reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 2019, I went to Ukraine to learn about far-right extremist groups. The Azov Movement, a far-right group linked to violence, organized a festival that attracted many Ukrainians who saw them as war heroes. Azov has connections to white supremacist ideology and has recruited members from notorious far-right groups. They have their own paramilitary wing and training grounds near the front lines of the war against pro-Russian forces. Azov has also tried to build relationships with far-right groups worldwide, including in the US and Europe. Experts are concerned about their recruitment strategy and the potential for acts of terrorism. White supremacist attacks have increased significantly in Western countries between 2014 and 2019.

C14 leader Ivan Karas aims to break the chains connecting Ukraine to imperial powers like Russia. He clarifies that he is a Ukrainian nationalist, not a Nazi, and highlights the tension between different ethnic groups controlling economic and political power. Despite being labeled as neo-Nazis, C14 won a libel case against a journalist. The Azov battalion, formed as a volunteer militia to counter pro-Russian separatists, played a significant role in keeping Mariupol Ukrainian. However, integration into state structures doesn't diminish their far-right ideology. Led by Andrei Beletsky, the group's insignia, the wolf's angel, is associated with the Nazi paramilitaries. Beletsky has expressed a belief in Ukraine leading the white races in a final crusade.

The leader of the right sector recently threatened to march to Kiev, claiming that the deputy interior minister is a Russian representative who has arrested some of their men. However, this ultimatum was seen as an emotional overreaction by Anton Shekhovtsov. There are politicians who are paid by the Russians to provide information. President Poroshenko knows that he needs to remove the deputy interior minister, not because of the right sector's demands, but because there are suspicions about him. Right-wing candidates received very few votes in the presidential elections. However, experts warn that right-wing nationalist fighters could eventually become independent paramilitaries.

Leftlezer investigates why the Dutch C7NLD assault rifle—a standard weapon of the Dutch military—appears in the hands of the Russian Volunteer Corps (RDK), an extreme-right group fighting on Ukraine’s side, and what the Netherlands’ weapon exports mean for who ultimately uses them. Key findings and claims presented: - The Russian Volunteer Corps is described as an extremist group that fights for Ukraine but is led by a Russian founder, Dennis Capushtin, born in Moscow and later active in Germany. Capushtin is portrayed as having organized extensive neo‑Nazi-leaning activity, including fighting trainings and weapon training; the German Interior Ministry labeled him one of the most influential neo‑Nazi activists in Germany, effectively barring him from entry. - The RDK portrays itself as a political-military organization serving the Russian nation, aiming to dismantle the current political regime in the Russian Federation, with a core of fighters engaging in armed struggle. It claims leadership under the Ukrainian Military Secret Service and asserts involvement beyond defending Ukraine, including sabotage networks in Russia. - Reports describe RDK’s ideology as including esoteric nationalist elements, with public references to Hitler as a spiritual figure. A Tulefest event hosted bands such as Hitlers Hamer, Adolf-cult, and Apartheid, which Bellingcat describes as esoteric nationalism blending neo-Nazism with occult ideas. - The video notes a shift in 2023 where Dennis’s activities reportedly extended to attempting to “invade” Russia, with some weapons (including Scars) appearing with the RDK in Russia. This is used to argue that the stated aim of defending Ukraine had broadened to actions against Russia. - The central concern is whether Dutch-made Cold 7 NLD rifles, exported under Dutch defense ministry rules, ended up with the RDK or other extremist actors. The Netherlands exports large quantities of weapons, including to Ukraine, and Dutch law requires end-user declarations and possible EU/UN oversight. There is a nuance: some RDK activities are described as operating under a Ukrainian authority, which could complicate end-user controls. - The ministers and officials are pressed on why and how the Netherlands allowed a transfer of Cold 7 NLD rifles that might have landed with extremist groups. The Dutch export licensing process is explained: weapons supplied to Ukraine may be used by Ukrainian forces under international law, with end-user terms set forth in end-user declarations; transfers to other parties require Dutch government permission. - The defense ministry responds with a standard position: Netherlands supplies military materiel to Ukraine to assist against Russian aggression, with use governed by international law; the exact distribution among units or sub-units is not disclosed. The ministry refuses to confirm specific end-use details and notes that they cannot reflect on subunits that weapons may reach. - The interview includes attempts to question a former minister (Brekomans) about signing export licenses, and the current stance is that the details are handled by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the defense ministry. The current ministry of foreign affairs provides a response about broad policy and the possibility of rapid EU-wide assessments; the defense ministry declines to confirm the specific distribution of weapons to extremist groups. - The program concludes by asserting significant public interest and calls for further scrutiny of Dutch spending on Ukrainian defense—requesting readers to donate for more critical reporting. Notes on responses: - The program presents a narrative linking Dutch C7NLD rifles to the RDK and to far-right networks, while presenting official positions that emphasize general end-use rules and the broad objective of aiding Ukraine, without providing a definitive public confirmation that the weapons were used by RDK or other extremist groups. The documentary style emphasizes ongoing information requests and the lack of explicit disclosures from relevant ministries.

This transcript argues that Putin’s denazification claim rests on the presence of neo‑Nazi symbols and actors in Ukraine. It states the red and black flag is 'the flag of the Bandera faction of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists' and the blue and yellow shield symbol is that of what was called the Azov Battalion; these symbols are described as 'pro Nazi symbols' such as the Wolfsangel and the Sonnenrad or black sun. It asserts 'The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists were Nazi collaborators during World War II' and that Bandera’s followers committed pogroms and ethnic cleansing. It links the 2014 Maidan revolution to Bandarite influence, naming figures like Yarosz, Beletsky, and Avakov, who allegedly integrated far-right militias into the National Guard. It notes Zelensky’s Jewish background amid claims he aligns with Western interests, criticizes Western media for whitewashing, and points to social media normalization of Azov symbols, urging anti‑war action.

Amidst tributes and flowers, armed men with questionable symbols and far-right graffiti are seen in the square. Ordinary Australians, including students, doctors, workers, and families, played a significant role in bringing down the government. However, a small number of far-right groups were the most organized and effective, often being the loudest and most violent during confrontations with the police. The largest group, called the right sector, can be seen marching in Kiev with baseball bats and sometimes guns. We encountered some members posing for pictures near their burnt-out headquarters and asked about their political beliefs.

The truth about US interference in Ukraine, dating back to WWII when CIA worked with Ukrainian Nazis, led to the rise of extremist groups like Svoboda and Right Sector. Yanukovych's refusal of IMF's offer sparked a US-backed coup orchestrated by the State Department and Joe Biden. The push for war against Russia serves globalist interests, not patriotism.

The Svoboda Party, formerly known as the Social Nationalist Party, has ties to Nazi Germany and its leader, Holitanybok, has openly targeted Jews and ethnic Russians. Despite being condemned as racist and antisemitic, the US government worked with them, thinking they could control the situation. Victoria Nuland from the US State Department met with Svoboda and was caught on a leaked call discussing who they would put in power. They debated whether Klitschko should be in the government and ultimately decided against it. The focus was on manipulating the situation in their favor.

The speaker describes Stepan Bandera and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists as Nazi-aligned white supremacists who murdered Jews, Poles, and Russians. After World War II, the CIA used the Galen organization to coordinate with the Banderists as a stay-behind force to fight the Soviets, resulting in a violent war until the Soviets gained the upper hand around 1953-1954. Many Banderists were imprisoned or fled to the West, where they were welcomed and maintained connectivity through diaspora funding. After being released from the gulag, they infiltrated Ukrainian society. The CIA continued to coordinate the resurrection of Banderist ideology to weaken the Soviet Union, which succeeded in 1991. In 2014, the CIA ousted the Ukrainian president and replaced him with someone the US could support, resulting in the Banderists taking control. The speaker claims the CIA has been supporting Banderist groups since 1945.

Oleg Thjavnibok founded Svoboda, a radical nationalist party known for its anti-Semitic and anti-Russian views. Despite being ranked fifth in the Simon Wiesenthal Center's list of antisemitic world leaders in 2012, Svoboda gained a significant following. The party, previously called the Social Nationalist Party, has historical ties to Nazi Germany. Its leader, Holitanybok, openly targeted Jews and ethnic Russians. The US government's association with Svoboda, as seen in meetings with Victoria Nuland and Senator John McCain, raises questions about why they would support such extremist groups. The EU has condemned Svoboda as racist, anti-Semitic, and xenophobic.

Ukraine faced issues like human trafficking, organ trafficking, narco trafficking, and fascism. These threats are global, not just local. The world is on the brink of World War 3 due to these dangers. We are all at risk of being controlled by lies and manipulation from a common enemy.

The opposition in Ukraine includes extremist groups like Svoboda, which has ties to Nazi Germany. The leader of Svoboda, Holitanybok, has openly targeted Jews and ethnic Russians. Despite being condemned by the EU, the US government backed these extremists, thinking they could control the situation. Victoria Nuland from the US State Department was caught on a leaked call discussing who they would put in power. They didn't think Klitschko should be part of the government.

In this video, the speaker mentions powerful figures in Kiev, including Prime Minister Yatsenyuk, Vitali Klitschko, and Oleh Tyahnybok. Tyahnybok's party, the Freedom Party, has questionable influences. The speaker then discusses Stepan Bandera, a hero of the Freedom Party who collaborated with the Nazis during World War II, fought against the Russians, and was involved in the persecution of Jews. The speaker highlights the hero worship of a fascist on the Maidan, with the three-finger salute as a symbol of Freedom Party supporters. The video also mentions the presence of Freedom Party officials at NPD events in Germany. Finally, the speaker quotes Tyahnybok's call to fight against Russians, Germans, Jews, and other "vermin" for the Ukrainian homeland.

In this video, the speakers discuss the controversial figure Turchinov and his role as Ukraine's acting president in 2014 during the anti-government protests. The discussion touches on the presence of criminals, neo-Nazis, and fascists among the protesters. The focus then shifts to the US's alleged support for the Azov battalion, a far-right militia known for its ties to neo-Nazism within the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The speakers mention Max Blumenthal's article, which exposes this support as a scandalous episode of covert US assistance to neo-Nazis in Ukraine. The Azov battalion originated from the Patriot of Ukraine party, a white nationalist group that promotes racial purity. The battalion became active during the civil war in Eastern Ukraine.

In this video, we see the Ukrainian volunteer group, the Right Sector, who played a violent role in the Maidan protests, reclaiming the city of Mariupol alongside the army. The Right Sector is known to have some members with extremist views. The commander of the group, who has ties to a neo-Nazi organization, is now seen standing next to the Ukrainian Minister of Justice, who praises their bravery. The government is even providing them with armored vehicles. Another commander, Dmitri Yarş, leads a predominantly nationalist group within the Right Sector, and the government plans to legalize their battalion as well. Experts believe that keeping these right-wing groups within the army helps control them, as they must learn discipline.

The video discusses the rise of paramilitary groups in Ukraine following the revolution in 2014. These groups, such as the Right Sector and Azov Brigade, initially played a role in overthrowing the government but later became a threat to the new government. They imposed their own order in the streets and committed acts of violence, including the massacre in Odessa. The video explores the political vision and actions of these paramilitary groups, as well as their connections to far-right ideologies. It also raises questions about the involvement of the United States in supporting the revolution and whether they were aware of the presence of neo-Nazi elements within the Ukrainian revolutionaries.

In this video, the speaker discusses the incorporation of volunteer battalions into the Ukrainian military. They mention that the Azov fighters, who were once a self-established group, are now a part of the Ukrainian military. The speaker also acknowledges that in 2014, some volunteers violated Ukrainian laws and were taken to court, receiving prison sentences. They emphasize the importance of the law being above all.

Maidan Independence Square has become a war zone, with ongoing clashes in Kyiv. The situation is dire, with at least 70 dead and rising, marking a significant revolution. The U.S. has invested over $5 billion to assist Ukraine amid these tensions. NATO has expanded into 13 countries near Russia's borders, raising concerns about escalating conflict. Robert Perry, an investigative journalist, highlights that a segment of the Ukrainian population supports extreme right-wing positions and has formed militias that intensified violence during the Maidan protests. What began as peaceful demonstrations has turned increasingly violent.

The shooter had ties to a white supremacist manifesto and expressed interest in joining a far-right paramilitary group in Ukraine. The Azov Movement, formed during Ukraine's 2014 revolution, is seen as heroes by some Ukrainians but criticized for far-right ideology and controversial symbols. Azov's emblem is linked to Nazism, and the group has recruited from Neo-Nazi organizations.

The events of January 6th were not spontaneous; planning began in September involving deep state members and various NGOs. We have identified those involved, and if you're on that list, you should consider leaving the country, as prosecution is likely. We have video evidence of meetings, including one with an infiltrator who recorded them. The planning included participation from groups like the Azov battalion in Ukraine, which is linked to Nazi ideologies. This group is not just labeled as Neo-Nazis; they represent a continuation of Hitler's legacy, marking a troubling resurgence of extremist ideologies.

The National Militia, associated with the far-right group ASOV, has caused chaos in Ukraine by trashing places, fighting police, and holding officials hostage. ASOV's founder, Andrei Biletsky, has a history of racist and anti-semitic views. They have infiltrated Ukrainian politics, with ties to Interior Minister Arsen Abakov who employs their fighters and has appointed one of their commanders as his deputy.

The shooter is connected to a 74-page manifesto with white supremacist beliefs. He expressed interest in joining a far-right paramilitary group in Ukraine. Some members of an American hate group also trained with the Azov Battalion, a group that emerged during Ukraine's 2014 revolution and gained strength during the ongoing war with pro-Russian forces. Azov is seen by many Ukrainians as war heroes rather than extremists, but their symbols, including one resembling a Nazi emblem, have sparked controversy. Azov drew commanders and recruits from Ukraine's notorious far-right groups, including neo-Nazis, when it was founded in 2014.

The Azov battalion, a militia in Ukraine, is said to be affiliated with Nazi ideology. Some argue that the presence of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is not a concern, as mainstream outlets in the US have previously reported on it. However, there are forces within Ukraine that do not view the Russian-speaking population as equals, with Azov being a major representation of this. The Azov soldier openly displayed Nazi symbols and even gave talks to middle school students in the US. While they may use different imagery, they are still associated with neo-Nazism. Despite previous bans on US assistance, recent history seems to have been forgotten since the February invasion.

Nazist battalions in Ukraine do exist, despite claims to the contrary. The speaker mentions the Praviy Sektor party, known for its neo-Nazi affiliations, and their leader Yuris Oro Duke. The journalist Andrea Rocchelli was killed by Ukrainian forces during the civil war, and investigations into his death were hindered by Ukrainian authorities. Despite this, a vice commander of the Ukrainian National Guard was arrested and expelled from the courtroom for tampering with witness testimonies. The speaker also mentions a documentary on the topic by Cristiano Tinazzi. In the end, the appeal of the convicted individual resulted in acquittal.

Zelensky is a fascist or communist in Eastern Europe, evidenced by the actions of his secret police and state. We see it in his treatment of churches, and the prevalence of organized crime in Ukraine. The human trafficking and disappearance of tens of thousands of women and children into exploitative underworlds is shameless.