what they get to. Speaker 2: That a needle could be on the playground that somebody just did heroin or something, threw the needle down, and it has hepatitis B blood on it. I asked the doctor, has there ever been in human history a case of hepatitis B two being transferred that way? They said no. It's only through intravenous needles and sex. So you actually to to just to steel man this, and, again, welcome anyone to respond, there is not actually a scenario absent of intravenous needles or sex, that a person gets hepatitis b. Speaker 0: There is not a reason for this to be given.

Dr. James Thorpe, a board-certified maternal fetal medicine and OBGYN physician, discusses the concerning increase in pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, infertility, fetal anomalies, and chromosomal abnormalities. He presents data showing the high number of deaths associated with a drug that was rolled out despite being known as the most dangerous in medical history. Dr. Thorpe reveals that the Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, FDA, and medical boards were aware of the risks but chose to bury the information due to financial interests. He emphasizes that using novel substances in pregnancy goes against the golden rule of medicine and highlights the catastrophic problems caused by this drug. The American College of OB GYN's narrative is driven by financial motives, as they would have to repay millions of dollars if they change their stance.