reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks whether vaccinated friends or family have “a whole different personality” or are “more angry” since getting injections, and then claims there is “a strong association between COVID-nineteen injections and neuropsychiatric disorders.” They say the information comes “directly from the FDA and the CDC,” and that they will provide a link to the study. The speaker states that “thresholds that were all breached” were “way over,” and that the factors listed next are “a more likely determination.” They then list specific reported increases in neuropsychiatric conditions, including: psychosis being “four forty times more likely,” dementia being “140 times,” schizophrenia being “three fifteen times,” and suicidal thoughts.

- The speakers discuss data on vaccination, noting that “月 15 日 な ん と 1 800 万 人 の 接 種 回 数 人 数 分 の デー タ が 蓄 積 さ れ て お り ま す” – roughly, a large accumulation of data on vaccination counts (about 18 million vaccination events). - Speaker 1 attempts to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. They say the unvaccinated “は 山 ま 行 け な っ いう は 特 に 当たり 前 な ん ですよね 。 打っ て も 別 に 殴ら れ る わけ じゃ な 打っ て い ま せ ん の で 、何 の 問 題 も なく 、 フラ ット に な る わけ です 。” In other words, the unvaccinated are described as obviously not having issues even if they are not vaccinated, while vaccinated people may become “flat” or experience issues. - The main focus is on the vaccinated group. They describe a “緑 の 裏” that starts low, with a peak over one to two weeks. They note a pattern beginning around two months, with large peaks around three to four months. They interpret this as possibly reflecting a reaction pattern in doctors, who after vaccination might observe effects on the day, the next day, or about a week later, suggesting a vaccine effect or adverse response that diminishes over time. - There is mention of sending information to PM DA (a recipient or channel for information), indicating that the information is being transmitted to PM DA as part of the data flow. - Another finding is that as vaccination numbers increase, the “山” (the peak) of the adverse or death-related data shifts to the earlier positions, described as moving “前の方、左 の 方 に 移 動 し て い る.” The implication is that the distribution of the peak shifts with increasing vaccination counts. - Speaker 1 then asserts that “接 種 回 数 が 増 え て い く と 、死 亡 者 の 山 の 湿 原 が 早 く なり ます。” meaning that as vaccination numbers rise, the peak of fatalities or deaths “湿 原” becomes earlier, i.e., happens sooner. - They conclude that if there were no toxicity or lipid adjuvant effects from vaccination, the peak would not occur. This is presented as a finding: “ワクチン 接 種 に 毒 性 だ と か 脂 肪 を 誘 導 する 効 果 が なけれ ば 、山 に まず な ら な い わけ です よ .” In short, the absence of toxicity or adjuvant effects would mean the peak wouldn’t appear. - The overall takeaways emphasize observed patterns: the vaccinated group shows a rising and shifting peak over time with increasing vaccination counts, and there is a suggestion that the vaccination might be associated with a pattern of adverse observations that intensify or appear earlier as more people are vaccinated.

私は認知症神経科学の専門家で、最近の研究では、65歳以上の人々が2回のコロナワクチン接種後に認知症リスクが増加していることが示されています。未接種者に比べて、軽度認知障害（MCI）の発症率が2倍以上に増加し、アルツハイマー病のリスクも上昇しています。認知症は深刻な問題であり、薬がないため、介護が必要な状況が続くことがあります。 Translation: I specialize in cognitive neuroscience, and recent research shows that individuals aged 65 and older have an increased risk of dementia after receiving two doses of the Corona vaccine. The incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has more than doubled compared to non-vaccinated individuals, and the risk of Alzheimer's disease has also increased. Dementia is a serious issue, and without medication, the need for care can persist for a long time.

The transcript reports that the largest single study on vaccines and dementia, involving over thirteen million people, found that vaccinated adults who received flu shots and pneumococcal shots faced a 50% increased risk of Alzheimer's disease and a 38% increased risk of dementia. It is claimed that the risk increased the more doses participants received, with individuals who lined up to receive more flu shots over the years experiencing the highest risks of neurodegenerative conditions, and that the risk persisted for more than ten years. The narrative states that once a person receives many of these shots, it is inducing neuroinflammatory injury, dementia, and Alzheimer's in vaccinated adults. Additionally, the transcript asserts that not only does the flu shot not work, according to colleagues at the Cleveland Clinic, but flu shots increase the risk of flu by 27%. It concludes by saying that flu shots, in addition to increasing flu risk, appear to increase the risk of dementia.

COVID-19 injections are associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, according to an FDA and CDC study. The speaker claims that psychosis is 440 times more likely, dementia 140 times, schizophrenia 315 times, suicidal thoughts 150 times, and homicidal ideation 25 times. Brain clots are allegedly 3,000 times more likely, depression 530 times, and violent behavior 80 times. Cognitive decline is purportedly 115 times more likely and delusions 50 times. The speaker believes psychiatric harm is caused by the accumulation of toxic spike proteins, mRNA, lipid nanoparticles, and other unknown components.

The speaker discusses an asserted link between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, claiming a strong association. They state that the information comes directly from the FDA and the CDC and promise to leave the study link in the comments. The speaker notes that “these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over,” and asserts that the items about to be listed are “a more likely determination.” The claim is that these are thresholds or criteria related to the studied association, and the speaker emphasizes that these are “times” of likelihood. Specifically, the speaker lists several neuropsychiatric outcomes and how much more likely they are purported to be following vaccination. They say: psychosis is “four forty times more likely.” Dementia is “140 times” more likely. Schizophrenia is “three fifteen times” more likely. They also mention “Suicidal thoughts,” but the transcript ends before the figure for suicidal thoughts is provided. The speaker frames these figures as a direct consequence of the injections, tying them to the referenced thresholds and thresholds being breached as evidence of a strong association. In summary, the primary claims presented are that there exists a strong association between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, supported by data from the FDA and CDC, with specific numerical claims that psychosis, dementia, and schizophrenia are markedly more likely post-injection, quantified as 440 times, 140 times, and 315 times more likely, respectively, with a forthcoming figure for suicidal thoughts that is not included in the provided transcript. The overall argument hinges on breached thresholds and the designation of these conditions as more likely determinations following vaccination, as presented by the speaker.

The speaker discusses potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, including its potential to suppress the immune system and reactivate latent viral infections. They mention a scientific journal, The Lancet, which released a study showing that immune function among vaccinated individuals was lower than that of unvaccinated individuals. The speaker expresses sympathy for those who may have been misled or forced to take the vaccine. They also highlight data from The Lancet's study, revealing a higher rate of medical incidents among double-vaccinated individuals aged around 80 compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker questions why this finding is not receiving more attention.

As of the 15th, data have accumulated from vaccination records covering 18 million people (including vaccination counts and corresponding individuals). The analysis compares vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups as accurately as possible, represented by orange (unvaccinated) and green (vaccinated). In the unvaccinated group (orange), no “mountain” or peak appears, which the speaker says is expected: since unvaccinated individuals have not received injections, their outcomes do not suddenly change due to vaccination, so the pattern remains flat. The issue is described as occurring in the vaccinated group (green). At first, the vaccinated group’s pattern is low, but during the following period the speaker reports that the “mountain” emerges: not immediately, but increasingly after about one to two weeks. The speaker claims that a clearer peak becomes visible around one month, and then develops again around the third and fourth months, when the “mountain” is said to form. The speaker interprets this timing in a specific way. They suggest that doctors who administered the injections may have been filing reports to the PMDA (Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency) based on observations that, roughly within the first day to about one week after vaccination, there is likely an effect of the vaccine leading to disappearance of reactions—described as “in a period where onset reactions would have occurred” being replaced by a lack of “unwanted responses” in that early window. The speaker also reports an additional finding: as vaccination counts increase, the “mountain” in deaths is said to shift earlier and toward the left in time. They state that increasing the number of vaccinations leads to earlier appearance of the death peak, which they describe as increasing risk within a shorter period. In their explanation, this implies that the effect contributing to the peak becomes stronger or more pronounced with repeated doses, because “more doses” are said to make the peak appear sooner. They further claim that for a peak to arise, vaccination would need to have a toxic effect or an effect that induces “fat” (脂肪) according to the speaker’s wording. They conclude by stating that they believe the observed shifting and earlier peaks indicate accumulating harmful effects: as dose frequency increases, toxicity would overlap (“重複混沌”) and the time until effects dissipate would shorten, consistent with the earlier movement of the peak.

Speaker 0: The transcript cites multiple studies indicating severe behavioral changes in those who receive mRNA shots. A study by Oten colleagues found that the mRNA vaccine mRNA and spike protein were being produced in cerebral arteries of stroke patients. It is stated that the mRNA shot is based on the second largest COVID vaccine safety study ever conducted with eighty five million people in it, which purportedly found a two hundred percent increased risk of stroke after dose two of mRNA shots. The claim is that the vaccine goes to the brain, causes brain damage and neuronal destruction, and that this is reflected in neuropsychiatric conditions. This is linked to a study by Doctor James Thorpe and colleagues, which allegedly identified eighty-six neuropsychiatric safety signals for these COVID shots, including homicide, homicidal tendencies, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, and violent behavior, all claimed to be far in excess of what was reported with flu vaccinations, and described as corroborating multiple other studies. The transcript also references a study from Korea finding increased Alzheimer's risks and increased cognitive impairment risks, and another Korea study reporting a massive increased risk of depression, sleep disorders, and anxiety from these injections. The overall assertion is that, based on peer reviewed evidence, the injections damage the brain, cause brain damage resulting in neuropsychiatric conditions.

Speaker 0: Take the shot and protect yourself and the people around you. We all feel a chill when we hear that. Mrs. van der Hof from the RIVM, you’ve researched the effects of vaccination. If you look under the line, has it had any usefulness? Speaker 1: It has certainly been useful. In fact, from our research, but also from many other studies, people who were vaccinated had a lower chance of dying from COVID, and we see that effect with every shot that’s given. We also studied whether there is a higher chance of dying from diseases other than COVID shortly after vaccination, to see whether there is vaccine harm, and we do not find that either, which is also in line with what is found internationally. Speaker 0: Okay, because that is the story you hear at the dinner table. Earlier this week someone said, I see so many people dying, there must be something. Speaker 1: Yes. Well, there are certainly people who have died due to the vaccination. We cannot deny that. That has been investigated; we find that in the Netherlands through Lareb, and we find that internationally as well. You just have to weigh the very small chance that you become ill or die from a vaccination against the chance that you become very ill or die from COVID. And the balance tips toward vaccination. Speaker 0: Yes, vaccination protects more than it harms, you just said. Also, have you studied the chance of death due to vaccination? Speaker 1: Well, we looked at people who were vaccinated and whether within 2 months after vaccination they had an increased chance of dying from anything other than COVID. If there were an indication there, we would see it, and we absolutely do not find that. Speaker 0: No, that is simply not found. Okay. Mrs. Van der Broek, and the pandemic was a priority.

Speaker 0 states that the study confirms suspicions from the past five years that common sense has deteriorated in the population. The study analyzed the VAERS system from the 1990s to 2024 and examined PRRs (proportional reporting ratios), which measure how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. It reports 8686 safety signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events, with some up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. The safety signal threshold defined by CDC/FDA for PRRs is greater than two, and all reported signals exceeded this threshold. The listed conditions include schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, and psychosis, described as people hallucinating and brain damage. The speaker notes that this large number of safety signals aligns with a recent study indicating that people who had strokes showed toxic spike protein production in their brains for up to seventeen months after vaccination, which the speaker suggests explains the observed deterioration in cognitive function.

Speaker 1 asks for information on how the vaccine links to dementia, citing a grandmother who suffered from dementia after the COVID vaccine. Speaker 0 responds: "I'm so sorry, and thank you for bringing that up." He notes: "lipid nanoparticles traverse the blood brain barrier" and "lipid nanoparticles were developed and understood to traverse the blood brain barrier." He cites "the indoctrinated brain" by doctor Michael Nels and says "the combination of propaganda, repetition of messages while people are in a state of fear actually damages and rewires the brain" and that there is "this actual brain damage from the injection specifically destroying or damaging the prefrontal cortex." He mentions "lost their memories of themselves" and "there's so much dementia and Alzheimer's type damage in the Pfizer documents." He adds "these lipid nanoparticles damage the brain as they circulate through the system, you know, crossing the blood brain barrier." He suggests "traumas based interventions" and "you can possibly rebuild the myelin sheath of the nervous system." "So that's the best I can do, and I'm really sorry that that happened to your grandma."

A study from the Oxford Academic QJM Medical Journal suggests a potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and the development of Alzheimer's disease. The study, conducted in Seoul, South Korea, analyzed data from a random 50% sample of city residents aged 65 and above. Findings showed an increased incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in vaccinated individuals, particularly those receiving mRNA vaccines within 3 months post-vaccination. No significant relationship was found with vascular dementia or Parkinson's disease. Preliminary evidence suggests a potential link between COVID-19 vaccination, particularly mRNA vaccines, and increased incidences of AD and MCI. The study underscores the need for further research to elucidate the relationship between vaccine-induced immune responses and neurodegenerative processes, advocating for continuous monitoring and investigation into vaccines' long-term neurological effects. The CDC and FDA still recommend COVID-19 vaccines.

先生方のプロフィールを紹介します。コマ野先生は薬学博士であり、100年生き方塾の代表理事を務めています。最近の研究では、コロナワクチン接種後に認知症リスクが増加する可能性が示されています。65歳以上の人々に対する調査では、ワクチン接種者の認知症リスクが未接種者と比べて2倍に増加しました。この結果は、認知症の増加と関連がある可能性が指摘されています。この情報は重要であり、認知症の予防について考える上で重要な示唆を与えています。 Translation: Let me introduce the profiles of our guest speakers. Dr. Komanoya is a pharmaceutical doctor and the representative director of the 100-Year Life Academy. Recent research suggests an increased risk of dementia after receiving the corona vaccine. A study on people aged 65 and above found that the risk of dementia for vaccine recipients doubled compared to non-recipients. This indicates a potential link between vaccine and dementia risk, providing crucial insights for dementia prevention.

The speaker, a medical professor in Japan, discusses the need to raise awareness about medical complications related to COVID-19 vaccines. They highlight specific cases of adverse effects, including a 28-year-old man who died after receiving the vaccine. The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines, criticizing the World Health Organization (WHO) for its handling of the vaccination campaign. They argue that the vaccines should not have been approved and that the WHO lacks the necessary expertise. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of conducting comprehensive research on the outcomes and damages caused by the vaccines. They express concern about the decline of science and the need for transparency in reporting vaccine-related incidents.

The speaker discusses the inflammatory and amyloidogenic effects of small sequences called epitopes, which can cause memory dysfunction in mice. They also mention a study that found the introduction of gene transfection technologies containing the spike protein can induce amyloidogenic cascades. The speaker highlights a 200% increase in the diagnosis of CJD in France after the rollout of vaccination programs, suggesting a potential link. They discuss the loss of cognitive function associated with exposure to the spike protein and propose that amyloidogenic disease processes may underlie long-haul COVID-19 symptoms. The speaker mentions the role of viral infections in facilitating intercellular aggregate dissemination and shares examples of misfolding prion amyloidogenic diseases.

コマ野先生は薬学博士で、認知症の研究に専念しています。最近の研究では、65歳以上の2回ワクチン接種者の認知症リスクが未接種者に比べて2倍増加し、3ヶ月後にはアルツハイマー病になるリスクも有意に上昇しています。認知症は深刻な問題であり、65歳以上の5人に1人が認知症になっています。この状況が悪化すると、高齢者の認知症リスクがさらに増加し、日本の認知症患者数が深刻な状況になる可能性があります。 Translation: Dr. Komanoya is a pharmaceutical doctor specializing in dementia research. Recent studies show that the risk of dementia doubles for those over 65 who receive two vaccine doses compared to those who do not. After three months, the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease significantly increases. Dementia is a serious issue, with one in five individuals over 65 affected. If the situation worsens, the risk of dementia among the elderly will further increase, potentially leading to a critical situation in Japan.

I am Masayasu Inoue, a professor of molecular pathology. The COVID-19 pandemic led to rushed genetic vaccines causing unprecedented injuries. Japan's high vaccination rate resulted in severe adverse effects. The government plans to introduce new self-replicating vaccines despite risks. International collaboration is needed to stop these dangerous actions. Censorship hinders spreading vaccine dangers. Trust in Japan-made vaccines is cautioned against for future pandemics. Sharing information globally is crucial for unity and protection of human rights. Let's work together to safeguard our health and future. Thank you.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

Speaker 0 asserts that truth is out and that scientists are now confirming long-suspected effects of the COVID-19 shots beyond the immune system, specifically that they can damage the brain and devastate mental health. The claim is that the evidence is overwhelming and that a new wave of studies has revealed significant increases in various neurological and psychiatric conditions, all linked to the presence of toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. The summary of claimed study findings includes: - Ischemic strokes: up forty-four percent. - Hemorrhagic strokes: up fifty percent. - Transient ischemic strokes (mini strokes): up sixty-seven percent. - Myasthenia gravis, described as a debilitating autoimmune condition: up over seventy-one percent. - Alzheimer’s disease: up twenty-two percent. - Cognitive impairment: up nearly one hundred and thirty-eight percent. - Depression: up over sixty-eight percent. - Anxiety disorders: up nearly forty-four percent. - Sleep disorders: up over ninety-three percent. Speaker 0 links all of these increases to one cause: toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. The statement "This isn't a conspiracy theory" is used to bolster the claim that there is documented peer-reviewed research and published studies supporting these observations. The speaker cites epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher as an example of an expert who has commented on the issue. The quote attributed to Holcher describes using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or even years, and characterizes this approach as one of the worst ideas in medical history. In closing, Speaker 0 poses a question, "So what can you do?" signaling a transition from presenting the alleged findings to offering potential actions or recommendations. The overall message is that COVID-19 vaccines are claimed to cause widespread brain toxicity and mental health problems through persistent spike protein, with purported evidence from peer-reviewed studies and expert commentary cited to support the assertions.

**Original Language Summary:** スピーカーは、現状を周りに広めてほしいと述べ、国会での原口先生の活動が大きな力になると強調。村上先生は、コロナ自体は重症化しないが、ワクチン接種によって別の病気が重症化し死亡する事例があると指摘。パンデミック条約とIHR（7月19日期限）に対する全国的な運動を呼びかけ。 イベントでは、国が行わない日本人大量死の検証として、接種者1800万人データベースが初公開された。参加を呼びかけ、自身のデータがない人も、データ提供者として協力してほしいと述べた。詳細な情報は動画コメント欄にあり、専門知識を持つ人々を含め、得意分野を活かして協力し、真相を解明し命を守ることを訴えた。 **English Translation:** The speaker asks listeners to spread awareness of the current situation and emphasizes that Mr. Haraguchi's activities in the Diet are a great source of strength. Mr. Murakami points out that while COVID-19 itself does not cause severe illness, vaccination can lead to the aggravation and death from other diseases. He calls for a nationwide movement against the Pandemic Treaty and IHR (deadline July 19). The event featured the first public release of a database of 18 million vaccinated individuals as part of a verification of mass Japanese deaths that the government is not conducting. They urged participation, stating that even those whose data is not included should cooperate as data providers. Detailed information is available in the video comments section, and they appealed for cooperation, including those with specialized knowledge, to use their areas of expertise to uncover the truth and protect lives.

高知大学医学部の佐野重俊特任教授は、ワクチン接種後に発生する皮膚疾患を研究しています。70代男性患者の右腕上腕部には皮膚の異常が見られ、他にも海上方針やヘルペスの再発などの症例がありました。佐野教授は、特殊な染料を用いて組織を調べた結果、ワクチン由来のスパイクタンパクが皮膚に存在することを確認しました。スパイクタンパクはウイルスの表面にあり、免疫系がウイルスを攻撃するための目印となります。ファイザー社やモデルナ社のワクチンは、ウイルスの遺伝子の一部を注入し、体内でスパイクタンパクを生成させることで免疫を形成します。 --- Professor Shigetoshi Sano at Kochi University Medical School is researching skin diseases that occur after vaccination. A 70-year-old male patient exhibited skin abnormalities on his upper arm, along with other cases like herpes reactivation. Using a special dye, Sano confirmed the presence of vaccine-derived spike proteins in the skin. Spike proteins are found on the virus's surface and serve as markers for the immune system to attack the virus. Vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna inject parts of the virus's genetic material to prompt the body to produce spike proteins, thereby generating immunity.

新型コロナワクチンの接種は2021年から始まり、日本では4億回以上の接種が行われています。接種率は80％で、副反応報告は3万6千件を超えています。一部の接種後に重篤な症状が現れており、死亡疑い報告も2168件あります。国は重大な懸念を示しており、接種後の死亡が増えるとさらなる検討が必要です。 Translation: The vaccination of the new coronavirus began in 2021, with over 400 million doses administered in Japan. The vaccination rate is 80%, with over 36,000 reported adverse reactions. Some individuals experienced severe symptoms after vaccination, and there have been 2,168 reports of suspected deaths. The country is expressing serious concerns, and further consideration is needed as the number of deaths post-vaccination increases.

専門家は、2021年以降、モデルナやファイザーのワクチンについて決戦ができると述べています。日本では報道されなかったが、新型コロナワクチンの後遺症が他のワクチンよりも多く報告されています。死者数が増加しており、問題となっています。 Translation: Experts say that a battle can be fought with the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines since 2021. In Japan, it was not reported, but the side effects of the new coronavirus vaccine have been reported more than other vaccines. The number of deaths is increasing and has become a problem.

新型コロナワクチンの被害認定予算が増額され、110倍の健康被害が懸念される。厚生労働省が39.7億7000万円の予算を想定。Health damage from the COVID-19 vaccine in the fiscal year 2023 has led to a budget increase to 39.7 billion 700 million yen, raising concerns of over 100 times the expected health damage by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.