TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

"Ms. Stokes wasn't elected." "She was nominated by the clerk." "In Mecklenburg County, the sitting clerk is Alyssa Chin Gary." "On her LinkedIn page, she calls herself a clerk, a DEI consultant, and a racial equity organizer." "And her life mission? Reparations." "Ms. Stokes was nominated by Judge Carla Archie." "Judge Archie is friends with Eric Holder, Obama's wingman." "And Judge Archie isn't just any judge." "In 2019, she was the DEI Champion of the Year." "Did a woman die because of DEI?" "Just a couple months ago, a guy shot five people on New Year's, and Judge Archie sentenced him to a year and a half for shooting five people." "This is a DEI court, and they have blood on their hands." "These courts need to be systematically dismantled, and that needs to happen immediately."

In 2018, the Dallas elections had irregularities, similar to what we're hearing now. Texas hired a cybersecurity group to investigate these irregularities, finding 10 different ways the Dominion equipment could be manipulated. Texas outlawed the use of Dominion, but it was still used. This group spent 2 years reverse engineering how to rig an election using Dominion. Meanwhile, another cybersecurity group, including hackers and other experts, mapped out the election manipulation plan. They approached DHS and CISA for a meeting, but they refused to attend. It's concerning how many people turned a blind eye to this issue. Lawyers involved may not understand the technology, but they should be held accountable.

What has happened to Tina Peters in Colorado is outrageous, and a criminal violation of our civil rights laws. As Mesa County Clerk, Tina Peters tried to look at election irregularities in Colorado, which is her job under Colorado statute, and accessed tabulation codes in the voting machines. Instead of a warning, the Colorado Secretary of State went to the Mesa County Prosecutor, and put Tina Peters in prison for nine years with the help of a partisan hack judge. The judge admitted he imposed the severe penalty because she advanced false claims about Trump's defeat and became a celebrity among those who denied he lost the race. The acting US attorney in Colorado just filed a statement of interest in Tina Peters' habeas petition, pointing out that this is a 69 year old woman whose health is failing in state prison, and she's being punished for protected First Amendment thoughts.

The speaker discusses the legality of town clerks investigating elections in Michigan and hiring outside parties for investigations. They mention reports from experts that confirm their claims. They accuse the secretary of state and attorney general of Michigan of trying to shut down the investigation and implicate themselves. The speaker explains how Stephanie, funded by the America Project, fought in court to keep the attorney general from taking over the case. They criticize the attorney general for wanting to bring charges against those involved in examining election machines and thumb drives, despite previously instructing to erase the data. The speaker defends the use of expert witnesses and mentions their role as a consultant to the project.

I was part of the group arrested for the Whitmer kidnap plot, which was set up by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be targeting Whitmer's cottage. I got charged for material support terrorism and felony firearm possession. The government lied about the situation. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice in the face of government overreach.

The speakers discuss allegations about Brian Gamble and his wife in relation to Project Veritas. Speaker 0 says Reba claimed that Brian Gamble's wife worked with Project Veritas and that she was a honeypot with them, along with Brian Gamble. Speaker 1 confirms, stating, “Oh, yes, she does. 100%. She works with Project Veritas. She's a honeypot with them. Her and Brian Gamble.” He also mentions a social media reference: Vincent Kennedy posted a picture of a pineapple upside down getting eaten by a gorilla, and notes that Loco Lobo posted about it, adding, “the upside upside down pineapple signifies that somebody's a swinger.” He then says, “Brian Gamble's okay with his wife going out on dates with these guys to obtain information from Project Veritas. Is that kosher? Like, would you let your wife do that? And Brian Gamble, as we all know, wants to have parties and get with the babes, you know, the fucking Botox babes and their plastic faces. Fuck them.” Speaker 2 adds, “Well, the record show that Brian Gamble, who was the CIO of the America Project with Joe Flynn and Mike Flynn, his wife, is a honeypot for Project Veritas. Okay. Just let the record show.” Speaker 0 says, “I will.”

Speaker introduces Tina Peters, a gold star mother whose son died in Iraq. He says she went and got involved in our government and, upon seeing Davinian voting machines, declared it's my job to back up hard drive. She allegedly made a backup copy of the hard drive, giving President Trump and his administration every shred of evidence they needed to put all these people away. Peters spent the year on lunch duty in Colorado prisons, wearing yellow boots. The speaker blames Trump for inaction, suggesting he could move White House to Colorado and appoint a special counsel to investigate Colorado election fraud, but it's a state charge. He claims Jewish allies staged it and accuses a foreign government of buying a US social media platform to indoctrinate Americans, cites Israel's free healthcare and education, says settlers are paid to steal land, and says Tina Peters will rot in jail.

We subpoenaed Mike Frontera, Dominion's lawyer, but they blocked our witnesses. Since June, 670 bios passwords from 63 of Colorado's 64 counties have been publicly accessible, putting the election at risk. Jenna Griswold knew about this during my trial and failed to inform the clerks, only apologizing afterward. This negligence could compromise elections in other states too, particularly with Dominion machines. There are issues in Arizona and Michigan linked to this. The situation connects back to corruption involving Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, as highlighted by whistleblower Gary Brunson.

We subpoenaed Mike Frontera, Dominion's lawyer, but they prevented us from accessing our witnesses. Since June, 670 bios passwords from 63 of Colorado's 64 counties have been publicly available, putting election security at risk. Jenna Griswold should be held accountable for this leak, which she knew about during my trial but failed to address. This negligence has compromised not just Colorado's elections but potentially others across the U.S. involving Dominion machines. There are serious concerns about election integrity in states like Arizona and Michigan. The situation ties back to international corruption, including connections to Venezuela and figures like Hugo Chavez.

Prosecutors have identified billions in Medicaid fraud across 14 programs, and researchers have now found a fifteenth area: assisted living. In Minnesota, the assisted living program is expanding faster than other programs, with payments rising 10 to 15 times as fast. Data on area facilities show Minneapolis has 169, Saint Paul has 83 (population 307,000), Brooklyn Center has 106 (pop. ~30,000), and Brooklyn Park has 181 (pop. ~84,000), highlighting a higher concentration of facilities in smaller cities. The assisted living facility in question is housed in what appears to be a single-family home, yet it bills itself as an assisted living facility and receives substantial state funding. The facility is owned by Gandhi Mohammad, now Gandhi Abdi Qadai, through his LLC, and his wife runs the assisted living services. The state continues to pay while he awaits trial. The report notes that this man was indicted in the Feeding Our Future scam, which involved false billing, and asks why he is still receiving state funds through these facilities. Speakers discuss whether Feeding Our Future indictments should trigger a cross-check to prevent individuals involved in that scheme from receiving other state funds. One speaker asks, “Do you know the Feeding Our Future scandal?” and notes the lack of awareness among people being interviewed. It is stated that the man who owns the building was indicted in Feeding Our Future, and that his shell company was used to purchase a new assisted living facility property, with his wife operating the service provider side. The facility received over 2,300,000 in state money last year, and a Minnesota reformer article claims the person has been paid 49,000,000 since 2016. The interviewees question how it is possible that someone indicted in Feeding Our Future is still collecting checks from the state through these assisted living centers run by his wife. State Representative Kristen Robbins, chair of the House Fraud and Oversight Committee, expresses concern that basic due diligence was not performed to cross-check Feeding Our Future defendants against other state funding. The parties reached out to the man and his wife but have not heard back. They also contacted the Department of Human Services, which stated that they cannot cut funding from this person because he is “simply a landlord,” with his wife running the service provider arm of the facilities. The department’s position is described as passing the buck.

Tina Peters, a gold star Navy Seal mom and former Mesa County, Colorado recorder, is imprisoned with a nine-and-a-half-year sentence after a conviction. She became suspicious of election systems after unusual April 2021 county elections. When Dominion was sent to work on her county's machines, Peters preserved records, leading to the Mesa County number three report. The DOJ filed a statement of interest regarding her case, citing concerns about the lengthy sentence, First Amendment implications, and denial of bail. The DOJ is reviewing cases nationwide for abuse of the criminal justice process, including whether Peters' prosecution was politically motivated rather than pursuing justice. The speaker claims Peters had a duty to preserve the records, and her actions revealed significant fraud. The speaker alleges the judge ran a kangaroo court, preventing the admission of evidence of fraud uncovered by Peters' actions. A key witness allegedly lied on the stand, with the judge and prosecutor reinforcing the false testimony. The speaker urges financial support for Peters through TinaPeters.US and vouches for the integrity of the Lindell Offense Fund, stating that no money was taken for personal use.

The conversation centers on Tina Peters, her defense team, and alleged procedural and ethical problems surrounding her case. The speaker details his personal involvement, including paying a million dollars to Doug Richards to defend Peters. He recounts discovering misgivings about Richards’ defense plan a few days before trial and visiting Richards’ hotel room to hear his theory of the case. Richards allegedly arrived resentfully on a Zoom call with other criminal defense attorneys and proposed a strategy to put Peters on the stand, claiming that “colonelson” told her to image a hard drive. The speaker notes that colonelson was the president’s attorney, not Peters’ own attorney, and Richards supposedly argued Peters could claim it was legal advice from an attorney, although the speaker states California does not have a legal advice exception and Colorado law would render such a defense nugatory. The proposed strategy allegedly aimed to create jury sympathy for a 68-year-old grandmother rather than present substantive legal arguments or evidence of fraud. The speaker contends that Richards’ strategy would have resulted in Peters going on the stand with no other witnesses, effectively inviting jury nullification and failing to argue legitimate defenses or present critical motions. Peters reportedly fell ill during this period, and she fired Richards at the last moment, seeking proper counsel. The judge and Richards are described as part of a “railroad” process in Colorado, with Richards allegedly designing an ineffectual defense to push Peters to testify, thereby enabling possible indictments of Kurt Olson and 45. The speaker asserts that several local criminal defense attorneys on a Zoom call were horrified by Richards’ strategy and that the defense was deliberately weak. Stephanie Lambert, currently indicted in Michigan, who is in leg irons in Washington, DC, then took Peters’ case and filed motions that, in the speaker’s view, should have been filed earlier. These motions contend that Peters, as county recorder, had the right to make a backup of election data, and that the backup was a legitimate act; a friend with a cyber background and a surfer athlete allegedly participated with Peters’ permission, though the employee “Billy” later denied it. The speaker asserts Peters did nothing wrong and that the charges should have been dismissed. The speaker criticizes the legal profession more broadly, claiming mass coordination by state bar associations and “Project 65” to deprive people of Sixth Amendment rights, citing John Eastman as another example. He mentions a concerted effort to undermine the defense and hints at promises of federal judgeships in exchange for cooperation. He notes that Peters’ motions filed by Lambert should have been filed earlier and accuses Richards of crafting a strategy that would have allowed immediate indictments of Donald Trump’s legal team. The speaker references a Supreme Court filing and a constitutional crisis, stating that the Supreme Court already has “everything it needs” as of the prior night. He praises one DC judge as fair and straightforward, while his other cases are described as varied, though he intends to proceed even if it means jail time. He promises to upload a confidential brief and invites the audience to read the filing with SCOTUS, signaling ongoing legal action.

Byron Thedford? That's me. Oh, we received a report that you were pushing DEI in defiance of the state law and seeking loopholes to get around the law. Is that true? It's not. No, sir. You've never talked about pushing loopholes to get around the law? I haven't. No. What about this video?

Anne VanderSchel asserts that U.S. elections were not compromised by a glitch but were penetrated by global intelligence weapons, a system that did not begin in Colorado but in Serbia. She describes it as a CIA playground where foreign and domestic intelligence agencies perfected digital election manipulation long before Americans knew the name Smartmatic. She claims the system was handed off to Venezuelan military, weaponized through Smartmatic to flip elections, delete logs, and control entire nations, and that this foreign military infrastructure was quietly slipped into the United States, with her saying she witnessed it herself in Panama and the Darien Gap alongside Michael Young, noting the influx of Venezuelan and other foreign nationals. VanderSchel emphasizes that those responsible expected governors, secretaries of state, and corrupt supervisors of elections to cooperate, and they did—except for Mesa County, Colorado county clerk Tina Peters. She claims Peters imaged the Dominion machines before they were illegally wiped, thereby preserving the only untouched 2020 dataset in America. She notes there were 3,143 counties in the country, and Peters was the only county clerk who held that image, which VanderSchel says mirrors exactly what Serbian and Venezuelan insiders described. She asserts that once Peters exposed the election fraud and the foreign intelligence operation on American soil, those involved moved to destroy her, and that this is why she believes Peters is in a prison cell. VanderSchel characterizes Peters’ case as the single most important national security case in modern American history. She closes by stating she, Anne VanderSchel, will not back down and urges others to speak out as well. She calls for a strong public push to support President Trump’s executive order and the deployment of 500 National Guard pods in every state to reach election supervisors and precincts. She warns that if officials refuse to follow the executive order and hand-count ballots, arrests should begin.

"Did you know the last time they went to court, the CFIA get to submit 139 pages of documented evidence while the farm was allowed zero? Did you know that? That's our justice system. Interesting." "So if you're if you're enforcing the justice system that isn't just, does that make that just?" "I don't know. Maybe. Well, you could say no. I'm just gonna listen to my boss because he's got where I got. I got a lot of respect for him." "He's gone through the mill. He made it through. Most people don't. So he's cream of the crop. He's kinda like what you aspire to." "Intention. Comes down to why why you want what you want. You're a mercury healthy bird. Stop killing sick chicken. You're a mercury healthy." "My name is Jim Kerr. I represent the good people of this country who say"

I was part of a group arrested for a plot to kidnap Governor Whitmer, but it was a setup by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be about the governor's cottage. I got charged with material support terrorism for taking a video. The government lied about my involvement. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice prevails.

In my twenty-plus years of practicing law, including my time as chief of the Financial Crimes of Public Corruption Unit, I've never encountered anything like this conversation with the prosecutor. A red line was definitely crossed. Essentially, the threats were, "admit wrongdoing, or we'll pursue a felony charge on a technicality, win or lose." That's disturbing, it's wielding the law as a weapon, not a search for truth. This case felt like a runaway freight train, the prosecutor is dead set on bringing this case against Dr. Hine.

Claims include that "we're not getting the cooperation that we need" from the Department of Justice, where "Pam Bondi sits as the head of it" but "the COO" is "Todd Blanche," whom the speaker says is "failing on all measures." "Because of him, we haven't had a pardon granted since May" and "Because of him, the he wants the j sixers to not be compensated for all that we put them through." He adds, "we're not, getting the things that we need for Dominion machines, etcetera, etcetera." He notes Blanche "used to be until 01/04/2024, he was a Democrat, a registered Democrat" and "then he represented Donald Trump on the Stormy Daniels case that any Democrat would have done the same job," and argues that "everything that needs to be going forward in order to make Donald Trump's presidency work is being stalled intentionally by this man." "It's not because of ineptitude." "This is a smart guy. This is a very capable guy." "It's because he's intentionally, doing things the opposite of what Donald Trump has ordered to be done."

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

The speaker asserts that in their affidavit they list 19 points and describe spending 27 hours at the TCF Center. They state they are a mother with two children and two degrees, and claim they would never write an affidavit under oath just to write it, noting that you can go to prison for this. They explain that they was initially supposed to work at the Detroit Department of Elections building, an order by their manager, Nick Economagunas, whom they identify as part owner of Dominion. They claim they have emails confirming the arrangement and that they were trained on the adjudication and tabulation process. An email allegedly instructs them to park in a lot and be shuttled to what they call the “Chicago Warehouse.” The speaker asserts that there was illegal activity at that location, stating that there are pictures of people carrying ballots out of the place and vans full of ballots leaving. Around 4:30 AM, they say there was an announcement that a new shipment of ballots was arriving, and that these boxes of ballots were brought in by “mister Baxter” from the rear of the room. They personally witnessed Mr. Baxter carrying boxes from the rear basement of the TCF Center to the tables. They describe each box as containing approximately 600 ballots, and note that the tables were 10-foot tables and about seven tables in total, all full of boxes of ballots. They estimate that about 50,000 ballots were brought in, clarifying that not all ballots were necessarily from the rear entrance, but that there were far more ballots than the ones brought in from the rear entrance. They recount the timeline as starting at 6 AM, with shipments arriving around 4:30–5 AM, and three rounds of activity earlier in the night—from around 10 PM to 1 AM and 1 AM to 4 AM—followed by the arrival of the 4:30 AM boxes. With the shift change, most volunteers, who had expected to be there from 10 PM to 5 AM, left at 5 AM, leaving the speaker to stay. The shift change occurred, and at 6 AM, Baxter and his management team resumed on the microphone. They allegedly stated, “this is what democracy is is supposed to look like,” and the whole room cheered in response to the new shift.

Speaker 0 notes that there were at least more than two of your direct employees and one indirect at the TCF center, up to nine, though no names are provided to avoid threats; they request clarification on each person’s responsibilities and roles during the process. Speaker 1 states backups were created by Tina Peters, Mesa County, Colorado county clerk. They are receiving information across the country that Dominion reps were going in under the guise of trusted build maintenance and wiping records. Under one dash 12 dash 69, those records by law have to be preserved. They caution not to blame staff, explaining a knee-jerk reaction by Dominion in Michigan to convince clerk staff they must have done something wrong. When discussing county liability, they emphasize listening to Mr. Lindbergh’s expert opinion. Speaker 0 asks about Ethernet access for adjudicators and tabulators in the TCF Center. Speaker 2 responds that the devices are not connected to the Internet; they are designed to be completely standalone and connected locally in a local area network separate from the Internet. Speaker 3 explains the vehicle for transmission from the ICP is a cellular modem, which can be configured in a VPN; Chicago and Cook County work with Verizon to secure that network, implying the same capabilities are available elsewhere. They note that multiple wireless chipsets/modems are supported, depending on jurisdiction preferences and network compatibility. Speaker 4 adds that some jurisdictions use a 3G modem (GSM) but can support multiple modem varieties, including latest 4G/5G standards. They confirm applicability across different networks (Verizon, AT&T, Sprint). They mention transmitting from the ICP in Mongolia, indicating no network limitations. In Puerto Rico, three vendors are used (Claro, AT&T, and T-Mobile) due to incomplete island coverage. Speaker 0 asks again about Ethernet setup to join the LAN. Speaker 5 paraphrases a claim that Dominion could fix the problem, implying Dominion can communicate with the device. Speaker 6 explains, by analogy to Apple remote support, that permission was given to take over the device to reprogram it from Adams Park to SSO 2 A and B at West Balding Drive Elementary. Speaker 7 shares observations from the TCF Center on the third and fourth, noting irregularities on election day. Randy Bishop, who owns radio stations and is IT-savvy, showed him high-speed scanners and tabulators with Ethernet lines running out of the tabulators, all bundled together and connected to routers and a main computer, which he says are connected to the Internet and that such connectivity is illegal and should not happen because it opens them to hacking. Speaker 2 reiterates that the computers in the local area network are connected via an RJ45 connector.

The speaker mentions that certain individuals, including Caitlin Long and Naomi Brockwell, were mentioned in a situation where they were threatened with prison time unless they complied with certain demands. The speaker finds it surprising because these individuals have good reputations and credibility. They also mention that an attorney put all of this information in an affidavit, indicating that the attorney believes the claims made by Steve. The other speaker agrees and states that this was the turning point for them.

The speaker clarifies that the paperwork they signed was not done in secrecy and was publicly explained on their Facebook page. Another speaker points out that intent and beliefs do matter, citing an attorney's interpretation of the law. The first speaker agrees, stating that the attorney general seems to have no idea what she's doing and suggests that this is political persecution, not a criminal prosecution.

"You've been intrusive into people's personal lives." "You're confused. You think I'm on trial." "These people are on trial for trying to steal an election in 2020." "I'm not on trial." "Here's the next one that shows you can see republican is written there." "Republicans written there." "This is, ballot 61." "This is ballot number two." "The batch number was it 5162? Scanner 5162." "Duplicate ballots. The entire batch is scanned several times." "We are at a time in history, people." "We are at a time in history when you can no longer sit back and just let other folks do." "You cannot expect black women to be perfect and save the world." "The Lord is completing us." "We need your prayers. We need to be allowed to stumble. We need grace." "Please find a way to do your extraordinary God given assignment." "Yes. And make this community and the world a better place for all of his people."

The speaker discusses a woman named Fenny Willis, who used to be their lawyer but is now a prosecutor. They mention that Fenny Willis represented them in a previous case before becoming a district attorney. The speaker believes this is a conflict of interest and questions how Fenny Willis can now try to indict them. They suggest doing a live interview to provide evidence of their claims. The speaker also mentions that someone else, possibly Kaepernick, was interviewed and told the truth. They express their belief that God works in mysterious ways.