reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We need to let the deep state know that we won't accept Joe Biden being sworn in on January 20th. We should gather more people than the recent Washington protest and make a citizen's arrest if necessary. We should also coordinate individual and small group actions to resist. It's important to be prepared for any violence from Antifa or BLM. The government and FBI may not do the right thing unless we make them. We should rally and take to the streets, like the armed resurrection in Athens, Tennessee in 1946. We need to follow a plan and not fight individually. Guerrilla warfare, like the American Indians, may be necessary.

The only thing that matters in this election is keeping Donald Trump and Project 2025 out of power. I genuinely don't care who the Democratic nominee is, be it Biden or Kamala Harris, or someone else entirely. What's crucial is to vote against the party that has embraced white Christian nationalism. The Republican party is gone, replaced by Project 2025 and MAGA. Voting against the "R" is essential at every level of government to prevent them from taking away birth control, education, and historical knowledge, and implementing their white Christian nationalist agenda. Nothing else matters but stopping Trump, the Republican Party, and Project 2025 in November. The only way to stop them is with our votes.

Burn down the current system of electing officials, as it won't fix anything. Most people can't disobey immoral orders, won't act unless it benefits them, and are jerks. The government won't change because it keeps them in power. Target corporations that support corrupt politicians by boycotting them collectively. Protests and letters to officials are ineffective. Hold corporations accountable for underpaying and mistreating workers. Demand warranties on products to prevent scams. By taking down big corporations, we can make a real impact and force change. If you agree, show support and offer to help.

Under Trump, people have mobilized in large numbers to counter the alt-right and reject white supremacist violence. Now, the far right is making a final attempt to back Trump's bid to remain in power through any means necessary. It is crucial for all of us to unite, protect our streets, and dismantle Trumpism along with its neo-Nazi supporters. We must demonstrate that people of all races hold the true power, not the white supremacists.

Republicans represent extremism that threatens the foundations of the republic and are a threat to democracy. They will take rights away, endanger lives, and endanger the planet by not addressing climate change. People need to take to the streets because Trump is a dictator. There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there's unrest in our lives, and a consistent narrative about how dangerous Trump is. Trump is an existential threat to democracy and fundamental freedoms. Some believe that someone will have to put a bullet in Donald Trump. Kamala should stop saying that Trump is a threat to democracy because it's being received as a call to action.

People need to start taking to the streets because this is a dictatorship. There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there's unrest in our lives. The biggest terror threat in this country is white men. They're not going to stop before election day in November, and they're not going to stop after election day. If you think things are bad now, you ain't seen nothing yet. The speaker doesn't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country.

Shutting down a city could be a plan if Biden wins and Trump doesn't concede. If Trump narrowly wins, the strategy might pivot to targeting Democrats to ensure Biden doesn't concede. In DC, identifying Democratic leaders and players is key. Alternatively, if Biden narrowly wins and Trump doesn't concede, the focus shifts to targeting Republicans to pressure Trump to concede. The goal is to think through different scenarios, identify appropriate targets, and determine actions to enable people to organize and prepare.

The only thing that matters in this election is keeping Donald Trump and Project 2025 out of power, and preventing their white Christian nationalist ideology from taking hold. I genuinely don't care who the Democratic nominee is, be it Biden or Kamala Harris, or anyone else, as long as they aren't Trump. The Republican Party is gone, replaced by MAGA and Project 2025. Voting against the Republican party is critical at every level of government. They will take away birth control, education, college opportunities, books, and the real history of this country. The Department of Education will be eliminated. Nothing else matters but stopping Trump, the Republican Party, and Project 2025. You have to vote against the letter R all the way down the ballot. The only way to stop them is with our votes.

People should take to the streets because Trump is a dictator, and there needs to be unrest for as long as there's unrest in people's lives. Protests don't have to be polite and peaceful. Someone should have punched Trump in the face when he called Mexicans rapists. If they were in high school, they'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him. Someone said that actors are still gonna have to put a bullet in Donald Trump, and that's a fact. Another person has thought a lot about blowing up the White House. A Missouri state senator is under investigation by the Secret Service after saying she hopes President Trump is assassinated. If you see anybody from that cabinet, create a crowd, push back on them, and tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere. The domestic enemies to the voting system and the Constitution are at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. They're not gonna stop before or after election day, and they should not.

Silence won't save us; solidarity will. We are not afraid of America facing challenges; this is our moment to ignite change. We aim to unite everyone dissatisfied with Wall Street and establish a new communist party as a tool for the working class to challenge monopoly capitalism. Join our marches and stand with us. We refuse to remain passive and hope for better times in the next four years. Instead, we will confront every challenge and strive to make the U.S. ungovernable.

The speakers discuss a perceived ongoing, multifaceted threat to the United States, tying it to terrorism, political influence, media control, and foreign lobbying. Speaker 0 emphasizes that a hostile group inside the country is attempting to strip Americans of liberties, describing past weather modification and disaster scenarios as intentional acts of terror. They claim a plan to attack Tampa by causing a catastrophic hurricane, which was foiled by doxxing people involved with the operation, including escorts from the US Department of Transportation. They insist that “we are actively being engaged in terrorism and acts of war by a hostile threat that lives among us,” and reject the idea that political changes in Washington reduce these dangers. The speaker asserts that rulers and elites are connected to a web of influence—pharma lobbies, media, and political donors—and contends that many figures in Congress, including APAC-connected individuals, should be exposed by name and faced with accountability. They accuse major pharmaceutical companies and biotech entities of controlling Washington and allege deep, longstanding ties to Israel and global governance structures. They also reference past events to argue that powerful actors have corrupted institutions and policies, including COVID responses, financial bailouts, and foreign influence, and claim that whistleblowing pressure is forcing deals and leadership changes, such as Regeneron’s acquisition moves. Speaker 0 asserts a strategy of direct exposure and intimidation to compel action from elites, insisting, “If you want Trump to have his signals redirected… start dedicating the amount of time that you take for mRNA and what Trump has or has not taken off the market to talking about Duke Country University,” tying local activism to national influence. They claim to know the homes and addresses of various political and corporate figures and urge naming and targeting of these individuals and their families as a means to provoke consequences. They condemn what they describe as a global Jewish-led, “Judeo Bolshevik supremacy” apparatus that they say dominates media, government, and finance, and they contrast this with their view that Western nations should resist such influence. Speaker 1 pushes the idea that fighting the perceived threat requires a similar “warfare” approach, including suppressing media outlets, boycotts, and leveraging “white hats” to prevent infiltration of elections, banking, and networks. They stress that the core battle concerns remaining loyal to a particular political and religious framing, including a discussion of Jesus and Christian theology to frame what they view as moral imperatives in this struggle. The dialogue links religious beliefs to political action, arguing that the enemy uses the “honor of honorable men” and “empathy of empathic people” to wage war, and emphasizes that justice is manipulated to serve said groups. Both speakers critique mainstream politicians and institutions, arguing that current leadership is compromised or controlled by hidden forces. They claim that Trump is not the savior, that many conventional leaders are CIA or part of other hidden systems, and that real change requires public pressure on those they identify as treasonous or genocidal. They dismiss “color commentary” on ideological battles and call for concrete, direct actions by ordinary people to disrupt and deter the actions of the perceived adversaries, while explicitly rejecting violence as a recommended tactic. They advocate exposing names, addresses, and networks of influential figures to create fear of consequences, asserting that such pressure is essential to avert the alleged takeover.

If you choose not to vote or waste your vote because Joe Biden and our democracy aren't perfect, you're ensuring that 2024 will be our last election. Donald Trump has openly expressed his intentions and followed through on banning Muslim people, putting undocumented people in camps, breaking up families, and inciting violence at the Capitol. So, when he talks about throwing political opponents in asylums, building camps, and indicting everyone, believe him. He means what he says.

We are entering a political period with life-altering consequences, demanding unwavering commitment. History shows us mass movements mobilized to protect against fascism and authoritarianism, an era we are now approaching. Donald Trump has suggested deploying the military against US citizens he considers political enemies. Authoritarian regimes often jail political dissidents and legislative opponents. This is the reality we may face.

Donald Trump and the mag of Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. Are they a threat to democracy? Yes. Are they going to take our rights away? Yes. Are they going to put people's lives in danger? Yes. Are they going to endanger the planet by not dealing with climate change? Yes. People need to start taking to the streets. This is a dictator. They're still gonna have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump, and that's a fact. We have to preserve our democracy or speak out against lies and hate. There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there is unrest in our lives. Donald Trump is an existential threat to our democracy and and our most fundamental freedoms. Enough is enough.

The regime is becoming increasingly desperate and dangerous, potentially resorting to false flags or extreme actions against Trump and his allies. Their credibility has diminished significantly since 2016, making it harder for them to manipulate public perception. Despite their weakened state, they remain a threat, and we should be vigilant. The focus should be on winning today’s election and addressing the flaws in the electoral system afterward. Even if Trump wins, a complete overhaul of the voting process is necessary to prevent future issues. The current system is unsustainable and prone to manipulation. It’s crucial to stay informed and engaged as events unfold.

People should take to the streets because Trump is a dictator, and there needs to be unrest. Protests don't have to be polite. Someone should do something about Trump's immigration practices. The biggest terror threat in the country is white men, mostly radicalized to the right. Someone should have punched Trump in the face after he called Mexicans rapists. If they were in high school, they would take him behind the gym and beat him up. Someone said that someone is still gonna have to put a bullet in Donald Trump. Where is John Wilkes Booth when you need him? Someone has thought about blowing up the White House. A Missouri state senator is under investigation by the Secret Service after saying she hopes President Trump is assassinated. If you see anybody from that cabinet, create a crowd and push back on them. The domestic enemies to the voting system are at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. They're not gonna stop before or after election day, and they should not.

We need to be ruthless in exercising power. American conservatives have lost control of major institutions, except for churches. To make real change, we must replace the ruling class. Compromise is unlikely with the current power holders. Overthrowing them is necessary to stop losing.

The U.S. system is based on the slavery period, where the Electoral College elects the president, not the American people. Kamala Harris needs 4 million more votes than Trump to win. Harris will win the popular vote, and black men will be her second-highest percentage voters, behind black women. If Harris wins by 3 million votes but doesn't become president, she will concede, but Trump will not concede if he loses and will try to bring the U.S. to civil war. Even if Harris wins, there needs to be a serious conversation about the state of U.S. democracy. If Trump wins, there will be camps and Project 2025, with potential arrests of figures like Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi. U.S. democracy is more like a Latin American democracy, and everything happening in Brazil and Venezuela can happen here. If Harris doesn't win, there might not be another election.

The discussion centers on a sequence of events and documents that connect pipe-bomb material purchases in 2020 to a high-level, bipartisan war game and contingency planning around the 2020 election, with implications for how the transition away from Trump was imagined by prominent officials. Key facts cited: - Cole purchased pipe-bomb parts in June 2020 in two phases: June 1 and June 8, with additional purchases around June 20 and timers bought on June 3. - The timing aligns with the Transition Integrity Project, a war game exercise organized in June 2020 by Rosa Brooks, a former Obama administration senior official who led the project, and involved figures from both parties including Michael Steele (former head of the Republican National Committee), Donna Brazile (former head of the DNC), and John Podesta (Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager). The participants allegedly included other high-ranking political, military, and intelligence figures from both sides. - The project is described as a bipartisan “war game” that examined how to handle a contested election and to plan for preventing Trump’s inauguration if he won, or managing Trumpism after a loss. The document referenced is a 22-page memo with an annex (appendix C) focusing on “clear Trump win” scenarios and alternatives to ensure a Biden victory or to defeat Trumpism permanently. - The narrative asserts that the Transition Integrity Project produced recommendations for handling a contested election through street protests, electoral strategies, and political pressure, with emphasis on mass mobilization, particularly with Black Lives Matter, to influence outcomes or to force changes in leadership if necessary. - The participants allegedly discussed provocative strategies to destabilize outcomes through street actions, including plans to mobilize protests and to leverage or fund Black Lives Matter and other networks to pressure the political process. They also allegedly discussed concepts such as alternate slates of electors, secession discussions in Western states, and the possibility of arresting Trump and his associates under various circumstances. - The discussion references a sequence of events and media coverage surrounding the 2020 election, including the “Red Mirage Blue Shift” concept (the idea that results might shift after Election Night) and the goal of mitigating perceptions of illegitimacy through censorship measures and strategic messaging. - The speakers connect the June 2020 war game to events around January 6, including the notion that the plan contemplated provoking a breakdown in the joint session of Congress and coordinating demonstrations that could impact the certification process. - The dialogue also ties the Transition Integrity Project to broader discussions about preventing Trumpism from enduring post-election and to “robust, intentional, and specific strategies” to dismantle networks associated with Trump’s rise to power. They discuss the role of mass protests, the potential use of the National Guard, and concerns about preventing or countering demonstrations in the lead-up to and during the certification of the election results. - The conversations reference mainstream outlets (e.g., The New York Times, Molly Ball’s Time Magazine piece) and insist that the Transition Integrity Project’s work was widely discussed and reported, with emphasis on its admission of planning to test receptivity of protests and to coordinate with foundations, corporations, and donor networks to fund and sustain street action if needed. - Throughout, there is an emphasis on not allowing Trump or Trumpism to demobilize automatically after the election and on preparing a comprehensive, multi-front strategy to address a perceived threat to democratic order. Notable participants named or implied include Rosa Brooks; Michael Steele; Donna Brazile; John Podesta; Bill Crystal; David Fromm; and Hillary Clinton’s campaign apparatus. The discussion ties these figures to both the June 2020 pipe-bomb purchases and the broader Transition Integrity Project, framing the war game as a blueprint for how to stop Trump, manage protests, and dismantle the networks that supported Trump’s rise.

Cole notes that he purchased six galvanized pipes of this size on June 1, June 8, and November 16, and asks for receipts. The discussion shifts to what questions a point person in 2021 would face and to a theory of the case, with speculation about how individuals could be drawn into a plan to influence events, including the possibility of a “pipe bomb” plot and manipulation of associates. Speaker 1 explains that, as a federal investigator, one would use a speculative investigative lens to broaden the search to cover various permutations of the case, including the idea that there was a so-called Red Mirage Blue Shift scenario surrounding the 2020 election. They reference CNN’s 2020 reporting on deciphering red mirage and blue shift uncertainty, including pre censorship by DHS/CISA in June 2020 to suppress any social media criticism of mass mail-in ballots, so as to prevent questions about legitimacy of an upcoming Biden victory. The discussion asserts that the goal was to preempt perceptions of illegitimacy and manage the narrative around the election results. The conversation then turns to Rosa Brooks, a high-ranking Obama administration official who headed the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) and wrote about pathways to remove Trump from power. Speaker 1 cites Brooks’ article “Three ways to stop President Trump before the 2020 election” and notes an assertion, reportedly in a Diet of Lisa-like coverage, that she later discussed a fourth, insurrectionary possibility: a military coup. They claim TIP was a war game conducted in June 2020 and then in November 2020, involving senior military, intelligence, diplomatic, and political operatives, with participants from both parties including Michael Steele (former RNC head), Donna Brazile (former DNC head), John Podesta (Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager), Bill Kristol, and others. The summary asserts that TIP’s appendix, “Will Trumpism survive a Trump loss?” warned that Trumpism could persist even after a loss, necessitating a robust strategy to eliminate Trump supporters and networks that enabled Trump’s rise. It is claimed the document discusses how to mobilize mass street protests, especially via Black Lives Matter and allied groups, to pressure a Biden administration to act against Trump, including funding and resource provisioning of protest movements to ensure their alignment with Democratic objectives. The dialogue alleges that, in June 2020, TIP proposed measures to de- legitimize Trump, including not letting Trump use the National Guard or invoke the Insurrection Act to quell protests. It is asserted that the plan contemplated mass demonstrations, the use of “street protests” as decisive leverage, and the establishment of communications infrastructure to support mass mobilization for street action if Trump won, or to counter him if he did not. The participants allegedly favored aligning with groups like Soros-funded Indivisible and Hold the Line, and urged resourcing new racial justice leaders and major philanthropic/foundation channels to fund these movements, including a claimed $50 billion in funding to Black Lives Matter. The transcript claims that TIP’s War Game included explicit scenarios about alternate electors, secession moves, and the potential for mass prosecutions of Trump and his associates, as well as strategic recommendations on how to proceed if Trump refused to concede. It is further asserted that a June 2020 war game considered provoking an “January 6” breakdown in Congress as a central move to prevent a contested inauguration, with participants pondering agent provocateurs and avenues to postpone certification. Throughout, the speakers connect the pipe-bomb purchases in June 2020 to the TIP war games and the broader plan to undermine Trump through street mobilization, legal maneuvers, and potential mass arrests of Trump supporters and networks, while noting the January 6 events as a focal point of these discussions.

If Democrats act like legal scholars, they will lose to Republicans' "guerrilla war" to make Trump president, even if Biden wins legitimately. This is a political, not legal, fight. Congress can take extraordinary, unprecedented actions to stop a coup. On January 3, Democrats could delay seating incoming senators to preserve their majority when the Senate votes to count electoral college votes. This would ensure they can thwart Republican efforts to overturn the will of the people. The Senate votes to seat incoming senators, theoretically. A simple majority of votes should be able to delay seating the incoming senators until after they deal with the county electoral college votes. In the House, the Speaker could order the Sergeant at Arms to remove Mike Pence and the Senate from the House chamber, arguing they can't constitutionally count electoral college votes. These actions would be challenged, but are necessary to counter Republicans overturning the constitutional order. It's about gaining the upper hand legally. We must shift from viewing this as an election to recognizing it as a coup. Members of Congress can organize mass civil disobedience to shut down the capital and delay votes.

We must be ruthless in exercising power. American conservatives have lost control of major institutions. To make real change, we need to replace the ruling class. Compromise is unlikely; overthrowing them may be necessary to avoid continued losses.

If elected, we won't tolerate being killed anymore. We're not afraid to stand up. A race war is looming. People like Trump must go. We may not love Biden, but we have no choice. We must get him in office and then make sure he delivers.

I am here because the only real solution is to drive this regime from power, not in 2026, not in 2028, but right fucking now. Trump must go now. Fascism has momentum and direction. What's happening right here in DC right now is their next leap. Homeless homeless encampments bulldozed, checkpoints in our neighborhoods, an occupying army of masked men with guns roaming the streets, hunting down black youth, dripping with our white supremacy. Trump will not stop as long as he is allowed to remain in power. Donald Trump. Beginning beginning 11/05/2025, Washington DC. Surround the White House. Surround the Capitol. Surround the illegitimate fascist backed supreme court. Across the country, refuse to comply. Grind the machinery of this fascist regime to a halt. Don't stop until Trump is removed. The Trump fascist regime is illegitimate. Fascism is not a looming threat. It is upon us now.

Shut It Down DC discusses their plans for responding to a potential coup and contested election scenarios. They emphasize the need to take action in the streets and disrupt business as usual in Congress. There is talk of revolution and potential violence, with some suggesting breaking windows to enter government buildings. Leaking information to journalists and creating parallel structures are mentioned as tactics. Federal workers are encouraged to engage in noncooperation to undermine those in power. The importance of communication with grassroots groups and sustained organizing is highlighted. Practical examples of slowing down processes and exposing wrongdoing are shared. Overall, the focus is on taking decisive action to resist a potential coup.