reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The January 6th events at the US Capitol are described as disgraceful and a deliberate assault on democracy. Bobby Powell, a retired radio journalist, claims to have video evidence of provocateurs or suspicious actors present at the Capitol. Powell describes witnessing a man removing a window and encouraging others to enter, as well as another man pushing people inside while yelling, "hold the line." He sent the video to the FBI but says the individuals have not been identified. Powell expresses frustration that his evidence and similar findings by attorney Brad Guyer are being ignored by media and politicians. Another speaker claims a group of provocateurs broke away and coordinated the removal of bike racks. They allege that suspicious actors provoked police and removed barriers, creating space for the crowd to enter, suggesting that most people believed they had permission to be there. One speaker claims that the FBI, not Trump supporters, led the insurrection.

Jake Lang describes his experience surrounding January 6 and the aftermath of his detention. - Lang was never sentenced or found guilty of a crime, yet he spent four years and six days in prison. He says the Biden administration canceled the constitution, and asserts the FBI had embedded 274 agents to rile up a peaceful protest into a domestic extreme event to harm President Trump’s 2024 run. - He claims the event was staged to be used against Trump, and that the domestic terrorism frame and Patriot Act were used to suspend constitutional rights, with trials repeatedly kicked off. - Lang states that many detainees, including himself, spent years in solitary confinement without access to bond, having no criminal record. He contrasts this with cashless bail reforms in D.C., Chicago, and New York, where "career criminals" with numerous arrests were released quickly. - He says he was never afforded the same level of justice as those individuals, describing his time as a gulag and saying he prayed and kept faith during incarceration. He was released after 1,467 days to his fiancé Rachel, his father, and thousands of supporters outside the DC gulag. - To cope, Lang joined activities such as push-ups and reading the Bible; he hosted a political prisoner podcast with the Gateway Pundit featuring guests like General Flynn and Dinesh D’Souza, and occasionally appeared on Newsmax to share his story. - He maintained faith that whatever a judge—referred to as “wicked activist judges in DC”—decides would not be his fate, believing a higher plan was in store. - Lang is now running for the U.S. Senate in Florida to take Marco Rubio’s seat. He references a lawsuit alleging that Christopher Wray lied before a congressional panel about having knowledge of undercover agents at the Capitol on January 6; he claims Kash Patel indicated there were 274 agents, an overreach of normal procedures. - He states that the lie led to destroyed families, home raids, gunpoint confrontations, and fear nationwide. He notes red dot gun sights, long periods away from family, and visible dehumanization, including a photo of him with a beard and ponytail during imprisonment. - Lang points to the perceived double standard of justice, noting a Doge staffer who appeared with Elon Musk received a light punishment for assault, while Jan Sixers faced harsher consequences. He closes by highlighting efforts to rebuild lives for Jan Sixers through j6rebuild.com, urging support for those affected. Notes: Lang mentions ongoing activities, his Senate campaign, and calls for support for those impacted by January 6.

Jacob Chansley, a dangerous conspiracy theorist, was sentenced to nearly 4 years in prison for leading the violent insurrection to overthrow American democracy. There is dispute over how he got into the Capitol building, but internal surveillance video reveals that once inside, Capitol Police officers acted as his tour guides. They took him to multiple entrances, tried to open locked doors for him, and never attempted to slow him down. Chansley even thanked the officers in a prayer on the floor of the senate. This starkly contrasts with the reality of his actions on January 6th.

The speaker believes there was a coordinated effort by law enforcement to allow Trump supporters into the Capitol. They mention police officers changing into Trump supporter attire, suggesting FBI involvement. The speaker emphasizes the need for someone familiar with the Capitol to lead the group. They claim Trump supporters inside the Capitol before doors opened were working with FBI agents embedded in the crowd for months. The speaker insists on revealing the truth to the American people. Translation: The speaker suggests a conspiracy involving law enforcement and FBI agents to allow Trump supporters into the Capitol, with some officers changing attire. They stress the importance of insider knowledge to guide the group and claim that embedded FBI agents coordinated with Trump supporters. The speaker is determined to uncover the truth for the American people.

Michael Bird identified himself as a lieutenant for the United States Capitol Police.

John Sullivan, a Black Lives Matter activist, was arrested and charged by the Justice Department for his involvement in the Capitol riot. Sullivan told FBI agents he was present at the Capitol during the riot and entered through a broken window. He stated he was present when an Air Force veteran was shot and killed by a Capitol Police officer while trying to enter the Speaker's Lobby through a window. Sullivan showed agents videos he recorded inside the building, which showed him and others breaking a barricade. He was also recorded encouraging protestors to climb a wall to reach the Capitol entrance and was seen entering the building. Details revealed he was instigating violence while inside the Capitol.

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." "01/06/2021, the media propaganda machine fed us a story that shapes the narrative of insurrection." "They intentionally left out some key details." "There's an entire timeline that you haven't seen and it tells a different story." "They're going into the capital, I think." "It looks like they got sniper rifles." "We want to petition our government for the redress of grievances." "Notice the smoke from the sniper's barrel?" "What do you think that means?" "This is where Joshua Black is shot in the face." "He never saw it coming." "The agitator Landon Copeland admitted to being a member of Antifa just after being sentenced for his involvement." "They're trying to save this guy's life right now."

Speaker 0 expresses intent to storm the Capitol. Speaker 1 discusses Reyes' actions before the Capitol breach. The mob storms the Capitol. Questions arise about Reyes' involvement in inciting the violence. No clear answers are given.

A journalist and Blaze TV contributor will surrender to the authorities next Tuesday, facing criminal charges for his actions during the January 6 incident. This is just the beginning, as more journalists are expected to be charged, some of whom have already fled the country. The situation is expected to worsen by 2024.

A journalist captured video footage at the Capitol showing two suspicious individuals dressed like government agents. One of them encouraged people to break the windows and enter the building. The journalist warned against it, but one of the suspicious individuals was caught on camera pulling out a large pane of glass and quickly dropped it when he realized he was being filmed. He then blamed a protester for breaking the window and even shoved him. Surprisingly, neither of these individuals has been charged for their criminal actions. The video raises questions about why they haven't been held accountable.

The speaker points out a suspicious individual wearing black gear and speculates if they are part of Antifa. They highlight the person's aggressive actions towards the window and questions why they are wearing a wire. The speaker criticizes Democrats for focusing on Trump's role rather than addressing these suspicious incidents. They mention a cop who allowed people into the Capitol and wonders why this hasn't been explained. The speaker also mentions individuals taking selfies with police officers and questions the FBI's handling of information regarding the march. They conclude by expressing frustration with Liz Cheney and Nancy Pelosi for avoiding these questions.

We are at the Capitol building where people have stormed in, breaking the door. They are accusing others of standing with criminals and not protecting journalists or politicians.

A radio journalist in Michigan captured video footage at the Capitol showing two suspicious individuals, possibly government agents, dressed in a way that raised suspicions. One of them encouraged people to break the windows and enter the building. The journalist warned against it, but one of the individuals was caught on camera pulling out a large pane of glass and quickly dropping it when he realized he was being filmed. He then blamed a protester for breaking the window. The person responsible for the damage has not been charged, raising questions about why. Another individual was also seen encouraging people to enter through the window.

A journalist captured video footage at the Capitol showing two suspicious individuals, possibly government agents. One of them encouraged protesters to break the windows and enter the building. The journalist warned against this illegal activity, but one of the suspicious individuals was caught on camera pulling out a large pane of glass. When confronted, the individual blamed the journalist and even threatened him. The identity of this person is unknown, but it is clear that they were committing criminal damage to property. The incident raises questions about why this individual was encouraging others to enter the building.

A person asks John if he was at the Capitol. The person then asks John if he is with Black Lives Matter or right-wing people. John is on the phone during this exchange. The person asks again, "Are you Black Lives Matter?" Someone says John stated on the phone that he is not being charged with anything. The person repeats the question, "Are you Black Lives Matter, John?" John answers, "No."

Today marks the one-year anniversary of the January 6th Capitol Insurrection. I'm reporting live at a reunion of those involved, including FBI agents. One agent reflects on the violence of Trump supporters, describing a terrifying experience while pretending to be one. Plans for the reunion include casual activities like throwing a Frisbee and joking about past actions. I also spoke with Jake, a Trump supporter present during the riot. He claims to have taken orders from Trump, interpreting calls for peaceful protest as encouragement for violence. After being arrested, he manipulated the situation to secure his release, mentioning Kamala Harris's involvement in raising funds for his bail. For more coverage on January 6th, tune into CNN, which will provide ongoing updates. Next, we’ll go live to a ceremony where Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez lays a wreath at her own grave.

A journalist captured video footage at the Capitol showing two suspicious individuals dressed like government agents. One of them encouraged people to break a window and enter the building. The journalist warned against it, but one of the individuals was caught on camera pulling out a large pane of glass before dropping it upon realizing he was being filmed. He then blamed a protester for breaking the window and even threatened him. Surprisingly, the individual responsible for the criminal damage has not been charged. Another person can be heard on the video encouraging others to open the window further.

The transcript centers on a report from NBC News about the man charged with planting two pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican party headquarters on the eve of the January 6th attack. The speaker cites NBC’s article, which states that the suspect told the FBI he believed conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, according to two people familiar with the matter. The speaker notes that NBC provides no direct quote or further context beyond that single claim. The speaker asserts that their own sources indicate the word used by the suspect, Brian Cole Jr., in his FBI interview was that he believed the 2020 election was stolen. However, the speaker claims there is a widespread belief within the FBI that this comment was a legal maneuver rather than a genuine belief. According to the speaker, the FBI allegedly thinks the statement was coached by Cole’s lawyer to secure a pardon from President Trump, specifically a retroactive pardon because Trump had issued a pardon for individuals convicted of January 6–related crimes. The speaker emphasizes that there is no additional evidence in Cole Jr.’s background, as far as their sources can determine, indicating he is a Trump supporter. They remark that NBC is one of the few outlets making this claim, noting that the article contains several paragraphs but only repeats the initial sentence without further detail. The speaker suggests that even within liberal media, there is a belief that the comment was a legal maneuver rather than a reflection of genuine political conviction, and argues that NBC’s reporting is selectively presented to push a particular narrative. Throughout, the speaker contrasts this with a broader media portrayal, arguing that while Brian Cole Jr. did make the comment about the 2020 election being stolen, the context is missing, and the media narrative is being shaped by selective reporting. The speaker frames the situation as an instance of media cherry-picking intended to influence perceptions about the suspect’s political affiliations and the nature of his statements to the FBI, rather than providing a complete account.

An individual provided video footage purportedly showing two federal agents attacking the Capitol on January 6th. A defense attorney for the Oath Keepers filed a motion identifying 80 "suspicious actors" and "material witnesses" present at the Capitol on January 6th who have not been arrested or charged. These individuals were concentrated in areas where trouble occurred, including the East Side and the Columbus doors. The attorney alleges some worked in tactical two-man teams and were later seen on the terrace. He seeks to identify them using facial recognition and questions if the events were staged. A radio journalist captured footage of two individuals he believed to be government agents. One was encouraging people to enter the Capitol after a window had been broken, even pulling out a pane of glass himself. When he realized he was being filmed, he blamed a protester and shoved him. The other individual was holding open the Columbus doors with a wooden pole and pushing people inside. The journalist who shot the video said the man shoved him. One person claims that the FBI, not Trump supporters, led the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6th.

Speaker 1 identified 48 people as antifa at the Capitol, most of them in disguises. They had Trump flags, American flags, and Trump hats to blend in. Some even entered the Capitol, including a Trumpster and a Viking, who were seen with Nancy Pelosi's daughter and her husband. These individuals are professional agitators from Antifa, not Trump supporters. Additionally, there were people with megaphones discussing the invasion of the Capitol.

A group of Antifa individuals, led by a well-known journalist, attempted to incite violence for a TV documentary in Culop. The journalist, connected to mainstream media, was caught communicating with agitators to cause trouble. This coordinated attack on working-class people highlights media bias and manipulation. The public is urged to be aware of these tactics and hold media outlets accountable for their actions.

In a brief, on-the-scene exchange, Speaker 0 asks a woman what happened to her. Speaker 1 responds that she was maced. The conversation reveals that she was attempting to go inside a cafe when the incident occurred: she had made it “like a foot inside,” then was pushed out, and they maced her. Speaker 0 continues by asking for her name and where she is from. In reply, Speaker 1 identifies herself as Elizabeth and states that she is from Knoxville, Tennessee. When asked why she wanted to go inside, Speaker 0 frames the moment by noting the surrounding activity, “We’re storming the Capitol. It’s a revolution. Thank you.” Elizabeth’s answer to the question about her motive is explicit: she says that she and others are involved in actions described as storming the Capitol, and she characterizes the situation as part of a revolution.

The speaker warns that “they have taken control of our society” and urges everyone to stand up, from the White House to every American, insisting that surrender is not an option and that time is running out, with a comparison to the urgency seen in Hong Kong. The speaker claims the attack on the capital was carried out by Antifa but was enabled by political figures—McConnell, Schumer, Pelosi, and the mayor—who allegedly knew it was coming and were lax on security, allowing Antifa to act before the media picked it up. The speaker criticizes media coverage as disgraceful, referencing an affiliation with Fox for almost seventeen years and asserting that Rupert Murdoch and his sons are driving a merge with the rest of the mainstream media. The assertion is made that this consolidation represents a serious, expanding threat. Attention turns to alleged cyber and information warfare, with the speaker mentioning new information about battleground states where cyber warfare was used. The speaker claims that former FBI director James Comey sold HAMR and Scorecard, a top-secret program, to the Chinese. According to the speaker, HAMR is a program that simulates an iPhone-like app inside the voting network, enabling it to be installed and to modulate voting to favor one candidate over another, rather than by a large margin. The speaker recounts a specific telephone claim: on a Tuesday night at 11:30, they were told that the ISI of Pakistan was in the voting machines in Georgia. They say they informed someone about it. The claim is made that, in Georgia, the two candidates Loeffler and Purdue were ahead, but one hour later, they were behind, suggesting a dramatic and rapid shift attributed to external manipulation. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes urgency, global and domestic conspiracies, and the need to act immediately to counter perceived control over society, media, and the electoral process. The narrative ties together political figures, media influence, alleged clandestine cyber tools, and foreign involvement in U.S. voting systems, presenting a cohesive but controversial account of systemic manipulation and imminent danger.

During the Capitol incident, a law enforcement officer recounts being attacked and called a traitor. Another person claims that the officer was actually an FBI plant, not in uniform, and carrying a Confederate flag. They believe the narrative is unraveling and demand the release of FBI files to reveal the true culprits.

Jacob Chansley, a dangerous conspiracy theorist, received a nearly 4-year prison sentence for leading the violent insurrection to overthrow American democracy. There is dispute over how he entered the Capitol building, but internal surveillance videos reveal what happened once he was inside. The footage shows that Capitol Police never stopped Chansley and even acted as his tour guides. They took him to multiple entrances, tried to open locked doors for him, and were within touching distance of him. Chansley saw the police as his allies and thanked them in a prayer on the senate floor. This contrasts with the reality of his actions on January 6th.