reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion highlights the severe issues of sexual abuse and victimization of young girls, particularly within certain cultural contexts. A 13-year-old girl named Scarlett was drugged and abused, yet no perpetrators have been held accountable. There is a concern that authorities fear confronting the Muslim community, influenced by a culture of victim blaming and extremist ideologies. The existence of Sharia law is criticized for its treatment of victims and acceptance of practices like child marriage. Personal experiences of bullying and harassment are shared, illustrating the dangers faced by those outside the dominant culture. The speaker expresses frustration over the lack of support for victims and the silence surrounding these atrocities. Thank you for sharing your insights.

Speaker 0 asks, “Am I a bad person? … the more you didn’t like it, the more I enjoyed it. I loved how much you hated it. Turn me on. Why am I like that?” and questions why. Speaker 1 recounts: during sex, he put his hand on her throat and strangled her until she lost consciousness, but he continued having sex as she came back around. Speaker 0 declares, “I am one of the most dangerous men on this planet. … I’m the smartest person on this planet,” suggesting he’d rather pin her down to make her do things she didn’t like, or that he could do whatever he wants. Speaker 1 notes, the next day one of the whites of her eyes had turned completely red, explaining that lack of oxygen can cause blood vessels to burst, a common feature in domestic abuse cases. Speaker 0 asks if she’s seriously offended that he strangled her a little, noting she didn’t pass out. Speaker 1 says he kept saying, “I own you. You belong to me,” and threatened to kill her. Speaker 0 responds with a dismissive, “Chill the out. Jesus Christ. I thought you were cool.”

Brie, a grooming gang survivor, describes her experience as one of anti-Western religious and racist abuse. She endured multiple rapes, beatings, and torture, all while facing relentless racial insults, being called derogatory names like "white slag" and "white whore." The abuse was compounded by a narrative that portrayed Pakistani girls as pure and virtuous, while white girls were deemed worthless and promiscuous. Brie emphasizes the importance of not hiding this information.

The speaker discusses their personal experiences with human trafficking and sexual abuse, mentioning names like Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Michelle Obama. They claim to have been trafficked to various elite locations, including Buckingham Palace and the Getty Museum, and emphasize the importance of focusing on the people in between the top elites. They mention the complicity of authorities, such as the FBI and local police, in covering up these crimes. The speaker also talks about the existence of underground tunnels and the widespread nature of child trafficking. They mention evidence, including police reports and videos, but express frustration at the lack of action taken. They highlight the connection between human trafficking and other crimes like organ harvesting. The speaker urges for awareness and action to stop these atrocities.

Speaker 1 announces formal charges against Andrew Tate, including rape, human trafficking, the trafficking of minors, and sexual intercourse with a minor. One survivor states she was raped and trafficked regularly at ages 14 and 15 during that period. Speaker 2 describes asking other friends and classmates, ages 15 and 16 at the time, who also received messages, noting it was a well-known fact that Tate had a network of young girls. Speaker 3 explains a six-year relationship with Vivian, who is now 21; they met when Vivian was 15. He describes a pattern similar to those seen in other cases, where abusers use a boyfriend model of exploitation to lure victims, a form of human trafficking also known as the lover method. He is accused of using this method, stating: “My MO was find girls, make them love me and make them work for me. And that's how I got rich.” Speaker 1 recounts that while her abusers threatened, raped, and violated her, they were also kind. Speaker 3 discusses the mechanics of exploitation, asserting that you cannot run this business through fear. He explains that manipulating fear is ineffective because if you could scare a girl and put her on the street, she would leave and never return. He emphasizes that a pimp’s power comes from the girl’s respect and love, not fear: “They have to respect you and love you.” Speaker 0 offers a summation of the day’s session: the judge stated that it is likely these girls will never recover from the abuse they suffered, and remarked that the way the perpetrator treated them defies understanding. Speaker 3 adds a chilling statement reflecting the dynamics of the abuse: “The more you didn't like it, the more I enjoyed it. I loved how much you hated it. Turn me on.”

A speaker described a violent attack on a train in which a woman named Irina (also rendered as Irena in the transcript) was fatally slashed through the neck and body with a knife. The speaker emphasized that there were people on the train and highlighted Irina’s expression of terror in the final moments of her life, noting that she died instantly after the attack. The narrative asserts that Irina had escaped a brutal war and was slain in America by a hardened criminal who had been released to kill because of no cash bail. The speaker linked the perpetrator’s release to open borders, stating that the attacker came in through open borders. The mother of the victim, Missus Zaretska, is cited as saying she would ensure justice for her magnificent daughter, Irina, with a rhetorical question about how anyone can stand. The speaker asks Congress to take action, though the sentence is left unfinished in the transcript with “I'm asking this congress to.” The passage frames the incident as an example of dangerous parole practices and border policy, aiming to advocate for policy changes and accountability to prevent similar tragedies.

Brie, a grooming gang survivor, describes her experience as one of anti-Western religious and racist abuse. She endured multiple rapes, beatings, and torture, all while facing relentless racial insults, being called derogatory names like "white slag" and "whore." She highlights the stark contrast in perceptions of women, noting that Pakistani girls are viewed as pure and virtuous, while white girls are seen as worthless and promiscuous. Brie emphasizes the importance of not hiding this information.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 recounts feedback from “real Chicagoans,” describing them as mostly Black and Brown, and claims they tell him that the other person does not seem to know the difference between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens. He asserts that these individuals feel the other person is siding with illegal aliens over their communities. He then pivots to a direct line of questioning. The real question, as Speaker 0 presents it, concerns a violent incident: “An illegal alien from Nicaragua grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her.” He presses for a direct response about what would have happened “if that had been your wife, Stacy.” He stages the hypothetical to elicit a clear stance from Speaker 1 on how to respond to such a crime and its immigration context. Speaker 1, however, interrupts to steer the conversation away from the loaded scenario. He repeatedly signals a move on, indicating a preference not to engage with the hypothetical or to answer the pointed ethical dilemma on the spot. The back-and-forth centers on the tactic of addressing the question versus avoiding it, with Speaker 0 insisting on a straightforward answer “as a man, not as mayor, but as a man.” The exchange escalates as Speaker 0 urges Speaker 1 to provide a simple yes or no and to address the issue directly, effectively challenging Speaker 1 to commit to a position regarding ICE and deportation in light of the described crime. Speaker 1 responds by again stating to move on, resisting the direct yes/no framework. Throughout, Speaker 0 persists in pressing for a candid, personal response to the hypothetical crime and its immigration implications, while Speaker 1 maintains a boundary about continuing the discussion in that moment. Ultimately, Speaker 1 declines to answer the specific deportation question in the moment, and Speaker 0 reaffirms the demand for a direct personal answer. The segment ends with Speaker 1 thanking the audience and moving on, leaving the explicit yes-or-no question unresolved in this exchange.

The conversation centers on a trafficking operation involving sexual exploitation of very young children, with several details about how the system works, who’s involved, and what happens to the victims. - Meeting and control: The trafficker had been contacting the speaker by phone that night to arrange in-person dialogue, with intermediaries making intentions unclear. The trafficker repeatedly changed the meeting time, and final directions were given about 30 minutes before the interview. The speakers emphasize the danger and precarity of contact through intermediaries. - Terminology and targets: The trafficker uses specific terms: “merchandise” for boys and “dolly” for girls. A 10-year-old boy is considered too old for certain purposes; a three- or four-year-old child is described as preferred for sexual activities, with graphic details about age and activities. - Routine and condition of the children: The sexual abuse is described as a long, sustained event, sometimes lasting many hours, with no regular breaks solely due to clients. If one child tires, another is used. Children are given nourishment, vitamins, and sometimes IV drips or injections to keep them functioning and appearing healthy. The day-to-day abuse is described as a form of “breeding” and “recycling,” with children being kept alive for ongoing use until they are no longer deemed useful. - Medical and protective care: Women who look after the children are described as “aunties,” with some cruel behavior (e.g., pulling hair). Some care is provided to keep the children functional, though the environment is described as perverse and coercive, with children initially unresponsive even to their own names. - Locations and scale: The speaker knows of about four brothels in Europe, located in Belgium, Germany, and Poland, including one in Tri City, Poland, described as a regular house. The sexual activity occurs before organs are removed, implying preparation for transplantation. - Financials and exploitation: The price for the full set of services is described as around half a million euros, with the understanding that the child becomes “useless” after that. Younger children (including four-year-olds) are kept for ongoing exploitation, while older children (six or eight and up) are used for regular sex before disposal. - Disposal and the dark net: After children reach about 14, they are disposed of or sent elsewhere; in some cases, they are photographed or filmed for sharing on the dark net. There are mentions of “VIP entertainment” and extreme sexual violence, including suffocation as a common fantasy and other brutal acts. - Perpetrators and beliefs: The traffickers are described as part of a sect with satanic elements, greeting each other with two specific words and possessing a pentagram, sometimes found under inscriptions. They are depicted as controlling and predatory, with some perpetrators showing a chilling level of premeditation and ritualism. - Real-life case: A mother is pressured over eighteen months to dispose of her child for cash, ultimately selling a four- or five-year-old for about €10,000, believing the child would be adopted abroad, but it was diverted for spare parts.

I never met or saw the woman in question. The incident at Burgdorf's dressing room involved me bursting in while she tried on lingerie. Her pet's name, "vagina," was not allowed in court. The word "rape" has sexual connotations, but this was not sexual, just hurtful. Many associate rape with being sexy, but it's not. Let's pause. The conversation turns to fantasies and plans to go shopping with the money.

The speaker describes a sequence of events starting with entering through a small door, then going up some stairs, and entering a room. Inside, there was an attempt to make the speaker lower their pants, described as “intentaron que me bajara los pantalones,” and a reference to someone being “arrested por el culo,” which the speaker preserves as the exact phrasing from the transcript. The narrative then shifts to a question directed at Mariela, asking for her belief about whether “they” would have been dead, with the speaker prompting Mariela: “¿Que estarían muertas?” and continuing, “¿Tú qué crees? ¿Que estarían muertas?” The text captures a moment of speculation about a possible outcome, though the speaker does not specify who would be dead or the context of that hypothetical. Following this portion, the speaker introduces a named individual: “Este señor, Este señor, que se llama Bernard Alapetite,” and states that this person “también abusó de mí sexualmente.” The structure indicates a firsthand confession of sexual abuse by the named individual, Bernard Alapetite, with the speaker asserting that this person “también abusó de mí sexualmente.” Key points emphasized by the speaker include: - A sequence of entering a space through a small door, ascending stairs, and entering a room. - An attempted act of coercion involving forcing the speaker to lower their pants. - A phrase indicating someone was “arrested por el culo,” preserving the original wording for emphasis and accuracy. - An interjected inquiry directed at Mariela about whether certain people would have been dead, highlighting a moment of speculation about a potential outcome. - A direct assertion naming Bernard Alapetite as someone who “también abusó de mí sexualmente,” indicating multiple violations by that individual. The transcript presents these events as part of a personal account, with the speaker naming the alleged perpetrator and recounting a coercive incident and a subsequent admission of sexual abuse by the same person.

The speaker describes a family history of alleged ritualistic abuse and satanic practices, stating: “Also in worshiping the devil, participated in human sacrifice rituals rituals and cannibalism.” They assert an extensive family tree, claiming it “has gone back to, like, 1,700.” They contrast the outward appearance of their family with the reality inside, saying: “Does everyone else think it's a nice Jewish family? From the outside, appear to be a nice Jewish girl? Definitely. And you all are worshiping the devil inside the home? Right.” The speaker references broader involvement beyond their own family, noting: “There's other Jewish families across the country, not just my own family.” They describe rituals in which babies would be sacrificed and claim, “Who’s babies? There were people who bred babies in our family. No one would know about it. A lot of people were overweight, so you couldn't tell if they were pregnant or not.” They recount a childhood experience in which they were forced to participate: “When I was very young, I was forced to participate in that in which I had to sacrifice an infant. And the the purpose of sacrifice is to what? Is to bring you what? What are you sacrificing for? For power.” The response given to the question about the purpose of sacrifice is: “Power.” The speaker also discloses personal abuse within the narrative, stating: “Mhmm. I was molested. I was raped several times.” They then describe their mother’s current life and public image, asserting: “And what's your mother doing? She lives in the Chicago Metropolitan Area. She's on the Human Relations Commission of the town that she lives in, and she's an upstanding citizen. Nobody would suspect her.”

I walked into a house and saw a woman brutally abused, with nails and objects in her female organs. Her body was unrecognizable due to the abuse from head to toe.

Young girls in South Wales have reportedly been recruited by grooming gangs, leading to horrific abuse and trafficking. One victim recounted being threatened and assaulted multiple times. In response, there was a call for a respectful discussion about these serious issues. The conversation shifted to the need for a Wales-wide inquiry into child sexual exploitation, especially given the public concern and the lack of assurances from leadership. The urgency of addressing these matters was emphasized, with a clear request for accountability and action to prevent similar situations as seen in Rotherham and Rochdale.

A woman who has been involved in trafficking for many years discusses the disturbing shift in the industry. Previously, traffickers would force girls to have abortions, but now they deliberately impregnate them to provide babies for the trafficking world. These babies often do not survive long, as they are starved and subjected to horrific abuse. Technology companies, like Ericsson, have connected evil individuals and facilitated live rapes online. Governments have the power to stop this, but choose not to. There is a genre of sadistic pornography that focuses on hurting children and trafficking victims. These acts are real and based on firsthand accounts. The individuals involved in these crimes are considered wicked, as they aim to inflict pain on God's creation.

Speaker 0 recalls, "I saw horror" in captivity and "I still have nightmares, bad nightmares." "Can't horror. That's I can't why I left Nigeria. That's why I'm here." They state that "we've been in captivity and been raped multiple times by terrorists" and that most people "would not know the pain." "Nobody stood. Nobody believed me. Nobody said anything. Nobody helped me." Speaker 1 adds, "No one. No one." and warns that "that's what's happening right now to our children. They're getting killed." They describe ongoing suffering: "Somebody's bleeding. Nobody's saying anything. Nobody's accepting any refugee from Northern Nigeria. Nobody." "I was raped." and "I still have munch on my arm." The speaker concludes, "I know what's going on. I know the pain."

Young girls in South Wales have reportedly been recruited by grooming gangs, leading to horrific experiences, including gang rape and trafficking. One victim described being threatened and assaulted multiple times. In response, there is a call for a Wales-wide inquiry into child sexual exploitation by these gangs. However, there is concern about the language used in discussing these sensitive topics, with a request to avoid overly graphic descriptions that could incite discrimination. Despite the serious nature of the allegations and public concern, there is resistance to a UK-wide inquiry, prompting the need for a focused investigation in Wales to address these issues effectively.

Former Labour adviser Scarlett Maguire and political commentator Amon Bogle discuss front-page claims about the grooming inquiry, framing it as sabotage by Labour and a government-controlled process. - Speaker 1 (Amon Bogle) says the Telegraph front page alleges the grooming inquiry was sabotaged by Labour, and argues the inquiry from the outset was a follow-up of a cover-up spanning three decades, noting Labour initially refused a national inquiry. He asserts the government is manipulating the inquiry by refusing victims and survivors the chance to name perpetrators as Pakistanis, and by preventing examination of religious aspects of the abuse. - Speaker 2 (Scarlett Maguire) contends the issue is not an “Asian grooming gangs” problem but a Pakistani problem in the UK, with the vast majority of perpetrators from Mirpur in Pakistan. She says two women removed themselves from the inquiry because they were being silenced by the government from looking into race. - Speaker 0 (host) remarks on the broader fear of addressing the issue, recounting community knowledge of grooming in shops, gyms, and corner shops, and says he knows the abuse continues and no one is doing anything about it. - Speaker 2 adds that the country has been too scared to discuss the perpetrators, noting that police, social workers, and care workers were afraid of being labeled racist if they spoke out. - Speaker 3 (another participant) notes that there were conflated timelines and that early on, victims faced police or social workers who could be perceived as perpetrators in some cases. He mentions Kirsty Dahmer as the person who first brought grooming cases to court and reopened cases that had been closed, stressing the difficulty of running any inquiry that listens to all parties. - Speaker 3 emphasizes the challenge of conducting an inquiry where social workers and police are involved, and argues that victims and vulnerable young women in care were abused by social workers, the men who did it, and later by the police. He underlines the horrific nature of these events and notes that what happened is still happening today. - The discussion notes the ongoing impact on young women in care, with a final, emotive remark that reading a certain girl’s book would break one’s heart, signaling the lasting harm and urgency of the issue.

The speaker, identified as a victim, says they did not feel like a victim and were not "thrown on the ground and ravished," though rape carries many sexual connotations. They specify that this was not sexual for them; it just hurt. They add, "Most people think of rape as a violent assault." The speaker counters with, "Is not I think most people think of rape as being sexy." A short break is called: "Let's take a short break," with "Think of the fantasies" and "We've got to take a quick break. You can stick around, we'll talk more on the other side." The other person notes, "You're fascinating to talk to."

I experienced severe abuse, including threats, rape, and violence, often from those who pretended to be kind. We were derogatorily labeled as "gory girls" and "white slags." My police records reveal 200 to 300 pages detailing the abuse, including strangulation, knife threats, and an attempted arson on my home. I was raped over a thousand times, and countless men assaulted me. This was a grim reality for us, and although it sounds unbelievable, it felt normal. It was all we knew.

I didn't think I was just going to be killed; I expected other things to happen to me as well. So, you believed you might also be raped? Yes, I did. And now you understand that this fear stems from your experience? Yes, I think so.

Mary Morgan Ariel, who goes by Morgan Ariel on X, claims that Josh Hammer is now calling for Candace to be involuntarily committed to a mental institution. A clip is presented to illustrate this pattern, followed by the assertion that others are calling for people to be put in mental institutions. The text then references a statement: “In a in a just society, she'd be in a mental ward right now. She would have been in an immense award a while ago. I personally am a big proponent to bringing back the involuntary commitment laws of nineteen sixties. In my view, she should be involuntarily committed to a mental asylum.” This is linked to parallels drawn with how Epstein victims were treated. The narrative moves to 2001, focusing on Karen Mulder, one of the most sought-after models at the time, who on a talk show frantically names people who assaulted her or sold her to be assaulted, including royalty, politicians, cops, and her own family. Before finishing, she is taken off the stage and eventually put into a psych ward funded by Gerald Marie, the agent and owner of Elite Paris, who signed her at 15. Marie would later be prosecuted for rape and sexual assault claims, but the case was closed in 2023 due to France’s statute of limitations, which could have been avoided if her reports had been treated seriously. The account continues with Jean Luc Brunel, an Epstein associate who was jailed on suspicion of rape and trafficking of minors and was found dead in his cell in 2022. After Mulder’s 2001 interview, numerous publications claimed she was going through a psychotic episode. Her parents publicly blamed drugs, and her sister Saskia appeared on the same talk show to discredit her, suggesting Saskia was also a victim. The media and tabloids labeled Mulder crazy, and she attempted suicide in 2002. She later returned to confront the host, who pulled her from air and deleted the tape, erasing the video of her truth. This information is inferred from tabloid testimonies, Mulder’s accounts, and audience members. The narrative notes that a TikTok commenter, a female influencer with many followers, described human trafficking as “the new satanic pan,” a statement the speaker found disturbing. The speaker emphasizes that the story behind Epstein is not satanic panic, but real, and expresses concern that the desensitization to Epstein files is growing as a conclusion is not reached. The speaker asserts that victims have become perpetrators, highlighting the severity of the issue. Karen Mulder is described as 55 years old now and still a person in this world, with the sole mistake being not doing that 2001 interview on live television.

There has been a noticeable shift in human trafficking, where traffickers no longer force girls to have abortions but instead encourage them to get pregnant. I spoke to a woman who has been involved in trafficking for many years, and she shared horrifying stories of young girls being repeatedly raped and impregnated. These babies often do not survive for long, as they are starved and subjected to unimaginable abuse. Technology companies, like Ericsson, have connected evil individuals and enable live rapes to be streamed online. Governments have the power to stop this, but choose not to. There is even a genre of sadistic pornography that focuses on hurting children and trafficking victims. These are not rumors, but real atrocities.

Speaker 0 was alarmed to see the MSM, either CNN or MSNBC, defining a certain action as reparations and stating, "This is what reparations means." Speaker 1 stated that certain people should experience being in a farm in the middle of the night when someone comes for them, gang rape, and witnessing the torture and death of a loved one before reparations can be discussed. Speaker 1 does not recommend gang rape, based on personal experience.