reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Kamala's campaign is facing serious issues, having spent $1 million on celebrity endorsements and concerts without gaining any votes, leading to a $20 million debt. Donors were misled about the campaign's viability, believing it was competitive. Internal staff felt mistreated and were hesitant to voice concerns. Despite missing fundraising goals, Kamala remained unaware of the campaign's financial troubles. She spent lavishly on events, including $500,000 for a stunt in Vegas, while losing significantly in key states. Now in debt and seeking funds for a recount after losing by 3 million votes, the party is hesitant to contribute more. Donald Trump has offered assistance, suggesting party unity and leveraging remaining campaign funds effectively.

Kamala Harris had a rally in Atlanta with Megan Thee Stallion to boost attendance. Fulton County allegedly buses in homeless people for events to make them look full. This tactic is not unique to Harris, as it has been rumored to happen during elections as well. The rally may not accurately reflect true support for Harris.

I have love and respect for Quavo as an artist. It's sad to see him taking money to support Kamala Harris. Megan Thee Stallion and Quavo likely got paid to attend an event. It's disappointing. If Trump did the same, people would be upset.

J. Lo's candidate lost, which is satisfying given how celebrities try to influence our votes. J. Lo's expertise seems limited to failed marriages, and Meryl Streep's political insights have proven misguided, like her past comments on Harvey Weinstein. Oprah, who charges a million dollars for interviews, also didn't help Kamala Harris's campaign. Harris herself has been criticized for her inauthenticity, pretending to be relatable and competent while failing to address her role as the border czar. Her various accents, including a fake Jamaican one, have only added to the perception of her insincerity. Ultimately, the election was called for Donald Trump around 1:22 AM, marking a significant moment for the opposition.

There is a lot of money pouring into Kamala Harris' campaign, with a Swiss billionaire named Hans Georg Weiss contributing $20 million through 1.6 million individual donations from 400,000 donors. Allegations of fraud are now surfacing due to the scale of these donations.

The Biden family made over $10,000,000 from their business dealings with China, including a $1,000,000 payment for legal services that were never provided.

Kamala Harris raised suspiciously large amounts of money in a short time, sparking concerns about fraudulent donations. An investigation revealed potential money laundering through ActBlue, a democratic fundraising platform. Ordinary citizens' names and addresses were used for large donations they did not make. The source of the money remains unclear, but past reports suggest further scrutiny is needed.

She was asked how many votes she could deliver for Biden and mentioned at least 5,000 votes for $55,000. She clarified that it could be more but didn't want to overpromise with only 16 days left until the election. She requested $85,000 upfront in cash. She emphasized that she's getting the Biden vote out but won't do it for free. She mentioned a cost of $5 to $8 per vote but didn't specify the total number of votes.

Kamala Harris is allegedly paying people to attend rallies. The speaker claims to have proof of this through a Casting Network billboard. The billboard sought nonunion actors for a Democratic event, offering payment, a per diem for meals and transportation, and coverage of flight and other expenses. The submissions were due the day before the speaker discussed it. The speaker believes this shows that the Harris campaign's ground game is a facade, as they are willing to pay for people to attend rallies.

Bill Gates reportedly donated $50 million to Kamala Harris's campaign via a 501c4, which is an organization allegedly set up to conceal large money donations. According to the New York Times, this was Gates's first donation in twenty years, during which he had remained bipartisan and stayed out of politics. When asked, Gates stated he donated zero to the 2020 campaign but felt the need to donate to Harris's campaign because it was different than any other. Separately, Gates was reportedly indicted in The Netherlands for lying to the public about the COVID vaccine and will have to go to trial. The speaker suggests Gates donated to Harris to avoid trial in the United States.

Kamala Harris's campaign is facing scrutiny after a $1,000,000 loss and allegations of money laundering. Just before an interview with Al Sharpton, her campaign donated $500,000 to his nonprofit, raising questions about the motives behind the donation. Critics argue that this appears to be a bribe, as Sharpton's organization has a history of questionable financial practices, including spending on private jets and limousines. The situation suggests a troubling connection between Harris's campaign and Sharpton's nonprofit, leading to concerns about transparency and integrity in political funding.

The speaker claims the Democratic party is paying TikTok users thousands of dollars to create content promoting the party, and that they were offered nearly $15,000 to do so. They also claim to have seen mutuals posting content aligned with these pitches within 48 hours, without disclosing they were paid. The speaker says they received two pitches: one for ongoing monthly videos leading up to the election, and another to fearmonger about Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation. They criticize the Democratic party for allegedly using fearmongering tactics with bad information. The speaker notes that Heritage Foundation trustees are endorsing both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, and that Barack Obama previously worked with them. They state that one pitch instructed them to not directly say "vote for Kamala Harris for legal purposes." The speaker says they are informing viewers that people are being paid to create political content.

Last year, reports surfaced about lavish spending from campaign funds on luxury items by Harris. Former aides claimed she used the funds like a personal checking account. When asked about public concerns regarding her spending habits, Harris acknowledged early campaign issues were addressed through restructuring. She believes the problems have been solved.

The speaker claims the Democratic party is paying TikTok users thousands of dollars to create content promoting the party, and that they were offered nearly $15,000 to do so. They allege that some mutuals began posting content aligned with these pitches within 48 hours, without disclosing they were paid. The speaker says they received two pitches: one for ongoing monthly videos leading up to the election, and another to fearmonger about Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation. They criticize the Democrats for allegedly using fearmongering tactics, noting the Heritage Foundation has been influential since the 1970s and that its trustees endorse both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. The speaker highlights a pitch instruction to avoid directly saying "vote for Kamala Harris" for legal reasons.

Mike Benz outlines a conspiracy tied to the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) and a June 2020 war game that purportedly sought “a way to use riots, nationwide riots, and do favors to the Black Lives Matter movement so that they would owe them favors back to take to the streets against Trump if Trump won the election fair and square,” while also needing “a robust, intentional, and specific strategy to go after the networks that enabled Trump's rise to power” so they could be jailed after Trump left office. Bubba Boyd, who has written about the event since August 2020, explains that the discussion will cover the key players in TIP, the plan to subvert the 2020 election, how rigging the election and four prosecutions of Trump flow from the June 2020 conspirators’ meeting, and excerpts from a January 2020 Donald Trump speech to the World Economic Forum that allegedly signals why Trump and Trumpism had to be eliminated. The publicly named sponsors of the war game are Rosa Brooks and Niles Gilman of the Berggruen Institute in Los Angeles, described as the “globalist home of Silicon Valley’s anti-Trump billionaires,” with branches in Venice and Beijing and a China branch in direct dialogue with Xi Jinping. Michael Anton is cited as the author of a Trump national security document who criticized TIP’s war game, stating they were planning a coup against the election and publicizing the war game to normalize the idea. Brooks’s background is summarized as a lawyer for George Shullis at the Open Society Institute, then a State Department attorney for regime change, then a Pentagon policy lawyer under Obama, while teaching at Georgetown Law. The narrative asserts she advocated impeaching Trump and a potential 25th Amendment move, and even a military coup, in a 2017 Foreign Policy piece titled “three ways to get rid of president Trump before 2020,” including the sentence: “For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officers might simply tell the president, no, sir. We’re not doing that.” The claim is that she “couldn’t wait to launch a coup against Trump,” a portrayal attributed to a New York Times editorial response. In June 2020, Brooks and Gilman allegedly convened TIP’s war game about the 2020 election and its possible aftermath, with over 100 participants and 76 role players drawn from former Pentagon officials, the intelligence community, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the media, and Republican and Democratic institutions. Names publicly associated with anti-Trump activity are listed, including John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Bill Kristol, Michael Steele, Jennifer Granholm, and other unnamed figures, all described as major players in attempts to nullify the 2016 election and overthrow the government. Benz is said to detail the TIP war games and concludes that to prevent a second Trump term, Biden would need a large victory margin to overcome fraud perceptions, with the insurrectionist scenario calling for control of the military, Black Lives Matter, and other street rioters. The narrative asserts that BLM raised about 90 million in 2020 with donors like the Democracy Alliance and the Ford Foundation, and that Mark Elias led financial filings associated with the effort. The discussion further cites Defense One articles from August 2020 that reportedly called for a military coup and a subsequent open debate within the military about accepting orders, and claims that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley “was not about to obey any order from the president.” The appendix to TIP’s report allegedly debated criminally proceeding against Trump after leaving office and wiping out his “white supremacist and extremist base,” with a quote describing the need for a strategy to challenge networks that enabled Trump’s rise and remained “imbecible to the kind of pluralist democracy the founders intended,” implying a path toward removing Trump’s influence even after his presidency. The transcript also notes contemporary references to Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation linked to 2022 midterms, and alleged targeting of Republican election operations and other figures by the FBI. Excerpts from Trump’s World Economic Forum address and a January 2020 speech are presented to illustrate a moral and strategic framing against globalism and “radical socialists.” The presentation ends by inviting audience support and promoting further engagement, including a free newsletter.

Listen to this. I can't believe these numbers: $10 million for Beyoncé to support Kamala Harris, $5 million each for Megan Thee Stallion and Lizzo, and $1.8 million for Eminem. Is this how it usually works? Also, how much do you think Donald Trump paid Elon Musk? Can Trump even afford Musk? It seems like these are just fake relationships where people are paid to pretend to support each other. This is ridiculous.

The speakers discuss Kamala Harris's campaign allegedly paying for Google ads to promote articles with edited headlines and subheads. These altered headlines, according to the speakers, present a more favorable view of Harris than the original articles. Speaker 1 asserts that the Harris campaign is paying for misinformation, while simultaneously criticizing others for spreading it. Speaker 2 notes that while the ads are labeled as "paid for," many people may not notice the disclaimer. He adds that the original articles are already so positive that the campaign only needs to tweak the headlines to make them even more favorable. Speaker 0 expresses disgust, pointing out Harris has never received a vote, yet was allowed to approach the nomination without scrutiny. The Harris campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

The Kamala Harris rally in Houston, Texas, featured appearances by Beyonce and Kelly Rowland, but attendees were upset when Harris took the stage after only a brief appearance by Beyonce. Many attendees expected a free concert and felt misled. As soon as Kamala Harris appeared, many people left, feeling that the event was a "bait and switch." The speaker believes that the event was a mistake, especially with the election less than two weeks away, and that Harris should be ashamed.

Both the DNC and RNC target corporations and elites while a "money reality" exists in politics. Suites costing $500+ are occupied by those they claim to regulate, looking down on the "soldiers" who volunteer time for their parties. These attendees pay significant sums for access, while parties receive gifted hotel suites. Presidential campaign spending has risen from $300 million in 2000 to a projected $10 billion. Harris has raised hundreds of millions recently, some from small donors. Legal money, post-Citizens United, is now the most dangerous in politics. Promises to fight against this system are questionable, as evidenced by Trump's million-dollar-a-plate fundraisers.

She was asked how many votes she could deliver for Biden and said at least 5,000 for $55,000. She stated she needs cash upfront and won't do it for free. She mentioned getting the Biden vote out and not worrying if they don't pay her. The cost per vote was mentioned as $5 to $8.

Kamala received a $1,000,000 payment for an interview in September, raising questions about her motives. She previously labeled Trump a dictator, which helped her secure $1,000,000,000 in donations, but much of that was allegedly mismanaged. In a podcast appearance, she insisted the host travel to DC and used campaign funds to create an elaborate fake set in a hotel room, costing over $100,000 for just two chairs and a table. The actual cost could have been around $6, leaving uncertainty about the remaining funds. Following the election loss, her campaign sent out urgent donation requests, prompting skepticism about how donor money is being utilized.

A drag queen received an email from Pallet Media offering $1500 for anti-Trump TikTok content. The creator brief outlined "do's and don'ts," including avoiding any support for Donald Trump and his allies, praising Harris and her allies, and attacking Trump supporters' intellectual or personal values. The drag queen investigated the offer, inquiring if it was for the Kamala campaign or a PAC campaign. They discovered the campaign was with FutureForward, described as one of the biggest super PACs with hundreds of millions of dollars.

The Kamala Harris rally in Houston was chaotic. Beyoncé and Kelly Rowland made an appearance, but Beyoncé only spoke for three minutes, leaving the crowd disappointed. People expected a concert, not a political event. When Kamala Harris took the stage, the mood shifted, and attendees felt deceived. Many in the audience, around 30,000, were frustrated just weeks before the election. The event turned into a night to forget, with strong feelings of discontent directed at Harris for the perceived bait and switch.

A number of celebrities, including Cardi B, LeBron James, Martha Stewart, Taylor Swift, Ellen DeGeneres, Beyonce, Ben Stiller, Oprah Winfrey, Madonna, Jay-Z, Jennifer Lopez, and Leonardo DiCaprio, have recently come out in support of Kamala Harris. It raises the question of whether their support is genuine or if they feel pressured to endorse her. What could they possibly have in common that drives this collective backing?

Kamala Harris reportedly received $1,000,000 for an interview in September, raising questions about her commitment to democracy. After calling Trump a dictator, she secured $1,000,000,000 in donations but allegedly mismanaged the funds, spending lavishly. During a podcast appearance, she insisted the host travel to DC and used campaign funds to create an elaborate set in a hotel room, which cost significantly more than necessary. Following the election loss, her campaign sent out urgent donation requests, prompting skepticism about how donor money is being utilized.