reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that Germany, despite its educated populace, turned on the Jews due to their "voracious ethnocentrism," power grabbing, influence peddling, buying of politicians, and domination of public media, mirroring their actions in the United States. The speaker predicts that the United States will experience "Weimar conditions" and subsequent solutions. Referencing the rapid collapse of East Germany and the Soviet Union, the speaker suggests the U.S. is heading in a similar direction. The speaker believes the key difference is the prevalence of guns, lawlessness, and a revolutionary spirit in the U.S., arming the population and fostering a spirit of revolution.

Speaker 0 expresses a view that the government is full of liars, accusing both sides of the political spectrum of dishonesty. The conversation then shifts to a provocative claim: "They insisted Hitler was bad and he was not. You don't think Hitler was bad? No. Not at all. There was no holocaust." This remark represents a stark reversal of widely accepted historical consensus, asserting that there was no Holocaust. The speaker describes a surprising personal justification for this belief, saying, "I've I've seen evidence. I my aunt Georgie was in a prison camp and she told me about it and there was no torture, there was no killing." The claim places emphasis on the anecdote of the speaker’s aunt, Georgie, who allegedly was "in a prison camp" and told the speaker about it, specifically asserting that "there was no torture" and "there was no murder." The speaker then elaborates that the aunt was "a Jew in in Germany," which adds a personal and ethnic dimension to the claim, suggesting that a Jewish person in Germany would have firsthand experience of the camp. In continuing, the speaker reiterates the assertion: "There was no torture. There was no murder." The description of the alleged camp life offered by the aunt includes contrasting details such as "films," "an orchestra," "movies," and "a soccer team," painting a picture of a benign environment within the context of a Nazi-prison setting. A further provocative assertion is included: "A Jew started the SS." This statement is presented as part of the aunt’s account or the speaker’s interpretation of the camp’s history, introducing a controversial claim about the origins of the Schutzstaffel. Overall, the speaker challenges the widely accepted historical record by claiming that Hitler was not bad, that there was no Holocaust, and that the aunt’s testimony describes a benign camp life with cultural and recreational elements, culminating in the assertion that a Jew started the SS. The dialogue thus presents a sequence of controversial statements grounded in the speaker’s belief based on an account from their aunt Georgie.

The decline of our culture includes contamination, decomposition of literature, and the poisoning of theaters. Millions of Germans are no longer participating because this art was not born from our people. It is foreign and has nothing to do with the German character. It was imposed by a subversive press. There is an assault against the education of our children's brains, tearing out memories of our German past and insulting the great men of our people. This removes its memory from the hearts and brains of German youth.

The speaker questions why the educated Germans turned on the Jews despite their achievements. They suggest that similar behaviors seen in Germany could lead to similar outcomes in the United States, predicting Weimar-like conditions and solutions.

Pictorial evidence is presented of the nearly unprecedented crimes perpetrated by the Nazis at the Buchenwald Concentration Camp. The narrative claims that the written account is contained in the official report of the Prisoner of War and Displaced Persons division of the United States Group Control Council, which has been forwarded from Supreme Allied Headquarters to the War Department in Washington. The report describes that 1,200 civilians walked from the neighboring city of Weimar to begin a forced tour of the camp. Observers note that many of the civilians arrived with smiles, and at first, the Germans are observed acting as though the visit were staged for their benefit. Among the first experiences for the Weimar civilians upon entering the interior of the camp is the parchment display. A lampshade made of human skin, created at the request of an SS officer's wife, is placed on a table for all to view. Large pieces of skin have been used for painting pictures, including many of an obscene nature. Also displayed are two heads which have been shrunk to one fifth of their normal size. These and other exhibits of Nazi origin are shown to the townspeople. The camera records the changes in facial expressions as the Weimar citizens view and then depart from the parchment display.

The speaker describes an unashamedly derogatory press toward Germans, noting it was obviously intentional. A turning point comes when the speaker realizes that a series of events in the speaker’s country are inspired by a code of ethics and morals openly practiced by the majority of Jews. The speaker learns “what evil really is” and observes what is described as the Jews’ relationship to prostitution and, more severely, to human trafficking, stating that this exploitation could be observed whether one wished it or not. A cold shiver runs down the speaker’s spine upon the realization that it is the “evil, shameless, and calculating Jews” who are skillfully directing such exploitation. This leads to a shift from hesitation to directly bringing up “the Jewish question” with fellow countrymen. The speaker claims to have learned to identify the Jew in many different spheres of cultural life, and with this, asserts a deeper understanding of “who the evil seducers of our people were.” The speaker asserts a stark consequence: if the Jew were to triumph over the peoples of this world, then “his crown will be the funeral wreath of mankind.” The speaker warns that the planet would once again follow its orbit through space, devoid of humanity, as it did millions of years ago. In closing, the speaker states a firm belief that they are acting in accordance with this understanding.

The speaker claims that Germany, despite its high education levels and numerous Nobel Prize winners, turned on the Jews due to the Jews displaying racist ethnocentrism, power grabbing, influence peddling, buying of politicians, and dominating public media. The speaker asserts that the percentage of Jews in Germany was higher than the percentage in the United States today. The speaker predicts that the United States will experience "Weimar conditions" and that the solutions to these conditions will mirror those that occurred in Germany.

The speaker asserts that Germany is undergoing a destructive process orchestrated by international forces, particularly Jews, who gained political power 120 years ago. He claims Jewish people form a state within a state and control the economy through the stock exchange, which is alien to other peoples. Western Europe, unlike Central and Eastern Europe, was less aware of this threat due to fewer Jews who assimilated and manipulated the masses through press propaganda. In Germany, a large Jewish population and aversion from the masses made political contamination more difficult, especially with the monarchy. The speaker claims Jews took control of the working class by founding social democratic and communist movements, inciting greed and ruthlessness. They corrupted the upper classes through intermarriage and manipulated the press to divide the population. Russia is presented as a ruined culture exploited by foreign capital. The speaker criticizes the lack of criticism towards these conditions and calls for resistance. He defines a true socialist as a nationalist who prioritizes the welfare of the German people. He urges young people to join storm divisions to protect Germany and fight against Jewish influence, believing this fight is inevitable for Germany's future.

The speaker claims that no one has analyzed why Germany, despite being well-educated and having many Nobel Prize winners, turned on the Jews. The speaker asserts that the reason is because Jews in Germany displayed the same ethnocentrism, power grabbing, influence peddling, buying of politicians, and media domination that they allegedly display in the United States. The speaker predicts that the United States will experience "Weimar conditions" and solutions similar to what happened in Germany, including a future Holocaust. The speaker believes the U.S. is heading in the same direction as Germany due to historical trends. The only difference is that the U.S. has more guns, lawlessness, and a revolutionary spirit.

The speaker states it is a miracle they have found each other, and that this is Germany's good fortune. They contrast this with other countries where masses are stirred up to attend protest rallies against fascism and national socialism, for Bolshevism, arms shipments, donations, and even people shipments. The speaker claims they have never called for people to attend a rally. They assert that if they ever do, all of Germany will be a single rally, with millions inflamed against the old adversary and hereditary enemy of humanity.

Adolf Hitler opens with a May Day address, declaring the day sacred for the Deutsche Volksgenossen and calling on the German people to recognize that all who contribute to national work must stand together, pledging to defend German honor, equal rights, and European peace. He proclaims that the Führer has spoken and that the German people should stand behind him in steadfast loyalty. Speaker 1 emphasizes that he speaks with the authority of someone who has grown from among the people, having stood beside them in wartime and through hardship, and who rose through diligence, learning, and hunger. He asserts personal continuity with his earlier self and recalls his experiences during the war, noting a rise from within the common ranks. Hitler or the extemporaneous speakers describe the labor force and the masses, noting perceived achievements within three months of focused effort and claiming that the German people have engaged in national tasks only tied to their own volk (people). The text asserts that the nation’s struggle was borne by the German farmer and worker, and that the people should not be meddled with by outsiders who “live everywhere and nowhere,” a critique of rootless international interest groups. Speaker 3 laments that Volkerstrife is fomented by a small, rootless international clique seeking to prevent peace, and emphasizes that the volk is bound to its soil, homeland, and living conditions. The speaker envisions a future where the German Volk can finally be treated with respect in international affairs and where peace is attainable if the nation remains united. Speaker 4 articulates a request for the German people to judge him for his work, urging them to vote in his favor if he has served them well. He addresses the common German, criticizing those who resist sacrifices and who fail to understand the benefits of shared burdens, such as the “Eintopfsonntag” (one-pot Sunday) and broader wartime austerity, arguing that these measures supported millions of people, including children. Speaker 1 reflects on the denial of Marxism as a political objective and frames the split in the nation as a betrayal of workers, contrasting it with a supposed commitment to a peaceful, unified Germany that does not threaten other nations. He praises a disciplined, orderly implementation of National Socialism and recounts how the movement, once small, has grown through sacrifice and loyalty to the Führer. Speaker 5 and Speaker 2 discuss the Party’s long-term goals: the movement started with two principles—be a true world-views party and seize power in Germany. They claim the nation’s future rests on a unified, disciplined people with a strong political leadership alongside the army. The youth are envisioned to be educated to reject class distinctions, to endure hardship, and to perpetuate German unity even after the older generation passes. The movement promises a peaceful future and asserts that Germany will now pursue collaboration with other nations, while insisting that no German must reject the communal labor that binds the Reich together. In closing, Hitler/Hitler-adjacent speakers celebrate the creation of a “new Germany” symbolized by the spade as a sign of a new community, a revolution accomplished by the people’s will, with a warning to enemies that the nation will stand firm and endure, and that unemployment has fallen as the nation builds a shared future. The address asserts that the next collective appeal will once again demonstrate the unity and resilience of the German Volk.

The hyperinflation in Germany attracted attention to Berlin, known as a hub of depraved sexual activities. Cultural Marxist Jews were blamed for introducing decadence and immorality into German culture, making Berlin a symbol of immorality in the 1920s. Moral boundaries were blurred, and anything was accepted.

Speaker 1 argues there is a political revolution underway, stating: "The Germans have been on the national apology tour for eighty years, apologizing to everyone in sight for all the terrible evil things they did and for, quote, unquote, starting the second World War." He adds: "The truth is the Germans did not start the second World War." He claims: "Everything that happened in Germany was a reaction to communism, Bolshevism in Russia, the emergence of Stalin's Russia, and the fear of communism, and the mass murder programs in the Soviet Union and the interwar years." He notes: "The Germans and they're not the only ones. Virtually all the Europeans were horrified by it." He contends this is the phony narrative that was created, that this happened exclusively in a vacuum, that Hitler woke up and decided to start a world war, and calls it "phony" and "misleading" and "fundamentally wrong." He concludes: "The Germans need to put an end to the apology tour." He adds: "Perhaps they will because it's gotten them into this position they are now." "They are now a nation living on on the precipice of poverty and destruction."

Speaker 1 argues that emancipation, granting Jews citizenship in European nations, marked the beginning of a catastrophe. He claims this granted equality to a people who have always existed “as a nation within nations,” and that this transformation happened gradually, leading to Jews obtaining every right of native Germans. He connects this to changes in economic life, asserting that a new international financial order centered in the stock exchange and banks operates “according to principles entirely foreign to the German character,” with foreigners’ interests opposed to the welfare of their people. He contrasts Western Europe and Central Europe, noting that in England and France industrialization drew farm workers into cities but the foreign element remained small and blendable, whereas in his view the German experience differed. Speaker 1 then critiques democracy as manipulation of the masses, describing it as the rule of quantity over quality, designed to make people believe they are free while serving purposes they do not understand. He explains a cycle of two or three opposing parties, a public spectacle of choice, and a constant invocation of “freedom” that forfeits real freedom as opinion is controlled by others. Germany’s path is described as different: loyalty has historically centered on the monarch, the army, and the state, with German industry having the potential to unite workers with traditional German institutions rather than oppose them. When the workers’ movement is captured, the working class’ legitimate grievances are diverted into an international, class-based struggle rather than a national one. Speaker 1 condemns Marxism as teaching that property is theft and that everything must be held in common, arguing that honest Germans would reject such a doctrine. He laments the replacement of leadership with professional agitators whose loyalty lies elsewhere, citing Russia as the final destination of this power: a once-great civilization reduces to chaos, churches plundered, productive classes destroyed, millions starving, and a nation transformed into a colony exploited by those in power. He asserts that Germany’s economy deteriorates daily, prices rise, wages fall, and both the stock exchange and speculators prosper while workers suffer. Political life is described as a circus, with foreign powers displacing Germany’s interests. He contends that “powerful interests” profit from German weakness, and that disarmament and submission were met with continued disrespect and demands. Speaker 1 states that Germans are awakening, rejecting old slogans, and recognizing that international solidarity harms them. He proposes an alternative path: a genuinely national and social movement, where the welfare of the nation precedes profits of speculators and theories of internationalists. He defines socialism as recognizing that prosperity depends on all Germans and that a nation cannot thrive while millions live in misery. Nationalism is framed as recognizing a unique German character, heritage, and destiny, with a duty to the German people first. He envisions a movement where workers and managers, farmers and scholars, unite for common goals, resisting those who exploit German weakness. Speaker 0 contextualizes: this speech was delivered in Munich in 1922; eleven years later, Hitler became chancellor, and the ideology would lead to World War II and the Holocaust, with 6,000,000 Jews and millions of others perishing. The primary source is presented for historical and educational purposes.

Germany before the war had a high standard of living, with benefits like loans for marriage and children. After the war, the city was in ruins, with millions of Germans dying under Allied brutality. General Patton lamented the destruction of a good race and the spread of communism. Women in Berlin faced violence, and allies of Germany fought against communism, including democracies like Finland and Romania.

German history is questioned regarding the treatment of Jews and the rise of Nobel Prize winners. The speaker predicts a similar fate for the United States due to power struggles and influence. The comparison is made to Weimar conditions in Germany and the potential for a similar outcome in the US. The speaker suggests that the US may face a similar collapse as seen in East Germany and the Soviet Union, but notes the presence of guns and a revolutionary spirit in American society.

The transcript describes the Weimar Republic (1918–1933) as a dark era for Germany, naming it a period defined by degeneracy, hopelessness, poverty, and death. Poverty intensified after the Versailles Treaty, with hyperinflation attributed to Jewish influences over the monetary system. It states that 4,000,000,000 marks equaled 1 US dollar and that people used money as fuel for fire, with the ink on banknotes more valuable than the money itself, leading to widespread desperation and over twenty-five thousand suicides annually. Unemployment exceeded five million, and prostitution was rampant, with some cities reporting that one in three women resorted to it, including along with their daughters. It claims child trafficking and prostitution were common, with children on street corners holding signs listing prices for sexual acts, which could be ordered and delivered. The transcript asserts that nationalists and communists were killing each other in the streets. It characterizes the era as marked by Jewish domination of banks, media, industries, academia, and law, claiming that Jews owned 150 private banks in Berlin despite being less than 1% of the population, and that Germans owned only 11. It further claims that most cinemas, newspapers, and publications were in Jewish hands. It references the Frankfurt School for Critical Theory and asserts that Jews pushed a list of degeneracy onto Germany, including destruction of the family, destruction of tradition, destruction of culture, multiracialism, weakening of nation-states, political correctness and intolerance, democratization and emancipation, equality dogma, equality of sexes, homosexualization of society, ideological loss of reality, promiscuity, and destruction of environmental protection requirements. A quote attributed to a Jewish doctor allegedly summarizing these aims is provided: “Whilst large sections of the German nation were struggling for the preservation of their race, We Jews filled the streets of Germany with our vociferations. We supplied the press with articles on the subject of its Christmas and Easter and administered to its religious beliefs in the manner we considered suitable. We ridiculed the highest ideals of the German nation and profaned the matters which it holds sacred.” The quote is attributed to Doctor Manfred Reifer in the German Jewish magazine Chernowitzer Allegemein Zeitung, September 1933. The transcript concludes by stating that Adolf Hitler removed Jews from positions of influence in mass media, literature, art, music, journalism, cinema, and popular entertainment.

The speaker claims to have solved internal problems without harming others, seeking no glory through violence. They assert Germany has not caused suffering, taken anything unjustly, or threatened anyone, repeatedly offering friendship. Despite this, they allege a smear campaign persists, falsely claiming Germany will invade Austria, fueled by agitators who desire no peace. These agitators are identified as a small, international clique that thrives on stirring up mistrust, known from within Germany itself. The speaker praises Germany's unified leadership and the growing consideration among its people, expressing pride in being their Fuhrer. They describe being moved by the sight of German workers and believe other nations, if they saw this peaceful, laboring folk, would reject the agitators and understand Germany's role as a guarantor of European order and human culture. The speech concludes with a call to pledge dedication to the German Volk and Reich.

The United States is in a state of decline, with no clear identity. Monuments are being defaced and destroyed, erasing our heritage. In Germany, Olaf Schulz is using the pretext of preparing for a fight with Russia to suppress opposition within the country. Similar fates await other Western governments, as their populations have had enough and will replace them with new leaders who are not like the current ones.

The speaker visited Germany in 1933 because the papers were full of what was happening there. Someone offered to introduce her to Hitler, and she was extremely interested, as everyone was at the time. Upon meeting him, she found him to be a very interesting and fascinating man. The speaker emphasizes that Hitler was charming and completely different from anyone she had ever met. She notes that he possessed something special to rise from being an out-of-work painter to dictator of Germany. When asked about Hitler's responsibility for the deaths of 6,000,000 Jews, the speaker states that it is inexcusable. She says the man she knew was not someone she could have believed capable of such acts. She also points out that other dictators have killed more people than Hitler, yet were still visited and found charming by world leaders long after committing their crimes. She initially didn't believe the reports of atrocities, but eventually accepted them.

In the 1930s, Hitler was given power by the wealthy, powerful, and complacent elite who thought they could control him. They believed his extreme views were just for show. However, like other dictators, Hitler brought death and despair. Millions of Germans thought it couldn't happen there. In 1933, Germany was wrong. The speaker questions if the same mistake will be made today. Hitler asks if he will become a dictator, to which he denies.

Speaker 0 describes a stance to attack only on the front lines, not against women or children, noting that “that was a data loss,” and that they “did it to all fronts” and “we did not fly a night attack.” He argues that since bombs would be dropped anyway, before the German people he cannot permit his own Volksgenossen to perish while sparing foreigners, so the war must be fought and the sacrifices available must be used. Speaker 1, after acknowledging that he cannot deny this any longer, refers to himself as “the greatest strategist born so far” and declares that the Luftkrieg (air war) is his doing. He calls it a brilliant idea by Mister Georgill against the civilian population, noting England apparently rejected this in anticipation of future developments. He asserts that in this war he did not conduct night attacks on civilian populations in Poland, arguing that at night the objective cannot be hit as accurately, so he primarily targeted roofs and aimed at military targets. He says he did the same in Norway, Holland, and France. He contrasts this with a belief that the British Air Force would be unable to escape German scrutiny if night raids targeted civilians, implying that the German campaign aimed at military targets. As the war in the West ended, he extended his efforts toward “Henglad,” and faced pressure from many to act sooner: “how long, Führer, do you wait? They do not stop.” He waited over three months and then gave the order to commence the fight with the same resolve with which he had started every battle, continuing “up to now.” Speaker 2 portrays the enemy as incredibly cruel and determined to destroy Germany, stating that the enemy has proclaimed this thousands of times, and asserting that there is no reason to doubt it. He intensifies the claim by equating the enemies’ motives with biblical purge concepts, describing a wish for Germany’s extermination with “Mann und Maus und Jung und Alt.” He emphasizes that what would be done to German women and children cannot be imagined, urging that it will be a total war that affects every German, their lives, existence, family, wife, and child—the war threatens life itself. He concludes that wherever now flourishing cities and villages exist, a future of desolation would result, turning into a desert; the war, he says, is total and affects everyone.

Speaker 0 argues that it’s logistically absurd to claim the Holocaust involved gassing millions and hauling bodies from so-called gas chambers, noting the inefficiency of that method. He points out the irony that the person most famous for gassing people refused to use gas that could have won the war, because he would not be the first to use gas, despite having 20,000 kilograms of tabun and sarin. He asserts there were no counters to that chemical weapon, yet the decision not to use gas led to the downfall of his country. Speaker 1 adds that Hitler was gassed himself at the end of World War I, which blinded him. During the fall of the Kaiser’s empire, the Reich’s collapse and the emergence of Bolshevik and Weimar structures occurred as some German states did not join the Weimar Republic and became sub-states or Soviet-like entities. Speaker 0 emphasizes that anyone uncertain about Hitler’s legacy should read Mein Kampf and hear from Hitler’s own words to understand why he held his beliefs. He claims Hitler did not begin as an anti-Semite intent on killing Jews, and describes Hitler as someone who admired and observed the universe, was a truth-seeker from day one, engaged in political discussions, and was fascinated by philosophy, German history, the British Empire, and America. He notes Hitler was well-read and well-spoken, but deprived economically, working as a day laborer with little work available to feed himself. He claims Hitler went days without food to afford a book, showing a love of knowledge, and that he wasn’t a failed artist; he was a talented artist whose path could have been architecture rather than drawing. Speaker 0 contends that smear campaigns against Hitler fail and are “nonsense.” He dismisses more extreme claims as false, such as insults about Hitler’s sexuality or anatomy, and mentions that such accusations are common against many figures. Speaker 1 comments that a lot of the negative rumors about Hitler (e.g., perverse claims) are typical allegations made against many people, implying they are not unique to Hitler.

"In 1943, the communists will use the word Nazis, fascist, and antisemitic in order to push the public mind to make them believe something by using repetition." "Germany was arresting all the bankers because they were charging so much interest that they were destroying the country." "60,000,000 Germans died." "after World War two, all these generals in America actually realized they fought the wrong enemy. The enemy is within." "Even general Patton said we should have fought with the fascist against the communist, otherwise, our country will degrade." "There's also another part that was left out of the story." "Yes."

The speaker expresses that the German folk has come to love the audience and that they have become an integral part of national life. They are described as a component in the education of the folk and a bridge to young men in the army. The speaker contrasts Germany with a country where Marxism is attempting to gain power, where cities are in flames, villages are being reduced to rubble, and class is fighting against class. In contrast, the speaker claims to have joined the audience together, making them a foundation for the future of the folk and for the speaker's own faith. The speaker expresses faith in the German youth, considering them a splendid component of the folk.