reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I opened my DHS mail and found out they took my food stamps. This happened because of an incident last week where I dumped soda cans in a Walmart parking lot to get cash, which I've done before. The police officer said he could have arrested me but chose not to; however, he reported it to the state. Now, they want me to repay $23,678 from the past year. I can't afford groceries without those food stamps, so I don't know how they expect me to pay it back. It seems unfair since I relied on government assistance, and now I'm facing this repayment.

Hidden cameras captured LA Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) employees throwing away taxpayer-funded food meant for the homeless. Boxes of food, including fresh sandwiches, apples, and water, were seen being discarded into the trash. This occurred repeatedly, almost daily, despite the food being in unopened packages labeled "eat good food." One person stated that with tens of thousands of homeless individuals in LA, the food was not being distributed. Another person claimed this was a theft of taxpayer dollars, as employees are paid to serve and care for the homeless, and are instead throwing away valuable food.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the issue of retirement and government assistance. They express frustration with the current system, highlighting the disparity between those who have worked their whole lives and receive minimal pensions, and those who have never worked and receive similar benefits. They question the value of working if the financial benefits are minimal compared to the costs of childcare and other expenses. They argue that as long as the government continues to provide generous assistance, people will choose not to work. They also worry about the example this sets for future generations.

I'm seeing a lot of unfairness in South Florida. Long-term residents, some who arrived from Cuba 45 years ago, retire on Social Security checks of $800-$1000 a month after a lifetime of work. Yet, new arrivals from Cuba, sometimes just months in the country, receive $1500 monthly in benefits as refugees, even if they are able-bodied and not working. I've seen cases where these refugees then make frequent trips back to Cuba. They receive extensive government aid – Medicaid, food stamps, healthcare, and cash payments. It's frustrating to see people who have contributed to this country for decades receiving less than those who recently arrived. This disparity is unjust and needs to be addressed.

Neil Bonner and Saul Elisme for large scale SNAP benefit trafficking, a scheme that turned a program designed to feed families into a multimillion dollar criminal enterprise. Stat benefits are also known as food stamps. The defendants are charged with one count of food stamp fraud. As alleged in the charging documents, these men abused one of the government's most critical safety net programs for their own financial gain. This is a tack this is taxpayer money meant to keep people from going hungry. These defendants decided to take it for themselves. These defendants exchanged SNAP benefits for cash, which they pocketed. Bonner, a national a national naturalized US citizen from Haiti, owned the Jesuela variety store. Elise May, a lawful permanent resident also from Haiti, owned the Saul Massey Mixe store. These two businesses were colocated within a single storefront in Boston. To be certain, these were not supermarkets. They were not full service groceries. It would be a huge stretch to even call them convenience stores. In fact, the only thing convenient about these stores was how easy it was to commit SNAP benefit fraud. To put this in perspective, the Jasuela variety store is less than a 150 square feet in size, smaller than some bathrooms. The Sao Mache Mixe store was approximately 500 square feet in space. By contrast, a supermarket can be 20,000 to 60,000 square feet in size, have a dozen or more registers, and employ numerous employees. Both the Disuela variety and Sao Mache Mixe stores had one register, no carriages, no handbaskets, and very little food for sale. One legitimate supermarket in the same area as these stores redeems approximately $80,000 in SNAP benefits per month. Over the last twenty months, the Jesuela store was redeeming between three and six times that amount monthly with nowhere near the space, inventory, customers, or infrastructure to support it. The Sao Mache Mixe store redeemed over a $120,000 in SNAP benefits in the last six months. Simply put, there is no plausible way SNAP eligible food could have been purchased from these stores for this long. Yet these two stores are alleged to have illicitly trafficked nearly $7,000,000 in SNAP benefits. The fraud was shocking and glaring.

We should not be subsidizing obesity. Welch juices. Got two cases of these. A box of Sam's brain chips. They got these chips. Timmy toe crunch. Ballpark hotdogs. Some teriyaki the teriyaki noodles. Some kind of A pack of ground beef. Pecos on the steaks. Seed and salt. Pecos. Powder donuts. I mean, I got hypertension just from watching it. I died of a heart attack, came back to life, and then got diabetes and died again, then came back to life again, all while we were watching that. Nothing but processed junk food. Nothing no real food. This goes on for four or five minutes. This woman is showing off all the stuff she bought. She bought a a truckload of stuff with EBT, and none of it is food.

Speaker 0 describes their experience working in county social services and their political shift from Democrat to Republican. They explain how, for benefits programs, the presence of a social security number allows workers to determine if an applicant is working, has bank money, property, cars, tax income, and other sources, enabling assessment of eligibility and amount. They claim a loophole exists for undocumented individuals. If an undocumented person applies for benefits and qualifies, they can receive full Medicaid, housing, migrant head start, and fully paid childcare. They note that if the undocumented parent has US citizen children, those children qualify for all the benefits and services as well. The speaker emphasizes that for an undocumented parent applying for benefits for their children, workers cannot tell if the family has banking income, property, or tax payments, since the parent lacks a social security number. The speaker provides specific benefit amounts they observed: “$1,200 per kid plus $275 per person cash food stamps,” and adds that this does not include housing and “all the other benefits they get.” They state that in California, these benefits are not hidden. They recount anecdotes of people arriving with “nails did, hair done blonde, Gucci bags, Gucci glasses, driving up on escalades, chewing gum super loud,” asking for welfare checks. They describe a neighborhood where “70% of the people around me were undocumented” and who “lived the life,” including new cars and weekend parties. They mention an entitlement to “wake” (likely WIC) as well. The speaker contrasts the situation with US citizens, claiming US citizens do not qualify for nothing, and observes a common pattern where undocumented women or moms would not work, while US citizen moms must work to afford living. They state they have nothing against undocumented immigrants personally, acknowledging a human perspective, but indicate that if they were undocumented, they would also take advantage of the loophole. They criticize the government, particularly California, for not implementing regulations to limit fraud and waste. They argue that taxpayers pay for this waste and fraud, and that when the federal government enforces immigration laws, people become upset and confused about deportations after openly living and receiving benefits regardless of immigration status. They call for better practices, saying California and everyone must be on the same page.

I make over $100,000 a month, have a $100,000 chain and a $60,000 watch, and I still use food stamps at Kroger and Walmart. I'm from Dayton, Ohio, and we were fucked up growing up. I pay $200 to my food stamp plug and she gives me $400 in food stamps. I don't care how much money I make; I'm going to use it. I walk in with my chain and watch and swipe my EBT. I tell people to get food stamps and government assistance and run that shit up. I don't care if you can afford it or not, I still need to get my $400 a month from my food stamp plug. I pay half price and double up because I'm a young nigga from a rough background. I still swipe a motherfucking EBT. If you sell EBT stamps, let me know.

The speaker asserts that the core reason many people are upset about food stamp and SNAP benefit programs is not the policy itself but the practice of selling food stamps for cash. They claim that a large number of individuals in New York and other states are buying and selling their food stamps at corner stores and delis, effectively exchanging the benefits for cash. The speaker provides concrete-sounding examples to illustrate the scale of this activity, saying that people are obtaining around $7,000 in food stamps and selling them for cash, or receiving about $4,000 in food stamps and taking roughly $1,000 in cash in exchange. They emphasize that this selling is happening “everywhere,” suggesting it is widespread and not confined to a single area. The speaker also notes that those involved will not admit to selling their food stamps, but insists that it is happening. The overall message is that the dissatisfaction with the SNAP program, in the speaker’s view, stems from the illicit resale of benefits rather than the program’s intent or structure, and that these practices are pervasive across various locations. The speaker foregrounds the belief that the practice is common enough to explain the anger and protests, and they present the assertion as an observed phenomenon rather than a hypothetical concern. The emphasis remains on the alleged pattern of selling SNAP benefits for cash, the amounts involved, and the universality of the practice, coupled with the expectation that the participants would deny it publicly. The speaker’s rhetoric centers on the perception of widespread resale activity and its role in fueling controversy around food stamp benefits.

The speaker expresses outrage at the child protection system's mismanagement, funded by taxpayers. In a case against Los Angeles County, it was revealed that $2.2 billion was spent in 2016 alone. This amount was for one county in one year, highlighting a nationwide issue of excessive spending on a flawed system.

An individual expresses outrage over a receipt allegedly left by a Venezuelan migrant in a New York City bodega. The receipt purportedly shows a food stamp balance of $13,401.82 and a cash balance of $4,498.85 on a taxpayer-funded EBT card. The speaker contrasts this with the struggles of veterans and senior citizens. They claim Kamala Harris has an open checkbook on the taxpayer's dime and spends lavishly. The speaker suggests Harris will provide government subsidies to migrants for housing while citizens struggle. They reference videos from Venezuela showing protests against the recent election and accuse Nicolas Maduro of refusing to leave power. The speaker asks if people want four more years of this and questions why the migrant receives $13,000 a month in food stamps and $5,000 in cash.

Speaker 0: In America, we don't have a tax problem. We've got a third world problem. This is not an exaggeration. The United States collects over $2,400,000,000,000 in income taxes every year and then burns $1,500,000,000,000 through fraud, waste, and third world robbery. If the elites actually did their jobs and cut out the waste, the government would only need about $900,000,000,000 to function. And here's the crazy part. That would mean anyone earning under $500,000 a year could pay zero income tax, and everything would still be fully funded. So if this money isn't funding our future, whose dream is it really building? Look at Minnesota. The Somali daycare scandal gave us the answer. Billions of dollars you worked for, money meant to feed hungry kids, was diverted through fake daycare centers, phantom meals, and paperwork designed to approve. Not question, no kids, no food, just checks. Your hard earned labor was turned into Lamborghinis, beachfront mansions, and luxury vacations most of us will never experience even after a lifetime of honest work. On top of that, your tax dollars were routed to foreign organizations The US Military is fighting. Let that sink in. We went from defending liberty to bankrolling the threat. That's not compassion. That's collapse. And when systems fail like this, they don't admit mistakes. They don't apologize for wasting your money. They dig deeper into your pockets to fund their failure.

The speaker describes spending in Los Angeles on homelessness, stating that last year $13,000,000,000 was used to combat homelessness in the city. They claim that this money went to “these trash nonprofits” where “a bunch of executives” earn “half a $1,000,000 a year.” The speaker asserts, “You’re working for a nonprofit dealing with homelessness. That’s my money. That’s my parents’ money.” They emphasize that hardworking people of California pay incredibly high taxes that fund this through the claimed expenditures. The speaker connects this spending to the broader political perspective by saying they are sick of it and describe their experience on the ground in California as causing them to question a lot about left-wing ideology.

The speaker argues that the real reason many people are upset about food stamps and SNAP benefits is because people are selling their food stamps. They claim this selling is happening widely in New York and other states, with individuals going to corner stores or delis to trade their benefits for cash. The speaker provides specific figures to illustrate the practice: some people are reportedly selling $7,000 worth of food stamps for cash, while others might have $4,000 in food stamps and take around $1,000 in cash in exchange. The speaker emphasizes that this phenomenon is occurring "everywhere." They assert that the public is angry for this reason, and they insist that people will never admit to selling their food stamps, but the selling is happening.

The US Department of Agriculture distributes free meals and food stamps to 46,000,000 people annually. The National Park Service asks visitors not to feed the animals, because the animals will grow accustomed to handouts and never learn to take care of themselves. The speaker believes in a social safety net to help the homeless, disenfranchised, struggling families, the elderly, disabled, veterans, and children. However, the speaker questions why the food stamps program doesn't have the same common sense as the policy for animals in national parks. Continuing to create a welfare state without allowing people to better themselves will perpetuate existing problems.

The speaker expresses outrage after discovering information about people allegedly using government benefits, possibly EBT, for Carnival Cruises. The speaker found blog posts dating back to 02/2012 discussing how to use benefits for cruises. The speaker questions how a single household can receive four benefits and expresses disbelief that EBT can be used at bars. The speaker contrasts this with the struggles of working people to afford travel and is angered that taxpayers are allegedly footing the bill for these cruises.

I was called out for using EBT while driving a 2025 Benz. It's nobody's business what I drive or how I get my benefits. Yes, I receive $271 in food stamps and I’m living my life. I appreciate the support from taxpayers. I embrace my lifestyle, relying on various forms of assistance like food stamps and child support. Everyone has their own way of making a living, and this is mine.

The speaker argues that much of the backlash against SNAP benefits stems from people selling their food stamps. They claim that in New York and other states, individuals go to corner stores or delis to sell their food stamps for cash. The speaker states that some people receive around $7,000 in food stamps and sell them for cash, while others get about $4,000 in food stamps and take roughly $1,000 in cash. They emphasize that this selling is happening “everywhere.” The speaker also notes that people who sell food stamps will never admit to doing so, but asserts that it is happening.

Both Trump and Biden are boasting about their economic records, but the reality is that many Americans are struggling. One example is Keith Amato, a commercial fisherman who has no pension and relies on food stamps to survive. However, the price of food has skyrocketed due to inflation caused by funding wars and printing money. In fact, the price of basic food items like chicken, eggs, and milk has increased by 78%. To make matters worse, 30 million Americans, including Keith, had their food stamps cut to $23 a month. Meanwhile, the government is spending billions on foreign aid and bailing out banks. This economic disparity has led to half of Americans relying on credit cards to make ends meet, resulting in a record-breaking $1.1 trillion in credit card debt. Many families are forced to choose between basic necessities like food, gasoline, and medicine, leaving them in a state of desperation.

The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this. The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this. The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years. The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.

A single mother earning $20 an hour with two children states that after bills, she has no extra money. She was denied food stamps because she makes too much. She believes that people who come to the country legally and do not work receive whatever they want, while she, working 40 hours a week, receives no financial help. She says this is why many Americans are angry, because they feel the situation is unfair.

The transcript presents a speaker arguing that Gavin Newsom’s welfare fraud problems are far worse than those attributed to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, and that the liberal media is not addressing these issues. The speaker states that Newsom “allowed $30,000,000,000 in fraudulent welfare payments to be issued by the unemployment agency,” and that as a result, small businesses in California must pay off all of that debt through higher payroll taxes. The speaker contrasts this with Walz, who is “accused of allowing $250,000,000 of food stamp fraud to occur to Somali organizations.” The speaker asserts that Newsom’s food stamp fraud is at a multi-billion-dollar level and claims Newsom’s food stamp fraud rate is “thirteen point four percent,” describing it as “three out of every 20 benefits managed by Newsom's administration for food stamps completely fraudulent.” Additionally, the speaker contends that California funds “left wing NGOs,” including various Somali community organizations in Minnesota, and asserts that “a lot of those NGOs are using taxpayer money for politics.” The speaker claims that the liberal media is not covering any of these scandals and asserts that people should know these alleged facts because they are not being discussed by the media. In summary, the speaker asserts: - Newsom’s welfare fraud is exponentially worse than Walz’s, with $30 billion in fraudulent unemployment payments allegedly issued by California’s unemployment agency. - As a consequence, small California businesses must bear the cost via higher payroll taxes. - Walz is accused of allowing $250 million of food stamp fraud targeting Somali organizations. - Newsom’s food stamp fraud is claimed to be multi-billion in scope, with a fraud rate of 13.4% (three of every twenty benefits). - California is funding left-wing NGOs, including Somali-related organizations, with taxpayer money used for political purposes. - The liberal media is not covering these alleged scandals, and the speaker asserts these are important facts that should be known.

The speaker believes too many people are "sucking off the government." They work with Section 8 tenants who fall behind on rent but then file taxes and receive a rebate. These tenants also receive SNAP benefits, reduced or free rent, and Social Security benefits, which the speaker claims have been perverted from their original purpose due to politicians buying votes. The speaker alleges that many of these individuals are able-bodied, can work, but choose not to, while the federal government pays for a majority of their living expenses.

I'm seeing a lot of unfairness in South Florida. Long-time residents, some who arrived from Cuba 45 years ago, retire on Social Security payments of $800-$1000 a month after working their entire lives. Yet, new arrivals from Cuba, sometimes just months in the country, receive $1500 monthly in benefits as refugees, even if they're young and able-bodied. I've seen cases where these refugees then make multiple trips back to Cuba. They receive extensive government assistance, including Medicaid, food stamps, and healthcare. It's frustrating to see people who've contributed decades to this country receive less than someone who recently arrived and is seemingly taking advantage of the system. This situation is common and deeply unjust.