reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 argues that abortion is murder and frames it as a ritual akin to human sacrifice, claiming civilizations like the Incas and Vikings killed people to appease gods and gain power. They insist abortion isn’t ritualistic, reference an abortion truck outside the Democratic convention, and challenge the idea that abortion is a right, suggesting that abortion is the only right people have. They express empathy for individuals who might face pregnancy decisions, recounting childhood conversations about a 12-year-old farmworker who might be pregnant from rape, and acknowledge sadness about abortion, but insist that now abortion is “the only right you have.” Speaker 1 pushes back by denying that abortion is a ritual and emphasizes that people do not have the right to keep someone from taking a medical injection or consuming unknown products, arguing that the only right claimed is to murder one’s own children. They describe the statement as dark and urge Speaker 0 to reconsider their stance. Speaker 0 responds with a personal perspective as a father, asserting that the most important thing in life is having children and that one’s children are what will matter most. They reject the notion that jobs or material concerns are paramount and criticize the idea of just killing one’s children. They apologize to Brookie for the upset but maintain their view that abortion is grotesque and sad, noting that many people who have abortions are not happy about it. Speaker 1 contends they don’t care about what Speaker 0 says and asserts a lack of interest in further discussion. Speaker 0 elaborates on the idea that the issue is highly ideological and that the reality of abortion is often hidden behind abstractions. They argue that a human being is beheaded with a knife inside a woman, insisting that if beheading didn’t take place, that person could have led a different life, and that it is not for us to kill people simply because they are “in the way.” They warn that if it is permissible to kill children who are in the way, then the elderly or even others could be killed as well, concluding with the assertion that you can’t do that. Speaker 1 reiterates that abortion is a matter of human rights, while Speaker 0 maintains that there is no human right to kill people, insisting that killing people is the enemy of human rights and that the human right is to live. The conversation ends with an unresolved tension between preserving life and recognizing individual rights, framed by extreme positions about abortion and its moral implications.

The speaker discusses concerns about late-term abortions and the alleged practice of keeping babies alive after birth to harvest their organs. They mention the governor of Virginia's comments, but the speaker claims they didn't see it. They suggest that these babies are kept alive for a short period, and their organs are registered and sold for profit. The speaker also mentions that California has passed a law related to this issue, and Virginia, New York, and three other states are trying to pass similar laws.

The speaker discusses the position of Trump and his running mate on abortion. They state that Trump and his running mate say they believe in exceptions to abortion bans to save the mother's life. The speaker then says, "Let's break that down."

The speaker recalls being ridiculed during a 2020 Democratic debate for advocating a return to the party's roots of fighting for the people and free speech. According to the speaker, the Democratic Party has since become more extreme because it is not rooted in the Constitution. The speaker claims that many Democrats refuse to accept objective truth, citing the example of denying the existence of men and women. The speaker alleges that this denial stems from a spiritual problem where individuals believe they are God and can designate truth.

The Democratic Party is repeatedly pushing debunked hoaxes while claiming to be the good guys. Politicians often exaggerate, but the deliberate spread of falsehoods crosses a line. For example, they misinterpret Trump's comments about protecting women from illegal immigrants, twisting his words to suggest he was infringing on women's rights. Similarly, claims that Trump wanted to execute Liz Cheney are false; he merely suggested that if she faced the realities of war, she might reconsider her stance. Legacy media amplifies these lies, and without platforms like Twitter, many of these issues would remain hidden. There's frustration over the lack of visibility for significant interviews, as they seem to be suppressed on platforms like YouTube.

- The speaker notes dated 07/25/2022, reporting on developments related to baby deaths and baby funerals. They reference the UK government website, and specifically Northampton NHS in detail mentioning children's funerals, noting that contracts for this area have appeared that were previously unseen. They point to contractfinderservice.gov.uk and advise looking for “children's and babies' funerals.” They identify several awarded contracts, including one for Hertfordshire, another for Hertfordshire specifically for baby funerals, and contracts awarded for Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS, and Leicester Hospitals NHS. - The speaker mentions that the WNHS is another organization involved for those who do not want to have Mexican arranged funerals, stating that they will do that for you now. - A doctor in Australia, Dr. Luke McClinton, is described as leading the fertility services at the Mater Hospital and as a principal investigator for a series of randomized controlled trials. He is also described as the president of the Australian Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine and is labeled as “the top doctor in Australia in this field.” - The speaker asserts that Dr. Luke McClinton was sacked on Friday for not getting the jab and for attempting to release his data on miscarriages post-vaccination. They state that he has until the following Friday to exit his private practice rooms, as he is no longer allowed to practice in public or private settings. - The speaker claims that Dr. McClinton has been investigating miscarriages in couples post-vaccination and states that the “normal miscarriage rate” is between five and perhaps as high as sixteen percent. They then claim that since the introduction of the vaccine, he has found that seventy-four percent of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages. - The speaker reiterates the statistic: “Seventy four percent of women are having miscarriages who are vaccinated.” They suggest that this statistic would explain why hospitals allegedly want to deal directly with crematoria, with vans taking multiple babies directly to the crematorium, bypassing funeral directors. The speaker emphasizes that they had previously mentioned these points.

Speaker 1 is asked about their previous tweets regarding Trump and Brian Kemp stealing elections. Speaker 1 dismisses the comparison as ridiculous and clarifies that they were referring to the threat to voting rights at that time.

President Trump has stated he will veto a national abortion ban, viewing it as a state's rights issue. The speaker believes that if a baby can survive outside the womb, abortion is not permissible; it constitutes murder at that stage of gestation. The speaker claims the education system has instilled terror in girls and women, pushing the idea that pregnancy is the end of their lives and careers. This fear leads them to believe they must have access to abortion, even in extreme circumstances, and they will vote against any candidate who might restrict it. The speaker asserts that having children brings more joy than anything else and that it is natural to love one's children.

The speaker criticizes Democrats for a recent tweet they deleted, which claimed that an email proves Donald Trump spent Thanksgiving with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017 when Trump was already president. The speaker argues that a simple Google search shows exactly what Trump did that day, demonstrating he did not spend Thanksgiving with Epstein. They claim the tweet is part of a pattern of lies that the official Democrats Twitter account posts, noting they leave other lies up but deleted this one. The speaker asserts that Trump was in Mar-a-Lago, Florida, the entire day on Thanksgiving 2017, and emphasizes that Epstein had been banned from Mar-a-Lago years earlier. They state that minutes from that day exist because Trump was president, detailing where he was and what he did, reinforcing the claim that he did not spend Thanksgiving with Epstein. Despite the tweet being deleted, the speaker notes that it had already gone viral, with millions of views and many big Twitter accounts reposting the claim that Trump was with Epstein on Thanksgiving in 2017. The deletion is acknowledged as a move that will attract attention, but the speaker views it as a consequence of pushing a false narrative. The speaker contends that the pattern is harmful: once people learn they were lied to, it damages the credibility of those who spread the lie and can cause people to oppose them more. They argue that the ongoing propagation of hoaxes will continue to be debunked, and that debunking efforts will build trust with the American people while the other side destroys its own credibility. In closing, the speaker vows to keep debunking hoaxes and to continue gaining trust with the American people, asserting that the responsible action is to expose the falsehoods and highlight the supposed consequences for those who spread them.

Abortion was legalized in this country, and crime rates subsequently dropped by 40%. The speaker questions whether abortion is responsible for the decrease in crime. They mention that statistics show that women, particularly black women, have the highest abortion rates. However, the speaker criticizes the idea of targeting black individuals for termination, calling it racist.

The speaker claims that women who received the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. They state that this is the same miscarriage rate observed in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market analysis.

Remember, I am summarizing the video as if I were the original speakers. Speaker 0: Democrats all voted against tax cuts on tips, overtime, and Social Security. Keep that in mind next time they act like they care about you. Speaker 1: You need to fact check information online before spreading lies with your MAGA hat on. The claim that Democrats voted against tax cuts on tips and overtime has already been debunked, even on Elon Musk's platform. The original poster even deleted it after being fact checked. Those tax cuts weren't in the bill anyway, but cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security were. Take off the hat, put down the phone, and think about what kind of country you want your kids to grow up in, one that rewards billionaires at the expense of the middle class?

My Republican colleagues, led by Donald Trump, are in a meltdown because their presidential nominee and policies are unpopular. They are pushing for a nationwide abortion ban and their project 2025 is failing. Democrats just want to focus on moving the country forward and prioritizing people over politics.

The speaker discusses a New England Journal of Medicine study from April 21, 2021, and an accompanying op-ed by Eric Rubin, Stephen Morrissey, and Rochelle Walensky, alleging they made false and fear-mongering statements about the risks to pregnant women, unborn children, and newborns if they didn't get vaccinated. This was allegedly done despite evidence suggesting pregnancy reduced maternal mortality and data showing the COVID-19 vaccine was the deadliest and most injurious vaccine ever released. The speaker claims the study, authored by 21 federal employees including Tom Shimabukuro, was biased. Out of 827 pregnant women in the study, they highlight a claimed miscarriage rate of 12.6%, which they argue is abnormally high compared to the normal rate of 3% at a normal booking visit. They allege that 700 of the women received the vaccine in their third trimester, but were artificially placed in the first trimester data. This allegedly skewed the miscarriage rate for women vaccinated in the first trimester to 82%, which is the same miscarriage rate seen in the Pfizer post-market data.

Are there any states where women face prosecution for having an abortion? No. Are there states that criminalize miscarriage or the care for it? No. Are there states that criminalize removing an ectopic pregnancy? No. Are there states that prohibit life-saving care for the mother? No. Women do not need to be actively dying for doctors to provide care. There’s a lot of rhetoric that may deter women from accessing healthcare. Recently, Vice President Harris claimed women are being arrested for miscarriages. However, there are no known instances of women being arrested for miscarriages or related healthcare. Misleading examples can scare women away from seeking necessary treatment.

At the time of the election, the Republican Party was allegedly changing its platform to support abortion up to twenty-seven weeks and the abortion pill. The speaker claims Republican candidates lobbied against a full abortion ban in Arizona, instead favoring a policy where a woman can allegedly "murder her baby the day before it's born." The speaker believes candidates operate based on money/donors and fear of backlash. The speaker claims that Trump said Florida's bans go too far, prompting the speaker to publicly disagree, risking donor loss. The speaker argues against voting for the "lesser of two evils" and emphasizes not fearing opposition. The speaker references an Irish revolutionary quote about sacrificing one's reputation for peace. The speaker and one other pro-life leader allegedly leveraged the Trump team. After the speaker's statement, the Trump team contacted the speaker to negotiate for pro-life support.

The speaker objects to the claim that Democrats are a party of pedophiles. They state that while Democrats support children being sexualized and having transgender surgeries, and that President Biden himself supports this, this does not make them pedophiles. The speaker equates sexualizing children with what pedophiles do.

The speaker discusses concerns about late-term abortions and the alleged practice of keeping babies alive after birth to harvest their organs. They mention the governor of Virginia's comments, but the speaker claims they didn't see it. They suggest that these babies are kept alive for a short period, and their organs are registered for bidding, potentially making large sums of money. The speaker also mentions that California has passed a law related to this, and Virginia, New York, and three other states are trying to pass similar legislation.

Speaker 0 claims that Speaker 1 will sign a national abortion ban and that Project 2025 includes a national abortion monitor. Speaker 1 denies both claims, calling them lies. Speaker 0 states that no state allows killing a baby after birth or abortion of a carried pregnancy. Speaker 2 says an infant would be delivered, kept comfortable, and resuscitated if desired, followed by a discussion between physicians and mothers. Speaker 0 says Speaker 1 stated there would be a "bloodbath" if he is not elected. Speaker 1 claims the term related to energy and tariffs on cars, stating, "if I don't get elected, it's gonna be a bloodbath." Speaker 0 references Charlottesville and Speaker 1's statement that there were "fine people on each side." Speaker 1 clarifies he was not referring to neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Speaker 0 states that he and Tim Walz are gun owners and want to pass an assault weapons ban, universal background checks, and red flag laws.

President Trump did not lie when he said Democrats are pushing abortions to the 9th month. Virginia Democrat lawmaker Kathy Tran has a bill that would remove statutes.

Are there states where women face prosecution for having an abortion? No. Do any states criminalize miscarriage or the care related to it? No. Are there states that criminalize removing an ectopic pregnancy or prohibit life-saving care for mothers? No. Women do not need to be actively dying for doctors to provide necessary care. There is concerning rhetoric that may deter women from seeking healthcare. Recently, Vice President Harris claimed women are being arrested for miscarriages. However, there is no evidence of any woman being arrested for this or for receiving healthcare related to it. Misleading examples can scare women away from necessary treatment.

In this video, Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about the timeframe for performing an abortion in the 3rd trimester if it would affect a woman's mental health. Speaker 1 mentions that the 3rd trimester goes up to 40 weeks and states that there is no limit in the bill. Speaker 0 then asks if a woman who is about to give birth could still request an abortion, and Speaker 1 says that it would be up to the doctor and the woman. Speaker 0 clarifies if the bill allows for this, and Speaker 1 confirms that it does.

The speaker clarified that while they mentioned using IVF, they used a different fertility treatment to have children. Regarding false statements made during their 2006 congressional campaign about a 1995 arrest for drunk and reckless driving, the speaker stated that people can see their record and those who vouch for them. The speaker discussed their infertility issues and the treatments that led to having children, contrasting this with those trying to take those rights away. They stated they won't apologize for speaking passionately about issues like guns in schools or reproductive rights. The speaker believes most Americans understand the difference between IVF/IUI and abortion bans that deny families the chance to have a child.

Senator and Dr. Verma engage in a contentious exchange about biology, pregnancy, and how science should guide medicine. The Senator presses: “Can men get pregnant?” He frames the question as a straightforward biological reality and argues that science and evidence should control, not politics. He emphasizes that there are biological men and biological women, and that women get pregnant. He notes that the abortion drug has safety concerns, stating that it “causes adverse health events in eleven percent of cases” and that this is “twenty two times greater than the FDA label,” asserting that this basic reality has not been acknowledged. Dr. Verma responds by describing his clinical practice, saying he cares for patients with different identities and for many women, including people who do not identify as women. He pauses when asked the binary question, explaining that he is unsure of the goal of the question and emphasizing the complexity of identity and medicine. He reframes the issue by saying that science and evidence should guide medicine, but he avoids giving a yes-or-no answer to the question of whether “biological men” can get pregnant. He characterizes such yes/no questions as political tools and stresses the need to address the experiences of patients rather than polarize the discussion. The Senator insists on a direct yes/no response, reiterating that the question is about biology and the truth, and that men are not pregnant. He argues that failing to acknowledge this undermines trust in science and could have constitutional implications for protections of women. Dr. Verma maintains that he is a physician who follows science and aims to represent the complex experiences of patients, and he again cautions against polarized framing. He expresses willingness to have a conversation that avoids polarization and politics. The exchange moves from the specific biology question to broader themes: the role of science in medicine, the intersection of gender identity with medical care, and the communication of medical facts in a political context. The Senator closes by emphasizing the distinction between biological reality and political narratives, reiterating that women get pregnant and highlighting safety concerns about abortion drugs. He thanks the witnesses and the chairman for the hearing, noting a focus on protecting women and following science, while indicating disappointment at the level of debate.

Speaker 0 claims that Speaker 1 will sign a national abortion ban and that Project 2025 includes a national abortion monitor. Speaker 1 denies both claims, calling them lies. Speaker 0 states that no state allows killing a baby after birth or a woman carrying a pregnancy to term and asking for an abortion. Speaker 2 says an infant would be delivered, kept comfortable, resuscitated if desired, and then physicians and the mother would have a discussion. Speaker 0 claims Speaker 1 said there would be a "bloodbath" if he is not elected. Speaker 1 says the term "bloodbath" related to energy and tariffs on cars. Speaker 0 claims Speaker 1 said there were "fine people on each side" in Charlottesville. Speaker 1 clarifies he was not talking about neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who he says should be condemned. Speaker 0 states that he and Tim Walz are gun owners and are not taking anyone's guns away, and calls for an assault weapons ban, universal background checks, and red flag laws.