reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A person stated they paid a cartel around $10,000. They believe the American people are right to be concerned about who is entering the country, because there's no guarantee that everyone is "good." They ask what if they are killers or psychopaths. They claim there is no security bill, security check, or background check. They express worry about who is crossing the border, stating that some people do not look normal.

The speaker questions the number of people deported out of the 2 million encounters and releases at the border. The secretary avoids answering the question and claims the immigration system is broken. The speaker presses for a specific number of non-criminal deportations, but the secretary doesn't provide an answer. The speaker also criticizes the lack of removals for those who received removal orders. The secretary denies this claim. The speaker accuses the secretary of implementing a policy that allows people to stay in the country without committing a crime, burdening social services. The secretary denies this and defends the safe and orderly pathways policy. The speaker argues that encounters at ports of entry have increased, suggesting corruption within the Mexican government. The secretary disagrees with the speaker's statements but fails to provide any numbers. The speaker concludes that the Mexican government and the secretary are influenced by cartels.

The speaker shows wristbands that cartels force people to wear when crossing the border, highlighting the horrors of trafficking and smuggling. They share a photo of a terrified girl who was later revealed to have been rented by a man. The speaker criticizes the vetting process for children in HHS custody, pointing out that case managers lack training in interviewing traumatized children and evaluating documents. They question the thoroughness of the vetting process, mentioning the use of numbers on children's clothes and arms, and the release of children to sponsors who may be in the country illegally. The speaker challenges the secretary on the use of DNA tests and background checks, citing low percentages. They also mention the suspension of DNA requirements in case files. The speaker expresses concern over the large number of missing children under the secretary's watch.

In the past 3 years, there has been a significant increase in illegal border crossings and a backlog of asylum cases. The speaker questions why the secretary deserves to keep his job, considering these issues. The secretary responds by acknowledging the problems and emphasizing the need for legislation to address the broken immigration system.

The speaker accuses the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of causing harm, citing record levels of illegal immigration, declining deportations, and increased fentanyl deaths. They also criticize the creation of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), claiming it colluded with social media companies to censor free speech. The speaker questions the DHS representative about a court opinion that labeled their actions as a massive attack on free speech. The representative denies involvement in censorship but admits to being aware of disinformation threats. The speaker challenges the representative on who determines what is false or inaccurate, highlighting the issue of government control over information. The representative denies the allegations, but the speaker insists that the court's findings are not disputed.

Speaker 1 confirmed signing a memo but denied being the author of the family separation policy. Speaker 1 stated they gave Secretary Nielsen numerous recommendations on how to secure the border and save lives. Speaker 2 claimed that Speaker 1 recommended family separation as option three. Speaker 1 stated they recommended zero tolerance, the same as when any US citizen parent gets arrested with a child. Speaker 2 stated that legal asylees are not charged with any crime. Speaker 1 stated that being in the country illegally is a violation and that if one wants to seek asylum, they should do it the legal way at the port of entry. Speaker 1 referred to a congresswoman as the dumbest ever to listen to congress.

Will you work with President Trump to reinstate the Remain in Mexico program to ensure that only legitimate asylum claims are processed while individuals wait in Mexico? Yes, I will partner with him to reinstate this policy. Regarding the CBP 1 app, which allows asylum seekers to apply without providing evidence, will you end its use? Yes, if confirmed, I will shut down the CBP 1 app and preserve necessary data. The CHNV program has allowed mass parole without proper evaluation. Will you stop this abuse? Yes, we will return to case-by-case evaluations for parole and ensure our legal immigration system is fully utilized, with more judges and courts to process cases properly, unlike the current administration's approach.

I sympathized with migrants, but felt hostility from the Chinese. The lack of control at the US southern border for illegal crossings contrasts with the advanced technology for legal crossings. Biometric data collection is absent at the southern border, leaving room for troublemakers to go unidentified. This oversight is concerning given the potential risks involved.

The speaker discusses border security and immigration, stating that those in the U.S. without deportation orders should self-deport to avoid reentry bars. He claims that entering the U.S. illegally is a crime and encourages using the CBP One app or ICE to arrange for self-removal. He asserts the Trump administration aims to bring people into the U.S. legally, preventing exploitation by cartels and allowing Border Patrol to focus on security rather than humanitarian crises. He claims that illegal border crossings lead to increased fentanyl trafficking, sex trafficking, and potential terrorists entering the country. He states the American people voted for stricter immigration enforcement and that the administration is prioritizing public safety and national security threats for removal, using existing laws, including the Alien Enemies Act. He accuses the Biden administration of violating the law by not conducting case-by-case analyses for parolees and creating "shell games" with programs like CHNV and the CBP One app to lower border crossing numbers artificially. He insists the Trump administration achieved a more secure border by detaining those without proper documentation. He commits to following the law and Supreme Court rulings.

The speaker expresses concerns about Chinese nationals crossing the border and their potential connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or People's Liberation Army (PLA). They question whether impeaching Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, would solve the problem or if the issue runs deeper within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The speaker blames Mayorkas for the policies and failures at the border. They mention that evidence of ties to the PLA was provided by a sector chief, and a classified briefing on the matter is upcoming.

The speaker states that those in the U.S. without a deportation order should self-deport to avoid reentry bars. Doing so allows future legal entry through citizen petitions, work visas, or student visas. The speaker claims that illegal entry benefits criminal cartels and creates a humanitarian crisis, diverting resources from border security and leading to increased fentanyl smuggling, sex trafficking, and terrorist entries. The CBP One app and ICE offices are presented as resources for self-deportation. The speaker maintains that the U.S. treats everyone humanely and enforces existing laws, including the Alien Enemies Act, to secure the border. They assert that the majority of Americans want illegal aliens removed humanely. The speaker accuses the Biden administration of violating the parole statute by not conducting case-by-case analyses for those paroled into the country, specifically citing the CHNV program. They claim the administration manipulated border numbers by creating separate categories for entries through the CHNV program and CBP One app. The speaker concludes that the Trump administration achieved the most secure border in history by detaining those without proper documentation and reducing illegal crossings by 95%. They commit to following the law and Supreme Court rulings.

During a hearing, Senator questions Mr. Morant from Homeland Security about the number of non-American citizens who have entered the country illegally or claimed asylum since President Biden took office. Mr. Morant and others admit they do not know the exact numbers. The Senator suggests there may be around 8 million individuals, with potentially half of them being children. However, the exact figures remain unknown. The Senator continues to inquire about how many of these individuals are still in the country, how many have claimed asylum but failed to attend their hearings, and how many have been deported. No one has the answers to these questions.

The speakers discuss immigration and border security, questioning why the Biden administration doesn't secure the border. One speaker believes Biden has the executive authority to do so. They claim the asylum system is overwhelmed, with a significant backlog and increased immigration compared to 20 years ago, even more than during the Trump administration. They discuss the percentage of cases that result in deportation, suggesting that many asylum seekers are approved, even if their initial entry wasn't legal. Some enter legally on visitor visas and then apply for asylum when their status expires, which one speaker describes as a loophole. They also claim that the Democratic Party platform is influenced by whoever gives the most money to the party, resulting in control by special interests.

The speaker asks the Secretary about the situation at the southern border, specifically mentioning the high number of people brought through the ports of entry. The Secretary remains silent and does not provide any response.

There has been a continuous influx of migrants at the border, with numbers being hidden through the use of the CBP one app. Migrants are being told to return to Mexico, fill out the app, and then enter the US where they are immediately released. This violates immigration laws. Additionally, the number of terrorists crossing the border is increasing, with 29 apprehended this month. There has also been a significant rise in Chinese nationals, some of whom are linked to the PLA. This open border situation poses a national security crisis under Mayorkas' responsibility.

Illegals at the Miami airport can use the CBP one app as a valid ID to board planes in the US. The app allows migrants to claim asylum and enter the country, even if they have committed crimes. The app does not require photos and does not store biographical information. This raises concerns as illegal immigrants from countries on terror watch lists can use this process, while American citizens are required to have a real ID by 2025 to board flights. This discrepancy is difficult to justify.

The CBP One app, used by migrants claiming asylum, is now accepted at TSA checkpoints in the Miami airport's Delta terminal as valid ID for boarding planes. The CBP One app was intended to validate non-US citizen travel documentation when a traveler lacks acceptable ID. According to the speaker, migrants can enter any information into the app, even those wanted for crimes. Photos are optional, and biographical information is not stored. The speaker questions how people from terror watch list countries can use this process. The speaker contrasts this with the Real ID requirement for Americans by May 2025 to board flights. They question how illegal immigrants can board planes with unverifiable information while Americans face stricter ID requirements.

Chinese nationals crossing the southern border of the United States is a serious issue, raising concerns about China's intentions. Many Chinese nationals claim asylum, but if rejected, China refuses to take them back. There are worries that some of these individuals could be CCP spies, potentially creating havoc in the US if directed by Beijing. The number of Chinese nationals apprehended has significantly increased, indicating Beijing's exploitation of the current administration's perceived weakness. This situation poses a national security risk, considering China's history of surveillance, intellectual property theft, fentanyl distribution, COVID cover-up, and infiltration. Interviews with key figures like Tony Bobolinski and James Comey will shed light on these matters. Additionally, the Republican Party is experiencing changes, with calls for Mitch McConnell to step down and discussions with major donor Woody Johnson.

The speaker downloaded the CBP One app after the vice presidential debate to test its ease of use. The app asks users to identify as either a smuggler. It requires basic information like name, and a selfie; passport or ID are optional. The speaker chose California as their destination state, using a random ZIP code. The app allows users to select from eight different bridges to meet under; the speaker chose the Eagle Pass Bridge. The speaker, a white man from Michigan, used a picture of Carlos Mencia to demonstrate how easy it is to register. He claims that someone wanting to enter the country and obtain temporary asylum could easily use their own picture. The speaker states that he indicated having no documentation, ID, passport, or license, and that there's no way to cross-check the submitted information beyond the selfie.

The exchange centers on who is responsible for approving an asylum claim linked to an Afghan individual who was part of the Afghanistan evacuation and who was involved in a deadly incident in Washington, D.C. The dialogue is combative and procedural as members press for accountability and a straight answer. - Speaker 0 references a National Guardsman’s death in an incident involving the same individual, calling it an unfortunate accident, while Speaker 1 insists it was a terrorist act and asserts the guard member was shot in the head. The interaction escalates as Speaker 0 seeks clarification about who approved the asylum application for this person. - Speaker 0 asks plainly: “Who approved the asylum claim?” Speaker 1 responds that the asylum application was thoroughly filled out by information gathered by the Biden administration and that the asylum process was put into place under rules established by the Biden administration. Speaker 0 counters that, by implication, the Trump administration had changed the vetting process and the asylum had moved forward under those changes, prompting a dispute over attribution of responsibility. - Speaker 1 emphasizes that the evacuation of Afghanistan under Operation Allies Welcome was “thoroughly vetted by the Biden administration at that point in time” and insists that the individual’s asylum process followed the vetting and rules established by the Biden administration. Speaker 0 pushes back, pressing for a yes-or-no determination of who approved the asylum. - Speaker 2 offers a different framing, stating that the individual was vetted to serve as a soldier in Afghanistan and that this vetting standard was used by the Biden administration “as a ruse to bring him here.” He asserts that had standard operating procedures for special immigrant visas been followed, “none of the Allies Welcome people would have come to America,” attributing responsibility to President Biden. He also invokes a point of order and references a murder “that took place in DC,” insisting the prior description as “unfortunate” was inappropriate. - The dialogue includes interruptions and procedural motions: Speaker 2 asserts the comment about a murder was not a valid point of order; a separate speaker notes that the incident being discussed was not merely an “unfortunate incident” but a murder. - Throughout, the participants accuse each other of misattributing the asylum approval to the wrong administration and of altering vetting processes, with repeated demands for a straightforward answer about who approved the asylum application and persistent insistence that the Biden administration’s vetting and rules were the basis for the asylum decision. The exchange ends with procedural interjections and the continuation of the dispute over responsibility for the asylum approval and the accompanying tragic incident.

The Biden administration is allowing migrants to bypass ID checks at airports, raising security concerns. A recent DHS report reveals that illegal migrants can use the CBP One app instead of traditional identification, even choosing whether to allow officers to take their photo. This practice may inadvertently increase national security risks, according to the inspector general. A DHS spokesperson disputed the report, claiming it lacks context. However, the national security director for air marshals emphasized that unvetted individuals on flights pose a threat, as they can repeatedly fly without proper identification, often on taxpayer-funded flights.

Secretary Mayorkas has put national security at risk, allowing terrorists and enemies to flood across the border. There's been a surge in Chinese nationals, many military-age men with ties to the PLA and CCP, released into the U.S. by Secretary Mayorkas. It's likely China is using Russia's template of sending military personnel into the U.S. There are 10,000 Chinese nationals illegally crossing into the U.S. being released into the country this fiscal year. Today's hearing will investigate the details and effects of Mayorkas' dereliction of duty. The speaker hopes the American people, the press, and the President will take note of these failures.

The Department of Homeland Security admits it cannot track millions of illegal immigrants released into the U.S. interior. Emails uncovered by a watchdog group revealed that once immigrants board buses, their whereabouts are unknown. An estimated 14 million illegal immigrants have entered the country this way in the past three years, allegedly benefiting Mexican drug cartels. Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, explains that cartels exploit border policies by using migrants to distract agents and create openings for smuggling drugs and criminals. He says the cartels are a business, and current policies allow them to thrive. The speaker criticizes the Border Patrol for not effectively securing the border and enabling the entry of illegal immigrants and fentanyl. Judd defends the Border Patrol's endorsement of the border bill, arguing it would raise credible fear standards. The speaker argues that the bill was a "sellout" and an "amnesty bill." A heated debate ensues, with accusations of rhetoric and vilification. The speaker asserts that existing laws should be enforced and questions the Biden administration's willingness to do so.

More people are now entering the US through ports of entry rather than crossing the border illegally. This is because of an app that allows them to enter easily. However, the app has been hacked by Mexican cartels, who are now selling the service to migrants worldwide. They use a virtual private network to override the app's security and bring in as many people as possible. This shows that the Biden administration doesn't understand the extent to which cartels will go to make money. The question remains: Is Mexico an ally in the fight against illegal immigration?

Jenny Terry from the Daily Caller News Foundation asks the Secretary about the decrease in border numbers and the low illegal encounters. She questions why people are still being brought through the ports of entry and asks for an explanation.