reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, and information. The plan involves moving populations into city centers and achieving centralized control. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being used to impoverish populations and bring down developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to preserve personal freedom.

It was a true privilege to meet His Holiness, Pope Leo the fourteenth today. The speaker reflects on the significance of this encounter, underscoring how meaningful the conversation felt in the current moment when a large number of lives continue to be lost across various perilous environments. The dialogue focused on shared values and responsibilities, highlighting a commitment to solidarity and the duty to welcome those in need, as well as an urgent obligation to save lives and protect people who are on the move. The discussion explicitly centers on the grave human impact of displacement and risky journeys, noting that losses occur at sea, in the desert, and along migration routes. The speakers stress that addressing these crises requires a collective approach rooted in compassion and courage, with an emphasis on actionable steps to respond to those in need. This emphasis on humanitarian duty is presented as a guiding principle for policy and practice, encouraging a posture of care and protection for vulnerable individuals who traverse dangerous paths. A key portion of the conversation is devoted to the concept of safe and regular pathways as a means to reduce dangerous journeys. The speakers articulate how establishing predictable, lawful routes can help diminish the risks associated with irregular migration, while also preserving the dignity of migrants. These pathways are described as tools to open up opportunities that support sustainable development, linking the protection of human life to broader social and economic benefits for communities involved in migration flows. Throughout the exchange, there is a continuous reaffirmation that every life lost serves as a powerful reminder to act with both compassion and courage. The tone conveys gravity and determination, urging responsible actors to translate moral imperatives into concrete measures that protect people on the move. By foregrounding solidarity, humane reception, and safe transit options, the conversation with Pope Leo the fourteenth is framed as a call to collective action that aligns humanitarian values with practical strategies for saving lives and promoting dignity and development.

Experts have warned of a coming water crisis, possibly already spurring conflicts due to scarcity. While Earth appears to be a blue planet, 98% of its water is saline, with much of the fresh water locked in glaciers. The available fresh water is unevenly distributed, and reservoirs are being depleted. Big Tech's growing demand for water is exacerbating the problem, though this is intentionally kept secret. The speaker investigated Big Tech's water consumption and its potential disastrous consequences. This video you are watching is brought to you by water. Data centers, which host massive amounts of data, require vast amounts of water for cooling. An average data center consumes up to 5 million gallons of water daily, equivalent to the usage of 50,000 people in an American city.

Whales are washing up on shores, indicating a troubling pattern. The question arises: are windmills or sea floor pounding contributing to this? The North Atlantic right whale is facing extinction with limited habitats available. The U.S. plans to install thousands of wind turbines in areas crucial for marine life, including whale migration and breeding grounds. The increase in whale deaths seems to correlate with activity in these wind lease areas. This situation raises serious concerns about the impact on marine ecosystems.

We lack a common language on water, unlike climate change. Developing this common language is crucial for us to make progress in addressing water-related issues.

The speaker represents civil society and shares a personal passion for the ocean, tracing her fascination from Jacques Cousteau to becoming a deep worker submersible pilot. On a first dive, she saw a plastic hanger at the bottom of the ocean, which steered her toward focusing on the high seas, the 45% of the planet that belongs to everyone as our global commons under UNCLOS. She notes the historical arc from May and Emperor Justinius through the Magna Carta to the Law of the Sea Convention in 1982. The high seas are under peril for many reasons, including the shrinking Arctic ice and the opening of the northern passage, which will require future discussion and focus. Why we should care about the ocean: billions of tons of fish are caught each year, and about a third of the fish harvested are used to feed livestock, such as chickens, making them taste more like fish. She highlights unsustainable fishing practices and the aid of advanced extractive technologies. She references a map of one of the largest fishing nets in the world capable of containing 12 Boeing 747s. The World Bank estimates that poor ocean management leads to approximately $50,000,000,000 in lost revenue annually. She mentions a real example: tuna was sold last year for $1,700,000. She also points to Palau’s policy—closing its waters to shark finning and fin soup—and how it transformed a fin-related value from about $200 per fin into tourism-generated value of about $1,900,000 over their lifetime, a point raised by the President. The Teramar project is introduced to connect people to the global oceans, the high seas, and to make the oceans belong to everyone. It offers a passport, a daily online newspaper, an education platform, a government structure, and a way to connect to oceans as never before. The phrase “Fish do not vote, but we do” emphasizes civic engagement in ocean stewardship. The aim is for every politician to end up with a policy framework and a decision on how they treat the oceans, with the hope that sustainability will be ensured because “without money at the bottom, and without [it] it’s not going to work.” She advocates for the United Nations to lead, calling it the right place with global reach to create a sustainable development goal for the UN, a planetary mandate for the next fifteen years on how we treat our oceans. She urges all people—7,000,000,000 of us—to sign up, obtain a passport, and make our voices heard so that the UN and ambassadors understand what we want, and so that politicians know that “no sustainable ocean means we won’t vote them back into power.”

The speaker raises concerns about the World Health Organization's power to declare and maintain a public health emergency, issue legally binding recommendations, control information, and lack accountability. They argue that without open debate and differing opinions, there can be no science, democracy, legal proceedings, or justice. They emphasize that if one authority has predetermined results, there can be no proper scientific or decision-making process, nor any democracy. The speaker asserts that these issues violate international law and basic principles.

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to establish a totalitarian state with control over land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, information, and human beings worldwide. Contrary to popular belief, Agenda 21 is not about recycling or resource allocation for all. Instead, it focuses on relocating populations to concentrated city centers and achieving centralized control. The plan's three pillars are economy, ecology, and equity, but social equity is used to impoverish large portions of the population and weaken developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and fight for freedom.

The speaker, representing civil society, shares a deep passion for the ocean and highlights a turning point when, during an early dive, a plastic hanger was seen at the bottom, shifting focus to the ocean, particularly the high seas. They emphasize that the high seas represent 45% of the planet and belong to everyone as our global commons under UNCLOS, with assets that belong to all people. Historical context is touched upon, noting a lineage from the Magna Carta through May under Emperor Justinius to the Law of the Sea Convention in 1982, underscoring the enduring importance of the oceans as a shared global resource. A series of urgent concerns about the ocean’s future are raised. The Arctic is melting, shrinking ice opens the northern passage, and this area requires future discussion and focus. The speaker asks why the ocean matters and provides several concrete points: about a million tons of fish are caught each year, and roughly one third of that harvest is used to feed livestock, such as chickens, to make them taste more like fish. They warn that unsustainable fishing practices are prevalent and illustrate the scale of extractive technologies with a map-like image of one of the largest fishing nets capable of containing 12 Boeing 747s. Economic dimensions are highlighted: poor ocean management leads to approximately $50,000,000,000 in lost revenue annually, according to the World Bank. A tuna specimen sold last year is cited at $1,700,000. The speech also references Palau’s ban on shark finning; they note that shark fins were formerly sold for about $200 per fin but that, through tourism generated by preserving sharks, the value rises to about $1,900,000 over Palau’s lifetime. The speaker stresses the need to connect ocean use with people and livelihoods for true sustainability, arguing that money at the bottom supports these efforts. This leads to the creation of the Teramar project, designed to connect everyone to the global oceans: providing a passport, a daily online newspaper, an education platform, a government structure, and a means to connect to the oceans as never before. The underlying message is that people do vote, and if they demand sustainable oceans, politicians should adopt a policy framework and make decisions accordingly so that oceans are treated sustainably. The United Nations is identified as the appropriate leader for a global Sustainable Development Goal to guide ocean stewardship for the next fifteen years, establishing a planetary mandate. The speaker urges all 7,000,000,000 people to sign up, obtain a passport, and make their voices heard so that the UN and ambassadors can hear the public’s demand, and so that politicians understand that “no sustainable ocean means we won’t vote them back into power.”

Ghislaine Maxwell shares her passion for the ocean, sparked by a disappointing submarine dive where she found a plastic hanger instead of marine life. This experience highlighted the urgent need to protect the ocean, which covers 71% of the Earth and is vital for life, producing over half of our oxygen and supporting global trade. Despite its importance, less than 1% of the deep sea has been explored. Current laws allow exploitation of the high seas, threatening marine ecosystems. To address this, she proposes six actions: applying the public trust doctrine, increasing marine protected areas, adopting sustainable revenue models, banning wasteful fishing practices, ensuring sustainable fishing, and building a community to advocate for the ocean. The Terramar project aims to educate and mobilize citizens to protect our global commons for future generations.

Whales are washing up dead, and it's becoming a concerning pattern. The North Atlantic right whale is facing extinction, with limited habitats available. The U.S. plans to install thousands of wind turbines in areas critical for marine life, including where whales migrate and breed. The correlation between the installation of wind turbines and whale deaths is alarming, as indicated by the increasing number of red dots representing these fatalities. This situation raises significant concerns about the impact of wind energy development on marine ecosystems.

Global cooperation and multilateral action are crucial in addressing the matter at hand. It is essential to reach a global agreement on its application. If there is any room for escape, it will undoubtedly be exploited. This highlights the necessity for collective action.

- The speaker found their photo name on the World Economic Forum website under the category “Young Global Leaders,” noting that the list includes people from different political parties worldwide and is described as pushing a super globalist agenda with corporate power among the wealthiest. - It is claimed that even president Putin and others were once “young global leaders,” suggesting the WEF and related networks infiltrate cabinets and governance structures. - The idea is presented that the world oligarchic system holds power in Europe, controlling leaders such as the Bundescanseller (German chancellor) or prime ministers, leading to a perception of a global oligarchy. - The speaker states the Global Shapers community was created as a means to shape the common future, implying an organized effort to influence global policy. - There is a claim that attempts are being made to establish a new world order with rules that supersede and undermine national sovereignty and democracy. - It is argued that UN officials and WEF Davos leaders are in effect the same actors, suggesting the UN is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum in practice. - The claim is made that these elites claim to know what is best for the people, and that billionaires are driving the agenda, with the danger being that they set the world’s rules and pursue a utopian future while silencing the voices and sovereignty of nations. - A sentiment is expressed that the situation is controlled by the same oligarchic ideas and actors, with the response labeled as “Total. 100%.” - Some participants concede debates about a deglobalizing world, but others argue for reglobalization of the world. - It is asserted that the World Economic Forum creates leaders who are then elected by the public, suggesting a pipeline from WEF to political office. - In the United Nations, there is a description of scrutiny for political correctness; those who are not 100% politically correct cannot participate, and influence can be exerted through salary and offers to control individuals. - There is mention of a global rules-based order aimed at combating dangerous extremist views online and minimizing misinformation, framed within shaping a great reset. - The claim is made that nobody will be safe unless everybody is vaccinated, and that there is a need to confront a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of the world. - The discussion concludes with the expectation that the world will look different after this transition process.

The speaker highlights the impact of climate change, which is leading to an increasing number of climate refugees. They express concern about the xenophobia and political authoritarianism that has arisen from the relatively small number of refugees. With the projected number of refugees reaching one billion in this century, the speaker warns that our ability to govern ourselves will be compromised. Urgent action is necessary to address this global challenge.

The UN's 30 by 30 agenda aims to seize 30% of all land and water on Earth, disregarding private property rights. The European Union is implementing it, and California and Joe Biden are using similar language, mentioning conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030. The speaker claims this isn't about conservation but about taking, facilitated in the US by the sustains act, which allows the government to receive private funds for conservation programs. This act assigns value to environmental services provided by privately owned land, such as pollination, photosynthesis, and clean air/water, monetizing them through partnerships between private investors and the government, without landowner consent. The speaker asserts this is a seizing of American assets aligned with the UN's goals, without public consent or input. Representatives, according to the World Economic Forum, are now solely responsible, without needing to consult the public.

The speaker, representing the Sustainable Oceans Alliance, discusses the importance of the ocean and the need for sustainable management. She shares her personal journey of becoming passionate about the ocean and highlights the significance of the high seas, which make up 45% of the planet. Unsustainable fishing practices and poor ocean management result in significant economic losses. The speaker emphasizes the need for a connection between industry, people, and the ocean to achieve sustainability. She introduces the Terramar project, which aims to connect individuals to the global oceans and encourages everyone to sign up and make their voices heard for a sustainable ocean. The speaker concludes by inviting the audience to visit the Terramar project website to join the ocean community.

They express astonishment that Patagonia is being set on fire, and they insist that the fires are intentional. They state with strong certainty that the harmful acts against Patagonia are deliberate, not accidental, and they are clear that certain forces are aligned with these fires. They point to specific interests behind these actions, identifying real estate and mining as key motives for those who would benefit from destabilizing the region. The speakers emphasize that there are powerful factions on one side who stand to gain from a damaged Patagonia. They describe these actors as having significant leverage, with economic stakes in land and mineral extraction, implying that financial and material interests are driving the wrongdoing. The claim is that these interests are not hiding their involvement; rather, they are openly advancing policies or actions that facilitate or excuse the fires, effectively displaying their objectives in plain sight. A central assertion is that the people behind the fires act with brazenness: they “do it in our face” and make no effort to conceal their role. The language conveys a sense of frustration and urgency, underscoring a belief that the perpetrators operate with impunity because they perceive that they have everything in their favor. The phrase suggests a perception that those responsible possess overwhelming influence and resources, rendering resistance or accountability difficult. The speakers convey a sense of solidarity with the affected communities, signaling that the pattern of fires is not random but part of a broader, deliberate strategy. By naming real estate and mining interests, they link environmental destruction to economic and political power, implying that the damage serves the interests of a limited group rather than the public good. The overall message is one of warning: that Patagonia is under threat from organized, resource-driven forces that are embedded in systems of influence and wealth, and that this danger is evident through the conspicuous and unmasked nature of the conduct they describe.

According to the speaker, powerful, wealthy entities influence politicians to create laws that benefit them. Robert Kennedy Junior stated these entities work in coordination to increase authoritarian control, transform people into consumers, shift wealth to the ultra-rich, and exploit the planet. They are allegedly at war with democracy and operate without checks, balances, or legal constraints. The speaker claims there is a secret government operation with more resources than the constitutional government. This operation is described as a criminal enterprise, unsanctioned by the president or Congress, that uses tax dollars to exploit the planet and impoverish populations. The speaker asserts this is the problem that needs to be addressed.