reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims American healthcare ignores metabolic dysfunction and its causes. They state they learned virtually nothing in medical school about environmental factors impacting health, such as the link between ultra-processed food and early mortality, or the harm shown in independently funded studies of processed foods. They assert conflicts of interest exist within the USDA food guidelines and that synthetic pesticides are linked to various health issues. They claim microplastics are accumulating in our bodies, and numerous toxins in our environment alter gene expression and disrupt hormones. Heavy metals in food and medications are allegedly neurotoxic. The speaker notes Americans walk too little and that medical errors are a leading cause of death. They claim sleep deprivation can induce prediabetes and that children spend less time outdoors than prisoners. They allege professional organizations take money from companies like Coke and Moderna. Addressing these root causes could reverse chronic disease. The speaker concludes this is a spiritual crisis, requiring a renewed respect for life and nature.

My name is Gwen Olsen, a former pharmaceutical industry veteran. The industry focuses on maintaining diseases, not curing them. Psychiatric drugs keep patients reliant on medications for life. Many drugs are no more effective than placebos, with exercise often proving more beneficial. The pharmaceutical industry prioritizes profit over patient well-being, pushing unnecessary medications. It's crucial to educate yourself on alternative health options to avoid becoming a lifelong pharmaceutical customer. Take charge of your health, share knowledge, and prevent loved ones from falling victim to unnecessary medications. Thank you. Translation: The speaker, Gwen Olsen, discusses the pharmaceutical industry's focus on maintaining diseases rather than curing them, highlighting the ineffectiveness of many drugs and the importance of educating oneself on alternative health options.

Speaker 0 argues that the food supply is treated with a chemical called folic acid, which is not a natural vitamin and did not exist until the 1980s. According to the speaker, folic acid is not found anywhere on the surface of the earth, whereas folate does exist in nature. The speaker notes that during pregnancy, women are told to take high doses of folic acid, and questions why a man-made chemical that didn’t exist until the eighties is deemed absolutely necessary for a healthy pregnancy. The comparison is made between folate and methylfolate, implying a distinction between natural forms and synthetic forms. The speaker also states that in the United States, the entire grain supply—flour, rice, bread, pasta, grains of any kind, and cereals—is required to be sprayed with folic acid, although this is not openly labeled as such. Instead, it is described as fortified or enriched foods. The speaker claims that these fortified or enriched nutrients are fed to children, and asserts that half of the population has a gene mutation that prevents them from processing folic acid effectively. The consequence, according to the speaker, is that when a person cannot process a high amount of something introduced into the body, it becomes dysfunctional. The speaker then connects this to a broader societal issue, describing a common scenario: a child goes to school, comes home with a phone call reporting inattention and poor ability to follow directions, and the ensuing medical response is the prescription of stimulants such as Adderall or Ritalin. The speaker characterizes this as a solution that uses amphetamines to accelerate the central nervous system to match the pace of a racing mind, rather than addressing underlying factors. Ultimately, the speaker presents a proposed solution: remove folic acid, fortified, and enriched nutrients from the diet, and observe changes in behavior. The underlying claim is that eliminating these synthetic nutrients would calm behavior and improve function, implying that the current approach relies on artificial chemistry rather than natural nutrition.

The speaker explains that the body has a natural ability to heal itself if given the right conditions. They argue that the body requires 90 essential nutrients, including minerals, vitamins, amino acids, and fatty acids, in order to function properly. However, modern agricultural methods and the overuse of pesticides have led to a decrease in the nutritional content of food. As a result, the body's reserves are depleted, leading to various health issues. The speaker criticizes allopathic medicine for focusing on managing symptoms with drugs rather than addressing the root cause. They claim that this approach often leads to a cycle of worsening health, multiple medications, and eventually, death. The speaker concludes by criticizing the medical system for failing patients and suggests that alternative holistic approaches may be more effective.

The speaker discusses GLP-1 hormones and GLP-1 drugs, naming Ozempic and its sister drug Wegovy, made by Novo Nordisk in Denmark. The speaker says Novo Nordisk has made “two point two one trillion dollars” on Ozempic and Wegovy and that America buys “ninety percent of it,” attributing this to being “the most overweight.” The speaker claims that “there’s no GLP-1 anything in Ozempic or Wegovy,” and says the only substance inside is “Exendin-4” (spelled “E X E N D I N dash four”). The speaker states that Exendin-4 is a protein isolated from the venom of a Gila monster lizard living in the southwestern United States deserts, and that venom protein research on the Gila monster began in 1956, referencing a medical textbook titled “Venoms” from 1956. The speaker says the Gila monster venom protein paralyzes the vagal nerve and “paralyz[es] the stomach sphincter” that empties food into the intestines. The speaker claims this makes people “not be hungry for hours” because food “isn’t going into your intestines to be broken down,” and therefore isn’t turned into fecal matter and nutrients for absorption into the bloodstream. The speaker further claims that because people self-inject Ozempic or Wegovy once a week for the rest of their lives, Exendin-4 circulates through the bloodstream and “touch[es]” L-cells, which release GLP-1 hormone. The speaker claims that the toxicity of Gila monster venom has been discussed in media as being “as toxic and deadly as” western diamondback rattlesnake venom, and asserts that millions of Americans are injecting it. The speaker also says Exendin-4 has an FDA “black box warning” stating that self-injecting for twelve to thirty-six months “trip[les] your risk of developing thyroid cancer,” specifically “medullary thyroid cancers,” and that “there are multiple of them.” The speaker says oncologists reported not seeing thyroid cancers “exploding” in Ozempic and Wegovy users, but instead reported “explosions of breast cancer diagnosis” within a year or two after starting. The speaker also claims Exendin-4 is published to cause “nerve growth factor and epidermal growth factor,” described as cancer-related terms for tumor growth in the brain and organs. The speaker further claims that “one in five” will develop “diabetic ret-retinopathy,” causing permanent blindness, and references a People magazine article titled “People on Ozempic are now reporting eye rotting disease.” The speaker says venom “destroys human tissue” and calls Ozempic and Wegovy “venom,” not a cure. The speaker asks people who are losing weight whether they believe they were overweight, diabetic, and had heart disease due to “Hela monster venom deficient,” and asks why they would inject it if they do not believe that. The speaker says medical doctors are unaware of this and describes sending research and mainstream articles; the speaker claims doctors responded in unison that they would not prescribe it again and that they would tell their patients to stop.

The speaker argues that ivermectin is part of a “diabolical plan” attributed to the Rockefeller organization. They claim the plan was organized in 2010 and that the Rockefellers “knew that people aren’t going to take vaccines after 2020,” so “they’ll take a different pharmaceutical product.” They contrast this with the claim that ivermectin is “safe,” saying that looking at reported side effects—including blindness, liver failure, infertility, and “all types of horrible things”—raises the question of how it could be safe. They also say that when people claim they purchased ivermectin from a different country, this does not matter because “Rockefellers, their medical system, they own the entire medical system across the world.” The speaker describes this as a “quite a plan,” and connects it to the “alternative health push,” stating that on platforms like Rumble there are ads for ivermectin and that marketing pharmaceuticals on an alternative health platform is used as a reason to “wonder” why it is being promoted. The speaker further claims that alternative health discussions about “parasites” are actually “just heavy metal overload,” and that ivermectin “has heavy metals inside of it.” They state that people interpret symptom improvement from ivermectin as proof it “fixed” them, and they frame this as similar to antibiotics that suppress symptoms. They then describe a broader industry framing: they say alternative health promotions and podcasts helped grow ivermectin into “a 32 billion dollar industry.” They also assert that the companies producing ivermectin include the same major pharmaceutical corporations said to make vaccines in 2020. The speaker says that when they looked up who makes ivermectin, they found Merck, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, and Bayer, and they argue this shows that “the pharmaceutical companies who are making the vaccines in 2020 are the same ones making the ivermectin,” calling it a “bait and switch.” The speaker characterizes the overall strategy as one in which Rockefellers allegedly assume people will not put a vaccine in their body, yet “will still put pharmaceuticals into your body.” They also reference ingredients they claim to have found in ivermectin formulations, including polysorbate 80 “which… breaks down the whole blood brain barrier,” GMO cornstarch, maltodextrin, artificial flavors, hexane, and glycols, describing them as “petroleum based things.” Finally, they dispute the argument that ivermectin “came from nature,” saying it “came from a golf course in Japan,” and stating that golf courses are sprayed with pesticides, so the substance was “toxic” and was then “resold… to the people as it came from nature.”

The speaker states they will never consult a doctor about general health again, believing doctors are ignorant and only prescribe medication. They claim doctors don't understand human biology and only focus on prescribing medicine for every ailment, leading to multiple medications with numerous side effects. The speaker reports being previously prescribed medication for thyroid issues, high cholesterol, and high blood pressure. They are now on no medication, and their blood work is better than ever. The speaker feels significantly improved and believes they saved their own life.

The speaker criticizes the American Diabetic Association's dietary guidelines, suggesting that they can lead to diabetes. They mention specific recommendations for a type 2 diabetic, such as orange juice, oatmeal with sugar and honey, and yogurt with fruit, all of which contain high amounts of sugar. The speaker also mentions that Pfizer paid a large sum of money for Arena Pharmaceuticals, which supposedly fixes certain health issues caused by vaccine injuries. They conclude by stating that we should trust in God and believe that we have everything we need to thrive.

The speaker suggests that the medical field is controlled by big pharmaceutical companies, whom they compare to a mafia. They claim that these companies create medications that have harmful side effects and keep people dependent on doctors. The speaker also believes that the more one relies on medical treatments, the sicker they become. They mention chemotherapy as a lucrative treatment, but assert that there is a cure for cancer, which they attribute to God.

Only two countries worldwide allow pharmaceutical TV ads, including the U.S., where over a billion dollars monthly is spent. These ads convey that Americans frequently experience bowel and bladder issues, active seniors enjoy tennis and sex, and pills can solve any problem, even pill overuse. The speaker questions the need to suggest medications to doctors and highlights the growth of ketamine clinics in America. Western medicine, it's argued, treats respectable drugs differently from street drugs, despite similarities. Oxycodone is heroin, Adderall is meth, and Ritalin is cocaine for kids. Ketamine, once an illegal club drug, was FDA-approved as an anesthetic. The speaker suggests the first drug one uses is the gateway drug, be it beer, pot, or pharmaceuticals prescribed to children. Resisting profitable but harmful substances requires individual effort.

The speaker explains that the body has a natural ability to heal itself if given the right conditions. They argue that the body requires 90 essential nutrients, including minerals, vitamins, amino acids, and fatty acids, in order to function properly. However, modern agricultural methods and the overuse of pesticides have led to a decrease in the nutritional content of food. As a result, the body's reserves are depleted, leading to various health issues. The speaker criticizes allopathic medicine for focusing on managing symptoms with drugs rather than addressing the root cause. They claim that this approach often leads to a cycle of worsening health, multiple medications, and eventually, death. The speaker concludes by criticizing the medical system and suggests that alternative approaches should be considered.

The speakers discuss the potential effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Speaker 1 explains that the idea of DNA fragments and reverse transcription in vaccines is a distinct possibility proven in vitro (in the laboratory) but not as solidly established in real-life humans. He says the machinery exists to reverse transcribe the synthetic mRNA in “these gene products” but notes skepticism about certain public figures and officials who allegedly ignored earlier communications. He cites Denis Rancourt’s data, claiming the vaccine has killed 17 million people and that the injury-to-kill ratio is 34.4. He translates this to global totals of 602 million injured or killed, with approximately 700,000 Americans killed and 2.5 million injured in the United States, describing this as an unprecedented injury-to-kill ratio in medicine and military contexts. He asserts that deadly gene products should have been removed from the market and from Florida two years ago. Speaker 0 asks whether Latipo was alerted two years ago and whether he ignored the warnings. Speaker 1 confirms that Latipo, Ashley Moody, and DeSantis did not respond to communications over the past two years, but notes that Latipo is now taking some action. The conversation shifts to how people can respond health-wise. Speaker 1 contends that health care systems and governments are corrupt, claiming the government has spent trillions of dollars to capture healthcare systems and push dangerous narratives. He urges listeners to leave the conventional healthcare system, describing it as corrupt and implying that healthcare professionals are silenced or fired for speaking out. He promotes an alternative health approach through a parallel system and mentions an emergency medical kit intended to address multiple dangerous diseases and scenarios, asserting that timely access to certain drugs is limited through ordinary medical channels. Throughout, Speaker 1 emphasizes drastic distrust of mainstream medical and governmental institutions, urging viewers to seek alternative health solutions and to prepare for potential health crises. He repeats that the traditional healthcare system is compromised and advocates a shift toward a different healthcare approach and emergency preparedness, including access to medications outside standard channels.

Speaker 0 argues that “health cannot come through a needle,” stating that injecting “a virus, a particle of a bacteria, and a bunch of chemicals” cannot be a basis for staying healthy. They compare this to claiming that taking “seven different types of prescription medications” makes a person healthy, adding that “health in the presence of pharmaceuticals is an oxymoron.” They describe encountering patients who report coming in for knee pain while saying they are otherwise “perfectly healthy,” yet they are taking multiple medications, including treatments for high blood pressure, cholesterol, reflux/GERD, headaches, and a diuretic. Speaker 0 says “symptom-free in the presence of drugs is not health,” emphasizing that health “absolutely cannot go through a needle” and calling it “an inside-out phenomenon.” Speaker 0 then outlines what they believe produces health: taking care of the “terrain,” keeping the gut healthy, getting adequate nutrition, getting plenty of sleep, getting a lot of sunshine for vitamin D, and getting children “outside” for exercise. They claim, “You don’t need to be vaccinated.” They also express criticism of entrusting a child’s health to someone else, saying they do not understand “the abdication” of a “precious little package” to “another human who happens to wear a white coat and have a title of pediatrician,” describing it as misplaced trust “that they know best.”

The speaker discusses the book The MD Emperor Has No Clothes by Peter Glidden, describing it as a phenomenal resource. They assert that when patients receive a cancer diagnosis and undergo a PCR test, they are then told they must undergo chemotherapy or radiation. According to the speaker, in the book Peter Glidden explains that the professional receives a 6% commission for recommending chemotherapy. They claim this leads to about $100,000 being charged to the patient’s insurance, which the speaker views as a significant incentive for doctors to push chemo and radiation. The speaker contends that professionals tell patients to pursue chemo and radiation largely because of the commission from Big Pharma, rather than offering alternatives or focusing on overall health. They allege that doctors do not inform patients about natural or alternative options, listing items such as soursop, sun exposure, reishi, apricot seeds, and dietary corrections as potential aids that could address the body’s signals for help. The implication is that the medical system prioritizes medication and procedures over nutritional or lifestyle approaches. A central claim echoed in the talk is that the medical system in the United States is financially driven: 20% of the country’s GDP is spent on healthcare. The speaker emphasizes “20% of the GDP of America” to illustrate how the system operates financially, suggesting that this economic framework contributes to the continued use of vaccines, chemotherapy, radiation, “poisonous pills,” and misdiagnoses. They argue that these financial incentives are why certain treatments persist, and why systemic changes are unlikely within the current framework. Overall, the speaker asserts that the U.S. medical system is a money-driven enterprise, with substantial financial incentives tied to specific treatments like chemotherapy, which are presented as standard responses to cancer diagnoses. The discussion centers on challenging the mainstream approach by highlighting alleged commissions, insurance costs, and the availability of alternative health information and practices that they claim are typically overlooked.

The speaker suggests that pharmaceutical companies want people to continuously take vaccines, even as they become sicker. They claim that these companies also acquire drugs to treat the injuries caused by the vaccines. For example, before rolling out COVID-19 vaccines for children, one of the companies acquired drugs to treat blood clots in children, which they believe the vaccines may cause. The speaker also mentions a large acquisition by Pfizer for novel cancer treatments, implying that they will cause the cancers they treat. The speaker concludes that pharmaceutical companies want people to be sick and dependent on their medications.

The speaker discusses iron imbalances labeled as anemia, asserting it is a copper imbalance, and critiques the conventional emphasis on iron supplements, noting they can cause organ damage if overused. They promote a natural solution called Chillshot, sharing an anecdote: a friend has been giving her Aunt Chill a shot for the last year, and the Aunt no longer needs the IV iron she had been on for twelve years. The speaker argues this illustrates how natural solutions are overlooked in favor of conventional treatments. They also claim that fluoride in the public water supply and WiFi Bluetooth can lower red blood cells. Returning to Chillshot, they say it also helps with hair loss, especially when hormones are disrupted, and that Chillshot has some of the most studies for a natural remedy. The product is described as balancing hormones and aiding menopause, premenopause, and people taking DIM, suggesting that starting to use Chillazade balances hormones. The message emphasizes natural healing from the earth and restoring balance through Chillazade, implying that it is a natural alternative to conventional medical approaches.

The speaker criticizes the healthcare system, advising people not to get sick or go to the hospital because they believe it will result in death. They argue that Americans spend the most on healthcare but have lower life expectancy. They also mention that Americans consume 55% of the world's prescription medication, indicating a high level of sickness. The speaker questions the effectiveness of commonly prescribed medications like statins, claiming they increase the risk of diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. They cite studies suggesting that high cholesterol levels are associated with better survival rates in elderly patients. The speaker concludes by stating that diabetes and Alzheimer's medications are also ineffective.

The speaker explains that the body has a natural ability to heal itself if given the right conditions. They emphasize the importance of providing the body with the 90 essential nutrients it needs to function properly. However, modern agricultural methods and the stresses of life often deplete these nutrients, leading to various health issues. The speaker criticizes allopathic medicine for relying on drugs that only manage symptoms and further deplete the body's nutrients. This cycle of medication and worsening health can eventually lead to surgery, complications, and even death. The speaker concludes by criticizing the medical system and suggests that the money raised for finding cures should be given to those who failed to address the root cause of the problem.

Speaker 0 notes a contrast: people are afraid of parasites, yet caterpillars are worms too and nobody is afraid of them. They suggest this is something to think about. They state that the body makes parasites, and when there are too many heavy metals in the body, the body will make worms. Therefore, they argue, one should be afraid of the metals put into the body—like pesticides, vaccines, toxins, and related substances. They claim that people will take dewormers made by Rockefeller-founded pharmaceutical companies to destroy the worms, and question what these dewormers actually do, asserting that they destroy your own body. They remark that it’s wild to think about these things and that the dewormers’ origin isn’t commonly known, mentioning Rockefeller and “Great Public school.” The speaker contends that Rockefeller-created synthetic dewormers are sold as poison to destroy worms, while making the worm seem dangerous when, in reality, it’s one’s own habits being the issue. They then reference doctor Joel Weinstock, claiming he was healing diseases with parasites, adding this as something to think about.

One speaker argues that mold should not be feared because mold consists of spores, and spores are everywhere; spores are equated to pollen, suggesting that fear of mold is unfounded since they are the same thing. The other speaker adds that there are studies indicating that “those ones all heal all the diseases,” highlighting a notion that fear campaigns around mold are misleading. They claim that if a person has mold, candida, or similar issues in their body, it signifies “too many toxins” and that the body is signaling this excess as a remedy to keep the person alive. The dialogue includes a specific recollection about Ajana, who purportedly said that certain things are in the body so that toxins, metals, or similar substances may not actually take you out; otherwise they would seep into the organs and end you quickly. This is presented as evidence of the body’s miraculous nature. A central theme repeatedly asserted is that “the human body is absolutely miraculous” and that “everything is reversible.” The speakers list various conditions—autism, autoimmune diseases, lupus, and even eyesight—claiming they have witnessed people reverse these conditions. It is stated that people can regenerate their eyes and no longer need an eye professional, and that reversing all conditions is possible if one takes initiative. The speakers critique the medical establishment, implying that “every single professional will tell you the opposite because they want you to be their patient for life.” This sentiment is tied to a broader call for personal action: if people do not make changes—such as removing WiFi or taking other unspecified steps—they will continue to complain rather than find solutions. Overall, the message emphasizes that fear about molds and toxins is misguided, that the body possesses remarkable self-healing capabilities, and that proactive efforts can reverse a wide range of health issues. The speakers express a strong desire to provide solutions and to move people forward, rather than remain mired in complaint.

We can heal ourselves through lifestyle and diet changes, but they don't want us to know. Medications only provide temporary relief, not a cure. Highly processed food is also kept hidden from us.

Speaker 1 says someone claimed viruses are man-made and do not exist in nature, in anything, or beyond being a “made-up word.” Speaker 1 argues that people use terms such as EBV, HPV, “the HERP,” AIDS, HIV, and flu as labels that are “made up words.” They also claim that the system “poison[s] people on a regular basis,” including references to cell phone towers, vaccines, and pesticides, and that doctors are “Rockefeller Muppets” who are “there to sell you poisons” and “poison you the entire time.” Speaker 1 concludes that “diseases are poisoning.” Speaker 0 describes a personal example from childhood. Outside their house was a wetlands area full of frogs that kept them awake at night. Speaker 0 taped the windows to deal with the noise, and in spring the frogs made a “big racket.” Over time, Speaker 0 says the frogs were all gone. Speaker 0 then asks how many people think the frogs had a genetic disease, how many think the frogs had a virus, and how many think “somebody put DDT into the water.” Speaker 0 states: “Diseases are poisoning.”

Our healthcare system is criticized as a hoax, and the speaker advises against getting sick or going to the hospital because they believe it will lead to death. They argue that instead, people should focus on maintaining a healthy lifestyle. The speaker presents a graph comparing healthcare expenditure and life expectancy in the US, highlighting that despite spending the most on healthcare globally, Americans have a lower life expectancy. They also mention that Americans consume a significant amount of prescription medication, indicating a high level of illness. The speaker questions the effectiveness of commonly prescribed medications like statins, claiming they increase the risk of diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. They conclude by stating that diabetes and Alzheimer's medications are also considered hoaxes.

The speaker claims that the synthetic vitamin industry is a scam created by Big Pharma to sell more products. They argue that even organic vitamins are made from industrial waste such as coal tar ash, petroleum oil, black mold, and cyanide. The speaker explains that the push to sell vitamins began in the 1920s, with organizations lobbying for iodine to be added to table salt. This was followed by the fortification of milk with vitamin D and the identification of new vitamin deficiency diseases. The speaker suggests that this created a cycle of new vitamin discoveries and the need for chemical substitutes to keep people healthy.

The speaker criticizes the healthcare system, advising people to avoid getting sick and going to hospitals because they believe it will lead to death. They argue that Americans spend the most on healthcare but have a lower life expectancy compared to other countries. They also mention that Americans consume 55% of the world's prescription medication, suggesting that Americans are generally unhealthy. The speaker questions the effectiveness of commonly prescribed medications like statins for cholesterol, claiming they increase the risk of diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. They mention a study suggesting that high cholesterol levels are associated with better survival rates in elderly patients. The speaker concludes by stating that diabetes and Alzheimer's medications are also ineffective.