TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We saw a man crawling on a roof with a rifle while Trump was speaking. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. Eventually, the man was shot by the Secret Service. The speaker is certain the shots came from the man on the roof.

The speaker believes there was a coordinated effort by law enforcement to allow Trump supporters into the Capitol. They mention police officers changing into Trump supporter attire, suggesting FBI involvement. The speaker emphasizes the need for someone familiar with the Capitol to lead the group. They claim Trump supporters inside the Capitol before doors opened were working with FBI agents embedded in the crowd for months. The speaker insists on revealing the truth to the American people. Translation: The speaker suggests a conspiracy involving law enforcement and FBI agents to allow Trump supporters into the Capitol, with some officers changing attire. They stress the importance of insider knowledge to guide the group and claim that embedded FBI agents coordinated with Trump supporters. The speaker is determined to uncover the truth for the American people.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss an incident where a person named Ray Epps repeatedly urged them and others to go into the capital building. Speaker 1 recalls encountering Epps on January 5th during a protest outside BLM Plaza. Epps followed Speaker 1 and began instructing the crowd, famously saying they should go into the capital the next day. Speaker 0 also expresses readiness to go into the capital. Speaker 1 questions whether Epps was part of a scripted plan or an undercover agent inciting violence. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 emphasizing the need to go to the capital where their problems lie.

The conversation centers on a set of claims and observations about January 6 that orbit around Sedition Hunters, Ray Epps, and the so-called “Northwest Scaffold Commander.” The speakers discuss and link multiple pieces of information to argue that the FBI and other agencies were paying close attention to, or coordinating with, covert actor networks on that day. - The discussion opens with a reference to a John Solomon article about Sedition Hunters and claims that the FBI and Justice Department paid Sedition Hunters about $150,000 to gather evidence on January 6 protesters to help the FBI make arrests. They note the figure was reported as over $100,000 in some places and $150,000 in a House hearing, and they say the FBI/DOJ paid Sedition Hunters, the SPLC, the ADL, the Atlantic Council, DFR Lab, and Bellingcat for intelligence. - The main focus shifts to a piece titled Meet Ray Epps (December 2021) by the speakers’ interlocutor, where they argue that the “main star of the show” was not Ray Epps, but a different figure labeled Northwest Scaffold Commander (referred to as Scaffold Commander). They emphasize that Sedition Hunters’ archives identified Scaffold Commander as their number-one suspect, although he was not placed on the FBI’s most-wanted list. - They recount how, on January 8, 2021, the FBI’s most-wanted list listed Ray Epps as a top suspect in the case, with public calls for information and a cash reward. By late June 2021, a Phoenix newspaper identified him as “Reyes,” and on July 1, 2021, the FBI removed Epps from the wanted list with no explanation and no arrest. They contrast this with Scaffold Commander, who was never added to the FBI’s public wanted list for identification by the public, despite being the focal point of Sedition Hunters’ investigations. - The speakers describe Scaffold Commander as an older man with glasses, a nerdy mask, and a blue cap, who allegedly directed the breach from the Northwest scaffold overlooking the Capitol. They claim he used a bullhorn to issue commands for approximately 18 minutes to an hour and a half, from 1:00 PM to about 2:30 PM, urging the crowd with phrases like “Move forward,” “Don’t just stand there,” “Help somebody over the wall,” and “We gotta fill up the capital.” - They juxtapose these observations with the chronology of the breach: the first breach around 12:53 PM, the crowd’s advance toward the Capitol, and the moment rioters entered the building. They argue Scaffold Commander acted as a ringleader and that Ray Epps was directly beneath him in the crowd, effectively functioning as an internal participant who helped draw people toward the front. - A key point they stress is that Scaffold Commander’s high perch and commanding role align with a long-cited CIA manual from 1983, Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare, which describes a small cadre of crowd agitators operating from elevated positions to direct slogans and crowd movement. They quote and reference passages describing an “outside commando element” that stays above the crowd to observe and direct a demonstration, using high observation points to shout instructions and guide the crowd’s actions. - The speakers argue that the FBI has not acknowledged Scaffold Commander, has not included him on any public list, and has not publicly solicited identification for him, despite Sedition Hunters’ focus on him as the pivotal organizer. They suggest that internal FBI records, memos, or emails about Scaffold Commander could be highly revealing, potentially showing whether higher-ups instructed not to pursue him. - They conclude by urging the FBI and related investigators to search their internal records for “Northwest Scaffold Commander” and make any relevant documents public, implying that such records could undermine the official narrative of the event. They also frame the existence of an internal, externally guided command structure as a critical piece of the January 6 story that remains underexplored by authorities.

Some individuals had planned to storm the Capitol as part of their agenda. Although I hesitate to mention it, as it could lead to my arrest, we must take action. We need to enter the Capitol. Let's proceed.

Speaker 0 expresses intent to storm the Capitol. Speaker 1 discusses Reyes' actions before the Capitol breach. The mob storms the Capitol. Questions arise about Reyes' involvement in inciting the violence. No clear answers are given.

He leaned in and whispered, "We're here to serve the capital," before the events of January 6th unfolded. This moment raised questions about Reyes, especially after he reportedly said to "storm the capital." Investigators analyzed audio and video to confirm the accuracy of his words, which had not been altered. Despite extensive research through various sources, including footage and FBI documents, there was little discussion about Reyes' statements. On January 6th, he directed people toward the Capitol but did not enter himself. He has not publicly clarified his comments or intentions regarding the Capitol. The lack of attention to Reyes' story remains puzzling.

At the Trump rally, two individuals with megaphones repeatedly announced that they would be storming the Capitol at 1 o'clock. They continued this for hours while walking around. Near the rally, officers were stationed outside buildings as a show of force and to monitor the crowd's movement towards the Capitol. A little girl, accompanied by two individuals wearing Antifa attire and Trump gear, also walked along Constitution Avenue for over three hours, proclaiming the same message. It is evident that the Capitol Police were aware of the sentiment and advertising calling for the storming of the Capitol at 1 pm, although the actual storming occurred at 1:03 pm.

The speaker believes the events at the Capitol on January 6th were a setup, pointing to men dressed as Trump supporters inside the building before doors were opened. They question if there were confidential human sources involved. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and denies having such sources present. Additionally, they mention police officers seen changing attire from uniform to Trump supporter clothing.

The speaker reveals that during conference calls before the Capitol attack, no one discussed the intelligence regarding the storming of the Capitol or the potential harm to members of Congress and police officers. They mention a call on January 5th with law enforcement leaders, including the FBI and National Guard, where no one mentioned any concerns about the attack or threats. Other police chiefs, like Robert Conte, also claim they were unaware of the threats. The speaker highlights reports of emails and memos sent to the FBI and FBI director, Steve D'Antuano, predicting violence, yet nothing was mentioned during their video call. The lack of communication and awareness is perplexing.

We had full cooperation from the Capitol Police and the speaker's office, but we couldn't show that FBI agents were present in the crowd, which the FBI has admitted. Ray Epps was not a civilian; he encouraged violence, yet the January 6th committee defended him. There were clear signs of federal involvement, like individuals with earpieces breaking things and then fleeing. I didn't want to wrongly label anyone as an agent without proof. The recent Proud Boys trial revealed an FBI agent lied and hid evidence. We need crowdsourcing for the footage, which should be public. The narrative around January 6th has been misrepresented; it was a violent political demonstration, not a deadly insurrection. Intelligence about the event was withheld from Capitol Police, suggesting a deliberate attempt to create chaos for political gain.

The FBI had significant involvement in the events of January 6, with over 200 agents embedded within the crowd, including inside the Capitol, disguised as Trump supporters. They infiltrated online chat groups and social media platforms discussing opposition to COVID measures. Analysis of communications within these groups reveals that suggestions for potential violence or an occupation of the Capitol originated from these FBI agents. This indicates that the FBI's involvement extended well beyond January 6, influencing events in the preceding weeks and months. Additionally, recently released footage shows Capitol Police welcoming people into the Capitol, contradicting the initial narrative of an insurrection.

Lee planned to storm the US Capitol on January 6th after practicing at other state capitals. He claimed to be a Trump supporter but later criticized Trump. The "Stop the Steal" movement aimed to demonize the enemy. There were discussions about Trump's decisions and strategies, including potential surveillance tactics. Some believed Trump was strategic and ahead of others, while others tried to manipulate him into signing martial law. The overall tone was one of suspicion and intrigue surrounding political motivations and actions. Translation: Lee planned to storm the US Capitol on January 6th after practicing at other state capitals. He claimed to be a Trump supporter but later criticized Trump. The "Stop the Steal" movement aimed to demonize the enemy. There were discussions about Trump's decisions and strategies, including potential surveillance tactics. Some believed Trump was strategic and ahead of others, while others tried to manipulate him into signing martial law. The overall tone was one of suspicion and intrigue surrounding political motivations and actions.

"He is calling for going into the capital the evening before January 6." "And this isn't just a one off, someone some crazy who comes and goes. No." "He goes repeatedly to group after group, redirecting them saying, we need to go into the capital." "on January 6, it's a veritable, where's Waldo? He's everywhere." "twenty seconds before the very first breach of the capital, this individual Ray Epps whispers into someone's ear," "So he's everywhere." "But what it did do is said that Ray Epps was acting alone." "the FBI scrubbed Epps's face from their database, from their public database, just a day after Revolver ran a report on his fellow oath keeper, Stuart Rhodes, who is also unindicted."

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

My neighbor whispered something secretly to me, saying we were not there to fight but to serve the capital. He encouraged me to have a good night and stay safe outside. This moment revealed that Raheps knew about storming the capital before it happened.

While I was pretrial in DC after January 6, I was denied access to evidence initially. Eventually, I gained access to evidence.com, which provided me with more information than most, including lawyers. After securing my bond, I retrieved evidence that supports the claim that President Trump is correct: Nancy Pelosi is directly responsible for the events of January 6. This is not just a conspiracy theory; it’s a fact. I can prove Pelosi's involvement. More details will follow.

Buses filled with FBI informants, disguised as Trump supporters, were deployed to the Capitol on January 6th. The speaker warns that those responsible for this act will face consequences in the future.

Speaker 0: "What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents. There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm. You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen." Speaker 1: "I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens. You die or your informant." Speaker 1: "Put that aside. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time." Speaker 1: "The reason she said I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russergate with Christopher Steelehauper and everybody else. It's the same narrative, and and I'm telling you they were there." Speaker 0: "You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes Yeah. And that would compromise whatever their operation was. Exactly."

Peter Ticton, a former courtroom trial lawyer and founder of the Law Group, reveals that he has access to video evidence of government employees planning the events of January 6th. These employees, who were not identified, were collaborating on Zoom meetings to orchestrate the takeover of the building. Ticton emphasizes that January 6th was not a spontaneous event but rather a premeditated plan. He does not disclose the specific identities of these government employees but asserts that they were not FBI agents or politicians.

Some individuals had planned to storm the Capitol, and tomorrow they intended to carry out their plan. Although I hesitate to mention it, as it could lead to my arrest, I will say it anyway. We must enter the Capitol. Let's go.

The FBI had over 200 agents embedded in the crowd on January 6th, some even posing as Trump supporters. They infiltrated online groups discussing COVID restrictions, leading discussions of violence. Capitol Police were seen welcoming people into the Capitol, contradicting the insurrection narrative.

In the video, the speaker mentions various pieces of intelligence that were not included in assessments regarding the Capitol attack. These include plans to harm palace guards, use chemicals at entry points, burn down the Supreme Court, attack members of Congress, and storm the building. The speaker's intelligence unit even released documents indicating a low probability of civil disobedience. Speaker 1 suggests that certain agencies may have allowed the chaos at the Capitol to serve their political purposes and prevented the speaker from stopping it.

That one moment changed what we knew about Ray Epps that night when he whispered storm the capital before it had happened and echoed the official narrative before it was broadcast across the nation. Of supporters of president Trump stormed The US Capitol Building. We ran it through forensic software that technical investigators use for analyzing audio and video to make sure we heard correctly, and it had not been altered. Epps, who continued to direct people to the capital in the cold light of day on January 6, did not go into the capital himself, according to the January 6 committee and the FBI. He's never explained publicly why he said storm the capital, what he meant by that, or what he may have known. So why hasn't it been addressed? Nobody cared about the Ray Epp story.

During the Capitol incident, a law enforcement officer recounts being attacked and called a traitor. Another person claims that the officer was actually an FBI plant, not in uniform, and carrying a Confederate flag. They believe the narrative is unraveling and demand the release of FBI files to reveal the true culprits.