TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all batches were from Pfizer and had varying mortality rates. The speaker mentioned that the expected mortality rate is 0.75, but these batches had much higher rates. They clarified that the batches included people of all ages and were not specific to any age group. The speaker highlighted batch number 1 with a 21% mortality rate and batch number 71 with a 4% rate. They concluded that the chances of these batches not being a killer are extremely low, with a statistician explaining that it would require dropping 100 billion people to obtain these statistics.

Some batches of the vaccine may have serious side effects or be degraded. The batch number can be checked to see what to expect. Documentation shows that certain batches have more serious adverse effects. Even the best batches from Pfizer and Moderna had a high rate of serious adverse events in the short term, around 1800.

The presentation examines the pattern of deployment of toxic vaccine batches using the VAERS dataset. It notes that the Covid vaccine was deployed in batches or lots, each with a number, and the batches are listed in VAERS in the order they were created, with adverse reactions recorded for each batch. A graph was produced with adverse reactions on the vertical axis and the sequence of batches in time on the horizontal axis, showing patterns of deployment in 2021. Each dot represents a batch, and the speaker highlights that about 95% of batches lie close to the x-axis, forming a thick line, with 80% of all batches generating only one or two adverse reaction reports and thus considered harmless. In contrast, the “clouds” and spikes above the x-axis represent toxic batches, with all such dots categorized as toxic. The breakdown given is: - 5% of all batches belong to these clouds and spikes. - The truly toxic batches generate 1,000 to 5,000 adverse reaction reports and are found above a red line, causing harm across every state in the USA where deployed. - These very toxic batches comprise about 0.65% of all batches (roughly one in 200). Total batches deployed in 2021 and recorded in VAERS: 28,330. Eighty percent are harmless (1–2 reports) within the x-axis line; the remaining 20% are more toxic, with the most extreme range up to 5,000 reports. Lesson two asks: “Who did it?” It identifies three companies appearing in VAERS: Moderna, Pfizer, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson). By filtering VAERS data in Excel, the speaker presents the contributions of each company to the toxic-batch deployment. In the full picture, Moderna accounts for every batch in the first half of the chart except two spikes pre- and post- Moderna, which are attributed to Janssen. Pfizer’s results (from their batches) match the latter half of the chart exactly, suggesting Pfizer appeared to have taken over supply for every USA batch in the latter portion. The deployment is described as carefully compartmentalized, with phases where Janssen, then Moderna, then Janssen again, and then Pfizer dominate in sequence, followed by Moderna exiting and Pfizer continuing. Lesson three describes the purpose behind Moderna’s deployment of toxic batches: Moderna appears to randomly distribute toxic batches, with the intention of harm, possibly to induce fear of a pandemic and justify stronger policies. Janssen’s initial spike is interpreted as a test before Moderna’s deployment. Pfizer is described as carrying out rigorous dosage testing, deploying the most lethal batches systematically and recording effects, and acting as the only company administering batches at that stage to avoid interference from others. Lesson four details the fine art of lethal dosage testing. Pfizer’s deployment is shown as highly clustered in time, forming distinct periods of toxic batches separated by intervals of harmless batches. Toxic batches cluster in discrete ranges (e.g., 3,000–2,500; 2,000–1,500; 1,500–1,000), with abrupt transitions between clusters and harmless periods. Toxicity ranges are not random but follow a stepwise, linear decline across clusters. The speaker concludes that Pfizer deployed highly toxic batches for discrete dosage testing across all states, implying thousands of hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths. The presentation ends by contrasting that 80% of batches are harmless, while a minority exhibit wide toxicity ranges, with claims of systematic, non-random deployment designed for testing, and notes an ironic statement about American exposure to what is described as German-led testing.

I am Max Melling, the statistician behind this study, with Viveke as the medical expert. The main result of our study is shown on the screen. It displays the number of adverse effects in each vaccine batch, based on official Danish data created for the study. Some batches are small, while others are large. Normally, a good vaccine would show a nearly perfect line, while a very bad vaccine would have scattered points. However, we observe three almost perfect lines, which is unexpected and suggests a problem with the product. Participants were unable to give informed consent due to the unknown risks. This is a concerning safety signal that requires further investigation.

The speaker analyzed data on the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They created a chart showing the batch ID, number of vaccinated individuals, and the number of deaths. The speaker confirmed that all batches discussed were from Pfizer. They specifically mentioned batch number 1, where 711 individuals were vaccinated and 152 of them died, resulting in a 21% mortality rate.

Studies show that more people who received the injections are ending up in the hospital and dying. Repeat injections can lead to tolerance issues by the immune system, preventing an effective immune response. The speaker is focused on the damages caused by these products and believes that the voices of the injured have been taken away. They hypothesize that the spike protein in the injections could cause hyper inflammation, especially in people with preexisting conditions. The speaker also mentions that the contents of the injection were supposed to remain at the injection site, but evidence suggests they can travel to the ovaries. They suspect that there is information being withheld from the public.

There are four studies indicating significant lot variability in certain batches. Early 2021 batches appeared to be the most dangerous. Some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while others have almost none, essentially being "duds," possibly due to degraded mRNA or manufacturing issues. Some batches decimated people and may be contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids, mRNA, or even heavy metals. No batch appeared to be the same.

Young athletes have experienced cardiac side effects from the shots. However, some people who get the shots have no side effects at all. A study from Denmark found that about a third of the shots have no side effects, while another 70% have mild side effects. The remaining 4.2% of shots in a high-risk batch have more severe side effects. Each vial of the vaccine can vary in its contents, so it's a matter of luck whether someone gets a high-risk injection or not. There is no quality control over the batches, including the amount of messenger RNA or any impurities.

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all of these batches were from Pfizer. The mortality rates ranged from 21% to 4%. The speaker explained that these batches included people from all age groups and vaccination centers, so it wasn't specific to one age group. They mentioned that the chances of these results occurring naturally by chance are extremely low, indicating that the vaccine may be causing deaths. They estimated that to obtain these statistics, they would have had to vaccinate 100 billion people, while they currently have data for 2.2 million individuals.

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all of these batches were from Pfizer. The mortality rates ranged from 21% to 4%. The speaker explained that these batches included people from all age groups and vaccination centers, so it wasn't specific to one age group. They stated that the chances of these results occurring naturally by chance are extremely low, suggesting that the vaccine may be causing deaths. They estimated that to obtain these statistics, they would have had to vaccinate 100 billion people, while they have only vaccinated 2.2 million.

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all batches were from Pfizer and had varying mortality rates. The speaker mentioned that the normal mortality rate is 0.75%, while the batches ranged from 4% to 21%. They clarified that the batches included all age groups and were not specific to one age group. The speaker highlighted that the chances of these batches not being a killer were extremely low, with odds of 100 billion to 1. They emphasized that statistically, there is no chance that the vaccine is not causing deaths.

The speaker describes a cascade of harms from mRNA injections, asserting that different individuals experience a variety of issues because the injections initiate chaos at the transcriptomic level. A recent study is cited as proof, noting that the process regulates thousands of gene expressions that are critical for immune regulation and mitochondrial function, and it purportedly invokes cancerous activity by suppressing tumor suppressor genes p53 and BRCA. The speaker says this occurs at the transcriptomic level, and references another study from the prior week that shows proteomically that the proteins produced from the dysregulated transcription are defective, contributing to a range of issues. Moving up to the next tier in the cascade, the speaker describes biochemical changes following injection. After vaccination, there are elevated inflammatory markers such as CRP, and increases in BNP and various cardiac enzymes, which are presented as indications of cardiac damage. The implication is that these biochemical changes reflect downstream harms. At the final tier, the speaker connects these molecular and biochemical disturbances to clinical outcomes. The claimed clinical harms include myocarditis, clotting syndrome, strokes, and cancers. The overall narrative is that the mRNA injections initiate a multi-tier cascade—from transcriptomic disruptions affecting gene regulation, immune function, and mitochondrial activity, through proteomic consequences with defective proteins, to biochemical signals of inflammation and cardiac injury, culminating in a range of clinical conditions. The speaker emphasizes that the referenced studies are either recent or in progress. One study is described as having been “proved” and is on the preprint server undergoing peer review, while another study is noted as having appeared “last week,” illustrating the progression from transcriptomic changes to proteomic outcomes. The sequence of claims is structured as a tiered pathway—transcriptomic, proteomic, biochemical, and clinical—culminating in diverse harms observed in some vaccinated individuals, with the assertion that the effects vary by person due to the initial chaotic molecular changes. The clinical spectrum listed includes myocarditis, clotting syndrome, strokes, and cancers, linked to the preceding molecular and biochemical alterations.

The speaker discusses a paper from Denmark that reveals a significant variation in suspected adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. The data shows a 1,000-fold difference in incidence depending on the batch of vaccines administered. This information is currently gaining popularity.

Studies show that more people who received the injections are ending up in the hospital and dying. Repeat injections can lead to tolerance issues by the immune system, preventing an effective immune response. The speaker is concerned about the damages caused by these products and believes that the voices of the injured have been silenced. They suggest that the potential cytotoxicity of the spike protein should have been considered before proceeding. The exclusion criteria in the original trials excluded people with preexisting autoimmune conditions, which may be related to hyper inflammation. The speaker believes that the adverse events reported are a result of systemic damage caused by the spike protein. They also mention that the contents of the injection were expected to remain at the injection site, but evidence suggests that lipid nanoparticles can travel to the ovaries. The speaker suspects that there is information being withheld from the public.

Key points: "the vials that were in fact approved are not the vials that were given to the public." The clinical trial used "process one that used PCR to make the DNA that was going to then turn into the RNA to make the spike protein." After the trial, "they switched" to a production process that "manufactured this DNA in E. Coli," introducing endotoxin risk. "There are these plasmids that have additional DNA that were not present in the actual clinical trial." Sequencing found mixtures, including "expired" and samples that had "been tapped into." Regarding Pfizer, "the Pfizer vaccines actually had a component that was not disclosed to the regulators." "The plasmid map on the right is what was disclosed to the EMA" with "no mention of the SV40 components" now "inside this DNA sequence." "The plasma on the left is what we actually found," with components not disclosed to regulators nor to patients. Monovalent Pfizer; prior ones were the bivalent vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which may have been changed during production or transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The Vice President of Pfizer admitted to building the plane while flying, and we have shown that one wing has fallen off. There is a safety issue that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and national institutions should have addressed and informed the public about. Our study also suggests a potential link between certain cancers and different vaccine batches. We have observed increased mortality rates in European countries since May 21st. The EMA should have reacted to these findings and halted vaccinations or at least withdrawn the problematic batches. As a concerned citizen and doctor, I expected more action from the EMA. Thank you.

The speaker discusses the severe damage caused by multiple doses of a certain substance, suggesting that taking it once is enough. They mention leaked documents from Pfizer and Moderna, revealing different lot numbers and formulations. The FDA's role is to ensure uniformity and safety across the country, but the speaker claims that different concentrations and ingredients were used, resulting in varying effects. Some lots were found to be 5000% more lethal than others. The speaker suggests that this variation was intentional to prevent clear correlation and discourage people from realizing they were being poisoned.

There are four studies that show lot variability, significant lot variability. The early twenty twenty one batches were actually the most dangerous it appeared. Some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while some lots are linked to no adverse events really at all. And they're basically batches called duds. Right? Probably the mRNA is degraded or it's been left out of the refrigerator for too long or the manufacturing process was a bust and it wasn't manufactured properly. Thankfully right for those individuals. But, yeah, some of these batches, they just decimated people and they're probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from a manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, even heavy metal contamination has been detected in these batches. So all sorts of things. But, yeah, really no batch appeared to be the same.

Stainless steel particles were found in Moderna vaccines in Japan, and a few people died after receiving them. The speaker questions how these particles made it into the vaccines and expresses disbelief that such a serious issue went unnoticed. They compare it to their experience in a pharmacy, where any contamination would result in losing their license. The speaker believes the vaccine is of poor quality and could be considered adulterated. They criticize the regulatory authorities for failing to ensure good manufacturing practices and highlight variations in batches and vials. The speaker suggests recalling the vaccines and reevaluating the manufacturing process. They doubt that the product can meet consistent manufacturing standards.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which were later changed, possibly due to Pfizer altering the product or during transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The study also reveals a safety issue that both Pfizer and regulatory institutions should have addressed. Pfizer had already informed the European Medicines Agency (EMA) about the safety problem in August 2021. Our data from Sweden indicates that this is a European issue, not just a Danish one. We are concerned about long-term side effects and their potential links to cancer and increased mortality rates. The EMA should have taken action based on the data and informed the public. The vice-president of Pfizer's statement about building the plane while flying is apt, as we have shown that one wing has fallen off.

The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA. This DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction. This was discovered by sequencing vials of Pfizer vaccine from Colombia. It's surprising that there's any DNA in there. The speaker is alarmed about the possible consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. Mixing DNA with a lipid complex allows it to enter cells and become a permanent fixture. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and could cause a sustained autoimmune attack. There is also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. The risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we ought to figure out if this is happening or not.

Approximately 15% of people are injured by COVID-19 vaccines, with around 2.5% experiencing heart damage. The pharmaceutical industry suggests that not all vaccine vials are the same. It has been discovered that 80% of deaths from Pfizer vaccines come from 30% of the lots, while 80% of deaths from Moderna vaccines come from 20% of the lots. These lots may have varying concentrations of genetic material and contaminants, affecting their quality. This issue is currently receiving significant attention.

RNA sequencing of the Moderna vaccine's three prime ends suggests a possible mechanism for RNA persistence: in vivo re-adenylation. The data indicates plasmid DNA contamination despite efforts to reduce it. The data also reveals contamination from other mRNA vaccines in Moderna's pipeline. The speaker suggests that with widespread DNA sequencing capabilities, tolerating incorrect RNA sizes in vaccines is irresponsible. Sequencing before approval would have allowed for a better understanding of low RNA scores before global administration.

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all of these batches were from Pfizer. Batch number 1 had 711 vaccinated and 152 deaths, resulting in a 21% mortality rate. The expected mortality rate is 0.75%. These batches included all age groups, not specific to one age group. Other batches in the top 10 had mortality rates of 17%, 15%, and 4%. The speaker concludes that the chances of these batches not being a killer are extremely low, with odds of $100,000,000,000 to 1.

These batches are different. So yep. So so many people, nobody even really got the same product. The quality control was so bad. Some people got a tiny dose of the mRNA. Some people got a massive dose depending on the batch. And you can check your batch at howbadismybatch.com, which uses the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, and it'll tell you how many people died from this batch, how many reports of blood clots were there from my batch? So that's an important tool you can use to see, what the possible risks you you you might face, regarding your injection.