TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The CIA had plans to kidnap and assassinate me inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London. They authorized targeting my European colleagues, subjecting us to theft, hacking, and misinformation. My wife and infant son were also targeted, with a CIA asset assigned to track my wife and instructions to obtain my son's DNA. I was convicted by a foreign power for requesting, receiving, and publishing truthful information while in Europe. Criminalizing news gathering threatens investigative journalism. Journalists shouldn't be prosecuted for doing their jobs; journalism is not a crime but a pillar of a free society.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

A person accuses Mike Pompeo of covering up the US government's role in a president's murder. Pompeo allegedly pressured Trump to keep documents secret. Pompeo's employees claimed he planned to kill Julian Assange as CIA director. The speaker believes Pompeo is a criminal for these actions.

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) may be the new central intelligence agency. USAID and the State Department are complicit in election fraud and child trafficking. They orchestrate coups in Guatemala, interfere in elections, and attempt to assassinate the attorney general. DHS and HHS collude with Mexican cartels and NGOs to traffic children internationally, covering it up with fraudulent elections. Over 452,000 migrant children have been trafficked to the US, with 340,000 missing. Children are given to unvetted sponsors, including gang members and sex offenders, with little to no oversight. The goal is to make people aware and expose what these evil people are doing. Dios nos ha dado la fuerza, la sabiduría y la voluntad para lograrlo.

Speaker 1 claims MK Ultra caused suicides and that CIA shrinks were used on operations, including one where a man's arm was hypnotized in the air for two hours. The CIA, post-9/11, shifted from intelligence gathering to a paramilitary organization focused on high-tech surveillance rather than recruiting spies. Speaker 1 was approached by an FBI agent posing as a Japanese diplomat attempting to elicit espionage. Speaker 1 went to jail for revealing in an ABC interview that the CIA had a torture program, authorized by the president, who then lied about it. No torturers were prosecuted. After Obama's election, John Brennan allegedly reopened the case against Speaker 1 due to personal animosity, seeking an espionage charge, despite lacking evidence. The FBI then tried to set up Speaker 1 to commit espionage. Speaker 1 believes the CIA uses psychological profiling on presidents, manipulating them. Congress is now cheerleaders for intelligence agencies instead of providing oversight. The CIA is forbidden from spying on American citizens, but NSA leaked Speaker 1's information to the New York Times. Torture doesn't work, and the CIA used techniques that led to deaths. Speaker 1 was charged with espionage, making a false statement, and violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act. The speaker took a plea deal to avoid a longer sentence. The CIA objected to Speaker 1's placement in a minimum-security prison. The speaker believes elements of the CIA were responsible for JFK's assassination. The speaker also claims mind control is not science fiction and that the CIA talked about infecting people with cancer.

The United States government decides to send the CIA to Venezuela. They say the CIA will conduct operations against Venezuela, against the peace of Venezuela. This is claimed to be unprecedented; the speaker notes that never before has any government since the CIA’s existence publicly said it would order the CIA to kill, to derange, and to topple countries. A historian named Alejandro is invoked to support this claim. The speaker lists past Latin American coups, asserting that all involved the CIA and resulted in governments being overthrown and presidents assassinated, with documents allegedly published by the U.S. government that have since been declassified. Specific examples named are: 1974, Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz; 1965, Dominican Republic, Juan Bosch; 1964, Brazil, Joao Goulart; 1973, Chile, Salvador Allende. The speaker says these are “a few” among many coups in Latin America, all documented through declassified U.S. government documents. Additionally, the case of Mosaddegh in Iran (1952) is cited as another example of a national leader toppled. The speaker asserts that, over time, the CIA apologized for overthrowing these presidents, stating the pretenses were that they were communists or terrorists, but later acknowledging the deception. The speaker uses the term “immorality” to describe those past actions and contrasts them with the present claim, stating that for the first time in history, a U.S. government says it has given authorization and issued orders to attack a country. The speaker concludes with a call to the Venezuelan people, saying their people are clear, united, highly conscious, with “1000000 of eyes and 1000000 of ears,” and that they possess the means to defeat this “open conspiracy” against the peace and stability of Venezuela. The ultimate aim asserted is to restore the peace and stability to which the people of Venezuela have a right, and to ensure they regain and sustain that peace and stability.

Speaker 0 states that sources claim Brennan used "reverse targeting" to entrap Trump advisors Carter Page and George Papadopoulos via Halper and Mifsud. Papadopoulos told former Australian ambassador Downer about Russian offers to help Trump. This appears to be how Russiagate started. Speaker 1 believes John Brennan is a dark figure. Speaker 1 was arrested in 2012 and charged with espionage for blowing the whistle on the sea ice torch program. Speaker 1 claims to have found memos where Brennan told Holder to charge him with espionage, even though Holder's people didn't think he committed it, and then to make him defend himself. The espionage charges were dropped after Speaker 1 went bankrupt from legal fees. Speaker 1 believes Brennan was responsible for the origin of Russiagate. Speaker 1 claims the FBI isn't capable of such operations, but the CIA and John Brennan are. Speaker 1 claims Brennan and his contemporaries devise operations to get from point A to point C, ruining people along the way, and discusses potential tactics.

Speaker 0: Did you hear Trump's take on the JFK assassination, why he didn't release the files? Yeah. I know what Trump's take is. He said that if you knew what I know, you wouldn't tell people either, which is crazy. Well, and What does that mean? That's his position on the UAP thing as well Yeah. Actually. And that's a lot of people's position on it. I mean, you know, Trump is saying, of course, the CIA had knowledge of it. That is known. I mean, I mean, the whole it sounds like it's so funny. There's so many levels and there's so much I don't understand. But the whole JFK conspiracy industry, and it really is an industry, more books written on that than almost any historical topic, is is filled with wackos. Right? There are a lot of wackos in there. But it obscures that fact obscures the larger fact which is the facts themselves tell an unbelievable story. Yeah. And so whatever. I could get into it at great length. But yeah. Yeah. They're they're still classifying documents sixty one years later. Both Trump and Joe Biden have, in violation of my read of federal law, kept those documents secret. There's no living person connected to the Kennedy assassination. It was a couple generations ago. There's no one person whose whose secrets are being protected. It's an institution or maybe countries. There may have been countries involved too. I mean, don't know the answer, but there's clearly something worth protecting. And I know that when I I spoke to someone who'd seen the documents, okay, two years ago and I got I got one fact out of him, which is, yes, the CIA was involved. And by CIA, CIA is a huge organization, but James Jesus Angleton, the head of the operations directorate, had knowledge of this, which I think is well known. But that that's the view of someone who saw the documents. So I thought that was news, so I went on TV and said that. The next day, I'll never forget it, I went quail hunting, and I was driving back and I got a phone call from Mike Pompeo's lawyer. Mike Pompeo was the Secretary of State, but before then he was the Director of the CIA. And in that position, he plotted the murder of Julian Assange, so he is a criminal as far as I'm concerned. But his lawyer called me and said, you know, you should know that anyone who tells you the contents of classified documents has committed a crime. He's threatening me. It's in my car. I'll never with my dog sitting next to me. I'll never forget this. And I said, are you really saying that to reveal that the US government had a role in the murder of a democratically elected president to say that out loud, that's the crime? What about the actual crime which is murdering a president? Like, you're covering up for that, Mike Pompeo. He had no no response at all. And so Mike Pompeo is the one who pressed Trump to keep those documents secret. And so it's like, what's crazy to me is not just that Pompeo did that. I think Pompeo was a really sinister person and a and a criminal. I think that. I think that because the facts suggest that. He was caught. Yahoo News, Mike Issachoff wrote a long piece on this several years ago. His employees went to Mike Issachoff and said, hey. Mike Pompeo was plotting to murder Julian Assange who's never even been charged with a crime in The United States as CIA director. That's illegal. You're not allowed federal employees are not allowed to just kill people they don't like. Okay? Just to set the baseline here. So that's who Mike Pompeo is, but he somehow intimidated Trump into not releasing this. Well, okay. That's all bad. Right? I think it's criminal behavior. What's crazy is how Mike Pompeo is treated. He's treated as like a republican pooh bah in good standing. He fully expects to become the secretary of defense in a Trump administration, which is like completely insane. Why would you get criminal and give him nuclear weapons? Okay. That's my view. I think it's a common sense view. And like he goes to fundraisers and dinners and everyone's like, hey, Mike Pompeo. It's like, no. You're the guy who kept information the public has right to know secret. You're the guy who plotted the murder of someone who committed no crime. You are the outlaw. You are the bad guy. But no. He's treated as like, you know, like a pillar of republican Washington. I think that's I think it's mind bending to watch that.

The CIA developed plans to kidnap and assassinate me inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London. They authorized targeting my European colleagues with theft, hacking, and disinformation. My wife and infant son were also targeted, with a CIA asset assigned to track my wife and instructions to obtain DNA from my six-month-old son's nappy. I was convicted by a foreign power for requesting, receiving, and publishing truthful information about that power while in Europe. The criminalization of news gathering threatens investigative journalism everywhere. Journalists shouldn't be prosecuted for doing their jobs because journalism is not a crime; it's essential for a free and informed society.

In March 2017, WikiLeaks exposed CIA spying on French political parties, French and German leaders, the European Central Bank, European Economics Ministries, and French industry. WikiLeaks also revealed the CIA's malware and virus production, supply chain subversion, and subversion of antivirus software, cars, smart TVs, and iPhones. CIA Director Pompeo then launched a campaign of retribution, allegedly drawing up plans to kidnap and assassinate Julian Assange within the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Pompeo also authorized going after Assange's European colleagues, subjecting them to theft, hacking attacks, and the planting of false information. Assange's wife and infant son were also targeted, with a CIA asset assigned to track his wife and instructions given to obtain DNA from his 6-month-old son's nappy. This information comes from the testimony of over 30 current and former US intelligence officials and corroborated by records seized in a prosecution against CIA agents involved.

The speaker asserts that discussions of child abuse and child trafficking are avoided in the UK Parliament, implying that avoidance signals a problem. They claim there is no separate crime of satanic child abuse in the UK; they say it’s simply child abuse, and suggest that the Netherlands similarly erases the subject. The speaker relates local discoveries in Leicester, described as the nearest city to their area, where they found extensive child abuse linked to both historic and current politicians and to the police. They state they gave evidence against the head of police about “industrial child trafficking.” A central claim is that there is industrial-scale trafficking of children from Ukraine via Moldova to the UK for sexual abuse and organ harvesting. The speaker says this information came from two Ukrainian secret service agents who independently reported the same scheme, without knowing each other. They alleged that Ukrainian secret services collected children during the conflict in the Donbas and handed them over to UK secret services. The two informants reportedly named individuals and were appalled by the task of collecting children for trafficking. The speaker recounts that one whistleblower was killed in a cafe when a bomb was placed under his table, and the second survived a car bombing after being warned by a car park camera clip showing the explosion as he approached his car. They claim the whistleblowers named people very close to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his regime, asserting that those individuals purportedly benefit financially from the war by enabling child trafficking. Further claims include that there is more money in child trafficking and sex trafficking than in drugs or weapons because of the trafficked children’s organs. The speaker contends that the trafficking scheme involves selling the children multiple times, and that victims disappear after organs are harvested, which is why victims are not found in the end. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the alleged connection between wartime activity, Ukrainian whistleblowers, assassination attempts, and a broader network that allegedly profits from child trafficking and organ harvesting.

Kevin Shipp, a former CIA officer with seventeen years of service, recounts a sweeping, real-world portrait of MKUltra, directed-energy weapons, and a long-running program of secrecy and retaliation at the highest levels of the U.S. intelligence community. He describes how the CIA and a “shadow government” targeted him and his family after he investigated a serious vulnerability in U.S. embassies—namely, foreign nationals in visa sections could hack an unclassified computer to identify CIA cover officers and assets. When he alerted CIA management, a division chief warned him to drop the matter, and his report was allegedly deleted. State Department IG later corroborated the risk to agents and rebuked the CIA; Shipp says this encounter left a laser-like targeting on his back. Following these events, Shipp says he and his family were transferred to a secret U.S. base where they were given a house known to be contaminated. Within months, severe illness struck: his children’s throats swelled, headaches surged, and his wife developed dementia. He asserts the house contained black mold and leakage of mica toxin (a chemical weapon Saddam Hussein used, described as yellow rain). With the aid of an attorney, Shipp reported the mold and toxins and sought redress, obtaining a clearance for his attorney to work with CI documents. He alleges that, after he filed a personal injury suit against the rental company, the couple faced intensified retaliation: surveillance, bugging, and a wave of neurological symptoms across the family—severe headaches, insomnia, nosebleeds, and immune and neurological damage. He asserts his oldest son’s immune system was severely compromised and that the boy’s symptoms resembled AIDS or radiation exposure; the son later developed PTSD and deteriorated mentally, leading to concerns about his whereabouts in Florida. Shipp asserts that senior CIA and Department of State officials attempted to silence him, including an IG officer who later confessed that George Tenet and a senior CIA official (Buzzy Cronk-gard) were ordered to silence and destroy him to prevent public disclosure. He describes a culture of intimidation, including a rise in the escalation of surveillance and obstruction of access to credit and resources. He recounts a “secret base” where additional disturbing occurrences were reported, including an observed figure described by guards as a goat-headed, cloaked figure (Baphomet) witnessed by multiple witnesses, including the base commander’s son. Shipp asks whether this symbol signals demonic activity or a psyop and notes that the accounts were later corroborated in mainstream outlets as to the base’s existence. On MKUltra itself, Shipp defines it as a practice that used drugs (LSD, mescaline, etc.) without participants’ knowledge to monitor brain activity and to create programmable “born” super-soldiers or data mules who would forget the information they carried. He claims the program included sexual abuse, sleep deprivation, beatings, hypnosis, and other forms of torture to break and reprogram minds. He cites Victor Marchetti’s assertion that MKUltra did not end in 1973 and mentions Elizabeth Nichol-son’s studies asserting continuing existence. He argues that the Church Committee inquiry led to the destruction of thousands of documents and suppression of testimony, preventing reform. He cites Sirhan Sirhan as a potential later MKUltra subject and notes Carol Warner’s work with patients who had MKUltra exposure. Shipp connects these activities to broader patterns of power and secrecy: mass mind control through contractors (Lockheed Martin, SAIC, Booz Allen Hamilton) who hold CIA clearances, and a culture where tens of thousands of Americans are bound by secrecy agreements that preclude speaking out. He claims Lockheed Martin monitors mail and has access to the U.S. Post Office, suggesting pervasive surveillance and control. He connects Venezuela’s use of directed-energy weapons to the broader capabilities of the CIA and other national actors, arguing that these technologies go back twenty years or more and have spread to Russia, China, and elsewhere. He contends that Havana syndrome and related phenomena are related modalities and suggests the CIA’s upper echelons do not share the full truth with Congress, recalling Chuck Schumer’s warning about “six ways from Sunday” to retaliate if you cross the intelligence community. He argues for reform: dismantling or reforming the CIA and moving intelligence functions to accountable bodies so that oversight becomes feasible again. Throughout, Shipp emphasizes the human cost: his wife and children still suffer PTSD and neurological damage, his son remains missing, and he himself continues to face pressure and retaliation. He frames his narrative as a call to expose the abuses of secrecy, advocate for accountability, and awaken the public to the alleged realities of MKUltra-era and post-era mind-control capabilities.

Speaker discusses Trump’s stance on JFK assassination files, saying Trump claimed that if you knew what I know, you wouldn’t tell people either, and notes that this is his position on UAP as well. He asserts that the CIA had knowledge of the JFK matter and that the conspiracy industry around JFK is an industry with many wackos, but emphasizes that the facts themselves tell an unbelievable story. He mentions that documents are still classified sixty-one years later and argues that both Trump and Joe Biden have kept those documents secret in violation of his reading of federal law. He states there is no living person connected to the Kennedy assassination, only an institution or possibly countries involved, and indicates there may be something worth protecting. He relays a conversation with someone who had seen the documents two years earlier, from whom he learned that yes, the CIA was involved, and notes James Jesus Angleton, head of the operations directorate, had knowledge of this. He says this was news to him and he discussed it on TV. The next day, while quail hunting, he received a phone call from Mike Pompeo’s lawyer, who, as then-CIA director and later Secretary of State, had plotted the murder of Julian Assange. The lawyer told him that anyone who reveals contents of classified documents has committed a crime, and the speaker recalls driving with his dog and asks if revealing that the U.S. government had a role in the murder of a democratically elected president constitutes the crime, while suggesting Pompeo is protecting the murder. The speaker says Pompeo had no response. The speaker asserts Pompeo pressed Trump to keep the documents secret and calls Pompeo sinister and criminal, citing that Pompeo was caught—referencing Yahoo News, Mike Issachoff’s piece—where Issachoff’s sources claimed Pompeo was plotting to murder Julian Assange, who had not been charged in the U.S. as CIA director. He states federal employees are not allowed to kill people they don’t like. He contends Pompeo pressured Trump to withhold information the public has a right to know and that Pompeo plotted the murder of someone who committed no crime. Finally, the speaker questions how Pompeo is treated in Republican Washington, noting he is treated as a respected figure and potential secretary of defense in a Trump administration, despite being described as criminal for keeping information secret and for plotting a murder. He finds it mind-bending that Pompeo is treated as a pillar of Republican Washington.

The CIA developed plans to kidnap and assassinate me inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London. They authorized attacks on my European colleagues, including theft, hacking, and disinformation. My wife and infant son were also targeted. A CIA asset was assigned to track my wife, and there were instructions to get DNA from my six-month-old son's nappy. I was convicted by a foreign power for requesting, receiving, and publishing truthful information about that power while in Europe. Criminalizing news gathering threatens investigative journalism everywhere. Journalists shouldn't be prosecuted for doing their jobs. Journalism is not a crime; it's essential for a free and informed society.

Speaker 0 asks about how common it is for the CIA to use drugs as a weapon or to create cartels for various purposes, and whether it sometimes works as a strategy. Speaker 1 responds that it continues to this day, with key US allies implicated in the drug trade. The Organization for Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, funded by the State Department, is described as an investigative journalist outlet that has a new report about the Noboa family’s ties to the Balkan mafia. The Noboa family controls Ecuador; Daniel Noboa, born in Miami, is the president, and his family owns a Noboa shipping company. The shipping company is alleged to have been involved in sending bananas through the Noboa Bonita Fruit Company packed with cocaine to Europe via routes overseen by the Balkan Mafia. Ecuador is described as the largest drug export center to the United States, per the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, while Venezuela is claimed to be responsible for about 5% of drug transit. Kristi Noem, identified as the DHS secretary, is said to have visited Ecuador to meet with Daniel Noboa and campaign for a referendum to bring US military bases back to Ecuador, a referendum that was rejected by Ecuadorians. Noboa is portrayed as strategically valuable to the US, described as friendly with Marco Rubio, who has touted him as a partner in the war on drugs, yet the claim is made that the issue is about geostrategic interests. Noboa is said to have ended the legacy of social democrat Rafael Correa and is purportedly supporting US military bases on Ecuadorian soil, aligning with US interests even as Ecuador becomes a center of narco-trafficking and cartels destabilize parts of the country. In Mexico, the narrative references Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderón, noting Calderón as author of Plan Mérida, a US military-directed program to combat drugs in Mexico. Gennaro García Luna, head of Mexico’s equivalent of the FBI, is described as now in a US federal prison for life for involvement in a conspiracy with the Sinaloa cartel to ship drugs to the United States. The State Department is said to have acknowledged knowing about Luna’s activities while valuing him as a political partner. The Fast and Furious program is mentioned, alleging that the US armed Mexican cartels to track guns, and a 2011 federal court testimony by a Chapo Guzmán lieutenant claimed the US armed the Sinaloa cartel to defeat rivals like the Guadalajara cartel. A recent raid in Oakton, Northern Virginia, on Paul Campo, former director of the DEA’s financial division, is described. Campo was in charge of money laundering investigations and was associated with a CIA asset named Robert Sensi to launder $12,000,000 for the Jalisco New Generation Cartel. The speaker notes ongoing exploration of these connections. Historically, the CIA is said to have worked with narco cartels to fund black operations, funding proxy wars in Central America with off-the-books money. The Guadalajara cartel allegedly funded the Nicaraguan Contras through cartel profits. Enrique “Kiki” Camarena, a DEA agent, reportedly discovered the Guadalajara cartel’s involvement in black operations and was captured and tortured, with alleged monitoring by CIA operatives including Felix Rodríguez, who supervised the capture of Che Guevara. This is tied to a documentary on Amazon called The Last NARC.

Speaker 0: The speaker alleges a cover-up by people including Bill Barr and Mike Pompeo. Bill Barr, described by Jeffrey Epstein as “CIA,” allegedly covered up Epstein’s murder in federal detention, with Barr saying publicly, “we gotta make sure everyone thinks this is a suicide.” The speaker asks why Barr isn’t being questioned about this. Mike Pompeo is accused of plotting to murder Julian Assange, head of WikiLeaks. The speaker notes that WikiLeaks released the first tranche of emails to the public, and that Assange suggested on Dutch TV that his source was Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who was found murdered in Washington in what was described as a robbery where nothing was taken. Assange hinted in the interview that his sources faced great risks, mentioning Seth Rich; the interviewer pressed whether Rich was murdered for the leaks, and Assange said he couldn’t reveal sources but that they faced risks. Shortly after, Assange was incarcerated, first in an embassy in London and then in Belmarsh Prison, without criminal charges, actions the speaker attributes to the CIA and Mike Pompeo. The speaker contends that someone should ask Pompeo about this. Speaker 1: The speaker expresses anger at what they see as broad, systemic cover-ups versus ordinary Americans facing jail for minor offenses. They reference Pizzagate and Epstein, asserting that cover-ups extend across other issues, including Benghazi and Hillary Clinton material, which they claim were never properly pursued with the appropriate parties. They point to a long list of alleged co-conspirators connected to the Epstein matter, including those revealed in a recent document drop and corroborated subsequently. The list reportedly includes ten co-conspirators: one named Leslie Wexner, pilots (three identified by name), and others such as Ghislain Maxwell and various assistants who recruited girls, as well as individuals trafficking models. The speaker asserts there were many people around Epstein who were deeply involved and deserve serious questioning. They also reference Ehud Barak as among those connected to the network. Overall: The conversation presents multiple allegations of high-level complicity and cover-ups involving Bill Barr, Mike Pompeo, Julian Assange, Seth Rich, and a broad network around Jeffrey Epstein, including named and unnamed individuals, with claims of documented co-conspirators and ongoing questions about accountability.

The speaker claims the CIA produces vast amounts of malware and viruses, subverts supply chains and antivirus software, and targets cars, smart TVs, and iPhones. After this reveal, CIA Director Pompeo allegedly launched a campaign of retribution. The speaker states that under Pompeo's direction, the CIA planned to kidnap and assassinate him within the Ecuadorian Embassy in London and targeted his European colleagues with theft, hacking attacks, and false information. His wife and infant son were also allegedly targeted, with a CIA asset assigned to track his wife and instructions given to obtain DNA from his 6-month-old son's diaper. The speaker asserts this information comes from over 30 current and former U.S. Intelligence officials speaking to the U.S. Press, corroborated by records seized in a prosecution against CIA agents. The speaker believes the CIA's actions provide insight into transnational repression, made uniquely visible due to whistleblowers and judicial investigations in Spain.

Speaker accuses Mike Pompeo of covering up US government involvement in a president's murder and plotting to kill Julian Assange. Pompeo pressured Trump to keep documents secret. Pompeo's employees reported his illegal actions to a journalist. Pompeo's behavior is deemed criminal.

Assange has been held in a UK prison without being charged with a crime. The US government wants to indict him, and the British government agreed to keep him in isolation until it's resolved. Before being charged in the US, the CIA director, Mike Pompeo, discussed assassinating Assange. This raises concerns about federal appointees using taxpayer money to murder someone who embarrassed them. Pompeo, however, remains free and even visits donors. It's disturbing that our government would use our money to kill someone who exposed their crimes, and no one seems to have a problem with it. This led the speaker to visit Assange, which turned out to be worse than expected.

A person accuses Mike Pompeo of covering up the US government's role in a president's murder. Pompeo allegedly pushed Trump to keep documents secret and was accused of plotting to kill Julian Assange. The speaker believes Pompeo is a criminal for his actions.

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, became a target for the US government after embarrassing them with leaked classified information. The CIA considered various plans to capture or kill him, including kidnapping him from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where he was hiding. The embassy, unbeknownst to Assange, had been spying on him for US intelligence. Assange released Vault 7, exposing the CIA's hacking division and tactics, which infuriated the agency. He was eventually arrested, charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, and faces a potential 170 years in prison. Assange's fate remains uncertain.

I went quail hunting and received a call from Mike Pompeo's lawyer, who warned me that discussing classified documents is a crime. I challenged him, asking if revealing the U.S. government's role in the murder of a democratically elected president was the real crime, rather than the murder itself. Pompeo, as CIA director, allegedly plotted to kill Julian Assange, who hasn't been charged with any crime. Despite this, Pompeo is treated as a respected figure in Republican circles and is expected to become secretary of defense in a Trump administration. It's shocking that someone involved in such serious misconduct is celebrated rather than held accountable.

According to the speaker, Gina Haspel, as CIA station chief in England in 2016, authorized intelligence operations related to Russiagate. The speaker claims that Haspel is a leading architect of Russiagate who has remained behind the scenes. They allege that Haspel's authorization was necessary for US FBI and IC officials, and possibly other intelligence allies, to conduct bumping operations in England. The speaker also asserts that Haspel blocked the release of a report on John Brennan's ICA (Intelligence Community Assessment) regarding Russian interference in the US elections. This report, created by Devin Nunez and others, supposedly detailed the corruption involved in the ICA's creation. Despite requests for its declassification, Haspel, along with others, allegedly used national security concerns to keep it secret, effectively covering up their own corruption. The speaker believes the report's release is crucial to exposing the extent of IC involvement and corruption.

The speaker claims that USAID and the CIA helped orchestrate Trump's impeachment. According to the speaker, the House of Representatives impeached President Trump in December 2019 based on a memo written by a CIA analyst held over from the Obama administration. The memo relied heavily on a report by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an organization initially funded by USAID. The speaker alleges that USAID was involved in regime change abroad and, like censorship tools used abroad, helped create a predicate for Trump's impeachment. The speaker suggests this is one of many revelations to come.

CIA Director Pompeo directed plans to kidnap and assassinate me while I was in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. This included targeting my family, with a CIA asset assigned to track my wife and obtain DNA from my infant son. More than 30 U.S. intelligence officials have corroborated this. My freedom today is not due to a functioning system but because I pleaded guilty to journalism. The prosecution of me highlights the dangers facing journalists and the chilling effect on freedom of expression. The U.S. government has claimed that only its citizens have free speech rights, setting a dangerous precedent for targeting journalists globally. We must protect the rights of journalists and ensure that what happened to me does not happen to others. The fight for fundamental liberties is crucial, as the repression of one can lead to the repression of all. Thank you for your support in this ongoing struggle.