reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 states that over 6,000 bodies have been found, citing information from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and other government bodies. Speaker 1 questions this claim, asking for clarification on where these bodies were found and if the Truth and Reconciliation Commission reported finding 6,000 bodies. Speaker 1 asserts that as a journalist, Speaker 0 should be concerned about the accuracy of their claims. Speaker 0 requests to complete their questions.

Many people are concerned about South Africa, which is the purpose of the meeting. Many people feel persecuted and are coming to the United States. The U.S. takes people from many locations if there's persecution or genocide. There have been a tremendous number of people, especially white farmers, fleeing South Africa. It is a very sad thing to see. The speaker hopes to have an explanation and knows the president doesn't want that. Normally, meetings talk about trade, which will be discussed along with the situation in South Africa.

Speaker 1 asserts there is no genocide in Gaza and that Palestine is a name invented by the Roman Empire. Speaker 0 states this view isn't shared by the rest of the world. Speaker 1 says he is glad Speaker 0 speaks for the rest of the world. Speaker 1 questions why he should listen to the United Nations, calling it a "clown show" that should be pushed into the Hudson River. He accuses the UN of creating child prostitution rackets in Africa and asks what it has done to solve anything of late. Speaker 0 asks what Speaker 1 thinks of the UN. Speaker 1 questions Speaker 0's claim to represent the world's opinion.

The discussion centers on Trump's policy shift, halting refugee admission for those fleeing war and famine while seemingly favoring white South African immigrants. One speaker asserts that Afrikaners, descendants of apartheid architects, are wrongly portrayed by right-wing movements as dispossessed white Christians, despite owning 78% of farmland while comprising only 7% of the population. Trump's claim of genocide against them is called a lie. Another speaker argues that the Trump administration's actions are driven by a white nationalist agenda and great replacement theory, influencing immigration policies and voting rights. The speaker emphasizes the need to recognize and name this agenda to avoid complicity. A final point is made about the difficulty Democrats face in countering Trump's actions, which are seen as interconnected manifestations of his desire for authoritarian control.

The Afrikaans people have no other home, and their language is unique to them. They are descendants of Dutch settlers who arrived in South Africa before the British. The speaker argues against rewriting history to pretend that African tribes didn't compete for resources before settlers arrived. They recount a story about Zulu tribesmen questioning why white men cared more about rhinos than their own land. The speaker questions who has a legitimate claim to land, as they believe humanity's presence is increasingly viewed as an aberration. They claim that when farmers arrived in South Africa, the land was uninhabited and transformed into fertile land. They warn of the consequences of governments taking land without compensation, citing Zimbabwe as an example where land seizures led to violence, cronyism, and agricultural collapse. The speaker suggests that simply being Black does not qualify someone to manage a commercial farm.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core facts, insights, and conclusions without adding new analysis. - Highlight unique or surprising elements (e.g., calls for Nuremberg II trials, journalist impact, public opinion data). - Exclude repetitions and filler; focus on the evolution of emotional and political reactions. - Translate any non-English context to English (not needed here). - Keep exact terms where possible (genocide, hostages, journalist reporting, public polls). - Aim for a concise 392–491 word summary that captures both speakers’ points and the dialogue’s tension. The transcript condensed: Speaker 0 describes a mixed emotional reaction to recent developments: Israelis held in Gaza for two years reuniting with families, and Palestinians held in Israeli dungeons—about 2,000 people—many for years or months without charges, whom he also calls hostages lacking due process. He is moved by these reunions and by the momentary halt of what he calls a genocide, preventing bombing and possible incineration of Gazans. Yet he recalls two years of genocidal violence as unspeakable and notes the lack of accountability for Western leaders who participated, observing Western leaders visiting Egypt to commemorate an end to the violence. He questions how to emotionally and intellectually react to this “mixed bag of incentives.” Speaker 1 counters by branding President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu as “two war criminals” responsible for genocide since December 2023 in Gaza, arguing they would be found guilty at Nuremberg II trials and would be hung. He asserts Trump has aided the genocide during nearly nine months in office, and that Netanyahu is guilty as well, yet both are treated as conquering heroes—eliciting his sense of sickness and frustration at the absence of accountability. He suggests that once journalists enter Gaza and report the full story, including on platforms like TikTok, global dismay could hinder Israel from restarting the genocide. He clarifies he isn’t asserting likelihood, but hopes increasing documentation and voices will pressure Israel, the United States, and Europe to shut down the genocide permanently, though he concedes uncertainty. Speaker 0 then notes global public opinion appears to be turning against Israel, particularly in Western states reliant on it, and cites military pause as a tactic to relieve pressure and allow Israel’s military to rebuild. He suggests that Western elites are incentivized to resume pro-Israel positions, aided by domestic lobbying, and questions whether the pause will relieve pressure or enable normalization. Speaker 1 responds that elites are morally bankrupt, including the Biden administration’s deep involvement in the genocide, but acknowledges pressure from below—such as shifts in the Republican Party and Democratic Party, and European actions like Italy’s general strikes and a German poll showing 62% of Germans believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. He believes the rising information will help people “wrap our heads around it” and possible pressure to act, though outcomes remain uncertain.

Speaker 1 states there is no genocide in Gaza and that Palestine is a name invented by the Roman Empire. Speaker 0 says this view is not shared by the rest of the world. Speaker 1 responds that they are glad Speaker 0 speaks for the rest of the world. Speaker 0 mentions the United Nations General Assembly. Speaker 1 says the United Nations sends people in blue helmets to rape little girls in Africa and that the United Nations could be pushed into the Hudson. Speaker 0 asks what Speaker 1 thinks of the UN. Speaker 1 questions Speaker 0's claim to represent the world's opinion.

The discussion centers on whether Afrikaners in South Africa are facing genocide and whether the U.S. is prioritizing them for asylum. The DHS representative states that 8,666 individuals have been granted asylum in the U.S. since January 20, including 59 Afrikaners who faced racial violence and land seizure by their government. She accuses the interviewer of defending race-based discrimination and violence and whitewashing the persecution of Afrikaners. The interviewer disputes the claim of genocide, stating that it is not recognized by the U.S. or the UN and that violence affects all races in South Africa. He questions whether Congolese and Sudanese refugees facing actual genocide will receive the same expedited path to asylum as Afrikaners. He claims the president has specifically let in Afrikaners. The DHS representative insists asylum is granted regardless of color or creed to those facing persecution and undergoing proper vetting.

The discussion centers on a South African refugee program and whether violence against white South Africans constitutes genocide. One speaker argues violence doesn't equal genocide, specifying genocide aims to eliminate an entire group. A question arises whether a South African passport held by someone of Dutch descent is "tainted" or unequal. One panelist says it is not, but another claims Dutch South Africans feel their passports are not equal and fear for their lives, leading them to leave the country. One speaker says Trump wanted to enforce immigration laws, but is not doing so, by breaking the law that allows refugees in cases of genocide. Another speaker says the current administration's refugee ban disproportionately affects black and brown people, citing examples of Cubans, Nicaraguans, Venezuelans, and Haitians being denied entry or deported. One speaker says America is still where the persecuted want to come, but another says white people are being allowed in while black and brown people are not. The debate continues regarding prioritizing refugees, with accusations of closed borders to certain people. One speaker says the American people prefer closed borders. Another speaker says the borders are closed to people seeking asylum. One speaker agrees that people who helped the American military deserve a chance to be here.

The speaker presents articles and videos depicting violence against white South Africans, claiming white South Africans are fleeing due to violence and racist laws. They cite attacks on white South African couples and the burning of white farmers. The speaker references President Trump's reaction to the situation, mentioning Trump asked about a jet that was given. The speaker claims officials are saying, "kill the white farmer and take their land." They state that friends who left South Africa warned that people there want to take land and kill.

Speaker 0 argues that the Palestinian people are oppressed and suffer under the occupation. They acknowledge Hamas is an armed group, but they describe Hamas as a reaction to signals of injustice and oppression by Israel. They assert that you cannot talk about peace without justice for Palestine and express a desire to know how the other person addresses that claim. Speaker 1 responds by reframing the situation as a political conflict, stating that while there is ideology involved, the core is colonization. They describe a situation where “a fence” surrounds the people, drones fly above, and “everything is taken over there.” They insist that the people in question are not there voluntarily and describe the people breaking out of their camp as something that provokes anger, calling that a “very peculiar viewpoint.” They further claim that Hamas is largely supported and founded by Mossad, arguing that it was very handy to have Hamas to respond to reactions in the area. Speaker 0 asks for evidence to support that claim. Speaker 1 confirms that evidence exists and says they will post it on Twitter after the conversation. They add that the evidence can also be found from the Israeli government or authorities, describing it as a very specific source.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they believe white people should pay reparations, claiming Speaker 1 tweeted in January 2020, "Yes, the North. Yes. All of us. Yes. America. Yes. Our original collective sin and unpaid debt. Yes. Reparations. Yes. On this day." Speaker 1 denies the tweet referred to fiscal reparations. Speaker 1 states the tweet referenced owing much to those who came before. Speaker 0 calls this a bizarre framing of the tweet.

Speaker 0: South Africa is, what, 75% black. Is that correct? 80%? That's right. Speaker 0: Why is it that once apartheid was removed why black South Africans were not able to see their material economic net worth go up in the last twenty or thirty years? Speaker 1: neocolonial control supply chains, and you own 72% of, you know, agriculture farmland. Speaker 1: Less than 3%. They are the richest racial group in America. Speaker 1: Land is basically all owned by white people in America. Speaker 1: One is driven in resentment and greed and envy and confiscation, and one is rooted in creation and entrepreneurship and optimism. I'd like to see the latter. Speaker 0: Let's work harder. Let's prove the boar wrong. Let's start a business.

Speaker 0 asserts that Joshua Zimmerman is “the Jew” who is a traitor and an enabler to murder, claiming that Jews engineered the destruction of South Africa and the rise of the African National Congress led by the convicted terrorist Nelson Mandela, whom Speaker 0 says “was in jail for acts of terrorism.” They state Mandela “was not an angel or humanitarian.” The speaker then condemns Julius Malema, alleging he is inciting crimes, and warns of “Genocidal Jews” across Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. Speaker 1 introduces Joshua Zimmerman as the person present in Ward 72 at Glen Hazel, saying they are there with fellow fighters to “conscientize the minds of those in the suburbs that the EFF is an all inclusive party regardless of race, class, or status,” and that “Slowly but surely, we are going to start winning more in the suburbs.” Speaker 2 leads chants: “Long live the commander in chief. Long live. Long live. Long live the commander in chief, Julius Malema. Long live. Long live. Viva EFF. Viva. Viva. Aman Clark. Away to.” Speaker 3 describes a crowd of “just under 100,000” chanting “kill the boar.” They identify the Boers as the remnant white South Africans who built South Africa, and say Julius Malema is leading the genocidal chant as head of the South African Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). They claim the Boer community was betrayed by liberal whites decades ago. They describe South Africa as once prosperous, now suffering under majority black rule, with unreliable electricity and a collapsed agricultural sector, labeling it an economic basket case of savagery typical of failed African states. They claim white people face daily violence and live in a state of siege, particularly those who did not leave after Mandela and the ANC took power. Speaker 3 provides context on the EFF as a South African far-left pan-Africanist and Marxist party founded by Julius Malema and allies in 2013, noting Malema serves as president and that the party is the third largest in both houses of Parliament and growing. They state the party “hasn’t yet started the mass killings of whites, but it will if Malema is to be believed.” They reference an October 2022 speech in which Malema told branch members they should “never be scared to kill.” They cite a 2018 rally where Malema urged supporters to “go after the white man” and proclaimed, “we are cutting the throat of whiteness.” They mention a 2016 rally where Malema said, “we are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now.” Speaker 3 notes that after Robert Mugabe’s death, Malema tweeted quotes hostile toward white people, including “the only white man you can trust is a dead white man,” and asserts that Malema has given warnings of white genocide. They claim that white people who acquiesce to replacement, mass immigration, or intercultural guilt narratives will face death, insisting: “Death follows. Be warned if your current white majority nation has adopted multiculturalism, diversity, and inclusion policies. It won’t end well.” The speakers claim the media hides the truth, leaving whites “supine and docile as they’re killed,” and reiterate Melena’s call: “Kill the whites.” They conclude with a call for whites to be racialists, meaning to defend their own kind.

The speaker says that to be convinced there is no white genocide in South Africa, President Trump would need to listen to the stories and perspectives of South Africans, including his friends. Another speaker claims there are thousands of stories, documentaries, and news stories about it. They show a video of what they claim are burial sites of over a thousand white farmers, with cars lined up to pay respects. They say each white cross represents a white farmer or their family member who was killed. The first speaker expresses unfamiliarity with the scene and asks where it is located. The other speaker says it is in South Africa. The first speaker says they need to find out where it is.

The speaker claims the media is corrupt and refuses to report on a situation in South Africa that is the "opposite of apartheid." According to the speaker, the media constantly reported on apartheid, but now "nobody knows" about the current situation. The speaker states that the U.S. is being "inundated with people, with white farmers from South Africa," creating "a big problem." Marco Rubio reportedly told the speaker that he has "never seen anything like" the number of people wanting to leave South Africa because they "feel they're gonna be dead very soon."

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they are ruling out the possibility of calling for the slaughter of white people in the future. Speaker 1 responds by saying they don't know what will happen and it may or may not be them. Speaker 0 clarifies that it could be Speaker 1 and asks what would necessitate that. Speaker 1 doesn't know and questions why they would do that. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to pledge to never call for the slaughter of white people, but Speaker 1 refuses to make that pledge. Speaker 0 understands.

I'm Jason Bartlett, a white South African who sought asylum in the US in 2019. South Africa is incredibly dangerous, with rampant crime and violence, especially targeting white farmers. The government's plan to expropriate land without compensation is devastating. While some claim South Africa is fine, that's not the reality for many. My family and I have experienced trauma and loss. We came to America to escape this, build a life, and contribute – I'm now a superintendent, farmer, and pilot. We're asking for intervention, not handouts, to protect the rights of farmers and prevent a Zimbabwe-like collapse. We urge President Trump, Elon Musk, and Joe Rogan to help spread awareness of this critical situation.

Speaker 0 claimed that white people make up 10% of the world's population, and that in California, the white population decreased by 71% in 73 years, which "kinda sounds like genocide." He questioned why violent crime and murder rates by race are not available from Sacramento. Speaker 1 interrupted, calling the statements racist and inappropriate for public discourse, and ended the call. Speaker 1 stated that racist tropes and stereotypes have no place in civic discourse.

Speaker 0 claims most people in the country voted for Trump and that he won the popular vote. Speaker 1 disputes this, stating it was a slim majority of voters and that too few people voted. Speaker 0 says those who cared about issues voted for Trump to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Speaker 1 counters that lots of voters were purged from voter rolls before the election. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of election denial. Speaker 1 accuses the "narcissist in that building" of gaslighting.

Speaker 1: "The narrative that they have pushed forward in the last ten years is that there is a relentless assault on against black people be on behalf of white people, and the data does not show that." Speaker 1: "White individuals are actually more likely to be attacked, especially even per capita, by black individuals in this country." Speaker 3: "it's just pure race race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong." Speaker 3: "Where is the George Floyd policing act? It didn't pass." Speaker 0: "The media doesn't care about this, and we should start asking why." Speaker 1: "All of a sudden, when we make the left live up to their own standard of rules, there is complete silence by the entire American media."

A genocide is taking place in South Africa that people don't want to write about. Farmers, who happen to be white, are being brutally killed and their land is being confiscated. The media doesn't talk about it, but if it were the other way around, it would be the only story. South Africa's leadership is coming to see me sometime next week. We're supposed to have a G20 meeting there, but I don't know how we can go unless that situation's taken care of. People who live in South Africa say it's a terrible situation. Citizenship has essentially been extended to those people to escape from that violence and come here.