reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Two studies are described as disturbing. - Carman and colleagues conducted an animal study in which rats were injected with mRNA shots that destroyed 60% of their primordial follicles, the nonrenewable egg supply in women. The treatment also destroyed all other types of eggs, including those that spawn after the primordial version, effectively decimating the ovarian system. - Manichi and colleagues conducted a large human study, analyzing data from 1.3 million women. They compared vaccinated to unvaccinated women, finding that the vaccinated woman had 33% lower successful conception rates compared to the unvaccinated women. Thus, the information presented indicates fertility effects in both animal data and large human data sets. We do know that, yes, these are indeed fertility destroying injections.

The CDC in the US has found numerous issues related to vaccines. There are high rates of miscarriage, severe prematurity, and birth defects in children. The CDC comments on gynecological side effects, specifically blood clots in the placenta. Babies are being born with clots in their placenta, which may be linked to the vaccine's effects. Placenta analysis often reveals thrombosis, and healthcare professionals have reported finding small clots regularly. Further studies and analysis are needed to fully understand this issue.

Speaker 0 summarizes that days after Bill Gates visits Singapore for a high-level meeting, the government quietly passes a new law granting the power to mandate injections and jail anyone who refuses. The law is laid out in the Infectious Diseases Act. Section 47 states that during any outbreak or even the suspicion of one, the director general of health can order any group of people to undergo vaccination or other prophylaxis. If individuals do not comply, they can be fined up to $20,000 or imprisoned for up to a year. Further, Section 67 ensures no accountability if something goes wrong, with no lawsuits or liability for the health officer, the doctor, or the government. The account notes that this is in Singapore, described as one of the strictest nations on earth, contrasting it with Singapore’s harsh anti-drug stance—public banners warn that possession of even 15 grams of heroin can carry the death penalty, with different penalties for drug offenses depending on age. The speaker then asserts a broader claim: beyond injections, the policy is about what those injections are doing. A new peer-reviewed study from Turkey is cited, claiming that mRNA COVID shots reduced female rats’ egg reserves by up to 60%, described as permanent destruction of primordial follicles, which determine how long a woman can have children. The speaker links this to a wider pattern observed in women, including menstrual disruption, early menopause, infertility, miscarriages, and fetal death, while asserting that no one is allowed to say it. The narration concludes by arguing that if this were any other drug, it would have been withdrawn from the market years ago, but instead the “pop agenda” is being pushed, with the implication that authorities and researchers are doubling down on the policy.

Research purportedly shows vaccinated men's sperm self-assembles into bizarre 3D ribbon-like structures and refuses to swim. Doctors are allegedly warning unvaccinated individuals to avoid sexual intercourse with vaccinated individuals. Demand for unvaxxed sperm reportedly climbed during the pandemic. Dr. Jane Ruby claims vaccinated sperm behaves in unprecedented ways, citing a case where sperm from a vaccinated man formed 3D structures after 30 days in saline. A Danish study allegedly found a 22% decline in motile sperm concentration from 2019-2022. Dr. Christiane Northrop reports vaccinated sperm is allegedly contaminated with nonorganic substances. Fertility clinics are purportedly seeing sperm from vaccinated men that doesn't swim, and eggs from vaccinated women that don't develop properly. An alleged New England Journal of Medicine study purportedly showed an 80% miscarriage rate for vaccinated women in their first trimester. Doctors are supposedly reporting a 79% increase in fetal malformations and unprecedented stillbirths. A study of over 6,000 women allegedly revealed menstrual cycle irregularities, including bleeding in 90-year-olds and hemorrhaging in young girls. Dr. Naomi Rolfe claims Pfizer knew about fetal damage from a document the FDA tried to hide for 75 years. This document allegedly defines exposure to the vaccine as including sexual intercourse between unvaccinated women and vaccinated men, suggesting Pfizer knew vaccinated men's semen could damage pregnancy.

The speaker claims the Shimabukuro study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on 04/21/2021, misrepresented miscarriage rates, reporting 12.6% when raw data allegedly showed 82% in women vaccinated during the first trimester. The speaker alleges conflicts of interest and misrepresentations by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Journal Editor in Chief Eric Rubin in publications intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines. The speaker asserts that subsequent studies claiming vaccine safety during pregnancy are compromised by biased funding, institutional mandates, and threats to medical licenses. Pharmaceutical companies allegedly paid $1,060,000,000 to reviewers at leading medical journals between 2020 and 2022, corrupting the peer review process. Safety signals were allegedly ignored in at least six studies from CDC, FDA, and Pfizer. The speaker states their team published a study on 02/08/2025, identifying 37 adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccines. They cite a study documenting the vaccine traversing the placenta and producing spike protein in the placenta and uterus, and animal studies revealing destruction of ovarian reserve. The speaker urges halting funding to organizations like ACOG and SMFM and ending promotional campaigns for mRNA therapies in pregnant women.

The speaker outlines a series of alarming claims regarding mRNA vaccination and female fertility. They state that in a study involving rats, mRNA-vaccinated subjects exhibited a 60% reduction in primordial (premortial) follicles. The speaker emphasizes that primordial follicles represent a finite resource with no regenerative capacity, noting that women are born with a limited number of these follicles. The implication drawn is that the mRNA shots can reach the ovaries and instruct the ovarian tissue to produce toxic spike protein. According to the speaker, the body's response to this production is to attack the spike protein, leading to tissue damage and destruction of eggs. The destruction of eggs is presented as irreversible, given that primordial follicles do not regenerate, which the speaker asserts has direct consequences for fertility. Further, the speaker cites human data indicating a 33% lower birth rate among vaccinated women, linking this observation to the ovarian damage described in the animal model. They combine these points to argue that a pattern of reduced reproductive capacity is occurring and that this pattern is supported by both the animal study and the human data referenced. The speaker portrays these findings as extraordinarily worrisome and asserts that regulators have failed to address the issue. They argue that regulatory inaction is contributing to what they describe as an ongoing decline in humanity’s fertility. The overarching message is a call for regulatory attention and intervention in response to what they characterize as significant risks to fertility associated with mRNA vaccination. In summary, the speaker claims: - Rats given mRNA vaccines showed a 60% reduction in primordial follicles. - Women are born with a finite, non-regenerating pool of these follicles. - mRNA vaccines purportedly reach the ovaries and cause production of toxic spike protein, provoking an immune attack that damages ovarian tissue and eggs. - This damage allegedly leads to a 33% lower birth rate in vaccinated women, as suggested by cited human data. - The combination of these factors is described as highly concerning and in need of regulatory action, warned against as contributing to a potential future decline in human fertility.

- The speaker notes dated 07/25/2022, reporting on developments related to baby deaths and baby funerals. They reference the UK government website, and specifically Northampton NHS in detail mentioning children's funerals, noting that contracts for this area have appeared that were previously unseen. They point to contractfinderservice.gov.uk and advise looking for “children's and babies' funerals.” They identify several awarded contracts, including one for Hertfordshire, another for Hertfordshire specifically for baby funerals, and contracts awarded for Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS, and Leicester Hospitals NHS. - The speaker mentions that the WNHS is another organization involved for those who do not want to have Mexican arranged funerals, stating that they will do that for you now. - A doctor in Australia, Dr. Luke McClinton, is described as leading the fertility services at the Mater Hospital and as a principal investigator for a series of randomized controlled trials. He is also described as the president of the Australian Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine and is labeled as “the top doctor in Australia in this field.” - The speaker asserts that Dr. Luke McClinton was sacked on Friday for not getting the jab and for attempting to release his data on miscarriages post-vaccination. They state that he has until the following Friday to exit his private practice rooms, as he is no longer allowed to practice in public or private settings. - The speaker claims that Dr. McClinton has been investigating miscarriages in couples post-vaccination and states that the “normal miscarriage rate” is between five and perhaps as high as sixteen percent. They then claim that since the introduction of the vaccine, he has found that seventy-four percent of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages. - The speaker reiterates the statistic: “Seventy four percent of women are having miscarriages who are vaccinated.” They suggest that this statistic would explain why hospitals allegedly want to deal directly with crematoria, with vans taking multiple babies directly to the crematorium, bypassing funeral directors. The speaker emphasizes that they had previously mentioned these points.

The speaker discusses the risks of pregnancy and not giving birth to the child. Pfizer provided important data, revealing that out of 29 specific members in their study, 28 women did not have children. 23 lost their babies within the first 20 weeks, while the remaining 5 experienced stillbirth or fetal death. Only one child survived out of the 29. The speaker also mentions the number of viral particles in the mRNA vaccines, which is 40 trillion. They express concern about the potential harm to the immune system and urge people to stop taking the vaccines.

Fertility clinics report unusual issues with sperm and eggs of vaccinated individuals. A study shows an 80% miscarriage rate in women who received the Pfizer vaccine during pregnancy. Reports of menstrual cycle abnormalities, clotting, and even deaths in young girls are emerging. Concerns about potential long-term fertility effects are raised.

I sincerely apologize for dismissing concerns about menstrual irregularities caused by the Pfizer vaccine. A Pfizer executive confirmed that they were aware of this issue. Pathological specimens showed an excess of spike protein in the ovaries, adrenal gland, myelin, and neuronal cell wall. The spike protein also affects plasminogen activator inhibitor, leading to bleeding and clotting problems. It can cause issues with the lining of the arteries, including the uterine wall. There are at least five mechanisms that could be causing these problems. I have learned that certainty and hubris are the enemy, and we should not discount anything until we have all the data. COVID-19 may also be a factor. The vaccine seems to only deliver the spike protein, not the nucleocapsid protein.

The speaker claims that women who received the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. They state that this is the same miscarriage rate observed in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market analysis.

The Pfizer documents reveal a deliberate effort to harm reproductive health. There are various conditions affecting women's menstrual cycles, such as constant bleeding, two periods a month, or no periods at all. Some women experience agonizing cramps or hemorrhages. The lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines can cross the placenta, leading to compromised placentas in vaccinated mothers. These placentas show calcifications that hinder nourishment and normal growth of the baby. Maternal deaths during childbirth have increased by 40%, resembling a pre-twentieth century situation. The compromised placentas are silvery gray, lack resilience, and result in impaired babies. Fetal malformations and chromosomal aberrations are also being observed. Babies may appear fine at birth but develop respiratory distress within a day.

Speaker claims COVID is a respiratory infection, but Pfizer documents show 'a three sixty degree obsessive focus on ruining human reproduction.' They say researchers studied 'ruining fallopian tubes, ruining ova, ruining placentas, ruining fetuses in utero, ruining the birth process, ruining lactation' and ask, 'Why is that?' They assert lipid nanoparticles 'traverse the placenta' and cause placental calcifications 'which prevent the baby from getting nutrients and oxygen.' They report babies born early because placentas cannot grow normally, and that 'placentas are flat.' They say lipid nanoparticles would go into the baby, 'degrading the Leydig cells and Sertoli cells of baby boys of vaccinated moms,' noting 'Sertoli cells and Leydig cells are the factories of masculinity.' An andrology report allegedly 'confirmed that the injection killed the ants and motility of sperm in men.' Pfizer allegedly warns not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women of childbearing age, 'two reliable forms of contraception.' They state 'two seventy women got pregnant in the study of vaccinated women' and 'two thirty four of them, the records of what happened to that pregnancy were lost,' and 'of the thirty six women who gave birth, over eighty percent of them lost their babies.'

The speaker asserts that the Pfizer documents reveal the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history and that the documents focus specifically on destroying reproduction. They claim that Pfizer knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles and that these nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They contend the deaths of fetuses were due to maternal exposure to the vaccine, described as “maternal exposure quote unquote to the vaccine.” The speaker states that vaccinated women who were nursing their babies were making the babies sick, citing charts showing thousands of babies vomiting, thousands with edema (swollen flesh), and thousands with convulsions. They claim one baby died of multi-organ system failure from nursing vaccinated moms. They further assert that, to this day, in places like the Netherlands and across Europe and the world, vaccinated moms are not being told they can risk their babies’ lives by nursing them. The speaker alleges Pfizer knew these risks and references a section of the Pfizer documents noting an over eighty percent spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate. They further claim Pfizer knows there is something in the semen of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or fetuses, because they warn vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing-age women and to use “two reliable forms of contraception.” They assert that the injection doesn’t stay at the injection site but travels throughout the body within forty-eight hours, accumulating in the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, and the liver, crossing the blood-brain barrier to cause brain-damage-type reactions, and accumulating in the ovaries. They claim it is damaging the hearts of minors and reference FOIA documents from the White House, noting a scramble in April 2021 to cover this up. The speaker concludes that the shots were propagated to parents during that summer and into the next year, advocating for vaccinating minors while knowing they were injuring or killing them. They describe the actions as ongoing dissemination and promotion of vaccination for minors despite the asserted harms.

Speaker 0 explains that even the obstetrics and gynecology association has reportedly pushed to vaccinate pregnant women as a duty, but doctors are the ones who do not know the facts. They reference a highly regarded medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, which published a study claiming a 12.6 percent user rate for the vaccine’s research results. Based on that paper, the 三 富 士 川 学 会 then attempted to vaccinate pregnant women. In reality, among the 827 individuals involved, 700 were in the postpartum period, 127 were in the antepartum period, and initial data were from that group. Specifically, for the group limited to those under twenty weeks (twenty weeks or less), which is 127 people, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. Therefore, the argument is that, going forward, one can see how dangerous the vaccine is from those numbers. The speaker contends that data were hidden and later mixed into the 700-person postpartum group, yielding a miscarriage rate of 12.6 percent. Because of this, the claim is that even a leading medical journal has been influenced by money to publish such conclusions. Overall, the points presented are: - The obstetrics field is described as advocating vaccination of pregnant women as a duty, while physicians allegedly lack awareness of the underlying facts. - The NEJM published a study deemed to show a 12.6 percent user rate, which the speaker implies is problematic. - The 三 富 士 川 学 会 vaccinated pregnant women, but the data show that among 127 women under twenty weeks, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. - The speaker asserts that this information was hidden and later combined with data from the 700 postpartum cases to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate. - The implication is that even a top medical journal can be swayed by financial influence, resulting in biased reporting.

According to the speaker, now that people are getting the documents from the trials, the miscarriage rate was eighty percent in the Pfizer trials, and they knew that. Obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. Kimberly Biss observed disturbing trends in her patients after the COVID-19 genetic vaccines rolled out in 2021. She noticed her miscarriage rate from year to year had gone up by a hundred percent. She began tracking and comparing her data in real time and published her findings on doctor Jessica Rose's substack in 2022. The speaker also claims that a lot of medical schools, 50 to 60% of their money probably comes from big pharma.

Speaker 0: The speaker acknowledges the topic as real, noting initial skepticism and later personal evolution on the issue. Speaker 1: Describes early vaccine rollout with social media noise, driven by women reporting sudden menstrual abnormalities after years of regular cycles. They noticed cycles off, heavy bleeding, missed periods, and painful periods after vaccination, though they themselves had not been vaccinated. Social media groups formed, including a website called My Cycle Story where women shared experiences. When fact-checkers and deplatforming followed, the speaker and others remained skeptical but curious, eventually turning to scientific research. The first patient treated was in March 2021, a woman who had seen a massage therapist who had been boosted the day before. That night she missed her period within two days, had tender, swollen breasts, cramping, and had been very regular for about twenty years; she was about 43 and described the change as totally abnormal, linking it to the close exposure to the massage therapist. The speaker initially believed ivermectin binds spike and thought shedding might be possible, so the patient was placed on ivermectin, after which her period returned within five days, though she remained uncomfortable and continued to have an irregular cycle. This is cited as the first anecdote. Speaker 1: After opening their practice, the speaker and their partner began seeing these phenomena in their patients, including some who were vaccine-injured. They challenge the notion that shedding affects only the unvaccinated or anti-vaxxers, noting vaccine-injured patients who are sensitive to exposure to other vaccinated individuals. They observed that shedding phenomena occur in a small cohort who are sensitive to environmental or pharmacological factors. They describe shedding as very common, though the degree to which it affects others is variable. Their best current insight, after extensive research and discussions with other clinicians, is that shedding tends to happen to people who are environmentally or pharmacologically sensitive—those who have allergies or difficulty handling pharmaceuticals and environmental exposures. They suggest there is a broader cohort that is sensitive but not always aware of what is happening. In summary, shedding is not limited to unvaccinated individuals, and a small, highly sensitive group may be more affected, while many people remain unaffected.

A spreadsheet showing tens of thousands of women allegedly damaged menstrually by the injection was created. According to the speaker, the spreadsheet showed 15,000 women bleeding every day, 10,000 bleeding twice a month, and 7,500 with no periods at all. The speaker claims 10-year-old girls bled upon injection, and 85-year-old women bled. The speaker states this chart went to the White House, Dr. Walensky, the FDA, POTUS, and 15 White House staffers on 04/20/2021. Three days later, Dr. Walensky allegedly told women there's no bad time to get the Pfizer or COVID injection before, during, or after pregnancy. The speaker claims that while Pfizer's trials proved the shot destroyed women's menstrual cycles, they were simultaneously developing a product for women with excessive menstrual bleeding. This product was allegedly rolled out one month after the report went to the White House.

Recent reports from fertility clinics indicate alarming issues with the reproductive health of vaccinated individuals. Men’s sperm is reportedly not swimming, and women’s eggs are not developing into embryos, with many contaminated by non-organic substances. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine revealed an 80% miscarriage rate among vaccinated women in early pregnancy, significantly higher than the baseline rate. Additionally, there is a noted 79% increase in fetal malformations and unprecedented stillbirths. A database of over 6,000 women highlighted severe menstrual irregularities, including cases of extreme bleeding and decidual cast shedding. Concerns grow that many young women may face infertility due to vaccination, leading to unimaginable consequences.

The speaker claims the Pfizer documents reveal the "greatest crime against humanity in recorded history," with a specific focus on destroying reproduction, indicating a depopulation agenda. They assert Pfizer knew lipid nanoparticles were blocking women's ovaries and traversing the placenta, determining fetal deaths were due to maternal vaccine exposure. The speaker alleges Pfizer knew vaccinated nursing mothers were making babies sick, citing charts showing thousands of babies experiencing vomiting, edema, and convulsions, with one death from multi-organ system failure. They claim no one is warning vaccinated mothers about the risks to their babies. According to the speaker, Pfizer documents show over an 80% spontaneous abortion/miscarriage rate and warn vaccinated men to avoid intercourse with women of childbearing age or use two forms of contraception. The speaker states Pfizer knew the injection travels throughout the body, accumulating in various organs including the ovaries, and damaging the hearts of minors. They claim lawyers have FOIA documents showing a White House scramble in April 2021 to cover this up.

Research from Basel, Switzerland shows that 5 to 9% of people in a study experienced cardiac harm from the vaccine, resulting in 50,000 to 90,000 cases of heart damage per million citizens. If someone develops myocarditis, there is a 75% chance of death within 10 years. Menstrual abnormalities, infertility, and aggressive cancers are also spreading among the vaccinated population. This is all part of a big lie perpetuated by multiple agencies. We need to consider the health and fertility of our nation as a patient in the emergency room.

Research from Basel, Switzerland shows that 5 to 9% of people in a study experienced cardiac harm from the vaccine, resulting in 50,000 to 90,000 cases of heart damage per million citizens. If someone develops myocarditis, there is a 75% chance of death within 10 years or the need for a transplant. Menstrual abnormalities, fertility issues, and aggressive cancers are also spreading among the vaccinated population. This is all part of a big lie perpetuated by multiple agencies. We need to consider the health and fertility of our nation as a patient in the emergency room.

Pregnant women who received COVID-19 shots experienced concerning effects, according to maternal fetal medicine expert Dr. Against Thorpe. The shots quickly spread throughout the body, crossing barriers like the placenta and blood-brain barriers in both the mother and fetus. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots led to more adverse events in women of reproductive age. Data showed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and over twice the risk of negative fetal outcomes across six categories. Additionally, birth rates in several European countries dropped significantly after widespread COVID-19 vaccination. As a result, researchers are urging the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for individuals of childbearing and reproductive age.

Dr. Biss, an experienced OBGYN, discusses the potential effects of COVID-19 vaccines on women's reproductive health. He mentions that there have been reports of changes in menstrual cycles and postmenopausal bleeding in vaccinated women. Some women experienced a condition called passing a decidual cast, where the uterine lining sheds all at once, causing intense pain and hemorrhaging. Dr. Biss also notes that premature ovarian failure and abnormal bleeding patterns were observed in some women who received the vaccine early in their menstrual cycle. Regarding miscarriages, Dr. Biss shares that his practice saw an increase in miscarriage rates in vaccinated patients, but it is challenging to determine the exact correlation between vaccines and miscarriages due to limited data. The majority of his patients received the Pfizer vaccine.

The speakers discuss the potential impact of COVID vaccines on reproductive health. One speaker references Naomi Wolf's claim that boys were "neutered in utero" when their mothers were vaccinated, based on Pfizer's reporting. Another speaker claims that female vaccines wipe out about 60% of eggs, which is brutal. For men, the vaccines drop sperm count and motility significantly for about six months, but that rebounds. The vaccines raise the rates of miscarriages, stillbirth, premature delivery. Maternal mortality is at a record high, and it is almost certainly among the vaccinated. A former Danish public health official, Bibiki Managy, found that global fertility plunged around December 2021, about nine months after the vaccines rolled out. The speakers suggest that vaccines may affect the process of forming eggs or oocytes in young girls. Menstrual periods are disturbed, and the whole cycle is thrown off. COVID vaccines actually cause autistic behaviors in mice.