reSee.it - Related Video Feed

John Kennedy believed the CIA's purpose was to create new wars. Eisenhower warned against the military-industrial complex. Two months into his presidency, the military and intelligence asked Kennedy to invade Cuba, claiming it would trigger a revolution. Kennedy refused to use the US military. When the invasion failed, they asked him to send in the military, but he refused again, realizing he was being tricked. Kennedy wanted to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces. He resisted military and intelligence pressure to enter Laos and Vietnam, limiting involvement in Vietnam to 16,000 military advisors. In October 1963, after learning 75 Americans had died in Vietnam, Kennedy ordered a total troop withdrawal. A month later, he was killed.

Former President Dwight D. Eisenhower delivers a farewell speech warning about the influence of the military-industrial complex. The speech was initially thought to be written by a speechwriter, but recently discovered documents reveal that Eisenhower's brother, Milton, played a significant role in drafting it. Eisenhower expresses concern about the growing power of the military and the arms industry, urging citizens to be vigilant and ensure the proper balance between defense and peaceful goals. The speech emphasizes the need for an informed and knowledgeable citizenry to prevent the combination of military and industrial power from endangering democracy and liberty. The video also discusses President Kennedy's assassination and former President Truman's call to abolish the CIA.

In his farewell address, President Eisenhower warned about the military-industrial complex and the risks of misplaced power. Now, decades later, there is growing concern about the emergence of a tech industrial complex, which could present significant dangers for our country.

President Eisenhower warned us against the emerging military industrial complex that would turn us into an imperium. My uncle's thousand days in office were a constant fight to keep the country out of war. They tried to trick him into the Bay of Pigs invasion, but he refused to send in the military. He realized he'd been tricked and later fired those involved in the deception. They tried to get him to invade Laos, Cuba, and Berlin, but he wouldn't. In Vietnam, he only sent advisors, but when he found out about the casualties, he ordered everyone home. Thirty days after signing that order, he was murdered. Johnson then reversed the order and sent in troops. These traumas, including my uncle's death, pushed us down the road Eisenhower warned against. Today, we are the military industrial complex, and nobody believes their voices are heard in Washington. To go back to our original idealism, we must look at the original trauma and expose what happened to my uncle.

John F. Kennedy opposed Israel having nuclear weapons and planned to inspect their facilities. However, he was assassinated and Lyndon Johnson allowed Israel to proceed with their nuclear program in 1968. This decision was kept secret from the American public. Kennedy's stance against giving Israel nuclear weapons was seen as sensible, as he believed it should be limited to the first five countries that obtained it. Johnson's support for Israel despite their lack of assistance in the Middle East caused resentment. Kennedy's assassination was seen as a deliberate act to prevent the changes he would have brought, as he opposed colonialism and viewed Israel as an apartheid state.

In his 1961 farewell address, President Eisenhower warned against the undue influence of the military-industrial complex. John F. Kennedy's narrow 1960 election victory ushered in a new era, but he inherited the CIA's secret war in Cuba, culminating in the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion. The Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Amidst these crises, Kennedy's administration also grappled with conflicts in Laos and Vietnam. He publicly advocated for peace, urging a re-evaluation of relations with the Soviet Union, emphasizing our shared humanity and the need for a peace not enforced by American might.

President Kennedy's assassination remains a hotly debated topic. While the official Warren Commission concluded Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, evidence suggests a more complex narrative. Many eyewitnesses reported shots coming from the front, contradicting Oswald's position. The rushed investigation and immediate pronouncements by President Johnson and FBI Director Hoover to quell any notion of conspiracy raise serious questions. The CIA actively discredited those questioning the official story, labeling them "conspiracy theorists." Kennedy's shifting stance on the Cold War and his growing conflict with the military and intelligence agencies further fuel ongoing debate about his death. The lack of accountability for those behind Kennedy's murder casts a long shadow over US foreign policy.

Threats constantly arise, and our military must be ready to deter aggression. Our military establishment has changed significantly since World War II and Korea. We now have a permanent armaments industry and 3.5 million people working in defense. The economic, political, and spiritual influence of this military-industrial complex is felt everywhere. While we recognize its importance, we must also understand its implications. We must guard against unwarranted influence by the military-industrial complex and ensure it doesn't endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We cannot take anything for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can ensure that our industrial and military machinery aligns with our peaceful goals for security and liberty to thrive.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and order the main claims and their sequence. - Preserve key facts, dates, and figures mentioned. - Highlight unique or unexpected details (e.g., CIA memo and term origin). - Exclude filler, repetition, and off-topic material. - Translate only if needed (transcript is in English); present in English. - Avoid adding personal judgments or external context; present claims as stated. - Aim for a concise, cohesive 377–472 word summary capturing essential points and conclusions. In 1964, president Lyndon B. Johnson claimed that a US ship called the USS Maddox had been attacked by North Vietnamese forces in the Gulf of Tonkin, but the second attack never happened; it was a complete fabrication. Yet Congress passed the Gulf Of Tonkin Resolution, effectively giving Johnson a blank check to escalate the war in Vietnam. By 1968, over half a million US troops were in Vietnam, with carpet bombing of villages and the spraying of chemical weapons like Agent Orange, and millions of Vietnamese citizens affected, all described as based on a lie. After France lost its colonial war in Vietnam, the US stepped in, ignored international agreements, and installed a dictator in the South. He was so corrupt and brutal that even the Vietnamese people hated him. When nationwide elections were planned to unify the country, Ho Chi Minh was guaranteed to win, but the US backed out and canceled democracy. So, the US didn’t just join the Vietnam War; it escalated, provoked, and manipulated its way into it. As thousands of soldiers died and anti-war protests surged in the US, people asked questions about the rationale for Vietnam, why the poor were drafted while the rich received deferments, and why the government lied about the Gulf of Tonkin. The CIA was not about to lose that narrative. In 1967, they wrote a classified memo, CIA dispatch number 1035-960, a propaganda guide sent to journalists and foreign operatives on how to quietly discredit critics, especially when questions arose around JFK. This memo labeled those questions as conspiracy theorists because that term didn’t exist before then. The memo was weaponized to shame critical thinkers, equating questioning the government with being unhinged or batshit crazy. It worked: the Vietnam War escalated with a provable lie sustained by media propaganda and shielded by a weaponized insult that’s still used today. Conspiracy theorists at the time didn’t mean crazy; they were people who weren’t buying the government’s story, and many of those critics were right. So when someone says the government would never do that, remember that it did, and they created a stigma to silence dissent. And if you think this is crazy, consider what happened in Panama. Follow for more deep dives. They don’t want you to know.

This video discusses the challenges faced by American presidents in implementing changes within the military and intelligence sectors. It highlights that since Kennedy, no president has been successful in making significant changes in these areas. Kennedy's attempts to cut the CIA budget and make reforms were reversed by Lyndon Johnson, who undid most of Kennedy's initiatives, except for civil rights. This includes reversing aid for progress in South America, African initiatives, and Indonesia initiatives. The video emphasizes the untouchable nature of these government agencies and their consistently uncut budgets.

The speakers discuss false flag operations, such as the Gulf of Tonkin, where they claim attacks were faked to initiate war. They mention Operation Northwoods, allegedly designed to provoke war with Cuba, but stopped by Kennedy. The Bay of Pigs is cited as a turning point where Kennedy realized he couldn't rely on the intelligence community and wanted to dismantle and rebuild it. Eisenhower had warned Kennedy to watch out for the CIA. Eisenhower's farewell address cautioned against the military-industrial complex, claiming that making war profitable leads to more war, a departure from America's traditionally defensive military. One speaker states that profit is where the devil does his best work.

In his farewell address, the speaker warns about the dangers of the military industrial complex, a vast armaments industry that has significant influence in economic, political, and spiritual aspects of society. He emphasizes the need to guard against unwarranted influence and the potential rise of misplaced power. This warning is considered one of the most profound statements made by an American president. The speaker's message is similar to George Washington's warning against foreign entanglements. He urges the protection of our liberties and democratic values from the weight of this combination.

On JFK’s inauguration day, 48% of all State Department political-section employees were not actually State Department employees at all; they were CIA operatives under diplomatic cover. While parked at a US embassy, they did not answer within the State Department chain of command and acted as covert operatives for organized political warfare conducted by the CIA. Because they dominated the political section, they could set their own political policy for the country. If the State Department did not want to overthrow a regime but the CIA did, the CIA could use the embassy’s political-section bandwidth to contact dissident groups, run money to them, provide logistical support, connect them, and run a parallel operation without observing the White House National Security Council chain of command. The speaker gave examples where in some embassies 80% of the political affairs staff were CIA, not State Department at all. The speaker then notes Joe Biden’s CIA director as Bill Burns, describing Burns as a buddy of Jeffrey Epstein. It is asserted that in the 1990s Burns was the head of the political section for the US embassy in Russia, and that Burns “never worked a day at the CIA in his whole life before he’d be handed the reins to be the CIA director.” The speaker emphasizes that Burns was a State Department figure the whole time, serving as the head of the political affairs section, and questions where he was positioned “at state” when he was the head of the political affairs section.

The speaker lays out a narrative in which Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, is intricately connected to the CIA and to a longtime insider, James Angleton. The claim is that Mossad and Angleton formed an alliance “forever,” with Angleton described as “the mole” who was aligned with Mossad. In 1960, Angleton was the head of the CIA’s Directorate of Foreign Intelligence, and he is depicted as the person who was always searching for a Russian mole. The speaker asserts that Angleton was effectively the Russian mole because of his close friendship with Mossad, to the extent that he would share information with Mossad and Mossad would not relay it to Russia. The narrative then moves to 1963, referencing David Ben-Gurion, the Israeli prime minister, arguing that Israel decided to kill John F. Kennedy. The speaker quotes Ben-Gurion as saying that Kennedy’s threats of inspections of “demonic” (interpreted as a mispronunciation or coded term for dangerous issues) were unacceptable, and that Ben-Gurion said, “It’s none of his frigging business. I don’t wanna hear anymore from Kennedy. You kill him.” According to the speaker, Ben-Gurion issued this order to Mossad and then resigned so he could not be held responsible for it. The implication is that Mossad then went to Angleton, implying that the Kennedy assassination was not a CIA job, but was “greased by the CIA” because Angleton had his connections at Mossad. From there, the speaker claims that Corsican sharpshooters were hired by Mossad for the Kennedy assassination as part of a larger operation at Dealey Plaza, including the escape. The speaker asserts that public suspicion has misattributed the blame to the mob, Lyndon Johnson, or Castro, but maintains that it was Israel that carried it out. The stated motive is tied to Israel’s desire to avoid further inspections related to their nuclear program. The speaker claims this is connected to Israel’s nuclear and biological capabilities and asserts that plutonium was stolen from the United States to support their program. In summary, the speaker contends that the Kennedy assassination was orchestrated not by the CIA alone, but through a coordinated effort involving Mossad, James Angleton, and David Ben-Gurion, with Israel acting to prevent scrutiny of its nuclear activities by eliminating Kennedy, aided by Corsican shooters and a CIA-Mossad alliance.

We spoke to someone with access to hidden CIA documents about their involvement in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The response was clear: yes, the CIA was involved. This revelation suggests that there are powerful forces within the U.S. government that operate beyond democratic control, capable of influencing elections and concealing their actions, including the murder of a president. This undermines the very concept of democracy. Trust in the government has declined since Kennedy's assassination, and those in the know, including every CIA director since 1963, have been aware of this troubling reality.

John F. Kennedy opposed Israel having nuclear weapons and was planning to inspect their facilities. However, he was assassinated and Lyndon Johnson allowed Israel to proceed with their nuclear program. The American public was kept in the dark about this. Kennedy was the last president who made sense and believed that the bomb should not be given to Israel. Johnson secretly supported Israel, despite them not being helpful in the Middle East. Kennedy's assassination was seen as a way to prevent the change he represented. Israel is seen as an apartheid state, practicing a form of colonialism.

It's not just blackmail or bribery that makes people obey, but also the threat of violence. Every US president has been threatened with violence implicitly because of the murder of John F. Kennedy. Presidents understand the outlines of what happened, but no one has released all the files. The message is clear: if you get too far outside the boundaries, you could wind up like JFK. The forces that murdered the sitting president in 1963 probably placed those boundaries.

The hidden CIA documents suggest the CIA's involvement in JFK's assassination. This revelation implies a government within a government, undermining democracy. The public's trust in the government has eroded over the years, with even former CIA directors implicated.

Dark clouds of political crisis loomed over America after the assassination of President Kennedy. In the aftermath, the nation looked to Gerald Ford and a select few to make sense of the chaos. While conspiracy theories abound, the Warren Commission report remains the definitive account of this tragedy. This is largely due to Ford's involvement, as he was a respected figure in the nation.

Good evening. After Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald, many Americans questioned the official narrative of the Kennedy assassination. The Warren Commission concluded that both acted alone, but doubts persisted. The term "conspiracy theory" emerged in 1964 as skepticism grew. Psychiatrist Louis Joylan West, who assessed Ruby, was a CIA contractor involved in mind control programs, raising further questions about his motives. A 1976 House committee suggested a conspiracy in Kennedy's murder, with the CIA as a prime suspect. Despite laws mandating document disclosure, recent administrations have withheld thousands of pages. A source with access to these documents claimed the CIA was involved in the assassination. This suggests a powerful, unaccountable force within the government, undermining democratic control. Trust in government has eroded since Kennedy's death, and many key figures have been aware of this troubling reality.

The military industrial complex used to consist of many companies, but it has consolidated to just five giant companies. These companies, like Raytheon and Northrop Grumman, often overcharge the Department of Defense for weapons and make excessive profits. For example, a missile that used to cost $25,000 now costs $400,000. Kathy, the director of Northrop Grumman, is also involved with a non-profit organization for empowering women, but the board is mostly run by men and includes CEOs from major corporations. Kathy herself earns around $20 million per year, including salary, bonuses, and stock awards. While I'm not claiming a conspiracy, it's clear that the military industrial complex is making a lot of money.

My uncle, President Kennedy, resisted pressure from the military and intelligence to start wars, including the invasion of Cuba. He refused to send combat troops to Vietnam, only allowing military advisers. After learning of American casualties, he ordered all troops out of Vietnam, but tragically, he was assassinated a month later. Kennedy's presidency was marked by his conflict with the military and intelligence apparatus, culminating in his efforts to end US involvement in Vietnam.

Uncle John Kennedy understood the CIA's purpose was to create new wars. Eisenhower warned against the military-industrial complex. Two months after his inauguration, the military and intelligence approached Kennedy about invading Cuba, but he refused, stating the U.S. shouldn't dictate other countries' governments. Despite Kennedy's refusal to use the U.S. military, the Bay of Pigs invasion proceeded. When the operation failed and military intervention was requested, Kennedy again refused, realizing he had been deceived. He then wanted to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces. During his presidency, Kennedy resisted military and intelligence pressures to enter Laos and Vietnam. He sent military advisors to Vietnam but refused to deploy 250,000 combat troops. After learning that 75 Americans had died, Kennedy ordered all U.S. troops out of Vietnam in October 1963. A month later, he was killed.

Kennedy called for budget cuts to military installations and wanted to end the Cold War, cooperate with the Soviets on the moon race, ban nuclear testing, avoid invading Cuba, and withdraw from Vietnam. By 1961, some knew Kennedy wouldn't escalate war in Southeast Asia. Kennedy told McNamara he would pull advisors from Vietnam, angering some who felt betrayed after Laos. Kennedy questioned why the US should go into Vietnam if Cuba was too close, leading to conflict. Defense spending was escalating, with projections of nearly $200 billion spent since the war began. The Kennedy brothers allegedly targeted voting districts with defense contracts to influence the '64 election. Some wanted to control intelligence from Saigon and manage McNamara's influence on Kennedy. The plan may have started with conversations among defense contractors, big oil bankers, and military officers. The goal was to create a plan, likely in the South, with no direct orders or written evidence, ensuring plausible deniability. The operation had to succeed, regardless of the cost, with perpetrators protected from prosecution. This was described as a coup d'etat.

Following the Bay of Pigs in 1961, JFK and the CIA were at war. JFK advisor Arthur Schlesinger wrote a memo detailing the CIA's covert actions and paramilitary warfare. Kennedy was preparing for a major shakeup of the CIA. JFK fired Alan Dulles, the head of the CIA. Kennedy also went after how the CIA financed their operations. The International Cooperation Administration (ICA) was the financial arm that funded foreign assistance and non-military security programs. It was accused of being a CIA cutout. The ICA was replaced by USAID. Questioning history is important, and one should always ask questions and question everything.