reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There was no pandemic; data shows all-cause mortality did not rise before the WHO's declaration. The real public health emergency stemmed from government actions. Inappropriate PCR tests misled people into thinking they had a specific disease, while harmful medical procedures led to unnecessary deaths in hospitals and care homes. Many were denied life-saving antibiotics, resulting in bacterial pneumonia deaths. The claim of a pandemic justified rushed vaccine development, which is impossible within the stated timeframe. Manufacturing complex biological products typically takes years, and what was administered was likely a toxic substance. This narrative allowed for mass vaccinations, with millions reportedly dying as a result.

There are two patterns we need to examine: vaccine-related deaths and hospital-related deaths. Hospital homicides may, unfortunately, be greater. Acute renal failure, or sudden kidney failure, seems to be occurring mostly in hospitals and has increased since the CMS NCTAP program, which is a payout program for remdesivir, began. This also involves a greater NIH protocol that includes ventilators. In 2020, there was a signal of acute renal failure; people were put on ventilators and developed lung infections. The government is not examining the data, but over 153,000 excess people have died in the last three years from acute renal failure alone, which is much younger than typical COVID deaths. Doctors were coerced by medical boards and organizations to use these protocols, or they would risk losing their licenses. I believe some people knew exactly what they were doing regarding these hospital protocols. More than half a million people have been killed by hospital protocols and another half a million by the vaccines.

Around 6,000 additional deaths have been estimated due to administering two doses of Rivotril to elderly individuals in order to facilitate their death. These deaths occurred in nursing homes over a certain period of time. It was decided, without prior statistics, that these individuals had incurable conditions and would not recover, so they were assisted towards death. In the Paris region, rapid intervention measures were implemented to administer Rivotril to elderly individuals suspected of suffering from Covid-19. This decision resulted in a significant increase in mortality, particularly among the elderly in nursing homes. This decision-making process is considered a scandal.

According to the speaker, the all-cause mortality data contradicts the idea of a viral respiratory pandemic. They argue that spikes in mortality during the COVID period were due to assaults on vulnerable people through medical treatment. Different jurisdictions had different methods of assault, such as overusing HCQ or using ventilators. They claim that more than half the countries in the world had no excess mortality until the vaccines were rolled out, which resulted in a surge of deaths. Even in India, there was no excess mortality until the vaccines were introduced, causing a significant increase in deaths.

In this video, the speaker discusses their conclusions on all-cause mortality and the pandemic. They claim that if governments had not taken any extraordinary measures, there would have been no excess mortality beyond the usual trend. They argue that the measures implemented by governments caused varying levels of excess mortality in different jurisdictions. Additionally, they assert that the COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself resulted in excess mortality, with different doses and age groups being associated with peaks in deaths. The speaker promises to provide specific numbers in their presentation.

The speaker believes that the combination of a respiratory illness and fear induced by the media led to unnecessary deaths in Italy, the US, and the UK. They claim that patients were put on inappropriate doses of sedatives and antiviral drugs, leading to fatalities. The speaker, with a background in respiratory illnesses, concludes that the excessive deaths in care homes were a result of deliberate actions by the state.

There was no pandemic, as all-cause mortality data did not increase, and the WHO fraudulently declared one. An inappropriate PCR test was used, giving the false impression of a novel disease. People were mistreated via mass ventilation, sedatives and respiratory depressants in care homes, and denial of antibiotics, leading to deaths from bacterial pneumonia. Since there was no pandemic, experimental medical interventions were unnecessary. It is impossible to rapidly invent, test, and manufacture a complex biomedical product; the fastest record was six years. What was done was the advancement of intentionally toxic materials, rushed and injected into people, resulting in millions of deaths. The lie of a pandemic was maintained to inject billions with an intentionally dangerous substance, resulting in 17 million deaths so far.

The speaker discusses all-cause mortality and presents data from various countries, including France, the USA, and Romania. They highlight the seasonal pattern of mortality, with higher deaths in the winter and lower deaths in the summer. The speaker questions the understanding of this pattern and argues that it is not fully comprehended. They also analyze historical events such as the Spanish flu, the Great Depression, and wars, showing their impact on mortality rates. The speaker then focuses on the COVID-19 pandemic, discussing the effects of aggressive medical treatments, socioeconomic factors, and vaccines on mortality. They present data suggesting that vaccines may have caused excess deaths, particularly among the elderly.

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

During the pandemic, fear and politics took over, leading to social distancing and mask mandates. The predictions of physicist Niall Ferguson and Imperial College London were highly exaggerated and flawed. Elderly individuals were hit the hardest, with many dying in care homes due to the use of the sedative midazolam. The government implemented policies to protect the NHS, but it was actually a cover for a euthanasia program. Face masks were ineffective against the virus, as admitted by experts like Dr. Fauci. The pandemic was a behavioral experiment to manipulate and control people's behavior.

In hospitals, a drug called midazolam, previously used for euthanasia and lethal injections, is now being used to induce a comatose state in patients. Shockingly, it has also been administered to elderly individuals in UK care centers, with their deaths being attributed to COVID-19. It is important to note that midazolam is known to be lethal. This information has been observed in medical reports.

Many people who died with a COVID diagnosis were already in a fragile state, where even a minor infection could be fatal. However, it is questionable whether these infections should be considered the cause of death. For example, if we started registering every urinary tract infection that pushed a frail person over the edge, we would have an epidemic of urinary tract infections. The same kind of illogical attribution happened with COVID, where 3,000 expected deaths in hospices were attributed to the virus. This raises the question of what a death certificate should actually indicate: the specific cause of death on a particular day, or the overall cause of death within a certain timeframe.

Governments worldwide intentionally suppressed early treatment for COVID-19, causing fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death. This controversial narrative aimed to harm citizens simultaneously. Disturbingly, doctors in the Netherlands admitted to euthanizing seniors with lethal doses of morphine instead of treating the virus. Similar occurrences were reported in Africa and South America. The bizarre behavior observed globally during the pandemic was not limited to the United States.

Thousands of people have allegedly been euthanized secretly to inflate COVID-19 statistics. The report suggests that elderly individuals were given a fatal injection of midazolam, causing their deaths to be falsely attributed to COVID-19. The data, obtained by Australian politician Craig Kelly, indicates a significant number of elderly people were murdered using this end-of-life drug. The report implicates global leaders such as Boris Johnson, Justin Trudeau, and Donald Trump in implementing hospital death protocols that boosted mortality rates. The information was made public by the national director of the United Australia Party.

You want me to elevate your head? This is what we had to do when the vaccines rolled out, and there's a lot of death being covered up. The COVID case fatality rate is calculated as deaths divided by cases. It should decrease with an effective vaccine, but in Santa Clara County, California, and nationwide, it actually increased by 2.6. This means your risk of dying from COVID went up. Our public health department refuses to comment.

Speaker 0: The problem they have, like I say, or had, is that they weren't getting enough deaths to really find the population. So they needed a lot of people to die very quickly in the 2020. So what they did in Britain, they did it in other countries too, but I can talk about the British example, is we had a health secretary at the time called Matt Hancock, and he oversaw the ordering, not least two years supply from France, of an end of life drug called midazolam, which is used in by a number of American states in the execution process. It's a sedative, and if you give too much of it, you kill people, and I've seen documented evidence. We've done a documentary about it on Iconic. I've seen documented evidence given to me that shows that the levels of midazolam that were given to people were lethal and would have been known to be lethal. And another effect of midazolam, ironically, is that it suppresses respiration and respiratory, the respiratory process. So if you take midazolam, you start to have breathing problems. And the more midazolam they give you, the more breathing problems you have until it kills you. And these connection to the breathing problems and the suppression of respiration is actually in the regulations of midazolam use. It's all there to be seen. So in Britain, you had this massive, massive delivery of midazolam in the 2020, and they used midazolam in the preparation for operations, but they stopped operations except the most emergency. So all that midazolam that would have been used in operations was now not being used in operations. Suddenly, in the same period, April 2020, the midazolam use went through the fricking roof way beyond anything that's been used before. And this is what they've done, and they did it in America, and they did it in other countries. They said to the hospitals in Britain, this is through Hancock and those that control him, it's the porn, a psychopathic porn, yes, but a porn. We've got to clear the beds for this big influx of COVID people that's coming in this pandemic, which never actually came. That's why you saw all these nurses on TikTok doing their dancing in empty hospitals, nobody bloody there. So we've got to get clear the beds. So what the hospitals did, they did this in America. Mhmm. The same thing happened there with another drug, and they they they put them into the care homes. And if you're in a hospital and you're elderly, your health is in serious trouble. But they put these very seriously ill people into care homes, and they fed them midazolam. At the same time they fed them midazolam, they were putting do not resuscitate orders on them, not only on the elderly, but on people with learning difficulties, people with psychological problems, just like the Nazis. And these people were dying in droves. What will happen is thousands and thousands and thousands of old people in Britain died in this very same period from midazolam. And they said they died of COVID nineteen because it was their respiratory thing that did that did for them. Right? Well, that was caused by the midazolam, you psychopath. And what did they call that? Thousands of people dying. The first wave of COVID, because they didn't have a virus, so they had to make it seem as if they did. In America, they used a drug called Remdesivir that was mandated for use on so called COVID patients. They tested positive with a test not tested with the virus by the psychopath, Antti DiFauci. And what remdesivir does is it stops the kidneys function, stops other organs function, but it stops the kidneys function, it's infamous for it. And so what happens is the abdominal cavity started filling up with water of people, and their lungs filled up with water, and they literally drowned. And they called this the first wave of COVID in America. This is how it was done.

A patient who looked like he was dying was given morphine despite having zero pain, according to the pain score. Insulin was also administered even though his glucose was fine, and he died three minutes later. The speaker reported this case to the medical board after reviewing the chart, but they did nothing. The speaker states that this definitely went on during COVID. The speaker refers to this as euthanasia, though it is not called that. The speaker offered to send the record that was reviewed.

Speaker 0 argues against the flu shot, citing Cochrane and BMJ. He says: people who take the flu shot are protected against the at strain of flu, but they’re four point four times more likely to get a non flu infection. He contends that after vaccination you might get sick, not from flu but from something indistinguishable from flu, because the flu shot gives you pathogenic priming that injures your immune system and makes you more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. He references a Pentagon story, citing Wolfe (January), stating the flu shot not only primes for flu but primes for coronavirus. In the study, they had a placebo group and a vaccine group to test prophylaxis against coronavirus for military readiness, and they found people who got the flu shot were thirty six percent more likely to get coronavirus. He claims this is not an isolated finding, saying six other major studies report the same thing. Regarding longevity, he references Cochrane’s point about what has happened to longevity in the elderly since flu shot mandates began for elderly people, saying life expectancy has dramatically gone down as the flu shot proliferation increased. He adds an observational note about the COVID vaccine period: “during the COVID crisis” there’s no science on this, but observationally, it tended to be people who got their flu shots—nursing home residents who receive flu shots and first responders who get flu shots are implicated. Speaker 1 interruptions: asks for clarification, saying, “with all due respect, I don’t understand the implications of your position. If you’re right, why wouldn’t it follow that the flu shot should be illegal? You said it’s criminal.” Speaker 0 responds with a partial cut-off fragment, beginning to reply with “to” and then stopping.

According to the English public health agency, vaccinated individuals have a higher chance of dying from Covid. Unfortunately, in France, access to this data is restricted. Scientific evidence shows that these vaccines do not work and actually lead to increased mortality and fertility issues. There is also a rise in cancer cases. Mainstream media ignores these facts and instead focuses on a new variant to push for a flu Covid vaccination campaign. The elderly, who are known to have adverse reactions to experimental inoculations, are being targeted. It is clear that those promoting these campaigns have lost all reason. Lockdowns and general population mask-wearing have been proven ineffective. The number of deaths worldwide is significant and cannot be hidden. Funeral directors can attest to the increase in young deaths.

There was no pandemic. The all-cause mortality data did not increase before the WHO's fraudulent declaration. The PCR test was inappropriately used, creating a false impression of a specific disease. People were mistreated via mass ventilation, sedatives and respiratory depressants in care homes, and denial of antibiotics. Based on this lie, we were told vaccines would save us, but there was no pandemic, so no rushed intervention was needed. It's impossible to invent, test, and manufacture a complex biomedical product so quickly. What was done was the advancement of intentionally toxic materials, sketchily advanced and injected into people, with millions dead as a result. The lie of a pandemic was maintained to inject five and a half billion people with a dangerous substance, resulting in seventeen million deaths so far.

According to Dennis Rancourt's data, there was no increase in all-cause mortality leading up to the WHO's declaration of a pandemic. The use of fraudulent PCR tests created a false impression of a specific disease. Inappropriately treating people in hospitals, such as mass ventilation, resulted in numerous deaths. Additionally, the denial of life-saving antibiotics and treatment for bacterial pneumonia in the community worsened the situation. This is the only pandemic that exists.

The speaker warns against manipulating patients and emphasizes the importance of safe vaccines. They mention having written a book advocating for safe vaccines and criticize the government's stance on vaccination. The speaker shares a personal experience of being vaccinated and still contracting COVID-19, highlighting the need for revaccination. They accuse big pharmaceutical companies of manipulating the population and influencing politicians. The speaker refers to a book that challenges official COVID-19 statistics and argues that the increase in deaths is due to age rather than the disease itself. They also mention cases of medical abuse and negligence in hospitals. The speaker estimates around 160,000 deaths in France, attributing them to pre-existing conditions and lack of treatment.

We never talk about euthanasia, but rather about shortening life expectancy. At the time of these injections, which coincided with the decree, we see an increase in deaths among the elderly in nursing homes. This increase is followed by a decrease in mortality, suggesting that those classified as Covid-19 patients received palliative care and would have died within three weeks. This is not the effect of Covid, but of Rivotrism. By June, there is no excess mortality in France. The so-called first wave can be fully explained by administrative decisions and choices made, without even needing to consider the virus.

Governments implemented measures during the pandemic that can be seen as assaults, resulting in excess mortality in various jurisdictions. The impact varied, with some places experiencing significant deaths while others had fewer. Additionally, the COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself led to excess mortality. This was evident in the peaks of deaths directly linked to different vaccine rollouts for various age groups and in different regions. The connection between the vaccines and deaths is undeniable, as there is clear evidence of the vaccines causing a significant number of fatalities.

After the initial promises of vaccination leading to regained freedoms, it has become clear that these claims are false. We are not free, nor are we protected, and the vaccine does not protect others. The only remaining argument is that the vaccine supposedly protects against severe forms of the virus. However, this claim is just as false as the others. The statistics presented to us categorize individuals as unvaccinated until fifteen days after the second dose, conveniently ignoring the high number of deaths that occur after the first dose. In countries with high vaccination rates, such as Israel, the number of deaths doubled in the two months following the injections. Very few countries have published data differentiating between those who have received zero doses and those who have received one, two, or three doses. Israel is one such country, and when comparing the mortality rates of the truly unvaccinated to those who have received one, two, or three doses, it becomes clear that the unvaccinated have a lower mortality rate and less severe forms of the virus. I urge all doctors not to believe in this new fantasy.