reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We will lie to you when we meet, saying we don't care about you or remember you.

Frank Fugluzi stated on Friday's show that FBI director Kash Patel has reportedly been more visible at nightclubs than at FBI headquarters. This was a misstatement. The claim has not been verified.

Where's the third assassin? Show yourself. Third time's the charm, right? Not me, FBI. It’s someone else. I believe in you.

Bobby denies being the person in the video doing the chicken dance on a night vision camera.

He allegedly lied when asked if he was talking to other people. When a dozen people asked if he was talking to anybody, he allegedly said he did not have a roster and was not talking to anybody.

I want to clarify that I did not have sexual relations with Miss Lewinsky. However, I did have an inappropriate and wrong relationship with her.

The speaker was angry because someone lied to them about Epstein. The speaker then publicly stated in the Daily Mail that they believed David, but later discovered David was lying.

The speaker accuses someone of lying about a statement made by Mr. Grosskreutz. The person denies making up the statement, claiming it was fabricated 100%. The conversation is cut short by an objection. Translation: The speaker accuses someone of lying about a statement made by Mr. Grosskreutz. The person denies making up the statement, claiming it was fabricated 100%. The conversation is cut short by an objection.

I'm conducting a test to see if you can spot something in my video. Pay attention and tell me if you notice anything. The Secret Service missed something visible in the video.

Where's the third assassin? Show yourself! Third time's the charm, babe. Not me, FBI. It has to be someone else. I believe in you!

He arrives at her house late at night, leaves in the early morning, and texts her shortly after. The case involves Fannie Willis and her boyfriend lying under oath about their relationship timeline. Cell phone data contradicts their claims. Despite lacking experience, they lived lavishly together. The speaker questions if justice will be served for their perjury.

Speaker 0 questions if the person is their partner and accuses them of always lying. They express frustration but also acknowledge that they find the person's lies entertaining.

The discussion centers on allegations that Erica Kirk’s backstory has been exposed as a lie. The speakers claim that, while she lived in New York, there are indications she did date and drink, contrasting with statements that she avoided dating and did not drink. One concrete example cited is a photo of Erica Fronsbee with a glass of champagne, captioned “it’s Wednesday, so treat yourself to little champagne,” suggesting she did enjoy alcohol. Further evidence presented includes a 2017 image posted by internet sleuths showing Erica Fronsbee with Cabot Phillips, captioned, “yes. we’re that couple who gets painting lessons together.” The image is interpreted as indicating they were more than just a one-off date, implying they were an actual couple. The speakers note that Cabot Phillips was at one point Charlie Kirk’s producer and is now a senior editor at The Daily Wire. They add that Phillips recently spoke about “how to lead like Charlie,” and that the speaker believes Phillips “is not from this world of media,” describing the situation as “incestuity.” The narrative is broadened to claim that Erica was dating before Charlie, which is described as normal, but there is also mention of her being engaged, perhaps even married. Luna Bear Studios is cited with a post from 03/16/2015, praising Erica Fransvi and JT Massey, stating, “Erica Fransvi and JT Massey, you both are amazing humans, and I love shooting you so much laughter and love. It was perfection.” This is used to argue that her entire image is built on something not true. A recurring question posed is why Erica would lie about being a conservative woman, with the assertion that such deception would be visible online, concluding that “the Internet is undefeated.” The speakers imply that Erica’s public persona as a conservative woman is inconsistent with the alleged past relationships and activities documented in the posts and photos. The overall claim is that there are contradictions between her claimed identity and her dating and social media history, challenging the authenticity of her presented backstory.

The discussion highlights inconsistencies at Amy’s scene: she was right-handed, but the gun was found on the left side of her body. Confidential sources spoke on the record to other journalists, noting heavy intelligence involvement on the scene. No coroner report or autopsy has been released yet, though it’s expected to be explored during the forthcoming investigation. As Amy’s story gained public attention, Daily Mail headlines were described as misleading, contributing to a broader media spread that included CNN and Fox News. A set of texts from a man named Sam, which have since been erased, are introduced for context. One post from Sam presenting Amy’s messages describes death threats Amy had received daily for her recent work, claiming surveillance after she “crossed some line” with her independently developed theory. She mentions leaving a voice note on a hacked phone about “super, heedy shit” she had figured out, followed by ongoing “daily death threats.” She asserts she did not kill herself, telling people close to her over the past few days that it is “simply impossible to take them all out,” and asks what can be told about Sam and these texts, noting there are more. Speaker 0 explains that Sam Reid was Amy’s business partner in the Geometric Energy Corporation (GEC), formed with Sam and Chantel, and that Sam was a very close friend of Amy. The texts indicate Amy was updating him about what happened to him as well; reading the streams reveals Sam and Amy were both affected. Sam is portrayed as someone Amy relied on and trusted as a best friend, with whom she shared substantial history and company involvement. Following this, it’s noted that Sam removed the tweets, leading to questions about possible consequences for him. The speaker reflects on misleading headlines, citing an example that stated, “eleventh scientists found dead,” which mischaracterizes the situation since Amy died four years ago. The speaker refrains from speculating on Sam Reid’s motives for deleting the texts, stating they do not know him personally and that it wouldn’t be fair to speculate about his motivations. The core point remains: Sam deleted the texts, which is considered noteworthy. Fact of the matter remains that Sam erased the texts, and this action is highlighted within the discussion.

Furio, she pushed him back; that is what happened.

The discussion centers on sunspots as evidence supporting a broader “Moon Map” theory, with a focus on how sun, moon, and star rays interact. The sequence reviews parts seven through ten, explaining that cosmic rays from the Sun, Moon, and Stars refract off a firmament to transform atmospheric molecules into plasma states. The overlap of the conical sun ray with the moon ray is tied to the moon’s phases, as the sun ray overpowers the moon ray’s weaker light. Lunar eclipses are attributed to an overlap of the Venus or Mercury rays. The group then shifts to sunspots and their causes, presenting a photo comparison of sunspots from space weather data against astronomical positions relative to the sun. A key claim is that sunspots correspond to star cluster formations, described as an overlap of the star rays with the sun’s ray. The speakers display examples of different star clusters occurring at the same time and question the odds that these clusters would be present and located correctly with respect to the sun. They extend this examination to a year-long view, asking whether sunspot clusters consistently match star ray patterns rotating across the sun, and noting that inside the sun disk there is a neutralization of sunlight, which accounts for the darkness inside. Speaker 1 adds several provocative interpretations. They state that sunspots are holes that allow observation inside the sun, which is described as hollow and dark inside. They challenge conventional physics by asserting that the sun does not operate by fusion and that fusion is not the primary operation of the sun; rather, the arcs and current density produce hydrogen diffusion, implying the sun itself is not a fusion device. Fusion is described as an effect or converter, transforming from another dimensionality into our dimensionality. The conversion is said to be incomplete until it enters Earth’s atmosphere or other physical matter, at which point electromagnetic light is produced. The outer solar envelope is described as undefined, with references to Wilhelm Reich and the idea that scars cannot be seen inside. The sun’s energy is described as photovoltaic energy, an electrophysical conversion from a primary force to a secondary force, with the conversion becoming complete once it interacts with the outer atmosphere; after interaction with matter, emission reverts to a reduced form of heat, light, and mechanical activity. The origin is labeled as undefined, allegedly coming from a "counter space" or another dimension with holes inside the hollow sun. The photosphere is described as generating light and being contiguously arranged through little glowing spots with dark gaps in between, forming a veil. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 intoning, “The truth will set us free.”

I have full custody of our kids due to my ex-wife's behavior. She owes over $21,000 in child support, was arrested for check fraud, stole $1,000,000, and faked cancer. She is not a full-time mom, goes out often, and lacks a job. She is not an inspiration for single moms. Respect to hardworking single moms. This is who she really is. Peace. Translation: The speaker has full custody of their children because their ex-wife has not fulfilled her responsibilities. She owes a significant amount in child support, has been involved in criminal activities, and has lied about having cancer. The speaker believes she is not a good role model for single mothers and wants others to know the truth about her.

The presentation offers a counter view to the mainstream narrative that polio has been eradicated in India. It begins by outlining the official timeline: in 1988, India joined a global commitment to eradicate polio by 2000; India conducted pulse polio immunization drives starting in 1995; officially in 2011 India recorded zero polio cases, and in 2014 the World Health Organization confirmed polio eradication in India. An alternate view is then presented by examining definitions and data. Definition and data issues: the definition of polio changed after 1996. Before 1996, polio cases were diagnosed clinically by physicians; after 1996, India adopted WHO guidelines relying on diagnostics and tests, including detecting polio viruses in stool specimens. In 1997, the definition changed. If a consistent definition is applied (the “old definition” line in a graph), polio was not eradicated but renamed; clinically compatible cases not meeting the WHO criteria were counted as nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis (AFP). Using the WHO definition, polio would appear eradicated, but with a consistent definition, AFP cases rose after 2003–2004, despite intensive pulse polio campaigns. Doctor Yashpal, a former member of India’s polio eradication committee, is cited: up to 1996, all reported AFP cases were labeled as polio; CDC is said to have confirmed that pre-1997 polio cases were reported by attending physicians with no standard case definition. The result is described as deception if one uses a consistent definition. Age and incidence: post-1997, AFP tracking focused on children 15 years and under; cases in older individuals may not be counted, implying higher numbers could exist across all ages. Causes and triggers of polio before 1997: literature notes two major factors. First, intramuscular injections were implicated in triggering a large share of paralytic polio cases (about 67% of paralytic polio). Second, there is a strong correlation between DDT/insecticide use and polio incidence: DDT consumption declined from 12.5 tons in 1980 to 4.4 tons in 1996, and agricultural DDT use peaked in 1978 and was banned in 1989; polio cases declined 1980–1996, aligning with reduced DDT use. This is presented as evidence that injections and environmental poisonings contributed to clinically compatible polio cases, complicating the eradication narrative. Vaccination campaigns and side effects: the narrative asserts that a large majority of polio cases were vaccinated, with many children receiving multiple doses. Data cited include 60–73% of the eligible population vaccinated; in 2007–2009, 96% of polio cases had four or more doses, and in 2007, 85% had seven or more doses. It is argued that the vaccine itself can cause polio (labeled as non-polio CNS conditions) and that vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis and other adverse events occurred but were hidden from the public to boost vaccination uptake. There are references to nine AFP cases with immunization data, including one child with 15 doses and another with 25 doses; associations between oral polio vaccine and conditions like GBS, transverse myelitis, and facial paralysis are acknowledged. Safety and policy critiques: the OPV dosing schedule reportedly increased from the original three doses to seven, ten, and even up to 25 doses in India by 2006; the safety of such extensive dosing is questioned, with the Indian Medical Association cited as expressing concerns. Poliol’s 2017 study reportedly found a strong association between AFP incidence and cumulative vaccine doses. Gagandeep Kang (2017) is cited criticizing the adverse events following immunization (AEFI) system as inadequate, reviewing only about 100 cases per meeting across four meetings annually. Policy recommendations and conclusions: arguments against continuing polio vaccination include a lack of evidence of benefit and evidence of harm; calls for a road map for justice for vaccine victims and families for informed-consent violations and coercion; a call to review all vaccinations beyond polio; and a proposal to exit WHO and international pandemic treaties, asserting that sovereign nations should not follow the dictates of unelected global organizations. Additional context includes media reports of adverse events and compensation for vaccine victims.

Senator Booker, do you remember me? Did Lauren Marshawn write your tweets since you're a client of Effective Campaigns? Can you answer that, Samuel Booker?

Lincoln, when asked about communication methods, denies having any other means besides phone calls. However, a 2015 email surfaces where Hunter Biden requests Lincoln to grab a cup of coffee. Lincoln's response was a definite "absolutely."

The FBI is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server. The Wall Street Journal reports that 650,000 emails are sitting on Anthony Weiner's laptop, and thousands of those may involve Clinton's server since Weiner was married to Clinton's top aide when she was secretary of state. To cover up her crimes, she bleached and deleted 33,000 emails after receiving a congressional subpoena. A computer used by former congressman Anthony Weiner and his estranged wife, Huma Abedin, is now the focus of new inquiries. Sources say there could be as many as 650,000 emails on the computer with underlying metadata suggesting that thousands of those messages could have been sent to or from the private server that Mrs. Clinton used while she was secretary of state. The laptop had previously not come up in the Clinton email probe. Anthony Weiner’s laptop reportedly contained kill switches and was not released before. Weiner’s laptop is connected to an investigation into whether he sent sexually charged emails to a teenage minor; the laptop hadn’t previously come up in the Clinton probe. In an exclusive interview with Inside Edition, a minor says she first sent Weiner a message on Twitter in January 2016 when she was 15 years old. She says the messages quickly turned obscene, and she was disgusted, which contributed to her coming forward. At the time, Weiner's wife, Huma Abedin, was helping run Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. The FBI's investigation of Weiner's laptop led to the discovery of a new batch of emails that Clinton had sent to Abedin, which led former FBI director James Comey to reopen the investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server just days before the presidential election. Inside Edition says it is withholding the girl's name because she is underage, but her father gave permission for her face to be shown. Weiner pled guilty to a charge of transferring obscene material to a minor. Commentators note that Comey’s October 2016 reopening announcement was controversial, with some saying it cost Hillary Clinton the election. It is argued that the NYPD started investigating via subpoena and warrant, and they found 650,000 emails on Weiner’s laptop, including Clinton emails, Huma Abedin’s emails, and evidence pertaining to Clinton Foundation. They reportedly found state department emails and material including money laundering and references to a trip to Epstein’s “sex island,” with Clinton and Bill Clinton allegedly there multiple times. The material was given to the FBI, with threats to go public if the investigation wasn’t reopened or indictments issued. There is testimony that “nine cops watched the videos on Wiener's laptop,” and that those officers were later dead. Another account says there were 12 individuals who saw the laptop, and none are dead. Reports note a surge in NYPD suicides this year, with nine or more officers dying by suicide, including the latest at Queens General Hospital. One account links deputy chief Steven Silks to overseeing evidence from the Weiner laptop and to copies made of that evidence; Silks reportedly died by an alleged self-inflicted gunshot wound one month before mandatory retirement. Other rumors claim the laptop contained numerous emails from Hillary Clinton during her time as secretary of state, “insurance policy” files, and family involvement, with allegations that the FBI lost the laptop. A high-ranking NYPD official reportedly warned of grave contents and indicated others had copies of the information. Proponents argue that, if the Weiner laptop were released, the government would fall.

This is a bombshell revelation with huge implications. The issue at hand is not about a consensual relationship, but rather about lying to the court and potential financial gain. The speaker emphasizes that the credibility of the person in question is severely damaged. If she submitted false and inaccurate information to the court, what else has she lied about? This situation looks very bad for her, and the speaker believes the case is unlikely to succeed.