reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 presents evidence of alleged corruption by Joe Biden, including questionable finances and overseas payments. The firing of a prosecutor investigating Biden's son is highlighted as suspicious. Speaker 0 questions the motives behind the impeachment inquiry, suggesting it may be politically motivated. Speaker 1 argues that the evidence points to corruption and influence peddling, not political revenge. The lack of media coverage is blamed for public skepticism.

Speaker 0: President Biden lied to the American people, his family profited through shell companies, and his Federal agencies are obstructing the congressional inquiry. There are numerous scandals and corruption cases that have been uncovered. President Biden claimed he never discussed his son's business dealings, but evidence shows otherwise. He had dinner with Russian and Kazakhstani oligarchs, spoke with Hunter's associates over 20 times, and met with a Chinese energy company while Hunter worked for them. A text message from Hunter implies a commitment not fulfilled. A confidential source alleged a $5 million bribe to President Biden. The House Oversight Committee investigation found that Hunter flew on air force 2 at least 15 times to enrich the Biden family. This impeachment inquiry will give House Investigators more subpoena authority to gather evidence from uncooperative federal agencies. The New York Post's report on Hunter Biden's laptop was falsely labeled as Russian disinformation. Social media banned the story, but it was later revealed to be legitimate. A court opinion confirmed that the White House and federal agencies were censoring conservative speech on social media platforms.

Speaker 0 is asked if President Biden accepted bribes and if he would comment on the arrest of the former president.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about investigating allegations, but Speaker 1 avoids commenting. Speaker 0 expresses concern on behalf of millions of Americans and criticizes Senate Democrats and the media for not addressing the evidence. Speaker 0 asks if the informant who accused Joe Biden of taking a bribe was previously relied upon by the FBI, but Speaker 1 evades a direct answer. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of refusing to answer and calls it disgraceful.

Hunter Biden's alleged involvement in making pornography was brought up during a discussion. The speaker questioned whether it was appropriate to display such content. The chairperson interrupted, stating that the speaker's time had expired. Another person was offered the remaining time to speak.

Speaker 0 claims to have evidence that could lead to the imprisonment or impeachment of someone. They mention a grand jury and a special prosecutor. Speaker 1 suggests that Joe Biden's motive for going to Ukraine was not to fight corruption, but rather to assist the natural gas industry. They mention that Biden's son was involved with a major Ukrainian natural gas company.

Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of discrediting herself by focusing on trivial matters concerning Biden, such as his ice cream preference, instead of investigating Hunter Biden's alleged financial dealings with foreign entities. Speaker 1 claims Hunter Biden received millions from Moscow and significant payments from an energy company despite lacking relevant experience. Speaker 0 states that the Hunter Biden laptop story originated from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani and cannot be verified. Speaker 1 insists the laptop's existence is known and that it's crucial to investigate potential corruption involving Biden and foreign money from China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 also alleges Biden's brother profited in Iraq without prior experience. Speaker 1 asserts this is a major scandal that Speaker 0 is ignoring. Speaker 0 reiterates the laptop cannot be verified.

Speaker 0 expresses a preference for kids over adults. Speaker 1 mentions being given permission to touch someone. Speaker 2 discusses allegations of inappropriate behavior by Joe Biden towards his daughter and women. Speaker 3 accuses the Bidens of child pornography. Speaker 4 mentions instances of Biden touching girls' hair. Speaker 5 discusses suspicions of Hunter Biden's involvement in human trafficking. Speaker 6 asks for evidence of this claim. Speaker 7 alleges that Hunter Biden was involved in a prostitution ring. Speaker 8 mentions accusations of inappropriate touching against Joe Biden. Speaker 9 shares accounts of two women feeling uncomfortable due to Biden's actions. Speaker 1 mentions Biden giving his phone number to kids with stutters. Speaker 3 concludes that this behavior is inappropriate.

The speaker challenges the idea that Hunter Biden committed a crime, stating it's not illegal to profit from one's last name. They then direct Chuck to the Marco Polo report, which they claim details potential crimes.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

Speaker 0 denies any knowledge or discussion about his business or his family's business with his son or anyone else. Speaker 1 reveals that Stephanie, who was vice president, approved a response to a 2015 story about Hunter Biden's connection to Burisma Energy Company. It is also mentioned that Biden's family received less than $1,000,000 from a Chinese firm.

The speaker makes derogatory remarks about the Biden family, accusing them of accepting money from China, engaging in illicit activities, and being involved in corrupt practices. The speaker specifically targets Hunter Biden, calling him a sleazebag who took bribes and filmed explicit content. The transcript ends abruptly after summarizing these allegations.

Speaker 1 denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings and claims to have never discussed anything related to Ukraine. He also states that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business. Speaker 1 dismisses claims that he was on speaker phone discussing business matters and points out that he was aware of his son's business but never talked about it. Speaker 2 admits to having shell companies that collected money through tax fraud, and compares it to what he sees happening with Biden. Speaker 1 emphasizes that there is no evidence to support any wrongdoing.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of discrediting themselves by avoiding questions about Biden's son and alleged corruption. Speaker 1 questions the validity of the Hunter Biden laptop story, sourced from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. Speaker 0 insists it's a crucial issue to investigate Biden's alleged corruption involving China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 argues the story lacks verification. Speaker 0 counters by pointing out the laptop's existence and the Biden family's response. The conversation escalates as Speaker 0 emphasizes the significance of the scandal and Speaker 1 questions its validity.

The speaker discusses the analogy of a criminal ordering a hit and how it relates to the impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden. They claim that Joe Biden was involved in his family's business schemes in Romania while he was president. They mention that Biden delivered an anti-corruption speech in Romania and had discussions with the Romanian president about anti-corruption efforts. They also highlight that the Biden family received money from a corrupt Romanian oligarch through a company called Bladen Enterprises. They mention Hunter Biden's meetings with the US ambassador to Romania and the flow of over $1,000,000 to the Bidens.

The president's statements contradict the fact that he has spoken to Hunter Biden's business associates. However, Speaker 1 argues that the president never claimed to have never spoken to anyone. He simply stated that he had no involvement in Hunter Biden's business dealings. Speaker 1 finds it unreasonable to expect a father not to greet people his son is dining with. This is the only evidence presented. Additionally, it is mentioned that Hunter Biden used this as a party trick to impress others.

Speaker 0 asks Biden about the allegations of illegal or unethical behavior regarding his family's business interests in Ukraine and China. Speaker 1 denies the claims, calling them lies. Speaker 0 mentions the lawsuits, but Speaker 1 again denies any interaction.

Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian energy company while his father, Joe Biden, was Vice President is questioned. Joe Biden claims he didn't know what his son was doing and only found out after he joined the board. He trusts his son and sees no reason to investigate further. The interviewer suggests that as Vice President, Joe Biden should have been more aware of his family's activities, but Joe Biden dismisses the idea. He deflects by mentioning the issues surrounding Trump's family. Joe Biden believes there is no evidence to suggest any wrongdoing on his son's part.

The speaker discusses the potential crimes committed by the Bidens in relation to their dealings with China. They mention that the Bidens could be charged as unregistered foreign agents, potentially involved in bribery, wire fraud, money laundering, and racketeering. The speaker finds it insulting that these actions have not been reported. They believe that Joe Biden's involvement borders on treason and that he has not been honest about his family's financial dealings. The ongoing investigation aims to uncover the truth and reveal Joe Biden's role in receiving the money. The speaker concludes that Joe's claim of having no knowledge is a blatant lie.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of selling access to the president through his son's job at a gas company. Speaker 1 denies the claim and challenges Speaker 0 to do physical activities together. Speaker 1 defends his son, stating that no one has accused him of wrongdoing. Speaker 0 mentions hearing the accusation on MSNBC, but Speaker 1 disputes this. Speaker 1 criticizes Speaker 0's lack of backbone. Speaker 2 comments on Speaker 1's defensive and angry response, claiming that it reveals the real Joe Biden. Speaker 2 asserts that Joe Biden sent his son to peddle influence overseas, and when confronted, Joe Biden denies it, claiming that the mainstream media has not reported it.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about his son's involvement in a Ukrainian energy company facing corruption charges. Speaker 1 claims to have no knowledge of his son's activities and trusts him. Speaker 0 questions the lack of accountability, but Speaker 1 deflects by mentioning Trump's family. Speaker 1 denies any wrongdoing and states that there is no evidence against his son. When asked about guardrails if elected, Speaker 1 asserts that his relatives will not engage in foreign business due to the current administration's controversies. No foreign business dealings will occur.

Speaker 0 asks if Joe Biden received payments from Burisma or any other foreign companies while he was vice president, president, or a private citizen. Speaker 1 mentions an ongoing investigation led by the US attorney in Delaware, appointed by President Trump. Speaker 1 suggests referring to the US attorney for any information that can be shared. Speaker 0 then asks if the president is under investigation, to which Speaker 1 refuses to confirm or deny, following department policy. The conversation ends without a clear answer regarding Biden's involvement with foreign payments or the president's investigation.

The speaker expresses willingness to testify against Joe Biden, claiming to have weeks' worth of tapes. They mention the existence of incriminating pictures involving underage girls. Another speaker mentions that they have come across 80,000 images and videos, many of which were of young girls. They discuss the potential evidence of Joe Biden's involvement in his son's foreign dealings, including a conversation where Joe demonstrates knowledge of Chinese transactions. The speaker believes that those criticizing Biden are unaware of the full extent of the evidence, including Joe's awareness of his son's dangerous behavior towards children.

Speaker 1 states that the Biden family engaged in influence peddling, resulting in tens of millions of dollars. He claims his legitimate businesses became illegitimate through alignment with Hunter Biden, which involved selling the "Biden name." Speaker 1 alleges that Joe Biden was aware and involved, citing his participation in at least two business phone calls. He asserts that Joe Biden's claim of never discussing foreign business deals with his son or brother is a lie, supported by documents and evidence. Speaker 1 further alleges that Joe Biden negotiated with the Chinese Communist Party on a golf course to secure a board seat and receive money from the Chinese. He references a WhatsApp message and a billion dollars in Ukraine, conditioned on removing a prosecutor investigating Hunter.

The speaker mentions that a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversations with them. There are 17 recordings in total, with 15 being phone calls between the foreign national and Hunter Biden, and 2 being phone calls between the foreign national and then vice president Joe Biden. These recordings were kept as an insurance policy by the foreign national. It is suggested that Joe Biden may have been involved in employing Hunter Biden. The speaker questions why the Justice Department and FBI haven't focused on the Biden family like they did with former president Trump. The relevance of these recordings to a bribery scheme is highlighted.