reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Last week, Kash Patel was confirmed as FBI director, and now Dan Bongino, a right-wing conspiracy theorist, has been appointed as his number two. Bongino has zero experience at the FBI, which is unprecedented for a deputy director. This position has access to sensitive operations, including surveillance and collaboration with allied intelligence agencies. Bongino is known for pushing conspiracy theories, spreading COVID disinformation, and denying Russian interference. He's likely to focus on political payback rather than priorities like stopping fentanyl traffickers, murderers, and violent criminals. As Bongino himself said, "I don't want to move on."

Alarm is rising among Justice Department and FBI officials over potential revenge prosecutions from the incoming Trump administration. Some civil servants have sought legal counsel due to concerns about lengthy and costly legal battles. The selection of Matt Gaetz has intensified these fears. While officials anticipated congressional investigations, Gaetz's appointment surprised many at the DOJ. He lacks prosecutorial experience but is a staunch Trump loyalist, which raises concerns about possible criminal investigations against career DOJ and FBI officials. His appointment is viewed as a way for Trump to protect Gaetz amid ongoing ethics investigations, further escalating anxiety within the department.

The discussion centers on whether a deep state or nefarious forces are maneuvering against President Trump, and whether Trump is being restricted by a gatekeeping inner circle that blocks information. Laura Logan is cited as saying, based on her sources in the intel community, that Trump is being set up to fail and there will be no coming back if he doesn’t act, a claim they discuss with urgency and detail. Key points raised: - There is a concern about how information reaches Trump, with examples cited such as the New York Times reporting on a person removing briefing papers from the president’s desk, described as an act of treason and sedition, and discussions of withholding information from him by intelligence agencies. - An “asteroid belt” around Trump’s inner circle is described as blocking entry for others who might report to him, with gatekeepers preventing action and limiting accountability. - The lack of action within the administration is presented as a major concern, with questions about personnel in critical departments. Specific issues include unfilled ambassadorial and deputy positions across the State, Defense, and other departments, and the presence of loyalists to the prior administration. - Names and potential targets of concern are discussed, though the speaker emphasizes not knowing all the names or proving definitively. Todd Blanche is repeatedly mentioned as a name that comes up in intel tracking, and there are claims about Maria? (likely Susie Wiles) and Susie Wiles as gatekeepers; Noel Frisch’s reporting on Susie Wiles is referenced; Sergio Gore is noted as removed from White House personnel and now ambassador to India; Scavino is mentioned as involved in personnel matters. - The conversation highlights the roles of various actors: Rubio’s connections to Cuba are discussed in the context of broader foreign influence; comparisons are drawn between actors connected to Cuba, the CCP, and Chevron, suggesting influence operations. - The Trump administration is accused of having eight deputy positions in intelligence and defense occupied by people not loyal to Trump, with similar loyalties issues in the DOJ and other departments; cited examples include the delay in implementing executive orders and foreign policy reforms, such as rewriting the foreign service manual and a supposed ninety-day review of foreign assistance. - There is skepticism about the ability to replace or reform agencies like TSA and FEMA while personnel are acting or non-loyal; concerns about ambassadors who resigned on day one still remaining in place are voiced. - The impeachment discussion centers on the belief that Trump will be impeached if Republicans lose the House or Senate, with claims that impeachment would hinge on charges like failure to hold people accountable; the claim is made that there has been extensive investigation into Russia collusion and January 6, and that treason and sedition have been carried out by others, which should prompt accountability but currently do not. - The broader political strategy is described as ongoing information warfare, with allegations that those in power would use impeachment or punitive measures against Trump supporters, while those currently in power have allegedly violated constitutional duties, including border policy and redress of grievances. - They reference the Seditious Six and assert that those individuals are encouraging military disobedience; the argument is that accountability is needed, and if not, those who supported Trump may feel betrayed. - Laura Logan promotes her forthcoming episode of Going Rogue, inviting viewers to see receipts and evidence, and thanks the host,予 noting Christmas wishes and closing remarks.

Today's CIA has become politicized and weaponized, posing a threat to America. Trump, wary of the intelligence community after being spied on, chose to fund his own transition team. Former CIA officials express a belief that the government exists to serve itself rather than the people, reflecting a troubling mindset within the agency. The top 20% of the CIA is described as malignant narcissists, while the majority are seen as patriotic but constrained by leadership. Fixing the CIA requires significant personnel changes, as current leaders are entrenched in a culture that prioritizes their agenda over serving the public. Effective oversight and the inclusion of experienced, conservative voices are crucial for reforming the agency and ensuring it fulfills its intended purpose of national defense.

So, Kash Patel was tragically confirmed as FBI director, and now Dan Bongino, a right-wing conspiracy theorist with zero FBI experience, has been appointed as his number two. This is alarming because the deputy director position requires someone with extensive experience, character, and trust, especially given their access to sensitive operations and collaboration with allied intelligence agencies. Bongino is known for pushing conspiracy theories, like the big lie about the 2020 election, and spreading COVID disinformation. Instead of focusing on critical issues like fentanyl trafficking and violent crime, he's likely to prioritize political vendettas. As Bongino himself said, he doesn't want to move on, which makes him completely unsuited to serve the American people's priorities.

The DOJ and FBI must report to congressional committees, with strong leadership from Republicans to enforce valid subpoenas. This requires a coordinated effort, similar to how Russiagate was addressed, involving multiple agencies like DOD, CIA, NSA, and others. The American public supported Donald Trump, and a collective approach is essential moving forward. Regarding Senate confirmations, the traditional process allows presidential candidates to present their cabinet as a package in early January. This has been done by previous presidents, including Joe Biden. The goal is to ensure Trump receives the same opportunity without creating unnecessary obstacles, emphasizing the need for uniform application of the Constitution in Washington, D.C., as the public desires.

The conversation centers on the Epstein file controversy, the DOJ's handling of it, and what the speakers see as systemic failures and political risk for Donald Trump and allied figures. - The Epstein/file issue is framed as predictable and frustrating. Alex Jones notes a “slow drip of nothing” and calls the initial promise of full file disclosure a pattern of “promise something, deliver nothing.” Pam Bondi’s statement that “the files were on my desk” is discussed as an apparent misstep or staged moment, but the core point is that large amounts of material are not being released despite public promises. - The discourse questions where the files actually reside and who controls access. The claim that a “truckload of files” existed and was hidden at DOJ is rejected as a mischaracterization; the speakers emphasize that the FBI and DOJ have files, but access and disclosure have been hampered by internal political dynamics. They highlight the tension between the Southern District of New York and the DOJ, noting that SDNY answers to the DOJ and the Attorney General, thereby questioning the premise that one regional office is independently sabotaging access. - There is a persistent critique of DOJ leadership and governance. The argument is that DOJ has not been “rooted out of corruption,” with mid-level and high-level managers and appointees still in place, propagating practices that the speakers deem contrary to transparency and accountability. They point to supposed failures by individuals such as Cash Patel and Pam Bondi in relying on FBI briefings rather than verifiable records, suggesting that power in intelligence agencies is still too dependent on information control. - The Epstein files are treated as emblematic of a broader issue: a two-tier or selective justice system. The speakers argue that there’s a pattern whereby powerful individuals have access to information and protection, while the public lacks full visibility. They mention that Trump’s response and the way the files have been handled have become a larger “Russiagate-like” narrative, with Epstein serving as a lightning rod for accusations of corruption and cover-up. - The political dynamic is central. Several participants emphasize that Trump’s stance and the responses of his allies are under intense scrutiny. They discuss the risk that Trump’s association with the Epstein disclosures could become a political liability if the files aren’t released. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Tom Massey are mentioned as consistent voices pushing for full disclosure, while Roger Stone’s warnings about CIA and foreign involvement in the Epstein nexus are cited as supporting the view that a larger, international financial/transnational network may be implicated. - There is criticism of how the media and political opponents handle the issue. The speakers claim Democrats are using hearings to turn the Epstein matter into a broader political weapon and to portray Trump as obstructive or complicit, regardless of the factual state of file disclosure. They argue that the public is being led by a PR war, with “photoshopped” or redacted material used to frame narratives rather than to reveal truth. - The discussion turns toward accountability and remedies. The speakers insist that federal law requires the release of the Epstein files by a deadline, and that failing to comply constitutes a constitutional or institutional crisis. They argue that Congress lacks direct enforcement power and must consider funding or other leverage to compel compliance, noting the apparent reluctance of Congress to act decisively. - There are predictions about personnel changes and institutional reform. Dan Bongino is discussed as likely to depart from his DOJ-related role, with Todd Blanche as the lead prosecutor taking heat for not meeting deadlines. Andrew Bailey is floated as a potential replacement. The broader implication is that there will be a shake-up in DOJ and possibly FBI leadership in the near term, though the speakers acknowledge uncertainty about how far reforms will go or whether entrenched interests will impede real change. - The Epstein matter is used to illustrate how compromises and cover-ups operate across power structures. The speakers argue that the problem isn’t just the existence of the files but how the system treats those files—how access is controlled, how redactions are justified, and how political narratives are constructed around high-profile investigations. Harmony Dillon and Liz Harrington are cited as voices who underscore the need for mid-level reform and more transparency, suggesting that the deepest issues lie in organizational culture and incentives rather than in isolated acts by a few individuals. - A broader reflection on American governance finishes the discussion. The speakers warn that a failure to release the Epstein files or to purge corrupt practices could deepen distrust in federal institutions and threaten the legitimacy of the government. They suggest that if reform stalls, the country might devolve into a state-by-state dynamic or other less cohesive arrangements, as confidence in a functioning central government erodes. In summary, the transcript frames the Epstein file disclosures as a litmus test for DOJ integrity and political accountability. It portrays a pattern of delayed or selective disclosure, questions about who controls information within the FBI/DOJ, and a risk that political calculations are interfering with lawful obligations. It also foresees significant leadership changes and intensified scrutiny of the department in the near future, with Epstein serving as a focal point for broader critiques of how power and information are managed in the United States.

Donald Trump attempted to appoint me as deputy director of the CIA, but Gina Haskill, who was involved in the Russia investigation, opposed it, claiming it would jeopardize her position. This was ironic, given her role in the controversy. Former officials expressed concern not about specific plans but about Trump's unpredictable whims and ideology. There’s significant political corruption at high levels of government, with the administration seemingly prioritizing Trump's personal interests and misusing intelligence and law enforcement authorities. Investigations, like the one into Cash Patel, often rely on anonymous sources, leaving individuals uncertain about their status. My own experience involved a lengthy investigation without my knowledge, only revealed years later through a notification from Google. Most people in the intelligence community and law enforcement are committed to their roles.

It's an honor to be here today. I'm grateful to President Trump for nominating me to serve as the Director of National Intelligence at a time when trust in the intelligence community is at an all time low. For too long, faulty intelligence has led to costly failures, such as the invasion of Iraq. The American people elected Donald Trump as their president twice, yet the FBI and intelligence agencies were politicized to undermine his presidency and falsely portray him as a puppet of Putin. Title one of FISA was used illegally to spy on Carter Page. Tony Blinken was the impetus for the 51 former senior intelligence officials' letter dismissing Hunter Biden's laptop as disinformation to help Biden win the election. James Clapper lied to this committee in 2013, denying the existence of programs that facilitated the mass collection of Americans' phone and Internet records, yet was never held accountable. The CIA spied on congress and the FBI abused its power to surveil Catholics who attend traditional Latin mass. Just twenty four hours after I criticized Kamala Harris, I was placed on a secret domestic terror watch list called Quiet Skies. This must end. President Trump's reelection is a clear mandate to break this cycle of failure and begin to restore trust in those who've been charged with securing our nation.

Kash Patel is unfit to be FBI director due to his lack of character and integrity. He is a sycophant who will misuse the bureau's resources and weaponize it against political opponents. Unlike others in the Trump administration, Patel crossed moral, ethical, and legal lines. Adam Schiff is a criminal who lied about his interactions with a whistleblower named Charmela to set up a presidential impeachment of Donald Trump. Schiff met with Charmela and then led the prosecution of Trump's impeachment trial in the Senate. Schiff was conflicted out of the game because he was part of the hoax. As the prosecutor in the case against Trump, that is the ultimate conflict of interest.

If Trump is reelected, the Justice Department and the FBI will be in serious danger. Trump recognizes their power and regrets not corrupting them enough during his first term. He will target these institutions by appointing loyalists, even if they are not qualified, to carry out his agenda. This should concern every American. Regardless of your feelings about Joe Biden, it is crucial to vote for him. The alternative is too dangerous, so do not sit on the sidelines during this election.

Many fail to grasp the extent of corruption in institutions that Trump was elected to reform. It's wrong to label Dan Bongino, a former law enforcement and Secret Service agent who risked his life for this nation, as a far-right podcaster. The President trusts him for a vital role because he's an outsider to the Washington swamp. Such appointments make insiders nervous, as Bongino, Patel, and Bondi aim to end government weaponization and root out corruption in these agencies once and for all.

Moving forward with Kash Patel's nomination as FBI director will likely provoke significant backlash. Many believe he seeks to disrupt the institution, but he is profoundly unqualified for the role. His experience in federal government is limited to three years as a line attorney at DOJ headquarters, with no leadership or management experience. The idea of him leading an organization of 37,000 people, with operations across 400 locations and sensitive global roles, is unrealistic. It’s hard to imagine him commanding respect in a room full of police chiefs and sheriffs.

This country is suffering under a government that is influenced by an anti-American faction, including universities, news media, corporate CEOs, and the bureaucracy. However, we have the ability to fight back. The truth is starting to emerge, especially with the FBI. The Durham report and the inspector general's report have exposed the corruption and politicization within the FBI. We need to break up the FBI and replace it with a more reasonable law enforcement system, removing the entire senior leadership. The investigations and actions taken by House Republicans are part of a counter offensive against the left. President Trump's non-establishment status is why they despise and fear him.

Last week, Kash Patel was confirmed as FBI director, and now Dan Bongino, a right-wing conspiracy theorist and podcaster, has been appointed as his number two. Bongino has zero experience at the FBI, and this deputy director position has always been held by a long-term veteran of the bureau for over a hundred years, because this person has access to sensitive operations, including surveillance and working with our allies' intelligence agencies. Bongino is known for pushing conspiracy theories, like the big lie that Donald Trump won the 2020 election. He's also a COVID disinformation super spreader and a Russia denier. Instead of focusing on fentanyl traffickers, murderers, and violent criminals, he's going to be focused on the political vendettas of Donald Trump, because he doesn't want to move on.

The discussion centers on how politicization of intelligence has manifested in different eras, comparing past and present administrations. Speaker 0 asks whether the politicized weapons claims about Iraq and the CIA’s statements in the 1990s can be compared to today’s politicization of intelligence under John Ratcliffe and Tulsi Gabbard as head of DNI, arguing it is much worse now because of the mediocrity of those in control of key agencies. Speaker 1 counters by recalling the 1980s, noting that there was significant politicization of the Soviet threat to justify Reagan’s defense buildup, and adds that this is why he testified against Robert Gates in 1991. He asserts that politicization is bad, and insists that the current situation is worse than in the past. Speaker 1 explains: “It’s Because I look at the people who are ahead of these groups. Come on. Let’s be serious.” He targets the leadership of the director of national intelligence, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the CIA, saying, “Have you ever seen a cabinet in The United States of such mediocrity, of such venality?” He emphasizes his background, stating, “I haven’t,” and that nothing compares to what is going on now, warning that “a lot of damage is being done to The United States and to the constitution of The United States and to the importance of separation of powers and the importance of rule of law and the importance of checks and balances. This is very serious stuff.” Speaker 0 attempts to steer toward historical figures like Robert Maxwell, but Speaker 1 dismisses that concern as off point, insisting he is making a point about Israel. The exchange then shifts to U.S. support for Israel, with Speaker 1 asserting that “Israel gets what it wants from The United States. It gets it from democratic presidents and from republican presidents.” He also criticizes Barack Obama for signing what he calls “that ten year $40,000,000,000 arms aid agreement,” arguing that Obama “never should have signed” it “because they treated Obama so shabbily in the first place.”

Afshan and Rutansi host Going Underground from the UAE, discussing Gaza hunger amid Western actions and the wider US-Israeli war context in West Asia, alongside references to Iran, Venezuela, and Cuba. They introduce Melvin Goodman, a former CIA officer and whistleblower who criticized politicization of intelligence, and now a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy, a Johns Hopkins government professor, and Counterpunch columnist. Netanyahu’s White House visit is highlighted: Israeli Channel 14 claims Netanyahu demanded complete cancellation of Iran’s nuclear program, zero uranium enrichment, removal of enrichment capabilities, limits on ballistic missiles to 300 kilometers, and intensive, genuine oversight of Iran. The hosts question Netanyahu’s influence and the ease with which an Israeli prime minister can press a US president. Speaker Goodman notes Netanyahu has a very good relationship with Trump, citing Netanyahu as a “houseguest” of the Kushner family in the past, and asserts the ceasefire is a joke as people die. He suggests Netanyahu will push for military force, with targets possibly concentrating on Iranian ballistic missile sites rather than nuclear facilities, based on satellite imagery of reconstruction. Goodman calls Netanyahu a “war president” and warns the government could move further right; he says the US continues to provide and may increase military aid to Israel despite civilian harm. Afshan and Goodman discuss US policy under Trump and Biden, agreeing that both have cooperated with genocide in Gaza. They contrast Netanyahu’s alignment with Trump and US arms support to Israel, noting heavy tonnage bombings and ongoing military aid. The conversation shifts to US intelligence and leadership: Goodman discusses CIA director John Ratcliffe as a political appointee, the broader claim that Trump’s administration is the worst cabinet in US history, and the need for the CIA to tell truth to power. Goodman states Ratcliffe has kept CIA out of the news regarding Venezuelan, Caribbean, and Pacific intelligence activities, aiding US military actions, while criticizing Trump’s overall approach to intelligence and governance. Ukraine is addressed briefly: Bill Burns as Moscow ambassador is argued to have not gone quiet, having warned both sides. They discuss genocide labels for Russia’s actions in Ukraine and the Gaza situation, with a back-and-forth about whether similar terms apply to Ukraine and Gaza. Goodman argues NATO expansion is a root cause of the war, and that Trump’s approach lacks a clear long-term disarmament strategy. He recalls participating in SALT I and ABM treaty contexts and critiques the Trump administration’s handling of arms control negotiations, blaming the absence of seasoned negotiators and the influence of non-experts like real estate billionaires on policy. The START treaty expiry is mentioned, with expectations of renewed talks and the importance of limits on new weapons from Russia and China. Goodman emphasizes the need to negotiate, noting past successes like the partial test ban treaty and INF/ABM treaties, and warns that the current US trajectory risks an arms race and destabilization, especially given China’s rapidly growing arsenal. The interview broadens to Epstein-related political pressure, noting Trump’s use of the Department of Justice and alleged pressure from various sources, including claims about Epstein files. Goodman discusses domestic pressures on Trump, including personnel changes and public opinion. Toward the end, Goodman cautions that the US aims to “be king of the Western Hemisphere,” and warns of dark days for Cuba and Venezuela, as Latin American governments move right in response to US policy. He observes a lack of coherent diplomatic channels and disarmament engagement, concluding that the near term is not optimistic. The program ends with condolences for Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran victims, and a teaser for a Saturday episode.

The Trump administration has executed a significant purge at the FBI, dismissing all six senior executives and multiple heads of field offices. This includes the leader of the Washington DC office, which was involved in prosecuting Trump, and several federal prosecutors linked to the January 6 investigations. These officials are career law enforcement professionals, not political appointees, and their removal could severely impact the FBI's ability to address terrorism and crime nationwide. Additionally, the acting deputy attorney general has requested a list of FBI employees involved in January 6 cases, affecting personnel across various field offices. This upheaval leaves local offices in disarray and raises concerns about the future of federal law enforcement.

The speaker discusses being targeted for their knowledge and potential role in a second Trump administration. They suggest shutting down the Department of Education and reforming intelligence agencies like the FBI and CIA. They highlight the need to address deep state elements within the government. The speaker emphasizes the need for significant government reform to combat embedded bureaucratic influences.

President Trump was almost jailed by his own Justice Department in his first term, due to figures like Jack Smith and Lisa Monaco. There should be a grand jury investigating the entire apparatus, as the problem is systemic, not just personnel-related. The FBI should be taken apart brick by brick, and its headquarters should be up for sale. The FBI's culture rewards corruption and cowardice in ethics and morality. The FBI has the best PR operation in Washington, D.C., making them untouchable, with no one in Congress willing to defang or cut their funding. Members of Congress are intimidated.

I want to highlight the exceptional qualities of this individual, who brings a wealth of experience from his time at the FBI and the Secret Service. He is a dedicated patriot who has served our nation with distinction. His understanding of the deep-seated corruption within these institutions is precisely why President Trump sought him out to drive change. It's disheartening to witness attempts to mislabel him. He is a former law enforcement officer and Secret Service agent who risked his life for this country. The president has entrusted him with this crucial role because he's an outsider to the Washington swamp, and his appointment, along with others, signals a commitment to rooting out corruption and ending the weaponization of government.

Kash Patel is now the FBI director, a positive development. Dan Bongino will be the deputy director, assisting Patel. Bongino has highlighted abuses of the deep state and the FBI and has a storied law enforcement career, making him a near-perfect fit. He will run the FBI's day-to-day operations under Patel. The question is whether Patel can save the FBI, which has been corrupted. The FBI raided President Trump's home and gave the speaker a subpoena, which they claim is abusive. The FBI has been targeting the opposition to the deep state and the democratic left machine, subverting the rule of law and the constitutional republic. The issue is whether the FBI can be relied upon to uphold the rule of law and advance the public interest.