reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the longevity and origins of lighting technology, presenting several notable claims about the history and the modern lighting industry. They begin by highlighting a Mazda bulb, noting that the “old Mazda bulbs would last one hundred and twenty years.” They claim that General Electric (GE) and other light bulb companies responded by reverse engineering this original design to create bulbs that would break down faster, enabling more frequent sales of replacement bulbs. The speaker asserts that the original incandescent Mazda bulb demonstrated exceptional longevity, and they reference the “centennial incandescent” as still burning for more than a hundred and twenty years, with a specific mention that this can be looked up in California. A broader point is then made about LEDs and the environmental argument often used to promote them. The speaker asserts that LEDs, which many people hear are superior for saving the Earth, already had a technology foundation prior to LEDs. They claim that the light bulbs capable of lasting a century existed before LEDs. The speaker then asserts that LEDs were created by IBM and Monsanto, with the implication that the design and production of LED lighting involve entities described as a computer company and a toxic pesticide company. From there, the speaker links this history to contemporary use: bringing an LED bulb into a home, positioned above the head, is framed as bringing in a bulb “designed by a computer company and a toxic pesticide company.” The consequence, as claimed, is that this choice will affect the body, with specific adverse outcomes listed as brain fog, fatigue, blindness, cataracts, and hair-related issues. The overall argument ties the adoption of LED lighting to concerns about health and corporate influence, suggesting that the modern LED bulbs carry risks tied to their corporate origins and design. In summary, the speaker presents a chain of assertions: Mazda’s long-lasting bulbs inspired industry changes aimed at shorter-lived replacements; the existence of a century-lasting incandescent example (the centennial incandescent) still operating in California; LEDs being developed by IBM and Monsanto; and the implication that using LEDs introduces health risks such as brain fog, fatigue, blindness, cataracts, and hair problems due to their alleged corporate provenance.

The video argues that removing LED bulbs from homes is important because LEDs contribute to health issues on a daily basis. It contrasts LEDs with traditional light sources, stating that the sun, fire, and incandescent bulbs emit infrared light, which “actually boost cellular energy and repair.” In contrast, LEDs are described as exposing people “only to blue light.” The speaker cites studies claiming that prolonged exposure to this blue light accelerates aging, disrupts neurotransmitters in the brain, and impairs mitochondria. These effects are presented as reasons why many people feel constantly tired and drained when indoors. Another point made is that LED bulbs flicker at high speeds that are “too fast for your eyes to notice, but enough to stress your brain and your nervous system.” This flicker is presented as an additional risk associated with LED lighting. To mitigate these issues, the speaker shares a personal precaution: wearing blue light blocking glasses “anytime I can’t control my environment and the lighting.” The overall message emphasizes a link between LED lighting and adverse health effects, drawing a contrast with traditional light sources and recommending the use of protective eyewear in situations where lighting cannot be controlled.

Speaker 0 argues that LEDs emit radio frequencies that harm people, the same stuff that comes from a cell phone, and that blue light is toxic to our body. They claim a digital light on your face and a street light on your face, and criticize putting LEDs all over faces as silly. If sticking to any type of colored bulb, they say you should use incandescent or halogen or a UV bulb, and “you just go tanning.” They state there’s no need to put LEDs on the face and suggest it should be outlawed because they were never pushed. They claim LEDs are linked to cataracts and mess up health, causing a lot of brain fog, making people unable to focus; in the grocery store, people can’t think because the lights are affecting health. If natural light isn’t available, they recommend getting a candle and placing candles and salt lamps around the house, or, if not, using incandescents or halogens and not bringing LEDs into the house. They further claim that many people with health issues like ringing in the ears are affected by LEDs and Wi-Fi in the home, and that this combination will mess you up.

- The speaker says this is probably the creepiest bulb here at Ace Hardware. - The Smart WiFi bulb works with Alexa and Google Home, activates with your voice, and syncs up to your Google Home and your Alexa, giving a George Orwell 1984 vibe. - The speaker explains this is why they stick to incandescent bulbs, noting that incandescent bulbs don’t steal your information or watch you.

The speaker discusses the Administration's ban on incandescent and halogen bulbs starting August 1, 2023. They express concern about the negative effects of LED bulbs, such as causing anxiety, restlessness, and impacting melatonin levels. The speaker also mentions that LED bulbs are linked to blindness, flicker excessively, and emit microwave radiation. They highlight the potential privacy issues with smart bulbs, as they can sync with various devices and collect personal information. The speaker advises stocking up on incandescent and halogen bulbs before the ban takes effect.

Today, we discuss the replacement of healthy bulbs with fluorescent and LED bulbs. LEDs are said to save money, but the difference in cost is minimal. LED bulbs emit radio frequencies, which can cause interference, but this is not mentioned on the packaging. Fluorescent bulbs, marketed as earth-friendly and long-lasting, contain mercury and other hazardous materials. They also emit radio frequencies that disrupt various devices. The bulbs they want to ban actually last over 3000 hours, but there are no warning labels about radio frequency emissions.

The speaker discusses a weapon that can be programmed for various wavelengths. They mention a blue object, such as a card and an umbrella, which did not burn when exposed to flames.

The speaker describes a new device used to measure the spectrum of light, noting that under full sunshine it reveals all seven colors—“just like the rainbow”—and that this natural spectrum is straightforward. When measuring incandescence, the speaker highlights a “beautiful red hue” and claims there is “really none of the other stuff to make you go blind,” implying that incandescent light presents a safe, simple spectrum in comparison to other sources. The speaker then discusses LEDs, stating that they are “super weird to have LEDs” because they “cause blindness, cataracts, dizziness, headaches, fatigue,” and references “that color spectrum” as part of the issue. Fluorescence is described as being almost identical to LEDs in this respect. The speaker also mentions “full moonlight” in this context, implying a comparison between the spectral qualities of LEDs/fluorescent light and moonlight. A key point emphasized is that LEDs and fluorescent bulbs seem to mimic moonlight, which the speaker notes as a source of behavioral or perceptual effects, claiming that this similarity to moonlight is what contributes to people going nuts. The overall message centers on a contrast between the spectra of different light sources—sunlight with its full seven-color spectrum, incandescence with a prominent red hue and fewer problematic elements, and LEDs/fluorescent lighting with problematic health and perceptual effects and a moonlight-like quality.

The speaker describes observing moonlight and notes that the color spectrums appeared as lines, with certain colors missing, and that the moonlight is constantly changing. They claim this is why people go nuts during the full moon. They assert that the Epstein files were dropped two days before the full moon because “everybody goes nuts when they find out that the government's a bunch of pedophiles … and they need to be hung.” They argue that LEDs and fluorescence are very similar to moonlight, producing the same color spectrum, which is why LEDs and fluorescence are used in homes—to give people the same moonlight spectrum. The speaker claims that people walk around with pulsating and flickering light, “going completely crazy,” because the color spectrum from the moon flickers like an LED or fluorescent bulb during the full moon. They say they bought a device to see what the color spectrum is of what is coming off the moon. The speaker contends this is also why incandescent bulbs should be banned, arguing that incandescent bulbs are being removed for a reason: “number one, they're healing on the eyes,” and that there’s a red spectrum which is “actually very beneficial.”

Speaker 0: Wanna do a little video showing the difference between an incandescent bulb and an LED bulb so you guys can see the difference. Incandescent is very natural, very healing, great for reading. These are like putting an LED streetlight in your home. That is a light emitting diode. It's creating the light color, and it's very, very high in radio frequencies and messes with the mind because of the flicker rate. First, these little cute end incandescent bulbs, none of that. Very simple, very safe. If you don't have access to these bulbs, you can also do things with candlelight. You can look into fire light fire meditations. But LEDs, I would say not putting any of this stuff in your house because it messes with the mind, with the melatonin levels, and doesn't allow you to sleep. This is why people are suffering from so many sleeping issues is because these bulbs.

Speaker 0: So instead of putting the LED lights on your face, here's a simple option. Look at this. $1. $1. Who would guess from 1000bulbs.com? You can stock up on any types of bulbs you want, incandescents, halogens, the whole thing.

The speaker discusses differences between radium and sulfur, claiming that radium’s apparent similarity to sulfur can mislead people. They state that radium water contains a lot of sulfur, and that sulfur is actually responsible for the healing properties attributed to hot springs. According to the speaker, people are told not to drink from radium glassware or to use radium pads on the body, implying that those cautions are intended to misdirect from the sulfur-related healing effects. The speaker notes a connection between radium and the UV spectrum, describing radium as related to the sun spectrum. They claim that people used to infuse radium into glass and then drink from it. The term “radium girls” is mentioned, with the suggestion that concerns about radium are overstated or part of a larger pattern of caution. A point is raised that painting with radium is linked to illness, highlighting that “the ladies were licking paint” for ten hours a day and that licking paint is dangerous, implying that those risks are more significant than the risks associated with radium itself. The speaker mentions a belief in radium hot springs, referencing British Columbia, Canada, and asserts that those springs are widespread. They list prominent families and figures—the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, JFK, and “all the presidents”—as having frequented Radium Springs, implying a historical elite association with the sites. The speaker claims that the admonitions to stay away from radium are deliberate, equating this with similar cautions about radium stones. They recall that people used to hold radium stones in their hands to heal inflammation and pain, emphasizing that radium is a radioactive material and that individuals are “radioactive beings.” The overarching assertion is that the public is told to avoid radium, but the speaker questions why, suggesting a hidden motive. In closing, the speaker reiterates that people are told to stay away from radium and advises not to go around looking at it, reinforcing the message that radium carries dangers that are framed as higher than the risks presented by other substances.

Speaker 0 discusses the push for LED lighting and questions the narrative that LEDs will save the planet. He points to the Centennial Light Bulb as the oldest and longest-running light bulb, noting it is an incandescent bulb that has lasted over a hundred and twenty years and is still functioning. He mentions that this bulb was included in the Guinness World Book of Records and was promoted by General Electric. He then shifts to a critical counterpoint about General Electric. He states that the same General Electric “created this cartel with other Phillips and other electric companies to basically create fines on incandescent bulbs that lasted too long.” From there, he connects the push for LED bulbs to this history: incandescent bulbs are portrayed as inefficient, yet the same electric companies allegedly worked to suppress long-lasting incandescent bulbs through fines and by eliminating producers of such bulbs. He suggests a contradiction in the industry’s stance: the effort to promote LEDs while historically working to reduce the availability of long-lasting incandescent bulbs through a collusive effort among major companies. The speaker ends with an implied implication that there is a conflict between the long-lasting performance of incandescent bulbs and industry actions intended to phase them out, hinting at a broader critique of the push toward LED lighting.

Speaker 0 says that at the lows people are buying incandescent bulbs because of a new ban, and it is important to stock up on these bulbs. Incandescent bulbs are described as very natural to our eyes, and it is emphasized that one should put incandescent bulbs into the home and not LEDs. The speaker claims the problem with LED lights is that they burn out the back of the eye, which “causes cataracts,” and that smart bulbs and devices connected to WiFi ping radiation to the skull while plugged in. Therefore, the advice is to avoid anything with LED and anything that's smart—specifically, smart remote, smart sensors, smart plugs, and smart bulbs. The speaker notes that these are all LED lights installed in the hardware store. Additionally, the speaker urges avoiding anything with Bluetooth built in because Bluetooth operates at the same frequency as a microwave. The overall message is that many marketing tactics push the new bulbs, but one should stick to incandescent bulbs.

In the video, Speaker 0 explains that LED lights are being pushed aggressively, even given away for free, because they will connect everything in the Internet of Things. These LED lights can be connected to a cellphone, a tablet, all home appliances, the thermostat, cars, the garage, and more, allowing monitoring and data collection from these devices. They can also be used to turn off devices based on climate reasons and other factors, meaning you are connected up to the Internet of Things. What’s interesting, according to the speaker, is that these LED lights “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” which will be demonstrated in the next video. The speaker describes using a TriField EMF tester to check the radiation coming off the LED lights and shows results labeled as “off the charts.” The claim is that by bringing these lights into the home, microwave radiation is being pinged into the house. The speaker asserts that this microwave radiation can impact health, listing effects on the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs. The LED lights’ capability to connect to the Internet of Things is highlighted again as part of this scenario. The video then notes a claim about a 2016 announcement from the AMA, stating that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration, implying long-term harm to eyesight while allegedly promoting environmental aims. In summary, the narrator claims: - LED lights are being pushed and given away because they enable the Internet of Things, connecting to smartphones, tablets, home appliances, thermostats, cars, and garages for monitoring and control. - These LEDs allegedly “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” detectable with an EMF tester, described as “off the charts.” - The radiation entering the home is claimed to impact health, including the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs, in addition to enabling IoT connectivity. - The speaker cites a 2016 AMA statement asserting that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration.

In the discussion, LED light bulbs are described as toxic and advisable to carry a warning label. The speaker presents two specific warnings about LED lighting: - Warning 1: The flicker effect. LED lights flicker at a frequency that is unperceptible to the eye but claimed to be brain-disrupting, potentially leading to sleep disturbances, migraines and headaches, brain fog and fatigue, and harm to the health of the eyes. - Warning 2: Unhealthy levels of blue light. LED lights are said to emit high levels of blue light, which can disrupt the circadian rhythm and affect mood. The speaker asserts the following factual contrasts to incandescent and halogen lighting: LED lights drain energy and life from the body, whereas incandescent and halogen lighting contain a full spectrum of light and infrared light that supposedly adds energy and light to the body, making people healthy. A call to action is issued to switch out lighting, with an optimistic note that the 2022 ban on incandescence and halogens might be reversed in 2025. The message emphasizes that these symptoms and effects can be life-altering for some individuals, and it ends with a request to share the video.

The speaker notes finding incandescent bulbs at Ace Hardware, highlighting a range of watt options such as 25-watt bulbs (including 25-watt globes) and some 40-watt bulbs, which the speaker says can work and are preferable to other options described as “torture.” They compare these to LEDs, pointing out that the spectrum of light from LEDs varies, with a specific emphasis on the yellow spectrum being “off the charts” in the examples shown. The speaker suggests that when entering someone’s home, you might as well ask what type of light bulbs they have. They raise a point about LEDs enabling additional features beyond lighting, stating that LEDs can be connected to the Internet and may have cameras, syncing with devices, and could watch or monitor you. This leads to the claim that the push toward LEDs was not only about saving energy but about having connected bulbs that could spy on people, while noting that old incandescent bulbs “don’t spy on you.” The speaker asserts that this surveillance motivation is connected to government actions, claiming that incandescents were being banned and eliminated because they supposedly prevented spying on citizens. The overall message contrasts incandescent bulbs with LEDs, presenting LEDs as part of a dystopian surveillance trend and portraying incandescents as non-spying alternatives.

Speaker 0 explains that pink uranium glass is actually magnesium glass. They state that you have magnesium, uranium, cobalt, and manganese, and those are all the different types of glass that exist. According to the speaker, when a person consumes each different glassware, each different property gives a different property to the body to heal the body. If a person is feeling down, they might use a little uranium. If someone has low energy, they might use cobalt. If they’re experiencing depression, they might use manganese or magnesium. The speaker asserts that all of these different glasswares emit different frequencies, which heal the body in a different way, and this is why people used to drink out of them. They mention uranium glass, depression glass, and baseline glass as part of the old world. The speaker then connects this to alchemy, stating that this is part of alchemy and part of the Bohemians. They claim the Bohemians used to perform alchemy where they would transmute a material into the glass. They assert that after World War II, they got rid of Bohemia, a country that no longer exists because it was absorbed into other countries, because they wanted to get rid of the Bohemian roots. The speaker notes that the only Bohemia people know is Bohemian Grove, which they claim has inverted everything. They conclude by reiterating that Bohemia was very connected to alchemy.

Speaker 0 describes uranium as incredibly hot: “it’s pretty fascinating how hot uranium gets in the sun, about 20 degrees hotter than what it is outside.” They assert that this heat is “burning hot” and that touching it is nearly impossible. They show samples labeled with silver and gold, and then “this is pure uranium,” calling it “really cool.” The speaker claims that uranium converts to helium and hydrogen. They note that when a meter is placed in front, “it starts to go bananas.” The speaker concedes a common caution by saying, “they tell you uranium is gonna poison you,” but then states, “this is what makes the hot springs.” They explain that uranium converts to sulfur, and that sulfur is what makes the hot springs and “everything so hot.” The sequence implies a connection between uranium, its conversion to sulfur, and the resulting heat in hot springs.

There's no reason to bring any LEDs into your home. The none. Zero. Zilch. No reason at all. There are incandescent bulbs all over the place. And if people say I can't find them, you haven't searched. All you gotta do is type in incandescent bulbs. They will come up. You should have incandescent bulbs in your house. If you don't have incandescents, you could have halogens. If you don't have halogens, you could get those little reptile bulbs. And it's funny because the reptiles have better light bulbs than the humans. You know all the reptile bulbs are incandescent red light bulbs. That's what keeps the reptile healthy. So the reptiles have incandescent red bulbs, but the humans have LED cold bulbs. So yeah, when you start to sit here and think about the whole thing with you know why they're pushing LEDs is because they want your light bulbs to hook up to your WiFi, to hook up to your Bluetooth, to hook up all your devices in your house. And then they can watch you like some Black Mirror episode. The Centennial bulb and it's actually still burning in California. It's been burning since nineteen o four. Incandescents have been burning for a hundred and twenty years. Health and Light by doctor John Ott, or Light as Medicine by Jacob Liberman.

The speaker discusses the bubbles' composition, filled with nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, argon, and brandy vapor. Changing the gas ratio creates photoluminescence. They present a sculpture called "Castle in the Sky."

Speaker 0 presents several claims about uranium glassware. He recommends eBay as a source for purchasing uranium glassware, and asserts that uranium is very energizing. He contends that people are told not to drink from uranium glassware because “big pharma wouldn’t make any money if people are drinking out of uranium glassware,” and adds that uranium provides “the ionizing radiation of the sun,” implying that warnings about the sun’s danger are motivated by financial interests of big pharma. He extends this logic to uranium glassware and other beautiful glassware, claiming they are “very charging” and that they “boost your energy.” He further asserts practical benefits: uranium glassware can be used to water plants, with plants growing three times the size, and food stored in uranium glassware—such as flowers or herbs—will last three times as long. He asks why these claims aren’t more widely discussed, then references the “radium girls” who used to lick paint and the nuclear issue, stating that nukes are fake and that fear about these topics is used to control people. He concludes that vintage glassware is where it’s at. The speaker then challenges the idea that vintage glassware could be toxic by asking why, if it were, every grandma and grandpa drank from it. He cites examples of uranium-containing items that were common in households, including uranium plates, forks, bowls, dishes, and other vintage glassware, using this to imply a historical acceptance of the material. He closes with a concluding remark: “That’s yeah. That’s a funny one.”

The speaker discusses red light therapy, advocating the use of a red light incandescent bulb that costs about $7 to $10, which you can plug in to treat with red light. They argue you don’t need the masks associated with seizures. They contrast incandescent bulbs with LED masks, stating that the LEDs flicker like crazy, causing nausea, and they emit radio frequencies that are “toxic to your brain” because you are pulsing your brain the entire time. The speaker recommends sticking to old incandescent bulbs, noting they don’t cost much. They comment that the government wanted to ban incandescent bulbs, but claim these bulbs are linked to health issues and are perfectly legal.

Speaker discusses the Sennett Quartz Health Lamp, noting 'they created these in the nineteen fifties' and 'UV healing frequencies as well as sitting out in the sun.' It describes 'This is a mercury arc lamp with quartz glass so that it allows the UV spectrum to come through, and people would sit in front of these and bathe with this device.' 'As soon as you kick it on, these UVs are pulsating.' 'You can hear it, and you can see it is very, bright even in the daytime.' 'And what a person would do is they would sit in front of this and they would get the UV healing frequencies.' 'They didn't have to drug them and cut them up and pill them and everything else. They just used beautiful frequencies of light.' 'And if you also notice on my hands, can see a greenish spectrum. That's the color coming from here. That's what's interesting.' 'Light Medicine of the Future by Jacob Liberman.' 'You got all the benefits of UV which blood pressure, helping the heart, also helping with weight loss and improving the thyroid.' 'So see what they don't tell you about light.'

The speaker demonstrates a Tesla tower lighting a fluorescent light bulb wirelessly. The bulb is still in its package and has no wires connected to it. The demonstration is presented as an example of Nikola Tesla's concept of wireless transmission of electricity.