reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Muslims in Britain and Western Europe have more rights, including freedom of worship, than in any Islamic country. However, problems arise when failures of Islamic societies, such as intolerance of freedom of conscience, apostates, expression, minorities, and women, are imported into Britain. The call for a parallel legal system is considered monstrous, as no other group demands such a thing. The speaker asserts that Western Europe's laws are based on reason, while Islam's are based on revelation, creating a fundamental conflict. It is the Muslims of Europe who have let down Europe. Muslims must understand they have no right not to be offended and cannot justify violence or censorship because they dislike something. They should not demand more hate laws to defend Islam. A society where even the deepest feelings can be challenged is the only one worth living in. Islam has failed Europe and its own Muslims.

Cooperation, like in religion with shared beliefs about God, also relies on fiction in legal, political, and economic fields. Legal systems are often based on belief in human rights, which are fictional stories, not biological realities. Humans have no inherent rights, just as jellyfish or woodpeckers don't. Rights exist only in invented stories. Similarly, states and nations are stories, unlike tangible realities like mountains. Countries like the United States are powerful stories, but they are not something one can physically perceive.

The international order has been built over generations. Ordinary people are too small-minded to govern themselves. Order and progress require individuals to surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign.

"Many, maybe most legal systems are based on this idea, this belief in human rights, but human rights are just like heaven and like God." "It's just a fictional story that we've invented and spread around." "It is not a biological reality." "The only place you find rights is in the fictional stories that humans have invented and spread around." "States and nations are also like human rights and like God and like heaven, they too are just stories." "A mountain is a reality." "Israel or The United States, they are just stories." "You can't really see The United States." "You cannot touch it."

The speaker believes humanity's deepest uniting stories are religious. Leaders who presume no transcendent unity or foundational truth are beholden to no one above themselves. Humanity has strived to conceptualize a divine principle of sovereignty to which everyone is beholden and by whom they're judged. A sovereign spiritual process exists that even rulers must adhere to. Leaders in positions of power with nothing to be beholden to will tend to regard themselves as the sole source of authority, order, and progress. This is dangerous and totalitarian. A divine sovereign principle is a fundamental protection against the totalitarian assumption that the leader himself is God.

Speaker 0 argues that Sharia law should be above the US constitution, stating, “US constitution which is made by people and the Sharia law is made by Allah. So that is the all the way above. That has to be definitely in the land, not for the America, for the whole world would be above.” In other words, Sharia law is superior to the US constitution and should be established not only in America but worldwide. Speaker 1 agrees with the idea, reiterating the claim by asking, “So that should be above the US constitution.”

Legal systems and human rights are like fictional stories, not biological realities. Just as animals have no rights, humans don't either. States and nations, like the United States or Israel, are powerful stories but not tangible realities like mountains. They are just stories we believe in, but cannot see, touch, or smell. Translation: Legal systems and human rights are like fictional stories, not biological realities. Just as animals have no rights, humans don't either. States and nations, like the United States or Israel, are powerful stories but not tangible realities like mountains. They are just stories we believe in, but cannot see, touch, or smell.

The only form of equality that aligns with personal liberty is equality before the law. The concept of equality of opportunity is limited; for instance, not everyone can become a great boxer or basketball player. Therefore, the focus should be solely on achieving equality before the law.

No one is above the law. This principle is emphasized repeatedly to stress that everyone is accountable under the law, regardless of their status or position. The message is clear: the law applies equally to all individuals.

Speaker 0 discusses collective punishment as disgusting and expresses fear that the United States may be crossing a Rubicon, drifting toward a moral framework it may not recognize. The question is raised: are we adopting the ethics of the Israeli government? Acknowledge that Israel is a very complicated topic with 9,000,000 people, not all of whom agree with this stuff. But the Israeli government has been moving ever more openly toward a policy where, “I don’t like the guy, but I’m also gonna kill his kids because they could grow up to be that guy.” This is described as the antithesis of Western civilization. There is a distinction between East and West. Western civilization, Christian civilization rejects that approach. It is not just a piece of civilization but the foundation stone of civilization. This is why we don’t put families on trial for the crimes of the father, whereas other countries do. We never have, and we never can, because that’s the opposite of justice. The most basic concept in the West is that God created each person as an individual, and as an individual, you’ll be judged for what you do, not for what your ancestors did or what children did. This “primacy of the individual” created by God and the existence of the individual soul form the basis of what used to be called human rights. Human rights apply to humans by virtue of the fact they’re human; the rights come from God because He made humans in His image.

We often rely on stereotypes, like judges should have no opinions. That's false. If it were true, computers could run our justice system. Input the facts, spin the wheel, and get the correct decision. But that's not how justice works, nor should it. People who know me know I have opinions about many things.

Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the declaration of independence and hence our form of government. It holds that our rights and our dignities come not from god but from government. It requires of the people a subservience and weakness incompatible with a constitution premised on the transcendent origin of our rights.

Each individual owns their own life, and therefore no one has the right to demand the life of another. The right to life means the right to one's own life, not the life of someone else.

Everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation, gender identity, race, religion, or disabilities, deserves equal protection of their human rights. It is our responsibility to ensure the protection of these rights for everyone.

They aim to harm us for disagreeing with them. Our justice system no longer prioritizes truth, but winning at all costs.

Most legal systems and human rights are fictional stories humans have invented and spread around, not biological realities. Just as animals have no rights, humans don't either. States and nations, like Israel or the United States, are powerful stories we believe in, but they are not tangible realities like mountains. They cannot be seen, touched, or smelled.

In a court of law, the truth should prevail. Trial by television or guilt by accusation undermines freedom.

Legal systems and the concept of human rights are fictional stories that humans have created and spread around. Just like jellyfish or woodpeckers, humans do not inherently possess rights. The idea of states and nations, such as Israel or the United States, are also just stories. Unlike a tangible mountain, these entities cannot be seen, touched, or smelled.

The entire justice enterprise in The United States depends upon an honor system. It depends upon them telling the truth. It depends upon them abiding a promise they made to tell the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. And we are long past the days when that oath was backed in most people by a fear of going to hell. And so it turns out it's an honor system. To get information, to be able to find the truth, and the truth is a real thing. There are facts. That honor system has to be enforced with an iron fist so the system will work, so the truth can be found in a reliable way.

But to have a great nation, you have to have religion. I believe that so strongly. There has to be something after we go through all of this, and that something is God.

Most legal systems and human rights are fictional stories invented by humans. Just like jellyfish and woodpeckers, humans have no inherent rights. States and nations, like the United States or Israel, are also just powerful stories, not tangible realities like mountains. These concepts are appealing narratives, but ultimately not biologically or physically real.

Humans and their rights are compared to animals like jellyfish and woodpeckers, with the speaker arguing that rights are fictional stories. They claim that humans have control over their environment and can make decisions, but others disagree. The speaker believes that humans have the power to shape their world and were made in the image of God. However, others argue that humans do not have free will and that rights are just constructs. The debate revolves around the existence and importance of human rights and the role of individuals in shaping society.

Many, maybe most legal systems are based on this idea, this belief in human rights, but 'human rights are just like heaven and like God.' 'It's just a fictional story that we've invented and spread around.' It may be a very nice story, but 'It's not a reality.' 'Just as jellyfish and woodpeckers and ostriches have no rights, homo sapiens have no rights also.' 'States and nations are also like human rights and like God and like heaven, they too are just stories.' 'A mountain is a reality.' You can see it, you can touch it, you can even smell it, 'But Israel or The United States, they are just stories, very powerful stories, stories we might want to believe very much, but still they are just stories.' You can't really see The United States. You cannot touch it. You cannot smell it.