reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Joe Biden invited 70 influencers to watch his state of the union address. One influencer declined due to concerns about political neutrality and authenticity. The influencer felt uncomfortable with the last-minute posting requirements and lack of budget. They questioned the motives behind high-profile figures engaging in political activism. The influencer emphasized the importance of authenticity in using a platform for political purposes.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a historic shift in American public opinion regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict. - Speaker 1 notes that public opinion on who voters sympathize with shifted dramatically in the wake of the current war. In October 2023, Americans favored Israel by 48 points; now, they favor the Palestinians by 1 point. He says he reviewed polls since the question began in the 1980s and that this is the first time Palestinians lead on this question, marking a historic shift away from the Israeli position toward the Palestinians. - He emphasizes that the shift was led by Democrats, moving from Democrats favoring Israel by 26 points to Palestinians by 46 points, describing it as a roughly 70-point swing and stating that, for the first time ever, more Americans sympathize with the Palestinians over the Israelis. - Speaker 0 adds that the shift is “a first that I have seen in my lifetime” and credits independent media and journalists reporting from Gaza for bringing images to social media, including images of civilians and alleged Israeli actions. He asserts that without on-the-ground reporting, people wouldn’t have seen certain images, asserts that journalists were killed by the IDF, and claims those images contributed to waking people up. - He contends that APAC is panicking, citing a new ad and a rebranding as “America first,” and argues Israel has lost the media war and the narrative, including some conservative and evangelical support (referencing Charlie Kirk’s base). - Speaker 1 details a parallel shift within the Republican Party, noting a significant age-based divide. Among Republicans over 50, they sympathize with Israel by 66 points; among those under 50, they sympathize with the Palestinians by 25 points. This creates about a 40-point gap, with younger Republicans leaning more toward the Palestinians than older Republicans. - Speaker 0 adds that Israel has hired pro-Israel influencers—paid about $7,000 per post—targeting the youth to reel back pro-Israel sentiment in the conservative youth vote. He notes these influencers were primarily young, implying a deliberate strategy to mobilize younger voters, while older voters are less in need of such outreach. - The speakers conclude that this combination of media exposure, shifts in party and demographic alignments, and targeted influencer campaigns constitutes a broad, historic realignment in American attitudes toward the conflict.

The transcript centers on allegations that Naftali Aaron Kranz is a paid protester and that a group called GetFree recruits and deploys paid demonstrators. A journalist questions whether there is someone they can speak to, and the conversation suggests the person of interest is on the other side of a park. The speaker asserts that Naftali Aaron Kranz is “a paid protester through and through,” and that he posts on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters for GetFree, a company advertising itself as a grassroots organization while paying people to protest. GetFree is described as hiring for part-time mobilization support contractors, seeking individuals with four-plus years of experience in leading direct action, large-scale mobilizations, demonstrations, and civil disobedience (which is described as experience getting arrested). Compensation is reportedly 3,500 to 4,200 dollars per month for an average of twenty hours per week. The speaker claims GetFree’s stated mission is to undo white supremacy, despite the assertion that Kranz and others are paid to protest. The narrative highlights Kranz’s participation in protests, including celebrating vandalism, with an example cited of “Crown Heights stay winning” after an egg was thrown at a stranger’s cyber truck and dog feces placed on it. The speaker places Kranz at an abolish-the-police rally, noting he is not leading the protest but blending in with recruits, enabling a later photo op. The claim is that this recruitment tactic blends various leftist causes to inflate the appearance of each individual cause. The speaker also states Kranz works with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and was encountered at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. LinkedIn activity is cited again, with Kranz posting about paid protester roles and recruiting nationwide in Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore to expand turnout at events. When clicking a linked job posting, the contract is described as nine weeks, part-time, paying about 3,400 dollars in stipends issued biweekly, with responsibilities including recruiting and training people to drive turnout. The speaker identifies Nicole Cardi at the top of the Get Free movement and attributes a belief that George Floyd protests were a factor in Biden’s 2020 victory. The transcript connects protest NGOs to political goals, claiming donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the Department of Justice is investigating for foreign contributions. It also asserts ActBlue funds activists like Indivisible Twin Cities, which allegedly orchestrates resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis and has been paid protesters, receiving over 7.6 million dollars from Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros. The speaker concludes with a personal note to stay away, and the journalist states they have to go.

I received an email offering $1500 for anti-Trump content on TikTok. The campaign is funded by FutureForward, a super PAC supporting Biden and Harris. They aim to create division online by attacking Trump supporters. Despite the money offered, I refuse to compromise my values.

My For You page is filled with presidential campaign content and discussions about AI. Recently, I received a paid promotion offer to create a TikTok video supporting the Democratic side. The email mentioned sending an NDA to get started. Many people form their views based on what influencers say, but it's important to remember that they might be compensated for their opinions.

The speaker received an email from someone claiming to be from the Democratic Party, offering to pay them to post positive videos about Joe Biden. The speaker, who is critical of the current economy, replied that they know nothing about the economy or politics and would rather stay out of it. The party then asked how much it would cost, and the speaker jokingly replied with a high amount. The party agreed to pay the requested amount, but the speaker ultimately decided not to do it.

Speaker argues that social media influencers are paid under the table and that sponsors are hidden from the public. They describe two posts: the first calls for any influencer paid by a foreign country to register under FARA through the Department of Justice; the second proposes a badge, icon, or different color check mark to disclose payments, whether political, corporate sponsorships, or from a foreign government. The speaker says this disclosure should be made available to the American people and compares it to TV sponsorship disclosures. They emphasize that when influencers take money from foreign governments, it must be disclosed. They add that MAGA influencers who claim America First should be viewed as not America First if they take payments by a foreign government.

The DNC is allegedly seeking individuals to act as "authentic Democrat supporters." This is not an acting role, but the DNC will purportedly pay a per diem, cover meals and travel expenses, and encourages regional southern accents to enhance authenticity. The speaker suggests this is part of an astroturf movement, including Kamala HQ, Brat Girls Summer, and the coconut pill trend, which emerged after positive press following an attempt on 45. The speaker believes these initiatives aim to shift the narrative and regain control. The speaker jokingly encourages struggling actors to seize this opportunity for an "Oscar-worthy performance," even suggesting they aim for an EGOT. The speaker contrasts this with another candidate who can fill stadiums without paying attendees.

The speaker questions the organic nature of rallies for figures like AOC and Kamala Harris. They claim that 84% of devices tracked at these rallies also attended nine or more Kamala Harris rallies or Antifa, BLM, pro-Hamas, or pro-Palestinian events, with 31% attending over 20. The speaker suggests this indicates paid attendance due to the travel and time commitment involved. They believe the Democratic party is artificially inflating its popularity by paying people to attend rallies and protests, creating "rally professionals."

Kamala Harris is allegedly paying people to attend rallies. The speaker claims to have proof of this through a Casting Network billboard. The billboard sought nonunion actors for a Democratic event, offering payment, a per diem for meals and transportation, and coverage of flight and other expenses. The submissions were due the day before the speaker discussed it. The speaker believes this shows that the Harris campaign's ground game is a facade, as they are willing to pay for people to attend rallies.

The speaker claims the Democratic party is paying TikTok users thousands of dollars to create content promoting the party, and that they were offered nearly $15,000 to do so. They also claim to have seen mutuals posting content aligned with these pitches within 48 hours, without disclosing they were paid. The speaker says they received two pitches: one for ongoing monthly videos leading up to the election, and another to fearmonger about Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation. They criticize the Democratic party for allegedly using fearmongering tactics with bad information. The speaker notes that Heritage Foundation trustees are endorsing both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, and that Barack Obama previously worked with them. They state that one pitch instructed them to not directly say "vote for Kamala Harris for legal purposes." The speaker says they are informing viewers that people are being paid to create political content.

The speaker claims the Democratic party is paying TikTok users thousands of dollars to create content promoting the party, and that they were offered nearly $15,000 to do so. They allege that some mutuals began posting content aligned with these pitches within 48 hours, without disclosing they were paid. The speaker says they received two pitches: one for ongoing monthly videos leading up to the election, and another to fearmonger about Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation. They criticize the Democrats for allegedly using fearmongering tactics, noting the Heritage Foundation has been influential since the 1970s and that its trustees endorse both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. The speaker highlights a pitch instruction to avoid directly saying "vote for Kamala Harris" for legal reasons.

Listen to this. I can't believe these numbers: $10 million for Beyoncé to support Kamala Harris, $5 million each for Megan Thee Stallion and Lizzo, and $1.8 million for Eminem. Is this how it usually works? Also, how much do you think Donald Trump paid Elon Musk? Can Trump even afford Musk? It seems like these are just fake relationships where people are paid to pretend to support each other. This is ridiculous.

My TikTok feed is full of presidential campaign content, including influencers being paid to promote certain political views. I recently got an email offering payment to make a video supporting the Democratic side. Influencers may be paid to share opinions, so be cautious about where you get your information.

Taylor Swift is cited as an example of using famous people/influencers to share information. In 2019, she was the first line of the NATO Psychological Operations Center's presentation on AI social media censorship techniques, because they've worked with her in the past as a key actor who can be trained to spread desired messaging. Her IP discography was purchased by the Carlyle Group, the private equity arm of the Iraq war with Dick Cheney on its board, and the Soros Group. She had to rerecord her music to win back her rights. She was used to get out the vote for Biden in 2020. Time Magazine named her person of the year, and the Wall Street Journal hypothesized she'd be Biden's secret weapon to win the 2024 election. Her Eras tour has the economy of a top 20 nation state by GDP, making her a cultural battering ram to swing hearts and minds towards the West.

A drag queen received an email from Pallet Media offering $1500 for anti-Trump TikTok content. The creator brief outlined "do's and don'ts," including avoiding any support for Donald Trump and his allies, praising Harris and her allies, and attacking Trump supporters' intellectual or personal values. The drag queen investigated the offer, inquiring if it was for the Kamala campaign or a PAC campaign. They discovered the campaign was with FutureForward, described as one of the biggest super PACs with hundreds of millions of dollars.

A nail technician in South Philly is allegedly being paid $700 a week by Kamala Harris' campaign to attend events. The speaker's nail tech, who is considered like family, shared this information. The nail technician is not a citizen and cannot vote, but is motivated by the extra money. According to the speaker, this explains why many people are seen holding signs at protests; they are paid $100 a day with travel expenses covered, despite not being eligible to vote.

A creator states they were paid for their flight and given access to an event, but denies needing a DNC budget to travel the country and "drag MAGA." They claim their own credit card allows them to "drag fascists" and that they don't need DNC, MAGA, or social money. The creator mentions right-wing influencer Kim Higbee, who believes both right and left-wing influencers should get paid. Speaker 1 claims Kamala and the DNC are paying people upwards of $1500 for 60-second clips backing Trump. The creator denies being paid to criticize Trump, stating they've been doing it for free for four years and that it's easy to find people who dislike Trump. They assert there's no need to pay people to discuss election fraud or other problems related to Trump.

The video reveals suspicious donation patterns on fec.gov, with unemployed individuals making numerous small donations totaling tens of thousands of dollars to ActBlue and various Democrat campaigns. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with the Harris campaign sending emails asking for $1 donations using fear tactics. Fake donors were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing the campaign's desperation for small donations to potentially facilitate a larger scam.