reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 expresses their opinion about eating at Carrefour and accuses the government of being influenced by the Rothschild bank. They believe that Emmanuel Macron, who used to work for Rothschild, is serving their interests. The speaker questions the government's motives and suggests that everyone already knows the truth.

In 2010, Nicolas Sarkozy signed a law to liberalize the market due to pressure from the European Commission, which threatened France with a €20 billion fine for unfair competition because of its low electricity prices. As a result, an artificial market was created with 125 alternative suppliers. This has led to EDF accumulating €64 billion in debt. The speaker argues that this system is unsustainable, as the main competitor sells its production at the same price to all its rivals without going bankrupt. They suggest removing these alternative suppliers to stop the increasing costs for consumers.

The speaker accuses the Gates Foundation of making millions of dollars from vaccines and then changing their narrative about their effectiveness. They criticize Bill Gates for profiting from lies and question his philanthropic image. The speaker also highlights Gates' history as a businessman and suggests that he lacks the expertise to advocate for medical interventions. They find it shocking how transparent the situation is, with no attempt to hide the financial motivations involved.

EDF is facing financial difficulties, so the speaker supports its renationalization. They believe that privatization should only happen when a company is doing well. The speaker also wants EDF to merge with Enedis and disconnect from the European market's pricing system, which is causing small businesses to struggle. They mention petitions signed by thousands of entrepreneurs who are struggling financially. The speaker emphasizes that this issue is important and calls for support. They give examples of companies like Michelin, whose electricity bills have skyrocketed, and warn that if the situation continues, companies may relocate outside of France. The speaker points out that Spain and Portugal have disconnected from the pricing system and have reasonable electricity prices.

Speaker 0 accuses Mr. Trudeau of selling out Canada to globalism and working for his globalist partners instead of the country. The speaker questions how much Mr. Trudeau is being paid to betray Canada and suggests that traitors used to be hanged for treason. The speaker mentions that they know what Mr. Trudeau is doing and brings up the topic of oil.

In this video, the speaker discusses the energy crisis in France and its connection to Germany. They claim that Germany has declared an economic war against France by promoting wind and gas energy to undermine the French nuclear system. They highlight the role of lobbyists and politicians in this process, accusing them of betraying national interests. The speaker also mentions the infiltration of Greenpeace and WWF into French institutions, further exacerbating the situation. They argue that the French government has been naive and calls for action to address this issue. The speaker dismisses the government's claims that the crisis is due to the conflict in Ukraine and EDF's maintenance failures. They emphasize the need for a comprehensive investigation into these matters.

The speaker claims that Pierre Polyev, leader of the Conservative Party, which they equate to the Republican Party in the US, is a fraud. They state that the Conservative Party is conservative in name only. The speaker describes Polyev as a "sinister fraud."

The speaker discusses the loyalty project and its connection to Brussels. They explain that Brussels has no legitimacy in this matter and that they use the queen to pass through the regulated access to historical nuclear energy. This access requires EDF to sell energy to its competitors at a fixed price of 42 euros per terawatt-hour, which has not been changed since 2011. The speaker argues that this price is now suicidal for EDF and that if they want to change it, they must get approval from the commission. The speaker criticizes this process as mafia-like and emphasizes that if EDF wants to increase the price, they must dismantle. They also express frustration with the claim that these people are liberals, as selling energy at market prices would solve many issues.

I apologize, Mr. President, but I cannot stay silent. You have broken regulated energy tariffs, liberalized the market, and created a system that demands EDF to give 25% of nuclear energy funds to its competitors. Twelve years later, they haven't invested a single euro. During the lockdown, when the free market dropped to 21 euros, they all went to court to exit. But when the market went above 40 euros after the lockdown, they came back demanding more volume. This is not consumer protection; it's organized exploitation. The CRE estimated that over 60% of regulated tariff increases were driven by alternative actors wanting to compete with EDF. This system has been exploiting EDF for 12 years, and you continue to support it. They don't even respect the contract, yet you give them more. They are sharks, always ready to feast on others' expense.

We are not in trouble because of a lack of energy or amateurs. We need to talk about things. These people are great, but they are inexperienced. Macron has been here for 6 years and didn't think about all this before. We are dependent now, whereas France used to be a leader in electricity. We had the strongest nuclear potential in the world and could export electricity. But now we are begging because we followed Germany's lead. This is not Europe, it's German Europe. The Franco-German relationship is a disaster for France. We need to break free from this imperialism.

The speaker discusses how the French government is subsidizing the electricity market instead of decoupling it from financial markets. They argue that this decision will have terrible consequences for the country's electricity production and market. The solution proposed is the complete nationalization of EDF and reinvestment in the energy mix. The speaker also suggests the idea of socializing the use of pallet fires as a way to cope with the situation. They encourage viewers to share this information to resist government propaganda and defend their interests. The speaker thanks the Socialize Energy Collective for their support and mentions their goal of advocating for the nationalization of EDF.

The speaker raises concerns about the high price of electricity for French entrepreneurs. Despite France producing nuclear electricity at a cost of fifty euros per megawatt-hour, businesses are forced to pay six to seven hundred euros per megawatt-hour. This is due to an absurd European market that links electricity prices to gas prices. The speaker blames Mr. Putin for creating a gas crisis in Europe and accuses Europe of inventing an electricity crisis. Many French businesses, including bakeries and industrial companies, are struggling and some are even closing down. The speaker questions why France cannot achieve lower electricity prices like Spain and Portugal, where prices are below two hundred euros. The speaker urges the government to take urgent measures to support French businesses.

The speaker discusses the issue of electricity prices in France, highlighting how a portion of electricity is sold to a company at 42 euros and then resold to bakers, butchers, and small businesses at much higher prices, sometimes up to 1000 euros per megawatt. The speaker mentions that the profit goes to these companies, but the government also takes a share above 180 euros. This difference in prices between France, Spain, and Portugal benefits the oligarchs and the state budget. The speaker considers this situation to be a major scandal and mentions raising the issue in the National Assembly to put pressure on the government and spread awareness through a video.

The speaker criticizes the lack of energy and amateurism in France's leadership. They mention that France used to be a leader in electricity production but now relies on other countries. They blame this on following Germany's lead and call it an "idiotic Franco-German couple" where France is the cuckold. The speaker urges France to break free from this imperialism.

The speaker discusses the mayor's losses in battles and mentions the nuclear and European issues. They highlight two disasters caused by Europe: the tariff arena and the proposed EDF dismantlement known as Hercule. The speaker argues against the regulated tariff and explains its impact on EDF's competitiveness. They also mention the negative consequences of the Hercule project. The conversation revolves around the mayor's stance on these issues.

In this segment, the speaker argues against the idea that exiting the eurozone or the European Union would automatically sever access to the internal market, labeling such fears as fundamentally incorrect. The speaker references a position previously outlined in a Welt article from 2016, stating that every country within the EU should be allowed to leave the EU and automatically fall into the internal market, so that the free internal market continues to guarantee the fundamental freedoms between EU countries. The overarching objective presented is the creation of a European Economic Area, but the speaker rejects what is described as a “monstrous overbuild” currently practiced, characterized by tens of thousands of civil servants who are deemed unnecessary and overpaid, with a level of intrusion that is viewed as excessive. The speaker then shifts to a critique of the current leadership and policies, urging the removal of those in power within the EU framework, specifically naming Ursula von der Leyen and the policies associated with her tenure. The cited policy areas include a ban on combustion engines, CO2-related levies, heating laws, and building energy policy, among others. The demand is to “throw out” these people, as they are viewed as representative of an overreaching EU apparatus that the speaker does not support. The central message is that such a centralized and intrusive EU structure is unnecessary and undesirable. The text emphasizes the need for a free internal market among European nations, paired with the restoration of national sovereignty and secure borders. The speaker advocates for free exchange of goods and services among nations, suggesting that this approach would constitute real progress. The concluding sentiment reinforces a preference for smaller, less intrusive governance and a streamlined framework that prioritizes the free movement of goods and services within a European context, while maintaining secure borders and national autonomy. The overall call is for scrapping what is described as the EU apparatus, empowering nations to engage in open trade and cooperation without the perceived rigidity and overreach of the current EU system.

The speaker criticizes the Queen as a scandal that was created in 2010. They argue that the Queen represents a combination of liberal ideology and European regulations, which led to EDF's loss in the electricity market. The speaker mentions that the market was opened up to speculators who bought electricity at a lower price and resold it at a higher price, profiting from the difference. They highlight the lack of action taken to address this issue, attributing it to pressure from European regulations and the failure of operators to fulfill their obligations. The speaker suggests the need for an investigation into the actions of these operators and why they were not penalized for their failures.

EDF produces 80% of the electricity in France, and their winter production is almost sufficient. There is no need to buy electricity from intermediaries or the market. The government's decision to maintain these laws is creating a major energy crisis in France. We could have been one of the few European countries to withstand sanctions, but now we might sink like the others. The solution is to reestablish EDF's monopoly so that everyone buys electricity directly from them. This should have been done years ago, especially when sanctions were imposed on Russia. The government's failure to anticipate the price surge proves their incompetence in managing our interests. They cannot blame Putin; it is their fault.

The atmosphere in the European Parliament is tense. Many colleagues are realizing they are not serving the people's best interests. It's no longer about the people, but about a global elite. They are starting to see that the public is no longer fooled by climate change rhetoric and are standing up against it.

Europe's energy crisis stems from allowing a 16-year-old girl to dictate energy policy, shaming the continent away from nuclear energy and hindering energy independence. This placed Europe in a fragile position, now worsened by the lack of Russian energy. The speaker claims that both a 16-year-old girl "who knew nothing" and a president whose language turned people off contributed to the crisis. The speaker asserts that Trump was right about German and European reliance on Russian gas, despite the German delegation "snickering" at his warnings. The speaker suggests that the eagerness to judge Trump's delivery led to embracing a 16-year-old with no scientific or technological background to dictate energy policy. The speaker reminds the audience that she was nominated for a Nobel Prize.

In this video, the speaker discusses the cost of electricity production in France. They mention that nuclear and hydroelectric power cost around 30 euros per megawatt-hour, but on certain market days, the price can reach as high as 9,987 euros. The speaker questions why the price of electricity can increase by a factor of 100, while in the oil industry, it only increases by a factor of 10. They suggest that economists, politicians, and technicians should address this issue and explain why such a significant price difference exists. The speaker also criticizes the presence of "parasitic" suppliers in the electricity market who do not contribute to production, transportation, or distribution.

The video discusses the recent increase in electricity prices in France and the debate surrounding whether the country should exit the European electricity market. The speakers argue that the price hike is artificial and that the government should prioritize protecting French businesses and households. They criticize the lack of a European energy policy and highlight the potential risks of remaining in the market, such as potential electricity shortages. The speakers also mention the inconsistency between promoting electric vehicles while electricity prices continue to rise. They call for a reform of the electricity market and a return to regulated tariffs.

The speaker criticizes the EU for using crises to expand power, like with the Green Deal and digital identity. They warn of a move towards a centralized, controlling economy, likening it to a new form of communism led by technocrats. Drawing parallels to Stalin and Mao's actions, they question if the EU truly improves people's lives.

In France, the speaker explains that the country operates under a neoliberal system rather than a liberal one. They argue that when financiers cannot win through competition, the government intervenes to manipulate the market so that the financiers always come out on top. This is what will happen with EDF, as the state has mandated that EDF must sell 25% of its production to private suppliers at a cost price of €49 per megawatt-hour. This means that EDF will lose 25% of its profits, allowing private companies to add their margins and make a profit. However, these profits will not be used to maintain the nuclear power plants. The speaker questions why EDF didn't use its existing profits to invest in renewable energy instead. They argue that most of these private suppliers rely on the cheap electricity they obtain from EDF rather than investing in renewables themselves. The speaker clarifies that it is still EDF producing the electricity, but they issue fake ownership titles to private suppliers who then sell it back to consumers at a higher price.

The speaker criticizes the European Commission, calling them "Talibans of the law" and "dogmatic extremists" on competition policy. They argue that France should prioritize its national interest and keep its dams, dismissing any interference from the Commission. When asked about the queen, the speaker suggests removing her, questioning the Commission's authority and dismissing any potential consequences. They emphasize the need to protect France's national interest and oppose any infringements. The speaker concludes by urging moderation and calm in the face of excesses.