reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Our own people in government, education, media, and councils are working against us, aiming to make us a small, submissive race. Some are evil, some are naive, but together they pose a serious threat. Our children and grandchildren will wonder how we allowed this to happen, all because we feared being called racist. Our government, the European Union, and the United Nations are determined to strip away our country and culture. We must not let ourselves be labeled as racists for wanting to protect our country, culture, and race. They are the true racists. We are proud patriots and must continue fighting until we prevail.

Well, there's free speech, but then there's also hate speech, and woe to those who engage in it because it's a crime. That's a lie, and it's a lie that denies the humanity of the people you're telling it about. And so any attempt to impose hate speech laws in this country, and trust me, there are a lot of people who would like them. There are a lot of people who'd like to codify their own beliefs by punishing those under The US code who disagree with their beliefs. Any attempt to do that is a denial of the humanity of American citizens and cannot be allowed under any circumstances. That's got to be the red line.

I'm feeling great. Why do people always jump to calling you racist when you stand up for America and want to protect our borders? I'm standing here with a black man, he's my brother. How could I be racist? Why are you asking if he's racist just because he's white and standing up for America? Do you like Latin people? Do you like America? Then what's the problem? You should be out here protesting with us. You're asking that question to make him look racist on your program. Ask me if I'm racist. I love America too, and illegal aliens need to be shipped back to their country. How is that racist? You're the racist for even asking that question. You're taking advantage of all the benefits America has to offer, and you ask if he's racist? Shame on you.

The speaker states the book "Racial Understanding" is about the foundations of America being European, and that the country is losing the roots and values it was built upon. He claims that the European Christian foundations of America are under relentless attack, and that Europeans must defend their rights and heritage. He defines European civilization as the way "we" live, the foundation of the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the writings of Shakespeare, the philosophies of Goethe, Solzhenitsyn, Dotezsky, and the music of Wagner and Beethoven. When asked about the similarity between the title of the book, "My Awakening," and "Mein Kampf," the speaker says "My Awakening" is a very generic title.

The speaker challenges the idea of a unified white or European identity, noting that Europeans fought each other in two world wars and that there is no clear boundary of who is 'white' (examples: Italians vs Swedes; Turks in Europe). They warn that any imagined unity would create an Us-versus-them dynamic and inevitable division. They question the existence of a European identity and of whiteness itself, suggesting race is an American concept tied to post-slavery. They point out that Europeans have long histories of war and nationalist ambitions—fascist tendencies, Franco-like rule, a Catholic monarchy, and exclusion of Muslims or evangelicals. They argue those ideas were never American; Europe has been an immigrant country, but some now seek to overturn the constitution and create a fascist dictatorship with a Catholic government, which would be the most anti-American idea they've heard.

Speaker 0 discusses the value of open debate and denouncing tactics used by some to shut down discussion. He references Charlie Kirk’s public life and the speech he asked him to deliver earlier this year, noting that Kirk died for the belief in the importance of debate. He explains that, in the months leading up to his final days, Kirk devoted effort to arguing about the event and the speech, and that he faced immense pressure from donors to remove him from Turning Point’s roster. The speaker asserts that Kirk stood firm in his belief that people should be able to debate, and that if you have something valid to say or are telling the truth, you should be able to explain it calmly and in detail to people who disagree, rather than resorting to silencing or questioning motives. He criticizes the tendency to label questions as indicative of evil or to accuse others of motives, noting how “shut up racist” has become a prevailing, harmful reaction. He states that this phrase was the number one reason he voted for Donald Trump. He emphasizes that if he were a racist or bigot, he would acknowledge it, noting that in America one is allowed to be whatever kind of person one wants, but he is opposed to racism and bigotry. He argues that the style of debate that obstructs the other side from talking by quickly appealing to motive is corrosive, and he questions the usefulness of such questioning practices. The speaker insists he’s grown tired of that approach and believes they’ve reached the end of it. He states clearly that he will not play by those rules, and he will express his views regardless of others’ disapproval, as long as he has the opportunity to speak. He reiterates that if someone doesn’t like his views, that’s fine, but he intends to express them openly. In closing, he reiterates his commitment to speaking his mind and not engaging in the silencing tactics he condemns.

The speakers discuss the origins and identity of the United States. One speaker asserts the country's foundation is rooted in the "European mind" and Western European Christian descent, not any other group. Another speaker questions the concept of a "Chinese mind" and suggests the USA would be different if founded by another group. One speaker believes America's unifying principle is not race or ethnicity, but the doctrine of human rights. Another speaker believes that people inevitably bring their culture with them. They argue that the "Anglo Saxon culture" started the country and that culture and philosophy are inseparable. This speaker identifies with the Western Anglo-Saxon culture and philosophy as the defining characteristic of America, more so than its geography.

The speaker believes America's unifying principle was never race, skin color, or ethnicity, but rather a doctrine of human rights. They state that most other countries are unified by ethnicity or religion. The speaker thinks it is un-American to want to preserve European heritage, but acknowledges that the motivation behind such a desire is key. They state that if the motivation is not bigotry, they can only trust that to be the case, as they cannot look inside another person's soul.

The speaker believes America's unifying principle was never race, skin color, or ethnicity, but rather a doctrine of human rights. They state that most countries are unified by ethnicity or religion, but America was different. The speaker thinks it is un-American to want to preserve European heritage. Whether that desire is moral depends on the motivation behind it. The speaker can only trust that it is not motivated by bigotry, as they cannot look inside another person's soul.

I really pushed hard for this meeting and called a lot of people who know him and were in regular contact with him. I went to see some of those people directly. Please, can you help me get a sit down for five minutes with Benjamin Netanyahu? I probably called or met with six, seven, eight, maybe more people on this question. People in official capacities, people in the Israeli government. I know a number of people in the Israeli government, people in Israel, a friend of mine in California who knows him. I really, really tried. And I did so for two reasons. One, because there was a threat to my family. The Israeli government and Netanyahu himself tried to punish two members of my family. I won’t be more specific, but actually punished two members of my family because he, as he has said in public many times, believes in blood guilt. Amalek, you know, when someone commits a crime against you, you punish not just him, but his family, his bloodline. There’s no idea that’s less Western than that, more anti Christian than that. Christians reject that. Netanyahu doesn’t. That’s why he’s talking about Amalek, and he was going after my family, literally. So I felt very threatened by that. But, moreover, I think it’s bad for my country to have people using that kind of language, round them up, bring them to the camps, gas chambers, Nazis, antisemitism. It scares the heck out of people. It makes people crazy and hysterical. And certainly in my case, none of that is true. I hate collective punishment. I hate attacking people on the basis of their bloodline. I hate antisemitism and anti white racism and all of this or any kind of racism, period. And I’ve said that a lot. So using that kind of language against someone who is not fundamentally your enemy, just, in my case, I want Christians in areas controlled by Israel to be treated with dignity, to have rights. And I don’t want the US government involved in a war, a regime change war with Iran. Those are my priorities and I’ve said them out loud. I have no secret agenda.

The speaker believes America's unifying principle was never race, skin color, or ethnicity, but rather a doctrine of human rights. They state that most countries are unified by ethnicity or religion, while America is different. The speaker thinks it is un-American to want to preserve European heritage, but acknowledges that the motivation behind such a desire is key. They state that if the motivation is not bigotry, they can only trust that to be the case, as they cannot look inside another person's soul.

If you're a decent person, it should be easy to renounce whiteness. I encourage you to renounce your whiteness because it's not right to be white.

The blood in our veins is the same blood that fought at the Alamo and Valley Forge, wrote Shakespeare and Beethoven, invented electricity, and spread Christianity. This blood laid the foundations of our country, and now that heritage is in danger. The enemies of our heritage, the masters of hate, accuse us of hate. But we endure attacks and fight against the media, government, money, and political privilege, not out of hate, but out of deep love.

The media often labels us as part of the Fed to dismiss our ideas without engaging with them. Many conservatives fear being labeled as racist, which is why they use such terms against us. I don’t believe in the term racism; it lacks a solid definition. I advocate for strong immigration restrictions that serve a nation’s interests, as citizenship is a privilege granted by a country. We view the American people as an ethnic group descended from European settlers and promote cultural vitality, especially among young men. Our efforts include community-building and activism. The American identity is rooted in Anglo-Saxon culture, with other European groups assimilating into this core identity over time.

I'm not a traitor, I'm a defender. I want Americans to demand more from their government and society. 30 years ago, things were better. Those calling me a traitor don't prioritize America's interests.

We are at risk of losing our identity due to a lack of diversity. People like you bring change, and that’s why many come here. As more individuals arrive, they will transform the country my ancestors established. It’s natural for me to express concern about this shift.

Excuse me, sorry to interrupt. I'm just trying to talk. What do you want to know? So go. What are you doing here then? It's a white country. Well, you hate white people. He makes you...He hates white people, everybody. This man here, he hates white people. That's what you just said. You say you hate white people. This man just said to me that he hates white people. This man, he says he won't talk to me because I'm white. He hates white people. Just go. No. You go away.

Person 1: I asked to get clarity on the white supremacy concept. I'm half German, half Irish. We’ve talked where nobody believes the holo hoax stuff anymore. The more people read into it with masturbation machines, lampshades, piles of shoes, an honest assessment shows it’s lunacy. But who benefited most from the Holocaust? Jews and world Jewry. But who was the target of Holocaust? Hoaxers. Germany. Germany. White Europeans. No. Germany. So why have Americans been paying so much for Holocaust museums and restitution and memorial councils and support for Israel and for world Jewry? Why are there 700 NGOs for supporting Jews and giving money to Jews, and basically zero to support founding stock white European Americans. Literally zero Jews signed the Declaration of Independence or the constitution, and the constitution and declaration were both overwhelmingly signed by white Europeans. If you want to extend it, like the founding fathers that were Freemasons that were Kabbalist kind of Jews, then that’s not accurate. They weren’t Kabbalists. Freemasonry was created literally in 1843 funded by the Rothschilds for the purposes of subverting Freemasonry and rewriting the narrative around our Freemasonry founding fathers. George Washington, Ben Franklin, James Madison, Van Buren—absolutely correct. Absolutely wrong. If you’re talking about the free Masonic founding fathers, by extension, they’re Kabbalistic Jews anyway. Person 2: Ben Franklin in 1787 … there’s a hierarchy. Crypto Jews, John Kerry Cohen, for instance. He’s a free Masonic Jew as well. Kabbalistic believer and all that stuff. Trump likely is too. He’s a convert. And then you’ve got Freemasons that are secondary because it’s their pathway to be able to become official Shabbos scorer that get to enjoy the perks of all the Jewish crimes that they commit. B’nai B’rith actually did infiltrate the Free Masonic Lodges back in 1843, done by a bunch of German Jews in New York that started the first lodge, then gradually infiltrated the other lodges they didn’t control at that time. B’nai B’rith is actually one of the biggest global movements now; they’ve got over 5,000 of these Masonic houses and schools, etc., that they use for human trafficking. Charlotte, South Carolina is their headquarters. They’re everywhere; you don’t even know where all the homes are because they have so many of them. They’re rival with Khobod Lubovich, another massive movement with many pieces of real estate. They can be probably more powerful than the Vatican combined. I guess they run the Vatican. Person 3: But you understand I’m an anti-supremacist, right? You wanna tell me that you know, the white race, why can’t we have a white country, a white state? No one’s stopping you. Have your white ethnoidentarian state. Nobody cares. When you say they were persecuting the Germans, even after World War II, they killed over 11,000,000. If you believe Theodore Kaufman’s book, Germany must perish. They had Germany on the target list from the early medieval times. Do you recall how many Goy were killed in World War II? It’s like over 80,000,000 or so. They’re mostly whites, British or French, Russians. It’s mainly whites that were killed—Slavs, mainly Slavs. Slavs, but then Brits, French, others, whites were killed too. The point: they want whites fighting amongst each other, brother wars like World War I to wipe each other out and to restrict birth rates by pushing things like LGBTQ, hijacking kids to go through sex changes becoming infertile. It’s the same with the COVID vaccine, leading to sterility and reduced birth rates. So they are looking to kill, gradually reduce the white population. Person 1: Their biggest servants and slaves are white Christians. John Hagee, they’re a problem. I condemn them as well; they’re part of the problem. Since 1909, with the Schofield Bible, they’ve subverted Christians who would have viewed the Bible differently. The facts are the facts. We’re just slaves, manipulated. Take care of your own, don’t tell me you want a white utopia when you’re slaves, soldiers and slaves of Jewry. Albert, with what how the Jews have taken over with their institutions, their control of…

Speaker 0: The speech opens with a critique of denouncing and a reference to the red guard/ c ultural revolution, questioning why nobody denounces others the way that era was denounced. The speaker recalls that the entire point of Charlie Kirk’s public life was to have actual debate, and asserts that Charlie “died for it.” The last several months of Charlie’s life were devoted, in part, to arguing about this event and this speech, which he asked the speaker to deliver earlier this year, this summer. The speaker notes that Charlie faced immense pressure from people who fund Turning Point who wanted him to remove the speaker from the roster. This has all become public, and the speaker describes the situation as sad, stating that Charlie stood firm in his often stated and deeply held belief that people should be able to debate. The speaker emphasizes that if someone has something valid to say and is telling the truth, they ought to be able to explain it calmly and in detail to people who don’t agree with them, and that they shouldn’t immediately resort to “shut up racist.” The speaker adds that “shut up racist” is the number one reason they voted for Donald Trump. They declare that if they were a racist or a bigot, they would simply say so, noting that it’s America and one is allowed to be whatever kind of person they want. They insist they are not a racist and have always opposed-bigoted views, but criticize the style of debate that prevents the other side from talking or being heard by immediately going to motive, asking why the question is asked, and stating they detect “a certain evil in your soul” in the question. They say that listening to such a question implicates the listeners too, and that someday they may be asked to denounce that person; they assert that friendship is not a reason to defend someone and that love is no defense. The speaker reflects that they thought that phase had ended and that they are not going to engage in those rules. They affirm that if someone doesn’t like what they think, that’s fine as long as they get to express it. That remains their view.

Why does every other group in the world have the right to its own homeland except white people? Explain how that makes sense. Either no group has the right, or every group does. Why are we playing along with this nonsense? It's leading to a bad conclusion. Either every group has a right to self-determination, or no group does. It can't be some groups do, or all groups do but one. It's all or nothing. What's the counter-argument? There is no answer. Uniformity is maintained through threats, like, "Shut up. You're a bad person for saying that. You're a Nazi." No. I hate the Nazis and attacking people for what they can't control, like how they're born. I'm a Christian, and I don't believe in it. Call me whatever you want. I'm making the opposite case. I've done nothing to be ashamed of. If defending people from being murdered because of how they were born is a crime, then I'll plead guilty.

I question whether integration was the right move, separating it from issues like oppression and racism. Finland's homogeneity allows for a unified sense of direction and understanding among its people. In any group, shared cultural understanding creates implicit trust. For example, when I am in a room full of Black people, there is an implicit trust. I'm curious if integration was the correct solution in America, especially considering the civil rights movement. I disagree with the premise that integration was the right solution. Segregation and integration are not the only two options. Integration may seem more progressive than segregation, however we are being integrated into a supremacist culture that feeds off hierarchy, insecurity, and anxiety. Why would we want to be a part of that?

Speaker 0: You consider the Jewish people members of the white race? Yes. I do. Of course. Do you have any platform against them as Hitler did? Not all of them. Against those of them who are mixed up with communism or who are trying to subvert The United States for the purposes of Zionism and Israel. I I have something against them. What will be the topic of your talk tonight? Mainly the fact that the the fact that communism and race mixing are Jewish operations are suppressed in the press. You can't get that information out.

Living in a country you support is important. Some Americans hate their country but benefit from it. It's easy to criticize systems like capitalism or support ideologies like Islam when not living in those environments. The US has attracted immigrants for its freedom, not because it's a white supremacist nation. If freedom is lost, the US may resemble countries with oppressive governments.

I don't have a culture? No, we're white, we don't have a culture.