reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A Winnipeg cafe owner and her family were believed to have been attacked, with the café trashed and anti-Semitic graffiti, sparking community shock and an outpouring of support. Police, however, say the incident was staged and have charged Oksana Behrendt, Maxim Behrendt, and Alexander Behrendt with public mischief. The family maintains their story, insisting they were victims of hate, and speaking on CBC Radio after the charges were filed. They described themselves as targets and said they did not stage anything, with statements like “In this moment, somebody grabbed me” and “They can find any evidence against anybody.” They also expressed that their business and home were under threat and emphasized their belief that the attack was real. Police maintained that the incident in Winnipeg was staged and that there was evidence of a crime, though not a hate crime. The cafe’s interior still bore signs of investigation as officers worked the scene. The backlash was swift: a Jewish LGBTQ advocacy group moved out of the building, and there was broad concern that the alleged stunt could undermine support for legitimate hate crimes. Community leaders and residents described feelings of betrayal and worry about future incidents, with comments such as “This is a betrayal of the community and a betrayal of also the police” and concerns that people might doubt genuine cases in the future. Court records show the Behrendts faced lawsuits over debts, and the family denied staging the incident for financial gain. They insisted they did not deserve judgment based on what they say is their truth, stating, “I don’t want people to judge us wrongly because we didn’t do it.” The charges were upheld by the court, and the broader community expressed disappointment and anger about the situation. Meanwhile, excerpts noted that hate-crime cases in Canada had risen to an all-time high in 2017, with nearly 2,100 incidents—a 47% increase from the previous year. Attacks on Jewish people accounted for 18% of all hate crimes, with attacks on Muslims a close second. Other items mentioned included international incidents: in Israel, police announced the arrest of an 18-year-old American-Israeli behind a series of bomb threats targeting Jewish communities worldwide; authorities said he used the Internet to mask his location, and the suspect faced a medical examination and legal scrutiny. In North York, a 67-year-old man, Avram Babrovsky, faced arson charges for allegedly setting a fire inside a synagogue, with a history of using his own access card to gain entry. In Schenectady, a man was accused of spray-painting swastikas on his own home, later charged with falsely reporting an incident and harassment. In West Bloomfield, Michigan, police credited technology for solving a case in which Sean Sammett allegedly fabricated an attack on leaving a synagogue; investigators found inconsistencies in his account, including elevated heart rate on an Apple Watch prior to the claimed assault, and evidence suggested he stabbed himself with a knife and used bloody tissues. Sammett was charged with filing a false police report, with authorities noting the impact on real victims and the community’s sense of safety. In Brooklyn and Manhattan, authorities reported 56-year-old David Haddad, who is Jewish, as the suspect in a string of antisemitic messages and swastika incidents, with additional phone threats to kill Jews. In Vancouver, a defamation suit was filed against HillelBC by UBC’s Social Justice Center over “iHeartHammas” stickers on campus; the stickers had circulated during a walkout for Palestine and a contractor who helped distribute them had been terminated. UBC stated it would not comment on the suit, and RCMP said no charges were laid after investigation. Additionally, Amsterdam’s mayor walked back the use of the term pogrom after violence following a match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv, amid political fallout from comments by a government official blaming Moroccans for the unrest. A separate report discussed viral video miscaptioning of footage from Amsterdam, showing Maccabi Tel Aviv fans fighting in a way that media outlets had miscaptioned as Jews being attacked; fact-checkers confirmed the video actually showed Maccabi fans chasing a Dutch man, and several outlets issued corrections.

The report centers on a series of antisemitism-related incidents and contested claims across North America and Europe, highlighting how initial reactions to alleged acts of antisemitic violence were later questioned or contradicted. In Winnipeg, Manitoba, the CBC reports that Oksana Behrendt (also spelled Barrent) and her son Maxim, along with her husband Alexander, initially described an attack on Behrendt’s cafe, a break-in, robbery, and antisemitic graffiti. They later faced public mischief charges after police said the incident was staged. Behrendt and her family deny staging it, insisting they were victims of hate. Police say the evidence shows a crime occurred, but not a hate crime. The community reacted with shock and support before the charges, with some Jewish community leaders calling the alleged deception damaging to the broader community and police credibility. The cafe remained under investigation, with the couple maintaining their story as the court process proceeds. A planned interfaith vigil at the cafe was canceled, and a crowdfunding drive to assist the family was taken down amid confusion and anger. Court records show the family also faces lawsuits over debts, which they deny relate to staging the incident. Nationally, the broadcast notes that hate crime reports in Canada reached an all-time high in 2017, with nearly 2,100 incidents—a 47% increase from the prior year. Attacks on Jewish people comprised about 18% of these hate crimes, with attacks on Muslims close behind. In Israel and North America, authorities described a string of bomb threats targeting Jewish communities worldwide, including in the United States and Canada. An eighteen-year-old American-Israeli was identified as a primary suspect behind threats to multiple Jewish centers, schools, and synagogues, including bomb threats that led to evacuations. Israeli police reported that the suspect used online technology to mask his location, and that he had not served in the army due to medical issues; a medical examination was ordered. The suspect was also linked to a 2015 Delta Airlines threat case. The broader implication noted was the ongoing concern over threats to Jewish institutions globally. In North America, other cases included a synagogue arson in North York, and a man in Schenectady who spray-painted his own home with swastikas and was charged with falsely reporting an incident. In West Bloomfield, Michigan, a stabbing reported at a local temple was later determined to be fabricated by Sean Samit; investigators cited the Apple Watch data showing normal heart rates around the time of the alleged attack, and bloody tissues and a knife found at the scene. Samit faced charges for filing a false police report, with officials emphasizing the potential harm to real victims. The transcript also covers campus and local incidents: at George Washington University, swastikas appeared on a student’s door, but hidden-camera footage confirmed the student herself to be the apparent perpetrator; she will face student discipline and possibly criminal charges. In Vancouver, a defamation lawsuit was filed by UBC’s Social Justice Centre against HillelBC over iHeartHammas stickers distributed on campus, which the SJC says were defamatory. UBC stated that the investigation and RCMP involvement had concluded with no charges. Lastly, in Amsterdam, the mayor backtracked on using the word pogrom to describe violence after Ajax vs. Maccabi Tel Aviv football related clashes and ensuing political fallout. The discussion included miscaptioned footage of clashes in Amsterdam, where social media claims that Muslims were hunting Jews circulated, but fact-checkers confirmed the video actually depicted Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters engaging in a fight in front of Amsterdam Central Station. Major outlets were criticized for miscaptioning the footage, and some issued corrections or removals.

There is a bomb on a plane. Lufthansa flight four four one. "I provided the bomb, and my team smuggled the bomb." "C four bomb." "We are told that this is called a, quote, viable threat, and canine units will sweep the plane, and all luggage and cargo will be checked." The pilot diverted the plane to JFK. "Two bomb threats called into two Jewish centers." "There was a bomb in the JCC that's going to go up to me in less than an hour." "Inside the JCC Building." "Tell them to hit the blue button because this is not okay." Katie with the FBI. "You've been in The United States. Do you speak English?" "You speak English very well." "We know what happened, we know how it happened, we know who did it, but we don't know why." "I didn't do it." "We have everything that we need in this case." "The anti Semitic threats targeting our Jewish community are horrible." "We are representatives of the United States government or the FBI."

I support Palestine and I don't consider my actions a crime. I vandalized a Starbucks and didn't hide my face because I believe I'm fighting for justice and peace. The next morning, the police were called on me by a Jewish boy and his girlfriend who questioned my actions. I didn't know what would happen, but now, almost 24 hours later, I find myself doxxed online. I'm not sure what that means, but I'll have to look it up soon.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them. This follows the speaker's video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker anticipates the FBI's involvement, recalling a previous incident in November when someone smeared them by sending false bomb threats to synagogues in their city, attributed to the speaker. The speaker expresses disdain for the FBI, federal authorities, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them because they published a video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker anticipates the FBI's involvement, recalling a previous incident in November when they say a Zionist smeared them by sending false bomb threats to synagogues in their city in the speaker's name. The speaker expresses anger towards the FBI, the feds, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them because they published a video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker says this isn't the first time the FBI has come to their door; it also happened in November when a Zionist smeared them by sending synagogues in their city false bomb threats in the speaker's name. The speaker expresses anger towards the FBI, the feds, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

A narrative of alleged Israeli false flag operations is laid out, beginning with 1949 when Meyer Max Bennett, described as a Zionist Jew of German descent, was sent to Iraq by Mossad. There he connected with Mossad agent Youssef Basri and planned a series of attacks on Iraqi Jews, providing maps, instructions, and specific orders to terrorize the Jewish population. From 1950 to 1951 a wave of bombings struck the Jewish community in Iraq, targeting cafes, mechanic shops, and synagogues with grenades and TNT. These attacks coincided with underground Zionist groups urging Iraqi Jews to leave for Israel, resulting in the exodus of about 130,000 Iraqi Jews within two years and aiding Israel’s early demographic needs. The account states these Iraqi attacks are part of a long list of Israel’s false flag operations. Basri was arrested by Iraqi police and executed for involvement. Bennett escaped and later helped organize an even larger false flag operation in Egypt, known as Operation Susanna, beginning in 1952 after Bennett returned under the pretense of a German businessman producing equipment for the disabled. The operation planned Jews to plant bombs inside Egyptian, American, and British civilian targets to blame the Muslim Brotherhood and Egyptian Communists, with the aim of influencing the British to retain troops along the Suez Canal. Bombings occurred in Alexandria and Cairo, but the scheme failed when one agent betrayed the plot and Egyptian authorities arrested undercover Jewish operatives, including Bennett. Bennett committed suicide when facing execution. The operation became known as the Lavon affair. Israel denied involvement at the time, but exposure followed later in 2005 when the Israeli president awarded surviving Lavon-affair agents certificates, and again in 2023 when British-Israeli historian Abi Shlaim spoke to a Jewish agent involved in Baghdad, who provided evidence of Israeli culpability. The text asserts numerous reports of false flag operations across decades serving Israel’s interests, including alleged involvement or influence in terrorist acts, and uses these cases to justify speculative claims about more recent or modern attacks being Israeli false flags. It references a connection to nine-eleven, and notes an incident on 10/10/2001 when two Israelis with Pakistani passports, grenades, explosives, and guns were stopped in the Mexican parliament while intending to blame Muslims; Mexican authorities purportedly faced pressure from Israel to suppress reporting. The narrative continues with a 2025 explosion destroying three buses in Bat Yam and Occupied Palestine, with Israeli authorities claiming Palestinian terrorists while asserting it was actually two Jewish Israelis; a media blackout followed. It mentions thousands of bomb threats during Trump’s presidency purportedly made by a Jewish American Israeli, initially used as evidence of rising antisemitism but later alleged to be perpetrated by the same group. It cites a Jewish American Israeli teen accused of making 2,000 threats and attempting to extort a Republican senator, with some calls directed to Australian Jewish centers. In Australia, cases are described as false flag attempts: a Zionist wearing a Star of David cap in a Muslim-owned cafe as part of a staged sting by The Daily Telegraph; two crackheads recruited to spray “kill the Jews” on a car and perform arson against synagogues and restaurants, later revealed to involve dark web recruitment and cryptocurrency payments. Australia is said to have been pressured to blame Iran, though no evidence is provided. The text also references Bondi Beach attacks and online speculation of false flags, arguing that Zionists’ long history of orchestration undermines public trust. A closing note echoes a maxim about deception, followed by a call for viewers to engage critically in the comments and to consider becoming a channel member to support continued production.

Harvard University and MIT are now being criticized for tolerating and possibly encouraging antisemitism. There is little outcry in America about this issue, with conservative media being the only ones discussing it. The media's focus on a fake news story about a noose in Bubba Wallace's garage overshadowed the seriousness of the antisemitic attacks. The speaker emphasizes the need for more attention and sensitivity towards the attacks on Jewish people.

Earlier this year, there was Nazi imagery in our nation's capital, which was disturbing for the Jewish community and Canadians. Antisemitism is increasing online and in person, and must be addressed.

The speaker discusses being accused of horrible things due to being Jewish and receiving messages questioning their trustworthiness as a dual Canadian-Israeli citizen. Another speaker asks if they work for an Israeli intelligence firm called Black Cube, to which the speaker denies. The conversation shifts to a specific point that the speaker didn't fully answer before abruptly ending.

The speaker discusses being accused of horrible things due to being Jewish and receiving messages questioning their trustworthiness as a dual Canadian-Israeli citizen. Another speaker asks if they work for an Israeli intelligence firm called Black Cube, to which the speaker denies. The conversation shifts to a specific point that the speaker didn't fully answer before abruptly ending.

A person is accused of writing a swastika on a Tesla. The Tesla owner says it's a "heat crime" and that the act was caught on video. The car is currently with the police being fingerprinted, and Facebook helped track down the accused. The Tesla owner suggests the accused apologize to Facebook for writing the swastika. The accused apologizes, stating they have nothing against the car or the owner, but admits to having something against Elon Musk. They claim they did not intend to do this.

This is unbelievable. I'm not leaving; this is what Jews in New York City face in a place of business. Is she with you? No. I asked him if he did. Someone needs to call the cops. This is intense. I’m sorry, but we need to involve the authorities. This will be reported to the FBI.

Stop. Move. Who said it's police? They didn't wear yellow jackets, just black, and came with big guns to arrest us. I was scared and didn’t want to run. It took them a while to realize we were Jewish and hadn’t done anything wrong. I was studying when I heard a loud bang, then another, and glass shattered nearby. I jumped up and ran. When I returned, I smelled smoke and thought they were burning the place down. I tried to go inside to get my phone but burned my hands. Another person saw them enter with jerry cans, and when he yelled, they ran away. We believe they intended to cause harm.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them because they published a video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker says this isn't the first time the FBI has come to their door; it also happened in November when a Zionist smeared them by sending synagogues in their city false bomb threats in the speaker's name. The speaker expresses anger towards the FBI, the feds, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

The speaker was asked if they believed students protesting were motivated by anti-Semitism or horror at the Gaza slaughter. The speaker dismissed the idea of students being driven by horror and refused to continue the conversation if it was being recorded.

A journalist asks if there’s someone who can be spoken to about hearing, and is directed to the other side of the park. The exchange turns into a broader set of allegations about a man named Naftali Aaron Kranz and the organization Get Free. The speaker claims Naftali Kranz is a paid protester through Get Free. They present LinkedIn posts recruiting for paid protesters for the company, described as Get Free’s “part time mobilization support contractor.” The speaker asserts Get Free bills itself as a grassroots organization while Naftali and others are allegedly paid to protest. They claim Get Free aims to “undo white supremacy” and that one of the best ways to do that, in Naftali’s view, is to celebrate vandalism, citing Crown Heights, where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. The speaker contends Naftali attended an abolish the police rally but was not the leader, instead blending in among other recruits, and that he works with the DSA, explaining why the speaker met him at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. On LinkedIn, the speaker says Naftali frequently posts about paid protester roles, urging people to join to “help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country,” with recruitment across Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. They describe a nine-week contract, part-time, paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation who will recruit people and train them to drive turnout at events. The speaker also says Naftali is part of Jews Against Trump and urges donations to bail funds to “bail immigrants out of concentration camps,” adding a claim that a Jewish person who calls an immigration detention center a concentration camp has a serious mental illness, and criticizing colleges like NYU, the Democrat party, and mainstream media as brainwashing. The speaker asserts Nicole Cardi is at the top of the Get Free Movement and claims she says the George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the 2020 election. They argue that protest NGO groups are about getting Democrats elected, and that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the speaker says is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. The speaker alleges ActBlue has funneled billions to activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which is said to be orchestrating resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible is claimed to have paid protesters and received over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros.

A Winnipeg cafe owned by a Jewish family was reportedly vandalized with anti-Semitic graffiti, and the owner was allegedly attacked. The incident led to community support, but police now claim the owners staged the event and have charged them with public mischief. The family denies the allegations, maintaining they were victims of a hate crime. Police say they found evidence of a crime, but not a hate crime, expressing disappointment that the family used hate and racism in a disingenuous way. Members of Winnipeg's Jewish community initially considered it a brazen anti-Semitic attack. Now, they worry that if the allegations are true, it damages the community, wastes police time, and may cause skepticism towards future incidents. The cafe and the owner's home were up for sale. An interfaith vigil was canceled, and a crowdfunding campaign was taken down.

From the outset, one of the speakers says there was a sense that the official narrative about the day didn’t add up, expressing that many Americans feel they were being lied to. The major problem they identify with the assassination narrative includes inconsistencies and unanswered questions rather than acceptance of the official story. Speaker 1 recalls being told Charlie Kirk was shot and initially in critical condition, but notes that the video shows an exit wound and movement of Kirk’s shirt that suggests an impact nearby. With extensive experience around gunshot wounds, they say what they saw didn’t make sense. They reference the FBI’s announcement of a shooter and describe a separate incident involving a person on the roof who allegedly disassembled and reassembled a firearm, aligned a scope, fired a cold bore shot, moved to the roof, and then wrapped the rifle up. They mention texts from the shooter that didn’t sound like a typical 22-year-old and state that these observations raise questions. They say asking questions leads to being torn down or accused of holding conspiracy views, and they specify they aren’t claiming “Israel did it,” but insisting the questions about the event “don’t look good.” They raise specific questions: did the security team remove Charlie Kirk’s lapel mic after the incident and give it to someone else; what happened to the SIM card; did someone take the camera behind him; why was the crime scene contaminated and rebuilt. They admit they don’t know what is true but insist the questions deserve answers. They note that once they question, they’re labeled antisemitic, and they say they didn’t even bring up Israel. They emphasize the personal and national significance of the incident. Speaker 0 mentions a claim that Charlie Kirk was portrayed as Superman, with his body supposedly stopping the 30-odd-six bullet, and asks what would have happened if a 30-06 round hit him. Speaker 1 says it would likely blow his head off and leave remnants of the bullet, arguing that they don’t think such remnants have been found yet. They question why the chair and desk were moved and contend that a forensic expert could determine the shot’s origin, insisting they are simply asking questions. If those questions can be refuted, they would stop asking; but they claim they’re not getting any answers beyond “this is what happened” and being told to “shut up.” Speaker 0 adds that telling someone to be quiet amounts to labeling them antisemitic, and that when the trial comes, they will look like a fool. Speaker 1 says that’s a tactic of the left—when you call them out, they label you a name—and that the right is now doing the same to them.

A Winnipeg cafe story dominates for a stretch, with Oksana Behrendt, her husband Alexander, and son Maxim reporting a violent attack on their Jewish-owned cafe, claiming they were assaulted, the cafe robbed and vandalized with anti-Semitic graffiti. Police later say the incident was staged and charge the family with public mischief. The family denies staging the event, insisting they were victims of hate. Community response swings from shock and sympathy to disbelief and anger, with some calling it a betrayal of the community and police. Court records show the family also faces lawsuits over debts. The case has led to cancellations of an interfaith vigil and the removal of a crowdfunding campaign, while police continue to present evidence to be revealed in court. Experts note hate-crime reports in Canada rose to nearly 2,100 incidents in 2017, up 47% from the prior year, with Jewish and Muslim communities among the top targets; the Winnipeg incident is cast as potentially damaging to genuine hate-crime victims if proven to be staged. In Israel and North America, authorities report a separate wave of antisemitic threats and attacks. Police in Israel say an eighteen-year-old American-Israeli is behind a string of bomb threats that terrorized Jewish communities globally, including numerous threats against Jewish centers, day schools, and synagogues, mainly in the United States, with some Canadian institutions evacuating. The suspect was identified through international security cooperation, and police seized computer equipment; the teen reportedly faced a medical condition. There is mention of a prior 2015 threat against Delta Airlines, and the suspect’s medical status is noted by a lawyer and officials. In Toronto area news, a 67-year-old man, Avram Babrovsky, is charged with arson in connection with a fire at a North York synagogue, allegedly after gaining access with his own card. Police continue the investigation and seek information from the public. In New York, a man in Schenectady, Andrew King, is charged with falsely reporting an incident after spray-painting swastikas on his own home and later harassing others; police say he claimed to be targeted due to wearing a yarmulke. In West Bloomfield, Michigan, a different case involves Sean Samet, accused of fabricating a stabbing at a synagogue. Investigators say Samet’s Apple Watch data showed a normal heartbeat during the alleged attack, contradicting his account; bloody tissues and a knife found later indicated self-inflicted harm. He faces charges for filing a false police report. Community leaders emphasize not tolerating exploitation of antisemitism, while acknowledging the impact on real victims seeking justice. In Brooklyn, New York, investigators report 56-year-old David Haddad, Jewish by background, arrested for harassment as a hate crime after a string of antisemitic messages and swastika incidents across Brooklyn and Manhattan, with connections to a local community member and potential ties to other incidents. In Vancouver, British Columbia, a defamation suit is filed by UBC Social Justice Center against HillelBC over iHeartHamas stickers associated with a campus Palestine walkout; HillelBC says an independent contractor distributed the stickers and that the organization terminated its relationship. The SJC asserts the stickers’ content was untrue and harmful, while UBC says it provided information to law enforcement and campus security. The RCMP concluded the investigation with no charges. Across Europe, Amsterdam’s mayor retracts the use of the term pogrom after violence surrounding a football match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv, with political fallout including the resignation of a Dutch finance minister amid right-wing rhetoric that linked Moroccan-origin residents to the violence. A separate segment fact-checks a viral video claiming Muslims are hunting Jews in Amsterdam, establishing that the footage actually shows Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters fighting a Dutch man, not a Muslim mob; miscaptioned coverage by multiple outlets is noted, with corrections and apologies pursued where possible. The piece closes by highlighting the broader context of antisemitic acts and the importance of accurate reporting.

A Winnipeg cafe owner and her family were initially described as victims of a hate-driven attack after the cafe was trashed, robbed, and covered with anti-Semitic graffiti, and the owners alleged they were assaulted. Police later said the incident was staged and charged Oksana Behrendt, Maxim Behrendt, and Alexander Behrendt with public mischief. The family maintains their story, insisting they were attacked and targeted, while the community expresses shock and concern about the implications for real hate crimes. The cafe is still up for sale, and planned interfaith events and crowdfunding for the family were canceled or removed amid backlash and confusion. Police say evidence pointed to a crime, but not a hate crime, and court records show lawsuits against the family for debts; the family denies staging the incident for financial gain. Community responses included fear of undermining genuine anti-Semitic incidents and anger at what some call a betrayal of the community and police. In Canada, hate-crime data for 2017 showed police-recorded hate incidents reaching an all-time high, with nearly 2,100 incidents (up 47% from the previous year). Attacks against Jewish people accounted for about 18% of hate crimes, with Muslim-targeted incidents close behind. International updates included a suspect in bomb threats against Jewish communities worldwide: an 18-year-old American-Israeli was identified by Israeli police as the main suspect, with threats spanning New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. Authorities noted the suspect used Internet-based calling to mask location, and a medical condition was mentioned by the suspect’s lawyer; the suspect was to undergo a medical exam. Separate reporting indicated Israeli police suspected the teen also behind a 2015 threat that led Delta Airlines to divert a flight, and searches included seizures of computer equipment. In North York, a 67-year-old man, Avram Babrovsky, was arrested on arson charges after allegedly setting fire to a synagogue, with investigations ongoing and police seeking more information from the public. In Schenectady, New York, a homeowner, Andrew King, was charged with falsely reporting an incident after painting swastikas on his own home, claiming it was targeted due to his yarmulke. West Bloomfield, Michigan, reported a case where a man, Terren Samit, allegedly fabricated a stabbing at a synagogue. Police credited technology, including Apple Watch data, with helping expose the hoax; Samit faced charges for filing a false police report. Community leaders emphasized not tolerating antisemitism or exploiting police resources, while acknowledging concerns about any impact on genuine victims. In Brooklyn and Manhattan, 56-year-old David Haddad—who is Jewish—was arrested for harassment as a hate crime after distributing antisemitic messages in Brooklyn and Manhattan, and being implicated in related swastika incidents and threats. At George Washington University, a student was found to have painted swastikas on her door herself. The university used hidden cameras and interviews, concluding the student was the apparent victim-dresser, leading to student judicial action and potential criminal charges, with a noted aim of providing help rather than punishment. On Vancouver campuses, a defamation suit was filed by UBC Social Justice Centre against HillelBC over iHeartHammas stickers distributed during a Palestine walkout. HillelBC stated it had terminated its contract with the distributor; UBC and the SJC described harm and a broader concern for safe spaces on campus. The RCMP concluded the Vancouver incident with no charges. In Amsterdam, the mayor walked back her use of the word pogrom after backlash over its political usage, as broader tensions rose with Mor occan-born finance minister resignation following controversial remarks by a right-wing leader. Separately, a viral claim circulated claiming Muslims hunted Jews in Amsterdam; fact-checkers confirmed the video actually showed Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters attacking a Dutch man, not a Jews-hunting mob. Miscaptioned footage prompted corrections from outlets including CNN, BBC, The Guardian, and The New York Times, with the photographer clarifying the true context.

The report centers on the Bermax Cafe vandalism case in Winnipeg, once described as one of the city’s worst acts of anti-Semitism, which later appeared to be a hoax. Oksana Behrendt, Alexander Behrendt, and their son Maxim, the owners, were charged with public mischief after the graffiti incident. In January, they moved to Los Angeles. Bernie Bellen, who knew the Barrents and surveyed the damage, says he has not been in touch with them for over a year and a half. He recalls his initial thought that they would flee, noting they had discussed opening a restaurant in Los Angeles for some time, but he never believed they had the means to do so. Their trial was scheduled for next week. The family filed a motion to appear by video, which was denied. When it became clear they would not attend, a provincial court judge issued an endorsed warrant for all three, meaning that if they return, they would turn themselves in and be out on bail until the trial. One of their lawyers stated they could not afford to come back at that time. The trouble, as explained, is that the COVID-19 pandemic required anyone attending from California to quarantine for at least two weeks before the trial. They would also need somewhere to stay and could not afford hotel quarantines. As a result, they had no choice but to leave. In addition, the negative publicity and financial difficulties had already cost them their business and their home, with no community support remaining in Winnipeg. Michael Lazar notes that the family intends to return when the pandemic is under control. He emphasizes that this is not a case of simply absconding from the court system; if that were the case, there would likely be no communication, and a warrant would have been issued and left unresolved. Instead, they have remained engaged in the process. The Burrents continue to deny staging the crime and maintain their innocence. The situation has stirred reflections within the Jewish community, with ongoing questions and memories provoked by the affair. Erin Bromin of CBC News, Winnipeg, reports.

An individual is accused of writing a swastika on a Tesla using a key. The Tesla owner states that the act is a hate crime and that the key is being fingerprinted by the police to track down the individual. They also mention that Facebook tracked the individual down. The Tesla owner suggests the individual apologize to Facebook for writing the swastika. The individual apologizes, stating they have nothing against the car or the owner, but may have something against Elon Musk. The Tesla owner clarifies they own the car and it was bought and paid for. The individual admits their actions were misguided and unintentional.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them. This follows the speaker's video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker anticipates the FBI's involvement, referencing a prior incident in November when someone smeared them by sending false bomb threats to synagogues in their city, attributed to the speaker. The speaker expresses disdain for the FBI, federal authorities, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.