reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Cell phone towers and 5G radiation concerns are unfounded. Even if you had cell phones around your head and genitals, there would be no need to worry. One person believed his cell phone caused his bone cancer, but there is no evidence to support this. Radiation from cell phones is not the same as that from nuclear bombs. Everything emits radiation, but it's the wavelength that matters. Only high-frequency radiation like ultraviolet and beyond can cause DNA damage. Your phone's radiation is nowhere near that level.

- My concern about five g is that the RF radiation from five g is dangerous. - It penetrates the it it disrupts the blood brain barrier. - It also is associated with glioblastomas and other cancers. - And there are literally thousands and thousands of studies in that. - I've litigated on that issue, and I've won in the Federal Court of Appeals. - Other countries regulate it much better than us, and we need to protect our children. - We should not be having these antennas on elementary schools. - We should be warning people appropriately. - Do not put that cell phone next year ahead. - Oh, you know, we're we're seeing this epidemic now of glioblastomas, and almost all of them are connected to the year that you favor the cell phone with. - There are study after study that shows that, and I'm in litigation on that issue right now.

To switch a phone from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims there are zero long-term studies of 5G. A senator questioned industry representatives about funding for 5G studies and was told there are no active industry-backed studies. The speaker suggests that people are the study and advises against using new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches. The speaker claims 5G is tested on plastic dummies and implies it is unsafe for humans.

Speaker 0: Kevin Matas, with the California Brain Tumor Association, collaborates with emfscientist.org and other groups—two hundred doctors and scientists from 39 countries—who have looked at health effects from wireless radiation. From their work and others, we can clearly say that wireless radiation can cause cancer, neurological problems, immune system disorders, and reproductive harm. Our scientists, along with other groups, include people developing wireless health effects from various sources—brain tumors from cell phone radiation, neurological symptoms from Wi-Fi in schools, neurological and cancerous health effects from simple smart meters. Smart meters are wireless meters on homes to avoid manual readings. Regardless of the source, the health effects can be the same. Cell towers are the most powerful source of wireless radiation emissions. What brings me here today is the rollout of five Gs technology, which is very different from 2G, 3G, and 4G. This is because the wireless radiation uses a higher frequency. Our current wireless technology uses about 1 gigahertz to 4 gigahertz; this new five G technology is ultra high frequency, ultra high intensity, at 24 gigahertz to 90 gigahertz. To put this in perspective, 90 gigahertz is 90,000,000,000 electromagnetic waves per second hitting your body. We know people are already getting sick from the lower frequencies and we expect, our scientists expect, that these higher ultra high frequency microwaves are going to bring people to disease quicker and in a more intense form. The other problem with five G technology is these microwaves are very short. Old microwaves were about two and a half to three feet long; these are now about an inch to a half an inch long, and they don't travel very well. So they're going to have to put a little cell tower transmitter in front of about every two to 10 homes. This is a big problem because cancer rates around regular cell towers are about three or four times what they are normally, so we’re seeing a lot of things. It’s going to be continuous exposure as with other cell towers, but it will be emitting a much more higher frequency, high intensity wireless radiation. Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, not only are these five G death towers going to double cancer rates in our country, they are going to be used to target individuals in a way never seen before. Since most people keep their smartphones on them like a tracking device, and since their political profiles are linked to their phones, it only makes sense that this is going to be an easy way to target people silently and without a trace. As you can see with these new five G death towers, they are going to be focusing beams of high frequency energy at a user's location. These five G death towers are in fact particle beam weapons that can be aimed at people. These particle beams move at the speed of light and track you wherever you go, and in most cases you'll be hit with particle beams coming from multiple directions. This truly is a national emergency considering who controls this technology. You saw how the IRS targeted conservatives. You saw how the FBI covered up the Las Vegas and Hillary investigations. Well, what do you think this beast system is going to do with Christians and conservatives on their networks? Zap, zap, and double zap. That's what admit it. That's what you would do if you were doctor evil. You'd poison the food, the air, the water, and you'd use these death towers to slowly induce cancer. Have no doubt about it. These five G death towers are bad news any way you look at it. So go to your city council meetings. Protest these bad boys from coming up in your neighborhood before it's too late. If you're listening to this, you are the resistance.

Cell phone radiation is harmful and can cause cancer, including glioblastoma. It also affects the blood-brain barrier. Despite being labeled a conspiracy theory, I won a case in front of the Court of Appeals. Conspiracy theories are simply things the government doesn't want you to know or think about.

Speaker 0 asserts that microwave radiation around people is severely limited by practical constraints, yet cites a report from the Army on millimeter waves that references three hundred fifty studies showing clear biological effects even below thermal thresholds and below established safety guidelines. The claim emphasizes that the subjects in these studies were aware of what was happening in a substantial portion of cases, ranging from thirty percent to eighty percent, because skin and eyes are disproportionately affected by wireless radiation. The argument is that such exposure would impact the skin and nerves, thereby affecting the entire nervous system, and would also expose eyes to military-grade wireless radiation. The speaker further contends that this exposure would involve placing directed radiation in front of people’s homes and forcing it into their rooms, describing the situation as absolutely absurd. A video is mentioned from FCC proceedings in which one of the five G engineers reportedly states that directed beams are being aimed into people’s windows at levels not permitted in their own safety laboratories or safety guidelines. The speaker reiterates that the FCC did not treat this as a pressing issue, describing the stance as shrugging it off and indicating that it isn’t something to be discussed at that time. Key points highlighted include: - The Army report on millimeter waves referencing three hundred fifty studies showing biological effects below thermal and safety guideline levels. - A significant portion of study subjects purportedly aware of the exposure, due to the skin and eyes absorbing a disproportionate share of wireless radiation. - The assertion that exposure could affect the skin and nervous system, with particular emphasis on neurological impacts and ocular exposure. - The claim that directed beams could be placed in front of residential windows and forced into people’s rooms, described as absurd. - A video excerpt from FCC proceedings where a five-G engineer supposedly admits to directing beams into people’s windows at levels not allowed in safety labs. - The speaker’s claim that the FCC dismissed the issue as not needing discussion at that moment. Overall, the speaker builds a narrative that there are documented biological effects at non-thermal exposure levels, that individuals could be knowingly exposed in everyday environments, and that regulatory bodies have not treated the issue with the urgency or seriousness implied by the presented evidence.

The speaker argues that microwaves from wireless devices are causing widespread cancer and other illnesses. Key points include: - Women often keep their cell phones in front pockets, and men keep them in pant pockets; the speaker claims these placements cause cancers—prostate cancer for men and colon cancer for women—because of microwaving of the organs. - The cell phone is described as created by Raytheon (the Department of Defense), and studies allegedly showed that exposure to microwaves led to cancer and various illnesses. - The claim is made that if phones are not on airplane mode and WiFi/Bluetooth are not off, the phone constantly updates and pings the microwave frequency to that area, leading to tumors and lumps. - The speaker links wireless technology to the pandemic, claiming that the rollout of 5G in 2020, with phones upgraded and towers installed in front of homes, was the root cause of the pandemic; Laura is cited as saying it also causes infertility. - The speaker references the book Zapping of America, stating that when men were exposed to microwaves (and females as well), there was a higher chance of delivering female babies. The claim continues that men are vanishing and females are ballooning as microwave exposure increases with more cell phones and towers, i.e., more wireless technology. - The Invisible Rainbow is cited as discussing wireless exposure as the root cause of these health issues, implying that this topic is not commonly discussed. - The overall narrative connects personal device usage and wireless infrastructure to a broad pattern of cancers (prostate, colon), infertility, skewed sex ratios, and population changes, framing these as direct outcomes of microwave exposure from modern wireless technology.

My concern about 5G is that its RF radiation is dangerous. It can penetrate the blood-brain barrier and is linked to glioblastomas and other cancers, along with various health issues. There are thousands of studies supporting this. I've litigated on this topic and won in federal court, similar to a case involving Monsanto and glyphosate. 5G is under-regulated in the U.S. compared to other countries, and we need to protect our children. We shouldn't have antennas on elementary schools, and people should be warned not to keep cell phones next to their heads. There's an alarming rise in glioblastomas, many associated with cell phone use, and I'm currently involved in litigation on this matter. If given a fair trial, I believe we will succeed.

The speaker believes 5G RF radiation is dangerous, disrupting the blood-brain barrier and causing glioblastomas, other cancers, and dramatic health effects. They claim there are thousands of studies supporting this and that they have litigated and won on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. They also won a case against Monsanto regarding glyphosate and Hodgkin's lymphoma, which was also called a conspiracy theory. The speaker asserts 5G is under-regulated in the US compared to other countries. They advocate for protecting children by not placing antennas on elementary schools and warning people about cell phone usage, citing an epidemic of glioblastomas linked to the ear favored for cell phone use. They state there are many studies showing this and that they are currently in litigation on this issue.

Speaker 0 notes an interesting image: in beautiful nature, people will build a fortress to protect a cell phone tower. They remind that in 1996, Bill Clinton passed an act to protect cell phone towers from lawsuits. The speaker asserts that if this act leads to brain cancer or a tumor or any type of illness, one cannot sue for damages. They compare this to vaccines. The speaker describes this as “pretty crazy” and something to think about. They then claim, “And now you know what caused the pandemic.” They state that while people were locked in their houses, cell phone towers were going up all over the place. A map is mentioned to illustrate this.

Speaker 0 explains how to switch from 5G to LTE: Settings, then cellular data, five g plus or five g, turn that to LTE or four g; it takes less than five seconds. He claims, "you'll start feeling better, you won't have headaches, you'll probably get your sense of smell better, you won't be dizzy anymore, have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five gs is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." "But they're not gonna tell you that because that gets censored." He adds, "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." There were people who testified in front of Congress asking, "do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now." "Happy to visit with you as to what opportunities you think there needs to be more studies, and we're always for more science." "We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "Let me follow-up with you, senator. To my knowledge, there's no active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff. That's why I don't use AirPods and smartwatches and all the other stuff because you don't know what you're putting into your body or doing to your body. That's for sure." Speaker 0: "And they're gonna sell it as safe because they tested it on a plastic dummy. So you gotta ask yourself, do you wanna be the plastic dummy? I don't want to. That's for sure."

The speaker describes a legal victory, stating that they won a major suit against the Federal Communications Commission in the court of appeals for lying to the public about cell phone radiation and cell phone safety. He claims that, as a result, the FCC must go back and redo all of its regulations concerning cell phones. He presents this as a corrective action prompted by the truth about radiation and safety, implying that prior rules were incorrect or misleading. Moving to specific cautions, he asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head, and you should not let the phone be carried in a front pocket. He adds that, if the user is a girl, you should not allow the cell phone to be carried in a breast pocket. He further warns against carrying the device anywhere near the ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head when you are talking, the better off you are, framing distance as a key factor in reducing exposure. The speaker reinforces his position by claiming a vast body of scientific support, stating that there are tens of thousands of studies that show the really extreme dangers of cell phone radiation. He contends that these dangers are not receiving adequate attention from the public. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he urges listeners not to allow this practice. He asserts that this proximity at night is a common and troubling habit that increases exposure. Finally, he offers a practical nighttime precaution, suggesting that you should try to get the phone away from children at night so they can obtain eight hours of sleep without the device near them. He frames this as an important safety measure, implying that reducing overnight exposure is a simple and essential step. Throughout, the overall message is presented as a safety-focused stance grounded in legal action and cited studies, urging immediate adherence to the proximity and placement guidelines to minimize cell phone radiation exposure.

The speaker claims to have won a suit in the court of appeals against the FCC, alleging the agency lied to the public about cell phone radiation and safety, and asserts that the FCC must redo its regulations on cell phones. He asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head and should avoid carrying it in front pockets; for girls, he says not to carry the phone in the breast pocket and to keep it away from ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head during a call, the better. He asserts, “there are tens of thousands of studies” showing the extreme dangers of cell phone radiation and claims that people are not paying attention. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he advises against that. He recommends removing the cell phone at night so that children can get eight hours without it and stresses that this is really important.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about cell phone radiation effects on animals. - Retain the quantitative detail: “20 times below the legal safety limit” and the mention of a “weaker form.” - Capture the comparison between weaker exposure and stronger levels (5G/4G) and the claimed effects. - Report the specific harms cited: brain damage, neurodevelopmental issues, DNA damage in stem cells. - Include the assertion that studies not funded by big tech/cellular industry report deleterious effects (oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities). - Avoid adding commentary, evaluation, or new information not in the transcript. - Translate to English if needed and preserve exact phrases where possible. Subjected rats to to cell phone radiation, like normal cell phone radiation, not four g, five g, even a weaker form. They exposed them at 20 times below the legal safety limit, and it caused brain damage and neurodevelopmental issues in these rats. Like, it was causing DNA damage in stem cells. So, I mean, it's just it just decimates the number what you Just said. 20 times below the legal limit, but you were saying this wasn't even five g. This was a weaker a weaker signal, and it was doing that. So what is the five g doing? What are the stronger levels doing? Yeah. The stronger levels are absolutely terrible. Every time they test the biological effects of five g, four g, and they're not funded by big tech and big cellular industry, they always find extremely deleterious biological effects, including oxidative stress, including DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities. Right? All these things. So it's not good for any any bodily system.

The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.

My concern about 5G is that its RF radiation is dangerous. It disrupts the blood-brain barrier and is linked to glioblastomas and other cancers, causing significant health issues. There are thousands of studies supporting these claims. I've successfully litigated on this topic in federal court, as well as on issues related to glyphosate and its connection to Hodgkin's lymphoma. 5G is under-regulated in the U.S. compared to other countries, and we need to protect our children. We shouldn't have antennas on elementary schools, and people should be warned not to keep cell phones near their heads. There's an alarming rise in glioblastomas, many associated with cell phone use, and I am currently involved in litigation regarding this issue.

The speaker expresses concern about the dangers of 5G radiation, stating that it disrupts the blood-brain barrier and is linked to cancer. They mention winning a case on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. The speaker believes that 5G is under-regulated compared to other countries and calls for better protection, especially for children. They argue against placing antennas on elementary schools and advise against holding cell phones next to the head. The speaker claims that there is an epidemic of glioblastomas connected to cell phone use and mentions ongoing litigation. They reject the idea of blindly trusting experts, emphasizing the importance of individual research and questioning in a democracy.

Speaker 0 describes higher frequencies as potentially impacting bees and insects because the wave size can resonate with insect size, leading to greater absorption. He shows a study with heat-map images of higher frequencies on the honeybee, noting five insects were examined and bees at different life stages were tested; higher frequencies resonated with the bees and were more highly absorbed, potentially causing biochemical changes that can affect bee behavior. He notes other studies on their website showing impacts to honey production and bee reproduction, including cases where bees did not return to a hive when wireless radiation was near it. Speaker 1 states, “For decades, there has been irrefutable evidence that electromagnetic waves have an influence both thermally and non thermally on living beings, including people.” Speaker 2 adds that five g has triggered irrational fears, but experts are concerned, and Daniel Favre is among hundreds of scientists who think precautionary steps should be taken. Favre signed appeals to the United Nations and European Union asking for the health effects of it to be reassessed. Danielle has been looking into the impact of electromagnetic fields on honeybees for years. Speaker 1 elaborates: in a practical setup, a cell phone emits the waves while another phone receives the waves, and a device records the sound of the colony in the beehive via a microphone under the hive. The waveform thickening indicates greater colony sound intensity; when phones are active, the colony is disturbed, and once the phone is off, the colony returns to normal noise. Speaker 2 emphasizes that implementing five g safely for people and the environment requires more time for independent research and for digesting information from thousands of published papers, citing Enrico Stura, an electronic engineer specializing in molecular biophysics. Speaker 1 adds that “The electromagnetic waves produced by personal telecommunication systems during reasonable periods of time lead to demonstrable and proven DNA damages.” Speaker 0 references a study on radio frequency radiation injuries around mobile phone base stations, conducted as a field study for years, observing trees in line of sight of cell antennas showing damage that led to felled trees over time. He notes photographs showing the antenna and the crown fitting, and mentions studies on impacts to plants, stressing the broader concern about widespread antennas in Montgomery County, the United States, and the world.

The transcript argues that smartphone design and settings are highly intentional and may be aimed at managing health risks related to radiation exposure. It claims that a phone’s settings can show how far it must be kept away from the body to “prevent cancer,” highlighting an “RF exposure” section. The speaker describes navigating the phone interface: going to Settings, then General, then scrolling to Legal and Regulatory, and clicking the item at the very bottom labeled “RF exposure,” which stands for radio frequency exposure. They say the phone displays a required separation distance from the body, claiming the speaker’s device lists about “five millimeters separation off of your body,” compared to the size of a pencil eraser. They state that this coverage is meant to reduce risk from using the phone against the body, specifically saying it is “covered when you get brain cancer because you put your phone to your head.” The speaker emphasizes using speaker phone rather than holding the phone to the head. The transcript also claims that a newly released study found that the further the phone is away from the body, “the better,” and it links this to higher rates of testicular cancer in young men, alleging that placing phones near the testicles contributes to increased risk. It further claims that when phones were smaller and women put them in their breast, there were cases of breast cancers matching “the shape of that lithium battery in there.” Finally, the speaker advises keeping phones off the body, not putting phones to the head, and avoiding use in conditions like driving “down a road in a metal tube,” where the phone supposedly works harder to find a cell signal and emits more electromagnetic fields.

- The speaker discusses a potential connection between electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and diabetes, noting that there has been a slight increase in diabetes rates associated with the rapid expansion of cellular towers, such as after Bill Clinton’s policy changes. - They acknowledge that EMR is not claimed to be the sole cause of diabetes, but suggest that historical data and curves make it tempting to believe EMR could be a significant factor. - The speaker points out that the topic has been present in scientific literature since at least 1931, and asserts that conventional medicine would push back against this viewpoint, with medical education focused on sugar and other factors. - They emphasize that they are not naive and do not claim EMR is the only cause; rather, the implication is that EMR could contribute to diabetes risk. - The argument culminates in a warning: if power systems and telecommunications infrastructure are not designed more carefully, there will be health and national budget costs, implying broader consequences for public health and economic burden.

Dinosaurs are not real, but dragons are. Our sky is being sprayed with poison and nanobots. Climate change is not real, at least not in the way they tell you it is. They're just using it to limit your travel, taxi more, and sell you new products like electric vehicles. Fluoride is calcifying your pineal gland to disconnect you from the divine power within you. Cathedrals and other architectural wonders were not just buildings; they were part of a grid for free energy. Israel did nine eleven. Bill Gates created ticks that can make you allergic to red meat. Viruses have never been proven in a lab. They're basically a boogeyman. All vaccines cause rates of illness to skyrocket. Yes, Susan, even the polio one. Government is just organized crime with a fancy name. The World Economic Forum talks about depopulating the earth. These are the people making decisions for your health. Hospitals literally kill people to harvest their organs and sell them on the black market. The air force has direct energy weapons, and they use them to create natural disasters so then they can take the land for dirt cheap. They also use geoengineering to create and control large storms for the same purpose. Modern farming is destroying the soil and leaving our food with little to no nutrients. If you go to most grocery stores, by the time your food makes it to the table, it has zero nutritional value, either buy local or buy frozen. Seed oils cause heart problems, not butter and healthy fats. The runoff water from the chemical they use in nonstick pans causes birth defects and poisoned an entire community that lived near a DuPont facility. Watch the Devil We Know documentary. This is what you're cooking your food in. The government can use frequency manipulation to alter your brain waves. Five g and six g were not created for faster phone service. People who live closer to electrical facilities and five g towers have a higher likelihood of cancer. They're poisoning your food, air, water, and personal products because they want you to be gay and retarded. Conspiracy theorists don't tell you these things to make you depressed and nihilistic. We tell you so that you can make empowered decisions for yourself and your family. We don't get out of this mess by putting our heads in the sand.

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.

Today’s discussion centers on Elon Musk and the technocrat, claiming that "Matt from Cultivate LV lacks medical credentials on five g, and there's no link of any dangers of five g or WiFi," and that AI has been programmed to say this. It references "the studies done by the US Navy in 1971 of 2,000 studies on the biological responses to radio frequencies, five gs wireless, and microwave radiation." It lists side effects: "impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, hallucinations, sleepiness, insomnia, restlessness, chest pain, no side effects," plus "hair loss." It notes that in 1996, "Bill Clinton signs an act to protect cell phone towers from lawsuits," and claims "No dangers," including that "insurance companies don't cover cell phone companies." It adds that "cell phone safety testing is done on a plastic dummy" and that "The safety standard in The US, Canada, and Australia ... is off the charts, while in other countries, actually very low." It links "the rollout of five g" to the "root cause of the pandemic" and ends with "Here you go."

"Never ever ever put a cell phone on your ear." "Tell your kids. I'm gonna prove it to you and to them." "This right here is measuring." "So we're at point two, point six. Now watch it when it comes closer. 28, 33, 29, 39." "Do you see the difference?" "What was that?" ""30 times the amount of radiation going into my head." "Always use speakerphone." "Make sure your kids see this because they're the biggest offenders." "Oh, and don't put it back in your pocket." "If you put it on your body, always have it on airplane mode."