reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Vaccines date back to 1626 poisoning the people. Okay? Poisoning the people since 1626. This is not new. They're not like, oh, we got some new stuff, and it's not the snake venom or anything else. It's just poison is what it is. They've been poisoning the people since 1626 with vaccines. So no child, no adult, no grandma, no grandpa, no mother, no nothing needs any shots, whether it be tetanus, whether it be rabies, whether it be anything. You do not need to put any shots into your animal, your grandma, your father, your mother, your children. That's it. It's straight poison. And there's a great picture from 1885, and it says, vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. There is money in the side effects. That's it. That is all vaccines. Money in the side effects for the pharmaceutical companies to poison the people and just keep making money off of them. You go back into the nineteen hundreds and doctors used to claim there were no cases of cancer in an unvaccinated person. How about the Amish? The Amish don't put a single vaccine into their body, And you notice that the Amish look pretty darn healthy. Well, altogether. Why? They're not injecting themselves with poison. It makes no sense. So there's all these cultures who didn't use this garbage. And then as they now become like modernized and they start putting this garbage into them their body, then all of a sudden, people start coming down with all the same illnesses. I got autoimmune, lupus. I got allergies. I got this. I got that. Right? Right? All those things. Where do you think they're all stemming from? They get you as you're young because you don't have the ability to consent. Right? Tell that tell the doctor to take the needle and stick it in themselves. Give themselves their own boosters and vaccines. You don't need to do that. And I think people need to stand the ground with that because there has never been a single vaccine that has ever helped helped anybody.

The speaker claims that measles was not deadly in the US after the early 1900s, citing improved nutrition and later, Vitamin A treatment. They believe contracting measles can be beneficial, leading to increased resistance to certain diseases. Regarding an outbreak in Samoa, the speaker alleges that a measles vaccine caused deaths, not measles itself, and that they did not influence policy there. They maintain that vaccines cause autism, referencing a CDC study on the hepatitis B vaccine that showed an elevated risk. They accuse the CDC of fraud, claiming a scientist named Paul Thornson produced a study to create the illusion that vaccines don't cause autism, stole money, and is now a fugitive. The speaker states there are hundreds of studies linking vaccines to autism and neurological injuries. They accuse the CDC of being controlled by the pharmaceutical industry.

Speaker 0 ties Operation Warp Speed to Pfizer. "They're doing a huge investment into bringing more drugs into America and also coming up with a vaccine that's to solve cancer." He states, "vaccination is the cause of cancer. I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person." He adds that people "died suddenly after taking the vaccines and boosters," and that "during 1986, government decided to put an act in to protect Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, and all these companies from lawsuits." He alleges the military as test subjects: "Soldiers disabled and killed by vaccinations, April. No wounds, no damages, no shots, just vaccines." He recalls 1885: "Vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. There's money in it. Money in the side effects." He asks, "See those people holding down that person and vaccinating them?" Mentions Murder by Injection and The Poison Needle. Speaker 1: "No, I'm a big believer in vaccines. Polio vaccine. Big, big believer in vaccines."

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

The transcript discusses the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean, claiming that vaccination goes against the constitution to take this “garbage.” It asserts that most people don’t know that doctors do not take the shots themselves or give them to their own children, yet they administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. It notes that certain physicians have observed patterns such as paralysis within twenty-four hours after the injection, up to six months after, cancer near the injection area, and diseases such as TB within twenty years. The speaker claims that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern in 1796, describing it as poisoning the people. The question is posed: why do they do this? The answer given is that vaccination is a big business, and that it is protected by the government. The speaker asserts that vaccination was protected by the government in 1986 so that people cannot sue. It is stated as part of the argument that vaccination is the leading cause of why children die under the age of 15.

W.B. Clark, an author from Indiana in 1936, claimed to have never seen a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person. This statement, along with similar claims from other doctors, suggests that vaccinations may act as a time bomb within the human body. The effects of vaccination can manifest years later, potentially leading to strokes or heart attacks. Once introduced, the vaccine remains in the system indefinitely, always seen as a foreign entity within the body.

The speaker discusses rabies and vaccines in a conspiratorial frame, arguing that rabies is fake and that the treatment and vaccine are worse than the disease. They state that the vaccine is claimed to be mandatory, but argue that mandating is “voluntary to a service” and that the true situation is a game where “mandatory” only applies once you agree to it. They claim the test for rabies is the same as used during the pandemic, asserting that “the fruit came up positive for an illness,” and suggest that this demonstrates that “we’ve been lied to,” with implications that vets benefit from the situation. The speaker recounts an historical diagnostic method: in the early nineteen hundreds, rabbits were the primary diagnostic tool to determine if an animal had rabies. They describe a procedure where, if a person was bitten by a suspected dog, “the brain tissue of the dog was injected into the two rabbits,” and “If the two rabbits died, rabies was proven.” They present this as the science behind rabies diagnosis. They then criticize the vaccine’s safety, claiming “that vaccine comes with a lot of side effects.” They cite an example case: “38 dogs and cats took the new vaccine that was made out by Merck,” and claim that these subjects “started having seizures, aggression, and death,” concluding with the statement that the vaccine is portrayed as “Safe and effective” by others. On a path to alternatives, the speaker says you could find a holistic vet who will give a medical exemption so you don’t have to receive the vaccine, or you could simply say no. They claim that if a vet “doesn’t wanna play ball,” you can make them sign a vaccination guarantee that nothing will happen to your animal after taking the injection, and predict that the vet “won’t sign it.” The segment ends with a provocative note encouraging skepticism about viruses, followed by the assertion that if you are unvaccinated and the virus enters your community, the virus will … (the clip ends here with an incomplete thought, implying a cautionary consequence).

In 1936, Dr. Clark of Indiana stated that he never saw cancer in unvaccinated individuals, which was surprising. Other doctors have also warned that vaccinations can act as a time bomb in the body, potentially causing health issues like stroke or heart attack years later. The vaccine remains in the system indefinitely, acting as a foreign entity.

- The speaker asserts that there has never been a single animal with rabies and claims animals are injected to keep veterinarians in business. - If a vet recommends rabies shots, the speaker says you should fire them, alleging the shots promote poison to immunize and then cause a debilitating disease, creating a lifetime patient. - The speaker claims there are no rabid dogs roaming about, and that rabies is fabricated. - They describe the origin of rabies studies as involving rabid dogs kept in cages that went nuts, with the vaccine being placed in the dogs’ heads after they died, and claim this demonstrated the vaccine’s effectiveness. - The speaker asserts that today dogs are still injected for rabies to poison the dogs and create lifelong patients. - Two books are cited as debunking this view: The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan and The Poison Needle by Eleanor McBean. - The speaker generalizes that professionals, including vets and doctors, are there to keep you as a patient for life.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

Vaccines eradicated smallpox and polio. The speaker was taught that vaccines are safe, effective, and necessary, and there's no reason to question it. Medical school rotations reinforced that vaccines are safe and effective, and the speaker was told to ignore the inserts because that's lawyer jargon. Medical school provided no education about vaccine contents, safety records, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program. The speaker assumed the science was settled and didn't question vaccines.

The speaker claims that this is not conspiracy theory and cites a BMJ publication by Retzaf Levy, which describes a process in vaccine development: vaccines were trialed under one formulation, but when the decision was made to deploy them globally, the process was changed and the product injected to the rest of the world. The speaker asserts that changing the process requires new trials, yet the EMA asked for an additional trial of 250 people after the process change, and that data was never delivered. This is described as a “bait and switch,” asserted as crucial for understanding why trial data is of zero consequence to what’s seen in the field, implying that real-world outcomes do not match trial data and that the numbers from trials are a caricature of field performance. The speaker claims Pfizer had early data indicating what would happen and acted on that by acquiring cancer companies: $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium is described as focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker (CD Adaptor 147) on them, a marker claimed to be known to be involved in COVID. The implication is that Pfizer is building an investment portfolio in cancer companies that would benefit from the consequences the speaker alleges they caused. In summary, the vaccines on the market are said to be not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials, labeling this a “bait and switch” and a fraud, and asserting that vaccine effectiveness numbers are not reliable because the products differ from trial formulations and because those numbers decay over time. The speaker alleges significant DNA contamination, stating that 10 out of 11 studies have found this, with the remaining studies allegedly constrained by financial conflicts. The claim is that consensus among real studies supports DNA contamination, with several studies through peer review, which the speaker notes is difficult for those papers to pass through peer review. It is claimed that five peer-reviewed studies not originally examining contamination found DNA in blood and tissue upon sleuthing. The speaker asserts that cancer is on the rise and that several papers report cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the site of injection. The claim is that this situation cannot be dismissed as coincidence and is described as “liability free” and often mandated. The speaker posits that this may be the largest carcinogenic hit to the human population, with vaccines on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women, stating that “this has gone absolutely off the rails.”

The transcript argues that discussions of vaccines should be approached as part of eugenics, claiming that this is where the concept originates. It then cites medical claims attributed to “doctor Henry,” stating that “numerous vaccinations” and the “medical monopoly” have caused “more disease and suffering than I could name.” The speaker claims that diseases such as cancer, syphilis, and cold sores are “direct result[s] of vaccination.” Next, it references “doctor Herbert Snow,” asserting that doctors are “always fire[d]” and claiming that in recent years “many women and men in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly.” The speaker says this resembles 2020 and claims that after attending a feast or banquet, “eighty percent of the deaths are caused by inoculation or vaccination.” Finally, it cites “doctor Clark,” claiming that cancer was “practically unknown” until vaccinations with cowpox vaccine were introduced. The speaker adds personal testimony: the speaker “had to deal with at least two hundred cases of cancer” and “never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”

The speaker claims colored vaccines are dangerous, with no clinical benefit and over 10,000,000 deaths worldwide. They suggest avoiding vaccination altogether, citing studies showing unvaccinated kids are healthier. They criticize censorship by the government and medical boards, leading to job loss and license revocation for speaking out against the narrative. The medical journals are also deemed corrupt. Speaker 1 mentions not every batch causes harm, as they themselves took a few shots without issue.

The discussion ties vaccines to eugenics and then cites multiple doctors’ claims about harm from vaccination. Henry is described as saying that, in his honest opinion, vaccines have caused more disease and suffering than he could name, and that diseases such as cancer, syphilis, and cold sores are direct results of vaccination. Herbert Snow is described as arguing that, in recent years, many women and men in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly, and that often, after attending a feast or banquet, about eighty percent of deaths are caused by inoculation or vaccination. Doctor Clark is presented as saying that cancer was practically unknown until vaccinations with cowpox vaccine were introduced, that he dealt with at least two hundred cancer cases, and that he never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.

They say that at the turn of the century of 1900, there was an idea that cancer was parasites. The speaker plans a presentation on cancerous parasites. He describes a man in Oklahoma who used chickens and dosed them with parasites. The chickens would develop tumors and would eventually be killed by the parasite infestation, which looked like cancer. The speaker notes that they did not have modern vaccines and instead used inoculations that were crude bacterial detritus, such as pus from the smallpox vaccine, which was cowpox. He explains that the practice involved cutting the skin and rubbing in the material. Two things are observed since they started doing that: cancer began to appear, tuberculosis or a lung/pneumonic problem began to rise, and heart disease became more common. He states these are the same three things seen now. The Oklahoma man showed that if you gave the parasite to the chicken and that was all you did, the chicken died, but not long before its normal lifespan. However, if you gave them the parasite and then gave them any vaccine, which they called a virus fix or a viral fixative, the chickens died in short order. The speaker recalls reading that and interprets it as evidence of a bio weapons program in process. He emphasizes that this goes way back and that it is really scary stuff.

Today, we’ll explore Operation Warp Speed and its historical context. In 1909, Dr. Clark claimed vaccinations caused cancer, noting he never saw cancer in unvaccinated individuals. In 1887, Saint Saviors Cancer Hospital echoed this sentiment. The push for vaccinations dates back to 1885, where financial motives behind vaccines were highlighted. Misinformation about smallpox vaccines emerged in 1880, and in 1799, Dr. Jenner’s smallpox vaccine led to deaths, sparking outrage among medical professionals. A tragic case involved a father whose vaccinated daughter died the next day, symbolized by the Raggedy Ann doll. This history raises questions about the narrative that vaccines can cure cancer.

The discussion centers on the claim that SIDS is a “vaccine death.” It states that seventy five percent of all deaths from SIDS happened within seven days of a vaccination. The conversation then shifts to polio. It references “Polio, forty eight hour safety review trial” and says the safety review lasted “forty eight hours, two days.” It also brings up President Roosevelt, described as “famous for having polio in the wheelchair,” and adds that he “had transverse myelitis.” A response rejects the polio framing: “No way. Didn’t have polio.” The speaker disputes trust in doctors’ knowledge of vaccines, saying, “How can you sit here and say doctors don’t know anything about vaccines?” Another claim follows that “a doctor is lucky if they have a half a day education on vaccines,” and that “I have yet to find a pediatrician that can list the ingredients of any vaccines.” The speaker further asserts, “They don’t know anything at all.” A broader argument is made about vaccine testing and timing for children. The speaker claims that “99.5 of our children are getting a product that was tested for five days” and says this product was tested “for a disease they will not come in contact with until they’re an adult.” The speaker adds “and hopefully never,” linking this to a belief about later behavior: “if they were raised correctly, will find themselves sharing heroin needles or sleeping with prostitutes.” The conclusion of the argument is presented as a belief that uncovering these “truth” points will expose broader wrongdoing: “I do believe when people see the truth on this, it will reveal everything that’s corrupt about the world that you live in.”

The speaker traces the origins and contents of vaccines from their earliest forms to modern childhood vaccines, presenting a sequence of claimed ingredients and comparisons. - The concept of a vaccine is said to have started from the word cowpox, with the idea that “cow pus” was used. Pus from cows was rubbed into wounds on people, leading to early vaccines. - They claim that practitioners experimented for a long time with various substances, including horse pus and cow pus from an infected horse’s hoof, rubbed into people. - Early vaccines are described as being steeped for years in a mix of ox bile, glycerin, and potato slices, which the speaker notes sounds like a joke but asserts to be true. - The evolution then moves to more modern-but-old-time ingredients, listing dried rabbit spinal cords, duck embryos, chicken blood, human bile (because it shouldn’t be wasted), ground-up rat spleens, and boiled pigskin as examples of earlier vaccine components. Switching to modern day vaccines, the speaker enumerates what is said to be present in today’s childhood vaccines: - Gelatin from boiled pigskin, described as similar to the old ingredient. - Chicken embryo protein. - Blood from the hearts of cow fetuses. - DNA fragments from human fetuses. - Oil extracted from shark livers. - Proteins from worm ovaries. - DNA fragments from monkey kidneys. The speaker then invokes a Shakespearean reference to Macbeth—“eye of Newt, toe of frog, lizard’s leg, tongue of dog”—to emphasize the appearance of a witch’s brew-like mixture in the composition of vaccines, suggesting that Gates, Offit, and Hotez are “sitting around in their witch’s brew putting this stuff together.” Further modern ingredients in childhood vaccines are listed: - Formaldehyde, described as bad. - Polysorbate eighty, claimed to be linked to infertility. - Potassium chloride, called out as the chemical injected as the third injection in lethal injections by executioners, noting that infants receive far less of it than executed individuals. - Sodium borate. - Triton X. - Ethyl mercury, stated as having been used “until very recently.” The speaker concludes with a strong personal stance: “I don’t want mercury injected into my kids. Period.” They recount a memory of a broken light requiring hazmat handling for mercury, contrasting that with the alleged injection of mercury into babies, and labeling the overall situation as crazy.

Speaker 0 notes: “we’d had the smallpox vaccine for nearly fifty years and hadn't eradicated it, weren't even sure that it was working, and that's when they decided we need to mandate this.” He calls it “the greatest ad campaign that has ever been,” and contrasts COVID: “COVID… has a death rate of less than zero point five percent… 99.5 percent of humanity is not going to die from this thing.” He asks which product would sell: “the point five percent” or “the ninety nine point five percent need to take.” Speaker 1 adds: “Parliament idea comes passed the Vaccine Act of 1853… eerily similar to what we saw during COVID,” Jenner’s idea spreads; by 1853 vaccination is widespread, yet “the worst smallpox outbreak in history” occurs in 1871 in Leicester; “Jenner and nor did anyone else in the entire nineteenth century know the causative agent of smallpox.” “We scraped some pus. We don't know what the agent is.” “We have no idea how this thing's working.” “To this day, the whole thing is a mystery.” Pasteur is depicted as fraudster; “Louis Pasteur proclaims a vaccine for waterfowl… anthrax vaccine for animals,” “self promotion becomes huge,” and media fear is used repeatedly.

The speaker states they would not give their children the measles, mumps vaccine, claiming that measles was deadly in the early 1900s, but is now easily survivable, especially with Vitamin A. They claim studies show that contracting measles can make children healthier and more resistant to diseases later in life. The speaker denies causing a measles outbreak in Samoa, stating the Prime Minister had already banned the vaccine after deaths, and that people died from a bad vaccine imported from Australia, not measles. The speaker asserts that vaccines cause autism, citing a CDC study that showed an elevated risk of autism in children who received the hepatitis B vaccine within their first 30 days. They claim that studies disproving this link were fraudulent, conducted by "biostitutes" paid by the CDC, and that the lead scientist, Paul Thorensen, is a fugitive wanted for stealing money. The speaker claims there are hundreds of studies linking vaccines to autism and neurological injuries.

The transcript references the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean and presents several assertions about vaccines and the vaccination system. It claims that the book argues taking vaccines is unconstitutional and labels vaccines as “garbage,” suggesting that vaccination is a large, protected industry. It asserts that doctors do not take the shots themselves, do not give them to their own children, but administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. The speaker states that some physicians have noticed patterns associated with vaccines, including paralysis within twenty-four hours after an injection, paralysis up to six months after an injection, cancer near the injection site, and diseases such as tuberculosis within twenty years. The speaker also notes that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern of “poisoning the people” in 1796. The transcript emphasizes that vaccination is a big business and claims it is protected by the government. It references 1986 as a key date when vaccination was protected by the government so that people cannot sue. The speaker concludes by asserting that vaccination is the leading cause of death among children under the age of 15. Throughout, the claims are presented as facts or observations within the book and its interpretation, with emphasis on alleged patterns, motivations, and systemic protections surrounding vaccination.

DDT was in widespread use as a pesticide when polio cases were prevalent. DDT is no longer used in America, but it is still used in other countries where polio-like symptoms are common. One of the effects of DDT poisoning is polio-like symptoms, called encephalopathy. Polio was something that was going on in the early part of the twentieth century, and it's widely credited that the polio vaccine is what stopped that. The speaker questions the general narrative that vaccines are an amazing cure. They believe there are other factors, such as hygiene. The book "Dissolving Illusions" is about the origins of vaccines, what vaccines have done to stop disease spread, and the negative side effects. There are side effects to vaccines, and they don't want to advertise those problems. One person was addicted to the COVID vaccine and did seven inoculations. A doctor told a lady in the neighborhood to stop getting boosted, but she wanted to go to LA to get boosted.

The speaker states they would not give their children the measles, mumps vaccine, claiming that measles was only deadly in the early 1900s due to malnutrition. They allege vitamin A is now a cure and that contracting measles can make children healthier, more resistant to diseases like cancer and heart disease. Addressing an incident in Samoa, the speaker denies convincing people to avoid the measles vaccine, asserting a ban was already in place after deaths caused by a bad vaccine imported from Australia. They claim no one died from measles itself, but from the vaccine. The speaker maintains that vaccines cause autism, citing a CDC study that showed an elevated risk of autism in children who received the hepatitis B vaccine. They allege that studies disproving this link were fraudulent, conducted by "biostitutes" paid by the CDC, and that the lead scientist is now a fugitive wanted for embezzlement. The speaker claims there are hundreds of studies linking vaccines to autism and neurological injuries.

In 1936, a doctor from Indiana claimed to have never seen cancer in unvaccinated individuals, sparking interest. Other doctors have also warned that vaccines could act as a time bomb in the body, potentially causing health issues years later like strokes or heart attacks. The vaccine remains in the system indefinitely, seen as a foreign entity within the body.